| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Man who tricked girlfriend into taking abortion pill sentenced to nearly 14 years in prisonHonestly if you look at the minimums for 2nd degree murder it seems to be right in line. However one could say this is closer to 1st degree murder since the life was terminated and had prior planning. However then again a fetus is a potential life and not a life so you can't necessarily classify it as murder otherwise any abortion would be murder. This makes the case much more difficult to sentence, but I think the judge handed down a fair sentence. If you think it's unfair explain why I'm inter… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/14 09:37 PM |
| 3 | Man who tricked girlfriend into taking abortion pill sentenced to nearly 14 years in prisonI think the guy got a fair sentence... | /r/MensRights | 28/01/14 08:48 PM |
| 1 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"Super constructive, strange how I'm the only one being civil and I'm a fucking idiot... | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 06:43 PM |
| 2 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"This is a pretty pointless discussion... | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 06:33 PM |
| 0 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"Well I haven't actually read any statistics that indicate this personally, but common sense would dictate it's true. As I stated previously I don't think a sex should be used in this circumstance, but it wouldn't be false to do so. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 06:30 PM |
| 0 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"Again like I said you can't go off of numbers that are not published. You have to go off the actual numbers and understand that they can be false and data can be over or under represented. However what you can't do is say that women are doing the majority of rape without data because you're making the exact same error you're pointing out in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 06:15 PM |
| 1 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"I think this is a pretty far definition. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rapist | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 06:02 PM |
| 2 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"I agree, look at my other post. Language is a tricky thing and it defiantly colors our interpretation of the world. I would say the definition is sexist as it stands and it should have a asexual pronoun. I'm just arguing people are pointing out that the men don't rape at a higher rate which is false. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 06:00 PM |
| 0 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"I can see your point, and frankly I think that asexual pronouns should be used at all times unless only one sex can fit the definition. However if someone were to say this in conversation it wouldn't be wrong. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 05:54 PM |
| -3 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"Incarceration rates by race 2013-google. Not sure if you want to deny it. It's not saying all people of a certain race commit crimes. It's saying people of a certain race or gender commit crimes at higher rates. Again this can be misrepresented because of under reporting or racism, but does that mean these studies should not be done? Are we supposed to stick our head in the sand and pretend the information isn't there? We just have to be careful about how we interpret the data and how it changes… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 05:52 PM |
| 2 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"It's not talking about the victim though it's talking about the rapist. I'm not trying to be a dick, but are we really going to ignore the fact. A man can rape a man so I'm not sure where you're going with that line of thought. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 05:46 PM |
| 2 | Oxford dictionary still defines rapist as "typically a man"Rape is typically done by a male though. Typically means a majority not all. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/14 05:17 PM |
| 1 | Should nudism be a men's rights cause? (testicular health and comfort)Just so you know men can wear low cut shirts. They are called v-necks. You're grasping at straws here. There is no right to be naked in public. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/13 02:10 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter