TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zerael Archive

View 4 posts and 75 comments by Zerael on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Although your example is amusing given the medical profession is absolutely overrun with women (and I don't mean as nurses), I don't particularly agree no, or rather I don't agree that even if it were true, it would make it right to use government funds (or that it would be in the government's purview) to address that. I am however in favor of better education counselors than the tripe that exists now that can actually properly guide students to proper paths, including making sure not to discour…
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:00 PM
14

"There is a public interest in diversity efforts " Says who ? I don't accept the premise, especially if it's funded using my tax money. If it's private money then sure waste your money however you want.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:09 PM
4

I will reply by simply reposting a comment from Karen Straughan, but the the TL;DR is: Those "nice" feminists simply don't matter. The "you" in this comment obviously does not apply to you, as the comment was not originally directed at you. "So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and …
/r/MensRights15/07/18 12:03 AM
1

There are cases of judges throwing away prenups even though they are supposed to be legally binding. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jefflanders/2013/04/02/five-reasons-your-prenup-might-be-invalid/#10ea3ad219a5 For instance, if your prenup states no child support whatsoever will be paid in the event of a divorce, it is likely to be thrown out. Provisions in the prenup about weight gain, hair color, frequency of sexual relations, visits by in-laws -- remember, the judges have heard it all -- are li…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/17 09:58 AM
1

I think what would be fair, always, is to let the patient decide what they are comfortable with. Question, and not in any way a trap, genuinely curious about your preference as it relates to freedom of association. I agree with your premise, but would you also say that if a male chauvinist patient refused to be treated by a female doctor/nurse, that is their right ? What if that that patient refuses to be treated by a Black doctor/nurse ? What if he or she refuses to be treated by a mixed black/…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:45 PM
3

Every feminist I know believes women can absolutely be the perpetrators or violence. Too bad none of the feminist you know hold virtually any political or lobbying power and are really what one would call "cultural feminists", and not the people that actually matter when it comes to feminism. Even if said feminist acquaintance agree that political feminism has become a menace to society and that its agenda needs to be eradicated or at least fought at every step (which is already a tough sell), a…
/r/MensRights27/04/17 12:26 AM
10

I imagine there is at least a CHANCE a judge will listen to your argument Yeah, a miniscule chance. Family courts are ridiculously biased against men and are some kind of horrible kafkaesque tribunal. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXGnsYrA1ZM
/r/MensRights27/04/17 12:15 AM
1

Top comment: "Portland Sstar2 months ago your beautiful ;) next time you want a real date stay off of tender lol. keep your head up you will find the man of your dreams"
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 02:18 PM
2

For example, children raised by single mothers generally end off worse in life http://www.cato.org/publications/congressional-testimony/relationship-between-welfare-state-crime-0 The relationship [between single-parent families and crime] is so strong that controlling for family configuration erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime. This conclusion shows up time and again in the literature. The nation’s mayors, as well as police officers, social workers, p…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 12:12 PM
1

http://contentz.mkt5031.com/lp/37886/394531/Student%20Sexual%20Assault_Weathering%20the%20Perfect%20Storm.pdf
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:13 PM
2

Why is this flaired as Anti MRM ? oO
/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:21 AM
2

http://www.thehindu.com/data/the-many-shades-of-rape-cases-in-delhi/article6261042.ece
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 11:13 PM
13

Yeah yeah, "comment if free", which also curiously cuts the latter part of that actual quote, which is "Facts are sacred". Except not at The Guardian, as we know :^)
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:12 PM
4

http://www.cato.org/publications/congressional-testimony/relationship-between-welfare-state-crime-0 The relationship [between single-parent families and crime] is so strong that controlling for family configuration erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 11:09 PM
8

In this case, yes, but any legal scholar worth their salt on this issue would agree having to prove having received any kind of consent is in fact a due process violation, as people don't walk around with cameras and microphones on their persons constantly. http://www.cotwa.info/2014/10/washington-supreme-court-shifts-burden.html The court had previously ruled that when a defendant claimed the contact was consensual, it was up to the defendant to prove there was consent by a preponderance of the…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:01 AM
2

Considering what I've read online, in the news, and what I've heard in person from feminist writers, pundits, and political commentators I don't think it's wrong at all. Short of spending the next hour of my life googling the countless posts, articles, and videos I've watched from feminists about this issue let's just agree to disagree. Here you go. https://np.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3744qo/dear_moderate_feminists_you_dont_exist/
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:31 PM
37

The dirty secret is that this is already happening, sir ;) http://www.cotwa.info/2014/06/colleges-dirty-little-secret-their.html United Educators is an insurance company owned by more than 1,000 colleges and universities. 54 percent of the claims it receives come from students who say they were falsely accused of sexual assault. A full 72 percent of the insurer's payouts -- almost three quarters -- go to students who were falsely accused. (The link's resource/source is no longer available in the…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 08:40 PM
5

Under normal circumstances, going in for a kiss never legally counts as rape no matter how unwanted or inappropriate. For how long ? http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/30/the-future-of-sex-is-terrifying In [the memo], readers have been asked to consider the following scenario: "Person A and Person B are on a date and walking down the street. Person A, feeling romantically and sexually attracted, timidly reaches out to hold B’s hand and feels a thrill as their hands touch. Person B does nothing, but …
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 10:00 PM
9

Well... http://i.imgur.com/j4PO45t.png
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:25 PM
8

Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:50 AM
69

If she's sickening (protip : she is), don't link directly to The Guardian. Archive that shit and deny her the views and advertising revenue. I'm not clicking on that link, no matter how rage inducing this content might be.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:26 AM
8

Please explain how the Duluth Model and primary aggressor laws applied in DV enforcement is not discriminatory towards men, given that half of Domestic Violence victims are in fact male.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:05 AM
3

The day where Feminazi is an actual, non hyperbolic, accurate description.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:56 AM
1

https://ancrapistan.wordpress.com/2015/04/17/social-justice-age-old-paternalisms-new-haircut/ Social Justice is the Status quo, unequivocally.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:53 AM
1

Can you name three conservative politicians or personalities who are "Anti Choice" because they want to impose their will on the body of women rather than truly believing that any foetus is life and therefore they believe that killing said life is something that should be forbidden just as killing another human being is ? Whether life truly believes at conception or not is the crux of the debate, and is philosophical & moral distinction rather than truly something that can be answered by science…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 12:17 PM
6

-When she finds out they're calling her SuperGIRL, she throws a fit, Not just a fit, she literally says "Wouldn't it be, ugh,.. ANTI FEMINIST! to call her that?" To be fair, I found Calista's reponse to be slightly balanced, being like "If you think there's a problem with the word girl, you're the problem", as a nice attack on the PC Word Police.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 08:53 AM
1

lol @ "sacked" for an unpaid position in what basically amounts to an after school club for which she was elected unopposed.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:51 PM
4

http://imgur.com/ZgyAuuN
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:56 AM
1

I wonder if Larry Summers has ever heard about that, sounds interesting ! :^)
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:51 PM
4

Because it benefits everyone and harms no one to do away with gender roles in society. That is a ridiculous assertion to make without any evidence, and I'm not a traditionalist by any means. It is for example undeniable that women's self reported happiness levels as well as life expectancy is decreasing to that of the levels of men just as they become more educated and independent. It is also undeniable that in a capitalist society, the rush of women in the workforce has led to a surplus of Work…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:01 PM
2

But couldn't this be because society forces them to like these toys through mechanisms like Amazon's category system? No, it couldn't. There is actual research on that, you know? That doesn't mean that gender stereotypes don't have SOME influence, but research done on INFANTS (by putting infants in front of toys typically thought of for "boys" or "girls") shows a clear pattern of attraction wildly differentiated by the infant's gender, way earlier than any societal impact can be blamed. Doesn't …
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:56 PM
2

Or choosing less lucrative majors/career paths, but yes, they are, of course. The truth about the Gender Gap explained.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:57 PM
6

I'm not against equal pay for equal work at all. Up to the women to start producing equal work, that's all :^)
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:49 PM
21

Well I mean apparently one understands what the statistics on the wage gap actually mean, and the other believes women are literally paid 77c on the dollar in a capitalist society, as if that would at all be possible :)
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:19 PM
3

Telling women that they are not fit to be on the beach What an incredible amount of projection. their body is slimmed with photoshop Nope. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/25/renee-somerfield-protein-worlds-beach-body-model-responds-to-backlash_n_7141520.html "It is a shame that in 2015 there are still a minority who aren't focusing on celebrating those who aspire to be healthier, fitter and stronger. Renee, our stunning model (inside and out by the way and falsely assumed as photoshopped…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:51 PM
5

She claimed she suffered daily wolf-whistles as she walked past the building site on her way to work as a marketing co-ordinator at a digital media firm in Worcester city centre. Oh no! The horror ! The suffering ! :( Look at the privilege this rich man is displaying when she's just a poor womyn working a slave job trying only to survive! Unbelievable, really, when will the Patriarchy end !
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:18 PM
10

I would immediately vote "Strongly disagree" to every question involving the word consent and write down a comment that discusses the fact they did not define the word, and that I cannot in good conscience give any other answer due on the fact it would change drastically based on the definition of the word as they're using it. (Verbal ? Written ? Affirmative Consent ? Consent through Body Language?) Impossible to fairly answer without that.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:36 PM
1

While you have a personal preference point about the imagery, I believe the author of these vids actually has a disability or something which makes it impossible/very difficult for him to speak, hence the use of TTS.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:54 PM
2

Yes, yes, me too.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:45 PM
1

You're right, it's isolated only to me, when barely 18% of the American population identifies with the label of Feminism while the overwhelming majority identifies as advocates for Gender Equality. [Disclaimer: I neither reside nor am I a citizen of the United States] We can disagree, have different observations, or lived/living experiences that's fine. But please don't make it look like I'm loony nutjob with an opinion that's super out of the norm. As I linked earlier, the history has been heav…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:24 PM
1

Why is this your understanding of the definition? Because this is the definition. The "believing women are equal to men" trope is a recent thing and is not in any way relevant semantically as the word used for that is Egalitarian. Feminism and Egalitarian are not words that mean the same thing, but non activist feminists believe it is. Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights to enact social change. It is not "believing women are equal to men", this is a gigantic lie that has been perpetuated …
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:04 AM
2

It's pretty simple. 2-8% is the rate where we are 100% convinced without a shadow of a doubt that the allegation was false. Let me use this image from RAINN, which is where the "98% of Rapists walk free" comes from. Their interpretation is terrible of course, but I'm going to assume the data is accurate. https://rainn.org/files/uploadedFiles/Jailed-rapists%20December%202014.jpg For every 32 Rapes reported to Police: 7 Lead to an Arrest 3 Are referred to a Prosecutor 2 Lead to a Felony Conviction…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:51 AM
6

Thank the Duluth model for that yo. Duluth model, advancing the cause of equality based on ideological pseudoscience for decades!
/r/MensRights25/04/15 11:37 PM
4

The body drag in the academy is the same weight for men and women. Then I'm fine with that (though you'll note that some feminists are attempting to push for lowering Firefighter standards for women)
/r/MensRights25/04/15 12:39 AM
5

it's going to be incredibly unbalanced between men and women- which isn't fair to women. And that is a problem why ? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for LEOs, what about Firefighters? I don't give a shit if the person pulling my unconscious obese body out of a burning building is a transexual black lesbian midget or a straight white male, but they better be able to do it.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 12:28 AM
3

So the reality is that you're not an actual contemporary feminist in the actual sense/meaning (i.e. activist) but rather you agree/identify with the ideology that we should keep vigilant towards achieving/maintaining gender equality and making sure women aren't shafted, which is basically an egalitarian (which is great) The term feminist and the history of the feminism movement has been romanticized for decades but the history of it is much more complex than most people know. The problem that th…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:49 PM
1

The best (and what should be the universal) answer to any Salon article really is "Isn't Salon a satirical site?"
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:50 PM
1

OP hasn't actually said anything about what makes his girlfriend a "feminist". If she's an actual feminist, i.e. an activist, she will believe the mantra of feminist organizations. If however she's a feminist in the sense that she thinks that's identification that's needed because she believes in gender equality then yeah, there's no worries to be had. He did say that though: There are views that I don't agree with, and if I say my opinion, we would get in an argument Wanna place bets on what th…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:58 PM
1

I am a French expat living in Ireland. I have not fallen into any trap. I've asked you to name any feminist group/organization (not individual, obviously, there are plenty of perfectly rational individual feminists), from any western first world country that actively denounces the existence of the above myths and holds enough political power to sway governmental legislature and policy. You have no idea who those groups are, because they do not exist, which was my point. Any feminist related init…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:57 PM
1

Name three domestic Feminist groups with a minimal amount of political power (so, not CHS who yes, does rock) that do not believe in the ominous "Patriarchy", the wage gap myth, or the sexual assault 1/5 myth.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:30 PM
5

A mangina is a man who has embraced the misandry of radical feminism and uses it to denigrate and smear other men in a pathetic attempt to make himself look better by comparison or to specifically curry the favor of feminist women. Airport's law yo.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:55 PM
6

Is this at all legal ?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 10:07 AM
5

According to Hillary they were "broke" (in relative Clintonian terms) when they left the White House, but not anymore no, as you pointed out.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:50 AM
4

Mean Calm down Satan :p
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:28 PM
1

He questioned whether discrimination against women is worth speaking up about, and then implied that discrimination against women doesn't exist. What do you mean ? It wasn't the same person you replied to either time :p The person who you refer as "whether it's worth speaking up about" was User-31f64a4e, and the guy you refer to as implying it doesn't exist was 1337Gandalf. I'll agree that the intent of either person certainly wasn't as clear as it could have been though :p
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:57 PM
2

That's not at all what he said, as far as I'm reading this comment chain. He seems to mean specifically that you should be identifying what discrimination actually exists before you go on a crusade against it. That is, no idiotic crusades against complete myths such as Campus Rape and Wage gap, and maybe focus on actual issues first :)
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:06 PM
6

Well, let's bring it on then :) One thing I'm not sure of, if this is 100% illegal, without the shadow of a doubt, do you actually need to sue? or can you not simply report the illegal practice to the Police and get them to handle the case?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:43 PM
2

Then why are you using that as the sole basis for making your link? You've misrepresented this specific argument of mine twice now, so I'm going to explain one last time but I'm done after this. I am not using the fact it discusses the concept of oppressed groups, but rather the way it does so analytically and the propositions it makes about it. I'm also obviously not talking about DV Shelters when I mention safe spaces, as those are actual physical safe spaces, as in where you are to be safe fr…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:41 PM
3

Are you seriously about to imply that there is absolutely no link whatsoever between the Critical Theory framework, the advent of Post Structuralist and Modernist philosophies, their wide adoption in Academia's humanities department, and the advent of principles like safe spaces, microaggressions and the like ? Of course Critical Thoery didn't invent the concept of an Oppressed group, but it developped a specific framework of analysis with regards to how to interpret said broad cultural relation…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:03 PM
3

Thanks for cutting the quote. I'm not saying Critical Theory recommends Safe Space because it doesn't. I'm saying people recommending Safe spaces do so using logic and rationale established by Critical Theory principles and specifically oppressor/oppressed dichotomies applied to culture broadly.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:22 PM
3

Well you're the one who assumed what meaning there was. It's pretty clear that safe spaces derive from Critical Theory put into application and can therefore be used with Cultural Marxism as the term was originally defined. Criticizing Cultural Marxism and its applications doesn't make you a lunatic right winger, as long as you understand the scope of the definition you're using. Of course though, you're very right that CounterPunch would never have the guts to actually do such a thing.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:14 PM
4

You clearly need to indicate your sarcasm better, given that what you wrote is literally exactly word for word what a progressive nutjob would write. This is a perfect example of Poe's law in action. Though I understand. I've made the same mistake on a few posts and got downvoted for what I believed what "obviously" a satirical post. So in that regard, my apologies to you, but this kind of intellectual dishonesty really drives me up the wall when it's genuine, which is why I reacted this way, wa…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:56 PM
2

Lol ok http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sc1pi4 Cultural Marxism is not an invention of the paranoid right. It's a school of thought developed by left-wing Marxists and named by them as such because it describes the application of their own theory to culture rather than economics. Whether you agree with the movement or disagree with the movement, saying that it's not a movement, or that William Lind created a fictitious movement in 1998, is absurd. You are either misinformed or lying. Below is a…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:47 PM
2

Basically, yeah. They're authoritarian, not conservative. You can be a conservative authoritarian just like you can be a progressive authoritarian.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:47 PM
0

Actually it's good that they post comments like that here because it allows us, the community, to refute those and correct them. Shows to any external onlooker that this type of exaggeration is not in fact common thought.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:35 PM
4

2-10% is the KNOWN BOTTOM of PROVABLY FALSE accusations. (As in, no sexual contact whatsoever, or provably no sexual assault) "Unfounded" accusations (No Crime commited despite the "victim" alleging so) is where the confusion lies. If someone lied, but there is no proof they lied, yet there is also no (or not enough) evidence tieing the accused to a rape, the charges get dropped, this will go down into "Unfounded" reports. If someone has sex after 1 drink and they think it constitutes rape, if t…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:33 PM
1

I see it on the frontpage of /r/mensrights right now.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:46 PM
2

Yeah, exactly. I'm sorry about what happenned to you man. Just goes to show how "accurate" those figures are. Congratulations, you're a "Rapist Walking Free" according to RAINN, even though you're innocent and in fact, so innocent that the DA either elected not to prosecute or dropped the charges.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:29 PM
1

Holy. Shit. This is literally the wrongest thing I've ever seen, I think.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:11 AM
8

It's pretty simple. 2-8% is the rate where we are 100% convinced without a shadow of a doubt that the allegation was false. Let me use this image from RAINN. Their interpretation is terrible of course, but I'm going to assume the data is accurate. https://rainn.org/files/uploadedFiles/Jailed-rapists%20December%202014.jpg For every 32 Rapes reported to Police: 7 Lead to an Arrest 3 Are referred to a Prosecutor 2 Lead to a Felony Conviction 2 Rapists will spend a single day in Prison. Of course, t…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:53 AM
14

Nicole Richess, 20, is in jail today, and she'll be there for two and a half years because she told a rape law that caused two innocent soldiers, aged 23 and 24, to be arrested. She told a rape law? typo ? Intending to say rape lie instead? :) Edit: it's fixed now, thanks Pierce ^^
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:06 PM
36

Thank you robot jesus for the sensible human beings still roaming this earth.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:31 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ru7mrzAoWqg
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:47 PM
1

http://www.cotwa.info/ You've just stepped through the looking glass. Welcome.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:57 AM
1

eg. shouting "fire" in a crowded theatre You really, really shouldn't use that argument when trying to discuss limitations on free speech. https://www.popehat.com/2012/09/19/three-generations-of-a-hackneyed-apologia-for-censorship-are-enough/
/r/MensRights21/02/15 10:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter