TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zero9194 Archive

View 1 post and 157 comments by Zero9194 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

CMVZero9194/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You would be right. It doesn’t appear to me that the law makes a distinction but that seems to be due to a lack of enforcement instead of it actually being legal
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 02:38 AM
0

Welp I have no way of providing statutes so.,.cheers I suppose
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:41 AM
1

Once again, if you had Westlaw or Lexus I could send you statutes. News articles aren’t going to include instances merely claiming because that hardly, if ever, gets reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:34 AM
1

Well...I suppose this will just have to do: https://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2016/05/is-it-a-crime-to-impersonate-a-lawyer.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-pn-teen-doctor-plea-deal-20180104-story.html%3foutputType=amp
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:22 AM
1

I can if you have a Lexus or Westlaw account.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:17 AM
2

No, tax brackets are very clear. And you cannot he in a legally recognized marriage without being married. Why would the law care about unrecognized relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:07 AM
1

Because that and Lexus are my only sources for statutory law
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:04 AM
1

Do you have a lexis or Westlaw account?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 12:48 AM
1

Just because you don’t get reported doesn’t mean it isn’t illegal. If someone at a party were so inclined they could absolutely get you arrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 12:37 AM
1

Nope, you can’t claim to be a doctor or lawyer if you are not one either. No reason the legislature can’t add financial status as well. As of now they haven’t, but there is no constitutional reason they can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 12:07 AM
1

Nope, you can’t claim to be a doctor or lawyer if you are not one either. No reason the legislature can’t add financial status as well. As of now they haven’t, but there is no constitutional reason they can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 12:06 AM
1

A witnesses testimony is sufficient to get a warrant, so yes. Rich is defined by tax brackets. Maritial status is already something that has a paper trail. There is no room for abuse because everything is already clearly defined by the law.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 11:38 PM
1

Homophobia. How classy of you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 11:25 PM
1

Ad hominan. Thank you for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 11:19 PM
0

I feel like it would be pretty obvious if a person is rich or not if you supeona their bank records
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 10:27 PM
1

First amendment applies to opinions not intentional lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 10:26 PM
1

Anyone can get in shape but not everyone has the apptitude for art.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 10:16 PM
1

The term alpha and beta aren’t even accurate tbh. There isn’t a dichotomy of human characteristics. The existence of incels who are neither “providers” or “chads” proves this. The whole concept is honestly absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 10:12 PM
7

Depends on how attractive you are. In a smaller dating pool unattractive people have a better chance because people of the opposite gender are more likely to be desperate. For attractive people it obviously doesn’t matter either way
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 10:09 PM
0

Can’t help but notice you didn’t answer their question but did go out of your way to insult them. I’m just going to assume they are right since you clearly are dishonest
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 10:06 PM
2

Free speech is about expression of an opinion. A factually untrue statement would not be covered by it. Hence why slander can be a crime
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 10:04 PM
2

If they are in jail they can’t engage in that behavior so your point is moot
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 09:59 PM
2

I got involuntarily committed a few months ago for being suicidal and men and women that know of my situation have been very supportive of me. What you are saying simply isn’t true. Edit: I’m a guy btw
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 02:00 AM
75

There...is. Look up deadbeat dads
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 04:38 PM
1

The Uk is also fairly authoritarian and are all too happy to use the legal system to punish people for stepping out of line, even if it would only make the problem worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 04:52 PM
1

....I’m a demon, the idea is to not take anyone alive
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 04:48 AM
1

Ah, you are a clever little mortal. I am Beezelbub, Demon Prince of the 9th layer of the Abyss. You conservatives may have uncovered our insidious trap, but you are too late! Even now, hundreds of demon kind have infested your insiginficant little planet at all levels of government. Soon, your little dirt rock will belong to the true masters of the universe! Resistance is futile! Submit to possession and let the torment of your pitiful single minded existence be ended and join our glorious colle…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 12:54 AM
1

You...could just stop responding
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 12:35 AM
1

You...did read the flair didn't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:50 PM
1

Am I to assume you don't have a more reliable source?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:37 PM
1

Your source only covers aggression. Sources for other claims plz.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:37 PM
1

I find that very hard to believe. Sources plz
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:12 PM
1

I am not allowed to attempt to convince you, so the mere absence of evidence is the best I am allowed to present.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:19 PM
1

K.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:16 PM
1

No, only 5 percent of stay at home moms. Most parents both work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:16 PM
1

I’m not allowed to provide links according to the rules on the subreddit for a cmv.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:15 PM
1

K. How does that prove it is based on biology instead of outdated cultural norms?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:10 PM
1

Ok. Insecure men are insecure. What’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:09 PM
1

Source plz
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:08 PM
1

Injections could provide those same anti-bodies
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:07 PM
1

I am. And as you can see from the responses some people do believe that. I remain unconvinced
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:06 PM
1

Can’t help but notice you haven’t provided source. Any reason why?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:05 PM
1

Your first source literally is called “marketwatch.com” and has a clickbait title. Doesn’t seem reliable. Like. At all. Second one is related to cheating which is outside the scope of this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:04 PM
1

Spoken like someone who knows they are wrong but don’t want to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:03 PM
1

...source plz
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:02 PM
1

Good for you. What’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:02 PM
1

Can’t. CMV thread requires you to be the one to provide sources
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:01 PM
1

That could be a case of correlation does not mean causation with cultural norms discouraging career women from having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:00 PM
1

Where did you get your degree in evolutionary genetics?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:59 PM
1

Got a more reliable source then “divorce saloon.” The name alone makes me question its reliability
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:59 PM
1

Ok. And then point of your anecdotal evidence is...?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:58 PM
1

I do
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:57 PM
1

Something tells me you haven’t taken evolutionary bio 101
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:56 PM
1

I did not. I said it could be a minority. I’m gonna need a source to prove I am wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:55 PM
1

Coincidence, falsely thinking correlation means causation, and general resistance to change
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:50 PM
1

You think I’ve been using “big words”? Lol indeed. I sincerely hope you are in middle because it would be really sad if you are older
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 02:56 PM
1

I do have more. And if I was given more then unsubstantiated assumptions I would provide them. Sadly the vocabulary of those that are responding to this seems to be fairly limited.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 09:12 PM
1

That is due to cultural norms, not biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 09:11 PM
1

Spoken like someone who knows they are wrong but are not willing to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 09:10 PM
1

Truth. Formula is a possibility. And injections can provide these same antibodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 09:09 PM
1

There are women in this very thread that say the opposite. Do you have a source indicating they are an outlier?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 09:08 PM
2

The UK disregarding fairness or justice doesn’t prove anything. That’s been their MO for the past 200+ years
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 08:44 PM
1

Sources please.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:23 PM
1

Just because it doesn’t work for you doesn’t mean it can’t work for someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:21 PM
1

Ad hominan. Did I offend you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:20 PM
-1

Go to any impoverished area, you’ll find that men are perfectly capable to getting women. Actually lower income people seem to be better at it then higher income people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:15 PM
2

That’s a hasty generalization
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:09 PM
0

Some women may, some women may not. It depends on the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:09 PM
1

Awfully cynical of you to think all women have a uniform mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:08 PM
1

The same could be said of a stay at home mom. There are literally women in this thread saying they like the idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 03:08 PM
0

Ok, a women is more likely to prefer a high status man on average, but that isn’t universally true. Still doesn’t mean I am wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:37 PM
2

No, this is a cmv thread. I am asking you to change my view. My absence of knowledge does not mean the opposite is true, and to say otherwise would be a “appeal to ignorance” fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:36 PM
0

Ok I am convinced women prefer high status men. What makes you think men don’t feel the same way?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:34 PM
2

Don’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:33 PM
1

Source plz
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:33 PM
1

Source plz
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:31 PM
2

Depends on what job the women has. But yea, I agree that both parents may need to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:29 PM
1

I am not. You are just not very persuasive. Someone else convinced me that both parents should work unless the mother or father has a high paying position.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:27 PM
1

Okay women do give birth. That means afterwords they can return to work and the fathers can raise the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:26 PM
1

Yes it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:26 PM
1

Thank you. That can be one factor in why a women should stay with their infant. It still isn’t dispositive though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:25 PM
2

That that is their sole purpose, yes. By that logic the only purpose of a male is to be a speed donor.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:24 PM
1

They did not. They provided a short paragraphs saying they recommend breastfeeding feeding then listed related articles. I didn’t look at the related articles but if one is relevant, plz link
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:23 PM
1

I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:22 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:21 PM
1

Fair enough, I’ll concede that both parents may need to work if the women doesn’t have a suitably high paying job.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:21 PM
1

I was told that you need to CMV, and I am explicitly not allowed to attempt to change yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:21 PM
1

Your source talks about the benefits of breastfeeding, it doesn’t offer a comparison to formula.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:19 PM
1

Right back at you. Posting a working link isn’t hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:18 PM
1

I am serious. Source plz
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:18 PM
2

Did you not read the flair?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:18 PM
1

You...do realize debate is in the name of the subreddit right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:17 PM
3

....yes, They can fulfill the same role.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:17 PM
1

So....you agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:17 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:16 PM
1

Working source link plz
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:16 PM
0

Source plz.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:16 PM
4

I was raised by a stay at home dad and my parents are still married.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:15 PM
5

Please provide a link to specific portions of history or specific sources from biologist. I am not inclined to take your word for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:15 PM
2

Psychologist are not biologist
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:13 PM
0

First link did not work Second link provided benefits without comparing to formula (unless I missed the comparison)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:13 PM
3

I was raised by a stay at home dad while my mom worked full time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:10 PM
3

A father could make the same sacrifice during a child’s infancy while the mom works
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:10 PM
0

Reliable source on the mother being needed early in life instead of father plz
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:09 PM
1

I think it depends on an individual couple’s situation. If what you suggest would make the most sense for them then sure, but I don’t that that HAS to be what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:07 PM
0

Webmd being unreliable is literally a meme. Please see: https://www.thethings.com/15-memes-about-webmd-that-will-actually-make-you-lol/ Reliable source plz
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 11:01 PM
2

Maintenance =/= nurture.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:59 PM
1

Gonna need a source on that. I see no reason a women would require any significant amount of time to return to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:58 PM
2

That isn’t inherently true. There are women in this thread that said they would prefer the provider role.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:57 PM
4

Depends on the aptitude of the parents. If a mother is highly skilled at a high paying job, it may be best for her to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:56 PM
3

Children require nurture from the day they are born.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:55 PM
2

Source plz
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:54 PM
1

Do you have a degree in genetics? Otherwise I’m going to need a source on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:53 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:53 PM
0

There were literally women in this thread that have said they would like a SAHD husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:52 PM
2

You don’t consider caring for a child productive?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:51 PM
1

...what?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:50 PM
-1

Outliers demonstrate that there is not an inherent reason for a phenomena existing. In the absence of a phenomena being inherent, there must be some other reason for why it exist. Cultural norms would explain the existence of this trend, and there is no reason for the trend to exist. This isn’t to say that women can’t be stay at home mothers, only that there is no particular reason why they MUST be stay at home instead of the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:49 PM
1

Source on most women preferring this please. The disadvantages do not necessarily outweigh all advantages. They certainly can, but they don’t have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:47 PM
3

Sure, but the benefits of breast milk are not so great tbey would outweigh all other considerations.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:45 PM
6

There are very ambitious women that would only feel fulfilled if they have a successful career. There are a number of women that have not had kids specifically because they thought it would cost them their career. There are also unambitois men that have no interest in a career and would be delighted to stay at home to raise a kid. Currently both of these groups are discouraged by modern culture, and if that discouragement was abondoned both groups could have a fulfilling life while still having …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:44 PM
6

Sure, but that doesn’t mean that outweighs the benefit of the father being a stay at home dad in and of itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:28 PM
2

Baby Formula.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:20 PM
7

I assume that isn’t what they mean when they say fat. They likely mean obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 03:10 AM
1

Jury nullification is a thing. If I was a juror I’d just say “nope I think it could have been his evil twin. Sorry, but beyond a reasonable doubt and all that.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 02:49 AM
1

You are very ignorant of history then. Chiba has broken up and reformed throughout the centuries, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it happens again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 08:17 PM
1

China’s social situation is very tenuous. There is a lot of civil unrest that is hiding under the surface. Honestly wouldn’t be surprised if they have a civil war within the next 20 or so years.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 08:01 PM
1

You.....do realize that Hispanic are white don’t you? Like do you know where Spain is located?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 08:00 PM
1

My point is that women are lustful as well, I just used teenage girls as an example because of how overt many of them are about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 03:39 PM
1

Because some women have ambition. They want to be successful because it would make them more fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 02:13 PM
1

I prefer it to porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 02:11 PM
2

Have you never met a teenage girl before? They are horny af
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 02:05 PM
2

What the hell. That’s messed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 02:05 PM
2

42 percent masculine 61 percent feminine I’m a guy lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 02:01 PM
5

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 06:49 AM
0

They are taking advantage of people that are clearly mentally ill. Not everyone is ok with exploiting the disabled.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 12:12 AM
2

You clearly don’t live near a large homeless population.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 01:32 PM
3

So can men. You don’t seem realize how many desperate women there are out there. Now, sleeping with someone you actually find attractive, that’s the hard part.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/19 02:27 PM
2

How many wives of rich men do you know? They don’t seem to be any more arrogant or entitled then anyone other demographic in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 11:56 PM
3

Yes. I literally want to be a stay at home dad. Unfortunately I am neither particularly good at cooking or cleaning
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 07:21 PM
4

Many young women are not having sex either. It just isn’t talked about as much because of the stigma with women having sex. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/573949/ Notice how it says millennials instead of millennial men
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:46 AM
1

Women are not attracted to bullies, they are attracted to the traits that enable them to be bullies. Being a bully just demonstrates they possess those traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 03:18 PM
0

Ah yes, saying that I am incapable of knowing, but not saying how I’m wrong. A favorite place tactic of those that know they are wrong but don’t want to admit it. Anyway I don’t want to wait for the timer to respond anymore so I’m out. Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 08:12 PM
0

No they don’t. Lions don’t (it’s actually the inverse), wolves don’t, bears dont, etc. and if it’s a 20 percent loss it doesn’t matter which gender it is, the population will survive either way. The population will be smaller do its women, but that would be an advantage in pre-agriculture societies since food was incredibly scarce. Also: having to wait 5 minutes to post has gotten too annoying so I’m out. Cheers
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 08:02 PM
1

That danger only came about after human populations became large enough that they could easily deal with larger predators using numbers alone. Which they wouldn’t have been able to do without women and their ability to see which foods are safe because they would have all starved if they had to rely on meat alone. And once again, if those old tribes had access to firearms, women would have been the warriors since they make better riflemen. Also: if you have enough of one gender to support a popul…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 07:51 PM
1

They are not. The effects of inbreeding would wipe out a population within a generation or two. They’d last roughly as long as a population with too few women. Potentially less long actually since they would have to devote more resources to caring for disabled people that will never be able to provide for themselves, and since men never stop producing sperm, as long as they still live they can maintain genetic diversity for a longer period of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 07:40 PM
1

Men are not reproductively worthless due to the effects of inbreeding. Humans are by and large one of the weaker of the top predators. Humans didn’t survive by beating grizzlies in a fight, they did it by avoiding them. Since woman are smaller they would actually be better suited for this since they can easily fit in hiding spots. So no, men did not have to protect “their” women. Small number of either equals extinction either way. The birth defects from incest would wipe out a population within…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 07:28 PM
1

Men are not more expendable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 07:18 PM
1

Counterpoint: men impregnate women. That’s literally it. They had to evolve into hunters so they could pretend to be useful for anything other then being a sperm doner. The protection thing exist due to socialeta conditioning that came about from militaristic societies back when being able to swing a sword was the end all be all, and the inherent difficulty in changing cultural perceptions cause us to continue doing this even though women would make better riflemen. And if you only have a small …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 07:08 PM
1

As I said, there were millions of factors that could of led to this, and its impossible to know which are the correct ones. I can speculate though. For example: we know that most of prehistoric humans diet was fruits and edible plants. Since men are ill suited for gathering plants due to their eyesight (whcuh would make them signicantly more likely to take plants that are poisonous to humans) they could have evolved to be larger because the advantage in strength happened to outweigh the weakness…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 06:16 PM
0

No I did not, you just don’t like my answer. giving you an answer you don’t like isn’t the same as dodging the question. As I said, it is due to random mutations that were coincidently advantageous due to some set of factors. I’m not going to claim to know what series mutations or what set of the millions of factors led to this result, I just know that they were present. Giving an answer you don’t like is not the same thing as dodging the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 06:05 PM
1

Yes, but the existence of the external factors that natural selection operates on are coincidental, which means natural selection itself is coincided by extension. And this means evolution, as I said before, is purely a coincidence. Neanderthals literally died out because they were larger (as in stocky, not height, which still made them stronger) because their larger bodies required more energy which led to their extinction when food was more scarce. I literally can’t believe I had to spell this…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 05:53 PM
1

All of evolution is a coincidence, as is the very existence of biological life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 05:31 PM
1

No it’s because men are physically larger, which equates to know muscle mass and thus more strength. Hence why larger animals are stronger then smaller ones. For someone that tries to talk about evolution you know very little about basic biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 05:17 PM
1

The reason for that is because men are physically stronger on average then women, which enabled them to subsumed matriarchal societies. The advent of the firearm made individual physical strength irrelevant, hence why knights and samurai died out, and women would actually make better riflemen then men due to their smaller size and ability to better distinguish color (which would make them better at seeing camouflage). However, since these patrichial societies became predominant before the invent…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 04:53 PM
1

If that were true then how did matriarchal societies come to exist in the first place? Shouldn’t that be impossible?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 04:32 PM
1

I think it’s because the US culture traditionally emphasizes the importance of individualism, and the traditional feminine role they would be thrusted into was contrary to these values, which led to a much stronger push back.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 06:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter