TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zoltrahn Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by Zoltrahn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

because the evidence is clear that with IPV men are pretty much victims as often as women are and that women initiate more IPV. That isn't an anecdote. That is data and facts, which we should be using. That is my point.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:23 AM
3

So tell them the data. Just because they don't go out and look for it on their own doesn't mean they aren't interested or would at least listen to it. There is all sorts of information on important topics that people don't educate themselves about. That doesn't mean they are completely opposed to hearing about a topic they aren't familiar with. The question itself implies someone wants to start a dialogue. If your first reaction is disbelief in them actually wanting a real discussion, how on ear…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:21 AM
1

I'm not quite sure we do agree, unless I'm misunderstanding your argument. I'm saying, people don't know the actual data. It isn't that they don't care about it, just that they are ignorant of it. Statistics absolutely should be used in arguments for why the movement is needed, instead of just anecdotes that appeal to emotion.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:59 AM
2

You think the majority of the people who are against the MRM have done in depth research into gender issues rather than listen to talking points constantly repeated in the media? We aren't trying to convince the hardliners of the opposite side. We are trying to convince the people who are simply unaware of the actual facts and motives.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:37 AM
1

The whole context of this question is when someone asks "Do we even need a men's rights movement?" When someone is asking that question, their implied stance is it isn't needed. If we are going to make the most convincing argument, it shouldn't be by anecdote. It should be issues that men deal with as a whole. For someone who doesn't believe the way we do, they will brush it off as rare occurrences. I see too many people thinking the same tactics used to preach to the choir here is going to work…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:25 AM
2

Yeah, what is the real problem here: women not standing up to child marriage or a culture that allows grown men to marry child brides as property? I'm tired of these incredibly weak arguments.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:43 AM
2

So the most convincing argument for someone who currently doesn't believe we don't need the movement is to ask them to come up with one? That is some top tier debating right there.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:36 AM
1

That is easily countered by anecdotes of cases of domestic violence. Our argument should be more compelling than, "I know some terrible women who have done shitty things to men."
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:32 AM
2

Really bothers me the top five answers aren't much more than, "Well women have their group!" How is anyone expected to take a movement seriously when asked what their objective is answered with a question of "Why not?" That is one of the least compelling arguments possible. If a movement is needed, the issues and goals should be easily and clearly stated. That shouldn't be a problem, because there are many. For example: suicide rate, mental health and social acceptance, work place fatalities, pa…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:26 AM
2

I don't know of any campaign specifically directed towards women. On top of that, there shouldn't be. Child abuse is child abuse and shouldn't be tolerated, regardless of who the perpetrator is. There are tons of child abuse prevention efforts that are intended for both men and women.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:56 AM
1

That is absolutely not true.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 09:25 PM
1

This line of thinking is what bothers me about this sub sometimes. A lot of people here seem to think inequality is completely one sided. That men are the only ones that face discrimination. That isn't how it works. Both genders have legitimate complaints about inequality, discrimination (justice and social), and the social expectations for a gender. Of course there are always going to be disagreements over how to address these issues or if certain things are even issues at all. This girl's mess…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:16 PM
6

The movie was still made by a woman. Tons of films are made by women, that aren't about women. Most films made by women aren't about feminist issues. If you truly know what the movie is about and how well shot it was, this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. If you only read the title without context, yeah it seems ironic on its face, but in reality it isn't.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:14 AM
30

The perception of the MRM and how men are treated unequally in the age of equality. It was made by a feminist that came to understand a lot of the complaints this sub has. Here is the trailer.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:23 PM
116

I mean, it isn't that ironic if you know what the movie is about.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:54 PM
1

Probably true, but The Red Pill has popped up on some news sites before and when it is mentioned, they usually try to link them to the MRM. I personally want nothing to do with that group. There are probably some people on here who are members over there, but the two are not linked, nor should they be.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 12:01 AM
-8

I'm not saying I agree with it, but there is a small difference. Voting for a woman is voting for the first major party female candidate in history. Voting for a man is voting for the status quo. I can see why a candidate who is a first brings out voters who wouldn't have voted for either candidate if they were the same, run of the mill, candidates. The same way Obama's candidacy brought out many voters who wouldn't have normally voted in an election. Race and gender aren't the best reasons for …
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:42 PM
61

Sounds incontinent to me ftfy
/r/MensRights04/09/16 02:19 PM
5

True. She was the setup, Louis was the joke.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:26 PM
5

Hey Lewis Black is hilarious though. It isn't so much about yelling as it is rage. Saw him in person a couple years ago. Him and his opening act were both killer.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:09 AM
27

Her skit with Louis CK was hilarious, but mostly by making fun of Leslie Jones' stereotypical character role she always plays.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:06 AM
2

This sub isn't anti-feminist. It is pro-men's rights. It may butt heads with so called feminists all the time, but that isn't the point of it. It is for standing up for equality. This video really shouldn't be here.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:40 AM
4

That definitely is the most pragmatic approach. I was only speaking idealistically.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:46 PM
16

Still seems like discrimination to me. What if my free time for a workout only falls inside women's hours? What if a woman's free time for a workout only falls inside men's hours? It also reinforces the stereotype that men are predators.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:04 PM
2

"Women...need safe spaces in ways that men don't." Ok then you clearly aren't an adult like the rest of us and don't deserve the same rights. I believe women are 100% capable of doing all the things required from an adult human, therefore they should be treated like one. It is the feminist movement that is telling women they aren't as powerful as men, and that is bullshit. Behave like an adult and you will be treated like one. Behave like a child and you, again, will be treated like one. Creatin…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:57 PM
11

So frustrating that there are emergency services that are understaffed, because there are quotas like these. I don't care the gender of the first responder saving my life or putting out the fire burning my house down. If there aren't qualified women applying, hire the fucking men!
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:24 PM
11

There was a post on here a while ago that showed men are more likely to go to jail if they call the police to report domestic violence.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:45 AM
3

Hopefully. Rousey is just the complete package of skill and personality. I just don't see anyone else capable of producing the same amount of excitement for MMA in waiting. I hope I'm wrong though.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:41 AM
1

Rousey isn't going to be around forever though. I'm wondering if there will be someone to fill her shoes after she retires, which isn't too far away. No other female fighter even comes close to her level of success or popularity.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:03 AM
3

They can still benefit the species if you are looking at it from ah objective point of view. Gay couples can raise orphaned children or children put up for adoption, while not adding to the problem of parentless children. Humans right now don't have any problem with procreation. If anything, there is too much procreation. A certain percentage of the population not procreating is a much better alternative to population control than say starvation due to lack of food or other population limiting f…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:55 AM
-2

That signs arrow is closer to the right side, which is possibly a gate, not the middle turnstile.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/15 11:12 PM
14

The lack of punctuation and bad grammar really bothers me with this.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:44 PM
2

Why should a verbal argument ever turn physical? Anyone who resorts to violence to resolve a verbal argument is in the wrong, regardless of gender. Without added context, this is just somebody overreacting. If you can't see that, then you are fucking stupid. There is no pass being denied here. Also expecting a significant other to defend them isn't ridiculous. If someone hit my partner, I'd defend them. That isn't white knighting, it's being loyal to your relationship.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/15 01:48 AM
-3

Yeah, this sub has turned into people wanting to see women beat up rather than women expecting privilege and not getting it. The word misogynistic is thrown around way too often, but is exactly what this sub has turned into.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/15 08:43 AM
1

Not sure what she was trying to get a pass on. This just looks like the guy is completely over reacting. Without context, this just makes the guy look bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/15 06:35 PM
6

Well, to be honest, I don't see why it should be in /r/politics. It is a criminal case that went exactly the way it should.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:43 AM
1

Which I already said multiple times, I have absolutely no problem with. When it dominates the discussion, that is another issue. Apparently, that is too complicated an issue for you to understand.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:59 AM
0

When did I ever say something like that should be deleted? Please point out where. Was the entire discussion of the post revolving around that? No. Again, you are taking my points to the extreme, which they aren't.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:32 AM
0

The expectation that every thread should be open to argument over foundational values is what I was responding to, not that every thread is like that.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:47 AM
0

All I am saying is that the overall discussion should pertain to the subreddit. Not every sub should be your soapbox to argue your point. That doesn't mean that you can't have a discussion here or there over the controversial topic, but that shouldn't be the prevailing conversation unless the sub pertains to it. That doesn't mean the slightest hint of decent should be banned and all comments deleted. You are taking such an absolutist approach to this. For fucks sake, I just want to browse a ligh…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:38 AM
-2

If she wanted to ban the sub, then why didn't she? I'm just saying there is plenty of shit, without leveling baseless attacks against her, to complain about. It looks childish when you start to blame everything, without proof, against someone.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:29 AM
1

I'm just saying there is a forum for different types of discussion. I'm tired of people posting hot topic issues in subs that it loosely fits, at best, to get upvotes. Keep content to the subs that they fit in. When everything spills over into every sub, subs become pointless. Some subs are lighthearted and just for laughs. Others are for serious, in-depth discussion. Just keep posts/comments related to the sub. That doesn't mean off topic discussion can't exist, but it shouldn't dominate the di…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:51 AM
2

Yeah, /r/nottheonion is for strange titled, odd news stories, not debating/ranting about hot button issues. There are plenty of subs where you go and expect to find those discussions. There is a reason reddit isn't just /r/all.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:24 AM
3

All I am saying is attribute blame when there is proof. When identical situations have happened on that sub, which mods have owned up to, why blame Pao? Because some vague article without sources alludes to her involvement? It doesn't even say Pao did it. Tired of knee jerk reactions off of titles/thumbnails.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:29 AM
1

There is plenty of other things that we do know about her to judge her on. Why start attaching stories like this, with zero proof of her involvement? It weakens actual criticism of her when everything is tried to be tied to her. There have been nearly identical situations on that exact same sub of mods taking down articles like that, which the mods have taken responsibility for.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:23 AM
-2

There isn't proof of that though, while there is lots of proof of there being overly controlling mods. I'm no fan of Pao, but running around and blaming everything wrong with reddit on her without proof isn't right either.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:32 AM
275

I highly doubt Pao had anything to do with this post being taken down. It was most likely a moderator, not a reddit admin, that removed the post. The article doesn't make it clear, just that "Reddit" did it. Similar article have been taken down in /r/nottheonion when the comments turned into a shitstorm. I'm not saying I agree with it, but lets focus our outrage to who is actually censoring stuff.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:31 AM
-2

Nobody is ignoring it. I said she was wrong, but the adult thing to do is to let the people responsible for dealing with unruly fans to do their job and remove them. Escalating the situation further is just childish, just like she was acting.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/15 09:08 PM
4

A thunderstick is in inflatable plastic stick you bang together to make noise. You can't harm a fly with it. Seems like a bit of an overreaction to punch someone over it, but she was in the wrong. Should have let security deal with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/15 07:47 PM
13

Well he did link to Rosa Parks' wiki page for some reason.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:29 AM
22

Pretty sure he meant children who were behaving better than she was.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/15 06:27 PM
3

Then lets argue against those ludicrous ideas. I'm tired of arguing over labels. Having privilege of any kind doesn't negate discrimination you face in another part of your life.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:01 AM
4

Just because other people have it worse, doesn't mean problems aren't problems. Even us privileged westerners, male or female, face difficult issues. This isn't a zero sum game.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 08:48 AM
2

I'm all for fighting against these crazy feminists, but I don't think clogging up resources for real victims is the correct approach.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:38 AM
2

I believe I covered that when I said, "other media outlets pushing an agenda." Fox was just the first one to pop to mind, because of this video. I agree that it is a common tactic used by all political ideologies, because it is easy and works.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 01:12 AM
14

It is a classic tactic used by Fox News and other media outlets pushing an agenda. They start down a road of thinking by saying "Some people say..." It is a way of bringing up some asinine idea, while not having to take the blame for it. Who said it? Not them, just someone. It is a really shitty tactic that has no place in journalism.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:49 PM
2

Stealing trash is still a crime. I'm not sure how DNA theft is any less of a crime in your mind. My DNA material is mine. Stealing it is a violation of my body.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:25 PM
3

Is theft ok as long as no one notices something has been stolen? If someone is raped while unconscious and never find out about it, is that still a crime? The lack of knowledge doesn't make it any less of a crime. No one has the right to steal my DNA and do with it as they please. That is part of me and no one else owns it, but me. Taking it without my expressed consent is theft.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 12:46 PM
1

It is sensible and reasonable that they would still try to hire the best candidates, but at the same time contradicting their stated purpose. This is just pointing out the hypocrisy. After going to the organization's webpage, it looks like there was a bill passed in Australia, starting this October, to implement some sort of system to make employment more balanced between the genders.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:19 PM
14

This is a government agency that is centered around equality, not a private business out to make a profit. I get what you are saying and would agree if it was a private business.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:05 PM
2

What field are you in?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:02 PM
2

Where does it say they told him they were going out for food? The source of your quote states this just above what you quoted: Holle allowed his four co-defendants to borrow his car after they talked about stealing a safe from Snyder's home and beating her. He did not accompany his friends during the crime. That seems like a very loose association, but it isn't none at all. It doesn't say thee explicitly told them that was what they were going to use the car for though. He obviously doesn't dese…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:07 AM
14

I think you need to reread what he said. He is agreeing with everything you said. If anyone DURING sex becomes uncomfortable and wants it to stop, has the right to request what is happening to stop. If someone regrets what happened AFTER the sex has ended, they do not have the right to cry rape retroactively.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:44 PM
-1

Read his first sentence again.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:10 PM
2

How would slapping a distraught person do anything to control the situation? Restrain her, put her in cuffs and be done with the matter. That would be controlling the situation.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:40 AM
2

I've always wondered how many people have jobs where they can pull stunts like these and not get in trouble. I think that is taking it a bit far for a symbolic holiday. It isn't like all women get that day off work or anything.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:01 AM
-1

Again, he is wearing a uniform, therefore he isn't off duty. I still don't see how you are so sure that she slapped him because he is a man. Maybe she hates all police officers. You can't read her thoughts from a 20 second clip. You are projecting what you want her to believe. This sub isn't just a place for posting videos of women acting up. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone to defend the woman smacking the officer. I don't see any men's rights in danger here.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:07 AM
3

An officer in uniform is never "off duty." When you wear the uniform, you represent the law. He wasn't trying to restrain her or protect himself. Officers should have better conduct than those they are trying to control, regardless of gender. We don't know what was going through her head either. If he was off duty in civilian clothes, this would be a different conversation. They were both acting like children. Neither of them was right for what they did and I don't see how this has to do anythin…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:55 PM
1

Law enforcement should have more restraint than that. The officer let his personal feelings control him. The woman was out of line for smacking him, but I don't think this contributes to any real meaningful conversation in this sub though.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:32 PM
4

Selective Service is a last resort. Something no one ever wants to use, but if you need it, you want it setup already. You don't buy spare tire after you get a flat. It is important to our national security.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:52 PM
11

It's an ethical issue, not a legal one. The press shouldn't be bullied into only giving one side of the debate.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:41 PM
1

Actually it is the mother who contributed the egg who goes on the birth certificate, even when a surrogate is used.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:09 PM
3

So the best way to fight sexism is to ignore the propaganda of large institutions like this?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:36 PM
8

I wish I got harassment treats. :(
/r/MensRights29/04/14 01:42 PM
0

Getting the correct sentencing for the attempted murder of a child isn't male discrimination. This is just a failure of the justice system. Discrimination would be men getting overly harsh punishments, which I don't believe is the case when it comes to the attempted murder of a child.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:14 PM
34

Not when a full blown witch hunt is going on
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:55 PM
1

The article is completely biased garbage. I wasn't trying to defend it at all. No one should have ultimate control over someone else's body. I was just saying that the idea that spouses should have input on cosmetic surgery isn't a bad thing. Her reasoning and one sidedness are still insulting. Reverse the genders in the article and it is still just as terrible.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:11 PM
17

Service charges are pointless. Cover the costs of whatever it is you are selling in the price. It just goes to show you how arbitrary that fee is anyways. It doesn't cost anyone $4.50 more just because the customer has a penis instead of a vagina. I'm more outraged by the service cost idea by itself without the price discrepancy between genders.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:10 PM
4

I believe anyone in a marriage should get consent, or at least discuss the procedure before it happens. These are two people who share their life together. Spouses should have some say in the matter, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:31 PM
1

That is true, but he should not have had sex then. This is called slut shaming by feminists. It is wrong for both sides to argue for complete abstinence, because it is impractical. There is a clear inequality when it comes to reproductive rights in the US. Neither is ideal for women or men, but men have less options when it comes to paternal responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:56 PM
1

Very true, not all women are supported in admitting they are not ready for motherhood. Although it is almost universally condemned when men do the same with fatherhood.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:50 PM
1

Most domestic violence reports are taken seriously regardless of gender by police these days. There are rare cases where they don't, but your idea of it being ignored a majority of the time is simply not true.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 02:00 AM
8

Falsely accusing isn't gendered either. The hypocrisy of your statement is pretty obvious. It may happen more often with females, but isn't impossible for men to do. False domestic abuse reports can be filed by anyone.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 03:19 PM
18

Except when even talking about it comes off as weak. Sure, communication should be open, but often it isn't.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:25 PM
8

That is cool and all, but I don't think circlejerk made up 4chan stories is anyway to promote this idea and makes the sub look stupid for upvoting it.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 06:52 PM
62

Although I agree with what "she" said, this post is incredibly circlejerky and sounds made up.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter