TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZippityD Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by ZippityD on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes, this is all important. Slight correction: over 50% of breast cancers (majority) are in women age 50-70. About 30% are in over 70. About 20% are under age 50. At least in Canada
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:49 PM
7

deleted
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:57 PM
3

deleted
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:37 PM
1

deleted
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:29 PM
-16

deleted
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:08 PM
2

I'm hesitant to discuss the challenges I face, or my female friends face, here (...) This is, of course, fine. If I'm browsing TrollX I wouldn't try to make my "well, as a man..." voice particularly loud. It's not really the intent of their sub, despite exceptions. I also see many of the challenges women face being minimised - much like your own were, as a consequence of your gender. In my view, that's one of the cruxes of the problem: if an issue is minimised or disregarded, those who don't dir…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:21 PM
2

Part of the issue some people have with feminism is a matter of how broad the definition is. We have many historical forms and viewpoints built around many purposes. In the modern day, we still have a great variety of people with a great variety of views who claim the title for themselves. So we end up losing the unity aspect, and on a medium like this we hear the loudest voices rather than the most considered thoughts. I'm sure you can imagine how this builds itself over time. If I don't specif…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:19 PM
1

I sort of get what they are saying, if you substitute patriarchy for whatever word means the rich are in charge (plutocracy?). That's the biggest real social inequality, and it has been for a great long time. There was a long stint where those rich people were all white males, but it's not the case anymore and we still have massive inequalities between those with wealth and those without. Rules of the economic game continue to be skewed towards less movement between class levels. So if you want …
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:39 PM
1

The Iron Lady was called that because of her incredible gym routine and rock hard body, right? At least that's how I choose to remember her.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:31 PM
–

I'll humbly suggest you not take a single word written there as even containing a grain of truth. It's an open blog. Please check the other articles written by that author. She's batshit crazy. Her opinion isn't worth a fart in the breeze. We've got stories by her on the moon landing being faked because patriarchy, on how she would fuck Hitler and is upset her friend would not, on banning men from the military, on Australia being evil, on women being useless after 30, etc. One example, not even …
/r/seduction13/07/16 01:47 PM
–

Yeah. It's not an underrepresented minority. If you tick that just for being female, I'm betting they ignore it.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 07:12 PM
–

Could be worth asking to have that reversed, since it's not their policy in any way. Besides, trollx is the real shit :).
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:10 AM
2

Those arguing with you should specify Humanities.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:31 AM
2

Yeah, that Title IX business really helped explain a bit of how this whole mess began to develop. There's clearly unintended consequences with that vague declaration.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:43 AM
0

Perhaps that is one of those inconsistencies between colleges.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:40 AM
18

Here is a great debate on that exact topic, where they go into detail about the current American practice of colleges managing sexual assault cases. It's the only one I've seen on the matter with reasonable, respectful, intelligent people arguing each side. The audience is polled before and after.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:11 AM
1

Who is "we"? Not all humanity, I assume. Regardless, it is a very real truth in some societies. It means there are legal and cultural acceptance. For a more farcical one, see Game of Thrones. Sexual violence is, along with other violence, a day to day reality committed by characters of all status levels. For a more sobering example, see the DRC. It's quite normal there, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:33 PM
7

The rape culture theory has significant flaws but the basis of the idea is not on frequency of rapes committed. It refers to normalization of rape, ingrained within a society, due to gender attitudes and social factors. There's big flaws with applying the idea to western societies, but let's criticize accurately.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 03:41 PM
8

Best description of 'be yourself' I've read.
/r/seduction04/08/15 08:28 PM
22

Thanks. I come off snarky, rereading my post, but it is a good article. The most interesting part to me is how generalizable the pieces are towards all social interactions.
/r/seduction23/07/15 04:44 PM
88

Detailed summary: Excitement is contagious. Empathy in general is fun. And involuntary. Conclusion: display positive affect and others will feel it as well. Anything I missed? The rest rambles, repeats, and gives context.
/r/seduction23/07/15 04:04 PM
1

I would offer that the vast majority (with only the video info to go off of) would see this as an obscure, frivolous, and ridiculous case that should be thrown out, with potential countersuit for legal fees being a reasonable outcome.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:40 PM
6

Shadowban is a reddit-wide ban from admins. It causes your comments and submissions to be invisible to others, unless a subreddit mod specifically approves it like just happened above. There are reasons for it, such as for some automated spam bots. But it's a back room process. /r/shadowban has more info in their sticky and sidebar and can check if you are shadowbanned. The most common reason for normal users to get shadowbanned, as far as we know, is 'brigading'. You are not allowed to vote or …
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:00 PM
2

I'm also not RP, but I think I have a small grasp on the hatred perspective. That whole RP group has large amounts of men who feel very cheated and lied to. Many of their views are changing and fluid. They're angry and can lash out, as far as internet comments go haha. It may not be a hatred, but it can read exactly like one. Plenty of insults and slurs aimed squarely at the groups they are upset with. Then, consider their views on agency. Central to the movement is the denial of agency partiall…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 02:16 PM
3

I'm not into the RP philosophy. But if they are achieving the goal of scoring with women they find attractive, I don't see why it isn't 'natural'. Is any desirability besides face symmetry and height completely natural? If it's effective for them, it can be called desirable in some way to some people, regardless of scummyness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 02:11 PM
7

In the video interview, near bye end, it mentions she developed severe depression near the end and checked in to a hospital. I assume the book elaborates.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:54 PM
0

That's true, thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:11 AM
7

I'd like to add that borderline personality disorder is quite a thing to see. With someone considering you as the greatest thing, who has a personality disorder, they might be incredible towards you. They might be incapable of seeing a fault. But when that fades, even years later, you flip. They go from seeing no fault to seeing absolutely no good in you. It's a flip of extremes, not comprehending you as a person with a range of features. It's important to note how your partner treats others. So…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:48 PM
1

Lawsuits in medicine are more correlated with how a patient feels. It's a real life case of feels > reals. If bedside manner is maintained, many less competent doctors avoid lawsuits. So it doesn't necessarily go by gender. Obvious fuck ups are not what most things are. It's all about the borderline, stuff that might stick, and what happens when you're the 1% with poor outcomes. More women than men becoming physicians is the trend. Surgery isn't necessarily an exception. Consider that obstetrics…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:15 PM
31

No it's okay because the current fear narrative is Islam and that connection remains to be established.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:23 AM
12

Fights causing injury did indeed go to court at my highschool. Kids ended up punished with things such as significant community service. It's a strong response but appropriate in any workplace. So, some would suggest high school culture needs the change.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:04 AM
5

assuming that they stayed relatively the same That would be a pretty strong condition.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 06:30 AM
5

Prostate cancer is an especially interesting one because we are living longer. It generally hits you after 60, as that graph shows. But their "1 in 8" stat is a huge underestimate of how many people get prostate cancer and just don't know it. Some think we would all get it if we lived long enough. Prostate cancer usually takes ten years to get to you, and life expectancy at diagnosis is often shorter than that anyways so the cancer is considered irrelevant. But as we live longer, it matters more…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:09 PM
1

Ah, I see. I was thinking more of the social norm. I'm not in touch with the exhibitionist community but I do know it's out there!
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:39 PM
2

If it's intended for satisfaction or advancement of one's own sexual desires at the expense of the emotional comfort of another, that is the very definition of creepy and so probably won't casually happen. If you're just interested in nudity, and not sexualizing it, consider a nudist colony or resort. I believe some let you vacation there? But yeah the general situation is very interesting!
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:36 PM
2

I think the questions you posed about toplessness were taken as a joke because of how we interpret your last question. In the context of showing breasts being sexualized, the tone of that question suggests that your intent might be for yourself rather than a curiosity about the situation. In our culture it's a bit absurd that one would seek to convince women around him/her to be topless more, so that should explain why it was taken as a joke.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:08 PM
0

That's unfortunate. I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:56 PM
0

I hasn't heard of that one! I'll explore. Thanks for the knowledge.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:55 PM
2

You have some insightful commentary! Thanks for the read. On games, I retain hope that sexism will slowly leave the scene. It definitely exists for many games, but I find that it is combated most effectively with role models. If you find yourself with time, I would encourage watching www.twitch.tv/itshafu sometime. Twitch is a game streaming website, where streamers can make a living through ads or subscriptions from fans. Hafu is a great gamer, and her channel is well moderated. We had a discus…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:52 PM
0

Sometimes it is worth appealing. I was banned from /r/feminism for replying in a troll post, which lumped me in with a bunch of actual trolls. I messaged them asked what I was banned for and requesting appeal, and was immediately unbanned with an apology and explanation. I know that's a bit different, but it illustrates that unbanning is possible.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:29 PM
4

Dissent isn't trolling, and I don't think that was the suggestion. Rather, differing opinions in some forms were considered "off topic". The justification is that large parts of the subreddit population are not feminists, and would destroy any conversation happening. It's not something I agree with, but I think that's what is being advocated in my opinion.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:18 PM
8

Try again in /r/askfeminists. The discussion would be interesting.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:12 PM
-1

It could be worth hanging out in /r/askfeminists :-).
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:11 PM
20

Man, you're going to be so happy you weren't somehow drunkenly persuaded in a few years when you see her face on the news titled "serial killer captured".
/r/MensRights22/05/14 07:07 PM
0

Example - older individuals with self proclaimed faith are less likely to commit suicide or have other mental health problems. Their faith provides immediate community with common purpose. We found that 90 percent [of the participants] reported they obtained a great deal of support and comfort from their religion, and that this support from religion and friends was related to overall lower mental health problems--including thoughts of suicide
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 02:00 PM
3

Borrowing words from /r/medicine. From the study, 12/1110 (1.1%) of women got pregnant using the morning after pill that had normal BMI vs 4/377 (1.1%) of women with BMI 25-29.9 vs 6/227 (2.6%) in women with a BMI > 30. The levonorgestrel figures are 1.3%, 2.5%, and 5.8% respectively. For comparison, the chance of getting pregnant following a single randomly timed encounter is 4-6%.
/r/RedPillWomen26/11/13 04:19 AM
6

According to the comments where this is posted in r/videos (supported with some debunking that is convincing), this guy does a ton of fake videos. I wouldn't expect this one to be real. For analysis of effect of money on perception in our culture, might be better to look elsewhere, whether or not he is correct on the assertion.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 07:19 PM
3

You're required to clap, far as I know. Part of the deal.
/r/seduction10/10/13 09:52 AM
23

You may be interested in a related development. Currently under phase 3 clinical trials in India, the development of a temporary vasectomy is underway. It's not really a vasectomy - the vas deferens is filled with a polymer gel instead of cut. This way you can inject a solution to dissolve that polymer when you wish to have children. Although minor concerns exist, this should be much more successful than vasectomy reversal surgery. You can read about it here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revers…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/13 06:17 PM
3

You're spot on about that. I read through the commentary here occasionally, and while I do not agree with all of it there is interesting stuff that provides a perspective I don't often have. Moderation to keep too many people like myself from controlling content is necessary to maintain stated goals of the subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 07:23 PM
6

The post you replied to was a good read too, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:56 PM
2

Oh I don't know. I've been seeing some nice gender neutral shows - House of Cards for example. But maybe Netflix doesn't count?
/r/TheRedPill14/08/13 11:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter