| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Is it time to punish false accusers?Yes. Next question. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/18 05:45 PM |
| 72 | 'Every district attorney’s nightmare': Two men exonerated in 1991 rape claimYes, the DA who got hoodwinked is the victim here. Not the two men who had their lived and reputations stolen from them. No, we should feel bad for the DA who didn't bother investigating properly before going home to his family every night for the past decades while two innocent men bore the brunt of his short-sighted zeal. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/18 03:30 PM |
| 1 | Smallville Actress Allison Mack facing 15 years for child sex traffickingYes, but the story doesn't explain how children are alleged to be victims. It may be in the indictment, but it's not explained in the story. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/18 10:21 AM |
| 1 | Engineering schools is "open to taking on female applicants without the usual mathematics qualifications" | This is how you get collapsing bridges.No i didn't read your edit, it probably happened after I posted this. It took me a while to find it - and it's absolutely wrong. First: That's not a slippery slope argument, it's an observed cycle. Second: Degree requirements are absolutely up to the individual universities Third: Even if each Uni is mandated to require a certain course - they still determine GRADING requirements. Spelled out: Agnes is a student admitted to an engineering college even though she can't meet the requirements. When… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/18 02:51 PM |
| 1 | Engineering schools is "open to taking on female applicants without the usual mathematics qualifications" | This is how you get collapsing bridges.My point was not meant to attack the curve in general. My prediction: In two years, when the cohort of women admitted without the normal strict requirements will hit the core course material, and struggle HARD. Why? Because the requirements are there for a reason. As a result, these ladies begin to drop out of these quantitative fields en mass. This makes the colleges numbers look bad, because they have either more women dropouts, or more women failing classes, or just fewer female engineering g… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/18 02:41 PM |
| 1 | Engineering schools is "open to taking on female applicants without the usual mathematics qualifications" | This is how you get collapsing bridges.Dude, no need to go on the attack. The cycle I was referring to is not a "slippery slope" - it's been observed before: Group X is underrepresented in this role! it must be because of InstitutionalBigotry(tm) We need to relax our standard for group X, so they are better represented. We are here in the current example Group X is under-performing, they are falling behind! It must be because of InstitutionalBigotry(tm) and absolutely not because we let in people who were less qualified than their pe… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/18 02:32 PM |
| 17 | Engineering schools is "open to taking on female applicants without the usual mathematics qualifications" | This is how you get collapsing bridges.Yeah, because the school wants to have a higher dropout rate, especially for minority students..... Wait two years and you'll have stories for professors being pressured to "curve up" the underperforming students who should not have qualified to attend in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 12:51 PM |
| 5 | Engineering schools is "open to taking on female applicants without the usual mathematics qualifications" | This is how you get collapsing bridges.The degree is a great signal of quality, until you relax your standards in order to meet a quota. Rolex might be a great signal of quality, but if they announced easier quality tests on all silver watches in order to meet shipping targets, you might begin to prejudge watches of that material as less likely to be the best. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 12:49 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter