TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZeroBugBounce Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by ZeroBugBounce on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

To me, the equivalence of the death penalty to a killing such as this is completely dependant on how objectively common it is that the crime for which the killing is ostensibly done, was provably committed by the person killed. Basically, are those who kill in accident or even on purpose in stopping a heinous crime more 'accurate' than a court who sentences someone to die. I sort of expect they are, but I would like to know if there are any data to best on the subject.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:08 PM
3

Thanks!
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:53 PM
3

I don't doubt you one bit, but could you tell me the primary source of that number?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:40 PM
4

It's an issue that disadvantages men in an unfair way, so yes, it's a men's rights issue. While I fully support encouraging more women to enter male-dominated industries (I am an egalitarian about gender issues), I think this kind of policy is very blunt and on its face very unfair to hard-working individuals. In particular, the petroleum industry is the richest industry in the world - if they want to encourage more women to enter their various related fields, they could easily expand their inte…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:09 AM
2

Glad it means something to someone! I'm pretty passionate about approaching these issues with curiosity and fairness. I think those of us who are concerned with these issues, but who are no longer easily set off by them, should talk as much and as publicly as we can.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:20 AM
2

Well, that's cool. I think our problems will be eased by cool, rational and at the same time more personal discussions about the issues.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:52 PM
3

patriarchy and privilege because it's harmful to both men and women I think that's true, but I've seen too many scenarios where a commentator seems to have started with the conclusion ("patriarchy and privilege are to blame!") and worked backwards from there. They are a little too woolly and general for me to be happy using them as terms. Why not focus on the particular details of every case and if we diagnose prejudice based on gender in a particular scenario, call it out?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:45 PM
6

I wish that there could be some rigorous, widely accepted definition of feminism that persisted over time and that never included any denigration or men (cis or trans). I really wish your definition was the one, true definition accepted by everyone who called themselves feminists - I really do. It's simply not the case, though, that everyone who calls themselves feminist adheres to this kind of definition. I feel strongly that these broad terms (feminism, men's rights, patriarchy, privilege etc.…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:00 PM
4

The writer is correct when he talks about the separation of the two ideas of 1. blame and 2. the empirical question of what makes rape more or less likely and how this separation is often ignored when it comes to talking about rape. I prefer being more technical and dispassionate about it than he is, though, because we are in fact completely on women's side on this issue and it pains me to see such a disconnect. Here's how I divide up the two ideas: First is the idea that a woman can deserve to …
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:53 AM
3

Okay, so under what circumstances should someone be forced to have an abortion?
/r/MensRights02/12/10 12:42 AM
24

So, do we at least all agree that: No-one should be forced to have an abortion. No-one who's been raped should be forced to pay child support for a baby that is the result of that rape?
/r/MensRights01/12/10 06:00 AM
3

I'd love to see more if you would be so kind as to post them.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 02:04 AM
1

Like kloo said, an impossible statement to make with any truth value (true or false, more or less likely etc.) whatsoever. I will say two things I think we could prove if we tried: 1) Never in history has there been a better set of laws in the US/Canada/Europe regarding women's rights than now. 2) (the down side) Women face more psychologically and otherwise complex and pervasive problems than they ever have.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 10:44 PM
1

Agree with the others, good points! Women lose on objectification Heterosexual men lose on objectification, too - in that they would like to be objectified but aren't :)
/r/MensRights25/07/10 10:37 PM
7

Yeah, I see your point - of course it's a continuum from sober to 'heavily under the influence' so what to do? [Filed under "everything is so damn complicated".]
/r/MensRights22/07/10 07:07 AM
13

Right.. I'd also say that even directed attraction and arousal fall short of consent. The problem with people's perception is that men consent to sex far more than they actually have it. Thus, few believe a man wouldn't consent post hoc.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:02 AM
4

I think your position may be more reasonable than that statement makes it sound. Saying you'd "never believe a woman (or man)" isn't true if you are taking the skeptical position - you could believe them, after they provided sufficient evidence.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 05:53 AM
4

You raise an important point... but I doubt anyone who considers themselves raped will entertain the hypothesis that 'maybe I consented as much as I could given my alcohol-incapacitated state'.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 05:49 AM
2

I'll also point towards a 2003 GAO report that tries to make an explanatory model of the differences: GAO Report I have no expertise to vet this model, but it sounds plausible, at least.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 04:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter