TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zeroooood Archive

View 2 posts and 69 comments by Zeroooood on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

Marriage/ChildrenZeroooood/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:20 PM
16

Marriage/ChildrenZeroooood/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:43 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Don't get me wrong, the whole 'Russia is to blame" is obvious nonsense. But this post is..shit.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:51 PM
7

CAFE is perhaps the most important mens' orgs in NA. But don't expect Donald Trump or other such clowns to help.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:58 PM
1

Also, I'd like to point out that this video has only a few thousand views, much, much less than your average Oprah Winf vid.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:45 PM
6

Yes.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:37 PM
1

No. Poor Asians don’t have this problem. Even in China? And Thailand? You're so dumb this is like shooting fish in a barrel. lol.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:09 PM
1

For fathers?
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:43 PM
1

:) Cheers.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:34 PM
1

An author CLAIMS a Nixon advisor said that. Um, that's what I said, dumbass. You have a remarkable ability to not read.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:17 PM
1

You have to work for high paying jobs in capitalism and I fail to see what’s wrong with that. If what you said was correct, all of Africa would be a billionaire paradise. In fact, there is almost no correlation between wealth and hard work in a capitalist society. If anything, the situation is reversed: the more you work, the less you earn. ;)
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:08 PM
1

And you lose. Better luck next time ;)
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:45 PM
2

Still a load of SJW bullshit conspiracy. You should look up that term, sonny. Here's a hint: your leaders are not Pollyanish little douche bags, they typically have brains. And that especially applies to the people who actually run the show in CIA and at the Pentagon.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:29 PM
1

Easy solution: high paying jobs and the restoration of father's rights. Capitalists won't allow the former and feminists won't allow the latter. Edit: this post has minus one vote. Imagine the horror of someone who would downvote the idea of healthy families and healthy wages. Here we have your feminists and right wing fruit cakes like /u/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:18 PM
4

There is no "secret conspiracy," it's completely out in the open. Nixon's right hand man admitted it. The war against blacks is also a war against poor whites. Remember that. It means that clowns like Jesse Jackson and that fat guy whose name I forget will work against their own people in favor of sweet cash. Just like white people. Equality. Bitch.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:11 PM
0

I'm a libertarian socialist. Capitalism (like communism) doesn't work. Socialism can work, but only if there is a fierce commitment to individual rights and opposition to centralized power. The less inequality the happier people are. There is no reason why socialism can't coincide with individual liberty. Quite the opposite. "Gary Nash describes Iroquois culture. No laws and ordinances, sheriffs and constables, judges and juries, or courts or jails - the apparatus of authority in European societ…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:25 PM
3

Yep.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:21 PM
2

Are you aware that the US has more prisoners than China? (land of the free?) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/07/07/yes-u-s-locks-people-up-at-a-higher-rate-than-any-other-country/ Are you aware that a study in Britain determined that if men were treated like women in the criminal "justice" system, five out of six male prisoners would be free? Are you aware that men are imprisoned if they can't find job and fail to pay child support? I don't know what the answer is. What …
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:19 PM
12

You're thinking of crack. Coke was mostly a white man's drug (we're talking about the 70's to 90's, correct?). There were even different punishments depending on how the Coca leaf was refined. I'll tell you what: you grow up in a "family" without a father, your only male role model is the local gang leader, you have no realistic prospect of getting a decent job, the jobs themselves are being shipped to Mexico, and you might resort to drugs too. The "war on drugs" has been proven a monumental fai…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:03 PM
1

I agree with you. What I'm saying is -- if elites got rid of the social safety net there would be a revolution within a month. Hunger is a very, very powerful motivator -- especially when other people are driving around in Ferraris. Elites aren't stupid, as much as they may seem to be. They figured this stuff out a long time ago. There would be no need for welfare if there were well paying jobs and if feminism ceased to exist. Right wingers focus on the latter but the former is just as important…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 05:44 PM
6

There's no point in eliminating social safety nets unless jobs are available that pay decent wages. That is the conclusion that capitalists came to during the great depression. It certainly wasn't out of benevolence: they recognized that if we allowed people to starve in Western nations while others lived like kings there was a legitimate threat of revolution. Sociologists even have a term for it: "social dynamite." The welfare state was not created by bleeding heart liberals. It was created by …
/r/MensRights25/11/17 05:24 PM
10

I love the new feminist term "sexual misconduct." Not assault. Not harassment. "Misconduct." I have no idea what this professor did or didn't do, just find the term disturbing.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:36 PM
6

Seriously. I thought feminists needed men like a fish needs a bicycle? What are we your chaperones? Fuck off legbeards.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:35 PM
5

Lol why is this inane feminist propaganda being upvoted? Lurkers much?
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:33 PM
16

Nixon advisor: We created the war on drugs to “criminalize” black people and the anti-war left https://qz.com/645990/nixon-advisor-we-created-the-war-on-drugs-to-criminalize-black-people-and-the-anti-war-left/ The left will point to the above. The right will point to the feminist war against fathers. Both groups are correct.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:31 PM
7

Nixon advisor: We created the war on drugs to “criminalize” black people and the anti-war left https://qz.com/645990/nixon-advisor-we-created-the-war-on-drugs-to-criminalize-black-people-and-the-anti-war-left/ So there was a combination of feminism (eliminate fathers) plus a desire to imprison/control the black underclass.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:27 PM
5

You're painting with a broad brush. About half the posters here are right wing; the other half? We recognize the importance of fathers and we also recognize the injustice of the prison industrial complex.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:24 PM
5

They're not mutually exclusive. Hence the concept of "mens rights". Denzel has millions to spare. Most men don't. Loved him in Malcolm X though.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:37 PM
1

I didn’t even dignify the rest of your comment by reading it yet I can still see even more of your lies lol You sound like a feminist -- "I'm too snotty to read what you wrote, I shall run away." I'm trying to be generous here. "Free exchange of goods" is not the same thing as capitalism. Capitalism entails the yoke of wage slavery. If you are correct -- if all of civilized history including all trade = capitalism, we wouldn't have had to come up with a new word. Same with property. Indigenous p…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 09:03 AM
1

I understand.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:05 AM
0

It depends how you define "right wing." Some figures on the far, far right oppose (or claim to oppose) your numbers 1 though 4. But like SJW's and feminists they are mostly just useful idiots -- their arguments are used for their utility when convenient, then tossed aside. Immigration is a perfect example, since throughout American history new immigrant groups have been scapegoated during times of economic downturn. The Border Control was created in 1924 -- not to deport illegal immigrants but t…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:04 AM
0

No, I'm not making that up, I think some prominent feminist was involved with the CIA somehow ( I forgot which one It wasn't just one. The Ford, Rockefeller, and other huge capitalist foundations were used extensively by the CIA throughout the Cold War. This is NOT controversial among historians on either the right or left. Hell, even the AFL-CIO labor union was used by the CIA. Guess who funded second wave feminism and created the first gender studies class? These aren't "theories." These are f…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:45 AM
1

Hey, we agree on something :)
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:34 AM
2

Do you think they'd all want to get married if marriage wasn't a state-run bigoted ladies' first shit show? I do. Women seem to like the status of having a husband, at least for awhile, and there would still be additional security for the woman even if the laws were fair. More importantly, why do you care if women want to get married or not? I don't, really. Just pointing out they're shooting themselves in the foot by opposing alimony reform and equal custody. I do care insofar as it is recogniz…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:28 AM
2

Capitalism started LONG before there were factories, LOL Ummm...I just finished saying that. "A host of oftentimes brutal laws designed to undermine whatever resistance people maintained against the demands of wage labor accompanied the dispossession of the peasants' rights, even before capitalism had become a significant economic force." And your use the word "long" is flatly incorrect. The term capitalism was coined by Karl Marx. None of this is controversial. I have far more respect for capit…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:23 AM
36

Great post. Men and women have always shared power, but they have typically done so in a complementary rather than competitive fashion. "Patriarchy" has never existed in the way feminists (and tradcons) believe. Here's a study on peasant life titled Female Forms of Power And The Myth of Male Dominance: A Model of Female/Male Interaction in Peasant Society. And here's an anarchist study of the Iroquois Confederacy, in which both men and women wielded power in their separate councils according to …
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:07 AM
2

Don't polls show that most women still want to get married?
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:32 AM
2

You conflate capitalism with forcing peasants into factories That's literally how capitalism developed. Look up the enclosure acts. "Primitive accumulation cut through traditional lifeways like scissors. The first blade served to undermine the ability of people to provide for themselves. The other blade was a system of stern measures required to keep people from finding alternative survival strategies outside the system of wage labor. A host of oftentimes brutal laws designed to undermine whatev…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:01 AM
-3

You're too dumb for me to continue this conversation. Bye.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:29 AM
2

Yes, because of the expansion of government power and growth of the size of government. Nope. You're thinking of the progressive era, in which the government created new regulatory powers in an attempt to prevent corporations from completely running the government (which is known as inverted totalitarianism). The late 19th century was extremely laissez faire. Inequality is not an issue, you want to make as much as Steve Jobs? Unfortunately I don't have access to a hundred thousand Chinese slaves…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:20 AM
4

True. But pretty sad it's come to this.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:03 AM
4

you could try r/menslib or r/askfeminsits. but both are pretty banhappy from what i've heard.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:38 AM
10

Yes, this one. Other gender focusses subs are all feminist.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:27 AM
5

This is why socialist countries like Venezuela have very rich politicians and very poor citizens. The same is true of all third world countries. When the right wing Argentinian government completely deregulated businesses about a decade ago the whole economy collapsed. If you live in the third world you're gonna have a bad time. Corporations and banks only run America thanks to big government and corrupt politicians. I reckon that non-corrupt politicians account for maybe 0.1 percent of the worl…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:26 AM
26

That sub is full of legbeards from r/AgainstMensRights
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:10 AM
3

Lol corporations and banks run America, not "communists."
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:44 PM
1

Well, someone has to file a complaint first. Has anyone in Canada tried to do so? Maybe it could even be made anonymously?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:14 PM
10

What exactly did the paper say about women? The article doesn't specify. All they mentioned is some sort of anti-Jewish comic. I don't support hate speech laws, but perhaps it's time that people living in countries that have them start bringing up charges against feminists. They are by far the biggest hate mongers out there and they publish their drivel in mainstream publications with complete impunity.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:54 PM
5

Only one answer needed for this legbeard: fuck off.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 07:47 PM
7

Yes. That's presumably why they're being funded by the world's wealthiest men. It's been going on since the 70's with the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. Feminists and SJW's are useful idiots. This is typical of crony capitalism rather than libertarian capitalism. All capitalist systems become monopolistic as wealth accrues to particular individuals/corporations. This was recognized by the anarchist Peter Kropotkin hundreds of years ago. Edit: someone just posted this on Kia. It seems apt: Tha…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 07:41 PM
17

Who is this legbeard? Anyone notable?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 07:38 PM
3

/R/Cringe
/r/MensRights24/11/17 06:50 PM
20

Now this, ladies and gentlemen, is what "sexual entitlement" looks like. Well this and about 80 percent of female dating profiles and "love" songs. Especially funny considering that so many women are terrible in bed. Starfish anyone? And I also love that about half of the demands are contradictory!! Perhaps we she could call this the Goldilox syndrome: everything is either a little too hot or a little too cold, and nothing but (unattainable) perfection will suffice. Newsflash ladies: we're not c…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 07:20 AM
2

It's barbaric. Women and girls should be allowed to free bleed, pee on the street, yell at the moon, vomit on people when they feel like it, and generally devolve into an animalistic, feral state. These demands to "bathe" and be "polite" and "not act like a lunatic" come straight from the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 06:01 AM
3

So according to feminists, the ideal solution to prostitution is the Nordic/Canadian model (hatched by an unholy alliance between right-wingers and feminists). In this bizarre scenario, only the buyer should be arrested. Nevermind that sex workers themselves want it legalized. Shall we expect feminists to demand that these horny old broads and "career women" be sent to the clink? Feminists? Is this thing on? Hello? You know what would be hilarious? If the MGTOW phenomenon expands to the point wh…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 04:48 AM
7

An alarming number of feminists seem to have the mental age of twelve years girls. I say that with some reluctance, since my 12-year-old niece is the height of maturity in comparison. The Guardian has become a laughingstock.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 04:42 AM
-27

You unnecessarily use the word "female", you speak about women like feminists speak about men, and your username is literally Incelbydate. I did the math. I have nothing against incels, incidentally (why would I?), only those who constantly whine about it. Higher a hooker then move on to more important things.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 03:18 AM
-37

I guess this sub was right to worried about the influx of incels.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 03:07 AM
1

Again, learn to take a joke.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:41 AM
1

Still a pussy response.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:29 AM
1

Have you seen the woman in question?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:27 AM
7

men have harder lives than women Of course they do. It's not even close. Those are just averages though. Some men have it swell. Rich men for example.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 01:56 AM
59

Every country except China. There was just an article about this on AVFM actually. "In China females die by suicide at a rate of 3 to 1, concentrated in the rural areas. Women in rural China are the glue and workhorse of the family unit, expected to maintain care and keep the peace in households that are often multigenerational. The culture of China pressurizes this position. For example, when women are hospitalized due to mental illness, the average length of stay is more than 28 days, whereas …
/r/MensRights24/11/17 01:53 AM
14

It was a joke, and a funny one at that. He's not entirely wrong though. Women make up half the population, so it would be rather astonishing if they played no role in male suicide.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 01:50 AM
308

This is what "institutional oppression" actually looks like. But don't worry gents, as soon as feminists solve more pressing problems like the tampon tax and manspreading, they'll be right on it.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 01:38 AM
5

It formerly had the highest standard of living in Africa and a prison population lower than Norway. Not saying it was some sort of paradise, but I'm pretty sure we didn't destroy that country for humanitarian reasons. As for Syria, here's what the "Queen of Chaos" said about that matter: "Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to dev…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 01:14 AM
11

Wasn't there an article posted here recently stating that fathers can also suffer the equivalent of postpartum depression? Somehow I don't think we'd have a lot of empathy for a father who threw his baby in a dumpster. Remember folks: when feminists say "women and children" they're only talking about the first part.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 12:38 AM
34

Yes, but women attempt it more often. No they don't. Taking a few pills and calling 911 is not a suicide attempt. Indeed I seem to recall that the "study" on which this myth was based included things like "self-harm." So it could have included an edgy teenage girl cutting her hand.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:33 PM
5

Another female chauvinist cow and hypocrite.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:23 PM
31

It's a fucking disgrace that we have to rely on the Daily Mail to publicize these findings. Where are the blazing headlines in the feminist corporate media? Where is the BBC? And before someone says, "you can't trust anything in the Daily Mail," note that it's simply quoting the new Office of National Statistics (ONS) report.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:20 PM
23

Feminism is in many ways an extreme manifestation of the traditional female gender role: women are helpless damsels in distress who lack agency. Bob Black commented upon this in one of his essays on feminism, noting that it reduced women to nothing but "cringing near vegetables" and "objects of male coercion." Empowering? I think not. Feminism = toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter