TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zephyr9865 Archive

View 4 posts and 1,043 comments by Zephyr9865 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,043 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Spain, France and Germany are feminist infested.That's why I asked.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:12 PM
1

Which country?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:03 AM
3

Didn't you know?A key material (I don't remember which one tho), used for beauty skin creams is easiest found in the foreskin.(the foreskin ain't just skin, unlike what they would have you believe, like all body parts, it has purpose)
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:46 PM
4

The companies who make face creams using the foreskins.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:27 PM
5

Emphasis on "feel" It's all propaganda desperately supporting a myth that only exists because some rich fucks benefit from it and morons exist.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:29 PM
6

Those "medical benefits" are nonsense from one faulty study done by 3 religious fanatics and the myth is supported by companies who make creams from the foreskin, creeps, misandrists and useful idiots alike. You think that removing a layer of skin and directly exposing the organ to bacteria does anything good? And no, washing it is easy.The foreskin is retractable.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:49 PM
8

Fuck off. Having a foreskin is objectively better. Cutting all for 0.smh percent that have something related is stupid. It's like removing a lung because then you'll be less likely to get lung cancer.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:47 AM
3

I don't know who Trudeau is. They may have not been feminists, but that's irrelevant. They all lacked logic (since the ideas they were pushing), but that didn't stop them for getting and staying in power for a long period of time.(something they share with feminists)
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 01:36 PM
6

It doesn't, otherwise Hitler, Stalin and many other leaders wouldn't have been able to run a country.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 01:25 PM
3

Nah, I'm very well aware that nothing logical can come from feminists. If it comes from a feminist, it must be bs. Seriously, it's fun.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 12:40 PM
5

Because I like trolling you. And you identify as a feminist, so it fits right in.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 12:26 PM
2

And I like the projection you're doing.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 12:08 PM
5

Remember #believeallwomen and #metoo? By your logic, it is not up to whoever makes the claim.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 12:07 PM
5

I can say the same thing back. It's not like you proved that funding is equal.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:59 AM
5

Listen, I'm a normal person. I don't save a link in a text document for every possible argument. I just see it and move on, but I remember what I saw. However this shit is legit easy to find.It would be a waste of time to search it for you.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:56 AM
3

So you pulled it out of your ass when you said it doesn't exist?
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:50 AM
3

With the guidance of fellow feminists?
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:47 AM
4

I'd rather do what you feminists do all the time and tell you to look it up yourself.(outside of feminist circles)
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:46 AM
7

I've seen them advocate for closing down women's prisons alltogheter. Haven't seen the videos of feminists shutting down meetings about men's suicide?Easy find on youtube. Lastly, haven't you seen that the majority of suicide prevention programs are women only?And if not, designed to help women? It's pretty obvious.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:41 AM
6

"But men commit most crime" Sure. May I ask you, if it's ok to ignore a minority for the sake of the majority, then why do women receive most funding for suicide prevention, despite them being the minority. And yes, that is caused by feminism. And I've seen enough crap from feminists to know they would want it other way.Their actions are what caused this problem in the first place.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:34 AM
9

Who blamed women as a gender?We're blaming society for not punishing women who commited crimes (at least not as harshly) This is that stupid tribalism I was talking about in my previous comment.(and it's fking irrelevant) Someone is found guilty by proper due process, punish them.I'm tired of women who do horrible shit getting a free pass because men allegedly do it more. And if you think they should , then you're the problem.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:02 AM
10

And that's relevant because? Does that mean they shouldn't be punished just like the men who commit those same crimes?Fuck this group mentality.When are you going to realize that it's the individual who has to be punished ,not everyone who happens to have the same genitals. Also, when it comes to crimes against minors, women by far lead in perpetration, so whatever nonsense argument you wanted to pull, won't work.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 04:12 AM
5

Stop, you're giving legitimacy to this bs by arguing on the premise of it being true.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 10:05 AM
8

Misoginy is a buzzword thrown around at anyone whose opininons don't scream"men bad, women good". So both.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:16 AM
1

Except that's not what yhey want. They want any female on male abuse to the accepted.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 08:12 AM
1

Dude, if a woman cares about your money, then you're better off without her.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 09:06 PM
4

Majority of child abusers and murderers are female. Let's ban women from getting anywhere close to children. Still moral?
/r/MensRights10/09/22 08:54 PM
1

Your example is bad. It is not equivalent.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:28 PM
1

It literally is recorded. 97% of divorces end in the woman's favor. Given that 50+% of marriages end in divorce, this attitude being justified would imply that half of men deserve this. I don't care how you justify 1 case, what about the majority of times when it happens to good men?
/r/MensRights07/09/22 06:47 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/x5q24i/i_wonder_why_men_are_less_inclined_to_get_married/in33s9u?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:56 PM
1

So over half of men are like that?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:36 PM
1

These comments logically occur unjustified far more often.Stop trying to justify this.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:17 AM
1

Women can easily do that and face no consequences, so no.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:51 PM
1

No, every man that gets divorced gets taken to the cleaners. And that's over half of them.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:45 PM
1

So just because he initiated the divorce, he deserves to be divorce-raped? Why can't men walk away from a relationship without consequences like women do? This ain't equality.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:44 PM
1

I'm not mad because of the minority that were abusive and so deserved is (whatever percentage of those actually were), I'm mad about the majority, who did nothing wrong but still gets treated like this because her feelings or whatever bs.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:25 PM
1

How do you know he is? We already know this happens all the time. There's no way that over half of men deserve this, so there's no doubt a lot of men get this unjustified hate. And you wanna talk about initiation?What about the 80+% initiated by women? This needs to stop.This is why more and more men decide to stay away from women.Period.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:22 PM
6

When did I say that? I support true equality, but giving women more preferential treatment is not how to get there.They already have more rights and are viewed and treated better by others.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:18 PM
1

It's definitely the case because it's what they always do when they divorce the guy.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:15 PM
4

You can't
/r/MensRights05/09/22 12:15 PM
1

Emphasis on "feel"
/r/MensRights05/09/22 12:14 PM
3

What if she's stronger?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 12:13 PM
2

Compared, the sexism women face is nothing.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:41 AM
31

And they say that women are the victims of sexism.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:15 AM
5

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:08 AM
1

It is possible to say that regardless if he was abusive or not, this would still be the attitude.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:23 AM
1

They do. Most women have a strong camaderie, "sisterhood" if you will, and will side with another woman even if she's blatantly in the wrong.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:01 AM
1

Because they do this to all divorced men, which is over half of those getting married.If the attitude wasn't the same, then they wouldn't act the same. In order for this logic to actually be valid and make a dent in op's point, all those men would have to be bad.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:59 AM
11

The fact that this happens to all of them? If it wasn't, then it wouldn't.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:50 PM
5

That doesn't change the fact that this is the attitude towards all men getting divorced.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:49 PM
4

It is higher, why I said over.The stat is just counting old marriages also.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:34 PM
10

This is the attitude towards all divorced men, since they do this to all. For your theory of "they only do this to abusive men" to be true, over half of men have to be bad.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:33 PM
15

This post is showing what happens in divorce, which is over half of marriges, and it's pretty clear that women are like this for all, as they do it almost every time. He is saying that maybe the husband was bad, so that isn't the attitude and what happens to good men. Well, that would mean that over half of men are plain evil.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:28 PM
13

You didn't get it.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:22 PM
27

Let's be serious here.You really think over half of men are like that?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:15 PM
1

Their equality is female supremacy. They don't actually want equality.It's just a mask to avoid backlash. Objectively, there is only 1 way to have equality, so your bs falls.
/r/AntiFeminists03/09/22 06:35 PM
11

I only disagree that it's our responsability.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:40 AM
1

No, it isn't. Sexual things in general are viewed as a bad thing inherently.Don't tell me that dick isn't also used as an insult.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:48 AM
1

You are for forcing people into roles because of their gender.Roles that are outdated and whose enforcement hurts both genders. Yes you very much are against bot men and women, so please fuck off with your traditional gender roles, we don't want them.
/r/AntiFeminists03/09/22 09:45 AM
0

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 08:33 AM
2

Because fuck men. If there is power that they can give women, they will.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 08:31 AM
5

What a reasonable, totally not mentally deranged person you are!
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:04 PM
1

Male misandrist.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:34 PM
2

Feminists?Facts? I want what you were smoking!
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:43 PM
2

I don't believe they are the same, I believe they should be treated the same, as anything else proves to lead to unfairness. And if you're a tradcon, why are you even here?You clearly don't care about men, just upholding outdated, discriminatory bs.
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/22 06:31 PM
0

Feminism is female supremacy, wanting equality only where it would benefit women at the expense of men. And the fact that you view being pro-true equality as a bad thing speaks volumes.
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/22 02:15 PM
2

It's an instinctual response, not a logical one.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:43 AM
1

Idiot troll, I'm done.
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/22 09:41 AM
1

I didn't? Did you run out of arguments and are now resulting to mockery?
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/22 11:11 PM
2

Just search it on youtube, no way there aren't videos of it there.That's where I saw it.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/22 11:03 PM
1

You never seen the feminists shutting down meetings regarding male suicide as just 1 example that I could remember in 10 seconds?
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/22 07:17 PM
1

And if women just can't take responsability and go to war then why not take away their authority on matters that can lead to it?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:13 PM
3

Who said that I even want the touch of a woman? Women disgust me.Stay the fuck away from me.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:11 PM
2

And feminism has either caused them or fights against efforts to fix them
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/22 03:34 PM
4

There is no wage gap.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/22 03:33 PM
1

YOU did. Stop trying to claim that I wanted this.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:19 PM
1

I never said I don't hate the rich assholes, but I can also hate those who benefit from the unfairness and you never see them saying that it's not ok.Only straight up defending this situation or silently agreeing with it.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:24 AM
1

IT'S NOT MEN, IT'S THOSE RICH ASSHOLES. How many times do I have to repeat this?It's only 0.01% that this is true for, the other 99.99% are not in power to make any decision and they have no power to give women, so it's still female supremacy.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:20 AM
1

Supremacy is the state of being superior in authority, power and status. It doesn't matter who is giving them that. This is the biggest bs you female supremacist try to pull.It doesn't change anything.The problem is still there and the decision of a few rich assholes is not men, it's those a few individuals.Trying to blame men as a group for the actions of a few is intelectually dishonest.Or are you unable of viewing people as individuals?
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:48 AM
1

It doesn't matter who is treating them better. Supremacy is still supremacy.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:38 AM
1

Don't worry, a big conflict could start any day and it's completely irrelevant, nothing you said proves me wrong.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:47 PM
1

So treating women better than men is not female supremacy? And right now you're saying that all men should be punished because a few rich assholes want that. And again, you can't take the responsability, you don't deserve the right.Period. I'm not gonna go die for the decisions of my country when someone else who also has a say in them doesn't have to.Period.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:45 PM
1

So you support female supremacy and male disposability. THEY HAVE POLITICAL POWER, SO THEY SHOULD WOMAN UP AND FIGHT LIKE A RESPONSIBLE ADULT!
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:09 PM
1

If women, for ANY reason won't take the responsability of going to war if the decisions made land the country in war, then they should have no say in those decisions. Authority without responsability is tyranny.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:57 PM
1

What I said still stands. And I think you meant a few rich assholes (who weren't only men) who wouldn't have seen combat anyways, because I and many other men never wanted this.(or even had a say) And just like I'm not gonna respect women's decisions and desires enough to defend them with my life, I won't theirs either.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:49 PM
1

Because you were allowed to vote and drive before 18 and because for most of recorded history voting wasn't granted only for taking the responsability of going to war. If women are not willing to step up for their decisions and take responsability by going to war, then they shouldn't have a say on the matters that can lead to a war.Anything else is pure female supremacy.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:30 PM
6

That might explain it, but it's still mostly true in most 1st world countries.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:43 PM
5

Are you a woman or a minor?It's written in the email you get regarding the draft when you turn 18.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:04 PM
5

Men not registered for the draft can't get a drivers license, vote, and have to pay a 250000$ fine. That's a fact.Arguing against that proves only ignorance.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:01 PM
3

It is.And voting is also a privilege.(but just for men, for women It's a right.)
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:52 PM
2

No, those are the exempt ones.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:34 PM
2

Men with disability.Men who refuse to sign it don't have those rights.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:04 PM
12

Go fuck yourself, misandrist white knight moron. Sincerely, men.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:49 AM
9

Except you're horribly wrong.It is and also the right to drive as well.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:33 AM
1

Why would you even want to still be alive in old age, when your body breaks down?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:05 PM
1

I'd say traditionalism is better (as it's not all out female supremacy), but I don't want to argue. We should strive towards neither.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:24 PM
5

1.What role are they given? 2.Because Israel is the whole world.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:11 AM
2

They only don't value men's lives.If women were conscripted, it would be abolished by tomorrow because unlike men, people actually give a flying fuck about women.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:54 AM
2

Idk, didn't look into it.
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/22 12:38 PM
5

Liberal feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/22 07:49 AM
3

It's called projection.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 09:59 AM
3

I don't care what you define yourself as. Actions speak louder than words.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 11:08 AM
33

"Women tend to be rightfully angry when bot happen" Women tend to justify it when it happens to boys with arguments such if he got erect, he wanted it and oppression of women arguments. There, fixed it.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:54 AM
2

Nah, it was her 12 inch horsecock strap-on that did.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 11:47 PM
22

No, no, you see, HE gave her anal.She pegged him.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 11:01 PM
4

Yeah, those women are disgusting.As a man, I find them outright repulsive. And feminism is a hate movement.They are punishing men for being men, it doesn't just seem like it.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:11 PM
7

Try having your genitals maimed, growing up being constantly told you're evil, having to work extra hard to not get in a position a less qualified woman got because affirmative action, abuse against you being socially accepted (allowed) and no one caring about it, just assuming you must have done something to deserve it and nothing is done, meanwhile just her word of you abusing her, with no evidence, has everyone lose their minds and do everything they csn to destroy you, having your balls (the…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:29 AM
2

I agree that such kinks are bad and shouldn't be normalised, and that a partner who hurts you for any reason (nvm sexual gratification) is an abusive piece of shit, but it goes both ways. Women who like hurting men because "kink play" are no better than the men.As a man, there's few things I find more disgusting than women who are into cock and balls torture. "Only a woman could have such a lack of empathy towards men to be turned on by busting his balls"(or whatever other fucked up shit goes in…
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/22 10:45 PM
15

Because men are like that, and feminists are like those women.They are brainwashed to view themselves and their behaviour as good and men as bad, so they assume that just showing it the way it is paints men bad.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:36 PM
1

Also take screenshots of message conversations and record any verbal conversations (including phone calls) to have as proof.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:40 AM
6

Literally every military test, men do way better at. That's a hard fact. So no, not better than the men.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:38 PM
7

The endurance bit explanation:During childbirth, a woman's body releases chemicals that reduce pain in the affected area.(exclusively during childbirth) They outright lied that it's at all times and everywhere and here you have this myth of female higher endurance. Wage gap:The overall earnings of the average man are higher than the average female.(not taking anything else into account) They outright lied it's for the exact same work. Exact same validity:ridiculous myth.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:49 PM
12

That "endurance" is nonsense.It's just as true as the wage gap. And it's more like the top 1% that could, the to top 20% still can't live up to the standards set for men.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:42 PM
21

If they're a liability on the battlefield, which I heard quite a few male soldiers say, then yes.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:45 PM
1

Wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 03:17 PM
2

Nice no true scotsman fallacy.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 09:35 AM
1

The examples you gave are either irrelevant or just further proving my point.Looking at women as sex objects is not normalised anywhere for fk's sake. Also drawing misandrist conclusions out of thin air. You're a lost cause.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:50 PM
11

In this society, being antisocial truly isn't an indicator of insanity.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:04 PM
2

Yes, it's called feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 08:58 AM
1

Equity?F that communist sh1t.
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/22 03:55 PM
2

Women don't magically make men richer, healthier and happier.That would be ilogical. They just choose to start relationships with men who are already richer, healthier and happier. And don't forget divorced men, who were destroyed by marriage and are lumped in with unmarried men.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:06 AM
1

Whatever you say.😂
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 07:53 AM
1

Better:Don't marry.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 07:51 AM
1

Sad.You should get a partner for yourself, not for the validation of others (for obvious, common sense reasons).What is really important is that you like her body, not others, and it's also just as important that she's kind to you (mutual understanding, care, trust and kindness is the key to a happy, healthy relationship, obviously) and pleasant to be around and that you like her character. This should be very hard to argue against
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 02:34 PM
1

Sure, any self-respecting man would want a woman who can get their dick hard, but you can't deny the importance of kindness and a nice, pleasant personality.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 01:37 PM
5

You have no idea how often I'm called an incel. The other side is even worse than them.I've seen it personally.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 12:23 PM
10

What he said is kinda fucked up tho.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 11:55 AM
2

Wtf.Get some help, you shameless pedophile.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 07:55 PM
2

Children can see it (and yes, it does fuck them up) and I might not want to see disgusting shlong, hairy asses, loose bteasts and meatflaps whenever I go outside. The fact you even ask this provrs great stupidity.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 07:30 PM
2

No, public nudity should definitely not be legal for obvious reasons.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 07:09 PM
2

Not funny.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 06:46 PM
2

I haven't argued with anyone in over a week. And drop the smug arrogance, it doesn't serve you well.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 06:37 PM
0

You really that brainwashed to believe oppossing feminism is the only thing we do? I can do what you did too. It's very easy to make feminists look bad.If hating men and coming here to defend female supremacy is your whole identity, then you need better hobbies. This is not a "hobby", and yes, I do have other hobbies. That's all you need to know, because I'm not giving personal details to some stranger on the internet and you're most likely gonna say that I have no way to prove it and I'm lieing…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 06:18 PM
4

Resulting to mockery/insults just proves you're wrong and have nothing left to say but won't admit it. And don't call me "bro".We're not friends.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 05:22 PM
4

So you have no argument left?
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 05:20 PM
2

And another one of your blatant lies,being antifeminist is obviously not our whole identity.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 05:12 PM
2

Because hating an ideology based on the same oppressor/oppressed class bs as the nazis, causes men legitimate problems fighting for female supremacy whlie pretending to be about equality and in the same screeching that they want us all dead is the same as hating women. Feminists!=women Feminists=the crazy idiots who support female supremacy (and they can also be men) Stop lieing to yourself, you know very well it's not women we hate, you just want to make people believe we do so we can be silenc…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 05:10 PM
5

It doesn't take much to make anything or anyone look bad, so what's your point?
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 04:54 PM
8

Being in their group is a choice, it requires a certain set of beliefs. You can't choose to be a man, you are just born a man. Not the same thing.But of course, you have to twist it someway to make us look bad.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 03:47 PM
2

Nice strawman.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:36 AM
8

I'm all for mgtow, but introducing another way for men to have their lives destroyed is not the way.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:13 AM
8

Bruh.It's already being said, just not as a joke.(and it's old news)
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 07:14 AM
8

They don't let their emotions control them (if they did they wouldn't pass either) In thise moments, they just don't care.Road rage and missing a few rules by impulse are 2 completely different things obviously from different causes. Yes, you did miss the point.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:52 AM
4

Willing slaves are still slaves.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 03:23 AM
4

What has feminism done that is good for men? I can make a list of ways it hurt men.(take changing divorce laws for 1 example)
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 05:27 PM
1

Neither do I.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 06:23 PM
1

Bs
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 04:58 PM
2

Feminist lie.Hitting women always carried huge stigma.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 04:24 PM
1

Men don't have the right to opt out of parenthood either, so no abortion is equality. Aside, yes, they did. Only for a short period of time, married women weren't allowed to open a bank a account because the debt in divorce was on a man, so before, women before getting divorced, they took out huge loans and transferred to their account, leaving him with debt.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 04:17 PM
1

1.You're definitely responding to the wrong person.Your comment makes no sense as a response to mine. 2.Being a feminist requires you subscribe to a certain set of beliefs.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 01:21 PM
2

Actions matter, not words.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 01:18 PM
1

The average man didn't have it good either and rich women had it very good.It was more of a class thing. Yes, it is made up to get sympathy.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 01:17 PM
1

And lead the movement, set public opinion and make the changes in this instance. If the movement is not extreme, how come the extremista are at the top of it?
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 01:15 PM
8

Feminism is not about equality, but female supremacy.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 11:43 AM
23

Except it wasn't good back then either. You didn't read "the declaration of sentiments" or heard about the white feather campaign?
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 10:19 AM
4

Divorce may have been worser for the women in the past, so to fix that, they made it horrible for men. If you bothered to understand what I said, you'd know what I really said was that they introduced the anti-male bias in divorce courts when no fault divorce was introduced (tho I highly doubt it wasn't feminists who introduced no fault divorce too) Lastly, no fault divorce isn't really no fault when you assume the man to be guilty and treat him as such (as it happens now)
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 10:14 AM
4

Yes, when they introduced no fault divorce.(which includes all the other stuff that causes this unfairness in divorces) Important to note: by "no fault" they mean the fault is put on the man. (because he's treated worser than if it was his fault in the divorce)
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 09:02 AM
3

We're gonna forget that in the 70's, feminists changed the divorce laws to allow this?
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 07:30 AM
2

Who made the changes to divorce in the 70's that allow this to happen? Feminists!
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 07:29 AM
10

Who made the changes to divorce, making this possible in the 70's? That's right, feminists!
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 07:28 AM
8

Only except "equality" is a mask to deflect backlash and attract supporters. Their real goal is all out female supremacy.
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 07:13 AM
1

Social roles that don't really exist
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 11:11 AM
2

1 person is not enough.To give example, here on reddit the feminist subs are filled with misandrist. This subs rules state that hating women is not allowed, the hate here is directed at feminism and the changes it made. Also be weary who you count as an mra.Feminists are known for taking men who have no connection with mra's and lieing that they do/did. For example, they painted Elliot Rodgers as an mra for having been on an mra page just once.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 10:50 AM
1

Retardation intensifies
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 10:44 AM
1

There's no test to pass to become a feminist, so theones who make the biggest impact represent the movement. And if that's the case, where are all the real feminists calling out these misandrists and holding them accountable? I'll tell you!Nowhere to be seen, because feminism is and always was a hate movement.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 10:16 AM
1

And your point is bs. The people in the movement define the movement (with their actions), not the other way around.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 10:11 AM
2

You can't dismiss the leaders as just a small minority not representative of the group that follows them.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 10:09 AM
1

Just what I tought, too retarded to realize that there are only 2 genders assigned at birth and that sexuality around children messes up their mental state. These are are obvious facts that should be just common sense, but of course, there are people like you with a patato for a brain making up some ridiculous nonsense and then believing it.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 08:07 AM
1

The things you lgbtq believe are on par with flat-earthers.
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/22 10:12 PM
1

That there are 70+ genders you can freely switch between and that bringing up sexuality around pre-pubescent kids is ok? Why you making me repeat myself?
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/22 10:12 PM
5

"Equality" is a mask to deflect backlash. If you look at their actions, you'll see that it all points towards female supremacy. Just the basis of the movement is the same as the nazis. An oppressed class (germans and women) and an oppressor class (jews and men) having a secret society (jewish world conspiracy and patriarchy).
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/22 10:09 PM
6

How is it a minority when all the major organisations and icons of the movement fit the worst stereotypes?
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/22 10:06 PM
1

Well, you sure believe a lot of retarded stuff.
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/22 10:03 PM
8

"...of abuse I've husbands that could be don't nothing about." Sums up the average intelligence of a feminism. What we always needed was true equality, not female supremacy.Replacing a problem (which I doubt there was and they're not lieing to get supporters) with another is not solving it. You fix inequality by aiming for equality, not to reverse the inequality.And you'd aim for equality if that's what you actually wanted. No, feminism was never needed.Egalitarian values were and are. Now I'm e…
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/22 10:00 PM
12

And in the divorce the man gets stripped of everything he has, or even forced into poverty. You can thank feminism for changing the divorce laws to be this way in yhe 70's.
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/22 03:56 PM
1

Take your own advice.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 01:52 PM
1

I said that about trans and the 70+ and no gender squad who thinks pre-puberty is an appropriate age to bring up such a subject.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 01:52 PM
1

A "loud minority" that leads and represents the movement.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 11:52 AM
1

Nice strawman.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 11:51 AM
1

ACTIONS MATTER, NOT WORDS. I DONT GIVE A FUCK THAT THEY SAY THEY'RE FOR EQUALITY WHEN THEY ACTIVELY FIGHT FOR CHANGES THAT LEAD TO FEMALE SUPREMACY. Like I had already stated.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 11:20 AM
3

Nice projection. But, well, what can you expect from someone with the username imqueer other than complete mental retardation.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 11:18 AM
1

None of thise mra's get to lead the movement, unlike feminists. And no, I don't care about your definition, feminism is female supremacy nazism.Actions matter, not words, and that's what actions point to.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 09:50 PM
2

*"Teaching" them ilogical bs, making them think they're something else than what they are and causing significant psychological damage (because bringing up sex around kids is proven to f them up) There, fixed it!
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 09:47 PM
14

The thing is that feminists will call anyone disagreeing with them misoginysts, even if they're objectively not.Which is what we don't like. We opposse undenyable misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:04 PM
2

It's not just cosmetic tho, it cause significant trauma and sensory loss.(the "health benefits" argument was given birth to by a faulty study made by a few highly religious jews and muslims)
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 03:21 PM
5

4-10 years old, yeah that's when we need to teach people about sex and sexuality and indoctrinate them to think that there are 70 smh genders you can choose from.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 12:03 PM
1

NOW, the biggest feminist organisation, fought against gender neutral rape and dv laws as well as other such things in many countries, etc. You mean to tell me that the biggest and most influential feminist icons and organisations are not feminist? Andrea Dworkin, publicly stated that she gets off to men being abused. The scum manifesto, a book which states that comparing a man to an animal is flattering him, as he is nothing more than a walking dildo. metoo and believeallwomen, which got tons o…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 10:40 AM
1

They get shit on because the norm is for women to get offended when something is expected from them. Or because they're so high, no man who would look at them can achieve.(because the 0.01% that do have better options)
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 10:26 AM
1

They're the same thing.Misandrism is the basis of feminism. Don't try to deny it, I can back it up.Sally Miller Gearhart for example, started gender studies and kill all men. I can write an essay proving they're the same.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 10:24 AM
1

Being strong and fighting to make it work can only end one way with the current laws and female mindset:badly.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 08:13 AM
3

Like, weren't you the one bitching here about men having requirements and baselessly assuming we're not ok with any for ourselves?
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 09:44 PM
3

Haven't women made it clear that it is unacceptable to expect anything from them? And haven't I said that I don't see a problem with it as long as the give something back? Take your own advice.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 09:42 PM
5

In this world it's considered bad to expect that even if she doesn't work.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 09:35 PM
4

I wasn't reffering to being a truly strong and independent woman.That can actually arouse some guys. I was reffering to the feminist way, being a man-hating bitch and thinking that makes you strong and independent while living off of men's work (either directly or indirectly) and being easily thrown into a tantrum by the smallest inconvenience.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 09:32 PM
6

As long as she brings something worthwhile to the table, no. But a woman who expects you to do the dishes after coming home from work is unattractive.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 09:27 PM
15

If you give that list to straight men, 99% at least will tell you that those traits are desirable. Stronk indapandent wamen are not attractive. Stfu.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 03:05 PM
14

You mean to tell me that they don't scream in pain during the procedure (with no exception)?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:07 AM
12

Of course, you can't miss something you never had, that doesn't mean it ain't better with. The foreskin is fused to the glans in the lower part, when you cut that, you lose 80% of the nerves, as that's where they're concentrated. You may still be able to get off, but not even nearly as well as an uncut man.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:05 AM
10

Except circumcision is a barbaric ritual with no purpose.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:59 AM
16

He's talking about how men are forced to pay for the children.Aka, take their responsability for the pregnancy, which for women is carrying to term and raising in this society.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:54 AM
3

Let's forget about nature and it's dangers and the fact men built and maintain all this infrastructure that keeps them safe from it. The other one, switch genders and they lose their minds.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 07:38 AM
3

Don't call them ladies tho, that's like calling a man who thinks women's only purpose should be to serve men a gentleman.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 08:40 PM
16

No one caring/being aware/being a crybaby living in fear of the possibility != it doesn't happen.
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 07:39 PM
8

They're the same thing.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:31 PM
-4

I don't understand? Why tf is this here? I don't even see how this is narcissistic behaviour. Is this a troll post by a feminist with an alt trying to get us banned?
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 10:42 AM
7

1.Wrong.Majority cases are unknown and just as many are proven true as false. 2."Rape is not the norm.It doesn't happen often.It's a non issue you're creating to just hate on men." We can play that game too.Does that make it ok?No.A problem is a problem and needs to be taken seriously regardless of how rare it is.
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 08:04 AM
–

YaLL aRe CrAngE pEsSBaByS.grO aP.FAmoNesM 4 tHA Winner Winner Chicken dinner.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 05:32 PM
4

Explain.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:28 PM
4

To burn men alive?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:28 PM
6

Burnt alive, but ok the next morning?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:26 PM
6

It's made for comedy.Switch genders and no one would find it funny.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:22 PM
9

It's made for comedy.Switch genders and no one would find it funny.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:21 PM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/if%20not Look at the example for the first meaning.If the first isn't true, the one after "if not" is. Exactly what I said. Meaning she said that if women aren't a social minority(whatever tf that made up bs means), they are a numerical one.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:07 PM
1

I'd say the same to you.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:03 PM
2

You're the one that failed to understand it. "It's smh If not smh else" means that if it's not the smh, it's the smh else.(In this case the first is obviously bs)You said she didn't say the smh else is true when all she did say with this is that it is. You were talking about irony.Well this is ironic, cause you're accussing me of what you're guilty of.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 02:14 PM
2

I'm more skilled than you tho.I was off on one letter, while you, on the whole meaning of a phrase.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:58 PM
1

Does that change that you were completely wrong thinking she said women are not a numerical minority?No.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:55 PM
2

Nah, just an insufferable overgrown child.That's what you are.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:18 PM
–

Feminism is very powerful and is very common to hear feminists wanting that? Where do you hear men saying we should take women's rights? Projection much?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:17 PM
1

"If not a numerical minority"<- author's words. This means the author doubts that it's not a numerical minority.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:15 PM
1

Doesn't change the fact that you understood that it's not like that when the person actually said it is like that.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:13 PM
1

Typing fast on mobile and not my first language
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:12 PM
4

You quite litterally proved yourself to be illiterate.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 05:38 PM
7

The lack of YOUR critical thinking and reading skill. It says "social minority if not a numerical minority", pointing to the speaker thinking it is that if not, making op's point relevant. Really tought you had a gotcha moment, didn't you?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 05:35 PM
3

Yeah, name?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 05:04 PM
6

Can I see it?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 03:23 PM
3

For murder, men are 4 times more likely to be victims. For rape,it is specifically defined as something a man does to a woman.In the rare places or times in which it wasn't, it was equal. You tought you had a gotcha moment, didn't you?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 03:18 PM
1

You only do good things for that gender, always. And in a discriminatory manner.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 02:09 PM
3

You don't hear about it because no one cares, not because it doesn't happen.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 01:26 PM
4

It's way more than that and both are responsabilities resulting from pregnancy, so they are equivalent.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 11:49 AM
5

So the right to opt out of the responsability resulted from a pregnancy. Men never had this right, we always had to pay or go to jail. You said you wanted equality, right?Well, banning abortion is a step towards true equality. Anything else?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 09:52 AM
2

He already answered that.
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 05:58 PM
3

The feminist icons? Like Sally Miller Gearhart?Who started KAM and gender studies. Or maybe Andrea Dworkin?Who gets off on seeing men abused? The author of the scum manifesto?Which states that comparing a man to an animal is flattering him as he is nothing more than a walking dildo? And is mandatory reading in gender studies? The "lady" who killed Andy Warhol in the name of KAM and then instead of being punished by the law, she got to hold speeches about male on female violence? Wow, such lady-l…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:02 PM
1

1.There's no patriarchy 2.Tell that to the feminist organisations who fought against gender neutral rape and dv laws and established the duluth model.
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 01:49 PM
6

What rights do men have and women don't?
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 01:20 PM
15

Litterally all they did in that comment section is prove us right, on multiple things.
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 09:00 AM
24

That's the message we're trying to send. "Men, never get married, it is one of the most stupid things you can do!"
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 11:21 AM
3

The entitlement is caused by it.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:13 AM
54

Slur for men.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:58 AM
2

Read again. That woman wants him to be the provider AND do the chores.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:55 PM
7

You're not a lady. Feminist and lady are incompatable.
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 06:23 PM
3

What the other guy is saying. Isn't it suspiciously similar to the nazi "jewish world conspiracy"?
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 06:18 PM
1

Don't call her a lady.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:04 PM
13

You will feel much better once you stop caring about women. The second response is actually good advice.Nothing good comes from chasing women.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:29 PM
10

You're not a lady.
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/22 08:25 PM
3

The patriarchy is just a boogeyman invented by the cult named feminism, just like christians and satan. It doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:13 PM
–

Truth is circumcision doesn't even prevent std's.The study that "found" that is heavily flawed and was done by highly religious jews and muslims.
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/22 09:24 AM
11

1.Don't you feminists do that all the time? 2.It's because you're here in bad faith misinterpretating everything and generally saying nonsense.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 04:30 PM
9

It's a gender reversal for a post made in r/blatantmisoginy.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 06:07 PM
6

It's a gender reversal for a post on r/blatantmisoginy.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 06:06 PM
78

Are you mentally disabled?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:24 PM
4

And that could change any day?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:21 PM
2

Some bs out of ur a$$?Noice.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 11:04 AM
29

Helping them out of our own kindness is what got us in this female supremacist mess that we know as modern society to begin with.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:15 AM
3

Actions are more important than words and this is a no true scotsman fallacy. You should stop calling yourself a feminist then. Sally Miller Gearhart, one of the biggest feminist icons, started both KAM and gender studies. The white feather campaign and giving women the same rights without the same responsabilities (such as signing the draft to vote or have a drivers license) The scum manifesto, required reading in gender studies, it states that calling a man an animal is flattering him, because…
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 09:43 AM
3

Well, it just points them out as the crazies they are. The male equivalent for abortion is not having to pay for the child, which we don't have.(because it's getting rid of the responsabilities of a pregnancy) This is "if we can't have abortion as yet another extra privilege allowing us to be sluts, then we will have you sterilised like dogs" The female equivalent to vasectomy is tubal litigation.(prevention of procreation)
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:25 AM
3

*Feminists, not women. And feminists really do hate men.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 08:52 AM
3

As long as the feminists advocate for only women to get this right (which they obviously slways will, as soon as you suggest men not having to pay, you get silenced), it's unacceptable in my eyes and any other self respecting man's eyes. That's the moral of the story. Who passes or rejects the law proposals, I could care less. (But I will say that the stats show a higher number of pro life women than men tho, and voters make majority of the decision.)
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 08:47 AM
7

You must have spent a lot of time in the feminist echo chambers if you think anyone who disagrees with feminism is a misoginist who wants women in the kitchen or suffering.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 08:28 AM
5

No? We want actual equality of opportunity, not the 'men only exist to serve women' "equality" that feminists advocate for or equity.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 08:25 AM
3

As long as men can't, this is how it should be.You wanted equality, right? And who made the decision is irrelevant.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 08:22 AM
0

Because men aren't forced to pay for the child. And because it's obviously so different despite all the pro or anti arguments that work for one working for the other as well. And because it's not like both of them (no abortion and forced pay) are forcing the parent to take responsability for the pregnancy.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 07:59 AM
2

If women can get rid of the responsability resulting from pregnancy, then so should men.No being forced to pay for a child. The same arguments that can be used pro or anti abortion can be used here.It is equivalent, it obviously affects men, and we don't have it. Either the convenience of both parents triumphs the child's rights or none does.If it's only the mother's convenience that is more important than the child, that is literally female supremacy.(woman's convenience > men's convenience) Th…
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 07:54 AM
2

If u get knocked up by someone, you should live with that choice lmao.Carry it to term.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 07:29 AM
11

Women decide wether or not to spread their legs.And if you were stupid enough to let him cum inside you, then that's your fault, you must take the responsability and carry it to term. The same arguments against paper abortions can be used against abortion, proving they're equivalent. I hope you can now see how wrong and fucked up what you were saying is.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:07 AM
5

Feminism is not about equality, those are (obviously) feminists. Have you ever looked at any of their documents, books, icons, narrative?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:56 AM
4

You just described your stance. Yes, abortion is equivalent to not paying for a child because both are getting rid of the parents responsability resulted from a pregnancy. Not being able to see that or deny it is lunacy, anti-science, irrational, detached from reality. Please get help.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:53 AM
3

All I see above is crap.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:53 PM
7

If it doesn't, then it's not equality.Wasn't that what you feminists wanted?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:59 PM
2

Then it's not about equality. Also you claim we're privileged, name one right men have that women don't(men don't have the right to genital integrity, to opt out of parenthood, there's the divorce laws, etc, womrn do.I could write an essay.)
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 09:13 PM
7

*regurgitates her delusional feelings. There, fixed it.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 02:39 PM
20

There was another variant of this with a reply saying: "I think yogurt from a bull would taste funny"
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 02:36 PM
7

You're disgusting.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 02:35 PM
4

1.This was about the duluth model, not safe spaces. You're responding to the wrong person. 2.Attempts have been made, but they were shut down by feminist organisations.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 07:50 PM
7

By weaponizing the system against men?By only having men recognised as abusers and only women as victims?(which means that when the cops are called for abuse of a man by a woman, the man is arrested)By eliminating due process? That's not helping female victims, that's helping female abusers.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 07:00 PM
9

Also, the scum manifesto, also made by a feminist icon, is required reading in gender studies, and it states that calling a man an animal is flattering him, as he is a walking dildo. Also, the first recognised feminist document,"the declaration of sentiments", which states that men are an oppressing class and all the worlds problems are because of them, just like what the nazis said about the jews. Getting equal rights without equal responsability(ex the right to vote without the responsability …
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 05:50 PM
8

The woman in question is Sally Miller Gearhart.Just search up the duluth model and you'll see it was made by feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 05:44 PM
13

Sorry, but your definition of feminism doesn't match reality. The most powerful feminist organisations fought for the implementation of the duluth model, no fault divorce and alimony,prevent disscussion about male suicide,etc.And the woman who started gender studies also started KAM.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 05:37 PM
14

*too much of a simp.
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/22 11:28 AM
1

Facts.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:49 PM
1

"Like it is normalized for women" Show me one instance where the response isn't all screeching "misoginy" and "dis bad". Systematically.How is this enforced by law?How does the law make people sexualize women? Do you even think before you write or are you just parroting feminist delusion?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 11:36 AM
22

Baseless claim?Check Wrong?Check Reeks of misandry?Check
/r/MensRights19/06/22 11:08 AM
7

"They're attracted to.." Why would I care what they're attracted to?Why would I want to be anywhere near those sexist bigots, nevermind be with them?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 10:34 AM
12

All the vital jobs are done by men.If all men dissapeared they would be unatended and women would have no one to teach them.(if even any would want to learn, and if they would have the physical competence).Electricity, sewege, unatended nuclear facilities, etc.The whole infrastructure would collapse. Also, where do you think the sperm comes from?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 10:30 AM
6

What hipocrisy? The female equivalent for this is forced tubal ligation, not no abortion. The male equivalent to no abortion is being forced to pay for a child, which we are already forced to.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 03:44 PM
2

Man: Women can't be blindly trusted. You:WhY U sAy mEN CaN bE bLInDlY trUSTeD!?!??
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:24 PM
1

Of course not.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 11:14 AM
1

So they don't know what feminism truly is and what it truly wants.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:56 PM
6

The very base theory of feminism is anti male(the same oppressor class bs the nazis had), and to be a feminist you have to believe in it. So yes, all.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:01 AM
4

Yes, it is.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 05:10 PM
2

Like women played no role in creating that image, and that is irrelevant, doesn't mean it's not a problem.What are you trying to get at?
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 04:21 PM
4

We're talking about the first world here, that's what feminism is all about.They only use those women to justify discrimination of men here, but do nothing to help them. Lastly, men don't have it well there either.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 04:19 PM
7

Reverse, men aren't being believed.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 04:15 PM
1

It's not who makes the laws, it's who the laws are made for. And all the things you listed are myths for which there is no evidence. I can name more disadvanteges that men face that are actually true, but it's not like you'd care.No point in debating someone so delusional as to believe patriarchy theory.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 04:14 PM
6

Still a big advantage that women have over men, that's how.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 01:22 PM
19

Name one right that men have and women don't.(don't come with the wage gap, been debunked for 30+ years) I can write an essay on the reverse, but I'm too lazy to do that, but I'm gonna give some examples:court bias,the right to genital integrity, the right to opt out of parenthood, not being taken seriously when abused, the existence of affirmative action, the violence against men by women is seen as comedy no matter how severe it is, the education system being designed for girls, significant ge…
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 08:47 AM
5

There's no patriarchy and these are feminist icons,leaders.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 08:34 AM
1

I agree with you, except for the last part.Feminism is a mental disease and not needed anywhere.What IS needed is egalitarianism, not female supremacy.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 08:30 AM
4

Because any instance of a woman doing something bad is fake.
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/22 09:33 PM
3

As a cat owner, I second this.Fuck 'em.
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/22 09:33 PM
1

Wrong, what self-respecting man would wanna be around these man-hating bitches?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 09:34 PM
2

Wrong, they want what the men can provide.The men themselves can go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 09:23 PM
8

That's a good thing.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 10:16 AM
1

Slightly wrong.Men don't care about a woman's wealth, regardless if it's more or less.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:52 PM
7

I've never been in a relationship, idiot. I said "get a brain" because wishing death upon someone for fucking 2 people at once is a stupid emotional response. Think.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 03:59 PM
13

Get a brain.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 01:25 PM
2

The reason why you don't see women commiting those crimes often is the same reason for why you don't see them working any of the dangerous backbreaking jobs. And child abuse was just one example.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 08:51 PM
2

No, that's factually what both do, but of course you are too biased. Do you have an argument, or are you just going to deny mine?
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 08:48 PM
4

Yes, it possible for them to be without being fit trough gender quotas. Aside from that, you just used a bunch of words to say nothing
/r/MensRights05/06/22 07:58 PM
6

Right now 30% of world leaders are women and parliments are mixed.Men get to power by merit, women by gender quota. And you really don't remember all the "if women ruled the world it would be paradise and we should strive for that" bs?
/r/MensRights05/06/22 06:14 PM
2

"Feminists want equality" Yeah, you're properly brainwashed.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 06:04 PM
5

Yeah sure.I've yet to see one being submissive.I've seen plenty acting like they're godesses and men are lowly pests tho. Feminism is the current social norm, and feminism dictates that women should rule.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 04:27 PM
8

I wish I was living in the same fantasy world as you.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 02:40 PM
13

Must mean a vast majority of women are toxic then.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 08:47 AM
2

Most crimes are risky.Robbing a bank can end up with you dead, in a bar fight you can end up badly beaten or worse,etc.Women don't have the courage and physical competence to commit crimes that require it, which is most of them, but when you remove the risk and difficulty factor, they dominate. That was my point, and it's very important.Women have high levels of estrogen, which directly causes aggression, unlike testosterone which causes men to be competitive. Women are not perfect angels, as yo…
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 08:12 AM
12

Skyscrapers.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/22 09:22 PM
1

Don't worry.Decided to go my own way years ago.Modern women, especially with modern laws aren't worth it. I accept it, because if I did have a problem with thse rules, I'd support getting them abolished, yes, but only for women.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 10:07 PM
1

Men can't either, so I don't see a problem.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 10:04 PM
2

Look up who is commiting the most crimes against the defenseless(children)(spoiler:it's women). No, this has nothing to do with your claim and it's also false.It has not much to do with psyhology. Also social science is not science.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 06:53 PM
2

Elaborate.I won't believe that without proof.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 12:39 PM
1

And only the one who gets pregnant can opt out of parenthood.If she keeps it, he'll be forced to pay. How is that equality?
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 07:44 AM
12

Don't call her a lady.Her being a lady means she's a good person(and feminine and all that, but that doesn't matter for my point), which she clearly is not. It's like saying that piece of shit rapist gentleman.
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/22 10:00 AM
1

There are more women than there are men.It is not an even 50/50 split.Many men don't care about politics and then there are the simps, who will vote smh just because a woman wants that.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 09:30 AM
5

Whenever someone even suggests that a man shouldn't prioritize women's desires they get called a misoginyst. Like I've stated, those men allow this because women want it, the law is just as supported and protected by women as well(remember the white feather campaign, as just one of countless examples?),and no, if a person orders another to kill someone and they do it, it doesn't rid the one who ordered the murder of guilt, neither does it mean their intentions weren't bad. If we want simps in po…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:22 PM
5

And so you've proved nothing.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:29 PM
3

Those are just employees, women are the majority voters. Also, most men are simps who will do a woman's will without even thinking about it.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:17 PM
34

1.The men communicate that they see women as subhuman thing is obvious projection. 2.He's getting criticised right now by you for way less, you genius!
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 09:23 AM
3

Then you're not a feminist.The top feminist icons and organisations have proven to want what you stated you don't multiple times.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 10:56 AM
5

It's only like that when it's convienient for them.If something they said to attack men can be used to defend men, they'll go back on it.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 10:24 PM
4

Whatever, that doesn't change the situation.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:17 PM
8

They all trust she is when they get married.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:07 PM
2

Hard to know nowadays.Seen worse that wasn't satire.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:59 PM
2

What he described?Getting completely screwed over in divorce?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:58 PM
1

I spent all this time explaining why it isn't so you can just forget it all? You're too stupid, I'm done.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:44 PM
1

She obviously wasn't some bodybuilder and he was at least average.It's obvious by her story.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:39 PM
1

Proven scientific fact!=speculation.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:36 PM
9

That mindset leads to divorce-rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:31 PM
2

So you deny biology?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:28 PM
2

No, she admitted she didn't know how to fight.Nothing was said about him, but thanks to biology, he would have been at least 50% stronger.(which is a lot)
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:26 PM
1

Is this satire or not?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:21 PM
2

Where is it stated that she works out?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:19 PM
2

I don't see how I proved myself wrong, the fact still remains that a person who works out would take an interest in fighting, and someone who takes an interest in fighting would have to work out.Can't really have one without the other. She doesn't know how to fight.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:14 PM
2

You don't have to get into fights often to know how to fight.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:58 PM
2

What are the odds that someone is super buff but have no idea how to fight?(as she basically admitted) Very close to 0 if at all.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:52 PM
1

If he followed, he'd stay back a bit to be unseen until they took effect. Both the still being concious when dragged and overpowering read like something out of a feminist fantasy script.Both are extremely unlikely if not impossible and both at once?Nah.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:50 PM
2

Average man is way stronger than average woman->biological fact Someone above average would know how to fight->logical fact. It's not presumtion, it's being realistic.Real life ain't like woke hollywood movies.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:41 PM
1

He wouldn't wait for it to take effect in public, and as you said they went somewhere private, no reason to start dragging until she can't defend herself. It's not rocket science bUD.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:38 PM
2

It's just basic logic and biology. I just explained why it's not a presumtion, but of course, ignore that.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:35 PM
2

Men are signifficantly stronger by default and if she resorts to kicking chaotically, it's obvious she ain't some mma fighter or smh.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:29 PM
2

Actually no, regardless, it's easier to rape someone who is unconcious (obviously), so he logically would have waited anyways.It' stupid that you believe this.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:27 PM
2

It's also hard to believe that he could overpower him.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:24 PM
10

Also, the fact that you defend something titled "how to hurt men" is disgusting.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:21 PM
3

Wouldn't he just wait until they do then? Still r/thathappened.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:20 PM
12

r/thathappened If someone spiked your drink you'd be unconcious, unable to kick him.🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:34 AM
1

Yeah,let's just ignore all the other reasons.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 12:24 PM
1

It surely is because of that and not any of the reasons he listed which you can't deny./s
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 12:22 PM
1

?
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 11:23 AM
3

If someone feels the need to say they're strong, it means they're weak.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:03 AM
16

They denied men the right to their own stuff when they introduced no fault divorce.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 03:06 PM
1

Still, you need a certain level of physical competence to shoot a gun well and there's a huge risk because someone else might carry a gun and there's going to be police intervention with use of force(no brainer), so a weak coward is very unlikely to attempt.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:07 PM
1

Not what I was reffering to.(and that's a very small minority of crimes).
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:04 PM
3

Women commit the majority of crimes against the defenseless, men are just stronger and braver, so they can pull of crimes that are very risky and require physical competence.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 01:04 PM
2

What makes it clearly fake?
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/22 10:10 PM
2

Text: double standards on display You: must be fake!
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/22 10:06 PM
7

I think it's pretty obvious he means false accusation by this, in a sarcastic way.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 08:47 AM
6

Sorry, but that's bs.You're either male or female.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/22 02:12 PM
1

Irrelevant
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/22 10:32 AM
1

*Feminists, not women.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/22 09:54 AM
1

What rights to men have that women don't? What does this "privilege" consist of?
/r/AntiFeminists10/05/22 03:21 PM
6

No, but the fall did, which was caused by the punch, idiot. The only point of this is to excuse her shitty actions.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:43 PM
6

Experts in gender studies?
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:27 PM
11

1.Irrelevant 2.Feminists have made significant changes to the justice system, especially with the duluth model.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:16 PM
–

Feminism=gender nazism There's litterally a feminist book used in gender studies that's just mein kampf with a few words changed to fit the topic.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 04:16 PM
25

The fact that they fool everyone into thinking they're about equality but actually making progress towards female supremacy, a genders nazism. I don't want to go into detail into all the shitty things feminism has done because that would take very long to write, but that's the conclusion I came to after a very deep logical analysis of the movement looking at all sources.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 04:05 PM
24

They're all bad anyways.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 03:59 PM
8

They need egalitarianism, not feminism.No place needs feminism. You don't solve a problem by replacing it with another.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 08:34 AM
10

Exactly, this belongs to r/thathappened
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 03:05 PM
6

My programming teacher told me that just yesterday(I show no emotion, so I always look super depressive)
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 09:36 PM
-1

Woah, let's not idolize China.You really wanna live in a dictatorship?
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 09:26 PM
1

Those legistators are only passing the laws that majority voters want, which are women. And the claim that they are male is not only irrelevant(men can also hold feminist misandrist beliefs) but also unfounded, you're just assuming they are with no proof of it.Like I said before, nowadays there are lots of women in positions of political power, this is not the 19th century.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 02:31 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/22 05:42 PM
1

I got a 2 day ban for saying that a girl who started to all out assault a boy deserved to have the boy hit her back(in self defense).
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/22 03:59 PM
10

Female only spaces have existed for a long time and they didn't help get male only spaces one bit, all attempts over the years have failed. Feminists do have a shit ton of power, lots of them are heavily involved in politics and hold positions of power(on top of the male feminist simps), and let's not forget all those huge feminist organisations.How do you think they've been able to make all the changes they made?
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/22 03:12 PM
11

If legal precedent is so strong, how come all attempts to get male only spaces have failed? And no, inequality in family court started with no fault divorce which was established by feminists in the 70s.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/22 03:03 PM
8

No use if feminists are just gonna shut you down(which they will no doubt) If you deny equality the good way, then we'll start pushing for equality the bad way.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/22 02:54 PM
44

Male only spaces are pretty much banned worldwide.(you can thank feminism for that) These same women complaining here are the same kind of women that would complain about men only gyms if they existed.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/22 02:43 PM
4

Feminism=misandry
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 02:19 PM
3

So all those organisations making changes are also not feminist?
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 08:08 AM
2

They should just pay her and walk away.It is a man's responsability to provide for women./s
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/22 08:51 AM
-1

Feminist beliefs usually align with communist beliefs, and this is an example of that, sorry
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/22 06:37 PM
0

Tf is wrong with you?
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 10:38 PM
5

Bs. Those small numbers feminists spout are accusations proven false.The number of ones proven true is just as small.Majority is unknown.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 09:37 AM
1

Wait what?
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/22 10:56 AM
-4

Really? The rest of the world doesn't matter? What have you been smoking?
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/22 10:49 AM
5

Because the hate is not directed at women.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/22 12:37 PM
7

Why? Mutilation is by definition cutting off a healthy part of one's body. Circumcision is just that^
/r/AntiFeminists16/03/22 05:03 PM
1

Name one right men have and women don't.
/r/AntiFeminists16/03/22 05:01 PM
2

I still don't see how that would solve anything. What happens during sex that changes them?
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 09:54 AM
2

I don't see how sex would change a misandrist's view of men. Could you explain?
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 09:46 AM
2

What does that mean?
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 09:28 AM
2

Bruh? I always cringe when I see someone commenting "she just needs dick". Like that will solve anything.
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 09:15 AM
5

It was true a few days ago.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:46 PM
1

Ok, this I really don't see what it has to do with feminism. Yes, it's weird and gross, but that's about it.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 10:13 AM
3

Actually majority of suicidal men look for help first, but find none. But of course,you wouldn't know that because you've been listening to misandrist lies trying to twist everything to be the man's fault.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:28 PM
1

Thanks for proving that age and maturity are 2 completely separate things.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 10:12 AM
1

So you have no argument, in other words.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 10:08 AM
1

Guns are completely ilegal here, you think you know my country's laws better than I do?
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 10:02 AM
1

There are no guns where I live. Only cops have guns in Romania.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 09:58 AM
1

You just have to say some insult for the sake of it, don't you?
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 09:55 AM
1

Of course your two braincells understood something else entirely than what I wrote. I know there are women volunteering, that was actually my argument, that women can volunteer, therefore them not getting drafted because they're seen as uncapable is impossible. Go back a few comments, you said they're seen as uncapable, therefore that's why they're not drafted. Unlike what your dead brain understood, I never said they're not capable, I said they're not seen as uncapable.(and you're telling me to…
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 08:25 AM
0

I have been in fights before. Once with someone who had a knife, and I managed to disarm him. I'm pretty capable, actually.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 08:15 AM
0

Never said I would, but it's hard not to feel confident when you're much stronger than average and you've been taught since you were little to be fearless.(atleast in my country, boys are taught to be brave)
/r/AntiFeminists11/03/22 10:15 PM
–

Yeah, it surely is your decision when you have choose whatever gets the result someone else wants. A worker but also a leader🤣 A slave but also a master, sure.
/r/AntiFeminists11/03/22 06:36 PM
3

wtf? I don't think that would work.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:52 PM
33

The patriarchy doesn't exist.
/r/AntiFeminists11/03/22 11:37 AM
6

Yeah, that's a good reason.I can't relate because I'm trained in martial arts, have been lifting weights for a few years and I'm bigger than most adults at the age of 16.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 10:27 PM
32

I do, I take a dark alley every day when coming from school.I finish at 8 o'clock.In most days of the year that we go to school, it gets pitch black by 6 o'clock. I never feel unsafe, despite being aware of the fact that statistically males are in more danger of being attacked by strangers, but then again, I'm not some feminist crybaby.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 10:18 PM
1

Oh yeah, and those lawmakers have to pander to the majority voters, otherwise they get nowhere, and majority voters are women.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 06:42 PM
3

How does someone with a 6 figure salary get to make political decisions?Hell, most likely a woman is spending his money too, hence the 80% stat. Bussiness owners make decisions regarding the bussiness, yes, but if you knew anything about how bussinesses work you'd know they have to make whatever decision makes money, so they don't really get to make decisions. I could go on, but I think I made myself clear, those are worker positions, not leader positions.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 06:40 PM
5

"The male species" Take some biology classes. Also some common sense while you're at it.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 05:07 PM
11

And we're just gonna forget that women control 80% of spending decisions and majority voting power? It is not those who take the responsability that are powerful, it is those that make the decisions. All those positions they mention are positions of responsability, of making something, not making the decisions.It is women who hold the positions that allow for decision-making.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 01:22 PM
2

Now you're just admitting defeat.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 10:36 AM
2

1.The insults prove I'm right. 2.How does it make any sense that women aren't drafted because they're seen as not capable, when they are allowed to volunteer?They wouldn't allow them to volunteer if they taught they weren't capable, obviously. Given that, the only logical conclusion is that they view men's lives as not as valuable so they have no problem sending them to die instead, which is misandry. Not capable enough to be drafted but also capable enough to be allowed to fight?How can you not…
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 10:33 AM
1

You seriously never came across the #dontdraftourdaughters movement? And you don't know that women are allowed to join the army, just not forced? You must be living under a rock.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 10:26 AM
1

Bruh, you do realize the first people to oppose the bill for women being included in the draft were feminists, right? And no, if it was misoginy not allowing women to be in the military, women wouldn't be allowed to enter volutarily either.They clearly don't think they're not capable, they're just truly misandrist.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 10:01 AM
3

So you have no argument?Good.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 09:57 AM
4

You sure talk like one.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 09:54 AM
2

Proof? I've only seen them do the oppossite.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 08:33 AM
1

"Most often perpetrated by men against women" That's why 70% of perpetrators are women and 50% of victims men.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 08:32 AM
3

No, nowadays it's being kept this way by feminists. But of couse, you gotta twist everything to blame men.Women are perfect creatures who can do no wrong
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 08:25 AM
1

That's pretty much giving up their military, "genius". There are not enough volunteers to fight a major war.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 08:06 AM
1

Like that will ever happen.🤣 You're delusional if you think you can make one country give up their military, nvm China, Russia, North Korea, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 08:00 AM
1

Yeah, because the opposition will alse have no soldiers,"genius".
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/22 07:52 AM
3

No draft will never happen.It is a necessity, otherwise they're not gonna have enough soldiers in case of major war. I have a doubt that you say this so we bark at the wrong tree and get nowhere.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 11:04 PM
1

Yes, sorry for using the wrong term./not s
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:39 PM
9

Men can also be feminists.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:54 PM
9

Let's not forget that they got the right without the responsability.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 06:22 PM
18

You do realize that feminists have and still actively fight against anyone trying to change this, right? And that it's a result of the duluth model and many other things feminists have pushed? And that women (feminists included) have a lot of political power nowadays? There's no patriarchy, this is the result of feminism. You're just desperately trying to blame men for this.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 05:31 PM
9

Everyone who's not a woman, which means men.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:35 AM
11

How is pointing out a bad deal and telling men they shouldn't accept that bad deal not helping men? Of course, leeches are going to suffer if men opt out, but you mean to tell me that being freed of the leeches doesn't help men?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:31 AM
11

Don't you dare tell me what it means to be a man.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:27 AM
7

You say you're no prize, but you sure sound like one.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 04:14 PM
11

Men don't care about how much a woman makes.🤦‍♂️
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 04:10 PM
9

Thirsty, not drunk.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 04:01 PM
2

/s
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 04:59 PM
2

Yes, they most definitely are.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 04:57 PM
10

Maybe not sexually, but it is a fact that men get attacked by strangers 4 times more often.(murder, theft, etc.)
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 04:04 PM
2

Morals and gravity can easily be observed by the naked eye and prove their exisistence in many scenarios.You may not be able to put it in words,but evidence for that is everywhere. Same can't be said about higher dieties.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 09:29 AM
1

It's mgtow.com or smh like that.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 04:09 PM
3

Only except your way leads to a dead end.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:26 PM
1

I haven't seen any,but if there are, they're some huge idiots.They won't get anywhere with it.The goverment needs to have people to draft, no draft will never be a thing.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:22 PM
1

It will never happen. Equal rights, equal responsabilities, otherwise you're fighting for supremacy, not equality. Admit it already. Feminists don't want to be treated as men's equal.They want to enjoy all the goodies without having to go trough any of the shit men do to earn them(like here).They want to be treated as superior to men. You've already admitted it indirectly, stop denying that's what you want.Feminism is female supremacy. Everytime you say again that it is about equality, remember …
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:16 PM
3

Not by any srandards, idiot. You think any country wouldn't have been destroyed if they didn't draft from the general population? If there's a war they have no choice but to draft from the general population.I wasn't saying they fit whatever requirements there are, as your dumpass interpreted, I'm saying it's what got the job done. The opposition is not going to hesitate from drafting regular people, so if we don't, we're outnumbered, and therefore screwed.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:04 PM
3

The general population was capable of war during ww1 and ww2.Don't tell me those were volunteers. So you're stupid and imature, got it. Make up your mind, are women strong or weak? In times of peace you've been screaming that you're strong.Now is your time to prove it. By feminists claims, women are strong, no draft isn't an option, so only men being forced to go into the meat grinder known as war is blatant discrimination. So yes, for the sake of the equality you so often cry for, women should …
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:53 PM
3

Then why should men be forced to and women not if they are so capable? And don't tell me there shouldn't be a draft, that will never happen.No draft means not enough soldiers in case of major war, which means defeat.You're stupid and imature if you think that's the solution to solving this problem.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:43 PM
1

Person, not group, otherwise facts.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 04:34 PM
5

Feminists say that women can do anything a man can do just as well if not better, but then claim women are no good in a fight to avoid being drafted to war. Unlike your statement, this is true. We are not pissed that they're not fighting.We're pissed that they've been claiming they're so much stronger and braver than us and now when it's time to prove it they're running away.Claiming they want equal rights, but not accepting equal responsability. If you can't see how that's not hipocrisy on our …
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:24 AM
15

Flooded, not inundated. I agree with the comment tho.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 09:40 PM
4

That's the intention in theory, not practice.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:27 PM
1

Being a major in such a field means just as much as a degree in gender studies. Maybe it was a long time ago, but we've evolved to be better than that, just like we've evolved to be smarter. The getting satied thing, some bs. And those subtle differences, the whole point is to find the person whose subtle differences fit you best, not use them as an excuse to whore around. Just like a car, you find the car that you enjoy driving most.This also ties in to disprove the sation bs, people find a car…
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 01:49 PM
2

All of those are literally irrelevant except the applying it to all women, which is hipocrisy on your part because those men are also a very small percentage of all men.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 01:22 PM
1

I have seen that part. Idk why it was cut here. I have the picture on my phone.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 10:17 AM
2

History shows us that men send men into danger? You forgot about the female leaders? Who by percentage started wars 25% more often?
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 09:43 AM
9

I doubt it. The situation is so bad at the moment that there's not really any difference between satire and reality.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 09:07 AM
1

A load of misinformation. And both genders can be whores and sluts.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 09:01 AM
3

Yeah, I pressed the wrong button by typing fast on mobile.So what?
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/22 02:09 PM
28

Feminist 100%. It's the exact same in most of Europe, Australia,India,etc. Feminism is world-wide diseaese.
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/22 01:56 PM
4

🤣 That's not a right, that's feminist brainwashing induced paranoia. Maybe not sexually, but men are 4 times more likely to be attacked by a stranger, we're just not paranoid crybabies. Feeling threatened!=being threatened.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 08:54 PM
6

So give me an example.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 07:32 PM
6

Like? Women literally have the social right to randomly beat men.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:06 PM
3

They're a very small minority tho. So small it's statistically insignificant(less than 1%)
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 03:45 PM
1

Of course everyone has seen more than 1 person whose body they liked, but there are way more factors than just that and it's not like there's any big difference between 1 person's body and another, it's the same structure, just different qualities.We have evolved to find one person we are most compatible with and stay with them(and it has proven to be the best approach, with the best results, obviously because that's the way nature designed us)(not to mention that having multiple partners is sci…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 03:25 PM
4

Fd stratpros is. fds is for real. There's also diabla and fourthwave women, which are even worser.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 11:41 AM
1

Like the claim that people can be attrected to multiple people is defensible. It's such a shame that idiots like you have a voice.Back in the day you'd get rightfully laughed at if you suggested any of these woke stupidities. What do you think monogamy came to existence from?Evolution. If polyamory was the way, we wouldn't be having this discussion, we would have evolved to be polyamorous, not so monogamous that we go out of our way to make it official. And really, wtf is your problem?No one sto…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 08:56 AM
1

What a load of bs. Fk this woke shit. "This is completely made-up, indefensible claptrap"->projection
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 08:44 AM
1

Bruh.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 11:23 PM
0

Don't call me "babe".I don't even know you. I bet you'd call me creepy if I did the same.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 11:20 PM
26

I hope you never have kids.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 11:18 PM
4

You have no idea how many things are viewed as ok when done by women but not by men.Way more.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 11:12 PM
6

Yes, of course. Any interaction aside from "No thanks" is. I already said that not resisting the tease is failing. Nothing I said implied that it only applies to one gender.Can you point me to where the language I used wasn't gender neutral?
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 11:06 PM
0

That's exactly what you said I said that people view getting kicked in the balls as funny.You said it's false.I linked you a video of multiple instances where it's portrayed as funny in the media. The last two words:Nice projection.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 10:44 PM
4

The purpose of these parties is to tease you with what you are giving up and test if you can be wilfully married. You give in (like she did here), you fail.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:16 PM
4

Just because you're a slut doesn't mean we all are. The concept of finding a person that fits you best and sticking with them and making something special together is far more appealing than just fuck and forget.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 07:57 PM
1

I litterally spent less than a minute to find that video. Why is it taking you so long to give me a link if laughing at women's pain is so much more common?
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 07:19 PM
1

I lost interest in this conversation long ago, and let's be real here, if you had any basis you would have showed it by now. If you really never seen a scene where ball-kicking is portrayed as funny in the media, you must be blind. https://youtu.be/_dvj2fN-tUw Just one out of thousands of results.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 07:00 PM
1

Nice projection.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 06:54 PM
1

Are you gonna link me those groups that apparently are so common but I never came across or keep spouting nonsense that leads nowhere?
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 06:52 PM
1

You're blind. That's all I've got to say.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 06:46 PM
1

That's an insult to you?Pathetic attempt at a gotcha moment. The rest is all bs lies. I'm gonna need some proof, because all my life I've only come across the oppossite of what you're claiming.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 06:39 PM
10

WTF? Yeah we need to abolish monogamy because cheap whores exist.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 06:21 PM
1

How many assumptions that can't be proven. Women's health not being taken seriously?There are a bunch of screening programs for women's health and none for men. These groups you talk about.Where?In your head? "People don't laugh at men getting kicked in the nuts" That's why it's the most used thing in comedy shows? Simpathy laughing?wtf? Nice assumption that if that's what I'm talking about now means that's the worst of my problems. Your comment reeks of misinformation. You just pulled that out …
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 06:18 PM
1

Nope, you're wrong. We advocate for true equality, not female supremacy masked as equality(which is what feminists advocate for)
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 05:10 PM
2

There were bills suggesting that women should also be drafted that were denied because of feminist outrage and it was initially meant to have women eligible for the draft, it was only changed because women were afraid of going to war and would've rather not be able to vote.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 05:01 PM
1

Give me an example of someone laughing at a woman's pain(especially pain only women experience).I've yet to see that even once in my life.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 04:58 PM
1

It doesn't disprove anything I said. And women didn't receive the corresponding responsability which makes it unfair.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 04:56 PM
2

The suffragetes were disbanded 4 years before women got the right to vote and it was only the rich who were allowed to vote before(regardless of gender) It was the poor men who were angry that they were expected to die for the country but had no say in politics and got the vote for everyone. Feminists lie about the present (ex:the wage gap), why wouldn't the lie about the past?
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 04:45 PM
1

The measurement unit for pain.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 03:16 PM
2

You like completely missed my point. My point was you wouldn't laugh if the genders were reversed and this was the closest comparison(because women don't have balls) and I gave the stats so you don't go saying "but it's not as serious"
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 03:16 PM
2

It can cause testicular contorsion which cause infertility. And does that mean it should be ok?Just because it only hurts means it is funny and there's nothing wrong with kicking a man's balls? Anyone with 2 braincells would agree that no violence is acceptable and no injury or pain is funny, unfortunately, many don't have at least 2 braincells, but they do have a bias favoring women.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 01:45 PM
7

Is that why nobody laughs when women get hit or give birth? Is that why the pain seen as the funniest is one that only men can experience?
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 01:14 PM
1

That was the result I got.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 01:10 PM
4

Giving birth is 57 del while getting kicked in the nuts is over 9000. Would you laugh at a woman giving birth, you misandrist hypocrite?
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 12:51 PM
3

It's not her we fear, it's the system. System that is enabled by people like you. You are the problem.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:38 AM
1

Because not wanting to have to fear women means we want women to fear men-feminist logic 101 Also, defending yourself against an abusive woman is how you end up in jail.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:36 AM
7

50% of marriages end in divorce and 97% of divorces have the man suffer, and false allegations are not any rarer than true ones. It's not paranoia when they really are out to get you.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:26 AM
4

As just one example: no fault divorce is one thing that happened brcause of feminism and hurts men a lot(the biased family court and alimony included) I could write an essay if I had the time.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 06:11 PM
6

The oppressed and oppressor class theory. Jewish world conspiracy and patriarchy. Yeah, definitely different.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:46 PM
5

Is that why they only push for things that benefit women at the expense of men and why their theory has so many similarities with nazism?
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:43 PM
7

No one is stopping them, no need to rally.They're just not forced.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:41 PM
6

Those are volunteers and a very small minority. There's a difference between forced and voluntarily.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:40 PM
3

You got an argument? Or just childish personal insults?
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 04:54 PM
2

Pain is measured in del. Child birth is 57 del, while getting kicked in the balls is over 9000. But yeah, it's child birth that's so bad it can't even be compared.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 02:29 PM
2

It is a scientific fact that a kick to the balls hurts like 3 child births and 25 broken bones at once. Stfu ignorant misandrist woman.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 02:26 PM
4

No, but it looks like you are.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:00 PM
3

No true scotsman fallacy. Should really be renamed to no true feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 09:21 AM
14

Don't tell me what a real man is, you'd kill yourself the same year if you had to live as one of us. Your father sounds like a doormat, working and doing chores.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 09:12 AM
1

Actions matter, not words. Fk your definition. Of course the definition of nazism in nazi germany is going to be positive. Fk off with your no true scotsman fallacy. Lastly, if feminism is equality, then 1.why the name?2.Where are all the good ones?Nowhere to be seen. 3.why the language that's derogatory to the male gender?
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:04 AM
2

I agree with you you, but the word is flooded, not inundated. Român, nu? Nu cred că mai este vreo limbă unde se zice inundație.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:32 PM
2

Dude, east european women are just as horrible.It's the man that are not so tolerant of their feminism. You put them in female supremacy tolerant enviroment and they're gonna be just as bad. These ideas come naturally to women.Bad women aren't a result of feminism, feminism is a result of bad women.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:29 PM
1

*Feminists, not false feminists. Feminism is a genders nazism and that is obvious in their actions.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:23 PM
1

*Feminists not false feminists. Feminism is female supremacy.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:16 PM
4

*perceived as Not that we should be.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:04 PM
8

Please stop using the term "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:00 PM
3

No one is forcing them to leave or stay. The majority leave and those few that stay are in non-combat roles. Men are not allowed to leave.They are forced into combat roles. And yes,don't lie to yourself, feminists support male only drafting, they fought to keep it that way multiple times.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 06:48 PM
2

What makes you think that? It's not something unheard of for women to be like that.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:53 AM
1

Insults is all you got? What does it matter that it's bait post?They upvoted it and agreed with the sentiment.It is what they think. You got anything to say about that?Except childish personal insults.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:59 PM
1

Even if it's bait post, they felt for it, they agree with it.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:43 PM
3

Is that a reference to the impotent rage cartoon from gta 5?
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 04:16 PM
2

You do realize that's not even one of us, right?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 07:02 PM
6

It could, but it seems they're inactive.I heard that 3 out of the five sub mods haven't been on reddit for over a year.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 11:38 PM
9

It's a feminist troll trying to make the sub look bad, making new accounts, posting this and using it as proof that the sub needs to be banned.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 10:39 PM
2

Did you know that the suffragetes were disbanded 4 years before women got the vote?There's no way feminism won the vote. They lie about the present, what makes you think they'd be truthful about the past?
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 11:52 AM
1

Women can't endure more pain. Quite the opposite.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 11:45 AM
5

Please take this man-hating crap somewhere else.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 07:29 PM
4

Fuck the term "toxic masculinity"
/r/MensRights16/02/22 07:01 PM
1

It's not about what you want, equal rights without equal responsability is not equality.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 10:23 AM
0

Only except the jokes about men are not jokes, they just claim there are to shut people up when there's any backlash.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 09:53 AM
7

We can in theory, but not in practice. It's impossible in practice.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 09:49 AM
0

Well rape is one of the if not the rarest crime.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 09:20 AM
1

Feminist leaders are such bitches and worse. Nice no true scotsman fallacy as well.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:10 AM
10

0.06% more likely.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:53 AM
3

The facts are faked.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 09:16 AM
5

Feminists lie about the present, why wouldn't they lie about the past. For example, the suffragetes, the ones who suppossedly got women the vote. They were disbanded 4 years before women got the vote and ran the white feather campaign. Also, did you read the foundational text?"the declaration of sentiments" 1848 it's on par with mein kampf.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 09:15 AM
6

No, what you clearly don't understand is that men get paid more overall not for the same thing.Feminists show the earnings and then lie that it's a a difference for the same work, when in reality that's the overall earnings of everyone no matter of hours worked,performance or even field. There is not and never was a wage gap, it's a lie meant to allow women to get the same pay while working less.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:12 PM
10

You mean the earnings gap presented as a wage gap that is closed by overpaying women. Also, just stop it.Don't reply, this is a waste of time.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:14 PM
9

No, you're full of shit. The wage gap was debunked over 30 years ago. Men earn more because they work more.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:01 PM
9

The fact that you try to use debunked lies such as the wage gap as arguments is laughable. I'm sure you have already heard(as evident by the wording in your post), but hate men and assume it's false because you hate men. I'm not wasting my time on a misandrist like you.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:52 PM
21

Feminism is not equality. The duluth model, only wanting no gender roles when it benefits them,etc. It's a gender nazism.Class oppression lies, lies about the suppossed oppressors having a secret organization and somehow the oppressed being stronger despite being oppressed. Feminism is female supremacy.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:35 PM
9

Is that why there are 49 laws meant to advantage women at the expense of men in India? Nice lies you pulled out of your a$$.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:19 PM
1

So you religious people are full of shit?Not surprising.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:02 PM
1

Why?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:56 PM
4

Nice projection right there. So all the scientific discoveries about space and chemistry mean nothing? What do I not know?If there is any evidence that god exists, then spit it, cause so far there's only been evidence that he doesn't. Mere words are not gonna cut it.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:56 PM
2

I'm sorry, but what is really pathetic is living your life in a strict way for fear of an entity whose existence cannot be proved at all and given what we know for sure about our existence, it's existence would be ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:51 PM
1

I was pointing out that given what we do know, the idea of a divine entity is just ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:49 PM
2

Give me proof that he does exist. We are a tiny sphere in the middle of a black void made from a combination of protons and electrons called atoms.Where is this god?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:48 PM
2

And how do we know there is a god? We are a tiny sphere in the middle of a black void.I don't see where a divine entity could be hiding.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:45 PM
3

Good thing that christianity is just a common delusion born out of fiction just like all the other religions. God doesn't exist.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:10 PM
13

1.that doesn't adress any of the points and is just an attempt at shaming. 2.that's not a dude.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 10:20 AM
2

And the majority of children who show those patterns turn out not to have dysphoria and those blockers do change them. And again, no, that's still bad but it's not even all they do.You really made me laugh with "yOU cAN FInD ARtICleS tHaT clAiM thAT oBAamA iS hiTlErS gRanDsOn", but I ain't so stupid to believe that.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 11:00 AM
4

I didn't make anything up.That's what they're doing, giving gender reasigment to children. There are plenty of videos, articles, etc. about it, so stop denying it.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 12:11 AM
7

So you're ok with putting kids trough gender swap(or however it's callsed) surgery and hormone teraphy?
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 10:36 PM
8

Children are nowhere near competent enough to understand the implications of such a thing, you delusional idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 10:28 PM
2

Oh yeah, and you ignored my question. Obviously, because there are literally 0 disadvantages that women have in first world countries.All those they claim are demonstrably false.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 09:06 PM
3

And I'm talking about way more than just custody.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 08:38 PM
4

ThA PAtrIARcHy doesn't exist. It is just as real as the nazis jewish world conspiracy.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 08:37 PM
5

1.It's obvious. 2.It's said in the post.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 05:59 PM
8

Also what happens to men in divorce on top of the other things others have said. Can you name one right that men have and women don't?(and don't come with debunked bs like the wage gap.)
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 05:42 PM
2

I will take no "action" over sex with misandrists any day.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 01:23 PM
4

I agree with you that this tradcon way of thinking op and the person you're replying to are toxic, but feminism is also very toxic and no we never needed it, don't and never will. Feminism is just a beneficial to the world as nazism.(they're the same, just different groups)
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 12:26 PM
12

Please take this tradcon nonsense somewhere else. This is antifeminists, not alt-right indoctrination camp.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 08:40 AM
5

Yes, already did.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 03:11 PM
7

Prove it.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 02:06 PM
5

"I wouldn't worship her if she was an actual divine being"--me
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 01:51 PM
33

Please take this somewhere else. It has nothing to do with antifeminism and if listened to would have men respect gender roles while women don't, which is absolutely not ok. Fk being a gentleman.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:34 AM
2

It puts men in a position of sacrificing for women(working to provide for them and protect them)
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 09:39 PM
1

Conservatives are just right wing feminists.They both advantage women at the expense of men.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 09:25 PM
6

Tradcon bs.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 01:09 PM
0

Of course they did choose their religion. And it is not a generalization saying that all people who believe x doctrine, believe x doctrine, it is an obvious fact.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 10:27 PM
1

Same thing.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 06:06 PM
3

Egalitarianism, not feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 06:01 PM
3

There's a difference.Gender is a birth thing that doesn't influence your beliefs.Subscription to a religion is a choice that rquires you to accept a set of values.All people who are part of a religion agree with its doctrine, otherwise they wouldn't be part of it.BIG difference, it's like saying that generalizing that all black people hate white people and generalizing that all kkk members hate black people is the same thing.No,one was simply born into the other group and the other subscribes to…
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 05:53 PM
6

Bait post.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 01:12 PM
1

Those were the sufragettes.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 09:03 AM
2

Bruh.Talk about being closed-minded.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 11:27 PM
3

You didn't adress any of my points or gave me answer. Also, all your insults prove is that you have no argument, therefore I'm right.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 11:22 PM
1

Ever heard of the white feather movement? They did.They even shamed 10 year olds for not going to war.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 09:18 AM
14

Name one legal right that men have and women don't if we're so preffered.I could go all day listings ones that women have.(right to genital integrity and family laws being biased favoring women as just 2 examples) We live in a world where a woman can assault a man in public randomly and nobody will intervene, but god forbid he defend himself, then everyone loses their sh1t.And you have the audacity to claim it's men who have it better? Stop lieing.You're advocating for female supremacy, not equa…
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 09:15 AM
1

Feminists* Not women as a whole.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 12:11 AM
4

It's not good to thirst for women.It will only drag you down.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 09:10 PM
1

That's a feminist lie. There are women only higher education institutions founded centuries ago.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 07:09 PM
1

Actually no, they were actually used to teach the same things that boys were taught(mostly). I have a cousin who is studying medicine at a school in the UK which was girls only until a few decades ago and he told me it was founded in the 19th century.I then searched to see how many such schools there were, and did find more.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 11:31 AM
1

You wouldn't be on here arguing with me if you didn't support it.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:29 PM
1

Such a "war" will mostly not have guns and not follow military tactics. Regardless, a man will still do better.A supercar will be faster than a regular car regardless of how good the drivers are. Also, men are not only stronger when just as trained and often when lesser trained, but way more men train for fighting than women Oh, yeah, I just remembered you were defending #killallmen here. You're really doing a good job convincing me that our ancestors made a big mistake giving women equal rights…
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:14 PM
1

You can, but not as efficiently as someone who is stronger.What I've explained in my other comment is just one factor. Nevermind the fact that you have to move with heavy gear on and gear or not, men can run faster because they're stronger.That does matter.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:54 PM
1

And I don't mean heavy in the can't lift it sort of way. There are factors such as inertia.In a combat situation you have to aim and shoot faster than your enemy.What inertia does in this case is that when you move the gun to face the target, you also need to stop it from moving once it does, but thanks to it's weight it tends to move a bit more than where you were trying to aim.A stronger person is able to more eficiently stop the gun once it faces the target and shoot first.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:52 PM
1

I've held multiple guns myself, and I'm not at all a weak guy. Those things are not light.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:42 PM
1

Obvious lie.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:31 PM
2

Are you seriously saying that over 100 years is not a long time? It is within the time when women were supposedly oppressed.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 12:02 AM
20

Basically all the feminist lies that have been debunked so many times in one post.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 07:09 PM
1

Still, no evidence of that.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 07:01 PM
2

Yeah. I'd personally rather stay single because of this.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 04:57 PM
4

It's quite exactly what you said. You said women didn't have access to education in the past.<-feminist lie. In reality there are female only schools dating as far back as when women were supposedly denied education.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 04:04 PM
3

Women did have access to education.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 03:24 PM
3

That's a feminist lie. There are women only schools dating as old as 19th century.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 03:23 PM
3

Women are way better there, sry.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 03:21 PM
1

True, but why would you want to be with someone who only wants your wealth anyways?
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 03:15 PM
2

Bruh, wtf?
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:28 AM
2

Incel Yeah, I know you don't agree with me. With how you use it, all it really means anymore is "guy I don't agree with".
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:27 AM
2

It's honestly funny seeing how you throw a tantrum.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:25 AM
2

Another projection. Non-retarded people don't start insulting the other person when they lose a debate.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:24 AM
3

I don't know who Alex Jones is. But I know the, rule.When they start insulting it means they have no argument and you won.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:23 AM
2

Again, a projection.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:21 AM
3

You're the only one here who should get help.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:20 AM
1

I don't think of myself as superior to anyone, just stating undenyable facts. I just shouldn't have wasted my time with closed minded dedicated simps like you.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:19 AM
3

You do know wikipedia is woke, right?
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:17 AM
1

Nothing you said makes sense, are projecting and you gave no argument. Also that video is as relevant as ever and gives more than enough evidence.You're not listening, there's no way you watched it in so little time, you just looked for the stupidest reason possible to shame.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:16 AM
3

No, they're not underpaid and all those other feminist lies. Why would companies still hire men if women are cheaper and provide the same value? It's literally that easy to debunk, yet you believe it.Please, think for yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:13 AM
2

https://youtu.be/5nmX3R0qHUg Also, according to the FBI, less than 0.1% of women ever experience rape or sexual harrasment(including false accusations).And if you seriously were led to believe the type of man to risk his life to protect those at home is the kind of man who would rape, then I have no words for how naive you are. Also, rape with male victims and/or female perpetrators is not being kept track of, so we don't even know for sure if women truly are more affected by it.But we do know f…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:10 AM
7

I don't think women are worser or better than men, yes, but neither do I think we're equal "Knowing what we know in the world" I don't know what you mean by that.What are these things we supposedly know? As long as there isn't a reason why, treatment shouldn't be different. The burden of proof on this claim actually falls on you.It is next to impossible to prove a negative.You don't take action without having a reason to believe that action is necessary. Going back to those things we know.What d…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 11:26 PM
7

I was talking generally, not specifically. And your response actually proved one of my points. That your mind stays closed while your mouth stays open.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 11:06 PM
8

The term incel has lost all meaning thanks to idiots like you using it as an insult for any man who doesn't take your nonsensical bs as fact. It stands for involuntarily celibate. That's actually quite ironic, because pussy worshipping male feminists get the least 'action'. Men on this sub are at most voluntarily celibate. But I don't see what someone's sexual life has to do with any of the discussions on this topic.(just having sex with a woman won't change the fact that the wage gap has been d…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 10:38 PM
18

Wrong. Imagine being baselessly accused of thinking about rape so much...* Now that's more like it.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 06:49 PM
2

Looks like you never held a gun in your hands and are ignorant.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 08:48 AM
2

That's what you are implying by saying that there wouldn't be as much backlash if a guy did it.You're saying people would feel bad for the men but not so much for the women.Again, by the definition of empathy.(or you just edited it out to make me look bad)You say it is their right to vent,so you're saying that them getting backlash is wrong, and you also say a guy wouldn't get backlash(which is false). That all ties into empathy. And yes, it is relevant.All those things I listed are normal.You r…
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 04:50 PM
6

That's not only a stupid and irrelevant reply, but it is obvious that you'renow avoiding to address my points and pathetically trying to change the subject, therefore I won. Oh yeah, and being stubborn won't help you in life.I don't care how you take that, but I will say it because it's true.
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 04:05 PM
5

How is being called out on your blatantly discriminatory and wrong ideas on men an example of lack of empathy towards women? Empathy is when you feel bad for someone who was wronged.We live in a world where a woman can attack a guy in public and no one does anything, but the moment he defends himself everyone jumps on him(countless videos of it), women can take everything from a man just because they were once together or throw him in jail with just her words,mgtow(who were just saying that it's…
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 03:28 PM
5

Like you gave an argument.
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 02:55 PM
1

What privileges do men have?
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 09:10 AM
6

Fk off with your bs.
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 08:50 AM
1

You got any idea how heavy a gun is? You need some serious strenght to aim efficiently.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 10:29 PM
3

Romania is 100% democratic(It's part of the EU, it can't not be) There's no feminism in the media produced here.Sometimes, it's criticised, but being a western ally, we have majority of media imported from other western countries, which is feminist infected.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 07:28 PM
5

Living in Romania, I can tell you the majority of women are just as bad, but most men are awake to it, especially the younger.(12-20yr olds)The women are desperate to institutionalize feminism here. Also, Romania is a western ally too.Feminism is here too, it's just the male population won't accept it.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 05:46 PM
8

Aside from 1, which is biological, therefore not a privilege, it is literally the polar opposite.It proves to be the opposite with every ocassion.Only feminists claim otherwise.(but as we've seen so many times, their claims are bs)
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 09:20 AM
1

You forgot that that there would only be half the population, meaning half the labour required. So we'd have more workers than we need. And I doubt women make up 38% of vital positions, stats for each individual one are like 99% male.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 03:12 PM
2

Ok, so how would society crumble without women? It's men who do all the vital work.We wouldn't be able to reproduce, but we'd live the rest of our lives well.Everything that is necessary for keeping society running already has 50%+ male labour. Oh wait, stem cell research is making promising progress towards artificial wombs and in such a scenario it would be prioritized, sry, but looks like we would be able to reproduce.(And before you come with mah bon marro, that was a massive fail).
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 11:53 AM
1

Man, fuck Valentine's Day.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 11:26 PM
12

It does change something.(as this post proves)
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 11:13 PM
5

Voluntary slavery. The defininition of slavery is working while someone else reaps the benefits of your work.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:43 AM
22

Yes
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 11:54 PM
1

Both. Beating people is wrong.Regardless of gender.You're no better than the misandrists you despise.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 10:12 PM
1

You have some loose screws.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 09:01 PM
1

You want to beat your wife? Dude, wtf is wrong with you?
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 06:34 PM
3

That's something people will be outraged about if you ask, just as if you said women belong in the kitchen.It's common sense.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 03:37 PM
8

Only except the "what she was wearing" being a thing people actually ask is a feminist lie.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 09:55 AM
1

It is a and also not a <- surely not a contradiction And idgaf about your feminist studies, whenever I look into them, I find out that they're flawed.
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/22 08:57 PM
1

1.It's just not true 2.You're stupid if you really don't see a contradiction.
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/22 06:21 PM
1

Let the simps suffer*
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/22 09:34 AM
18

Didn't ask your opinion. Don't care what you think. Go back to your echo-chamber.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/22 06:28 PM
6

Thanks for admitting that your movement is evil.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 10:29 PM
6

Pick up artist.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 09:37 PM
3

I think you meant current delusion, not reality.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 10:47 PM
2

That's irrelevant to what I asked. Insulting me won't prove you right, quite the opposite. You really think I don't know that it's imposible to know how many are unreported?Either way, I asked what site you got that 90% from.There's no way that such a ridiculous number would come from a serious study and not a feminist flawed one like the "97% of women have been raped bs".
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/22 10:03 AM
4

And how do you know that?Another feminist study? It shouldn't be that hard to find the fbi statistics site.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 06:42 PM
1

Not only no counter-argument, but also blatant misrepresentation.That's not at all what I meant.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 10:23 AM
1

Are you gonna address what actually has to do with the subject of the post, or are you gonna keep ignoring it?
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 10:20 AM
1

You litterally took the only thing that has nothing to do with the subject disscussed. You haven't addressed any of my arguments.Of course you did, you have counter-argument, so you switch to personal insults.At this point, I have won.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 10:18 AM
1

Do you have an actual argument beyond personal insults? If not, them that means I'm right, otherwise you'd be able to prove me wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 10:13 AM
1

Please learn to keep a conversation consistent. You addressed none of my points.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 10:12 AM
4

Didn't I say in my comment that I looked at the FBI stats? I also like how you assume it's wrong with no argument.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 10:10 AM
1

1.Looking at your comment, that's a huge projection. 2.What you said has no relevance to my comment. 3.That experiment was a total failure.Men are actually much closer to reproducing without women thanks to stem cells. 4.Even if men would no longer be needed for reproduction, do I have to remind you that men create and sustain everything?Without men, you'd be back to living in tribes by the end of the week in the best case scenario. 5.Insulting me doesn't prove you right, quite the opposite, it …
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 10:08 AM
4

It doesn't matter, even if it's true, anecdotal "evidence" is not evidence. Rape is a very rare crime.According to the FBI stats only like 0.2% of women ever experience rape or sexual assault(calculated using the population number and total number of cases.And it includes the false ones) Don't bother to throw some stupid feminist study like the 97% one which even included stuff like looking at considered rape amongst many other major flaws.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 09:58 PM
3

I know a person who has been falsely accused and none that have been raped. False accusations are not that rare as you think.Yes, only 10% max are proven false, but the same can be said about those proven true.The majority is unknown.Going by those we know, it's half and half. What feminists do is show you the number for proven false, ommiting the "proven" and then assume all others are true.It's very misleading.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 08:09 PM
5

You do.There were plenty of cases where men were convicted without evidence.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 08:48 AM
3

SHOULD You also SHOULD need evidence to convict a man of rape,but thanks to the fact that feminism is in power, that's not the case.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 08:36 AM
2

Because men play no role in reproduction.Idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 08:27 AM
1

On average.And there have been women who rivaled that cruelty. Have you ever heard of the creepypasta of bloody Mary (I'm sure you did).You have any idea what she did when she was alive?(yes,she was a real ruler and the myth was born because of her cruelty)Her actions are stuff like: burning 300 innocent people alive, torturing her servants to death,etc.all for "enterntainment" That's just one memorable example off the top of my head.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 08:17 AM
3

Because feminism is institutionalised. The people at cps that had to respond were obviously feminist indoctrinated degenerates just like thise midwives.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 08:02 AM
2

Bruh, "white supremacy" wanted the exact same thing that feminists want, just different groups. What makes you think feminism is not as bad is the out-group bias that men have for women, which makes you judge them less harshly.If you compared them side by side, you wouldn't really find a difference.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 10:38 AM
0

I won't have a wife. Not being single as a man, especially nowadays, is a detriment.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 10:16 PM
1

I was referencing that sub because I saw plenty of posts complaining about women not respecting gender roles there.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:42 PM
1

My parents also have a great relationship. Don't confuse the exception with the norm.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:40 PM
1

I read it all. Please don't try to tell me how wonderful having a partner is.I don't care. There is nothing you can tell me that will make me desire women.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:38 PM
1

Why tf are you telling me this? Weirdo.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:35 PM
1

"We do 69 in a room full of folks" WTF?!?
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:30 PM
1

India is even more fucked.There are 49 laws there meant to benefit women at the expense of men.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:22 PM
1

I know for sure that what's best for me is having freedom, which I'm not gonna have not being single in a western country. If your 2 neurons haven't figured it out already, I want true equality because I've realized that would be best for me.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:19 PM
1

I think you are making a confusion, this is r/antifeminists , not r/MGTOW (the first one) This sub is about opposing feminism.I've been on this sub for over a year and it has always been about opposing feminism, not accepting traditional values.And no,there can be more than just 2 sides. Lastly, what cost are you talking about? I'm benefiting greatly by opposing it, not being some bitch's slave. Women already oppose it.Why should I be a fool, respect it, and have them take advantage of me for it…
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:16 PM
1

Insulting me only proves me right.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:05 PM
2

I'm talking about true equality, not the woke idea of equality.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:04 PM
1

"Die alone" 😂tf does that even mean. Nothing. I'm in this sub because I support true equality, not female supremacy, which is what both feminists and you tradcons cause.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:00 PM
-1

Fk religion. Made up baseless bs.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 06:41 PM
1

Fk society.Why would I care about a society that treats me as a disposable workhorse or a future I will never live to see?
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 06:18 PM
0

"God" You lost all credibility right there.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 06:16 PM
1

Stands for traditional conservative. Basically the people that want women to be housewifes and men workhorses and think that everyone who lives their life the way they want to and not conforming to gender roles is evil and has to be stopped. Both feminism and tradcons are harmful to men.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 05:05 PM
1

The reason there are single moms and all that is because is because what you described is feminist, not egalitarian.That's not what true equality leads to, but female supremacy, feminism, which is in charge now. Either way.I don't care about a society that sees me as a disposable slave or a future I will never live to see.I will live my life freely, not letting anyone have authority over me, and not caring what they think.I will stay single and live the best life I can on my own terms. Fuck the …
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 05:01 PM
0

Explain.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 04:14 PM
5

Feminism is female supremacy. Just becsuse someone opposes the kkk, doesn't mean that person also hates white people.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 04:08 PM
4

He's a tradcon.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 04:06 PM
0

I'd rather we have freedom and not have to conform to certain roles. The big difference is that you want both genders enslaved, feminists want men to be enslaved to women, I want both to be free.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 04:00 PM
2

Well, you tradcons, who openly oppose the concept of equality are definitely a detriment here.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 02:29 PM
6

Lastly, this is not feminist rethoric because feminists want men to respect their roles while women are free.I want men to be free as well.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 02:27 PM
1

Also, fk gender roles.I'm not gonna be anyone's workhorse and I don't have a duty towards anyone unless I choose to. There is nothing more valuable than freedom.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 02:25 PM
2

I don't give a fuck about a society that doesn't care about me.And this is not feminist rethoric, it's egalitarianism.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 02:24 PM
3

Men are more aggressive? Actually they're braver and stronger.If you look at crimes for which you have to be those things, men are majority.If you look at crimes where you don't(crimes against the helpless), women dominate perpetration rates by a long shot.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 09:24 AM
9

Feminism is not for equality, it's for female supremacy. We want true equality here.You should go somewhere else, tradcon.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 09:13 AM
3

Rule 34 is a porn site that claims there is porn regarding every subject.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 08:13 PM
1

I'm pretty sure you're an idiot without a brain nor an argument.Fuck off.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 01:46 PM
1

Projection^
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 10:04 AM
1

Looks like you didn't even read what I wrote. You're ignorant and brainwashed, your mere words and shaming language are not going to change my mind.I have seen plenty of evidence, this is not at all "edgy kid" like you'd like to think.The fact that you have to rely on that means you got no argument, therefore I'm right.
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/21 09:17 AM
2

No, what they do encourage is men being slaves to women.If this is what they wanted, they'd advocate for it.But guess what, they're the ones who made divorce be this way.In a divorce, the man loses everything and he'll barely have enough to survive because of alimony and child support.This is exactly what feminists want. "Equality" is a mask.The definition is nothing but lies in the air.What they truly want is female supremacy(It's FEMinism for fk's sake), their actions (true actions, not the li…
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 09:46 PM
4

Idk if that's more misandrist or misoginistic. That is wrong tho, if it was true, men would ve favoured, but in reality, all social bias and systems favors wonen at the expense of men.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 07:38 PM
4

Projection^
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 12:08 PM
5

It is even harder to prove them false, your argument falls flat. Also, just because it's difficult to prove true doesn't mean they are.That is actually breaking a few logic rules.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 11:32 AM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ouklrg/we_need_to_make_a_list_of_womens_history_myths/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Historical oppression of women is a myth. As a matter of fact, people in the 20th century believed women were oppressed in the 19th but not the 20th as you believe now that they were in the 20th.That alone should be enough to prove it is a lie.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 11:20 AM
3

You feminists keep leaving out the part that only a tiny portion are proven.Those 2 -15 you're talking about are just the proven.Don't just assume the others are true, many are unknown.Those that we know for sure are true are just as little. I have seen enough to know this subject.(and feminism studies always prove to be flawed when researched)
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 11:07 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ouklrg/we_need_to_make_a_list_of_womens_history_myths/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share People now say women were oppressed in the 20th century.Documents dating in the 20th say they were in the 19th but not now.Dating în 19th say they were in the 18th but not 19th.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 11:03 AM
1

Lies.Historical oppression of women is a feminist lie.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 10:59 AM
2

Actually, 2-10% are proven false.80-96% are unknown.Going by the known ones, it's a 50% rate.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 09:28 AM
1

They shouldn't be getting the house that he worked for and they should get a job.At most he should have to provide until she finds a job(and it should be mandatory that she does).Lastly,custody should be 50/50, only if one of the parents is proven to be a threat to the kids should it be different.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 09:08 AM
2

You don't have to share finances for her to be able to claim in divorce, but yes, that would certainly be way better than what we have now.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 08:45 PM
2

You idiot. I know the study study feminists use to back up this bs. It says 2-10% of accusations are proven false.Feminists don't say the proven part.That's because it also says 80-96% are unknown.Meaning the number is actually about 50%. Also, you have no proof that they are rare, I have seen plenty that they are.You won't change my mind with mere words.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 08:42 PM
2

Wtf, I have seen plenty of cases that were not of black men.You're pulling it out of your ass. And I haven't seen one case where it was just misidentification. Please don't come with the "false accusations are rare" bs.I can easily prove that wrong too.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 07:10 PM
2

Man, you're stupid.If men were the respected ones misandry wouldn't be allowed while misoginy encouraged(it's the opposite) A woman still gets alimony and hus stuff regardless if she has a job or not, and the "having the lifestyle she is accustomed to" is just like expecting to still get paid after you quit your job because you got accustomed to the pay. All it really does is force the man to keep his traditional obligations after the "contract" is done.Not only wrong, but also stupid af. Lastly…
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 07:07 PM
7

Bruh, wtf?
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 11:24 AM
5

Just forget all the cases were men got convicted without evidence and those where a man's evidence was thrown out the window.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 11:02 AM
5

Don't listen to the troll.It's a delusional feminist with no real argument.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 11:01 AM
5

The right to genital integrity. The right to fair trial. The right keep their own stuff after divorce. Alimony. The socially accepted duluth model(made by feminists) The right to self defense against an abuser of the opposite sex The right to vote without having to sign up for a draft. Men aren't respected at all. That's just off the top of my head, I could give you a list of hundreds if I had the time.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 10:59 AM
4

Women were never a minority and feminism was never about equality. Equality is just a mask.Tge definition written by feminists. F their words, actions matter, and their actions yell female supremacy.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 10:50 AM
18

Patriarchy doesn't exist. It's just as real as the nazis jewish world conspiracy. There is no proof of a patriarchy anywhere, quite the opposite, women are advantaged signifficantly.Is that what you call a system that benefits men and oppresses women? Just give me one non-biological advantage men have over women.(and don't come with debunked bs like the wage gap).I could spend the whole day listing advantages women have over men, I just don't have the time and you could easily find a list with a…
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 10:46 AM
1

Idk calming, but I listen to hard rock when I want to relax,(that's really all I listen to)but that's just me.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:06 PM
3

That's not evidence.That's some bs.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:36 AM
7

May I ask for evidence?I have only seen strong evidence that they are feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/21 07:53 PM
2

Chameleon.
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/21 09:31 AM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ouklrg/we_need_to_make_a_list_of_womens_history_myths/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Also read the foundational text, "the declaration of sentiments".You're just regurgutating feminist lies.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/21 04:35 PM
10

Sorry, but that's also a myth.Modern feminists rewrote feminism's history.It was like this from the very beginning, just less powerful.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/21 09:04 AM
1

What was waved in front of you doesn't exist, on both sides. True love is fiction.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:14 PM
2

Dude, fuck them.Stop wishing for true love, that only exists in works of fiction.As you said it, women will not settle for anything less than the top(because money and social status, not love) and also those top men only want to fuck them then leave them to rot, that's all there is to it. You only need yourself.Look at who you are, see that you are great the way you are and start to value yourself.Stop caring about others opinions, you'll be much happier.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:01 PM
2

I hope it does.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 05:33 PM
3

That's a social status thing, not a personal skill.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 09:31 AM
3

No, inferior in terms of their abilities, not how they're being treated by society or their status.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 09:28 AM
1

If they could do something useful outside, they wouldn't have been.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/21 08:51 PM
3

Wtf?That's the most nonsense respose I ever received.You completely ignored what I said and went on to insult and make ridiculous claims. You know nothing about my personal life(and no, you weren't right).Stop pretending to be smart, your language, baseless assumptions and lack of arguments betray you.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:49 PM
1

They're tribes.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:59 AM
6

Men get killed 4 times more often and why is it fair for them to have rights and freedoms that we don't? You're full of shit.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 07:25 AM
47

They embrace it there because it fits their agenda,but they deny it when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:42 AM
1

Those are feminist icons.You clearly know nothing about feminism, that's why you support it.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/21 04:59 PM
6

Troll.Ignore.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/21 12:33 PM
1

You should see the stories of parents who forced their kids to transition.(usually feminist mother forcing son)
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/21 10:05 AM
2

No, it's not.It's for female supremacy, like a genders kkk.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/21 10:03 AM
1

Anti-feminism isn't a ideology.We don't have our own theory, we just oppose theirs.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/21 09:52 AM
1

Keep them away from your mother in law. Feminists are dangerous and can't be trusted around children.She'll corrupt them(in the best case)
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/21 09:43 AM
2

Nah.Feminists are ugly on the inside and that's more than enough.Looks are not the only thing men care about.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/21 07:07 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ouklrg/we_need_to_make_a_list_of_womens_history_myths/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Could no longer find the one on this sub, but this one should be enough.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 09:47 PM
7

Historical oppression of women is a feminist lie.There are posts on this sub debunking it.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 09:01 PM
3

Only misandrists deny the existence of misandry. It's literally in front of your eyes.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 10:53 AM
3

Because opposing views are lethal to ideas made up from lies.Also because they hate men and want to see us suffer.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 10:48 AM
10

Actually she can.You can thank feminism for that. There is no such thing as punishment for false rape accusations.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 10:29 PM
9

Why tf are insane people let off?If they're insane, put them in a mental asylum.Letting them free puts everyone in danger.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:40 PM
3

I was telling you that someones actions mean more when it comes to defining character than words,meaning you can't say that feminists are for equality when their actions point otherwise, regardless of their words. You ignore that and switch it to "why don't you do something?".You avoid adressing the subject and attempt to shame. I don't care what your age is, a mature person doesn't do that.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:23 PM
2

Completely ignored the point and made a pathetic attempt to shame.Typical feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:16 PM
2

"Not what feminism stands for" That's all it does.Actions mean more than words. That's what it really stands for."Equality" is a disguise.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:10 PM
1

Gtfo of this sub.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:07 PM
2

The fact that you deny it proves that you're a misandrist.If you weren't, you'd be able to see it. And I'm not listening because I've heard this bs a lot of times and have seen it debunked just as many times.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:03 PM
5

That women get away with it. Pls shut up with "feminism is equality" Your icons are raging misandrists(Gearhart for just 1 example) Your foundational texts("the declaration of sentiments") are disgustingly misandrist. Feminism IS female supremacy. Period.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 01:28 PM
7

I don't care what your definition is as long as you don't live up to it. That unfairness is the direct result of feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 01:22 PM
1

Actually, 70% of perpetrators are female. What you said is a feminist lie, just like the wage gap.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 08:25 AM
1

Andrea dworkin,Cody stanton,etc. Feminism is misandrism just masked as something else.The feminist icons are all raging misandrists.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:18 PM
1

Feminism is female supremacy,not equality. No, I don't care what the definition is.Actions don't match.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 09:16 AM
23

I doesn't work like that.Ideas like feminism spread trough the mouth, not the genes.And many of them have children,unfortunately.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/21 07:11 AM
8

There was a bill for that, but it was denied thanks to feminist whining.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/21 08:51 AM
12

No, more like paying maintenance for a car you can no longer drive and is not yours anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/21 08:50 AM
23

You kidding?Not losing your virginity before marriage is one of the main traditional standards.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 02:12 PM
1

I like how you're deleting your comments now.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 05:02 PM
3

Lastly,even tho most men aren't afraid of women,they should be.As the other user pointed out,it is very easy for a woman to fuck up a man's life. Also,female on male violence is actually just as common as the reverse(if not more).The difference is that no one cares about it.Not only would a man be attacked but also not defended, while women are defended in every way in such a case.In fact, she can have him get the punishment she should get trough a false accusation.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 04:13 PM
3

If you're going to say it's not possible next because men are stronger: 1.not in every case 2.weapons exist 3.Bringing friends is a thing 4.You're admitting that your "stronk and idapeandant" thingy is all bs.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 04:03 PM
3

Just because you feel endangered doesn't mean you are.That's emotional thinking, not logical.Men are attacked 4 times as often and perpetrator rate is pretty much even between genders. I have come to this conclusion from logical fact-analysis.You're the ones self-victimizing.(it is obvious because your claims are baseless.)
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 04:01 PM
8

Like women can't be perpetrators.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 01:41 PM
1

You claiming that men are less cooperative.(which is false and baseless)You need to be pretty dump to not be cooperative.Assuming that men as a class are uncooperative is sexist af,nvm wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/21 02:51 PM
1

Women being more empathetic is a myth caused by women's natural in group bias and men's out group bias, an illusion. Even if it was true,that doesn't explain why the mother gets custody even when she's clearly unfit to be a parent.
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/21 02:48 PM
2

Men are not dumper tho.Men invented everything ffs.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/21 10:12 PM
3

All that on the assumption that men are stupid and evil, which is not only completely wrong, but also sexist af.Take your misandry somewhere else.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/21 12:31 PM
1

Women are not more empathetic than men.If they were, we would have the menimist movement, not feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/21 09:02 AM
1

You're not funny.I'm also not transgender, you idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 10:19 PM
4

I'm a guy.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 09:47 AM
8

Yeah fk you too.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 11:08 PM
5

Your replies are out of context.How many braincells do you have?2?
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:31 PM
6

Your reply makes no sense.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:25 PM
5

I'm just saying it as it is.You have no impact on me.I'm used to assholes like you.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:20 PM
3

No, I was agreeing with you,but when you are sarcastic, you don't use a negation when you want to say they aren't. If you use a negation in a sarcastic sentence, you're saying that it is like that.I'm talking about grammar.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 02:23 PM
6

That only partially.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 02:05 PM
7

Exactly.I was also fat a few years ago Btw,you wrote" like they aren't "instead of"like they are"
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 01:38 PM
6

"We sHOuLd bE STriVInG fOr EQuitY.LaZY PeOpPLe wHO dO JAcK sHIt ShOUlD Be rEWaRdeD juSt As MUch aS hArD-WORkinG pEOPlE" Get out of here with that communist bs And fuck you, white knighting simp.I bet you're the same subhuman piece of shit who beats the lights out of a guy for merely defending himself against a girl.Burn in hell.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 10:25 AM
2

Wtf,of course it isn't,idiot.(response)
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 10:15 AM
132

Weight can be changend.Shouldn't be on that list.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 09:56 AM
50

Hell no.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 10:39 PM
7

It's clear that you live in the feminist fantasy world,not the real world.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 10:12 AM
2

Who even reads the bible anymore?
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 05:18 PM
1

Child support.We do not have the right to opt out.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 09:04 AM
1

Lies.If the FBI says that, it doesn't matter what any feminist says.Rape is by far the rarest crime.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 09:02 AM
14

He's not talking about rejection,but the socially accepted man hate. Also, it's not up to women to define what a real man is.A woman will always define a real man as what's more convienient for her and has no idea what it's like to be a man.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/21 04:45 PM
0

Actually like less than 0.1% are(FBI stats).Feminists studies are done trough misleading methods or representation and using a small test pool which can be easily cherry picked. To put it into perspective,the correct scientifical way is to determine the result based on the equation.What feminists fo in their studies is choose a result and try to make the equation look in a way that makes their result look valid.
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 04:02 PM
0

The right to genital integrity, to keep your own assers after divorce and the right to opt out of parenthood(that's just off the top of my head)
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 03:55 PM
1

You went to school when you were 4 years old?Don't children start going to school when they're 6-7 years old?
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 03:53 PM
2

No feminism wants equality.Period.
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 09:29 AM
3

The lack of rights to genital integrity,biased courts,violence againsnt men being normalised and even seen as comedy,etc.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 10:15 AM
2

Like what?Not being able to show emotion?I'm talking about the real issues.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 10:10 AM
2

That they don't ignore men's issues
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:59 AM
3

Proof.I have personally seen proof that they do, so I won't believe that without proof.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:55 AM
2

Feminists ignore all male problems(biased courts,no right to genital integrity) and also advocates to keep it that way.There is no way you can have a movement that helps men when you ignore all their problems. But I shouldn't have expected logical thinking from a feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:49 AM
3

Menslib is not a pro-men movement.As long as it runs on feminist ideals it can not be pro-men.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:43 AM
2

WTF?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 09:02 AM
18

Twoxchromosones users are the same users who defend stuff like killallmen.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 08:51 AM
18

MRA aren't anti-woman, feminists are anti-men.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 08:43 AM
1

I think it's most likely a feminist trying to make us look bad.As a guy, I can not imagine believing all women should be beat simply because they're women.
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/21 11:25 AM
1

Bruh.Communism is all about equity. And no, there's nothing more fair about taxing the rich more for them to be on the same level as average people and that's equity.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/21 09:05 PM
3

Found the communist.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/21 06:58 PM
2

Dude,wtf.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/21 06:32 PM
4

This entitlement in women is the direct result of feminism.It's the result of feminists pushing în the past(and currently) to make the duluth model socially accrptable.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/21 06:31 PM
1

You tried to use the "but a woman gave birth to him" bs.You are obviously the blue haired idiot. Because your body went trough a natural process, you are obviously deserving of more credit than he is.LoGIc
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 09:39 PM
1

You're the only one who is beainwashed here.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 09:26 PM
1

You are that feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 09:25 PM
1

I don't care if they do or not. I'm not joking when I'm saying that I have no interest in relationships,nvm with someone who thinks men are born privileged oppressors who need to be punished.Your vagina doesn't mean shit to me.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 09:21 PM
1

What are you trying to achieve?You just sound stupid. What do you mean by making a pass?I'd rather just die than be with a feminist. It's very funny how you call me a stereotype when you fit every crazy woman/feminist stereotype there is. Lastly,this is like the 3rd time I'm saying but idc.I don't hate women.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 09:14 PM
1

Tf you came up with that from.Your ass? I don't care about your vagina and I have a great life.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 09:05 PM
1

Actually it made me laugh.You feminists are predictable.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 08:58 PM
1

Bruh,I was sure you were gonna blame the patriarchy and pretend that women are the source of life.😂
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 08:55 PM
1

Bruh, not only the wording you use is toxic af, but that's not at all what I said.But yeah, you hear what you want to. If you don't want to get beaten, don't start fights with stronger people.If a weak guy hit a bodybuilder and got beaten people eould say he deserved it.Why do we treat the same scenario differently when it's different genders?In these 2 scenarios the strenght difference should be about the same. And no,I don't hate women and I'm a volcel(volunarily celibate).You however are a mi…
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 12:28 PM
1

It's both.That behaviour needs enabling.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/21 09:16 PM
2

No true scotsman fallacy.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/21 08:38 AM
1

You quoted a guy basically saying that men should be allowed to fight back saying it's evil. Talk about morally bankrupt. I can imagine the scene,you attempting to stab a guy over an argument and then painting him as the bad guy for defending himself to the cops, and he has his life ruined. I wasn't always asexual.Women like you turned me asexual.Before I wanted to provide for and protect a woman as much as any guy you'd deem as nice.When I realized what feminism truly is for and how many women …
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/21 06:10 PM
1

Please stay away from men, misandrist. I was agreeing with the fact that men built everything, not the weird stuff you're accusing me of. Edit:I'm asexual,and with the current laws and society,I wouldn't touch them with a ten feet pole if I was the biggest pervert ever.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/21 05:27 PM
1

Tf is so wrong with the first 2 quotes?The first one is true.And what are you saying,that a man shouldn't hit back just because she's a woman?Yeah, no, if you're gonna hit, expect to be hit back, that's justice. The fact that you see anything wrong with those 2 proves that you're delusional.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/21 07:43 AM
1

"Some teenagers" You're gonna claim the likes of Sally Miller Gearhart are non-existent?It's the feminist leaders who started that.And the UN is very feminist.I have seen many flawed studies from them.You're blind. Lastly, the guys you mentioned are just incels,there's a difference.
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/21 03:47 PM
3

I agree with you.Just wanted to point that out.
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/21 08:26 AM
6

Fake pseudoscience is a pleonasm.Pseudo already means fake.
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/21 07:55 AM
7

Sally Miller I think,I don't remember exactly(I have other stuff in my life to worry about, more important than memorising this stuff).But I do know she started both the kill all men thing and gender studies classes.She's the one behind "the future is female" and the "population of males must be reduced and maintained at 10%" crap.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/21 11:10 PM
18

No true scotsman fallacy.Search up Gearhart.She's a feminist leader.This is true feminism,what you call true feminism is just the mask.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/21 08:49 PM
1

You're out of touch with reality.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 03:55 PM
2

Brasil?The place where they had violent riots because "femicide" when men get murdered 8 times more often?
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 04:09 PM
1

"You can't just see what you want" Projection.That's what you've been doing this whole time.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 04:05 PM
1

Women get raped more, but not by much,the numbers are almost even,however, men get murdered ~4 times more often and make 97% of workplace fatalities.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 03:48 PM
1

https://youtu.be/Y0arSz31DqI Ok,I searched on youtube.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 03:41 PM
1

It's not true that society hates women.You wouldn't be seeing it if it was true,because ot wouldn't be reported.It just gets a ton of attention when something bad happens to women.When something bad happens to men,not only does no one care, but they even laugh at it(society literally sees men getting kicked in the balls as funny.A well-placed kick to the balls hurts like 3 child-births and 25 broken legs all at once.No one laughs at broken bones and child-births,so why this?Oh yeah,it's a pain o…
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 03:10 PM
1

What rights do men have that women don't? Don't come at me with myths like the wage gap,that's been debunked many times. I can point you to several that women have and men don't(the right to genital integrity just for one example.Not having half or more of your personal property taken from you on top of half or more of your future income (alimony) is another ight women have and men don't.I could go on all day). Both men and women have a bias favoring women(no,it's not just my opinion,it's been s…
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 02:57 PM
1

Men are statistically more likely to be attacked by strangers. Women's fear is irational,nothing more than paranoia caused by feminist propaganda. If you take the number of rapes and compare it to the number of women, you'll find that the percentage of raped women is less than 0.01%(It's literally the rarest crime out there).Feminist studies,like the 97% bs are logically flawed.(I can elaborate if necessary).I took my numbers from the FBI stats.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 02:41 PM
1

All I see here is a massive projection.And the UN is ran by feminists. It's really funny that you call men's rights a supremacy movement,when feminists literally have advocated for killing the whole male gender. Lastly,if you won't read what I link, why should I read what you do?I can already tell It's some misleading feminist bs that breaks multiple logical rules(as it always is, from experience).
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 12:11 PM
7

That's better.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 07:41 AM
8

Don't call her a human being,that's insulting to human beings.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 07:39 AM
3

That's just proof of delusion(on top of a huge projection,from feminists onto men).It couldn't be further from the truth.You have to be very blind to believe that.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 11:44 AM
1

I've met some ignorant people, but you're something else.I have already explained why they are of no factual integrity. And what hypocrisy are you talking about?You're projecting.(because hypocrisy is rampant in the feminist movement) If I point out that x company doesn't make good product, and point you to company y, that's not hypocrisy.What world are you living in?
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 08:58 AM
2

Because it wouldn't be fair? That's a very selfish way of thinking.
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 02:24 PM
2

"Most men feel entitled to only take, and they will find a way to do that"<-projection "A HVM would support you in looking out for yourself"<- your looking out for yourself means his financial ruination, only a fool would support that This whole thing is basically.If she has better finances,she should get to keep what's rightfully hers.If the roles are switched she gets what's rightfully his.It screams female supremacy and double standards Wanting a prenup(even if useless nowadays)is just him lo…
/r/MensRights18/10/21 01:17 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/edyrf5/a_compilation_of_evidence_debunking_feminist/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Look what I found.
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 08:45 AM
6

Then stop calling yourself a feminist. Hell,there is misandry in the foundational text.1848 "declaration of sentiments" It's disgusting. Also, ever heard of Gearhart and her planning to wipe out the male gender?She's undeniably a feminist leader.She founded the gender studies bs.I could go on all day about horrible things feminists have or want to do.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 03:54 PM
7

It describes both feminism and misandry, because there isn't really any difference.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 03:49 PM
1

Take the right to genital integrity for example And stop projecting It's midnight and I just want to watch some horror. Don't bother replying.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:29 PM
2

Half of those will get their lives destroyed in divorce. Why are men so dump when it comes women? Men are obviously not dump in general because men built everything.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:22 PM
1

No, she hit him not expecting to be hit back, operating by the duluth model.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 12:27 PM
1

I know empathy must be a difficult concept for you. It isn't. Of course it would suck, but calling it harassment is a huge stretch.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 12:25 PM
1

She doesn't have to be one, but by the way she acts, she most likely is.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 12:22 PM
1

They don't because they use the feminist movement for that as well. Also anti-woman and anti-feminist are 2 completely different things.One is being for dicrimination of women and the other being against discrimination of men.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 12:21 PM
1

The boys mustn't hit girls, but it's ok for girls to hit boys thingy.Search it up.The police used to and still mostly operate by this model.Pretty much Man always criminal and woman always victim.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 12:19 PM
1

I could say the same about feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:31 AM
1

Being looked at.You try to argue it's sexuak harrasment.That's ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:30 AM
1

This response made me laugh.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:25 AM
1

No, that's a study made by feminists. I was giving it as an example of the misleading feminist studies. It only has a sample pool of 1000 women(which can be easily cherry-picked) and includes staring as sexual harrasment.That's just misleading.I was pointing out that feminist studies are misleading, just like this one.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:23 AM
1

That's not toxicity, that's stating an opinion.Toxicity is being rude, which is what you're doing.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:18 AM
1

Irrefutable facts, like the 97% of women have been raped study?Yeah,facts.All feminist stufies I have looked at were flawed.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:17 AM
1

Can you be more toxic?
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:15 AM
1

History is written by the victors(in this case,feminists), that's not true, it's just what feminists claim.For example, people who didn't own land weren't allowed to vote, and women actually were allowed to own land. Men could never legally harass women(did you even read my comment?) The feminist studies are misleading, just like those used for the wage gap, the 97% bs and so on. As for the numbers you've given me about killings of girls, even if true (which I doubt), is like 0.0000...smh%, you …
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 10:28 AM
1

The first 3 have nothing to do with gender and the third is a feminist lie. Even in western society, now we talk how in the XX century, wife beatings were legal(they obviously aren't now).There are documents from the XX century saying that wife beatings were legal in the XIX century, but not now, and so on. Historical oppression of women is a feminist lie, it really was oppression of the poor by the rich, not of women by men.Don't tell me that having to work dangerous, dirty jobs just to barely …
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:24 AM
119

Never let a woman define what a man is. As for women, that would be stronk and indapeandant./s
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 07:55 PM
15

Just give up.Dating is way too risky at the moment.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 07:47 PM
10

It is 50% percent and no, female police officers (who are obviously trained) can't overpower some average dude. https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/q7lmzm/i_really_feel_well_protected_and_secure/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Example^
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 04:56 PM
2

It's going against the duluth model, which is the work of feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 02:26 PM
2

I really did ask them, and they didn't have Pfizer.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 08:35 PM
2

Then it makes sense she got Pfizer, cause she's not a man, but a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 01:10 PM
2

I live in Romania and no adult men in my family were given Pfizer.While all women and minors have Pfizer.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 01:05 PM
2

It's a female only sub.You are clearly lieing.Your profile says you're active there.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:56 PM
7

You are subbed to twoxchromosones, you are clearly not a man.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:55 PM
3

I heard about this either here or on men's rights (don't remember which one), you can search the subs for that post.I remember it did have links, you can search the subject in the subs.I'm not the kind to save sources.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:51 PM
3

Coming from twoxchromosones and calling me toxic? Self-awarness is rolling in it's grave.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:48 PM
2

Romania.There was a post about this either here or on men's rights about this,that's where I heard about it, but I'm not the kind to save links.Idk, you can search for it in the subs?
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:46 PM
1

Straight from twoxchromosones, aren't you?
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:44 PM
1

It is for real.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:30 PM
6

Just think about it for a second, if women don't care about men, wouldn't it be logical to want changes that benefit women at the expense of men?And what does feminism do?Exactly that. Men care about women because that's how they're wired, that's why there is no movement that wants to benefit men at the expense of women, nevermind a successful one.Also,it's why feminism wasn't shut down and allowed to thrive. Sure, this biological(and also social) programming can be ignored, but it's still there…
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:26 PM
8

Women are not more empathetic, that's a myth.Actually, it's quite the opposite, because men are programmed to care about women, while women are programmed to only care about themselves.Feminism is really just women following their biological instincts.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:17 PM
7

When I heard it, I asked all my relatives what vaccine they have.Only me and my cousin have Pfizer because we're minors, but all adult men had a less efficient vaccine while the adult women all had Pfizer.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:13 PM
1

Yes.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:10 PM
6

That breast cancer research helps men too because men also have boobs.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:09 PM
4

Breast cancer research doesn't help men.Men don't have breasts. Breast cancer research only helps women<-a lot of funding Prostate cancer helps men only<-way lesser funding,despite the fact that prostate cancer claims more victims.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:07 PM
3

Men don't have boobs.WTF?
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:01 PM
1

? What are you saying?I don't understand.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 11:58 AM
4

I was being sarcastic, but you're right.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 11:46 AM
22

Because male privilege. I don't know what happened behind closed doors, but I have a strong feeling that feminist organisations interviened.Also, I should point out that more men get infected with and die from covid, but of course they don't care.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 11:43 AM
16

Also, the Pfizer vaccine is reserved only for women and minors.Men get a less efficient vaccine.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 11:36 AM
124

Saying women are more frequently believed=misogynist Saying men are more frequently believed=fine Double standards.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 11:34 AM
0

Both.
/r/AntiFeminists11/10/21 04:25 PM
7

Completion:but truth is that it's a stimulus, meaning it has nothing to do with your toughts.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:24 PM
29

No,the "women are wonderful" effect is not that.It's the bias favoring women that is inherently and socially programmed into us all. Edit:It's not that women are wonderful, it's just how society thinks they are.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:39 AM
6

No
/r/MensRights09/10/21 11:33 AM
9

Who's gonna tell them it's a stimulus that has nothing to do with your toughts?Women also get wet and have orgasms during rape.By that logic,that is not rape.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/21 07:57 AM
0

/s
/r/MensRights09/10/21 07:35 AM
3

Men don't care about income, but you're right about the rest.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/21 07:33 AM
20

/s
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:04 AM
2

India is one of the most misandrist places on earth.Idk where you got that from, but it's bs.They worship women there.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 07:24 AM
49

"Uncapable of empathy and understanding" Now they think that they know what we think and feel,but it is obvious by what they say we think and feel that they have no idea.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 08:02 AM
14

Defamation.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:08 PM
10

No, the patriarchy doesn't exist.Women are allowed to be in positions of power.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 07:19 AM
8

Then this is not the place for you.Anti-feminism and anti-woman are 2 different things.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 04:29 PM
17

It's not uncommon at all.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:11 PM
7

Eww,that's certainly a horrible species.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:01 PM
7

What is the worst then?
/r/MensRights04/10/21 01:52 PM
1

If you're gonna say men, say women too,please.
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/21 07:26 AM
1

That I didn't know, but I do know someone who still has an xbox 360 in perfect condition and know for a fact that the ps4/xbox one systems can withstand insane amounts of playtime without overheating.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 08:30 PM
1

The older consoles can last weeks of continous playing without problems, nevermind the new ones. Under normal conditions, even a ps3/xbox 360 would still work like new even now.Idk where you got that info, but it's very untrue.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 10:22 AM
2

*sexism.There is no such thing as "reverse" sexism.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 11:37 AM
356

Run.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:28 PM
1

You're delusional, I don't want to waste my time anymore.Bye.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 09:51 AM
1

https://youtu.be/5nmX3R0qHUg The data on the wage gap is misleading.It's an earnings gap, not wage gap.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 09:06 AM
1

You've only listened to one side of the argument and now think you're an expert.It's like studying race stuff with the kkk and now you think you're an expert in race.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 09:02 AM
1

Actually, women are way more likely to have chances at studying and hiring.The whole patriarchy thing makes no sense, if this truly was a patriarchy, women wouldn't be able to screw over men in family court the way they do, feminism wouldn't exist(because it would have been shut down by the patriarchy) and many other things. Why would feminism exist if there wasn't a patriarchy?To establish a matriarchy.They're almost there already.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:59 AM
2

That was sarcasm.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:44 AM
1

Exactly what I said, you are unable to acknowledge anything anti-feminist as logical, no matter if it is or not,thanks to gender studies indoctrination. English isn't my first language either, but for me it ain't a problem.College "education" doesn't make you smarter.This right here is proof.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:40 AM
2

Oh yeah, watch your grammar, you "educated" individual.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:27 AM
2

That's not what I was reffering to.If you seriously have been lurking on this sub for a while and this is the conclusion you came to, then what I said is valid. There is nothing logical in feminism Ex: the wage gap. If it was true, then why do companies still hire men, when they can get the same for cheaper? Companies only care about profits and that's a proven fact. There,debunked. And before you say "patriarchy", feminism would have never been allowed to exist if there ever was this patriarchy…
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:26 AM
2

You're too indoctrinated by feminism to acknowledge anything that's against it as logical.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 07:56 AM
3

Thanks for the laugh.
/r/AntiFeminists19/09/21 07:16 PM
6

What rights do men have and women don't? There are in fact rights that women have and men don't.(genital integrity, keeping your stuff after divorce,etc)
/r/AntiFeminists18/09/21 04:19 PM
2

1848 "declaration of sentiments".It was misandry from the beginning, you can see that in the foundational texts.
/r/AntiFeminists18/09/21 11:38 AM
2

The right to vote, but without the responsability.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 09:00 PM
5

The patriarchy doesn't exist and never did.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 08:13 PM
16

No true scotsman fallacy. And no, the leaders are like that and they only make change that hurts men.1848 "declaration of sentiments" misandry was there from the very beginning. Lastly, these types are majority and most influential.(also running the movement).They are the ones making change and speaking for the movement, therefore they define it. Fk definitions, actions matter.If it was about equality, then the name wouldn't be gendered.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 08:11 PM
10

If they do anything, r/menarethings will be untouched and r/womenarethings banned.
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 08:43 AM
3

It can only be introduced when it's safe-adulthood.
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 07:43 AM
10

It is proven that sexuality around children messes them up.period
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 07:37 AM
23

Is, not seems.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:27 PM
11

I hope she dies alone and sad.That's what all the FDS ,feminists and all other misandrists deserve.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 08:27 AM
10

Feminism was always anti-male.Just read the "declaration of sentiments" (1848),it's disgusting.And was born first, so you can't say it's reactionary.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 05:21 PM
21

Without the responsability.And ever heard about the 1848 "declaration of sentiments"?It's disgusting, it was bad from the beginning.
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/21 02:07 PM
0

You say "don't tell me to not get married", but that's the only real solution.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:37 AM
1

Actually, you don't have an obligation to call the police.You can pretend you didn't see it.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 08:03 AM
18

Men's right's is just for men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:38 PM
3

Not surprising, they never saw one.What self-respecting man would do them?
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 03:33 PM
4

Why are you posting this here?This sub is not for this kind of stuff.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 04:29 PM
8

When I was ~10 years old,I was bothered by comments like "Boys shouldn't hit girls".I used to tell them back "No one should hit anyone", and got weird looks.In school, I've been bullied for 7 years and no one ver cared, but the second the bullies would pick on girls, all hell would break loose.A girl in my class accused me of making indecent gestures to her.(I didn't do it)I've been hated by everyone until my dad managed to get the school to review the footage, and it turned out to be fake.I nea…
/r/MensRights28/08/21 01:07 PM
10

About grooming,that's just something they say to make boys scared of mra's so they don't realize what the feminist movement truly is.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 12:24 PM
3

Both
/r/MensRights28/08/21 12:21 PM
7

About 20-30.I don't count them, but I know it is in the dozens.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:14 AM
12

I only met 1 boy of my age who was on board with the feminist nonsense.(out of dozens)All but that one hated feminism.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:05 AM
27

I'm 15 and I can tell you, my female classmates are all high on feminism.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:37 AM
5

?
/r/MensRights26/08/21 09:45 AM
4

They need to do that in case ww3 begins.(It could literally be any day.)
/r/MensRights26/08/21 09:39 AM
53

If we reversed genders, there would be mass international outrage.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:29 PM
7

100% logical interpretation /s
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/21 06:47 PM
2

No,that's not what I meant, you weirdo.Just like you can't make a baby without a woman, you can't without a man.The sperm can only come from a man.No man=no sperm=no baby.It takes two to tango.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:14 PM
2

Not really, it's just what we are manipulated to believe.Still a good point, tho, because the delusion is still there.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 12:13 PM
59

Because the less rights men have, the easier it is for women to a abuse them.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 07:51 AM
1

I keep hearing about this "male privilege", but I'm never told what it is.After years of informing myself, I still couldn't find 1 legit male privilege. Only one conclusion can be drawn:It doesn't exist.
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/21 06:11 PM
1

Damaging masculine norms...toxic masculinity?That's an attempt at making men feel bad for being men.I wouldn't call that helping men. She said she feels, but she should have said I know.There are hundreds if not thousands of examples I could give, but here's one (because I don't want to spend hours writing): Erin Prizzey is the feminist who founded the worlds first domestic violence shelter(and largest one).She helped millions of women.However, she once found out (from her own research) that wom…
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/21 10:32 AM
2

Simps and uninformed men.Those who already have their eyes opened don't get married.
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/21 10:05 AM
1

We don't want to be dominated by women.That's the biggest possible turn off ever for any self-respecting man.The imagery is there to show what she has the power to do once married.Sure,not all women will do it, but they all have the means to and a significant amount do it.Also, it's really hard to spot the bad ones because most are very good at pretending to be good.(until marriage, when it's too late, then she shows who she truly is). Look at the text.It's meant to turn men off, not on, so is t…
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/21 10:03 AM
2

That's right, it sure fell flat on me.Saw right trough it.Same with all other teenage boys I know.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:02 PM
4

This instinct, however, is reinforced by feminism, which right now controls the narrative.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:45 PM
4

The instinct is still there.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:46 PM
1

Thanks,same.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:16 PM
1

I understand, but not everyone is the same, so I personally wouldn't like that.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:25 PM
1

I'm 15, I didn't have sex with a woman.I also can't do that at the moment because of a problem I was born with.(it doesn't have to do with being uncircumcised and it's uncommon,as the doctor said)There is a ring-like thing (I don't know how to describe it) on the top of the foreskin that keeps it closed when you're not pulling it down or doing it.Mine is way tighter than normal, which makes it very hard to pull down and very painful when I do.I'm currently on a treatment to get it to loosen up.I…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:23 PM
1

I'd feel like a sex toy if I got those kinds of compliments.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:37 PM
1

I can literally keep myself in constant orgasm.I wouldn't give that up, it feels amazing.Plus losing 80% of the pleasure.Also,it doesn't get soft for me after one orgasm, after 1000 orgasms it's still hard.Sorry if it's too much detail.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:35 PM
1

Because men have it forced upon them when young instead of having a choice when older.Looking at everything,it is completely logical why a man might prefer to be uncircumcised, but he can't make that choice if already circumcised.It is "my body,my choice" for women, why not for us as well? Of course there are gonna be men who prefer their pleasure over hers and wear condoms and not do it with strangers to completely avoid cancer, instead of just lowering the chance by getting a circumcision,etc.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:31 PM
1

Basically, the real reason it's done is because of "muh tradition","his future girlfriend will thank me for it" or "I don't like how it looks".When you consider everything, you find that there are more cons than pros, and the pros can be obtained another way with no sacrifice.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:15 PM
1

The downer part of the gland is where most nerves are.The foreskin is fused to the gland there.There is no way to cut that part without also cutting ~80% of the nerves.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:11 PM
1

I'm not circumcised.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:08 PM
1

That also means less pleasurable orgasms btw, not just fewer.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:55 PM
1

The tought of getting a circumcision just to please a woman disgusts me.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:53 PM
1

Your life your choice, but I don't want to it to be worser for me.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:52 PM
1

Not legally at least.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:50 PM
1

You used it as an argument."I can please my partner much better"
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:44 PM
0

What country do you live in?Where I live, it has been.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:38 PM
1

I do remember what it was,and you completely ignored my point, why should men go through a procedure to please women when women going through a procedure to please men is wrong?I haven't touched this subject in over a year, of course I forgot some things.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:37 PM
0

A circumcision would hurt me more than benefit.From everything I have seen, that's the conclusion I came to.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:33 PM
0

I brought it up becuse it's also cutting something Important. The procedure I was talking about was one done în the past to mothers after birth to make the vag thigter.It was stopped because women going trough a procedure to please men was deemed bad by feminists, so why should men go through a procedure to please women?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:23 PM
0

It's not a guess, I did search it.The procedure is often done by beginners(a doctor told me that).
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:18 PM
0

I see you haven't done much research.People who have problems uncircumcised are a very small minority.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:16 PM
1

I was not talking about the clit, that's done for aesthetics.Also, you can't cut the foreskin without cutting any nerves.The foreskin is fused to the underside of the gland, which is where most nerves are.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:14 PM
0

Just wear a condom or don't f strangers and this is not necessary.Why circumcise when I can do that.ArE yOu HIgH?¿?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:11 PM
0

No, those like me are a minority.There are plenty of uncircumcised men without this issue.This is not why.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:08 PM
0

They're both just as bad.I've done my research.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:07 PM
0

Stop using that argument.It's been debunked twice just in this comment section.Condoms or no fing strangers does it too(without the cons of circumcision)and more men die in the procedure.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:06 PM
0

I'm not an activist.I don't keep links for every article I see.It's not that hard to search it up, but I don'trememberthe exact place where I saw it(which was over a year ago.).And didn't that other guy debunk yours?(yes, he did).
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:02 PM
1

I do not care about her pleasure.Women being forced to go trough procedures to please men is seen as bad, why not the other way too?Circumcision would remove the gland's protection, and mine is overly sensitive, so it would be uncomfortable.I deal with it just fine, I don't need circumcision.Also, if you were circumcised when young, there is no way you know how it is to be uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:55 PM
1

Everything is made up if you don't agree with it,isn't it?No, it's not made up.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:23 PM
3

I prefer it this way.My gland would still be sensitive and touch my underwear all the time.Better feel horrible when washing than all the time.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:22 PM
1

No, I'm not, that's a minority.Really,we should punish the weirdo who tells him not to wash instead of the guy by forcing him to circumcise.If you think this is a good argument for circumcision, then you're really smart/s.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:20 PM
2

They have it because they don't bother to roll it down and clean it.They have to stop being chickens and clean it.People need to have a choice, as someone who isn't too much of a chicken to clean it, I wouldn't want to be circumcised and have my gland (which is overly sensitive) exposed all the time,so I can be uncomfortable all the time. Let people make their own choices instead of forcing it on them.Just like how some men are happy circumcised, there are also many who wish they weren't.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:06 PM
5

I'm one of those men.I deal with it.Cutting off 80% of your nerves is not the way.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:58 AM
5

Don't underestimate modern tehnology and medicine.Also it cuts 80% of the nerves responsabile for s3xual pleasure, which means 80% less s3xual pleasure.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:51 AM
2

~200 boys a year die during the pocedure.~9 a year are saved from cancer by it or could have been.You're killing 200 to save 9.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:45 AM
1

If they never plan on using the draft again, then why do they still make us sign it?
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/21 07:10 AM
3

If they never plan on using the draft again, then why do they still make us sign it?
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/21 07:10 AM
1

I don't remember where I found it.It's been at least a day since I found it.
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/21 01:20 PM
23

Don't underestimate the simps and white knights.
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/21 09:14 AM
3

You're disgusting.
/r/MGTOW219/07/21 05:24 PM
132

Sadly,it's not.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 07:34 AM
9

Because they don't care about truth.They just want change that benefits them.
/r/MGTOW216/07/21 01:31 PM
2

Who is Leslie Nielson?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 09:28 PM
3

You're high on the drug of feminism, apparently. I'm against drugs.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 07:54 PM
2

What are you high on?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 07:43 PM
5

When it comes to gender stuff,yes.Thankfully not my parents(I am lucky as well),but I see it often from all the other people in my life.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 02:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter