~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Bad argument I found on twitter that I wanted to share because it pissed me offI absolutely agree. Like racism, misogyny and misandry are irrational, unfair and cruel because they demonise people on the basis of an unchosen and immutable attribute and it is meaningless and pointless to ask which is worse.There is nothing any individual woman could say or do that would make me hate all women. There are good men, bad men, good women and bad women. The assertion that violence is worse than misandry (and misogyny) without violence is true but irrelevant in this context because… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/07/25 01:47 AM |
| 3 | Got into a quarrel with a feminist about dangers of generalisation.I don't align myself with radical feminists/ misandrists. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 08:55 PM |
| 4 | Got into a quarrel with a feminist about dangers of generalisation.I also think that many women assume that if they walk alone at night a large proportion, if not all, men are going to be tempted to rape them. Maybe I'm lucky to be living in a particularly safe area, but I frequently go on walks in the evening including after it becomes dark and I see other men and women walking, sometimes in groups and sometimes alone. And in the 19 months I've lived here I have not heard of a single report of rape or assault. Yes there are rapists out there and they're scum, … | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 07:02 PM |
| 8 | Got into a quarrel with a feminist about dangers of generalisation.There is a difference between a woman assuming that every man she passes on the street intends to assault her, and a woman erring on the side of caution because she has no way of knowing whether or not a given man intends to assault her. The former is absurd and offensive; the latter is perfectly understandable. To use an analogy, one locks one's doors, not because one believes that someone would enter one’s house illegally if the doors were not locked, but because one has no way of knowing whet… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 04:32 PM |
| 8 | Got into a quarrel with a feminist about dangers of generalisation.Yes I think it's best to just ignore the radical feminists aka misandrists. Having said that, there are many women who identify as feminists who are genuinely after fairness and equality with men, so it would be wrong to dismiss every woman who calls herself a feminist. But yes I agree there's no reasoning with the minority of women who are hateful misandrists. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 03:34 PM |
| 5 | Got into a quarrel with a feminist about dangers of generalisation.I agree. Just because they hate us (for being men) doesn't mean we have to stoop to their level. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 01:58 PM |
| 8 | Got into a quarrel with a feminist about dangers of generalisation.I know exactly what you mean. Most women aren't misandrists but radical feminist spaces attract the minority of women who are like moths to a light. The subreddit "men and females", for instance, will post a genuinely offensive sexist comment by some man, some women will respond by saying something like "that man is an asshole", while other women will say "men are assholes". I generally agree with the former comment but find the latter offensive. However, I try to remain polite and instead of be… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 01:56 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter