TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZenofZer0 Archive

View 0 posts and 148 comments by ZenofZer0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Dudes really just need to stop paying so much attention to the “why men are shamed” part of it all. They already know the answer, they just don’t want to hear it. They’re looking for some way to make it okay in their mind. A 304 is going to feign outrage, try some accountability avoidance, and gaslight you into thinking you’re some kind of problem. If it matters to you, it matters to you. Don’t let pretty eyes convince you you’re a bad person for it. Subsequently, some dudes don’t care. The famo…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:20 PM
1

Men should be incredibly selective during this process. It is far better to never have that lifelong commitment than to throw your life and possibly your children’s lives down the drain because you’re a hopeless romantic. Marriage is a zero-sum game for men. We literally stand nothing to gain from 90% of marriages. Everything to lose though…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:37 PM
1

What patriarchy?
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:56 PM
5

It just goes back to the fact that feminism is not about equal rights at this point. It is about subversion. It’s a lot of the same shit going on rn in the west. We all know their logic cracks under scrutiny and the goalpost and evidence used to cite their plights if floppy floppy at best. It’s about power. It’s petulant brats wanting what they have not earned. When they don’t get it, they point to the boogie man “misogyny.”
/r/MensRights25/09/23 11:20 PM
1

Dude has never thought about anything other than getting his balls out of his gf’s purse… can’t blame him for not thinking of the Roman Empire.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:37 AM
3

Yeah, you right.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:56 PM
1

It’s a senseless word used to immasculate and devalue men. Typically it’s used by petty, conceited, entitled women. It used to mean that the individual was involuntarily celibate, meaning they’re a virgin and unless they change they are always going to be and die a virgin.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:12 PM
13

That’s really cool honestly. Sucks that dude nuked the account but I’m sure Reddit tried to shred him. I hope they stuck to their guns. Maybe his lazy ass sister should have done the same thing for the girls and provided some sort of mentoring too rather than screeching about how someone should do it for her.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:04 PM
4

Because they’re cucks.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:36 PM
2

Calling someone a twat. It’s simple, yet elegant and gets the point across.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:15 PM
1

It’s a goldy.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 01:48 PM
11

Cause she’s a feminist twat with no good ideas and can’t refute the arguments based on merits so she attacks character blindly and will look for the tiniest anecdote to build a straw man argument. There is no reasoning with those people. I would say to stop trying to engage with people like this. There’s no good that can come of it.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 06:56 PM
1

You need to just stop trying to argue with insanity. The only people trying to push those ideas either love the idea of a monolithic oppressor to blame their failures on, or are incapable of making their own thoughts and just latch onto talking points that they either don’t know/understand or are being outright intellectually dishonest.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:37 PM
3

Here comes the hate train: no women can’t contribute in the same exact way men can. Never have been able to and probably never will. That’s okay. There are other roles to play beyond direct action. Does that mean that females as a whole should have no role to play while their nation is in danger? No. There should be service in some way but it should not be relegated to picking up a SIBR and going into combat. I’ll agree that the whole “benefits of citizenship without the basic responsibilities” …
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:20 PM
23

/s
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:40 AM
1

Oh man. I had to read this a couple times. I thought you disagreed and then gave some anecdotes that were in favor of my statement, lol. I completely agree with your thesis though.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 12:36 AM
3

I feel like this was formulated using tricky wording for the furthering of cult-like activism. The question talks about beating their wife. I do not believe beating a marital partner of any sort is okay. That gets twisted in a way that “no one is okay with violence against women” which continues to try and push the needle of what is considered acceptable behavior and that men should be meek and submissive.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:57 PM
1

Dude, I just want to start by giving you a shitty “I’m sorry that happened.” I think it’s important for you to hear/know/understand what happened is not your fault. You didn’t deserve that. You didn’t ask for it. It’s fucking disgusting that to this date male rape is not taken seriously. It’s unfortunately more common than I think anyone even cares for it to be. I want you to know you deserve better. You deserve more out of life. I hope you take your time in dealing with everything that happened…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 08:16 PM
2

Why are we still stigmatizing steroid use period? It wasn’t a problem until a couple shitty parents walked into congress during debates and blamed steroids for the shitty parenting that ultimately lead to their child’s demise. I hate the fact we’re still having this convo. If you want to eat trembalogna sandwiches, as long as your an adult and informed, I don’t care.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 05:57 PM
1

That’s what makes the rhetoric so dangerous. It’s essentially the same type of drivel that led the working party to attack the Bourgeoise. We see what that led to…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:44 PM
1

Yeah, well you can blame squeamishness and try to defame rather than listen to your opposition. That makes conversation work real well. I’ll just go back to my first response. Your fucking desire for anything does not validate the act of it. Get over yourself. Pretending like anyone who disagrees with you is some kind of Victorian prude is disingenuous. I literally split the terms for sake of argument but it seems like your illiterate ass was desperate to start shouting at your keyboard with the…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 11:24 PM
2

I see some points you make, that in many cases it probably is inevitable. Now, let me be clear. I am not pro abstinence. I don’t think that is a feasible policy and tbh, like everything else when carried to the extreme it has issues of its own. Namely, perversion and deviance. I think you can educate and prepare (it is your duty as a parent imo) while also giving realistic reasons for why promiscuity is bad. It doesn’t do much long-term for men or women for the most part. Once again, there are e…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 11:17 PM
0

Dafuq? Alright. So for sake of argument let’s use adults/minors for legal terminology and juvenile/mature for biology since that’s more so how we classify life cycles of the animal kingdom. What you said is no less disturbing. “If you are capable of having children, you are no longer a child [within the juvenile lifecycle of the human species]. For females specifically, we are looking at somewhere between 10-14 on average. Its worth mentioning that edge cases exist in which the ovulation cycle c…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:37 PM
3

Cool. Idk if you have children or anything but that’s definitely one of the things I want to try and impress upon them. The science from several different fields have shown the ramifications of promiscuity. It doesn’t seem like the trade off for short term gratification is worth it. It just sucks combing through all the comments and seeing all these people who vehemently oppose anything of the sort simply for the sake of pleasure for pleasure sake.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:52 PM
1

JFC, you sound like a sex addict. The idea that self control is oppressive? Are you a literal chimp with the capacity of speech? You seem to enjoy at least some of the fruits of disciplined people that come before you and pretend like it’s an affront to encourage people to be better. It’s gross. That’s the waste that’s dragging society down. Be better.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:56 AM
2

How dare you try to elevate those that come after you. Don’t you know ThAtS hYpOcRiTiCaL.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:52 AM
0

No that’s not the problem. Your short sightedness and basic validation because “it’s natural” is silly. You know what else is natural? Living in the woods with a makeshift shelter. Killing and growing your food. Clothes are unnatural. We’re the only species that wears clothes in the way we do. Why? Because the human species is built differently. Capable of overriding basic impulses in a way that a lot of animals are incapable of. I don’t see you championing the cause of ditching all tech and tak…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:51 AM
2

But… you’re just a… a… prude. Quit acting like a boomer /s On a real note, I would take it a step further and say that it’s not only “liberated” but there is a pressure trying to push the natural to a line that is societally unnatural. Hell, you don’t have to look any further than marketing to show evidence of this. There’s a reason that “sex sells.” As a person becomes enticed, they get a hit of dopamine. This is not disputed. That very principle has hijacked generations at this point but I def…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:47 AM
1

It’s not a shock. It’s a line drawn for real reasons. Legally, the term “adult” cannot be on an amorphous spectrum. It has to be definable. For those reasons, 18 is recognized as adulthood. Because of that alone we have to include those presuppositions in mind when talking about potential power dynamics between a MINOR and and adult. It’s not that anyone is turning a blind eye to things. If you open that Pandora’s box, you’re asking for an even sicker world to manifest new symptomology of deprav…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:42 AM
4

Good on you! Idk if it was intentional but honestly I think one of my biggest regrets are sleeping around when I was younger…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:38 AM
5

Please listen to the people saying to just shhhhh. I would get real hush hush and I recommend documenting EVERYTHING. It’s not foolproof, but with shenanigans like this, the last thing you want is to sit in court and opposing attorney grilling you on why you had a certain inflection in your voice on the night of (whatever date here) and that it means you’re mentally unstable. Be careful man. I realize I’m no one to you but if you ever need to chat, yell, blow off steam, w/e, I’m here for you. Th…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 03:26 AM
0

Sounds like a personal issue. I can agree with how dating has changed and apps have put females in charge of the mate choosing process which has led to extraordinary hypergamy. But “lack of enjoyable sex within the confines of marriage causing males to resort to porn???” You lost me there. If you marry someone you’re sexually incompatible with, that sucks. It’s on you though. You have a (topically) simple question. Stay or leave. There’s also a million and one other ways to tackle this subject b…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 10:29 PM
0

That was a mic drop. Wish I could upvote twice.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:34 AM
1

Jung was onto something when he talked about the upsurge in peur eternis. It’s a phenomenon that has been on the rise for about a hundred years, at least the last (close to) century.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:22 AM
6

Yikes, what a human land mine.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/23 07:02 PM
4

I think that’s a perfectly reasonable question and honestly, if you don’t evaluate your stance and world view from time to time, you’re ignorant and lazy with no mettle to your cause. The reason I believe so strongly in principles like mens rights and stand against 4th wave feminism is because for many years I have watched/listened, evaluated, and come to the same conclusions: There are bad men and bad women. That does not mean that there’s a coordinated hierarchy with the sole intent of oppress…
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/23 05:29 PM
2

He was in the 1/26 superbadass Dco detachment. They’re so cool they actually serve without serving because they’re so cool that if a drill sergeant/instructor/etc fucked with em’ they would knock that dude out.😂😂😂
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 07:37 PM
2

Nah that dude is just like #1 on the inside. Sheep in wolf’s clothing. They act hard af cause they’re really soft.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 03:16 AM
2

Thanks man.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 03:11 AM
23

It’s about par for the course. The kid is struggling to find his identity as most teenagers do. The problem is that the internet has given a platform to extremist douchebags on all sides. Dude number 1 probably never even served in the military because “he was TOO badass” and now spends his time as a keyboard commando trying to gaslight 15 y/o kids. Dude number 2 just seems like a total femboy who’s gf threatened to peg him unless he “fights the patriarchy by her side.” He’s a fucking kid. Give …
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 06:24 AM
8

Yeah you got that reaction because modern feminism is a cancerous ideology which for the first time stresses victimization and entitlement rather than traditional feminist values. You’re never going to win against that because it has many of the same properties as a cult. That’s not your fault but there’s nothing you can do beyond staying away from the petulant brats that espouse that ideology. On another note, I’ve been there. It’s not cool feeling like your needs don’t matter. I don’t spend a …
/r/MensRights16/01/23 03:01 PM
5

Fuck her. Fuck the “you don’t know her PTSD” bullshit. I’m so sick of that fucking word. No one even knew wtf it was until about ‘07 when dudes came back from the GWOT fucked in the head and now suddenly everyone likes to pretend that because they didn’t get the car they wanted on their 16th birthday, that they now have flashbacks and crippling anxiety from it. No, there’s no right to assault someone who is not trying to harm you.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 04:14 AM
2

I’m just trying to figure out what she thinks should happen? He should just pretend his wife isn’t a hoe? He should just pretend to trust her while he’s unable to believe a damn word just because she proclaims that “she changed?!” Nah man, at this point it’s over. Once that trust is gone, the love goes, and it gets bad fast. Just get a damn good attorney, protect your kids and your assets. GTFO.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 07:49 PM
2

Nah. They should bring it up because it really helps to identify those “grenades” that men don’t want to deal with and comments like “I can be a real bitch because I’m a Virgo” really help to ID that shit.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 02:49 PM
6

This article just illustrates that men need to continue checking out… of everything.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 09:43 PM
11

r/whiteknighting
/r/MensRights19/10/22 07:43 PM
8

Whoa, whoa. Stahp it. That’s a based-ass take and has way too much common sense and reality as well as attempting to accommodate people at the same time. Take the post down now!
/r/MensRights19/10/22 07:43 PM
4

Take away parental rights, destabilize economy, incentivize divorce, shirk the notion of gender roles… men are losing interest in fatherhood You don’t say?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 02:02 AM
11

F*cking cat lady, red-wine, woulda been, moms. The ones who are past their heyday and project all of their frustration with their current life-status into absolutely everything in a way to make it about them. Just ignore them. They’re so desperate for something, anything that usually negative attention will suffice for them. Just bail on it.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:09 AM
3

I disagree. Choose by exiting the argument. I’ve been told my entire life that I don’t get a say because I don’t have ovaries (I know, I know, hard to believe on an MR sub). The last year has been the only time I’ve been told I’m allowed to have thoughts, but they have to be pro-choice now. I’m bowing out. I’m not championing any cause and I don’t particularly care because I was told not to. I’m tired of hearing about it. The only congressman that I believe I have ever heard mentioning any of th…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:24 AM
1

I’m glad someone, anyone has dialed into this. It might one of a few things I agree with him on. I also like the fact that he had platformed a new age of rights with data/consumer protections.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:09 PM
6

Because most of them are simps and that is the truth. I really do feel bad for some of them, like the ones with low self esteem that think they have to play that game to get with some chick that will just chew him up and spit him out leaving him emotionally bankrupt in a way he didn’t think possible. At some point though, they have to want to be more and take action to be better and they will start feeling better about being better and it will start a cyclic process like the one they’re stuck in…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:42 PM
2

It’s been attempted a few times, so idk if I’d trust anyone with your seed.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:40 AM
34

Yup, just remember you can sleep with whoever. You better be careful of who you procreate with though. Something similar was the beginning of the end of my first marriage. Edit: OP if you see this, the choice is yours and I’m sure you can find a way to save this. I want to pose one question to you if you do see this and decide to save everything. If this is the woman your wife is to become, what kind of father will you be able to be to your child. If her tantrums manipulate the nature of the rel…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:03 PM
11

They like to conflate the two in order to try and force an association of shame into a group of men that cannot be controlled by them. It’s just a piss poor attempt at a power play. You don’t see MGTOW responding though. It’s cause they don’t care. that is why if/when you decide to go your own way, you do it with a clear conscience and without resent. It frees you and they hate it. Let it become their baggage, not yours.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:25 PM
4

There are some bad dudes out there. I’m not going to say that it’s incels in particular although they do have a higher propensity for becoming unhinged. The more important part I think, is the radfem world. It’s not hard to find, talking about being unable to rape boys cause they get hard. They talk about “murdering” unborn boys (their words not mine) because they’re male. There’s much more but I think that gets the point across. My point is that it’s radicals period but because being a radfem i…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:19 PM
5

A wise woman once said: Hoes mad, Hoes mad, Hoes mad, Edit: formatting
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:55 AM
2

It’s funny that your soon to be ex uses that as her reason. My ex wife stole all of our joint money on the basis that I had a job and she had not, ever since we got married, years before kids. It’s funny how they like to flip that model on its head
/r/MensRights28/09/22 07:28 PM
2

I agree! It’s not a controllable response ffs, but because it’s some bullshit that was propagated and what impressionable idiots heard first, that means that it must be correct. It would be a repulsive equivalent to a female “getting wet” as a litmus test for rape and the fact that this is a conversation piece is disgusting.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 07:07 PM
15

Wow, this could change things. . . I’ve heard too many times that if you get a boner it’s not rape which I find repulsive. emotionally blackmailing you when you know that on a purely physical basis (except for this dude) you could toss her off like a rag doll but don’t because you’re terrified of what that call to the cops would mean for you. Yeah I really hope it goes in favor of this dude.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:26 AM
1

Black dudes are killed at a rate of almost 5x black women. Why is it she has a problem with acknowledging this?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 06:54 PM
8

Why are dudes checking out of relationships? Hell, now you don’t even raise your kids, you have teachers that pass these kinds of values and swear your kids to secrecy until they’re too far gone. Well, they’ll just keep checking out. Things will eventually change. Right now we’re making a transition from peak as a society with inherent excess.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:50 PM
4

This isn just men though. It’s exemplified in men, but not exclusive. I’m not saying that to detract from this particular case I’m saying it because this is a sickness within society. Everyone is desensitized and disaffected by death, trauma, and everything bad while also living in their own bubble that insulates them from meaningful living. Idk, you have a sick. Idk if there’s a cure though. Man be it’s just too far gone and we have to wait for the recourse.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:27 PM
7

Just buy her a farewell gift of a vibrator and a cat. You can throw in the wine bottle if you want too. The fact is that she will most likely be alone unless she finds some creepy subservient dude that lets her *** him instead. Don’t waste your time on these women, not worth. I’ve been in a miserable committed relationship and found that it’s soooo much better to be alone. About that time I found someone cool. I’m not special. Each and every last one of you can do the same. I’m serious about thi…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:02 PM
1

Alright man. It sounds like you’re moving forward. That’s great! I’m serious though if you need to talk, please talk to someone. I don’t mean to be a downer, but even after it’s settled it probably won’t be settled. My fight started May 29, 2014 and hasn’t really stopped. I hope yours goes better. Just remember every time it gets bad, that little dude needs you. PS I’m guessing the femcels found and are trying to review bomb the post.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:16 PM
1

Hey man. I went through the same thing when my son was about 13 months old. It really messes them up and it fucking hurts both of you in a way that is indescribable. Evil people do that shit and I’m so sorry to hear it’s a thing for you. I’ll give you what I can based off of my experience. -Your son does not understand the implications of what is going on. They have a very limited understanding of object permanence, so in some ways he may not know you. -if he does it is possible that it really f…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:30 PM
3

You don’t. It’s a pointless conversation with someone who is ignorant at best and cunning/manipulative, self centered, and egomaniacal at worst. Just walk away.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:40 AM
1

If they’re saying that because men are more likely to take a position of power and responsibility, I believe that’s a stretch. I’ll go ahead and piss everyone off by saying it is our responsibility though because we can, more effectively, directly fight and unfortunately possibly die in a war. This isn’t coming from a position of faux-pas machismo. I spent almost 10y in the army and most of that was spent in the infantry at a time just before they opened combat arms to females. The problem is th…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:12 PM
0

Who says men want to? That’s ridiculous. Can we just all agree that is a stupid comment?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:04 PM
2

Interesting. On one side, shit like this sucks to hear. I think dudes hear it a lot more especially early on in life though. If I had a nickel for ever nasty breakup where suddenly I was inept in some way, I’d probably have a lot of nickels. I think to some extent this is something women prefer to have the monopoly of perpetrating. That being said, when you have someone you care about this is a hard conversation to have regardless of m/f and you need to be delicate about it on both sides. Just c…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:59 PM
1

Then you need to get out and work on you first off. You need to stop deriving pleasure out of hurting people by letting them fail to hurt you and learn to cut the relationship off before it gets to that point because hopefully you’re being the best you and the best you does not deserve that. I’m coming from a place of love, man. I hope you’re able to find peace.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:00 AM
1

In order to get to the bottom of this I think certain key questions have to be answered: 1.) what is covered in rights regarding bodily autonomy? 2.) who has them (does it have an age floor/cap/ exceptions/etc.) 3.) in times of conflicting viewpoints or legality, which individual(s) do the rights default to? 4.) what is a man’s role in parenting/child rearing? 5.) what are his rights? 6.) what decisions do we allow children to make with regard to legal consequence/bodily autonomy?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:44 PM
4

Dude. This is probably the most ridiculous thing I’ve read in a bit. I haven’t really thought of the fact that as a gay dude, you’ve still got women trying to prove some allegation of SH. Part of me wants to laugh about the sheer irony of it. Especially when you popped off with the lengths you apparently HAVE TO go through to “prove your gaybility.” All I can say is keep your head up. We’re all dealing with the shit. It’s not right, especially not for dudes like you. I am really hoping it’s just…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:11 PM
2

Well, on the bright side you get to see people’s true colors and understand that the mod(s) of that channel are radfem/femcels themselves. That’s nowhere any self-respecting person wants it to be. They want it to be hyper polarized echo chamber where they can retreat for confirmation bias and reassure each other it’s they patriarchy’s fault that they’re a perpetual dumpster fire of a human. They took the guesswork out of it for you.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:05 PM
1

It’s just stupid people being stupid. It does not good to entertain them or give real estate to them inside your head. You will never change their mind. Theyre generally psychotic as well. What you have to do is take that energy and engage with their initiates who hopefully have not been completely brainwashed and attempt to have a meaningful conversation and maybe even gain some insight.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:15 PM
1

On the second page I wanted to ask the question “what is a woman?” Since she had such a problem with being called anything other than a woman and using the term woman no longer implies that it is a female and is stated as a reductionist and/or “essentialist” outlook.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:21 PM
6

They spelled RAPE wrong.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:30 PM
2

♥️♥️♥️
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:30 AM
2

I find it to be an interesting dichotomy. On one hand, you need self love (not the superficial kind) and to know and accept yourself for who you are while striving to be better every day. So many people conflate that with ego and I personally think it’s compensation for those who do not like themselves or are out of touch and trying to project a facade of who they aren’t so much as they want to be. Idk. I just wished more people were comfortable in their own skin and at the same time just tried …
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:08 AM
3

I think they miss the mark on that statement because soooo many people are ego-driven and believe that they should be a focal point of the world. When someone thinks like that, attacking a problem or bad idea is the same as attacking them. There’s no separation. It’s sad really because they’ll be doomed to an endless cycle of failing/unhappy relationships.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:43 PM
5

That’s awesome. Remember though, you deserve someone no less devoted to you then. That’s not to say that you won’t have dark days regardless of how good of people you are cause sh*t just happens sometimes, but you deserve the very thing that you are striving to be. I wish you nothing short of it.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:29 PM
3

That’s really creepy that they did that. Do you ever think it’s some kind of projection and jealousy? Idk if you’re married and I don’t think it matters in this context. I just find it to be a really telling leap that you say something rational and they immediately associate you as being some kind of sub. Obviously you’re not the first or last but I really can’t help but wonder if it is a projection or an animus issue.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:12 PM
2

Yeah man, that is critical theory in action. The problem with it is that once people buy into it, it turns them into a bunch of little sociopaths because when they define their perceived oppressor as the source of their agony (even if self inflicted) they lose empathy and are able to act in a way that humans are not supposed to act towards each other
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:44 PM
-3

Fair asks: I’ll do my best to address them -the draft has not been done away with because it is a contingency plan. I breezed over this in the above response but I’ll go into greater detail. The draft exists to bolster numbers in the case of diminished forces, especially in the case of armed conflict. It also serves to function as a possible deterrent. I agree that I’m not a fan of it either but I also don’t know if any way to circumvent it in a predominately volunteer service short of getting t…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:37 AM
-6

So I’ll just come out and ruffle all the feathers because I really just love people using the military and especially combat arms as their little egalitarian social science sandbox. I’ll go line by line. -trans people on hormones including hormone blockers are cat 3 and non-deployable so that argument is a non-sequeter. -up until fairly recently women were barred from combat arms. Now, I could understand the argument of “but are they now?” That is a big no. What I will say is that they have prov…
/r/MensRights02/08/22 10:54 PM
2

Bail on that sh*t if it doesn’t work for you. I’m sure there’s some dudes out there that would love to spend a couple of minutes fooling around quarterly and get back to their lives. Leave her for them. You’ve gotta find someone with a similar tempo. It’s definitely hard because it seems like women lean into sex until they’re married but the least you can do is try to find someone with a similar appetite (at least as presented).
/r/MensRights01/08/22 07:27 PM
1

Oh it’s perfectly legal. We live in a society that values victimhood as a currency and bear a branding of oppression because at this point in time claiming oppression grants you immunity from the responsibility of contributing to society. Statistically speaking a large % of the population are in fact straight white males. According to those who have attempted to seize the power structure of society, that makes them inherently evil. What they don’t say is the permanent victims exemplify every tra…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 10:14 PM
2

Well that’s just rude. I had no idea that saying turning the other cheek was a bad idea was such a radical concept.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:24 PM
2

Yes but playing by a different set of rules than people who dox and cancel and ruin lives of people they disagree with is a sure fire way to ensure that you become a soft target. I’m so sick of the “turn the other cheek, it’s wrong” argument, the people who do it don’t give a f*ck about morals. They care about power. You can’t fight power hungry morally bankrupt humans with pacifism.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:09 PM
4

I think there’s a reason that people get insulted based on a stereotype. I think it’s healthy to take an introspective look at yourself (depending on the source of the insult) and ask if you’re being an overcompensatory jerk. The insult is not towards your genitals. It’s that your acting a certain stereotype. Now, before the hate rolls in. . . I spent a really long time in the army, infantry specifically. Let’s just say you do everything together. With this comes all of the talk of dcks. Big dck…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:18 AM
0

I’m not worried about whether the first feminists called themselves as such. Things like that happen in history when a name gets attached afterwards. I think most people who d taken a look into the multigenerational “feminist movement” are aware that it has some black eyes throughout its history but I am going to judge it on its merits instead of isolating the bag things and focusing on that exclusively. I think the changes that it brought overall was a net positive even though it was far from p…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:23 PM
1

I think we’re in agreement then. Yes you should be judged on your merits. At the same time, gatekeeping practices that are non correlated with the gate it is keeping is a bad thing but I don’t really see that as a systemic issue these days.that isn’t to say that it doesn’t happen in individual sectors but it is not an institutional issue anymore. The other part of this conversation that has never been addressed is the axiom of rights and responsibilities. You cannot separate the two.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:09 PM
1

Whoa. Egalitarianism is something completely different than equality in practice and is cancerous. It has failed in every institution that I know of as controlling outcome by an enforcement of “equality” is more of a totalitarianist behavior and less characteristic of a free society. Maybe you have successful examples, idk. Furthermore, language and words are incredibly important. I think there’s a difference between the establishment of common language and semantics. I think a lot of the issues…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:52 PM
-2

I disagree. 1st and 2nd wave feminism were definitely aimed at giving the rights and abilities that should have been an absolute “duh” since the beginning and it’s a shame that it took multiple movements spanning the greater half of a century. That said, my problem comes in at “modern feminism” which seems more like some weird cult that stand for this ridiculous concept of hatred of men because of predecessors and skirting responsibility for anything in their lives by blaming an invisible boogey…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 10:48 PM
3

Yeah, we’re in total agreement about the last part especially. Honestly, I put a lot of the responsibility of keeping hands to selves on the part of men as a responsibility of the adult men to show the ones “under them” that it is not an okay behavior. It’s not cool. Not manly. Not funny. We have to erase that as a societal norm. The worst part I believe is that it never really was a norm (past the dark ages) but has been projected as a thing by media/entertainment and almost injects it into soc…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:05 AM
5

First off, that was a helluva(n) initial post. I would love to go line by line and address each point you made but I do not have time to fully address it as each point made is a fairly large subject to tackle so I will add my 2¢ on one that’s near and dear to my heart. That’s toxic masculinity. I think it’s hard to really nail down because it is by definition vague and subject to each person’s perception. I see two ways that this trickles down and I’ll summarize it with a story my son came home …
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:52 AM
3

Bro, it’s called a thirst trap. Just ignore her before you fuck your world up. You think she’s a dealer... do you want your child around that? IDK. I guess I just go back to the old rule of “never dip your wick in crazy.” There’s also a couple of other red flags from your story that really say “stay away” but at the end of the day it’s your life. Just be safe man.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 10:07 PM
2

I get it. Idk that they have more rights at this point. I think we have to look past the legal (I do not know a law that only applies to one gender in definition that does not have any reciprocity for the others). The biggest hurdles I see are societal ones that are much deeper than the legal: Men cannot be victims of domestic violence Men cannot be raped Men are not as good of parents Men are inherently dangerous (as compared to women) and therefore present a threat at all times I can go on but…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:30 PM
0

Of course it’s possible to be a feminist without hating men. Feminism has very little to do with men. It’s about the empowerment of the female sex. Look at its very roots in the women’s suffrage movement. That had nothing to do with man-hating. That was “hey, WE ARE HUMANS AND DESERVE THE RIGHTS THAT EVERY ADULT CITIZEN HAS!” Look at second-wave feminism. “We deserve to be able to work and treated as equals in a workplace.” (The insinuation is once again that as a human, females deserve human ri…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:15 PM
2

Can confirm. Tried to get vasectomy at 21-22 and the doc laughed at and told to come back in 10 years or after at least 2 kids.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:16 PM
2

First off, all you can do is be you. Be the best you that you can. You don’t have to apologize for any subset of the human race whether it’s sex, race, nationality, religion, orientation or any other characteristic. The only thing you can be accountable for is you. If you really want to help, I think the greatest thing you can do is advocate in all of the small ways for men’s rights. Whether that is just being willing to talk about your position or actually trying to help politicians that have a…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:04 AM
20

That is true, but even a semi credible accusation in an obvious crime that has “no other” potential connection warrants an investigation. I do agree that all people are innocent until proven guilty. I think the outrage comes from the general consensus that “he had no enemies so it’s an anomaly, case closed.” Whereas in many female murders, the husband/boyfriend are often taken in immediately and without any kind of substantial claims.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:28 AM
3

How dare you advocate for men AND animals. Don’t you know that men have hurt animals, and men don’t even have feelings like animals do. Refusing to acknowledge this is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:56 PM
1

I’ve sat on both ends of the spectrum as far as partners. I will be the first to say that it IS NOT ALL OR EVEN MOST in my experience. It’s a pretty even split honestly. What I have seen is that more confident women and women who are more initially sexual are the worst offenders of this. From what I’ve gathered there’s some commonality in this. I’m sure I’ll ruffle feathers but this is the world as I’ve seen it and may not represent an accurate account of an objective truth: women of this nature…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:40 PM
1

Actually the military has done pretty well so far. The thing I’m seeing that people don’t seem to get is that the military isn’t about you (as in a single individual). You assimilate to the military. It doesn’t cater to your desires and interests and it says a lot that this theme keeps coming up and people can’t comprehend a world where it’s not about them as the individual. It’s more likely that we’ll lose the next war because of that mindset.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 11:32 PM
0

Ah, and the privilege speaks. Bold words spoken from someone who will never feel those repercussions. I absolutely love the arrogance in that statement. Like you’re above it all... save it.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 11:05 PM
0

Yes, they don’t interview you. You don’t get a case worker. You don’t get a career counselor. You get on a bus and go bye-bye.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 11:03 PM
1

No, if they were just cannon fodder, we wouldn’t have won a single armed conflict. Do people get injured and die? Yes, of course. You do everything to avoid that... which feeds right back to my original argument.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:49 PM
0

Just laugh a bit. I was trying to break senseless tension. I know what it is... although that’s not the object of combat arms, moreso the antithesis of it.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:41 PM
-1

I’m not talking about soft positions. That was never stated. You know, for someone arguing the draft you do not seem to know about how a draft works... for the last time. THEY DO NOT PICK THEIR JOB. There is not soft core/combat arms choice. Your number is called. You report to a port of call. You get on a bus/plane and you report for duty.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:38 PM
-2

Not worried about a role being taken. I’m worried about combat effectiveness of our military, not your feelings. Once again, during a draft they don’t ask you what you want to do. They tell you (and your number series) where you’re going and what you’re doing. Canons havent been used in a really long time btw.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:32 PM
0

That’s probably the most comprehensive counter argument. My ONLY apprehension is how the draft works. It’s not like they get to pick their MOS at that point. HRC just uses numbers and will send number sets here or there and I think it could make for a major SNAFU that then has people (more than we’ve seen in previous drafts) choking the system out and evading now based on additional qualifications or lack thereof. Is there a way around that? Most likely. Would the federal government institute it…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:30 PM
-3

Yeah, the Israeli society is different from general western culture number one. The Israeli military strategy and general operations are different number 2. As I stated before, females failed the infantry standard of everything aside from shooting and basic land navigation (no weight, no combat atmosphere). Change the US military standard so we’re not carrying between 100-180lbs into combat. Women’s bodies break at a higher rate when we enter that territory. We can talk then. Change the standard…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:26 PM
-10

Don’t start with this. Women were not able to hold to (previously) the standard as it was known. It is now segregated into male and female qualifications and as a combat arms veteran I don’t want a diversity hire to watch my back. Pick a different battle for the backlash of “equality of sex.” The military is not the place for people’s political affiliations. Take it a step further and get them out of combat arms, period.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:35 PM
1

I think she’s well within her rights. I think most hetero people would be upset by this. You can’t legislate it, but it’s a pretty egregious lie. Like catfishing on a whole new f*cked rapey level.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 11:25 PM
10

Yeah baby foreskin seems to be a good source of stem cells. This is usually pretty hush hush but there used to be a daytime television show where Sandra Bullock talked about her anti aging cream with stems cells made from . . . You guessed it. If anything else were used it would be considered a human rights violation
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:50 PM
41

Oh, whoa. Are we stepping into children’s rights to bodily autonomy? I find this ironic due to the fact that they can get hormone blockers, but can’t choose to keep their foreskin.😂😂😂
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:32 PM
1

I see where you’re coming from and I appreciate the candid honesty. I will say that I disagree about the religious appeasement. I think this is a fundamental difference between certain sects of society. Although religion can be an indicator, it is not THE indicator. There’s a lot more that goes into it for a lot of the pro-lifers I’ve talked to. I will say that I agree with the idea of state-run states in all cases, not just this issues. We should have laws imposed by some twits that have no con…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 10:00 PM
1

Hey, if that’s what you want and that’s what you feel you have to do is be part of an insurrection, then that’s on you. I just wouldn’t talk about it like that on the internets because the federal government doesn’t always take kindly and id hate to see some stupid sh*t happen over you (or anyone else for that matter) have to deal with the full force of the legal system just because you were angry. Take care, man.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:09 PM
-3

No ones taking away rights! The federal government is actually stepping back for once and reducing their powers.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:25 AM
1

Yes. They will see bruises. You will be condemned.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:58 PM
1

Looks like curiousnerd is either a simp or Karen. Neither one has any credibility in my book.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:43 PM
1

Yeah dude. Unfortunately, you’re going to rely on a lot of character witnesses and you’re going to have to drive the fact home that this was never a problem until she found out you told someone. All texts, snaps, social media, phone activity, etc. needs to come to light. Good luck, man
/r/MensRights27/04/22 10:23 PM
3

It fails to address why men’s suicide rates are higher, lmao. Maybe it has to do with work stress, domestic stress, parental stress, lack of resources for any of the above. Could have to do with the fact that men are raised without inherent value across almost all civilizations. It could be related to the fact that like women, there’s a lot of unhappy men stuck in relationships that know if they leave their lives are ruined. Children are taken from them by de facto unless the woman is proven (th…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 04:45 PM
2

Nah, men will still somehow be held liable.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 05:16 AM
7

Oh man. Near and dear to my heart. All the independent women getting CS are all on welfare. I believe it’s title 4 but could be wrong. What’s even worse is the fact that THE STATE makes money off of your money. It’s not like your check goes to your child. No, the state takes it and launders it for a period of time and some sorry soul that paid 6 months after you paid for your child. I honestly think this is part of the reason that (depending on state) they side with the maternal parent in 78- ~9…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 05:15 AM
15

Have you been to a gym? Females are JUST AS BAD AS DUDES. The only difference is the societal viewpoint that “all men want it so you can’t harass them.”
/r/MensRights16/04/22 02:51 AM
10

Oh yeah. I can almost feel the vibes. You know the women who start yelling so their SO yells back and they go in hitting. Once it’s all over he has to apologize because he made her do it. He made her soooo mad.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:40 AM
1

Yeah. Any excuse will do. Just don’t take responsibility and stare at yourself in the mirror confronting your flaws and contemplating becoming a better person.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:38 AM
1

Do not wait unless you are hoping that you are not the father. The courts will take that as indifference and if she comes for you 1-2-3 years later and you have not made an attempt for this child in some way, she’s going to have you on the hook for CS and you’ll have to fight to see your kid for 3hrs, once a week under supervision.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:16 AM
3

Personal Opinion RE: Feminism strong distinction from any wave of feminism prior to “4th Wave” feminism. All of them had real and pragmatic, tangible goals that women and WR Advocates were successful at obtaining. You don’t strike me as the A-typical “modern feminist” and sound like you’ve got a good, logical, head on your shoulders so I hope you do find this comment and I hope it gives you something that benefits you in some way, shape, or form. Personal Goals of Men’s Rights: - I would like to…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:01 AM
2

Well... we’ve all been there. Many are still there. I’m going to say some things, open up on personal experience, and you can take what you like and leave what you don’t. (Btw, terrible thesis statement lol) I guess I’ll address the last parts first as they’re still fresh in my mind. The bottom 60-70% of men: this is a societal problem. It’s one that has been exacerbated by online dating as there was a paradigm shift with women finally dictating the courtship process. There’s not much we can do …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:20 PM
1

Okay. So we’re presuming that it’s more feminist halfwit rhetoric.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 05:05 PM
2

I can’t tell whether this is a joke or not...
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:04 AM
2

Alright man. You’ve gotta get a paternity test and a restraining order. You also need to take down the names and badge numbers of the derelict officers and report that. Idk if it’s city or county boys your working with but they have a long history of smashing dudes and not enforcing anything with wahminnz. You need to go ahead in the meantime while putting titter things together and also make sure you are preparing evidence, real evidence that displays behavioral issues she has or drug addiction…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 07:47 PM
2

Actually I had this conversation about female circumcision and the only resources mentioned it talked about how bad, evil, patriarchal, etc. it was. I don’t necessarily agree with it but the difference of the spin on western society is astounding.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:21 AM
1

It’s called narcissism. You can’t talk about anything other than them. Combine it with the “victimhood-points” system of America today. Viola!! Every last one of them.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:14 AM
1

Yeah, if you have to say more than it happens and cite statistics you’re not going to get through to them. It’s nothing wrong with you. Those types of people don’t listen to anything that they don’t agree with. Your best bet is to minimize their impact in your life. It sucks because you’re just seeking validation in the truth but they won’t listen. At the end of the day though, that’s on them and they will reap the fruits of their ways.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:40 PM
2

Yeah, this is one of those abstract “I haven’t seen the word and I haven’t had my ideologies tested but I have all the answers” kind of statements. It’s literally attempted thought policing. That’s ridiculous. Hate crimes are already punishable. Trying to blindly attribute motive really only serves to continue to create a bigger rift than there is.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:21 PM
1

If you take the steps to give them power over you then they will. I think someone pointed out earlier that in order to make real change, men have to stand together and although hopelessness is a symptom of the sickness I don’t believe it’s the solution.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:17 PM
1

Yeah man. I have dual degrees in networking and net security I’ll be honest, I was exceptionally lucky and after graduating I could not find anything directly related to what I wanted so I took a string of shitty jobs that ultimately led to finding a guy who wanted a junior engineer. Since that, I have been working as a network engineer for a Managed Service Provider. Think of it as an external IT company for companies that don’t have IT. It’s impossible to get bored with because you float in so…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 10:09 PM
1

Yeah not a problem one is under 10 the other is over 10 (stepson). I also have a daughter. I was in the army for about 10 years that was also during my divorce. I’m now in IT... quite the situation change. If I can give some advice, don’t let the bad females ruin your view on women. I’ll share: my current wife met me at a time when my ex wife kidnapped my son across state lines and then no court room would touch it funny enough. She didn’t let me so much as look at him for about 7-8 months “beca…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 04:03 AM
5

You right. Hell man, I’d be willing to fight again. Especially if I knew that there were others doing it. I really feel like I tried and even tried to get into some men’s rights groups that said they were active but it was just whining and woman bashing. I want to be part of something that makes a difference. I have two sons and keep thinking as they get older “this sh*t could happen to them?!” It’s really disheartening. I’m all ears man. Point me in a direction 😁
/r/MensRights22/12/21 03:22 AM
19

They’ll never rebel because women own the court system and generally get what they want. They know what side their bread is buttered on. As for the men, courts pull stuff like this to crush any sort of rebellion and make an example to cull descent. I tried to fight the courts. I was laughed at by a judge. I was called a liar by the judge and when I found out they’re not supposed to do that (as we had evidence and testimony stating such) I reported it and the committed my that polices that stuff …
/r/MensRights22/12/21 03:07 AM
10

I just find it funny because of the barrage of articles that were sent out this year regarding gf’s/wives being on onlyfans, and is as partners are supposed to accept, love, and encourage it. Then we get this... sounds kinda 1sided.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 07:01 PM
3

I actually got kicked out of a group yesterday because I spouted facts, statistics, sources, etc but they didn’t like the message. I think that this is a huge issue that creates further impediments while trying to strive for equality. The best reason I’ve heard so far is that we deserve every impediment that we have because we as men “r*ped, beat, imprisoned, etc women since the beginning of time.” I think some people are truly deluded.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 05:09 AM
2

The problem is that it’s absolutely repugnant. You would think that if you truly care about equality because you carry the plight of every female that came before you, then you would understand why there needs to be balance. It’s not about balance though. It hasn’t been about balance since 2nd wave feminism. Unfortunately it seems to be more about making yourself feel powerful by flipping off men until you get what you want (not necessarily YOU, but whoever the female is in the statement) becaus…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:07 AM
7

Rape has never been acceptable across society. Bad people, and sometimes bad people in control validated it through the use of holy books and other propaganda but there is not one society that looks kindly upon it. Abuse, once again, not confined by a specific western society but bad men in bad positions made it permissible at times. It doesn’t make it okay, but the “thousands of years of oppression” argument is a straw-man argument. If you don’t understand that, we can’t have a real conversatio…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter