TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZombieOmNom Archive

View 3 posts and 226 comments by ZombieOmNom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's been done already. The mechanics of the collapse of the WTC complex has been investigated, modeled, and explained in every way conceivable. All the information is right there for people to read if they're willing to look it up. The collapse of the three towers on 9/11 is not some big mystery that is baffling engineers and scientists. In fact it's very well understood. The problem is that "9/11 truthers" are not actually interested in facts. They're interested in living in fantasy. They find…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 11:56 PM
2

If you don't want to see things you can not see them. This is the problem with 9/11; the truth is much more mundane than the conspiracy theories. People don't want to see evidence that debunks conspiracy theories because that's boring. No amount of scientific evidence or logic can convince them to abandon their fantasy world because they're having far too much fun wallowing in their own ignorance.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 05:56 PM
2

As an architect specializing in structural engineering, you don't need nano-thermite to bring a steel skyscraper down; when you half-ass the fireproofing and sprinkler system the way they did, the heat of the fire will expand the floor beams so much that they will push the girders they rest on right out of their seats. So what happened was the fires burned out of control for hours, long enough to heat the floor beams enough that they pushed an important girder out of it's seat, which in turn rem…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 03:25 PM
1

This is an interesting answer. I agree with your point re: 2, in so far as it's important to actively seek a vantage point in life. I had previously been in a situation beyond my control, where I was replaceable both at work and at home. I had to suck a lot of metaphorical dick because in both circumstances those who had 'control' used my vulnerable status as an opening to use me as an emotional punching bag. If I wasn't careful I could end up jobless and homeless. A lot of hard work later and I…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 09:14 PM
2

Most jokes that are 'at the expense' of the individual are not 'fun' for the individual if they're being honest. People don't revel in their flaws. My boss is the one who needs to realize my value, and it's perfectly logical to fear getting fired by an unreasonable boss. I don't like people who are the center of attention. I like to feel equal with my friends. I also dislike posturing and people who try to upset my frame. I want to intimidate these guys a little.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 07:06 PM
3

I think the problem here is that I don't need to be visibly afraid for the boss to know what I'd be afraid of, because every boss has the power to realize his employee's fears; getting fired. It seems to me that there are three ways around this: Convince your boss that being nice to you makes his job easier because it gets better results. Bluff that you don't actually need your job, it's just extra spending money on top of what the wife earns. Thus his only leverage will be offering favours in r…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 06:53 PM
3

My standard response to someone making a joke at my expense is "haha, you're right, it IS pretty funny when you project your insecurity onto me". This usually works because it's pretty succinct and nobody expects it. As for the asking innocent questions of the Mr-Cool, I fear that this may be a little transparent - last thing I'd want would be for this guy to figure out that I want to break down his control of the floor. I was thinking more along the lines of something like deflecting the group …
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 06:45 PM
3

I find this topic quite interesting. I'm happily attached and therefore have no interest in TRP for dating purposes, but I do find the idea of gaining 'power' to be interesting. I have a few scenarios that I'm curious to know how best to react to: Someone has made a joke at your expense, people around them find this funny. Lets assume you're at work and these are colleagues. You're pretty sure that your boss can smell your fear and seems to want to just beat you down in every interaction. Your f…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 04:52 PM
0

LOL. Being a humongous bitch is a personality trait, not a biological function. Personality and psychology =/= biology. Also, "all women are like that" is an extraordinary claim, and therefore requires extraordinary evidence. The burden of proof is on the one who made the claim, so good luck with that. You're clearly very bitter about your past failures in dating if you're willing to make such ridiculous leaps of logic. I find it telling that you use a gender as an insult. I don't think your pro…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:44 PM
–

awalt That's just a redpill narrative, it has no provable basis in reality. What IS provable in this situation however, is human behaviour. People don't like to think they've been unlucky in relationships, so this idea that the opposite gender is at fault is appealing to them. They can feel like they've escaped the relationship rat race while simultaneously relieving themselves of any concerns about being partly responsible. It's easy to see why it attracts the emotionally feeble.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:45 PM
–

That's what I'm saying. MGTOW is a ridiculous overreaction. The solution is just don't date a humongous bitch.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:22 PM
1

It's doable, it just takes discipline. You have to actively moderate what you channel your emotional energy into, and be willing to accept the presence of things that displease you. Take ownership and control of your feelings - it's really liberating, because it makes you invulnerable to the kind of people who would love nothing more than to derail your happiness. One of the easiest ways to achieve this is to give to charities. A charity is the crusade of an individual or many individuals who we…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:57 AM
2

Haha I love it. Someone needs to photoshop this onto the original.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:43 AM
–

Lol. MGTOW is the adult equivalent of a child holding it's breath as an act of protest.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:42 AM
1

The people who can answer this question need to check their oppressometer privilege.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:36 PM
–

I personally find the term "man-flu" to be extremely offensive because it's misandrist and toxic gender stereotyping. I've walked out on a number of people who thought they were being "funny" using that term, they then usually insist that I was being "oversensitive". More often than not, along with this narrative you get the "women just get on with it" and "women are more capable of everything than men". As an egalitarian this attitude really rubs me the wrong way.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:23 PM
1

We can't take any of their word as gospel because they were just reddit accounts. The huge problem here is that their sentiment confirms a worldview in which women are evil disloyal bitches who just use men. If they were saying something pro-feminist then reddit, and specifically this sub, would be dismissing them and demanding proof. I hate this kind of double standard because it's something that's always pointed out as being a flaw in feminism, but really it's just a flaw of human nature in ge…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:17 PM
–

Title should read: "6 trolls who claim to be male strippers regurgitating horror stories that make insecure men paranoid". You could've told them that they throw oil wrestling orgies at almost every party and reddit would've believed it.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:11 PM
1

Well I've been to 10 bachelorette parties, and based on my analysis of the data that I collected from the research and surveys I conducted during those parties, 8 out of 10 men were rapists. /s So yes, we can all bullshit some anecdotes, pull some numbers out of our ass, and use them to reinforce our argument or justify our worldview that the female/male gender is the root cause of the problem. You carry on thinking that the behaviour of every single person in the world conforms to your narrow w…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:05 PM
1

MFW MGTOWs and redpills put "normal woman" into the "unicorn" category.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 09:53 PM
–

I think basing any kind of conclusion about how the general population behaves on 6 anecdotes is just asking to be biased. We're talking about women who ordered strippers. Why is it surprising to anyone that those women might have a slightly broken moral compass once the stripper arrives?
/r/MensRights09/08/15 09:45 PM
–

Lol you sound like a paranoid MGTOW. There are some women who are like this, but saying they all are is ridiculous. My girlfriend wouldn't do this for instance and would be horrified by the idea. In fact if we're doing a pre-wedding celebration at all, we'd do it together, because we hate being apart. Also she doesn't treat me like a "cock or a wallet". I think you maybe just need to date someone who isn't a humongous bitch.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 01:38 PM
4

This is because of a clashing difference in the way men and women are raised to deal with problems. Men are taught to solve problems they encounter in a direct, practical, and stoic fashion. They are told that this is a sign of strength, and that this is partly how they will be judged as a man. Women are taught to view their problems as a pretext to being entitled some sympathy. They are told that this is a sign of being in touch with their emotions, and that this is partly how they will be judg…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 12:19 AM
–

I've read about MGTOW and it's almost as bad as red pill/PUA nonsense. It's way out there into whackjob territory.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:03 AM
1

You'd think that if a woman can sue her husband for lack of sex, that men that never get any and never get to be in relationships might have a right to complain about their situation, wouldn't you? According to you, nope! That's a woman's right. That's a woman's privilege. Lol you're a fucking moron. Would you fuck an ugly woman? No? Right then, case closed. If people can't get laid because they're too ugly and/or obnoxious then that's their problem. They can "complain" all they want about how u…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:57 AM
–

Lol, sorry, but if men can't get laid that's their problem. The idea that women should fuck some guy she isn't even attracted to as part of her civic duty is absurd.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:48 AM
–

Fallacies on fallacies do not make good arguments. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:47 PM
–

Lol the MGTOW redpilling circlejerkers are out in force today. Your absolute lack of self awareness is astounding. Women not giving a large fraction of men a sex life leads to a highly dysfunctional society Really? How the fuck did you even come to this ridiculous conclusion in the first place?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:50 PM
–

Men don't owe women shit either. Then why bitch about "double standards"? If they're not interested in you because you aren't a certain height, who cares? At least they were up front about it rather than wasting people's time. Bitching about how "women don't want short men" is the same as SJW's bitching about how "men don't want fat women". It's a double standard on it's own. Yet a woman in france was able to sue her husband for lack of sex. Which has absolutely nothing to do with women on datin…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:42 PM
–

exclude 80% of males from having a sex life Lol. Women don't owe men a sex life. It's not "unfair to men" that they have preferences that don't include men of a specific attribute. If they find height to be such a dealbreaker then that's their problem, not yours. They're going to be picking from a ridiculously small pool of people - probably because that's how tall one of their ex's was. Have you stopped to consider the fact that the reason why they're single and using a dating site in the first…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:32 PM
4

Rule 5: Askreddit is not your soapbox, personal army, or advertising platform. Rule 7: Soliciting money, goods, services, or favors are not allowed. They will be removed. Rule 3: Askreddit is for open-ended discussion questions. Questions with definite answers, that can be researched elsewhere, provide a limited scope for discussion (yes/no, DAE, polls and surveys, etc.), or limit discussion are not appropriate.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 01:30 PM
3

The day that I need to take advice from a woman about "manning up" will be the day that I need to be taken out back and humanely shot.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:31 PM
2

I certainly hope you're right about that.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 07:43 PM
2

Apparently this company liked you so much they decided to just hand you the makings of a lawsuit that would pay out enough for you to retire on.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:31 AM
7

Even he doesn't sound totally sure about it in his writing, he comes off as being slightly brainwashed and deluded. As if he's convincing himself that it's okay, even though his selfish wife completely went off the radar because she fell asleep at the house of the guy she was fucking. That he only became okay with the idea after 6 months of alcohol and persuasion. Absolutely none of this marriage strikes me as being healthy. It's pretty clear she has no respect for him and is merely making super…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:17 PM
–

What the fuck did you think the rule was for? That we'd have to wait until some other source covered a hit piece on the MRM? For the same reasons we don't link to SRS. By linking to them we're giving them time of day. Gawker is gawker, it's just clickbait sensationalist crap. Whether we avoid giving them click revenue or not, we're still dignifying their bullshit with a response and cluttering up our sub.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:06 AM
–

So we can post Gawker so long as it's through an archive? How the fuck is that different? How the fuck is that not just circumventing the rules?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:17 PM
–

From the sidebar: No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites. So I've reported this karma train.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:58 PM
5

Obvious sarcasm was obvious.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 09:52 PM
8

Lol.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 09:51 PM
1

"I need some support from other guys" That's not what this sub is for though. If he'd posted about the lack of support networks as a primary topic, and the cheating as the secondary topic, then I could see how it would be a men's rights issue. The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon. His rights haven't been infringed, he was just cheated on. If all he wanted was a "damn, that sucks" then /r/relationships or /r/r…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:22 PM
–

I'm not sure I see how this is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:44 AM
0

Nah, its just an opportunity you wanted to use to target TRP when it wasn't talked about. Although I have nothing against random public condemnation of TRP, that's not the reason why I brought it up. He claimed that downvoting because of a username is the most anti-intellectual thing you could do, I countered him by pointing out that being a red piller is worse. Inferring that this means that I approve of downvoting just because of a username is a logical fallacy. But that's not going to stop yo…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:13 AM
3

That sounds remarkably similar to the future vision of the Nazi party.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:03 PM
1

downvote since you take such a strong stance of associating any posts content ... and linking those comments unrelated to his name Except that's not what I've done at any point, so at this point you just aren't paying attention. The only thing I'm guilty of is believing that TRP is a worse crime than people downvoting because of a username. Downvoting with poor sense on reddit is clearly worse than treating women like human garbage.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:29 PM
6

That is actually a fucking hilariously good idea.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:50 AM
6

Including the state that it's in. :P
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:50 AM
2

Jesus christ you're absolutely right. I select one comment, hold down the downvote key and it zips down the whole thread downvoting everything. D:
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:24 AM
–

Now that's random. Except it isn't at all. His username indicates his affiliation with TRP. People have a hard time taking any kind of opinion from someone who they have already established is aligned with a cause they disagree with. It's a pretty well documented part of the human condition known as confirmation bias. It makes complete sense that people downvote him for being the kind of asshole they wouldn't want to associate with. Welcome to reddit where the downvote button is an I-hate-you-an…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:20 AM
–

A pot-shot if I've ever seen one. Not really, it's just obvious enough to anyone with a rational mind that I felt no need to flesh it out with reasons.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:20 AM
–

Let me ask you this: if you hate society so much why are you so desperate to communicate with it using music?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:48 AM
–

Your response to me just comes off as verbal diarrhea, excuses and delusion. Here's your problem; you think you're a victim of the society you live in. Modern western society is not "unfair" to people with ethics, it's not intolerant of alternative cultures, it just has a low bullshit threshold. People will listen to anything you have to say within reason, it just depends on how you frame it. Most people cannot abide the hypocritical faux-rebellious non-conformist conformity. For instance I smok…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:44 AM
3

This is really fucking good advice and a code that I pretty much live by.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:05 AM
–

I use RES and can't see how I'd be able to do that... would you mind explaining?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:02 AM
–

the lowest of anti-intellectual nonsense. Honestly I'd say that TRP takes that prize.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:00 AM
–

I was subbed to FPH for a while and it's probably one of the most misunderstood subs on reddit - unfortunately, that's what led to the problem in the first place. It was a satirical circle-jerk sub that was supposed to be an antidote to pro-fat SJWs while being an opposite-spectrum parody, but people frequently missed the subtlety and they'd join in with a genuine hatred of fat people. None of the FPH members were able to tell the difference between the people being serious and the people who we…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:54 PM
–

I dunno man, I took the time to actually look through your submission history and I think you need to take more ownership rather than blaming failure on things beyond your control. For example you make unironic use of the word cuckold in your blogs, you're a libertarian which is literally political and intellectual suicide, and your MGTOW-centric opinion posts indicate you have a false sense of perpetual victimhood. I mean c'mon man you're like two steps away from sounding like a full card carry…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:49 PM
2

Maybe go get some fried chicken, you know, see what happens.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:56 AM
2

Because they think it's a special kind of sexist condescension where men think that women are generally inept.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:40 AM
1

Which is why I agree that it's subjective bullshit. Feminists have a habit of thinking that bad things only happen to them, that men cannot experience patronizing or condescending tone. But I mean really? There are people further down the comment chain who genuinely believe that u/krissam's definition is the real thing.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 01:29 PM
–

Except that's not the definition at all. The actual definition: (of a man) explain (something) to someone, typically a woman, in a manner regarded as condescending or patronizing. Which is subjective bullshit, but jesus fucking christ, do we really have to resort to straw man arguments here? You can literally google the word "mansplaining" and get a definition that is completely different to yours.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 04:13 AM
8

That's clearly Hawaiian Superman's washroom. That's not a dress and hair clip, it's actually a cape and a patriotic hibiscus. Walking in there may be the manliest thing you'll ever do.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 12:24 AM
–

but there’s no doubt that the gender pay gap exists Yes there is. Saying women "earn less" is completely disingenuous. They actually work less, and this is the only "fact" that is supported by statistics. The really hilarious part of this bar's pricing, aside from it being completely fucking illegal, is that women often get their drinks bought for them by men.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 12:02 AM
1

Rape culture isn't a thing that exists in reality. It's just a false flag, like the pay gap. Girls who were raised to believe that guys are all sex predators generally have no fucking idea what guys actually talk about when they hang out alone. All they know is, they're terrified of men, so it's easy for them to believe that they'd be doing something bad. Then someone tells them about "rape culture" and from that point on they genuinely believe that when young guys all hang out together they pro…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:04 PM
7

It is indeed very illegal. This gym in Accrington has cropped up on this sub in the past.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:53 PM
–

I've said it before and I'll say it again; some people are just most comfortable when they're outraged by something. Intent is meaningless to these people. As far as they are concerned, everything is deliberate and evil. They come up with terms like "microaggression" because it absolves them from the responsibility of establishing intent, and lets them skip straight to being offended. At that point they can just fly off the handle at some poor fucker who doesn't understand how they could be unin…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:49 PM
2

That's because of his age not his gender.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:07 PM
–

It's thanks to the EU that it's illegal to offer cheaper car insurance to women. Many common sense laws that force employers to treat their employees like human beings and not slaves have come from the EU as well.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:01 AM
2

Your Italian blue silk gun?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:29 AM
–

Killing someone to keep them safe... that's an interesting concept right there.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:25 PM
–

Actually it was more your mangled attempt at English that made you sound racist, I just thought it was funny how poorly you worded it. Please tell me more about how racist I am.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:49 PM
–

You made it sound like you make a distinction between normal people and black people.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:26 PM
–

normal people LMAO. Did you mean "white people"?
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:06 PM
-1

A marriage is not the same as just a relationship, it comes with many assumptions for starters, from now on it will be widely assumed that in any domestic violence/cheating cases the hubby is to blame. LOL. You're talking about domestic violence! Clearly that's not a GOOD relationship! The same is true for unmarried couples. I'd say you are more so, I read stories on the above subs fully, I don't just go ''marriage? yep there's your problem''. YOU'RE READING HORROR STORIES. Go look up stories ab…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 05:16 PM
–

Which is a great cause of marriage being the suck fest that kills relationships Do you honestly believe that a relationship turns sour because "you COULD potentially screw me over IF we got divorced"? I can understand how that would make you feel trapped if the relationship already went bad, but I don't understand how that can be something that leads to a relationship falling apart in the first instance. ...And yet askmen/relationships/deadbedrooms and others are filled with stories about how gr…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 04:36 PM
–

Are you trying to convince us or yourself? If I needed to convince myself I wouldn't be doing it. This article and sub as a whole are quite cynical about marriage, and I wanted to give my reasons to contribute to the discussion. I'm not trying to "convince" anyone. I want people to see that marriage can be done for the right reasons if you have the right attitude about it. Most of what you have listed is essentially conditional on her good will for you. Perhaps you've missed the part where I cou…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 04:08 PM
–

I'm marrying my girlfriend because: I will legally be able to remain in the country with her (currently on working visa). I will legally be a part of her family, and she will legally be a part of mine. They will all be allowed to visit my deathbed, and I theirs. Our children will be entitled to dual citizenship. We will be entitled to various benefits as a family, such as family medical insurance and tax breaks. I love her and trust her enough to enter into a legal contract that binds us as a co…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 03:51 PM
2

That person was obviously in some kind of distress and needed help. But I thought that it was the consensus that when a man is presented with a woman in a vulnerable state, particularly a naked one, he will always automatically become a rapist. /s
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:07 PM
1

Yeah or that. The point was about printing the stats on a shirt/sweater.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:22 PM
–

You're essentially arguing that if you don't understand what constitutes rape, you can accidentally rape someone. You're saying that, given an inebriated or sleeping woman, a mild mutual attraction, and a general ignorance of rape, that cocktail would just naturally result in rape. I totally reject that concept. If that person wouldn't consent sober or awake, why would they consent drunk or sleeping? OR if you don't know that they would consent to it, why would you assume that waiting until they…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:34 AM
–

Example one: Not accidental, that's just rape. Example two: Not accidental either, that's also rape. I don't get why some people seem to think it's hard to figure this shit out. If he or she hasn't given you permission, you have no sexual history with that person, no agreement over what you're allowed to do with their body in such circumstances, then you shouldn't be touching them. I really resent the insinuation that men are incapable of working this out for themselves. I've yet to come across …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:51 PM
–

It all stems from this ludicrous idea that a man can be an "accidental rapist", because apparently in that scenario it's the man's failure to be clairvoyant rather than the woman's failure to communicate that causes it.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:23 PM
6

The intention of this survey.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:20 PM
2

And if she makes a puddle, you can lay your jacket down so she can walk over it without getting her feet we... oh wait nevermind.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:36 AM
–

I see what you did there. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:35 AM
–

Correct. You aren't allowed to charge less for the same service, but you are allowed gender segregated facilities if you can prove that there is no difference in the facilities, service, and pricing. If women are getting a "better product" as stated in the title of this video, then this gym is breaking the law.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:36 AM
–

Then it needs to be reported because the ECJ ruled that you can't discriminate against gender when providing a product or service.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:48 AM
–

This kind of gender discrimination is actually illegal in Europe.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:01 PM
2

The UK is a nation of people whose immediate response to anything which displeases them is to go home, make a cup of tea, and then write strongly worded letters to authorities, ombudsmen, and independent bodies of arbitration. It's cowardly, two faced, risk averse, confrontation averse, and passive aggressive. The average British person would rather stand at the top of a very high turret making general remarks which could be construed as insinuating that a person who fits the description is bein…
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:40 AM
8

Thank you so much for sharing this! This guy is absolutely fucking hilarious!
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:28 AM
–

I think pretty much anywhere on the planet is better than the UK's confrontation-averse, passive aggressive, cowardly SJW-centric society.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:02 AM
–

Revenge =/= equality. How ironic, racism and sexism at an anti-racism event. This is exactly the kind of shit that I'm fed up with in the UK. I'm emigrating to Canada and I honestly can't wait to get the fuck out of this backwards, tumblrina country.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:14 PM
1

I didn't follow gamergate at all because I knew it was total bullshit and just some nobody trying to grab some spotlight. So this comes as no surprise.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:34 PM
–

I would caution anyone going into this. Louis Theroux does little more than try to make a mockery of people.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:36 AM
0

I agree completely. I was one of the voices against the nonsense in that thread.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:32 PM
–

What's worse is this "you deserve better" bullshit, as if it's somehow shameful for men to benefit from NSA sex. Most reputable sex clubs require members to submit for disease screening and provide proof of contraception, as well as signing a release that nobody in the club can be held responsible for any pregnancy. These men may just as easily have been misled about the identity of this woman. She didn't get "used", she didn't disrespect herself either. Casual sex is not some shameful act that …
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:31 PM
1

I think that it's easier for the OP in that situation to respond to cherry picking than it is for Justicar to respond to total misrepresentation, but that's a valid point - cherry picking is indeed a weakness of that format. Justicar plays and pauses his way through the whole thing and will state how much he's skipped etc. Not many debaters will put in the thought or time to take steps like that. Just because he does things properly doesn't mean everyone will. Ultimately though, no format for de…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:29 AM
–

I really prefer Justicar when he goes on in his own words / voice like this rather than doing point by point responses to someone else. I'd caution you against having such a preference because sometimes it's not possible to make a good argument without doing so. In fact he's addressed this in several videos where the person he's debating with/responding to on youtube is not using the same point by point format, and is actually misrepresenting his points. It doesn't give the viewer the opportunit…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:48 AM
–

Hasta la vista, baby!
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:45 AM
–

What are you saying? I'm saying what I said in my comment. Anyone can call themselves a gamer if they consider themselves a gamer? No, I did not say that in my comment. Did you even read it? Anyone can call themselves a gamer if they so much as play candy crush for 5 minutes. I think most people have enough common sense to figure out that playing candy crush for 5 minutes doesn't make them a gamer. You're a gamer if you like games and play games in a way that it could be considered a hobby. And …
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:47 AM
–

You're making some very poor comparisons, and drawing conclusions from a definition of "gamer" that doesn't exist. You have arbitrarily made your own definition to fit the purposes of your argument. Just because you find a game simple, doesn't mean everyone will. For instance I can play a game really well on PC, but would suck at it on a console because I'm better at using a keyboard and mouse. There are types of games that I really suck at, and others that I'm really good at. This doesn't forfe…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:08 PM
–

I really hate it whenever I see this "Oh look! Sometimes there are men that aren't as good as women at something!" rhetoric. As if it's some kind of revelation. It's in the same category as the facebook memes that put down men as being inferior to women as a "joke" - always posted by women. I don't think I will ever understand the pathological desire to alienate one gender from the other.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:58 PM
1

Research will be done on women. Research will be done on men. To change focus means to shift attention away from something. What's needed is research into both genders, not some feelgood empowerment parade.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:25 PM
–

I didn't say they weren't different, I said that research was not gender specific. This means that both men and women have been researched in this subject, and this article reflects the information that has been gathered from that research. Research doesn't aim to be gender biased without good reason. Nobody has victimised women by excluding them from research. To repeat; the reason we know that male and female heart disease are different is because research was done on both genders. Doctors not…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:23 AM
–

Under-served where? If you have a medical and your doctor finds that you have heart disease, you aren't going to get told "sorry, I can't treat you because you're a woman and this is a man's disease". Research into the causes, early diagnosis, symptoms, and treatments for heart disease is not gender specific either. Awareness is important, but really doctors should be looking for these things when they perform medical checkups, I really don't think it needs a charity just to go around telling wo…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:34 AM
–

Because they're making it about gender when the issue is about a disease. It's a pissing contest just like it always is. If you spend too long looking into it you'd start to believe that "men" and "women" are actually rival football teams. Also I think a lot of people on this subreddit feel like radical feminists are trying to undermine any organization aimed at helping men. Feminists seem to think that men should be a servant underclass that doesn't qualify for any kind of medical, emotional, o…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:05 AM
2

I think it's a bit like saying that all cops beat innocent people. The problem exists but even if it's really widespread it doesn't ever extend to all cops. But for all intents and purposes, once calling the cops becomes a lottery where having a good one turn up is the less likely scenario, it might as well be all cops. I can't say what percentage of schools sweep bullying under the rug in order to maintain appearances. I don't think anyone really can. I don't want to believe that it's a lot, bu…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 04:47 PM
–

Is bullying bad? Of course it is. Moving on? See, this is the problem. "Bullying is bad" wasn't ever my argument. My argument was that schools deny that bullying happens, and that teachers are complicit in that. That the education system is the problem here because it has a policy of denial. I haven't given you a debate because you haven't debated me, you've just done your best to avoid it and foam about fallacies. My point, my entire point, is that you two claiming it's an epidemic is beyond ri…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 03:33 AM
–

At which point they turn into nothing but a squeaky-clean, PR spewing salesperson. That's all he's been since the beginning. He's flat out denying that anything is wrong with the education system itself and will not hear otherwise. Honestly dude, he's just going to have you arguing in circles until you get bored, there really isn't any point arguing with him further. He won't accept or respond to any of your valid points, and will instead just pick on whatever weak points he thinks he can find. …
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:35 AM
1

So we've gone from "there's nothing wrong with the education system" to "logical fallacy so your argument is invalid" to "we're on the same side, you just aren't reading my posts". I give up.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:23 AM
–

Sigh. You remind me of freshman year philosophy/sociology students who have just found out about logical fallacies and think they now have a magic weapon to win any argument by calling fallacy rather than having to form a rebuttal. It's called argument from fallacy and ironically enough it's a fallacy itself. I've already looked beyond my immediate experiences as you've so challenged me - I never held any view that the problem was systemic when teachers were refusing to help me with being bullie…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:47 PM
–

What are you basing your claim off of? My own experience being bullied, my friends experiences being bullied, my friends whose kids have been bullied, friends and family who have worked in the education system, internet forums where people are talking about their own experiences of being bullied... The list just goes on and on. Furthermore your argument that teachers can be held legally accountable is just a joke. All a teacher would have to do is totally deny witnessing the event, and the facul…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:04 PM
2

What kind of jumped up asshole do you have to be to suspend an elementary school boy for having a military style haircut? It's not a bright pink mohawk with swastikas and SS runes shaved into the sides.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:46 PM
–

I think you have your head in the clouds and your rose tinted spectacles on if you think he's wrong. Teachers care about one thing: covering their own ass. They'll deny bullying because it "makes the school look bad and makes the teachers look incompetent". Quote from a friend who worked in a school.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:42 PM
6

I think zeta describes me pretty well. Just totally removed from it, totally refusing to play the game, happy to be myself, not feeling any desire to conform to what other people want me to be. There was once a time when I used to give a shit but that time has long gone. Now I'm just me, take it or leave it.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:14 AM
–

Video games and porn don't judge me, call me useless, compare me to anyone else, cheat on me, manipulate, connive, bitch, nag, push, or in any way make me feel like I don't deserve to exist. Women fear and dislike video games and porn because they make them obsolete in the same way that vibrating sex toys make men obsolete. They're emancipating men, but women don't like that, they don't like the fact that their vagina no longer has any power over men. So they call anyone who watches porn and pla…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:52 PM
1

They aren't my social norms or your social norms, they're just social norms that exist. You can either go along with them or you can break those norms and catch a bunch of abuse for doing so. Don't hate the player hate the game.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:12 PM
1

saying that everyone who is lower class is a douche or doesn't deserve to exist is disgustingly snobbish. Nobody is saying that. That sentiment is nowhere to be found, not in this video, and not in any of the comments in this thread. That's just a straw man argument you've come up with because you can't/don't want to deal with what I'm actually saying. Either that or you're just listening to the little voices in your crazy head. Then you try to divert attention with this joke: So why don't you r…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:28 PM
1

You present "lad culture" as this working class hero. No, sorry to burst your bubble, but being a lad is just an excuse for being a cunt. "lad culture" hasn't built anything or done anything, it's not some charitable loveable happy go lucky scamp. Being a lad is walking into a bar and calling someone a poofter because they're wearing pink, telling a girl she has a fucking lovely rack, and then telling the barman he's a wanker because he's served someone else. How about you get your head out of t…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:02 PM
–

Your argument is pretty poor. You can't just say "I've heard his boss is kind of a cunt" as though that somehow absolves Clarkson, arguably king of the cunts, from throwing a pathetic hissy fit and then punching his boss because there was no hot food. I don't care if he's the most entertaining man who ever lived, he's a fucking prick and he needs to go, regardless of his boss. His gender doesn't matter in this debate, they were just trying to suggest that punching people is part of being a man a…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:27 AM
–

Firstly, funny as he may be, Clarkson is a vile human being, and absolutely should be fired for being physically aggressive at work. We're well past the times when you can treat people horribly and get away with it just because you are famous. The BBC are absolutely right to stick to their guns about this. I find that this whole debate of Clarkson's wrongdoing to be totally aside and separate from the argument for gender equality. He's unrelated here. As for whether Britain has become hostile to…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:56 AM
2

United States Constitution: No, they shouldn't.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:42 AM
1

Yeah I can't really make heads or tails of it either.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:05 AM
2

That's my point, I find it hard to believe as well. You can just sense his seething contempt for these people. Maybe he doesn't know about study parties and just assumed they're all about to become dropouts? Who knows. Either way he clearly resents them for having the social life that he lacks. Much of his story was really irrelevant to his situation, but very telling about his personality. It was about what he thought he deserved, what he thought other people deserved, and so on. Also I think m…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:23 PM
1

That's because the deck really isn't stacked against him at all. It's his refusal to think outside of very narrow parameters that has caused his situation. A person can get dumped out of high school, lose all their scholarships, go to college, and walk straight into a 6 figure salary if they're willing to fill the job roles.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:54 PM
1

What really got me was the hangups over the "YOLO swag smoking partying" crowd passing their SAT with the same scores despite all his extra effort. There are people in his thread offering him decent salaried jobs in service/industry sectors and he's ignoring them. Seems he thinks he needs to work an administrative desk job otherwise he's doomed to being a potwash/burger flipper. His main problem seems to be his distorted view of the world, which at 18 perhaps isn't surprising, but still. Knowing…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:50 PM
2

At least with the way my brain works, I can't stand memorizing rote facts like that. (18 gauge vs 22) I want to learn a concept, and manipulate the concept for my own benefit. This. One of the reasons why I love working with motorcycles is because you can't learn how one bike works without learning about how every bike works. Learning theory, concept, and then applying it in a practical way is what men are good at. It's what "hacking" is all about, you have a deeper understanding of something al…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:33 PM
1

What I don't get about this is how does it fix anything? Segregation doesn't help to do anything other than widening the gap and reinforcing stereotypes.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:36 PM
2

You're making perfect the enemy of good by being so harsh. This person is guilty of identifying with the wrong movement, not running over your dog.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 02:35 AM
2

"Lets go back to my room and have some fun!" "Okay, I'll just need you to sign this legal disclaimer and we can get down to business!"
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:10 AM
1

Creepshots: Because it isn't creepy if women do it.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:15 PM
0

If he wants sympathy, then I am more than happy to give him sympathy and support. I'd give the guy a hug in person and buy him a beer if I could. Men already have very few places they can go for help and support on these issues. They don't need people trying to reduce that even further.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:08 PM
2

Men can do it and they often do. My old housemate used to do it and it made me sick to my stomach, it was borderline sociopathic how he gave so few shits about the women he was screwing. We all have needs, but what separates humans from other animals is how we can think beyond our animal instincts, and instead do things for the greater good.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:09 PM
–

That's MRA paranoia. Don't fall into that trap.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:31 PM
–

It's not a "biological imperative" for women to be manipulative, lying, cheating sluts who think that casually dating multiple men behind their backs is "empowering". If I was having casual sex with someone, I'd want their consent before I go sleep with other people. I'd want them to know that I'm taking steps to be safe and not pass infections/diseases on to them. I'd also want to show them some respect by giving them the chance to decide whether they are morally okay with that. Pretty simple s…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:29 PM
1

Way back when I was dating, I used to reject the occasional girl that I wasn't interested in using exact copypastes of rejections I'd received from women previously. I'd slightly paraphrase them if they included anything gender specific. I did this mainly as a personal experiment. Their reaction to the seething hatred was usually just total confusion. It was generally something along the lines of "Hey, what's the harm in showing interest? How does that automatically make me an axe murderer? Why …
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:18 PM
–

I read the askfeminists thread and they seem to be saying that it was not sexist and therefore not as bad as if you were a woman getting her ass slapped. That's funny, I read the askfeminist thread too and saw a bunch of people agreeing that it was sexist, and the few who were saying it wasn't were being called out and/or downvoted. But I guess that doesn't jive well with the mensrights anti-feminist rhetoric, so we'll just pretend that we saw them being bigots and complain about things that hav…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:14 AM
1

Honestly in my experience, particularly with relationships, things are rarely black and white. There are women who have beat on their man horribly, to the point that they're seriously injured or at least bleeding. That is obviously extremely abusive and even in our fucked up society, the vast majority will know that it isn't okay (yes, even women who hit men often draw the line in the sand somewhere around the serious injury mark). Then there are women who have lost their temper and kicked, hit …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:44 PM
-2

You can't genderflip a situation like this. There is no social norm that says men hitting women is okay or insignificant, that idea is something that only applies to women hitting men. It's better for both people if he left. The world isn't black and white.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:35 PM
-1

It's not a feminist stance at all. I don't know the nature of their fight or exactly how violent she was. I just know how I would react to it personally, using my own line in the sand. So long as the action doesn't cross that line into the realm of totally unforgivable, then I'd be willing to rehabilitate that person. Maybe even make an activist out of them. People are fallible, sometimes they fuck up really hard, and I'm a big believer that someone somewhere has to teach them the error of their…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:55 PM
1

You admit to being a feminist, so i feel secure in believing you're an awful person. You really need to work on your issues. "Feminist" doesn't automatically mean something negative. Yes, it's fairly misguided to want "empowerment" in a first world country where women can do all the things men can do, but there are still legitimate issues such as abortion, etc. that feminism has a legit corner to fight. If someone is posting in /r/mensrights in favour of men's issues, it's probably safe to assum…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:43 PM
-5

You essentially just said it's not her fault she beat him Except to quote directly from my post: it was definitely her fault for beating you So... no, I didn't. Don't get me wrong, this woman needs to do some serious groveling if she is going to apologise, I just feel like the currently acceptable bigotry in society is the true evil. People can be convinced to do unacceptable things when everyone acts like it's normal. Also, lol at being called a "fucking psycho feminist". I'm going to go make t…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:36 PM
1

And don't say the same thing. Except I wouldn't, because the issue that I'm talking about isn't that she hit him (not that it was okay), the issue is that everyone thought it was okay. If the gender roles were reversed there would be no such social convention.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:25 PM
–

I'm sorry this has happened to you OP. Welcome to the very dangerous worldview where women can do no wrong. Unlike everyone else in this thread, I would advise you to talk it out with your girlfriend. Everyone else is going to jump on the bandwagon and tell you to dump her ass and press charges, but the reality is that she is a victim of the "women do no wrong" mentality as well as you, because while you were at the receiving end of the beating, she was doing it because social norms told her tha…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:03 AM
1

Yes but more than likely they were told that the identity of the girl was being kept secret, so publishing the age would be a no-no. Hence "under sixteen" to emphasize that zomg she can't even legally have the sex0rz!
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:41 PM
2

The age of consent in the UK is 16, so everyone is pretty hung up about this magical age before which nothing sexual is ever supposed to occur.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:36 PM
1

And the best part is, in most restaurants so long as you pay your half of the bill (ie what you ate), you get to leave! So you could just walk out on sulky bitch who left her purse at home because she had no intention of paying.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 04:02 AM
3

Breaking news: 1 in 3 statistics will be utter bullshit!
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:35 AM
3

I agree with this, it seems like a shame that he settled out of court - usually settlements only occur when the case is a dead cert loss, not worth lawyers fighting for. That means that there was a really good chance he would've won and set a landmark ruling.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:45 AM
–

I did, she came back at me with a throwaway "bitches be cray" type comment. Wouldn't surprise me at all if she hadn't given much thought to what she was doing, and was just merely going along with the crowd.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 05:08 AM
–

Reminds me of a girl I work with who is a self proclaimed "feminist". She tells me how the women shouldn't have to do any of the heavy jobs in the store, then she tells me how she likes to go on feminist marches and finds it "so empowering". When I ask her why she doesn't find it just as empowering that the company expects her to do the same jobs as the men, she tells me that's not what the feminist marches are about. When I ask her what they're about, she tells me "it's about standing up agains…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 04:50 AM
7

Not necessarily. I think if a pretty white woman walks through a downtrodden black neighbourhood, wearing attractive clothes while someone films her, it's not very surprising that she'd get cat called because she stands out so much. I'd be more shocked if she walked through a black/minority neighbourhood and nobody said anything. If she was to walk through a wealthy white gated community she'd probably get a "hello" or a "you look all dressed up, where's the party?". And lets not overlook the fa…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 08:11 PM
1

I think to a certain extent, the victim complex is justified given the level at which men are brushed aside in our society. There is a disconnect between reality and social perception that has put men firmly in the "you must suffer for your privilege" category, despite those privileges not really existing. I get what you're saying though, sometimes it's just butthurt. I'd encourage you to come back and join us though. The more moderates and right-thinkers we have on board, the more we drown out …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:09 PM
1

It's what amounts to our opponents using ad hominems as a means to dodge some of the issues we raise here. I'm well aware that MensRights is a good sub. I think it's only right to expect and allow a certain amount of anger toward women in general here - men have nowhere to vent their frustration and some of the shit people do to men is very frustrating and angering indeed. But there comes a time when you have to just remind people that they're making the rest of us look bad. It's reassuring to k…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:05 PM
–

I think that we need to draw distinction here between pointing out blatant misogyny and concern trolling. I've been called a "concern troll" here before for calling someone on their woman hate. We can't use concern trolling as an excuse to stop giving a shit about how we come across. I don't know about the rest of you, but I'd like to be taken seriously rather than being branded a woman hating anti-feminist chauvanist pig. I think this is what /u/nicemod is referring to when he says: So if a reg…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:32 PM
3

Also their divorced husbands aren't suing them for a share of their millions either, it would appear.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:27 PM
3

"In school, boys are screwed over time and again. Schools are engineered for women. In the US, they force-feed boys Ritalin like Skittles to shut them up. And while girls are favoured to fulfil quotas, men are slipping into distant second place." "Nobody in my generation believes they're going to get a meaningful retirement. We have a third or a quarter of the wealth previous generations had, and everyone's fleeing to higher education to stave off unemployment and poverty because there are no jo…
/r/MensRights05/12/14 06:46 AM
1

When men hang out together and ban women, that's discrimination and oppression of women. When women hang out together and ban men, that's "safe" and healthy.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 02:26 AM
1

Clarkson is an insufferable, insensitive, bigoted, closed minded asshole. Standing next to Piers Morgan however, it's pretty easy to see that for all of Clarkson's faults, at least what he's done has mostly been constructive in that it made a large amount of people laugh and kept them entertained.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 12:35 AM
1

This is a good example of the media attempting to set the bar of what's an acceptable level of abuse for men to put up with before they have a "legitimate grievance". They've set that bar absurdly high at requiring medical attention - so high in fact, that it becomes another crime altogether, which is felony battery, or arguably, aggravated battery. So you have to be the victim of a third degree felony before calling the cops becomes an acceptable thing for a man to do, in their eyes. Their angl…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 08:11 AM
2

I'm not tone policing you. You were tone policing him. Rather than acknowledging the fact that he supports this issue, you decided that it was more important that he doesn't support any of the other issues presented on this sub but not in this thread. What I'm saying to you is, this could've been a gateway for him into understanding the other issues. Instead you reinforced the negativity and basically acted like he wasn't worthy because he's not on the bandwagon.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:51 PM
2

Honestly, I suspect that you're just being disingenuous, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Your words spoke for themselves, whether you meant it or not. They were not the words of someone who wanted to educated a misguided person, they were just scornful. You need to work on how you come across if that wasn't your intent.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:16 PM
1

Because you said "let's downvote you anyway". It was like you were saying "you aren't fully complying with the hivemind, so downvotes!". You weren't interested in converting him, your aim was to make him feel bad for daring to disagree. Probably why he feels like that is because every time he points out something that doesn't mesh with him he gets treated like that.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:58 PM
1

Being confrontational isn't going to make him like us more. The only part of this he will remember is being downvoted for agreeing with us. I don't agree with him about this being the only issue that MensRights gets right, but it's his honest opinion and we shouldn't be taking that as some kind of insult. We're here to educate, not turn people away because they don't already agree with us. Also this sub is far from perfect. There are a few here who take things way too far, there are a few misogy…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:18 PM
0

That was pretty much my initial thought.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:47 PM
2

THIS! Who is talking about domestic violence toward men? Nobody! The only voice is for women. They have set up a perfect stage on which to make men sound like evil horrible creatures, and they're gleefully dancing around on it. Meanwhile men are trying to raise awareness for the very real issue of the attitude toward abused men in society and the legal system. These fucking trolls are drowning us out and shooting us down, everyone buys it because they've brainwashed everyone into thinking that i…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:43 PM
0

Making good the enemy of perfect, as per usual.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:31 PM
6

This. Only with a consenting adult or medical complications. There is no acceptable excuse to mutilate genitals, not even religion.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:31 PM
1

Also I forgot to mention, but probably the most important piece of advice: Never, under any circumstances, talk to police. The "I'm a reasonable guy, this is just a silly situation, the officer will understand" reasoning almost never works. What you say can be used against you, but it can never be used for you. There is no situation where opening your mouth will benefit you except to say "Yes" when they ask you if you understand your rights. You are more likely to hang yourself with your own wor…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:12 AM
2

I've worked in retail for years, so I'm very aware of theft vs robbery. Thieves rarely take something if they think you can see them, and if they've been spotted they'll try to run/escape. "Presence" doesn't mean "in the same building", it means right in front of you. The shoplifter situation becomes a robbery at the point that they threaten you with violence if you try to stop them.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:03 PM
16

Provided that a man would get a very similar punishment for doing the same thing to a woman in Finland if he confessed as well, I'm very happy with the result of this. She had the decency to, after sobering up to the reality that she'd done wrong, come clean and accept the consequences. That's very admirable. Given that she confessed, acknowledged and accepted her wrongdoing, and expressed remorse, I believe that a fine is acceptable. There's no point further punishing someone who already knows …
/r/MensRights22/11/14 06:57 PM
1

It's very rare for people to attempt to brazenly take something in plain sight of another person without using some kind of threatening language or behaviour, but in that event you'd be right.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 06:45 PM
5

My legal advice to you, is to bide your time, but try to stay in contact with your kids over the phone or by post, unless you are told to stop. If you are told to stop, make a note of this, record it if possible, and alert the relevant authorities to let them know that you have been told to cease contact with your children, and declare your intention to abide by the wishes of their mother. DO NOT: Lose your temper. Visit the property unless invited. Record any invitation, and make sure you get a…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:20 AM
–

*Robbery survivor. Theft is when something is taken in your absence. Robbery is when something is taken in your presence. Also unless you store your money in your ass, and your mugger used his penis to retrieve it, you probably had a slightly less jarring ordeal than someone who was violently raped. But that's just comparing scars. It sucks that anyone is a victim of crime, but I don't think anyone ever "got off lightly" from raping a woman in the UK or US. I'm not sure why they feel the need to…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 03:21 AM
1

I know but sometimes I like to know where I stand when I think I'm among like minded individuals. I wasn't expecting the hivemind to be so bipolar.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:04 AM
1

And yet I've had people on this sub downvote me and tell me that we should tar all feminists with the same brush just because a few prominent ones are assholes... that we should define feminism by the objectives and misandrous bile of it's most negative, destructive, repulsive proponents.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:07 AM
–

This sub confuses me sometimes. I made the exact same argument a few days ago that not all feminists are bad. I got downvoted to oblivion. Now here is someone basically saying the same thing being upvoted.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:03 AM
4

I hope the rest of the world realizes that feminism is nothing more than has been turned into a philosophy that belittles men in all aspects of life. What I've learned is that feminism is something that began and continued with noble intentions, and then got hijacked by people who wanted to use it to their benefit. They saw generosity and compassion as a weakness to be exploited, and abused a movement that in the past had achieved some great things.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:47 AM
0

You're suggesting that it's incorrect to be critical of "feminism" despite the majority of people using that label being bigoted and hateful And you're suggesting that the majority of people using that label are bigoted and hateful. Based on what evidence? Which survey? Yes, that is all it would take. If a significant number of prominent bigots started calling themselves MRA's and they weren't sufficiently denounced by other prominent members, the movement would be derailed and in a short time c…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 08:40 AM
–

I get the impression you're just calling my argument a fallacy because it's an easy way to avoid critical thinking that might not fit within your world view. This is called cognitive dissonance. A feminist is not defined simply by whether or not they meet the dictionary definition of "feminism". That is not how we define political movements. Yes it is how we define movements. A movement must have a clear objective. Without that, what you have is just a bunch of people ranting about whatever they…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 08:18 AM
–

How is producing intentionally biased research and abusing institutional power while being a prominent voice in the feminist movement different from not really doing anything and being associated with people like Elliot Rodgers, who never took part in the MRM or even so much as commented on r/mensrights? That's not even the question I asked. I'm not asking you to compare the bad things people have done in the name of feminism against the bad things people have done in the name of MRM. I'm asking…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:59 AM
7

I completely agree with you. Recently a male friend had a female friend of his completely stop talking to him because he asked her if she was interested in him, and told her that he'd always thought she was quite attractive. He also said NBD if she's not, and that he was just curious. I just can't fathom it. Why recoil in disgust and treat the guy like he's a plague bearing rapist just because he showed an interest?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:51 AM
–

The MRM has lots of bad press, but much of it is trumped up or intentionally taken out of context. And yet you say: Feminism doesn't just get bad press (it of course does happen). Feminist scholars produce insane hateful nonsense and peddle unsubstantiated social theories. They produce intentionally biased research to support their position. How is this different? How are the people giving the MRM a bad name different from the people giving the feminist movement a bad name? I put it to you that …
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:32 AM
–

So Mens Rights should be defined by everyone using that banner too, right? So by your logic, we're all red pill right wing misogynist nutjobs. Or does it stop being convenient when you're the one on the receiving end of negative stereotypes? If the feminist movement itself is self described as being for equality and the support of women's issues, but we label them based on the behaviour of those who do abhorrent things under the "feminist" banner, then we might as well start doing the same thing…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 05:15 AM
–

I'm so tired of this bullshit on this sub. Wikipedia defines feminism as a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. Emphasis mine. So feminism is about establishing gender equality for women. Now that we've established that, let's look at the points in this article: When men who respect women a…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:03 AM
3

How do you get people to agree to something negative? Present it as a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:31 AM
1

So is picking your nose. So is anything. You could literally put any action in place of the word "rape" there. Now you're just being obtuse. Stop trying to side-step. I'm saying that your statement was stupid. No you aren't. You're making a straw man argument by taking me out of context. All you've done is bought yourself some time by attempting to side-step points. I already did. back to you again. No you didn't, so far you've provided zero sources to back up what you're saying. You also haven'…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:21 AM
1

It can be violent or non-violent so in general, no, rape is not violent. Rape where the victim is being physically overpowered and then violated while they're fully conscious is a violent act, and that was specifically the type of rape I was talking about. I have no idea why you chose to take me so out of context. As I just told you women appear to rape men at more or less similar rate to men raping women. If you have some different view you better back it up. How about you back it up? Where are…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:27 AM
1

Where does it exist then? I've never been taught that and have never encountered it. The closest thing I've come to was the PUA movement, which was more sad and pathetic than anything else. Like a computer nerd desperately scrabbling to find the cheat code for getting sex with women.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:01 PM
1

Right, this is what they call rape culture. Misinformation about rape and male sexuality. I think you misunderstand. I'm not saying that the concept doesn't exist among radical feminists and misandrists, I'm saying that in reality there is no rape culture. The thing that they're saying exists, doesn't exist in reality, only in their minds to justify their cause.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:49 PM
1

It exists among a fringe of redpillers and chauvinists/misogynists, sure. Not what I'd call a "rape culture" though. These people are objectifying assholes, but calling them rapists, or likely potential rapists, or rape apologists, or whatever is a bit of a stretch. Their lack of respect for the opposite sex is not an indicator for a desire to rape. This idea that the male sex drive is something that can build and build, eventually turning a man into an animalistic rapist, somewhat akin to the i…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:32 PM
1

You mean "rape of women". No, I mean rape, period. Maybe I just have a good group of friends, but I've never directly encountered the attitude. Actually a lot of governments define rape to be a man raping a woman. For the most part the other forms of rape probably get counted as some sort of lesser offense so you might be right about them being illegal, although in practise I think it's clear that rape of men by women is almost never charged in the USA for example, and various parts of the gover…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:14 PM
1

I think you may be confusing society with culture. People committing crimes is a social issue. People having the wrong attitude is a cultural issue.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:58 PM
1

That culture doesn't exist. It's a straw man argument.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:58 PM
2

Its the claim that people are taught that male sexuality is inherently predatory and female is inherently like a gate that must be got around. I've met a few men who objectified women, and who generally speaking, wanted to dispense with the "bullshit" and just get straight to the sex. I find these people often have difficulty with social interaction, relationships, and understanding other people. They're often pretty insecure, and kinda repulsive to be around. I wouldn't call them rapist materia…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:51 PM
1

It is in the UK.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:37 PM
1

The proof is in the numbers. No, it's not. The numbers are useful, but they don't offer proof of anything without further investigation. Correlation is not causation. Not that you seem to care, since accuracy only seems to be important to you up until it stops confirming your prejudices, and then the cognitive dissonance sets in. Point is, I don't care about what you want to believe. The truth is often inconvenient, but that's all that I'm really interested in. You're not going to convince me of…
/r/PussyPass06/11/14 12:30 AM
1

The issue is how women are treated, since they are clearly the minority and fill few leadership roles. Being a majority or in a leadership role does not make men the cause. How women treat men is really a non-issue, insofar as rules and regulations are written for all soldiers and any penalties for breaking them is non-gender specific. This logic is fucking retarded, allow me to demonstrate why: How men treat women is really a non-issue, insofar as rules and regulations are written for all soldi…
/r/PussyPass05/11/14 04:59 AM
1

Men not being able to treat women equally That is a normative statement with some pretty clear gender bias.
/r/PussyPass05/11/14 12:45 AM
2

This is why I think a gender segregated army would be a good idea.
/r/PussyPass03/11/14 04:01 PM
18

I just can't believe it honestly. She posted pictures of herself to show everyone that she's an attractive white girl! I mean come on! How much more fucking transparent can you get?
/r/PussyPass03/11/14 04:03 AM
5

FWIW, the same thing seems to have been happening in /r/pussypassdenied. The aim seems to be to flood the sub with posts about women receiving beatdowns, with the intended end result being to equate MRAs with women beaters.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:25 AM
1

Was walking to work the other day, attractive girl gave me a flirtatious look and a smile. In work same day, another attractive girl kept smiling at me. Two days later a colleague tells me that I'm very attractive. I gotta be honest reddit, I'm not sure I can take much more of this harassment. If this goes on any longer, I might actually have to start a tumblr blog about it. Why can't they just keep it to themselves? It's almost as though they have some kind of primal urge to reproduce or someth…
/r/PussyPass01/11/14 02:58 AM
12

I had the "man flu" shit thrown at me in work the other day. Mentioned that I wasn't feeling so great. In work, told I had man flu by a colleague. So apparently even sucking it up and coming to work when you're feeling like shit is "man flu". I've been employed by this company for a year and I've yet to take a single sick day. Even when I had an ear infection so bad that it burst my eardrum, I was still coming in to work.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 11:57 PM
3

This one
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/14 03:14 AM
11

Worth it for the good posts though. That cross post from 2xC was pure gold.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/14 02:56 AM
6

What she expected in life, was for her boyfriend to be a go-getter career climber who made all his money in a traditional, cookie-cutter job so that she could become a typical housewife and have everything taken care of for her. This is basically what she means when she says she's being "pragmatic" and wants to start a family. So basically, his value as a human being is based on how she thinks he compares to the "average" man, and his ability to provide for her wants in life, and fuck all the th…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/14 01:16 AM
18

I don't see how this is women trying to use a pussy pass.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/14 12:45 AM
28

That's one thing that makes me really sad every time; hearing about a soldier who comes back home to find out that his significant other has drained his bank account. You've seen lives being taken, friends gone, made life and death decisions in the name of your country. You've gone through hell and come out the other side. The only thing that has kept you going, is knowing that when you come back you'll have enough money to maybe get the ball rolling on buying a house, or going back to school, o…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/14 02:50 AM
-4

Libertarians are largely fucking kooks and idealistic freshmen anyway.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 05:10 PM
313

proof I'm not a fucking gold-digger You dumped him because you didn't like how frugal he was! doesn't he want to treat her? Not when she thinks she's entitled to it!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/14 03:59 PM
3

The issue isn't cops, the issue is the culture within certain departments. The threat of serious repercussions for misconduct is absent, and this has created a force that has no respect or remorse.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:53 PM
1

Ah I see, I think that's why I got confused, the way OP worded the title made it sound like the trial had been and gone. In that case then yes it is rather strange that she'd be released on bail if the charge is murder. I would hope that it's because her lawyer made a pretty strong case that she isn't a threat...
/r/PussyPass10/10/14 12:11 AM
-2

Because I find it difficult to believe that a jury sworn under oath could be convinced that abuse took place without substantial evidence. I don't think this is a situation where a pussy pass was used to argue diminished responsibility.
/r/PussyPass09/10/14 06:18 AM
3

If it went to trial and the lawyer was able to make a convincing enough argument while the prosecution had nothing substantial to rebut it with, I'm inclined to think that there might've been some truth to this. The jury can't just decide based on a totally one sided set of witness statements. However, even diminished responsibility would come with some kind of sentence, such as involuntary manslaughter. You don't just walk free from killing someone if it's already been proven that you were hold…
/r/PussyPass09/10/14 12:46 AM
42

it's still men that commit the vast majority of rapes No. Rapists commit rapes. Men are a gender, not a genre of criminal.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:04 AM
2

Awesome, thanks for that clarification.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:12 AM
1

My source link was for the wikipedia article, and it doesn't say anywhere that this rule does not apply to private citizens, it just says: "...holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law." It doesn't state who that evidence would be collected by, but it does say that not all evidence will be barred by the exclusionary rule. I would think the court would view the false allega…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 12:46 AM
2

Do you have a source for that?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 11:27 PM
8

Evidence gathered illegally is sometimes inadmissable due to the exclusionary rule in the constitution. "Even in a criminal case, the exclusionary rule does not simply bar the introduction of all evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment." Source.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:17 PM
1

Are you really going to show that you STILL dont have any idea what the opinion of the writer/website is? It's irrelevant to the point. If I'm inadvertently agreeing with a website, why give so much of a shit except to stir an argument? You can't justify your actions by claiming to be acting in the best interests of the website. You in fact cannot justify yourself at all. You did what you did to make a scene because that's the type of character you are. That's far more reprehensible than someone…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:44 PM
1

Lol seriously? Just because I'm not willing to read this fucking gigantic TLDR wall of text doesn't mean I can't legit find the notion of women superior to men offensive, nor does the fact that the article does not immediately announce it's intent change that fact, and it does not absolve you of having made assumptions yourself. I skimmed it because it was a poorly formatted piece of shit. You made assumptions because you're frankly a bit of a troll. The only ironic thing is this ridiculous ques…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:13 PM
1

I'm criticising the attitude. If the article is against it the hooray for the article. Jesus christ.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:39 PM
2

You were predicting a couple subjects. Seems to me like that's basically just jumping to conclusions and making assumptions about someone you know nothing about. Where are they saying women shouldnt be treated equally? In the bit where they're saying that men need to be tamed, that men are boorish thugs, that women are morally superior, that men should be gallant. Did you even read the article? Even if the article writer themselves was not saying these things, then there are still people being q…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:02 PM
0

Don't tell me, you're going to talk about voting rights, or maybe that we dont pay women as much as men. I don't have to prove anything to you to earn my right to speak here or demonstrate my "worthyness" of the mens rights cause. Go stir up some other beehive.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:33 PM
2

LOL at the article citing "morally superior women" as having some kind of god given responsibility to tame "boorish" men. One male contributor asks "what reason do men have to be gallant anymore?" as if that's an attractive or virtuous behaviour that has been lost. I'm not sure if this article isn't just pointing out feelgood backlash "tit for tat" against the way women have been treated as inferior to men in the past. Inequality, regardless of which gender is oppressed, is bad. I don't get why …
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter