TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zosimasie Archive

View 1 post and 834 comments by Zosimasie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Why do paleontologists keep writing about million year old bones? gosh, stop posting old stuff. That bone is like, a million years old. Show me something from today.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:16 PM
24

Don't teach white people to put bars on their windows, Teach black people not to break into white peoples' homes. Yes, white people can steal. No, not all black people. Does that seem acceptable to you? Is that "getting a message through"?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:16 PM
6

http://i.imgur.com/dhMeAzK.gif
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:18 AM
5

Not all men are Dracula's son.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:16 AM
1

No. No it did not. If anything, they should have made it a default to show their support for free speech. This is the real world. It doesn't care if you're offended by it. Put on your big girl panties and deal with life.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:16 AM
3

Nationalized male citizens between certain ages can lose citizenship if they don't sign up for SS. So, there's that, as well.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:08 AM
3

The only joke here are people okay with mutilating the genitals of infants.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:00 PM
-3

I know how you feel. My parents cut off my left foot when I was a baby. And I'm also very glad I have a body part cut off from me.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:38 PM
34

They should just reword that 'rule' to read "Mods will delete whatever the fuck we want for whatever fucking reason we want because 'fuck you'." Would make it a lot more clear and reflecting of how it is used.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 01:12 AM
3

But they wouldn't be banned. They'd be shown the door with facts and data and downvotes.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:57 PM
1

Nearly double the amount of push-ups required. They reflect this difference in the pay for men and women, too, right? Because paying men more would be the only fair response to men having higher requirements.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 08:32 PM
1

Also, I'm pretty sure most people don't give verbal, enthusiastic and on-going consent to the searches. So, technically, they rape people by the thousands.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:15 AM
6

RAINN is not a government agency. You can't even do the most basic of basic of researching. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 01:29 AM
4

Just casual sexism that society encourages. All you can do is call out the sexist assholes on their sexism.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 12:53 PM
1

The Dogs of War.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:17 PM
-1

Fuck of with your concern trolling.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:21 PM
18

We're supposed to be fighting that bullshit, not giving in to it.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:04 PM
1

Why isn't this specific issue a mens rights issue? It's because the issue isn't because they are men, it's because they are gay. Seriously, how are you people this retarded to not get this?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 05:31 AM
2

Just because the person with some issue is a man does not mean his issue is a men's rights issue. What are you having trouble understanding here?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 05:24 AM
-1

Nice strawman, bro. Maybe next time you could respond to what I actually said.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 04:55 AM
-3

That they are men does not make it a men's rights issue. Men are also affected by guns rights issues, but that men are affected by that does not make it a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:38 AM
-8

Again, gay issues aren't men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:55 PM
11

Women should be paid 76¢ on men's dollar. Be a lady. It's not an equality issue, I consider it a manners issue.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:57 AM
13

I went to r/feminism and said how i support equal rights Well there's yer problem.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:53 AM
5

while they have been adding women to positions of power and influence, they still have males making up the entirety of the "disposable" roles. Well, duh. Women are only allowed to be CEO's, and men are only allowed to be garbage collectors.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:51 AM
1

Shoo troll, don't bother me.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:12 PM
0

You seem to not remember very much. How can you be sure it's not a false memory like the 80's cases? And if you knew anything about the unreliability of memory, you'd understand that every time you remember it, especially if you try to remember it, your mind is basically rewriting those memories, making them even more unreliable.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:47 AM
-1

Wait, what? Are you saying I'm a feminist? HAhahahaha! That's a good one. And thinking that wishing to distinguish between statutory rape and rape is "downplaying" anything? Man, you re functionally retarded.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:23 AM
-11

An 11 year old is not going to be able to give consent Yeah, that's what the 'statutory' part means. Include it as it has meaning.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:20 PM
-16

Not all 11 year olds are clueless toddlers. The 'statutory' part has meaning, use it.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:51 PM
-28

Did she rape them, or did she statutorily rape them? There's a difference. Stop blurring the lines.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:27 PM
-4

Gay people issues aren't men's rights issues. "But gay men are men, too. You should care about gay men's issues." And NAMBLA men are men, too. Just being a group of men does not make it a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:10 AM
11

But then they'd have to count as two for HOV/carpool lanes, for consistency, which is not currently the case.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:20 AM
-1

I would. But I love watching people get butthurt and offended.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:58 AM
2

Please stop leaving the 'statutory' part off from 'statutory rape'. It's there for a reason.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:03 PM
24

blame one no tall?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:24 AM
3

You're forgetting that to these people 'diversity' means 'not white, not male'.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:23 AM
4

Can anyone name a movie that passes that test? I'm having trouble thinking of any that pass 2 and 4. Most tasks are done to 'save the day' for the city/country/family/etc., and most buddy movies usually portray at least one of them as bumbling buffoons. Maybe Back to the Future, as they're mostly just trying to get Marty back to his present.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:36 AM
23

Call them up and ask them if they do female babies, too.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:09 PM
2

If it's the state legislature passing a bill, the constitution fully applies.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:05 AM
2

I think you have way too many k's after numbers in there.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:22 AM
4

Women should be forced to get abortions. I wonder if she'd be okay with that.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:24 PM
3

"36 presents!?!? Last year there were 37!!"
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:27 AM
3

What "two other sources"? You only posted two links, and I addressed both. I already explained everything that needs to be said about them. I already explained why psychiatric academic papers are better sources about psychiatric disorders than a layman's dictionary. Like I said, I am done with you. You are either completely fucking retarded, or a completely fucking retarded troll.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:05 PM
4

You never posted a source in response to me. I had to read some other comment branch to see it. It's a fucking dictionary website. That shit is not sufficient when talking about medical terminology. They only give a short layman's explanation and do not adequately explain the term. Further, someone already pointed out where, even if we use that specific definition, it does not mean that a pedophile is a fucker of children. "...in which an adult has sexual fantasies about or engages in sexual act…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:09 PM
8

The fuck are you talking about? What source did I ignore? You sure as shit didn't provide one. You just asserted. How is a proper psychiatry paper, technically discussing the subject, not a sufficient sourse? I actually did my research, unlike you, clearly, and every psychiatry source I could find that discussed the subject in proper terms, not just laymen's terms, supported the definition I copy-pasted, which was from a technical paper in the field of study.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:34 AM
9

You are wrong. Plain and simple. Take your own advice and learn before you speak. http://www.jaapl.org/content/39/2/242.full.pdf According to DSM-IV-TR, for a diagnosis of pedophilia, there must be both a qualitative difference in sexual makeup (i.e., sexualized urges directed toward children) and a quantitative difference (i.e., the sexualized urges must be intense).
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:27 AM
8

It means someone with an attraction to pre-pubescent children. It doesn't mean they have, do, or will fuck children.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:53 AM
5

But phile doesn't mean sex.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:22 AM
5

Nooo. That's ignorant. They're just ignorant.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:21 AM
-3

Gotta love the hypocritical white knights of /mensrights. "Someone should stomp his face into the pavement." Top comment. All the upvotes. "Someone should hit her." Downvoted. Stay white knightey, /mensrights.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:51 PM
-3

Have you ever considered that calling out an asshole who abuses their power is a righteous thing to do?
/r/MensRights25/04/15 01:01 AM
-5

We got a professional deflector here. You admit to taking part in banning someone as a personal vendetta, then all you do is deflect and ad hom the person calling you an asshole for doing that. GG. You're just proving that you're an asshole.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:53 PM
-3

So, calling out an asshole abusing their miniscule power to ban people for bullshit makes me the dick? Riiight.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:31 PM
-4

Go fuck yourself, cunt. If you can't hold yourself from abusing what little power you have as a mod, you shouldn't be a fucking mod. Calling an asshole mod an asshole is not a bannable offense in any half-way decent universe. If you ban someone for calling you an asshole, you're a piece of shit asshole, and should be banned from the site for abuse of power. Seriously, fuck you.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:18 PM
-1

Welcome to /mensrights, where women calling men rapists is misogyny. GTFO of here with your misogyny bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:22 PM
2

I'm reminded of a saying that people love to shriek "racist!" over: "Diversity is code for anti-white." These "diversity" idiots are only making that statement more and more true with each get together.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:51 AM
3

dusts off hands Problem solved. No more rape ever again. Who'da thought that all feminists had to do was teach men not to rape, and now there's no more rape ever. Well done, feminists! You totally got that issue settled.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:51 AM
5

We call it congress. Herp-a-derp! /s
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:29 AM
3

Just ask: What have feminists done in the last 20 years that was actually for equality? the answer: nothing
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:03 AM
4

Women are so quick to pull out anything they can find to show women are better than men at some thing, but don't you fucking dare suggest that men might be better than women at some other thing, you sexist misogynist socially awkward learning disability neckbeard!
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:39 AM
8

And that's why the pussy pass works. Because white knights allow it to.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 10:47 AM
2

Just get a phone app that auto-records all phone calls. Start the call with "I record all phone calls" and then quickly start the conversation. You informed them that you're recording, and them choosing to stay on the call is implicit consent to be recorded. If they say "don't record this", just say "no, what do you want" to continue the conversation.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:08 PM
4

Regarding the draft, she says this... how likely that one could happen again? I've asked this before and many people seem to be of the impression that a draft would be unlikely to happen again. I bring this up because I think this would make a stronger point in class if I could say that the draft isn't just a policy continued for the sake of continuing it. I want to be able to say that it is something that could actually happen again. Anyone else have seriously major issues with that kind of bul…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:24 AM
-3

No I wouldn't. And I certainly wouldn't call it sexual assault. Then again, I'm not a white knight douche.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:17 AM
4

Work together for what? Name one, solid, real issue that women face in the USofA simply because they are women, that feminism actually tries to do something about.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:59 AM
-8

Lips are not sex organs. It is not sexual assault to touch something that is not a sex organ.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:40 AM
-19

No. A kiss is not sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:22 AM
-1

Not everyone who pedestalizes and gives preferential treatment to women is a feminist, dumbass. In fact, most aren't.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:12 PM
1

Blackout drunk is rape. The fuck it is! Just because a person doesn't remember the night doesn't mean they didn't choose to do the stuff they did.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:47 PM
0

You're right. Us just rolling our eyes at their stupidity does so much more than attempting to make a real change. Get this man a seat at the table, he's got all the good ideas on how to help the cause.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:07 AM
-1

So, by pointing out that all he's doing is posting rage bait, I myself and just posting rage bait? Damn, you guys are idiots.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:05 AM
-7

Good job taking a potential action opportunity and turning it into just rage bait.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:36 AM
17

If the statistics support the fact that men are, on average, more likely to be involved in a car accident, is that not fair that men are charged more? No. It isn't. Why should I get charged more for something other men have done just because I have dangly bits? That's discrimination.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 06:22 PM
2

It's not about wanting to go to this specific gym. It's not that they want to give them their money and they just want the gym to not be a jerk about it. It's about fighting back against this kind of bullshit. It's about stopping it from becoming the norm. It's about setting the precedence that this is not an okay thing to do. It's about not allowing this to set a precedence that others will follow along with.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:46 PM
7

Kind of reminds me of hard-line christians who say if it weren't for the bible and believing in god and hell, that they would be out committing all sorts of crimes because they don't have that fear of damnation hanging over their heads.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:19 PM
0

The majority of those 15 in the last 39 years were for witchcraft? Really? Or are you referring to a long, long time ago, "in US history" before there was even a US-of-A? It doesn't seem like it makes much sense to say someone was executed in a place that didn't even exist yet.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:31 AM
1

Should we call to ban chick flicks? Yes. But then again, I've been saying that for a decade or more.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:28 AM
4

So, should rape be legal for Brad Pitt? Because "What woman would not jump on that candy?"
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:59 AM
4

Really? I was thinking "disbar".
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:57 AM
3

Shouldn't the title be "No Rape on Campus"?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:58 AM
21

In 100% of single-mom households, the woman is the primary breadwinner. Also not necessarily. The woman could be 100% financed by alimony and/or child support, and she would not be the primary bread winner, technically.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:13 PM
23

This is the equality that women want. Take note, everyone.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:20 PM
2

Only for two-party states. There are lots of one-party states, more than two-party, I think.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 08:40 PM
-1

Chris Rock - Black people vs. Niggas
/r/MensRights28/03/15 05:48 AM
2

For some reason I don't think they'll be around in a few centuries to bitch about much of anything.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 06:28 AM
-3

You can't have something be more bad than another thing, and have them be equally wrong. That's not how those words work.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:38 PM
-7

You find it equally bad that women be presumed gold diggers as it would be to presume men are rapists? Wow...
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:48 PM
-9

Are you fucking retarded? I said that if you can't see what's wrong with the original situation, and you have to have it framed in a way that makes it bad for women to see something wrong, you're part of the problem. Explain to me what the fuck you were thinking when you posted that bullshit you just posted. Because your faculties clearly aren't all there.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:22 AM
-6

I view the original as more fucked up than your re-envisioning.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:04 AM
-11

If you had to reverse it to see what's wrong with it, you're part of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:42 AM
4

Go to it. When they kick you out, sue them for Title IX infringement.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:52 AM
2

I'll be looking forward to it.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:36 PM
1

Still waiting on that 30% janitorial staff law... any day now
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:26 PM
1

I'm at fault? What is the thing for which I am at fault? What is the consequence that I caused to happen? I'm the only one here actually making any coherent sentences, let alone overall points. What is it that you suggest I educate myself in? Everyone here is well aware of the current situation men find themselves in. The understanding of this is precisely why threads like this exist, so they can have a way to discuss possible solutions.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:21 PM
1

"Literally?" "No, not literally, that's disgusting"
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:12 PM
1

Now you're just going from full-retard to batshit crazy. Go do some other activities for a couple hours, and then re-read this last post of yours. It doesn't make any fucking sense whatsoever. Love the fucking hypocrisy of you pretending to mock feminists/ism, yet you're only advocacy is "keep it in your pants, you lost all your rights about deciding to be a parent the moment you ejaculated", which is the same shit feminists say.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:08 PM
7

Didn't you hear? The tender years doctrine that women fought for all those decades ago was about patriarchy. Women fought for this thing because the patriarchy says that women should be the caregivers, and women fighting for that proves it's patriarchy because reasons.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:35 PM
0

If you weren't such a giant cunt, I wouldn't call you a one. Super simple stuff. Let's recap, shall we? It started off as you saying we shouldn't do jack shit to help address the issues for those already in some situation, and should only focus on prevention. I respond saying that's fucking retarded and doesn't do shit to help people already in said situation. You come flying off the fucking rails with your full-retard mode full of false dichotomies and a strawman no one is even suggesting. I ca…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:33 PM
1

Never heard of the two secrets to a successful marriage? 1. The wife is always right. 2. When in doubt, go back to rule #1. That saying exists for a reason, just as stereotypes don't just appear out of thin air. There is a millennia-long tradition of that kind of thinking. It is no more sexist to say that than to say men like competition.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:54 AM
1

stop acting like a god damn feminist. Hahahahahaha!!! That's fucking rich, coming from the asshole who doesn't want to give men any reproductive rights. What on earth do you God damn propose other then forcing women to go through and abortion or force them to carry to term a child they don't want.? What the fuck are you smoking? Seriously, I need to know so I can take some to understand what it's like to be so fucking retarded. No one on this sub is positing those two options as something that s…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:42 AM
5

So give men the ability to have their own version of it so that they can have equality.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:11 AM
1

There is no right or wrong answer on what to do if your car runs out of gas. Instead, we should be focusing on educating people to fill up their car more responsibly. How the fuck does ignoring the issue once it's become an issue help anyone who is in that situation? "We are going to pretend you don't exist, and instead tell other people not to get into your situation in the first place." Like, seriously!?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:57 AM
6

If the man gave up that, then so did the woman. Equality, bitch. Accept it.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:49 AM
2

you blame her for her past Da fuck? Who the fuck is responsible for her past if not her?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:18 AM
2

Ugh. Predictable reason for being against MRM; those with a lot of power are mostly men, therefore all men have more power than all women, worldwide. Anyone who uses that bullshit already told you everything you need to know about them; their ability to be rational is as non-existent as their empathy for men. No need to actually look closely at the issues, just "the cumulative power of all men is greater than the cumulative power of all women, therefore no men need any attention". So sick of tha…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:38 AM
46

On the internet, sure, but the mainstream media will never touch it.
/r/PussyPass04/03/15 07:09 PM
2

Economic Left/Right: -7.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18 I think freedoms and powers belong firstly and primarily to people as individuals. Any grouping beyond that does not have rights, they have privileges and responsibilities.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:28 AM
2

Yep, all boxes feminism ticks off happily with a sneer of smug self-satisfaction.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:29 AM
5

Yeah, it is. Gender quotas, affirmative action, women-only all-the-things, actively fighting to stop alimony and child support reform, playing the domestic violence victim, to include mandatory arrest and predominate aggressor policies. And a whole myriad of other examples.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:33 PM
-6

Gonna have to second that.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 12:49 AM
0

Why not both? Drink up, ladies! ;)
/r/MensRights16/02/15 11:01 PM
3

The fuck does any of that stuff you listed have anything to do with the 'gay' part? The operative focus is on 'men'. Adding 'gay' in there is just pandering bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 11:01 PM
0

Usually, people use "to be fair" when they're trying to be lenient about a point that might be counter to other stuff they just said, not to reinforce their own point.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:46 AM
3

So then, if we want to be all "utility and equality and shit" up in dis bitch, places that have more male than female patrons, they should have a male only bathroom, and a male or female bathroom? About single-user bathrooms... What's the fucking point of even gender segregating single-user bathrooms? If all there is in it is a toilet and a sink (and maybe a baby changing station), why do they need a gender-only bathroom?
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:43 AM
2

If you can talk and fuck, you can give consent. The only time you're too wasted is if you're fully passed out.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:29 AM
2

That's because they weren't.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:26 AM
1

Stop looking for things to be offended by. Take your concern trolling elsewhere.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:04 PM
-3

The story is just a sympathy grab. What kind of discussion of men's rights can be spawned from it? "I was raped as some undisclosed age. It warped my fragile little mind. Thoughts?" All he wants is rape-sympathy. There are other subs for that kind of shit.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:30 AM
-1

when people don't believe me I'm more inclined to believe a person has false memories from when they were 4 years old, than your story. Pretty sure that has something to do with it for others you tell it to. life was ruined by people calling her a liar A life is not ruined by being called a liar. This is some serious perpetual victim complex stuff. Others have already answered the other stuff.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:43 PM
-15

Cool story, bro.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:30 PM
96

And then make a request to have a "White's Hour" for the gym from 5-8 Monday to Friday. Call them sexist and hypocrites when they refuse.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:07 AM
3

Yeah. I really wish the mods wouldn't delete anything. It's best to have a record of who says what so people can see for themselves what's going on, and just let the downvotes auto-hide as the community sees fit.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:24 AM
3

Calling GWW a whore on /MR? Not exactly your best recruiting strategy.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:46 AM
4

Record everything! Get these fuckers arrested for threats of violence. Seriously. That shit is unacceptable and needs to be punished.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:12 AM
4

No, you're just a whore who didn't get paid. I give you sex, you give me something of monetary value. That's the definition of a whore.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:58 AM
15

It. Doesn't. Fucking. Matter. It's like debating whether cutting off an infants pinky toe or pinky finger is worse. They're both fucking wrong! And they should both be against the fucking law.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:42 AM
4

Sigh... No. What he wants is essentially what we already have now. Game shops generally don't sell GTA V to 11 year olds. If the 11 year old wants it, the parent has to buy it for them. You may as well say the government has banned porn, because it has an age restriction on selling it.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:26 AM
3

Jack Thompson doesn't want to ban any game. He just says that, just like how movies can't let kids into R-rated movies by themselves, that certain games shouldn't be sold to kids.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:59 PM
1

Fuck you, np rule.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:41 PM
16

Getting pregnant before trial/sentencing in the hopes of a lighter sentence has been a common tactic of women for centuries.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:47 PM
6

Not really. All that says is that they were prego when they went into prison, or became prego while in prison. Date going into prison is not the same date as committing the crime.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 09:07 PM
11

Don't kid yourself. You know they are wanting to make all the perpetrators the male staff.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 09:05 PM
2

I'm all about having the worst thing possible happening to her But being called a cunt is just going too far, worse than the worst thing possible. Man, you are a cunt.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:09 AM
4

They would easily find suitable mates if they lowered their standards. Guys typically have no problem marrying someone less educated or with a less paying job than them, why can't women?
/r/MensRights18/01/15 10:47 PM
14

No matter how sexist against men, people will always find a way to spin it as being sexist towards, or a negative for, women. Even this subreddit does it all the fucking time. Kinda makes me sad.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 06:32 PM
2

To be fair, Salt n Pepa are skank hoes you wouldn't want to touch with a 10-foot pole.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 08:46 AM
-5

Hey guys! I think I found the mangina accommodationist tone police. It's not misandrist, and it's not misogynist. Fuck off with your need to look for anything to be offended by.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:38 PM
2

Damn. His other recent videos are painful to watch. It's also amazing to see how upbeat he is about the whole thing. The way he laughs about his left hand being nothing but shattered bones and tendons, wow. He said he's lived in that house for 16 years. But who the fuck knows how their legal system operates in Taiwan. The police at least seemed cool and competent when he called them about his wallet. He also has a young son to consider. He's probably just being way too play-the-nice-guy about it…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 10:54 AM
0

That "Mr Right" may as well say "be a wet rag".
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:54 PM
3

Banning people from one sub for posting in a different sub is retarded, and should be against reddit's core rules.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:40 AM
3

"His body language was threatening, so I was afraid he was going to rape me."
/r/MensRights06/01/15 06:14 PM
3

OMG! I would love to see an NBA team play a WNBA team! That would be a dream come true.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 07:30 AM
8

Wtf is the message you are trying to convey with that post? That rational thinking is triggering and needs a warning? Or that trigger warnings are a defense for premeditated murder by hitman/hitwoman?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:23 PM
-1

Feminism is not "women's rights". Feminism is "women's superiority". Stop being a cunt.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:16 PM
16

Premeditated murder by hitman/hitwoman has no defense. If you have the ability and wherewithal to contact and communicate with a hitman/hitwoman, you have the ability to leave a bad situation without murdering someone.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:15 PM
2

I wonder if they let male drivers choose male passengers to "drive safe" from false accusations?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:28 AM
2

So, what you're saying is that holocaust deniers have a point?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:22 AM
2

There is nothing good about feminism, of any kind.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:16 AM
2

I see what you did there...
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:15 AM
5

So, right now, I've just had 5 drinks in the last hour. I'm tipsy, but I am still a fully responsible adult. I'm less nimble, and a little less careful in my speech. That's just what happens after 5 drinks. But guess what!? You're still responsible for yourself and your actions after 5 fucking drinks! Being tipsy is not rape. Fuck you! AaaaAaaaAAaAArrrrrgghhhghghgh!
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:38 PM
5

Men and boys are not a protected class in Canada.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:31 AM
12

"Study finds women/girls better at something than men/boys." Wooo! Girl power! "Study finds men/boys better at something than women/girls." BOOOO!! Sexism! Oppression! Women/girls are clearly better at the thing / some other thing. Am I the only one around here getting tired of seeing that kind of shit?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 08:59 AM
1

whoooooshhhh
/r/MensRights29/11/14 11:29 AM
0

Obviously you're a controlling, oppressive shitlord. Why do you hate women? For those who don't understand OP, it's in regards to this post from earlier today: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2n65bq/emotional_abuse_set_to_become_a_criminal_offence/
/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:54 AM
6

by feminist definition definitions are fluid and can change This is true. Men can't be raped. Therefore, women are raped more than men. can I still pretend it was rape? Absolutely! That's what lying was invented for. Now go out there and get all those victim sympathy points.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:22 PM
12

Actually, if you go with the feminist definition, men are still raped more, even without any prison stats. Regret sleeping with that fatty? Rape. A little tipsy? Rape. Chick stuck her finger in your butt during sex? Rape.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:11 PM
2

It's still discrimination. It shouldn't be allowed. It wouldn't fly if it were applied to race, and it shouldn't fly as applied to sex.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:30 PM
3

The ever popular "discrimination is okay, because capitalism". Yeah... fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:12 PM
-12

You tried this shit in /conspiracy. Just stop. Go away.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:17 PM
2

Women Behaving Badly
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:39 AM
1

Thank you for the attention Thank you, Patriarchy, for this precious gift
/r/MensRights07/11/14 04:03 PM
1

Being a cunt? Have a dozen downvotes.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 10:09 AM
2

Not to mention falling and making mistakes is at the core of literally every sport ever. You don't just sit at home theorycrafting and then suddenly you're good. You go out there and practice for hours and hours.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 10:08 AM
1

Ohh, christ, are they going to start trying to co-opt skateboarding now? Fuck, nothing is sacred to these assholes.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 10:05 AM
1

prevention of Anita Sarkeesian's speech through the threatening of a school shooting? One, just about anyone who has a voice in GG solidly condemned such activities. Two, people can condemn one set of people for one thing and not have to list every condemnable action ever. Three, that "threat" was looked into and found to be completely hollow, that it was in fact most likely a troll or a false flag. Ohh, shit, /u/grapeban? Why did I even bother...?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 12:07 PM
0

Wouldn't be surprised if John Oliver does a pro anti-gg hit piece. His show is even worse.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:36 AM
31

http://i.imgur.com/Id4FP9s.png As if CC would ever release the full interview on this one.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:34 AM
4

It's not a win, it's just not a lose. A win would be the 'prove innocence' crowd going away for good.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:46 PM
-1

The poster plays the pronoun game so readers have to ask who "we" are. +1 sin count. Poster implies the Men's Rights Movement is "inappropriate". +1 sin count. Poster wants to live in a pluralist society where different opinions are accepted, but doesn't think the MRM shouldn't be accepted in that society. +2 sin count.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:26 PM
11

Those new rules... Wow. Any reference to feminism/ists or the MRM at all will be auto-flagged for review? So much for open discussions with issues affecting men. Man, fuck those mods. (e: two of them also mod SRD? nuff said)
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:19 PM
23

It outright markets itself as "Great for extortion". That's like advertising knives as "great for murder". Pretty sure there's something illegal about that already. They're encouraging people to commit a crime.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:34 PM
1

Both. You have to have the seat down to put the lid down, so saying 'lid down' kind of implies the seat as well.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:06 AM
0

If it's a public bathroom, changes it as you need it, and leave it as you wish or how you used it. If it's a home bathroom, everyone puts the lid down every time. This is really the most sensible manners over the whole thing.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 03:48 AM
2

You haven't even explained what the hell you are talking about. All you've done is throw out insults, so I've responded in kind. If you want to have an actual discussion, then fucking do it. Explain what the fuck you are talking about. Explain what is douchy, explain where the women hating is. Do this, or you'll be labelled as the troll you are, and you can piss right the fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:23 AM
2

What was the bullshit, exactly? You're not even making a claim other than being a whiny cunt. All you did was the classic feminist tactic of running in and whining misogyny. Fucking classic shitty feminist trolling.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:09 PM
1

Shoo troll, don't bother me.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:05 PM
5

Feel free to explain yourself rather than just being a cunt.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:55 PM
12

Teh evil white menz taught them how to oppress their perfect womyns. But seriously, when it's your mother-in-law and sister-in-law who are the ones tossing gasoline and matches on the woman, you can't then claim some sort of systemic oppression of women by men and that feminism is the answer to smash the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:01 AM
3

A feminist not understanding personal responsibility... Color me shocked.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:06 PM
11

Sex isn't a contract, and does not fall under the same rules and guidelines as contracts. Comparing sex to contracts is retarded.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:06 PM
11

Choosing to have sex while shitfaced is not rape. I specifically said "consequences of the actions someone makes while shitfaced", not "being raped while shitfaced'. Take your strawmen elsewhere.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:44 PM
12

Why? When someone is shitfaced, they are still responsible for their actions, right? When someone is shitfaced, their judgement is impaired. One is still responsible for the decisions they make with their impaired judgement, right? Consequences of the actions someone makes while shitfaced are the responsibility of that person. Don't like the consequences of being shitfaced? Don't get shitfaced. What's wrong with any of this?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:29 PM
-11

These are stupid, regardless. Don't like the consequences of being shitfaced? Don't get shitfaced.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:56 PM
1

It's also National Stamp Collecting Month.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:22 PM
1

Let's work through this logic. Kissing can be sexual assault. That means lips are a sexual body part. To display a sexual body part in public constitutes public nudity. Therefore, everyone needs to cover their lips in public or be charged with public nudity.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:21 PM
1

You're incentivized to accuse early, and accuse often.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:37 AM
2

I know it happens. My mom was an electrician in the navy and civilian. But the stats don't lie. Women greatly prefer going after the comfy office job than anything to do with manual labor, and then cry wage gap.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:35 AM
27

Come on, girls! It's time to break that oil drillers and plumbers glass ceiling! ... Girls? .... girls....? tumble weeds roll Do you know what survey those figures are from? Would like to see more of it to see what else could be learned from it.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:13 PM
1

Logically of all cases, most of them should be indeterminable, and a minority should be false and slightly more should be true accusations Sigh... That's not how logic works. You can't apply logic to something like this. If those are the plain facts of reality, those are the plain facts of reality. You can't logic reality into existence. Now, go figure out where you left your common sense, and come back when you know how to logic.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:09 PM
2

Glorious!
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:48 AM
1

Sigh... Does your insanity know no bounds? This is going to be my last post about this, as I'm tired, and pretty over this. I brought up being raped by women as relevant to the fact that I'm far from a stereotypical feminist purely hating on men These are not mutually exclusive. You being raped does not exclude from being a sexist feminist asshole. This was a complete red herring job on your account. I then get called sexist again Again? Where did this happen multiple times? The original post yo…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:05 PM
1

should stop making derogatory statements about women (which is true) No, that's not true.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:48 PM
1

Reading comprehension's not your strong point, is it? Let's look at the two statements again. First is what you think he said. I was accused of claiming rape is something purely masculine Here's what was actually said. who believe that masculinity is toxic and rapist tendencies are codified into it. He said "rape tendencies codified into [masculinity]". You said "rape is purely masculine". You don't see a difference in these two phrases? Really? You're that retarded? One is saying that "there is…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:39 PM
1

I was accused of claiming rape is something purely masculine No such thing was ever said even remotely resembling that. I've actually been raped by two women? That has nothing to do with what was actually said. You claim to speak for men like me The fuck are you smoking? Where did I do that? I'm just calling out your bullshit. I've never claimed to speak for any men, anywhere, ever. And you dare to wonder why you're controversial? I know why I'm controversial. I call idiots on their bullshit, an…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:04 PM
2

Except I was molested by my foster sister, raped by my ex, and you are doing a great job of proving my point, by shoving words in my mouth I've never once said? The fuck does that have to do with you being a feminist sexist asshole? Fucking obvious red herring out of left field is obvious.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 07:07 AM
3

Predominant aggressor policies.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:07 AM
5

Saying men need to do more to serve the interests of women, and should be the primary ones to do that... Yeah, that is soo far from the usual feminist drivel. /s
/r/MensRights30/09/14 11:28 AM
1

Men need to abuse the fuck out of this law. The only way for the masses to give two shits is if women start getting tossed in jail over it.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 08:09 AM
-4

I only respond in such a way to the ideological sexists who would dismiss any reasoned, evidenced argument that comes their way. Having a reasonable discussion with those types is impossible. They are barely one step above trolls, and deserve to be treated no better than such.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:43 AM
-14

The fuck you say? I didn't say he was wrong because I said so. I said his post wasn't even worthy of giving two shits. It's as stupid as a post saying, "clearly we live on the moon, you can see it right there!" So pathetic that giving it a proper rebuttal only gives it an air of credibility it doesn't deserve.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:19 PM
5

What sexualization? Justin Bieber got far more sexualized by the media than she ever was. Besides, there's nothing inherently wrong with sexualizing someone. That's how humans have worked since before agriculture.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:14 PM
-18

None of his points are even worthy of a proper response, let alone a discussion.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:00 PM
7

No, actually, it wouldn't. Only to the extent as to point out the hypocrisy of society and the media.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:59 PM
-32

Hey guys, I think I found the feminist. e: looks like the butthurt feminist cunts showed up.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:43 PM
12

Here's the one I had in mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOpHZjpXVTc Found this other one looking for an example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiRQld9j34
/r/PussyPass29/09/14 10:13 PM
4

I know every time I'm at a job interview for CEO of the company and they ask me what my qualifications are I say, "I have a penis!" They always say, "welcome aboard! How does a 40% Penis Raise sound?" "Great!" Ohh, wait, no. Men are 90%+ of the work place deaths, almost 100% of the coal diggers and oil rig workers. I thought I saw a female trash collector once, but it was just a dude with long hair.
/r/PussyPass29/09/14 01:32 PM
-2

Fuck /rage. A bunch of overly offended sjw ninnies.
/r/PussyPass29/09/14 01:26 PM
15

There already are plenty of videos like that. Where a chick is wailing on a guy, with people looking on. And the instant the dude even pushes her away, a bunch of white knight douches jump in, attacking the guy, spouting "you can't hit a woman! how dare you hit a woman!"
/r/PussyPass29/09/14 01:26 PM
1

You do have the right to wear those kinds of clothes. Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 12:11 PM
5

Zero. She wasn't offered the job, the man was.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:03 AM
2

This is such a retarded non-issue. Just as the title suggests, shall they also demand exact equality and parity in all other aspects of all other sports? Why aren't they demanding equality in the discus throwing event? The discus, the object to be thrown, is a heavy lenticular disc with a weight of 2 kilograms (4.4 lb) and diameter of .219 m (0 ft 81⁄2 in) for the men's event, and a weight of 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) and diameter of .180 m (0 ft 7 in) for the women's program. What about basketball? I…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 10:24 AM
2

Something dirty sounding about the 'interrobang'.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:31 AM
-2

Or the other three little words; "nude photos leaked" sorry, had to do it
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:16 PM
2

Did you actively quote mine that while you listened to it, completely tuning out the context? Because you're a fucking idiot if that's your response to that part of the video.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:46 AM
-1

Probably the best response I've seen of this yet.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:02 AM
1

My point is that she hasnt studied sociology, womens studies I'd argue that having studied women's studies would actively harm a persons ability to talk rationally about gender issues/rights.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:00 AM
2

It's not brought up because we care if she's white or not, it's brought up to further display the hypocrisy of feminists and the sjw cunts who constantly criticize others for always have white people front and center, yet they rarely take their own advice.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 01:58 AM
1

That it's not about helping men for the sake of men, it's about helping women in the long run.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 01:55 AM
1

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=man%20pays%20child%20support%20not%20father http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/child-support_n_3672474.html http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/17/11498310/ http://www.independentsentinel.com/should-men-who-arent-biological-fathers-be-forced-to-pay-child-support/
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:10 PM
1

Seriously, what does that even mean?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 10:42 PM
1

Do some click-throughs for that Tarc fellow. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tarc/Manning_statement It has been fun to pretend to be some sort of paleo-conservative, a shtick that I've been doing for awhile at the Wikipediocracy, more or less because some people there have some very easily-pushable buttons. Trolls gunna troll, I guess. I wanted to see what would prevail in the Wikipedia; the social activism side that supports “Chelsea”, the correct choice, or the libertarian-esque side of the…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 10:36 PM
1

nobody talks about responsibility either way The fuck are you talking about? That entire comment chain devolved into a bitch-fest about responsibility.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:28 AM
1

So, you read a tale about a 13 year old boy sticking his finger up his sisters asshole, where she says 'it feels like my boyfriends dick', and you think she's 13 or younger? Seriously?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:27 AM
5

Gotta love the mangina douche behind her smugly smirking as he nods and claps.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:49 AM
4

ohh my god... That entire comment chain gave me cancer. Why does the discussion always have to automatically go to rape? Every fucking time!
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:11 AM
0

She might want to call on women to end hypergamy and gynocentrism first. Because those things are fucking over equality way more than anything men are solely responsible for.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:50 PM
1

I'll get right on that.
/r/PussyPass21/09/14 10:46 PM
4

I wonder if they asked that same question about Ray Rice's girlfriend/wife. Surely they did, right? They wouldn't be sexist, right? Nope, it's misandry all the way down.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:57 PM
2

He reiterated it recently on a google hangout video from his youtube account. The gist of it is that since prosecutors have shown a complete disdain for the process of justice in their incompetence, witch-hunt mentality, 'get the prosecution no matter what' aggressive approach, the push for shifting the burden from the prosecution to prove guilt to the accused to prove innocence, and rampant prosecutorial misconduct, the deck is stacked against the accused right from the get-go. But the icing on…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:50 PM
1

Really? Coming to the number one MRA subreddit to insult MRA's? Fuck off. That's the only reply you deserve. Fuck right off.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:26 AM
5

Outlier? The fuck you say? MRA's don't need to look at outliers to find feminists saying or doing fucked up shit that we should rightly be pissed off about. Shall we consider a US Secretary of State to be an outlier? Have you never heard Hillary Clinton's famous "primary victims of war" quote? Shall we consider the National Organization for Women, among the biggest and more influential feminists organizations in the US, to be an outlier? How many attempts at divorce, alimony, or child custody/su…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:24 AM
11

A few excerpts... Watson said she decided to become a feminist after being called “bossy” She cited women who earn less than men for doing the same work Watson said liberating men from stereotypes ultimately benefits women. I want men to take up this mantle so their daughters, sisters and mothers can be free from prejudice And this is just what I find from doing a quick skim.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:57 AM
3

Do you even understand why he said that? He's explained the reasoning behind it, and then for you to think he said that because he hates women is simply dishonest of you.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:30 AM
2

Having sex with willing women, and then calling them whores, and treating them as lesser creatures for it is real, and every bit as damaging as false rape charges. So, being called a whore is just as damaging as being sent to jail for a decade, and then being labeled as a sex offender for the rest of ones life? Fuck you. That's the only response appropriate for a piece of shit like you.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:28 AM
1

It makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:25 AM
-5

I have an emotional break down over chores at home Grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:34 PM
10

Nevermind the fact that she admitted to it...
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:31 PM
8

An insult is not an ad hom, you dipshit.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:31 PM
5

The point is that they still care more about men earning more than women on average, and not about the deaths of thousands of men.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:01 AM
3

Ohh, I love it!
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:59 AM
1

Relevant video about feminists and Joss Whedon. He absolutely prescribes to the feminist bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 09:20 AM
8

Gosh. Check out the comments on the /tech post: http://www.np.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/2fzmx3/male_birth_control_without_condoms_will_be_here/ So many comments, highly upvoted too, criticizing it for not preventing STD's. Thing is, as a woman, I'm not going to trust any male birth control I cannot actually see. But men are supposed to just trust that you took your pill everyday, or that you actually got that shot? Double standard, much? At least there are a few level headed comments.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:31 PM
1

http://imgur.com/gallery/owh5C
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:00 AM
7

Say nothing to anyone. If confronted directly, flatly deny the accusation(s). Try to avoid people she knows and situations that might include those people or anyone even remotely associated with her or them. Basically, lay low for a while. If contacted by any law enforcement or any lawyer, don't say a word beyond "I do not wish to answer any questions". Also, cut it out with the condescending wording like "porked" and "stupid chick". It just makes you look like some douche at a bar, and makes it…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:33 AM
1

They choose both.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:09 AM
1

Contract law, meet judges who don't give a fuck and will throw out any marriage contract or pre-nup if it means they get to hurt the man.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:00 AM
1

They aid in spell casting.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:32 PM
2

You say x-post, but I'm looking and I'm not finding anything about it on either /gaming or /games. Did the mods purge it? Wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:19 PM
6

widely reported Lol. Don't you know? They don't report threats, they just damsel on twitter. That's the SJW/feminist way.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:04 PM
4

Don't worry. That one person will be fired by tomorrow.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:02 PM
1

Time to play every feminists favorite game again, No True Feminist!
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:53 PM
5

2. Are you sure you were not raped? (If YES, call police and report a rape.) Wait.. What?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:45 AM
2

Going MGTOW doesn't make you immune to the shit, it just lowers your risk of exposure.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:36 PM
5

TRP who want traditionalist, women-in-the-kitch-men-at-work relationships, the guys who truly don't respect women and are basically only in it for personal gain? That's just not true, and a flat out lie.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:08 PM
9

I agree that the idea that there's a mini-game in GTA V where you touch a stripper and then wind up taking her home to sleep with her and basically ditch her afterwards is a bad thing. It has the potential to spread the message that that's an okay thing to do. How the fuck do you make that leap? And in a GTA game, no less! May as well say the game spreads the message that it's okay to rob banks, and assassinate people because there are literally dozens of those kinds of missions, as part of the …
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:43 AM
5

They probably used the ZoeQuinn-tactic to become a default.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:54 AM
2

I miss that user.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 07:29 AM
-5

Probably the same as most media douchebag liberals; if it's white, it ain't right.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:13 AM
9

And if it -just- happened, if he's lucky, the gal still has bits of his skin under her finger nails for some nice air-tight physical evidence.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:50 AM
1

Yep. Send a warning out to all men out there to steer clear.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 07:57 PM
3

there's a higher chance for women to be sexually exploited through human trafficking But that's just not true.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 05:07 AM
2

Hell, a pitbull that bit a 7 year old kid probably gets more due process rights than college men accused of rape.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:12 AM
34

Because it's already being looked at as a human rights thing. No need to frame it as a male rights thing. But, yes, if they were all female workers, you bet your ass the world would care more.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:52 PM
2

I prefer to think of it as ">99% of all in utero infanticides are by women".
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:05 PM
23

And you think human nature changed significantly in 13 years?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:41 AM
0

I asked "So?" and then stated a moral position. I have not assumed anything about your stance. Please don't assume.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:30 PM
-1

Gnnyaaa!! There's so much stupid in your post. It hurts my brain!
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:12 AM
0

So? There's nothing immoral about incest.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:08 AM
2

One dude says to his girlfriend "don't take pictures with black guys", and he's force to sell his NBA team. Some dude says "nappy headed hoes" and he's pretty much forced out of a job. Yeah. Totally no influence.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:45 AM
1

If you're a journalist, you are a public figure. You banging some dude on the side qualifies as news. It's gossip news, like celebrity stuff, but it's still legitimate news. It creating a conflict of interests and unethical practices, it becomes highly relevant.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:10 PM
5

Because black people don't have a lobby NAACP don't real!
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:09 PM
1

It's a routine question they ask everyone. The VA does this with every single patient who goes through ER or gets admitted.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:28 PM
2

Hey now, rape jokes are hysterical.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:47 AM
11

Google machine to the rescue Interesting to note, the second link is a thought catalog article listing it among other quotes as something that should be praised.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 08:30 PM
4

Sounds to me like you have a nice discrimination lawsuit to look forward to, or at the very least, hostile work environment.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:40 AM
2

This is the only bit I've heard about the DVPO dealie. The way the article talks about it, it seems like it's just a kind of special class of restraining order with special punishments. Sounds like another redundant law to "help protect the victims" when there's already laws in place. The kind of thing lazy politicians toss out there so they don't appear to be "soft of crime" or some other bullshit platitude.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:15 AM
10

Because discrimination against men is perfectly acceptable. I thought we've been over this before?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:54 AM
3

Man. Even when they do something nice regarding men, it's still just to appease women. Feels like we'll never win.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:33 AM
0

Where is that implied? I'm just saying I'm reserving belief.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 07:14 AM
0

This sub has along history of troll posts about "was I raped", and then a day or two later the ensuing "gotcha" posts on other subs like /amr. This one resembles them a little too closely.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:49 AM
0

First of all, if you have to ask if you were raped, you most likely weren't. It's like asking if someone attacked you. If you are unsure if it happened, chances are it didn't. Secondly, this story is waaay to similar to other troll posts we've gotten almost exactly like this before. Not to mention this is a throwaway account. I'm withholding my belief in this story.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 07:13 PM
1

Does that site not have an archive of some kind where I can listen to select shows on demand? I can't seem to find anything there except what's broadcasting now.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 05:03 AM
1

most people do not live in the same dimension they do Uhh... All people live in the same dimension. Philosophical arguments are only productive if done among peers. That's because only philosophers care about philosophical arguments. The rest of us rational people understand that a philosophical argument doesn't mean shit in the real world.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:36 PM
3

I like how the use of the np. makes it look like you followed the np. rule, but the link still takes you to a non-np. version.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:25 PM
2

Wait, is it 3 or 4? If we kill one man to save 3 others, and end up saving all 4, how does killing the one man save that same man?
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:24 PM
3

Because traditionalism has a lot of gynocentrism behind it. They may be anti-feminism, but that doesn't mean they are pro-MRA.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:56 PM
2

Not apprehensive about being associated with JB. They already are associated with JB, through AVfM. She's been on some of their shows a few times. They're apprehensive about embracing the WAF thing that's going on now. JtO's video Diana's video They're basically concerned it might just be traditionalists doing their normal thing, and want to know if they're for what they're for, or just more gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:31 PM
3

With JtO and Diana Davison recently posting videos about their apprehension in embracing WAF, and them being associated with Judgy Bitch, I wonder what their thoughts on this are now. I'm behind on AVfM's shows, so maybe they discussed it more there. Will have to catch up. I would like to see any of the three show up and discuss this a bit more.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:42 AM
2

therefore, technically, he raped them. FTFY
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:41 AM
-4

This is a gays thing, not a mens thing. Why is this on here?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:21 AM
4

It's not my job to educate you, shitlord!
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:20 PM
0

Just saying "gendered-violence" makes the poster shit. So tired of that bullshit term.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:24 PM
-2

Hahaha. Your idiocy humors me.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 07:55 AM
1

It also takes a deliberate decision to up/downvote something, or to post in a cross-posted thread. If someone wants to make the deliberate decision to up/downvote something or post in the thread, they'll also just make the deliberate decision to delete the np. part.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:26 AM
1

Because deleting the 'np.' and hitting enter is sooo haaard, right? What a stupid rule.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:07 AM
6

Good first-look analysis. When I first saw that link on the front page, I instantly rolled my eyes, knowing it would be another bullshit feminist propaganda piece. The "study" was an online survey. One that was allowed to be tossed around willy-nilly. It was allowed to be posted up on any blog, which could carry its own set of biases and agendas. Further, an online, self-selected survey such as this is no better than a news site's question-of-the-day poll. Because it is self-selected, the respon…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:28 PM
3

Why stop there? Let's have different courts for black people, and different courts for rich people, and different courts for mormons. We should move away from treating all offenders in the same manner. Some citizens are more equal than others, after all, right?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:26 AM
1

So, what, it should be an unpunishable crime? Fuck you.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:39 AM
-2

Agnostic is a stupid term and should just be obliterated.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 03:26 AM
2

What facts are said statements ignorant of?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:44 PM
2

The left were some of the biggest pushers of that bullshit in the 90s, they just moved on to scare-mongering about other things. Even still, they are the ones who present it the most. This is among politicians, oddly enough it's reversed with pundits.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:15 PM
8

You're saying the girls aren't good enough to compete with the big boys, that they need their own special area to play. That's the sexism. Why not just come out and admit you think women should get special treatment? The only reason people even feel the need to have female only events is because few gals compete at that level of play, and people have that persistent misguided notion that gals need equal representation. So they demand that boys be excluded so that more girls can get in. That, too…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:37 PM
26

So, special treatment and sexism? Gotcha. If girl gamer's ever want to be taken seriously, this bullshit about female only tournaments and people giving a shit about them just because they're female needs to end. Unless they want to just come out and admit that girl gamer's suck and can't hack it with the big boys.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:13 PM
-2

Am I the only one who thinks they only people who should appear on the birth certificate are the biological parents? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:37 AM
0

Welp. No point in trying to have a rational conversation with a tool who scoffs at the notion that a normal emotional reaction can be irrational. Peace out, cuntbag.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:49 AM
0

You're the one defending No I'm not. I'm not defending anyone. I'm just saying you have a shitty argument. You call the reaction that everyone has to being screamed at "an irrational fear" That's because it is. How many protesters do you ever see follow up their vocals with a sucker punch? It's exceedingly rare, to the point that it would be a shocker if it happened. Fearing something that's not going to happen is irrational. trying to intimidate you into not exercising your rights. They're tryi…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:43 AM
2

But in all seriousness, you're an idiot. Saying the fear a dog irrationally perceives as a threat from being yelled at is somehow parallel to the irrationally perceived threat a person might feel is just a pathetic argument. Someone having an irrational fear of something doesn't mean shit-all about banning that something.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:13 AM
1

I've also pointed at a gopher, and it peed itself. Then a lab proceeded to bite it in half. What I'm really saying is, a german shepard likes to pee itself.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:45 AM
1

Go scream in a german shepard's face, watch out it reacts. I've done that. It just peed itself.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:38 AM
1

Yeah. Not giving the satisfaction of another page view with title like that.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:31 AM
4

You're probably the same kind of asshole who comes into threads about circumcision and shrieks "but FGM is horrible, guys! Stop providing only a one-sided argument with your bias!" Fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:29 AM
1

Her actions do hurt real victims of rape No, they don't. Please stop it with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:46 PM
1

HAHAHAHA!! I'm sorry, that was mean. hahaha
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:28 AM
1

I'm really becoming aware of the degree to which men aren't supposed to have agency in sex, and the degree to which myself and others have internalized the notion that we're always supposed to want it, that's it's never bad No. This is not some "internalized" bullshit, this is biology. This is what thousands of generations of evolution has done to many, many species.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:23 AM
1

AlphaWookie was referring to the person who posted the link here on reddit, not the author of the article. Specifically talking about the thread title, here on reddit. He was interpreting the previous post to be talking specifically about the reddit thread post title.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:42 PM
0

So, you just proved me right, and admitted you were wrong. I don't really see why you posted that excerpt. "Saying you don't care what a person has to say because they're a bitch is not an ad hominem." Wrong; this is patently an ad hominem. By attempting to dismiss the argument (rabble rabble feminism) by attacking the arguer's character (calling her a bitch), you make an ad hominem attack. No, it isn't. Not caring to even hear what someone has to say is not a rebuttal to an argument. The person…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:02 AM
0

You seriously need to look up what an ad hominem is. It's embarrassing how many people talk about logical fallacies as if they know what they mean, and they're completely wrong. Again, an insult is NOT an ad hominem. An insult is just basically name calling or saying something mean about a person. An ad hominem is when an argument is dismissed because of some characteristic of the person making the argument, as if the characteristic someone disproves the argument. Calling someone a name is not a…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:51 PM
1

I wanna be a motherfucking dragon, which I'm defining as A MOTHAFUCKIN' DRAGON!
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:11 PM
0

You're an idiot. An insult is not an ad hominem. Now, shut the fuck up, and stop spewing stupidity.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 08:35 AM
-1

While the guy's first sentence of his latter post was stupid, you're still an idiot.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 08:33 AM
10

You can be a giraffe. Also, I'm redefining giraffe to mean paraplegic.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:29 AM
-4

I've never heard anyone anywhere in real life refer to their lover as their "partner", outside of gay couples. I only ever see it on the internet.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:28 AM
2

What disassembled that pile of atoms? ... other atoms. Well, shit, now I don't have to give a fuck about anything. Nice!
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:14 AM
9

Heads you win, tails I lose. I am so sick of this bullshit. Men are targeted: "It's because women are seen as more fragile, not a threat. It's misogyny!" Women are target: "It's because they hate women. It's misogyny!" Seriously, fuck off with that bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:09 AM
1

What does you being a woman have to do with any of this?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:33 PM
1

Why does this not surprise me in the slightest?
/r/PussyPass04/06/14 08:01 PM
2

Apparently they think all little girls are like Lizzy from The Walking Dead, and they just don't know it's wrong to repeatedly stab others in the chest.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:50 PM
1

The fuck does the first paragraph have to do with the main point of your post? It's a huge red herring, almost as if you're trying to set up some bullshit sympathy or poisoning the well shite.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:29 AM
2

(Sorry, I may have rambled on a lot more than I expected to.) The inability for people to think the same way another does is something that's really hard for a lot of people. It takes practice, and for most people it's not something they want to practice. That's what's going on here. Those kinds of people are stubborn in their views and don't even want to try and see it from the other side. For them, the only active participation a man gets to take in the decision of making a baby is when he exp…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:05 AM
1

The MRM wants to literally rape all women to death. I thought this was part of our mission statement. Isn't it in the sidebar? I'm sure I saw it there not too long ago. /s
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:21 AM
11

You're a hypocrite. You don't see how all of these arguments you're making are rejected by pro-choicers when applied to women. Absolutely. People (most of whom are pro-choicers) who argue against male legal parental surrender use the same "you knew the consequences when you had sex" line some pro-lifers use. The irony is thick. Almost all of the "arguments" people use against male legal parental surrender are damn near word-for-word used by pro-lifers to argue against abortion, and these "argume…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:16 AM
1

Her oldest son is 19 like 16 or something, I think. So, yeah.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:55 PM
2

What, you thought people would stop thinking of men as evil wife-beating, rapist perpetrators? There's your first mistake...
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:43 AM
1

And this is why I will continue to laugh when someone tries to say gals are treated less fairly than guys. Fucking idiotic bigots.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:28 AM
2

I completely understand why children must be saved first. I don't. If we're going to be logical about it, children should be low on the priority list.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:14 PM
1

Thank you for confirming that you are okay with child kidnapping as long as it's been long enough for Stockholm syndrome to kick in, and that you think returning said kidnapped child to its rightful parent is a wrong. Gotchas.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:03 AM
-8

Thank you for confirming you're okay with child kidnapping as long as the kidnappers have the child for a very long time and Stockholm syndrome has set in. Gotchas.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 01:37 AM
-3

ITT: People okay with child kidnapping and not giving the kid back to their rightful parent as long as it's long enough for Stockholm syndrome to kick in.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:43 AM
7

Warning: Most gender scholars in our universities have degrees in fields like English or comparative literature–not biology or neuroscience. These self-appointed experts on sexuality are scientifically illiterate. They substitute dogma and propaganda for reasoned scholarship. My favorite part.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:44 AM
3

Of course, predictably, the article focuses solely on the points where it says women have a more difficult time with a task than a man. Nevermind the other points where the post says men have a more difficult time with certain other tasks. Maybe the post should include that women get more butthurt more easily than men.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 02:37 AM
-12

So, you can reproduce with yourself? Wow. That's pretty neat. You should have a medical journal written about you. Usually only simpler organisms can do that, but a human? Now that's wondrous.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 11:37 PM
2

Him being a man isn't the part of the story that's worth talking, it's him being gay. Unless you want to include every issue for every man simply because they're men, in which case you'd have to start caring about every man everywhere who has an issue with anything, and that just leads to absurdities.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:26 PM
-8

This is an LBG thingie, not a MRA thingie. Shoo.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:54 PM
1

Quoting the bible... that's a paddlin'.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:10 PM
-8

Ugh. This has nothing to do with MR. I wish this would just go away.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 08:37 PM
2

And who's doing the molestering? Other men. It's men molestering other men, therefore we don't have to care about them, and they shan't be considered victims. /feministlogic
/r/MensRights04/05/14 11:25 AM
1

No. anon445 does not have a point. They do not have a point at all, about anything.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 11:20 AM
-7

No, it doesn't. This bullshit needs to stop now.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:36 AM
2

I feel your addition of 'agreement' and 'null and void' take it away from 'animal family' and make it more human-centric.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 08:06 PM
1

No one's saying anything about "guilty until proven innocent". This asshole is advocating that a she-said account should be enough evidence to convict someone. And if it might have once been argued he's just describing the current system, and not his person opinions, all that was tossed out when he said this gem: I'm not convinced every false accusation was a raging feminist out for blood. It seems a lot more reasonable to me it is someone who truly believes they were a victim. Taking everything…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:04 PM
6

Just her word on the matter is good enough to convict, provided that it sufficiently convincing. And of course, if the girl thinks she was raped, that testimony will be quite convincing. Wow. The world needs less people like you.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:18 AM
7

Any minute now. I'm sure the feminists are going to jump right on this one.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:18 AM
6

I think all but one of the job interviews I've had in the past 15 years have all been with women. People suggesting that men make the hiring decisions is a joke to me.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:03 AM
6

Please explain to me, in clear, concise, and unambiguous words with common definitions that everyone agrees on, what a "non-physical rape" is. Truly, I'm hanging on my seat wanting to hear your response.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 08:13 AM
-6

It's possible he's just a shitty coach. =P
/r/MensRights20/04/14 07:19 PM
3

Then again, the bible says the same thing. So there's that.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 09:35 PM
1

they showed that eating chocolate while drinking orange soda... Showed ... ? You never finished that sentence. Also, yeah. I would. The plural of anecdote is not evidence.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:17 AM
12

to be treated as equals in education and labor Women are more than welcome to help fix that inequality in labor. Virginia could always use more coal miners. Alaska is welcoming more deck hands on crab boats. Still need to narrow that 'workplace deaths' gap, girls!
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:03 AM
20

Again, sorry about that poll, guys. Totally my bad on that one. 18 year old, atheist, strong conservative, for the legalization of pot, checking in. Sorry about the poll results, guys. I got super high one night and kept forgetting that I already took the survey, and just kept filling it out 2700 times.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 09:55 AM
2

Absolutely. They bring that shit up all the time. They bring it up as if it is evidence for why they still need "true feminism". As if some bullshit happening in some third-world shit hole justifies "activism" in the western world. I call them out on this obvious bullshit all the time, and the only response I ever get is "you don't think that what's happening to them there is bad!? you misogynist!". Every fucking time. They can't even grasp the point I'm making.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:42 AM
2

Remember, it's "Her body, her choice". There is no "His body, his choice".
/r/MensRights15/04/14 07:19 PM
5

The internet is your oyster. Google, and you shall find.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:35 PM
31

18 year old, atheist, strong conservative, for the legalization of pot, checking in. Sorry about the poll results, guys. I got super high one night and kept forgetting that I already took the survey, and just kept filling it out 2700 times.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:34 PM
1

Why does "It's not okay?" have a question mark in it?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:35 PM
6

reddit tip: press -enter- twice to start a new paragraph.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:01 AM
1

That's fucked up. Let's think about this for a bit. Is the sympathy and support people offer the gal in this situation because of losing out on a potential kid that they wanted to have, or was it for the uncomfortable bodily happenings that come with a miscarriage? If it's the latter, than that's just silly. People experience more bodily trauma in some car accidents. Seems like people are going overboard with the sympathy hugs if that's the case. If it's the former, then the potential father is …
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:46 AM
1

My favorite part was where I predicted your response, and that was still the only response you could muster. Fucking classic.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:28 AM
0

Dat Dunning-Kruger effect. It's sad when the ones the most wrong think they're the most right. inb4 "No, you are!"
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:01 AM
0

The comment was talking about a hypothetical situation that could arise in the future. You're commenting as if he's talking about a situation that happened in the past. You're talking nonsense. And you're a dumbass.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:46 AM
1

to grow up unable to regulate the impulse I don't see anywhere where someone grabbed a boob.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:58 PM
2

You didn't actually read his comment, did you? He DIDN'T say anyone did grab anyone's breasts.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:53 PM
-2

The irony. Telling people who sigh at trigger warnings to grow up, when it's the immature twats who find trigger warnings to be a good thing are the ones who need to grow up.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:36 PM
-1

Seriously, fuck OP and his stupid fucking trigger warning.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:34 PM
11

No, feminism is not about equality.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:46 PM
0

Because they're considered secondary sexual characteristics. If it's sexual assault to grab it, they don't get to show it in public. They don't get to pretend they're sexual things when they want to cry foul, and then pretend they're not sexual things when they want to be topless. They don't get to play tails I lose, heads they win.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 11:13 PM
2

if you ask most 17-year-olds or 16-year-olds whether they know (underage sex) was an offence carrying seven years’ imprisonment, they would die with their leg in the air. Now, I'm sure it was meant in the cartoony 'fall on your back, legs together straight in the air' kind of way, but reading that line with talk of sex, it takes on a whole new meaning.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 11:10 PM
1

Putting words to print to communicate to others is a tool of the patriarchy, and they explain this, but putting words to print to communicate to others. They are the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:52 PM
77

As, 'rape report, no conviction', to add more to the 'x% of rapists get away with it'.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:42 PM
5

Their self-esteem also starts like 10 times higher, so they still end up pretty damn high.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 06:22 AM
1

Hell, I actively rebel when people start throwing around that kind of shit, along with the offense olympics crap.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:52 AM
1

Whoever files the charge first.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:06 AM
5

Nevermind the phished for discussion about consent/responsibility; just as a bar has a legal obligation and duty to cut people off when they are getting too drunk, so too should casinos.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:45 PM
-3

I wasn't arguing the level of acceptableness, I was saying it's not harassment. In order for it to be harassment, the person has to be harassed. In order for the person to be harassed, they have to actually have some effect affect them. Your pathetic attempt at an analogy with theft is pathetic.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:06 PM
-3

How can it be harassment if the "victim" party is potentially completely unaware of the event in question? That just shits on the definition of the word harassment, to harass.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:55 AM
1

And I think throwing a hissy fit and throwing people in jail over a couple of collected photons is indefensible. So there's that side of the coin.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:52 AM
10

Did you miss the "whether the person is fully nude or not" part in that quotation? Taking that literally, by the letter of the law, you cannot take a picture of anyone in public because just about any picture of a person would include their "fully nude or not" "private parts".
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:48 AM
5

76% of rape allegations result in no conviction or caution. So 76% of allegations could be a false rape allegation. Actually, 100% of allegations could be false. Just because someone is convicted and goes to jail doesn't mean it's not from a false allegation.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:15 AM
5

/r/NoShitSherlock
/r/MensRights05/03/14 03:22 AM
10

Says the hypocrite going around sexually harassing women in front of dozens. Peez is such a hypocritical tool. It would be funny if he and his ilk weren't so aggressive in trying to ruin people's lives.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:29 AM
10

When she was released from the Marathon County Jail, she returned home and again barricaded her roommate in his bedroom and refused to let him out. Police were called again, forced their way into the home, and arrested Boyd again. On Friday, a judge in the Marathon County Circuit Court sentenced Boyd to nine months probation. Boyd will avoid any further time in jail, the judge said, so long as she “stays out of trouble.” Woooow. A guy would get 10+ years of assault, kidnapping, and a whole host …
/r/PussyPass03/03/14 09:05 PM
3

I, too, am able to read. Throughout the entire exchange, in context no less, is them talking about fucking, having sex, banging, etc. But then one fucking time they say "punish" and you jump all over that and you call that a fucking rape threat? You truly are retarded.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:54 PM
2

Number 1 is bullying? Fuck off, Cracked.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:51 PM
3

Those guys were taking about... Ohh, so you're a mind reader then. Sorry, I didn't know who I was dealing with. Obviously you know what was going through their minds. You should just let everyone know that ahead of time so we can all acknowledge your grand wisdom.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:47 PM
3

'Punish' is a verb used to describe the veracity of the fucking. I take you haven't watched porn before? Actresses often spout "yeah, punish that pussy, fuck it hard" with great zeal. The entire idiocy of calling this anything to do with rape hangs solely on this single word, and it is destroyed by the simple fact that it is used joyfully during sex. Now, shoo! Off with you, femi-cunt.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:34 PM
10

Your wright, he red it write.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:26 PM
7

That's what makes it so funny.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:21 PM
13

You have the right to pay 14 years back-pay worth of child support. That's probably about it.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:51 AM
6

Ohh, look. More feminist hypocrisy. Whoda thunk it.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:24 PM
1

This is not a men's issue. This is a gays issue. Just because more men are affected by this no more makes this a men's issue than would a gun control issue, just because more men are affected by it than women.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:21 AM
-1

Not liking gay people is not a fear. Stop calling it a phobia.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:14 AM
1

Stop saying "pro-circumcision" and start calling it like it is, "pro-infant mutilation".
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:34 PM
-2

Wow. The white knight douchiness is strong in these comments.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:30 PM
0

Sounds like someone has a case of the uglies.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:07 PM
-1

Only one that really sticks out is a woman being charged for making a false accusation and being expelled. Everything else is all too typical.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:00 PM
2

Rape jokes are funny. Go build a bridge and get over it.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:31 PM
1

its seeming heavily stacked What is "it"? You never established what that is a pronoun for.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 07:04 AM
2

An abortion pill isn't a poison. It's a medication. A medication administered in a therapeutic dose is not a poison. How is that hard to understand? Slipping someone a tylenol isn't poisoning them, no more than in this situation. But go ahead and play the whiteknight. A bit surprising coming from you. You're usually more reasonable than this.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:59 PM
2

So, let's think about this for a bit. The whole "safe haven" drop-off sites laws were put in place because women kept tossing babies in dumpsters, right? They gave women the ability to abandon responsibility of the baby rather than just punishing women who kill their babies. So now let's make this a little bit more equal for men, too, yeah? Instead of giving men no option other than to kill babies/fetuses maybe we should give men the ability to abdicate their responsibility to the baby, just lik…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 12:28 PM
0

14 years for slipping a medication to someone is bullshit. If we're just going to treat a 7 week fetus as a non-person, I would see the whole thing as little different than the ole laxative in food prank. A dick move, to be sure, but not worthy of even a single year in prison.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 12:21 PM
1

I'm just saying your bullshit about governments having no legitimate claim to territory is idiotic nonsense. And that by saying that, you may as well say no one has a legitimate claim over any property. Really don't understand why you're twisting my words to pretend I'm saying no one owns anything. But then again, that's what indoctrinated fools do. Best of luck with getting over it. You're not worth the effort to explain all this in great length. Peace out.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:34 AM
1

You're the dumbass comparing ownership of one's own body to the ownership of land. Get well soon, even though I doubt that indoctrination will shake off.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:24 AM
1

Sigh. I can't fight this level of indoctrination, it won't get anywhere. Hope you get better someday!
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:25 PM
1

You really need to learn to fuckin' read, bro. So you're telling me that if all the white students in a class say "I don't want to work with anyone who isn't white", this is OK with you? Nowhere anywhere did I say that. What I said was, that one person saying they don't want to work with another person is not a violation of that other persons rights. How is this hard to grasp? If you were the teacher you'd just set up 8 groups of all white people and 4 groups of all non-whites? If you bothered t…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:02 PM
3

The fuck? lol No it's not. People don't have a right to work with whoever they want, particularly when that other person doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:15 AM
2

So, how does anything you said relate to what I actually posted?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:06 AM
1

Government has no legitimate claim over a territory. The exact same thing could be said for ownership of literally anything. Everything belongs to everyone, and nothing belongs to anyone. But what fucking good does that do anything to say that?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:15 AM
6

I'm so confused. How the fuck are they twisting one person's request to not have to attend in-class sessions be a violation of a separate persons rights? That aside, these religious accommodation requests are a bit ridiculous. Reasonable and sensible requirements are put in place. If your religion won't allow you to meet those requirements, then that's the fault of your religion, it's not on others to twist to your religion. If a job requirement is "answer phones", you don't get the job if your …
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:48 AM
1

You sound like a whiny bitch.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:19 AM
1

This guy killed a baby growing inside someone. How's that any different than a normal abortion, or a self-taken morning after pill? Why the double standard?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:18 AM
1

The Great Toilet Seat debate could be likened to the shower curtain. Some uppity bitch shouts that people should pull the shower curtain closed after a shower because the next time the shower is to be used the person might want the shower curtain to start out closed. When really, just fucking close the curtain your damn self before you go to take a shower. Who gives a shit how it was when you entered the room? Put it to your preference.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 09:50 AM
1

How is this "getting it right"? This is standard practice with just about any company. The application of that, of course, is typically extremely biased.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:01 AM
7

Exactly. I was at the store one time, and this little kid, maybe 4 or 5, was ripping open some medicine packaging right next to the pharmacy pickup. I just sat and watched for a good minute. When he finally almost had the pills out, only then did I do anything. I just let the nearest employee I could find know a kid was ripping open a package, and promptly left the scene. No way I was going to go anywhere near the kid.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:43 AM
0

Also, from what I hear, the creator of xkcd doesn't want to be associated with /r/xkcd.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:27 AM
2

First line in About Us LifeNews.com is an independent news agency devoted to reporting news that affects the pro-life community. Surely, a completely objective and unbiased source for abortion news. That aside, it's really bothered me for a while that the "Pro-choice" side of the issue seem to think it's all about "my body, my choice" "bodily autonomy" and all the other stupid buzz-phrases. It's not about any of that, it's about, and always has been about, whether or not any developing fetus/emb…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:45 PM
6

safe way to bring up the topic of consent The fuck does that even mean? Is it like, "shit, I brought up consent in a less than ideal way, and now there's a mountain lion attacking me!"?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:23 AM
0

You seem to have trouble separating insults from an argument. I started using the insults to make a clear example of what an insult is, since your dumb ass couldn't understand that calling a line of thinking retarded is not an insult to any person.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:24 AM
0

Are you retarded? Do you not know the difference between "you're an idiot" and "that line of thinking is idiotic"?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:40 AM
0

I'm saying their line of thinking is treating us as imbeciles. They're the cunts who are doing the insulting. Are you so fucked in the head you can't discern insults to a person from explaining how a particular line of thinking is fucked up?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:31 AM
1

And where's the insult in that? I'm saying the line of thinking they're running with is batshit.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:11 AM
0

Where did I insult anyone?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 11:07 PM
0

Gahd, I hate that line of thinking. It's as if people with that line of thinking think all other people are mentally retarded 8 year olds. Anyone with half a brain would understand how retarded that line of thinking is.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 07:38 AM
2

So, rape as a punishment is unacceptable, but murder as a punishment is acceptable? I thought most people agree that murder is worse than rape?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 07:30 AM
-2

Again. You're not listening to what I'm saying, and you're being a closed minded cunt. You get set in your mindset about a group of people and then that's all you ever see. If you think they're just misogynists, you're an idiot. They are against abortion because they would rather a child come to term and be born rather than aborted, not because "rawr, hate women". They would like to limit the number of elective abortions, and they think that there would be fewer of them if more women knew more a…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 11:43 PM
-2

They consider it necessary to have fully informed consent. That's why they consider it a necessary step in the procedure. You're arguing all the wrong points.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:41 PM
-1

Like I said earlier, there's a difference between an emergency surgery, and an elective procedure. Your analogy is shit because the consequences aren't the same. If not having the abortion meant certain death, maybe you'd be closer to being valid, but you're no where near it. It's entirely elective. See? No rape.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:58 PM
-2

There's a difference between elective procedures and emergency surgery, you know that, right? Not to mention I'm not arguing that it's a good practice, or even a worthwhile one, just that it's not rape.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:19 PM
-2

"If you want to do procedure x, you also need to do procedure y. Do you agree to these terms?" Where's the rape?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:08 AM
0

How is that rape? That is a medical procedure, one each patient would fully consent to.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:48 AM
0

Wait, when did republicans go around raping women?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:26 AM
3

No. It's not a good emblem. It's a blatant ripoff of the feminism one. It'd immediately bring to mind in people the feminism logo, and we don't want to be associated with feminism. No thanks.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:04 AM
59

Wow. That poor bastard. Brainwashed from birth to be a "militant feminist".
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:52 AM
-2

I'm saying it doesn't belong on this sub. What's wrong with that?
/r/MensRights12/01/14 10:32 PM
8

What about the giant space sails? The ship gets propulsion by having its sails blown. Blown. Blowjob. That's all men want. They just use the sails as a metaphor for getting blowjobs. Those evil, penis-centric men.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:28 PM
69

Wow. So saying "just because someone's a woman doesn't mean they deserve automatic respect" is "supporting rape culture"? The fuck is wrong with people...
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:21 PM
-3

Please keep this SJW-level kind of muckery off this sub. Please.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:14 PM
1

The streaker has given the audience something which comes at a significant cost to him, his naked image and this girl has shown no appreciation or acknowledgement for this fact. Pay him a compliment, pay him respect for his courage or show some interest in his physicality. Showing yourself naked is deeply personal to most people, and then he was arrested for presenting this gift to everyone. It's shameful. Downright misandrist. FTFY
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:48 PM
0

I keep trying to learn to appreciate my body, but people keep shaming me for my body hair. I try to appreciate my neckbeard, but then people hurt my feels. :(
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:23 PM
1

Don't miss this gem... http://www.reddit.com/r/CrazyIdeas/comments/1uq5pd/no_more_males/ Yeah, that's right. Execute all men. Sounds like a bastion of love and equality.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:32 AM
12

In This Post: commas and periods in all the wrong places.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:11 AM
2

ITT: Butthurt feminists doing their usual downvote brigading.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:02 AM
1

ITT: Massive downvote brigading.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:04 AM
4

Yeah. Better to just post songs from youtube, right? rolls eyes
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:31 AM
3

Fuck. Why do feminists have to stick their dick into everything?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:28 AM
3

If you opt to ignore them, you're just letting them get away with whatever the fuck they want. That's not acceptable.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:26 AM
3

Why the fuck is this stickied? This shit should be deleted.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:13 AM
3

South Park style? Come on, men! We gotta fight these goobacks by having a bunch of gay sex with each other!
/r/MensRights07/01/14 11:36 AM
3

Hey guys, I found the feminist in the thread!
/r/MensRights07/01/14 11:33 AM
1

I made a graph. ... I make lots of graphs. =| ... =(
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:11 AM
1

Resorting to that argument has never been necessary in regards to this issue. Because people care more about females than males, apparently.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:49 PM
0

Shouldn't how it can benefit women be a part of the discussion? No. I know we all want to appeal to women's selfish nature, but I see the person directly affected by mutilation as the primary concern. Is "how it can benefit men" part of the discussion on female circumcision? Is "how it can benefit people" part of the discussion on animal torture? etc. etc.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:27 PM
1

Holy fuck, you're retarded. Do you not know how to compartmentalize your activities? So, now understanding that "hey, this movement does this thing, and this other movement does this other thing, and I can be a part of both of them without forcing them to melt together" is hate? Wanting to do good for goodness sake is hate?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 07:04 PM
0

How do you not understand the MRM is about men? answer for why it would be a good idea to not help anyone who asks for it? Where the fuck are you getting this? If you want to help anyone, help anyone, but it's not under the banner of the MRM. If I want to go donate blood, I'm doing it for goodness sake, not under the banner of MRM. If I want a few bucks to cancer research, I'm doing it for goodness sake, not for the MRM. When I voted no on Cali's prop 8, I did it for goodness sake, not for the M…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:52 PM
0

No. The MRM is about and for men. If you want a movement that encompasses everyone everywhere, try something else. Please stop diluting the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:39 PM
0

In other words, gynocentrism. All about how it can be a benefit for women.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:36 PM
0

I think Men's Rights is about the rights of men. You think Men's Rights is about the rights about everyone everywhere. Which do you think makes more sense? You're the tool who's diluting the MRM to not be about men.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:27 PM
0

This is /MR. Take that shit to /r/Egalitarianism
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:20 PM
6

Yeah, toootally just and right. /s
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:09 AM
-3

It's a random posters name, not a wing of the rights movement. Holy shit. Get off your high horse. Rape jokes are hilarious. Enough with the Offended Olympics.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:02 AM
-7

Pro-tactics: Dig through someones post history to find something to quote mine so you can use that to discredit the person wholesale, rather than addressing what they are saying this time. Or something like that, right?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 09:57 AM
-6

And what's that have to do with anything? People make joke names all over the place.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:00 AM
-18

How'd that saying go? "A rose by any other name would smell gross, and now I hate it." Or you could just go "his name is a name I don't like, therefore he's a poopy-face!"
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:23 AM
-28

Remember, if someone posts something that challenges feminist ideas, they're obviously a troll. Terrible mod is terrible.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 12:42 AM
0

Looks like we found the oversensitive feminist cunt for the thread.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 12:35 AM
-1

Holy fuckin' word salad, batman. Also, did you even read what I wrote? Because you're reading into it waaay too much. I wasn't calling you a cunt, but I am now, cunt. And about that, why the fuck do you bring up any mention of your sex? Where was that ever suggested? Why do people always feel the need to NAWALT all over the place, or be like "but also the other gender does/doesn't do that, too!"? And then there's always some stupid cunt willing to bemoan sexism and misogyny over it. It's fuckin'…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:10 AM
0

And what's hateful against women about being annoyed by people not understanding what's being said?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 04:05 AM
2

They're highlighting the issue with the awful thing, so that hopefully the system that allows and even encourages it changes.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 10:09 PM
4

Same reason voting is anonymous in most countries.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:56 PM
9

Ummm... Paul Elam's not a PUA. He's making a point about the behaviors of men and women, and how flipping the power dynamic can lead to change.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:36 PM
2

Well, as we found out earlier this week, Hitler was an MRA. So it only follows logically...
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:29 PM
-1

Because PatriarchyTM hurts men too. Duh.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 11:17 AM
-2

Since when do we give a fuck about what radfem cunts think about us?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:40 AM
0

This gem puts out huge red flags.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:44 AM
0

Also, this... I didn't think I got raped at first. I thought it was cool I got laid but my RA told me my thinking was a little messed up and I started to realize different.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 12:37 AM
2

Pretty much what others said. Replace any instance of "men" with "Indians". The old sexism/racism switcheroo. Document that shit and bring it to a higher up. Skip your immediate supervisor, they play favorites way too much, and try to sweep it under the rug just so you get back to work. It certainly qualifies for a hostile work environment.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:59 PM
1

STFU. We're just tired of cunts dropping in just to spout "NAWALT!! OMG, you guys are so sexist over here!"
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:14 PM
0

Uhh, no. Informing a community about someones past, and letting them decide if they want to interact with that person, is not fucking vigilante justice. The fuck are you smoking?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:11 PM
71

As if we needed any further evidence that feminists just want "fathers" to be walking atm's for the "empowered single mother".
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:03 PM
0

It's a slap in the face to men. It's like, "we know dad's aren't included in 'family', but I guess they can be included in this lounge".
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:08 AM
0

Yeah it is. You have two groups of men who would like to advocate for what they think should be their rights. That you agree with one and not the other is irrelevant in the point I'm making. Just because it's a group of men advocating for their rights doesn't mean the MRM gives two shits about those rights. It's the particular set of rights the MRM cares about, not just "a group of men". And gay marriage is not part of the rights the MRM is concerned with.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:31 PM
2

I have sympathy for the person who got in a bike accident, but I'm not about to try and include their issues into the MRM. Let the MRM be what it is. Stop trying to pile other shit ontop of it. This isn't fucking Atheism Plus (or, A-plus-theism).
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:39 AM
0

That's retarded. That's like saying boy-loving men are men, therefore: We are here for mensrights, that includes North America Man Boy Love Association. Just because a group is made up of men, doesn't mean the MRM gives two-shits about their cause.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:36 AM
6

No. Just no. Gay Marriage has nothing to do with MRM. Gay marriage would not help the MRM. Almost every law regarding marriage (beyond requiring male/female marriage) is already gender-neutral. Having some overly-PC wording like you dream of wouldn't do anything to help, as we already have that. It's the application, the cunt fuck-faced judges and system that fuck over men, not the laws.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:25 AM
2

Reminds me of this tale People get charged with some kind of manslaughter for far less. Should definitely be charged with something.
/r/PussyPass10/12/13 07:21 AM
4

Woman files for divorce because she's bored of the marriage and isn't being entertained enough by the husband. The man wasn't doing enough to satisfy her, therefore, obviously, it's the mans fault. Super simple stuff.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:46 AM
0

Feminism never fought for equality. They fought, and continue to fight, for benefits without responsibilities. Any time a benefit they could have gotten came up, they either fought against it (so they wouldn't have to take the corresponding responsibilities) or they fought for the benefit so long as they didn't have to receive the responsibilities. Take suffrage. It was initially fought against. But once they found out they could get it without also getting the responsibilities, only then did th…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:37 AM
19

You shut your whore mouth.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:53 AM
6

Hypoagency & Hyperagency. Women are never to blame. Men are always responsible, even if it's a woman doing it.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:52 AM
-1

Literally. Take your fist and shove it up your cunt.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:30 AM
1

Haven't you heard? Men aren't a protected class.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:53 AM
7

In other words, our purchasing habits won't change =P
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:52 AM
8

Stop being a cunt, and learn to read. "If they ('they' being those people on reddit with the point of view that white men can't be discriminated against) are a woman, yadda yadda..." We get that context for "they" in the previous post by OP saying "plenty of people on reddit who have that point of view". And we get the context for "that point of view" from the previous post saying "white men can't be discriminated against". So you pretending /u/PointsOutRaceCard is referring to all women everywh…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:46 AM
17

I don't know about you, but when I bought my car, there was no notary standing by to notarize anything. Pretty sure it was still considered a contract. You don't need to notarize a contract for it to be legal.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:30 PM
0

I've seen pornography. Therefore, I am a victim of sexism.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 11:22 PM
7

You must be new here. Do some light browsing of past posts. Stories of those kinds of things happen all the time and get posted.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:02 PM
165

Okay, I'll play. Daycare worker She just loves children | Surely he's a pedophile Killed spouse 3 months suspended sentence | 25 to life Gets raped All the sympathy points in the world | Has to pay child support for 18 years Gets divorced All the alimony they could ever want | Gets fucked hard in court This is a fun game. You guys should try it.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:31 AM
14

Funny, you never see feminists fight against benevolent sexism for women. I wonder why that is...
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:37 AM
2

It's pretty expensive, more surgically extensive, and has a fairly low success rate, so may need to be done a few times. And even then it might not work. This is why the vasogel stuff being tested now is so great. A lot more easily reversed and not permanent.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:22 AM
2

sigh Fine zip
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:55 PM
13

Zimba's Law. Laws which are named after people are significantly more likely to be utter bollucks.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:43 AM
7

It also excludes clit and nipple rubbing. It's a shittily written definition, which is written with the same kind of mindset that says rape only occurs when there's penetration.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 07:38 PM
39

I don't really view segregation as an achievement.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:25 PM
2

I'm all for not forcing men into being the manly man provider protector role, but can we stop with the SJW level bullshit like this?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 11:11 AM
1

And I've never met a feminist who claimed prostitution wasn't rape. So my anecdotal evidence cancels out yours. Neener neener.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:42 AM
1

Meh. Seems to just be the counterpart of the old "What do you tell a woman with 2 black eyes" joke.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 10:38 AM
5

And in swoops the White Knight! Here he comes to save the daaaay!
/r/MensRights17/11/13 10:35 AM
3

No one should be shamed for their preferences. You're absolutely right. I prefer 15 y.o. girls. It's total bullshit that people try to shame me for it.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 07:24 AM
0

Holy shit. How's the view from up there on your high horse? Pretentious cunt, much?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:51 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1qbpag/husband_bear_fan_and_wife_packer_fan_make_game/
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:58 AM
-1

That's feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:46 PM
0

You don't seem to know what that phrase means. You mentioned the shrieking of victimblaming, and I brought into an instance where someone is labeled as a victimblamer. Not to mention that this describes it oh so perfectly.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:35 PM
2

Because us asking them politely to stop treating all men as rapists has worked out so far, right?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:27 PM
1

Tell that to Thunderf00t. Educating people on how to avoid situations is not victim blaming.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:23 PM
0

Aron's been hard into feminism for a while. Matt D used to be much more objective in his viewings, but ever since he hooked up with his feminist wife, he's been pretty brain washed. Here's a nice little clip of Aron saying a male victim of rape is actually the aggressor. He gets called out on it, and below is his response to it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDal8b6-X5o#t=23m30s A section from Aron's response: Far too often happens that fathers might molest their daughters. When that tragedy …
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:24 PM
-2

So, you're a horrible person, just like the cunt in this situation. Got it. Thanks for clearing that up for us.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:55 AM
0

He popped in the other thread that's going on about this to say a few words.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:05 PM
-1

From my understanding, it's handled like how King Solomon would.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:12 AM
1

Spot on. Not much to argue with there.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 07:59 PM
11

how SAD it is that we still live in a society that makes women feel like they have no other way to feed their children than to "date" someone just for money. Fathers are able to work to take care of their kids...why arent mothers afforded this opportunity? Proof that we are still stuck in a hegemonic culture Apparently, women are forced to want a sugar daddy and this is oppression of women because Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 10:51 PM
2

And also what THEY want to do, as well.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:53 PM
1

Good luck having anyone not just close the lid on the guy the second they see 'arrested for rape' and looking further.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 07:36 AM
1

he was told he was charged with possession of a firearm And their evidence is a picture a 4 year old girl drew. ... I'm at a loss for words.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:24 AM
3

Where did I say any fallacy? Show me.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:43 PM
2

I was just mocking your hypocrisy, so you can shut the fuck up with this "your comment is analogous" shit. I'm not making any comments on the subject one way or the other.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:30 PM
4

It was posted when 'Merica was sleeping. Give it time.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:30 PM
5

... wat...? Lots of issues existed since the dawn of time and will continue to exist. But don't you dare name one of them, because then that would be so irrational and such a fallacy!
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:28 PM
2

Yeah, 'cause I can read sky blue text on a light grey background so easily...
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:27 PM
17

Women have the ability to just drop an infant off at a safe haven, completely walking free from any obligation. Men should be able to do the same.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/13 07:17 PM
57

She said that in 1982. I doubt any feminist in such a position would ever say such a thing today.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/13 07:15 PM
3

Nope. She's just enthusiastic about her sexuality.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:30 PM
7

Parthenogenesis in humans would be the biggest news in biology since DNA. It's pretty safely discounted.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/13 08:24 AM
2

:( Now I shall never know...
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 05:51 AM
6

I'd love to hear their official response to this.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:04 AM
-1

It's not talking about the choices women do choose, it's about what choice are available. So please shut the fuck up with Not All __ Are Like That.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:13 AM
3

The image isn't about contraception, it's about what rights and obligations the individuals have after conception. It's about how "the best interests of the child" is always parroted to make men responsible, but is disallowed when it's about women.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:11 AM
6

That's pretty much the point of non-medically necessary abortions.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:12 PM
-2

It takes less time and fewer resources to replace a child than to replace an adult. Adults first, we can always just make new children.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:24 AM
-3

You have to prove they are a victim before you get to call them a victim. Until then they are an alleged victim.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:34 AM
-1

human memory is actually so bad that it's totally believable for someone to falsely accuse without having a guilty mind Yep. Which is why I support all cases that come down to just he-said-she-said be thrown out.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:28 AM
-2

Because they're bad journalists. Haven't you been paying attention to the media? They suck at journalism these days.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:17 AM
-1

And there are cases where the "victim" isn't really a victim and that no crime was ever committed against them. Which is the point of the post, that the "victim" is actually an alleged victim until proven to be a victim. Hell, even a murder victim is an alleged murder victim until it is proven that they were murdered. Ever watch Dexter? He doesn't show up and assume it's a murder, he does his investigation and doesn't declare cause of death until he can sufficiently prove it.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:14 AM
6

It's one thing to use the virtual reality program to play a game, it's another to record playing that game, and then post it online. [etc.] I get that you like strawmanning what I wrote, it's a favorite of, well, everyone, but do you not know how to read even what you write?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:38 PM
0

But Super Mario Bros. came out in 1985.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:34 PM
8

Welp, time to arrest everyone on Twitch.tv. Those Let's Play'ers on YouTube; terrorists.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:18 PM
-2

And if they rename the ears to gills we would all have gills. Naming it the same doesn't mean it is the same.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:04 AM
-1

The Skene's gland, also known as the paraurethral gland, found in females, is homologous to the prostate gland in males. Meaning, it's not a prostate gland.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:29 AM
4

women can get prostate cancer You should send a write up of this to a medical journal, you could probably win a nobel prize in medicine.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:05 AM
4

So, if we follow that train of 'logic', we shouldn't allow people to have a child unless the parent(s) is deemed financial responsible, since we're requiring that a child be adequately cared for. And if a parent(s) becomes unable to adequately provide, the parents doctor or medical insurance should be held financially liable, since they're also a party to allowing the child to come to be. Since you seem to think that women shouldn't be held solely accountable for their own actions. Unless you th…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 11:32 AM
7

Then if they become unable to support the child the sperm bank's insurance pays them money. The fuck? The woman receiving the sperm should be the last transaction in that relationship. Full stop. Why should the sperm bank be held accountable for a child that a woman unilaterally decided to have? The sperm bank isn't a parent, you don't take it to court for fucking child support. Seriously, I would love to hear how you rationalize that the sperm bank should pay for the upbringing of the child.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 10:29 AM
9

Just don't donate your sperm in England, they'll make you pay child support for that spawn.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:34 AM
1

Someone forgot to check their privilege.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 07:00 PM
1

Someone doesn't know the difference between a comparison and an analogy...
/r/MensRights06/09/13 06:59 PM
-1

Ohh look, another dumbass parroting NAFALT and No True Feminism.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 06:57 PM
1

My guess is that the reported number is something officially from the Pentagon, and the 26k number is something they pulled out of the writer's ass.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 09:27 PM
-1

Weinstein demanded to know how often she lies — “at least once a day?” — and whether she “felt like a ho” the morning after the party. Perfectly reasonable things to ask. If the court is just going to boil it down to a he-said-she-said case, the accusers reliability is paramount. And we here all know how easy it is for a woman to not only say, but get away with, saying it was rape the next morning because she felt bad about it. the process is “much more favorable to the accused” than a civilian …
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:56 PM
1

it was consent to be choked, but not to the point of unconsciousness. Man, fuck that bullshit excuse. Some things in life have inherent risk associated with them. If you agree to the thing, you agree to the risk. "Wanna go for a hike?" falls down and scrapes knee "I consented to a hike, not a fall! I'm suing!"
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:17 PM
1

a drunk woman cannot give consent for anything I've been floating a new idea for a few weeks. I want to know what others think of it. So, right now we have it so that if a drunk woman wants to have sex, and then someone complies then that's rape. So if we apply this feminist logic to it, and especially with that above quote, then giving a girl a ride in your car should be considered kidnapping. Hell, taxi services are kidnapping women left and right. If a woman can't consent to anything, how can…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:23 PM
1

Each state has it's own budget, since they get different amounts of funding from each state. So yeah. It depends on where you live for that.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:54 AM
9

Which she said seconds after saying that they should doxx people to threaten their livelihood and homelife. Which received nods of agreement from the panel.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:55 AM
31

Wow. Talk about "How to spot a con artist". "If I don't get to keep at least half of his money when I get bored with him in a few years, I don't even want to bother."
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:45 AM
6

Planned Parenthood usually does it on the cheap, or even free. Check in on them.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:33 AM
2

The amount of leading the witness cops do to kids, and how insanely susceptible to it they are, is insane. Innocent people are in jail right now based solely on the "eye witness" account of a little kid who the cops pushed toward one specific outcome.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:22 PM
1

A young teen having sex with someone older: Not legally culpable. A young teen doing literally anything else: Legally culpable. I try to put myself in the mindset of the prudes, and I still can't understand this one.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:14 PM
2

Seriously. How many kids are losing their virginity at like 13-15? A shitload. Whelp, I guess half the fucking population must cry themselves to sleep at night from the trauma they voluntarily went through, right? Yeah, that must be the case.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:10 PM
0

The strawman is that people try to make it out that that would be the case, which is retarded. If someone doesn't want to come forward because they're too stupid to understand how evidence works, that's their problem. Also, the fuck are you smoking? Where the fuck did you read into that? If there's no evidence, there's no evidence for which to charge a crime based on. If there's a teapot between Earth and Mars, but we can't detect it, just because we have no evidence for its existence doesn't me…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:28 AM
4

I could imagine a situation where... Then she'd be a fucking idiot. Punishing false claims is done under the same circumstances as any other crime; when they can be proven. Not having evidence is not having evidence, it's not evidence of a false claim. I'm so tired of the strawman you presented. People try to present it as if it's bulletproof, and they don't even realize how dumb of a strawman it is. But how do you prove false accusation? Again, the same way you prove any other crime. You start …
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:02 PM
2

What we really need to do is teach people not to play Grand Theft Auto. That'll solve that whole murder thing.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:09 PM
2

Wait, I thought that in the feminist mindset just a female saying she was raped was sufficient evidence. How does he work that one out in his head?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:00 PM
4

If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator. Pretty much sums up all of these SRS, SJW, and A+theism types, doesn't it.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:56 PM
8

Chill out. It's called satire. Did you read the article? She wants the guy to undergo "anti-oppression training" and give free haircuts to women. This thing is dripping with radfem irony.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:59 AM
0

Well, his reading comprehension is accurate in this case. So you can shut your troll mouth now.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:38 PM
0

Some of us have a decent level of reading comprehension. You, not so much.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:30 PM
1

Get what your S.O. likes. Isn't that the point? For instance, my S.O. really likes a specific (non-diamond) gem, so that's what I have in mind if I ever go to get something with a gem in it. Your GF just likes generic and bland. =P
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:12 AM
1

Technically, a diamond ring is for engagement (way to go, jewelry industry marketing team!). It's a gold ring (just the band) that is for marriage.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:09 AM
1

Damn. Those Canadians are ruthless.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:06 AM
2

Doing tedious research now. Will update if there's progress. Edit: Here ya go. Took a little while. It didn't show up in my comments history for whatever reason. Time in question is 23:30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDal8b6-X5o#t=23m30s A section from Aron's response: Far too often happens that fathers might molest their daughters. When that tragedy occurs, it sometimes happens that the assailant also blames the victim. It NEVER happens the other way around. The idea that Lot was innocently…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:41 PM
3

I used to like AronRa, too, but then in one of his lectures he turned the story of Lot on its head, saying that Lot actually molested his daughters. Whereas the book really says that Lot's daughters raped him by getting him so drunk he didn't realize he was having sex with them. I called him out of it, and people (including Aron) basically called me a rape apologist. It's like, if you're going to straight lie through your teeth like that to push your feminist agenda, I'm over it. Edit: Video in …
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:15 AM
3

Being childfree; yeah. The /r/childfree sub? Fuck those psycho assholes.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:35 AM
-1

Too ugly to rape.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 01:54 AM
3

I fucking hate this. So fucking much. May as well say that not immediately locking the accused up and throwing away the key is a slap in the face of victims, because holding a trial means that you don't completely believe the 'victim' and are calling them a liar. I want the justice system to work. Fuck me, right?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 01:53 AM
9

Is that some kind of porn acronym, maybe for White, Big Booty?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 08:46 AM
0

Where's the hate or personal attack? Since when is telling someone to shut up a personal attack? Stop being a delicate little flower that can't be exposed to anything even slightly negative, maybe? I see shit like this at least once a week and I'm so tired of the elitist attitude like this in this sub.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:04 PM
-2

Shut the fuck up. You're not a mod. Stop trying to talk all high and mighty like you fucking created this place.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:52 AM
0

Well, what I said wasn't about logic, it's about the facts of reality. Kinda like you can't have a spherical cube. I like how you close with an explanation about how close minded you are that you can't even be confronted with differing views of a matter. Truly, a class act.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:06 PM
0

Rational. Feminist. Pick one. If someone's rational, they're not going to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:59 PM
2

You'll also note that along with having little power, they had even littler responsibility/duty/obligation/whathaveyou.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:54 PM
-6

radical feminists (who overpower rational ones now) As if to imply there's such a thing as a rational feminist?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:01 AM
11

You don't know very much about the Middle Ages, do you? Miss that year of 8th grade history?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:00 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMfMELK4bjc
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:48 AM
-1

Cry more, whiny white knight.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:45 AM
12

Hmm... So that's what Gangnam style is. Interesting. ;)
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 06:27 AM
9

Was just listening to an old AVfM Radio show where they talked about something relating to this. How when women are the perpetrators they are almost never referred to as the abusers, they "mistreat" not "abuse". And how when women kill off their partner they like to use some third party to be their proxy (hitman, the new boyfriend), or they just use the state to haul him off. Not to mention women frequently get off scott-free when doing these kinds of things, skewing the numbers even further. (a…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:45 AM
4

Show me the large feminist group that actively campaigns to remove the privileges women have, then maybe I'll give a second thought to the bullshit whine of "but feminism is just about equality".
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:42 AM
6

3. They claim to want equality, but expect special treatment. Equal Right Amendment - Hayden Rider Provision The provisions of this article shall not be construed to impair any rights, benefits, or exemptions now or hereafter conferred by law upon persons of the female sex. What's that you say about "equality"?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:52 PM
8

That's because it's easy to cover up and find a replacement baby, as most babies look alike.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:00 AM
1

Those aren't concessions, those are just things you agree with.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:26 PM
1

I say it's fine to point out the double standard in these kinds of cases (I'm so all for that), but I think when it comes to statutory cases we should just try to change the system altogether. I say just make the AoC for statutory rape purposes 15, and have a Romeo and Juliet clause of +/- 3 years, and be done with it.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:23 PM
1

Shoo troll, don't bother me.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 09:05 AM
1

What you provide isn't constructive points of view, they're just antagonistic trolling. Piss right the fuck off.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 08:15 AM
-1

A better analogy for modern feminism, I do not know.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:11 AM
1

What about the gals who do the ol' squat'n'squirt? Where they don't even sit on it. They would probably prefer the seat to be up.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:09 AM
7

Since when is identifying differing tendencies between the genders misogyny? Misogyny is the hatred of women. Where's the hatred in that post? You may as well say he's being misandrist, too, since he's noting a difference of men as well. Like the other guy said, cry moar, sexist.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:08 AM
5

Bad example. Actually, it's partially his fault, too. You're supposed to check to see if it's clear to cross the intersection. He didn't do it. Another scenario. Going 65 mph on a 65 mph limit highway. You go to lane change, but only look directly to the side (no back angle at all). Some dude goes to pass you. You side swipe him. Sure, the dude shouldn't have been there (speeding), but you didn't do your lane change inspection properly. So you're both at fault.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:06 AM
6

You're being a condescending cunt. Calm down.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:00 AM
5

Maybe, but I'm not going to stare at the broken clock and cheer for it being right twice a day. The broken clock can just go fuck itself.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:02 PM
-4

Ohh. My. Gaaaawd. Shut the fuck with with that. Everyone knows how generalizations work. Only pedantic assholes read generalizations as "every x ever does y". We here in Sane-ville shall continue to understand how generalizations work and how to read and use them. Are you going to go comment on /u/IAmTheBauss's comment "We shouldn't be bashing women." And be all "How dare you say we can't bash any woman. What about the ones who deserve it?" No? Not going to do that? Just going to be selective ab…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 12:15 AM
31

Attention all: /u/CormacAndroid is an anti-MRA troll. Their post history in /r/MensRights is almost entirely antagonistic, and they also post to SRS (shocker, I know). RES tag as you wish, gentlemen, and move along.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 12:08 AM
1

The absolute only reason I would consider the "no dudes" rule to be okay would be because she doesn't want to confuse the kids with a guy being around who they might mistake and misinterpret as a father figure. And maybe to ensure the kids' dad doesn't feel like the guy would be seen as a father figure. etc. But since the kids are only there on the weekends, that kind of implies the kids will be with the dad on the weekdays, and it's doubtful the kids would forget their dad over a weekend. So, y…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:47 PM
0

Hell. Don't give a reason. Just state: Children will be around on weekends. Must clean up after yourself. Whites Only. You get across all of the information necessary without sounding racist. FTFY. If you can see how one is okay, but the other is not, you're a sexist.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:39 PM
1

C is not a good reason for that.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:31 PM
29

Warning: Don't bother trying to have a rational discussion with /u/Grapeban, she's an /r/againstmensrights troll.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:56 PM
3

I say we start appropriating Mother's Day in retaliation to piss off these kinds of people. "Amen. Only need to change the toilet paper roll every other month, instead of twice a week."
/r/MensRights17/06/13 12:50 PM
1

Fuck you. You don't tell me what to do. /r/firstworldanarchists edit: for the lazy
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:14 AM
3

It's possible to just be apathetic, and not give a shit about the whole thing.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:50 AM
1

trying to write insightful, clarifying commentary on important developments and investigative reports on social issues. You don't know much about the state of journalism these days, do you? /beingfacetious It's not just the opinion sections that have fallen to shit.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:31 AM
3

The University of Connecticut is now being sucked into that rhetoric because it changed its Husky sports logo from a cute puppy-like figure to the realistic face of a Husky dog. But one self-described feminist has generated media waves by claiming the new logo is a “menacing, pro-rape symbol” that conjures up “images of sexual assault, will intimidate women and empower a rape culture.” Yeah, why is anyone still taking campus feminists seriously? They're beyond a joke at this point.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:52 AM
4

The only way things can change is through rational, unemotional debate. The hell you say! Have you ever seen someone try to have such a discussion with your average fem? They do not remain rational and unemotional for long. I recall a nice gent trying to have a rational discussion at UoT a few months ago. Remember how that turned out?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:52 PM
7

I move to actively oppress blatant sexist and self-proclaimed feminist ally Wil Wheaton. He is a sexist, racist, super-privileged piece of shit. http://stfuwilwheaton.tumblr.com/ Sheesh. What do they have against The Wheaton?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:45 PM
3

And they say you guys have no sense of humor. Hohoho! Good one, old chap!
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:25 PM
-1

Facebook statuses: Hundreds and hundreds of millions. Facebook statuses they cherry-picked: A couple of dozen. Wow. Such rampancy. That 'Unfriend' feature still exists. Do these whiny cunts have nothing better to do than piss and moan over some facebook pages? I could go about and cherry pick some anti-male, or anti-white, or anti-chinese posts. OMG! Look! They're oppressing me!
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:23 PM
-4

You're absolutely correct. You need to read something before you can dismiss it. I read your entire comment before I just dismissed it as poppycock.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:02 PM
0

Because when you're trying to complain that someone/something is breaking the rules, you need to actually say who/what it is, and show where they are doing that rule breaking. For example, if I were to say /u/Grapeban is posting CP under multiple accounts, I kind of need to show where that's happening to get any traction. And if I were to write an article detailing /u/Grapeban's moderation of a subreddit where he and others post images of the sex slaves they keep chained up, I should probably pr…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:01 PM
1

Sounds like somebody has no sense of humor. Did you even pay attention to the points he was making, or just immediately scoff the whole thing off?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:08 PM
11

God you're an idiot. He's not an MRA. He's a satirist who uses a slightly jaded, old drunk dude persona to make fun of people for the stupid shit they do/say.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:31 AM
0

I thought the exact same thing when I read that. Unfortunately, the only people to abuse that system would be the whiny sjw-types who know they can get away with it if they scream 'victim' enough.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:40 AM
3

What do you have against horse shoes? What's on page 3 that's so damning? Everyone should know how to cook and iron, these are basic life skills that every ought to know and do. One gal says she needs feminism because she likes to bake, some others say they need it because they don't like to cook. These are opposing issues and goes to show how feminism is being warped to everything under the sun, to the point where it may as well include nothing.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:15 PM
16

You should tell the server that you'll be having separate checks at the very start before you order anything. That way it's clear to both the date and the server that you'll only be paying for yourself. This not only makes it easier for the server, but it also announces to the server that you won't be paying for their share, so that if the date tries to dump their share onto you, you're not stuck with it, since the server knows you're not claiming responsibility for it.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/13 12:36 AM
5

Like I said I'm not implying that this wasn't deserved, I just wish it wasn't necessary. What part wasn't necessary? Her going to jail? Making the false claim? Her being punished is a consequence of her making the false claim. Nah shit the false claim wasn't necessary. There's hardly a punishable crime that is necessary. The Boston bombing wasn't necessary, but you'll be hard pressed to find a handful of people to say it shouldn't be punished. It's almost as if you're trying to say punishments s…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:18 PM
1

What was that, like a, double-double-double negative? My brain hurts now.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:19 AM
7

So, women shouldn't be expected to die for their country if need be, but only men?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:07 AM
5

He'd probably be arrested for stealing it from the mother, to be quite honest. Wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:06 AM
2

You're a male. Now, go do your duty and be disposable. We females shan't dare be expected to give a shit about protecting anything.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:03 AM
90

This is absolutely the most perfect response to that stupid ass poster I can think of.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:49 PM
1

I see. I think it's kind of funny that in the /r/SRSSucks thread you defended the length of the post as you trying to be as concise as possible, and in this thread people are pointing out places you aren't concise enough.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:24 PM
6

/u/MittRomneysCampaign ?? Or you're just stealing his material, claiming it as your own. This was posted by him to /r/SRSSucks over a week ago.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:02 PM
11

When the radiologist no longer asks if there’s any chance you’re pregnant. Every radiology department I've ever seen will always ask every female over the age of like 6 if there is a chance they are pregnant, and most ER's actually do urine tests before sending them over. Yes, even 75 year olds. When the cashier at the movie theater, glancing indifferently at your gray roots, suggests you might want the senior discount How dare they offer to save me money! I know many-a frugal people who would g…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:58 PM
-3

The guy is probably just used to km/h, where doing 98 is fairly slow (about 61 mph). "Why's this cop giving me shit? I was only going 98."
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:03 PM
1

Try having a verbal altercation with a parking enforcer while brandishing a box cutter. Time how long until a police officer arrives to arrest you.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:16 PM
0

Being transphobic would be saying... blah blah blah. That is transphobia. The fuck you say? No it fucking isn't. People really need to learn what the -phobia suffix means and how to apply it. And then the irony got red-hot. "Calling it a phobia only trivializes the word..."
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:29 AM
4

At 6:50... Holy shit. "If someone says it's rape later, that was rape" JtO says, "If two people have sex, and one of them later regrets it..." Chapped lip fedora guy says, "Then it wasn't consensual!" Wow. People actually said that? In public? Unless I just heard them wrong. It's possible. It was difficult to hear them over the red-headed banshee. And at the end, "Why are you obsessed with fraudulent rape claims?" "What are you doing for actual rape victims?" ... OHH! Won't someone please think …
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:48 AM
0

Kind of funny to see all the idiots. I think maybe the old guy was half-way not an idiot, but, wow, all idiots. None of the people on the 'against preacher' side could complete a single coherent line of thought. And then the preacher goes on to do some Ray Comfort Way of the Master Pascal's wager towards the end.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:09 AM
0

Yeah fuck you Joe Rogan for having a different opinion who do you think you are, thinking differently and shit
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:04 AM
1

Wow. That's brilliant. I'mma steal that.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:01 AM
1

Nature doesn't give a shit about your mental maturity. As long as you can survive long enough to reproduce, that's good enough for nature. As the saying goes, old enough to bleed, old enough to breed.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:59 AM
3

That's a pretty shitty idea of doxxing. If a person puts out information about themselves on the internet, and others find it, that's not doxxing. You have a rather low-bar definition.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:50 AM
0

So, being expected (and/or forced) to be the ones to do all the back-breaking work, to go off and die in wars, and to die in defense of others, I guess that doesn't count for anything, ehh? But, ohh, the poor womynz! We need to recognize them as the oppressed. It gets half-credit. Loses 3 points in the first half, though.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:45 AM
1

What does this say about who is right? Ad hom's say dick-all about who is right.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:51 PM
4

Don't tell me what to do. /r/firstworldanarchists
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:42 PM
4

Response to this: crickets Reverse the sexes; response to this: world-wide outrage
/r/MensRights24/03/13 01:44 AM
6

She clearly felt uncomfortable with it Part of sexual experimentation is that sometimes you'll try something you're not comfortable with. Is this shocking to you? she didn't mention any kind of consent I don't think I've ever had sex where consent was spoken; we just fucked. Show of hands: how many people have had sex where no words were spoken at any time? Yeah, I thought so. she was degraded by it Being degraded is all about perception and how a person feels about it. This also goes back to th…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:45 PM
7

If it said "as the" rather than "as a", you'd have a case, but as it stands, no, it does not imply that.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:33 PM
2

It's more accurate at showing a guilty person as not guilty than at showing a not guilty person as not guilty. Nice...
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:13 PM
2

false rape claims may be rare Stop that. Stop that right this instant. Seriously. Please use this is the future... The rate of false rape claims is entirely irrelevant. The basis of our court system is innocent until proven guilty. The crime at hand is also entirely irrelevant to this.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:08 PM
0

Can we nullify the Patriot Act, too? Because, by your definition, that was signed under duress.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:27 AM
1

The reason the prenup was thrown out though was that he had his lawyer type it up and draft it for him, but she was not given enough time to get counsel or, even if she did find counsel, for her counsel to review the prenup. She had all the time in the world. Here's how: "You're shoving this in my face? Well, either we get married without it, or the marriage is delayed until I have a chance to review it." Bam. That, and the clause saying he doesn't have to pay child support are the reason it got…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:41 PM
5

So, then, what you're saying is that the guy was forced into marriage under duress because he felt compelled to go along with the marriage because the gal's father spent some money. Seems the whole marriage, and any alimony along with it, should be thrown out as well.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:23 PM
5

Sad, but true.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:18 PM
0

Duress can be defined as having insufficient time to review, undue coercion to sign, etc. In that case, she was never under duress. Presented the day before the wedding, you say? So then she says that the wedding is delayed until she has time to thoroughly review it. That option was available to her. She chose not to take it. It may be a shitty thing to spring on someone like that, but she still went ahead with it. Or is personal accountability no longer a thing? Did she have the chance to say, …
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:16 PM
28

Well, clearly they signed that section under duress as well, and the whole thing is a wash.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:19 PM
4

I wish someone would respond to that with a picture of Bryan Cranston running a meth empire. "Man with lung cancer. Runs the entire southwestern meth cartel." Fuck yeah!
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:19 AM
1

Even this is more sophisticated marketing strategy than most of us employ. Ummm.. No. The best marketing strategy is to talk about the actual issues and the facts and figures about them. Trying to be holier-than-thou by adding the 'H' is not good marketing. I don't really see a problem with just having everybody forgetting the whole 'H' issue ever happened. Just forget about it, and carry on with lesson-learned. I don't foresee half the people dropping out because of that.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:48 PM
3

It was also an attempt to effect better marketing. Do they honestly believe there are people out there that are going to go, "well, I didn't really like the MRM, but this MHRM, now that I could really get behind."? It's sad, really, and I've actually seen people suggest that kind of thing. There's no putting the toothpaste back in the tube, but we can toss it out and get our regular toothpaste back. Just drop the whole MHRM BS, and go back to how it was.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 10:19 AM
4

Ohh, fuck that noise. part of the reason behind the inclusion of the 'H' is to communicate that the issues facing men, are issues crippling society, and therefore harming women. And this is laudable. Won't someone please think of the women!? What about the womenz? Heaven forbid we consider helping people who are men, simply because they are people. But seriously, whoever thinks like that is an asshole that needs to go away.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 03:37 AM
45

"It doesn't matter if women get raped more. It's not a problem." I wonder if that line would fly with them.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:35 AM
7

"the majority of republicans"? Really? It's 52%. Statistically, that's an even split. I was more surprised that a larger margin of dems say yes, compared to repubs. Maybe the repubs are more traditionalist white-knighting, in this case.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:51 PM
4

The child support thing is a problem. The whole rape thing is a problem. The problem with this whole thing is that there are just so many problems with it. It's like a hypercube of fucked-up'dness. There's just too many dimensions of fucked up problems going on here.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:48 PM
-2

The line just says "more". It does not say "a ton more". Even 1>0.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:54 AM
6

If even just one family breaks up over having a paternity test, that's more than if there had been no paternity tests at all. It just says "more", it doesn't say "a shitload more". Even 1>0. All the people in this thread saying that that line is a slam on women need to shut the fuck up. It's like they're pretending women never lie about the possible paternity of their kid.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:53 AM
2

tyciol's just being a grammar nazi about your wording. Saying that you can say domestic violence can be defined to include ignoring, rather than your wording of 'can be defined as'. Kinda like saying a movie can be defined to include smart phone filmography, rather than saying a movie can be defined as a smart phone movie. The first way is inclusive, meaning the definition can be one thing -plus- including something. Whereas the second one can be understood to be exclusive, meaning a movie is de…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 02:21 AM
1

All too true.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:21 PM
0

Some people were saying the link should be cross-posted. Then someone cross-posted it, and showed where it was cross-posted to. And you're saying that's brigading? Your understanding of brigading is pretty fucked in the head. Now an ad hom is a valid response to people wanting equal rights? Gotchas.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:20 AM
3

But it needs to be approved by a judge. And that is the problem. If a parent can name their child whatever the fuck they want, for whatever reason they want, without having to justify it to a judge first, any person should be able to change their legal name to whatever they want, for whatever reason they want, without having to justify it to a judge.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:42 PM
-3

One person is not a downvote brigade. One person cross-posting a link for exposure is not a downvote brigade. And by the looks of it, the majority of the posts are just ad hom's against JtO or AVfM.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:30 PM
1

Just being accused means that he's 51% likely to be guilty. Case closed.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:52 AM
2

but I feel that this "argument" (of viewing a circumcision) is null and void It's an appeal to emotion. They're often used because humans respond much more significantly to emotions than data. If a person doesn't listen to the reasoned arguments against, it's usually because they're just scoffing off facts, favoring the made up bullshit in their head. These people are more likely to respond to the appeals to emotion. Also, I didn't realize there was a "correct" way to mutilate an infant. Is ther…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:22 PM
3

While I get your point, there is one potential justifiable reason convince him otherwise. The father very well may be unlikely to use the newfound information first-hand, but he might come across a person who would. And he could educate them and have a meaningful impact. Meme spreading, and all that.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:14 PM
1

Hopes: deleted
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:32 AM
-13

Take your SRS shit out of this sub. You're an SRSer, trying to spread lies. Go away. Edit: Check out SRS totally not vote brigade this thread. This thread was linked by this same user who posted it in their domain, and they specifically requested a vote brigade.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:24 PM
1

Wow. You take reddit super seriously, don't you? Reddit is a place to be entertained, not butthurt. So that's that I do, make entertainment out of it. Reddit isn't a place I take super seriously. I'll sometimes make proper arguments, but most people aren't receptive to logic, so it gets disheartening. And, well done on the ad hom by attacking my comment history rather than actually addressing any points I made. I'm so over this. Later.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:12 AM
1

1) You kinda did. "If you favour using one tool over all others" Bam. Right there. 2) Your entire post was basically ridiculing the use of ridicule, saying to not use it to the exclusion of all others. The natural comeback is to say that sometimes it's okay. Don't use a hammer to install a wallsocket? Yeah, no shit, sherlock. I understand that there are more options. Stop being the pretentious douche in the background trying to tell others how to be. 3) I'm not talking about the amount of use of…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:24 AM
1

woosh over your head goes the joke.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:07 AM
4

Your little analogy is horribly flawed. First, I don't think anyone anywhere has ever expressed ridicule as being the only tool. Secondly, sometimes ridicule is the right tool. Third, sometimes the target of the ridicule is inconsequential, and the one doing the ridicule doesn't give a fuck if they aren't receptive, because usually ridicule is done only after the target has shown a complete unwillingness to listen to sound arguments. Example, people don't usually try to reason with WBC, they jus…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:00 AM
5

Ridicule can be used as a valid tool for showing the inanity of something.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:36 AM
-10

You will NOT interrupt our circlejerk! How dare you!! If an idea is bad, then that should be able to demonstrate that based on the merit of the idea itself. That gets done all the time. This post is just to make fun of them. This post isn't an ad hom, it's an insult. People need to learn the fucking difference.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:07 AM
8

relevant xkcd
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:04 AM
10

False. No one deserves undeniable respect.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:41 AM
3

You waited 7 hours just to post that, didn't you?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:50 PM
1

Two weeks is short? As if. I knew someone who tried to commit suicide, twice. And each time they only kept them for 48 hours. After that, they basically said, we did what's required by law, now get out, we don't want to be responsible for you.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 03:17 PM
0

But the horse was a Christmas gift!
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:12 PM
44

That would kind of be doing it wrong. The sign should not have to say that second line at all. Anyone who interprets "family" to mean "dad not allowed" is an asshole, and is helping society to decay.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 11:43 PM
3

and from what I can tell a pornographer site called reddit. Kaaay....
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:35 AM
-2

Edit: Do lift weights. That improved my erections, and I wasn't even old or out of shape. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxkP1T0FCPk#t=22s Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:23 AM
0

Ohh, shut the fuck up with your whiny self-righteous uppitiness. You can stop being a hypocrite now. You flamed others for using a naughty word, while using a naughty word yourself. What did you think would happen? People don't like hypocrites who demand censorship, but only on the others' part. Besides, cunt is merely the female version of the male slur of asshole. Personally, I try to degenderize all slurs, so people stop getting so offended over stupid shit.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:31 PM
0

No one links to anything (aside from the picture), but the comments are where the meat of it is.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:31 AM
-24

Not sure what the ad hominem attack is you're referring to. In the part you quoted, I see what can be considered an insult, but no ad homs. Edit: Wow. That downvote you gave me was such a good argument. Totally changed my perspective about the entire universe.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:34 AM
5

Don't use the a word, bro, that hurts my feels. There's no reason for it, and it just makes you look like a cunt, I mean, big meanie.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:10 AM
1

Things of note... She keeps saying "Sorry!" At one point it sounded like she was saying "sorry for not charging your phone, how stupid of me to forget". At the end when she takes a wheelchair out of a cab, she says to someone, "what are you gonna do about it, huh!?" Bystanders kept wondering what she was on. One wondered if she had just gotten dumped. Seems she might have some issue, maybe manic or bipolar. Possibly had a fight with someone, and is taking it out on the streets out of frustration…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:04 AM
4

Random question... If "feminism" is sometimes defended as being for equality for all genders, can the term "white power" be said to be for the equality for all races? I think we should try to get the ball rolling on that one.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:17 AM
30

Sad part is, there are people who actually defend that statement. True or not, people actually defend what's said in that quote. Which I think it the worst part about it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:14 AM
31

a full investigation needs to take place to determine the facts Yes, and by the local police department. The school should not be doing investigations into criminal matters. They are not a sovereign state with autonomy that gets to police itself. It's a criminal matter, and thus a police matter. If the accused is found guilty, then they get what the court decides. If the accused is found not guilty, that should be the end of it, and any action the school takes against the not guilty party is ine…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:29 AM
12

Don't get so uppity about this one. The article at least actually calls it a rape in the title. So there's that. And I would think that it's acceptable for a police officer to call any rape a 'frightening experience'. Frightening, traumatic, terrible, etc. They all seem to fit. I think the article calling it a rape is enough to not condemn it. Now, if only we can get them to call woman-on-man rape just 'rape', that'd be more impressive.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:02 PM
5

I only fuck natural blondes or redheads. Can I yell rape on a woman who dyed her hair?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:12 PM
0

The way it works is that it's only assault if the recipient perceives it as such, and any reasonable person would as well. If a person laughs off being pushed into a pool, not assault.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 07:23 PM
2

To be fair, we don't 'know' that the nurse didn't care. Actually, we do know. She has done interviews. She said she didn't care. The nurse might not... Bieber might not... Now you're just making shit up. I can make shit up, too. The nurse might have been the one to initiate the kiss. Bieber might have actually put McCartney up to it beforehand.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 07:21 PM
3

Actually, what the recipient of that action feels about it does matter. Say a person pushes another into a pool. Some random stranger might care, a friend doing it to a friend would just laugh it off. Same thing with the V-Day kiss. The guy and gal were strangers, but the gal didn't really care. From what I've heard, the Bieb did care, but just didn't make a deal about it.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:35 PM
2

It is not sexist as it is a view which can be held by any gender Remember, it's not racist for a white person to call a black person a nigger, as it is a word that can be used by any race. It's not racist to kill all the jews, as it is a view that can be held by any race.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:50 AM
-1

How can one say that all feminists are crazy? The same way one can say all dog shit sandwiches are gross. If the very thing that's being discussed is vile, it's not a generalization to say all items of such a thing are vile.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:58 AM
6

Damn. That Kavita Siewratann is a piece of work. Creates violence. Whines about not feeling safe.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:45 AM
4

I like the condensed version: Obey the law.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:44 AM
-4

3 is just being considerate. 5 is just being a responsible adult. All the others: batshit crazy.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:39 AM
1

I don't. I've seen pictures/videos of guys in mini-rallies holding up signs saying similar shit, right alongside the fems.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:27 AM
5

Not really. Clubs are about making money. The way they do that is get people in the door and buying drinks. If they're staying in business, it's because they get enough customers. So surely people are okay with the music. If she isn't, she should leave. When enough people do that, they place changes what it does so people return and it stays in business. Capitalism 101
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:22 AM
-2

STIs can be spread in a single encounter. Yes, we know that. But just like getting a DUI only takes one time driving under the influence, chances are they got a DUI because of an established pattern of driving under the influence, that they got away with until they got the DUI (STI, in the analogy).
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:10 AM
2

It's actually about people not using contraceptives. I've known teenagers who were being a bit dumb and didn't use contraception, and, oops, pregnant at 15. I've also known teenagers who weren't being dumb and decided not to fuck if they don't have contraception. This is more about people not taking responsibility for their actions. Saying, "I got pregnant at 16, it's someone else's fault for not providing contraception" is pathetic and laughable. It's the person's fault for being a bit dumb abo…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:04 PM
3

Exactly. Came here to say this. This was just a survey about peoples thoughts about a pill. That in no way can establish if trusting men to take the pill is warranted or not. The article was misleading and moot.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:17 PM
1

And what does practicing safe sex or abstaining have to do with feminism?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:06 PM
9

The sign specifically says "college's women's center". College centers are generally not about health issues. College women's centers are generally just brooding places for feminism.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:05 PM
4

The person posted a second set. Right this way, gents.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:59 PM
1

Just up/down accordingly. The people of that sub already voiced anything most decent people could say.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:18 PM
14

Great comment If that is the case, then a woman should be held to the same standard. Men are socially discouraged from hitting us because we're smaller and not as strong... but since they're not allowed to hit back, that makes the act of a woman hitting a man an attack on a defenseless person. It would be no different than hitting someone who is tied up, or kicking someone with no use of his legs. If someone can't hit you back, and you hit him, no matter how mad you are or what reason you think …
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:18 AM
-2

Yeah, you are in the wrong. The other person's first response to you was on point, and you get a stick up your ass about stupid shit.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:09 AM
3

You're absolutely right. We shouldn't lock people up for their diseases, just because they happened to do a bad thing. We need to correct this grave injustice. I say we start by letting out all those people who ever got into a bad accident while driving drunk, and someone accidentally died. They were obviously in a fragile state and were put over the edge by a cheating, despicable wife. And I also submit that we shouldn't charge people with DUI's anymore, we should send them to treatment. And le…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:18 PM
1

I still don't get it. At least with 'mouthbreather', there's some kind of connection between the term and the definition. I just don't see how the hell 'neckbeard' even means anything. (I still have no idea what the hell the word is trying to say.)
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:45 PM
1

One who lacks a romantic orientation, or is incapable of feeling romantic attraction, is known as aromantic. So, that's what we're calling psychopaths these days? Wow. This world is just depressing.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:53 PM
2

Interesting. But, WTF is "romantic orientation"? And how is that different than sexual orientation?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:45 PM
1

This is all well and good, always love me some GWW, but did you get her permission to post a PM she sent you? You don't mention that you did. You really should do that next time.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:32 PM
2

As long as DUI's exist, and no one tube-feeding the alcohol, each person is responsible for their own toxicity. It's not right that a person is held responsible in one area but not another. Either a person has responsibility across the board, or none at all.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 11:13 PM
2

I read that in Inez Wong's voice, from Futurama (Amy's mom).
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:02 AM
5

I think you misunderstand what the comic is saying. Or maybe you just didn't read it all. Here's a little snippit. Please don't misunderstand me. I'm extremely grateful for the jackpot of privilege fate awarded me when I was born a white, able, middle-class, sane, cisgendered male in the first world at the end of the 20th century. (Emphasis is the cartoonist's) He's clearly saying that those traits were an advantage, and that he would have had it worse if not for those.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:50 AM
2

Not really. That's just the first third of it. The rest is mostly about a search for identity and purpose.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:46 AM
3

The fuck does any of this have to do with devout atheists? The guy was talking about his crazy mom, and you bring up devout atheists?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:51 PM
0

A third of women in the US get C-sections and can't drive or use stairs for 6 weeks. And why is that? But, increasingly women are requesting elective Caesareans for non-medical reasons.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:41 PM
1

Wow. The fuck are you doing on /mr if you're okay with circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:11 PM
2

So? There's a big difference between cutting off thumbs and cutting off arms up to the elbow. They're still both torture.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:20 PM
2

As if one is mutilation and one isn't? Well argued. Sigh...
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:36 AM
3

What kind of bothers me about that article are the people calling her a monster for mutilating the kids genitals, yet are probably the same people who either support or are indifferent to circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:07 AM
43

That would definitely make the next Olympics more interesting.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:16 AM
7

I'm not criticizing you, I'm legitamitely curious. Why are you against murder?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:32 AM
3

How do these people not understand that by sending an innocent person to jail, that necessarily means that the guilty person went free (assuming there actually is a crime)!?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:36 AM
16

Maybe you're new here, but just to let you know, /s means that whatever preceeded it was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:21 AM
5

The point is that gayrights has little to nothing to do with atheism. Most of the gay posts on /r/atheism have nothing to do with religion or atheism, and the topic comes up in every thread. Kind of in the same way that feminism is infecting the atheism community.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:53 AM
-5

Don't forget that they are also a little bastion of feminism and gayrights circlejerking.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 12:11 AM
0

The only war that I would consider serious enough to reinstate the draft would be if the US was being invaded (or maybe one of our major allies) and we couldn't just bomb the shit out of them. Anything less than that is just optional.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:49 PM
1

ಠ_ಠ And isn't the mother is only ditching or killing the baby because it's affecting her own autonomy? A bit hypocritical to allow one to ditch it, and not the other.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:20 PM
1

So, you're pro-sexism and anti-equality. Gotchas.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:15 PM
1

opportunities here are often not taken up because people don't see the worth in educating their children, or don't particularly care to educate the women in their family Then in those cases affirmative action would do absolutely nothing. If parents don't want to send their kid to school, they won't send their kid to school. That school having a policy that group gets extra points would have zero impact on them. If I don't want a cookie, I don't want a fucking cookie. Halving the price isn't goin…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:18 PM
2

Umm... Yeah. If it's an "innocent compliment" like you said, then yes.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:56 PM
8

Feminism is an ideology, and is not capable of holding beliefs. The fuck did you just say!? That's what an ideology is! It's a set of beliefs.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:52 PM
2

What's a "rape shield", and where can I buy one? They sound fucking awesome. I consider it harassment every time someone says "bless you" to me when I sneeze, but most of the time it's an "innocent comment" that shouldn't cause any issues. Same with your "innocent compliments". Just because someone interprets something as harassment, doesn't mean it is.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:45 PM
2

This kind of shit bothers me. It seems a lot people naively think that the fucktards in the middle east will stop oppressing women, or any other group, simply by having them change that one aspect of it. No. Their fucked-upidness isn't just that they're dicks to most every group. The problem is with their culture, a lot of which comes from the religion. And women aren't exactly the only group that gets shit on. Homosexuals, atheists, blasphemers, adulterers (both women and men), men who don't ge…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:34 PM
3

Women can opt out even after birth, by simply dropping off the child at some abandonment site, or adoption where the father never even needs to know. Why can't men do the same?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:17 PM
2

an MRA loses credibility in completely denying that rape happens The fuck you say? I've never seen anyone, let alone an MRA or on this subreddit, deny that rape happens.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:29 AM
2

Also, one of the first school shootings was by a gal. A song was even made about it, "I don't like Mondays."
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:27 AM
2

Sadly, it seems skeptics (at least the big Con going ones) are the most susceptible to political correctness. Ever see the movie PCU? It's like that, but worse. It's embarrassing.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:26 PM
1

If you think that how a woman dresses is relevant to anything other than that woman If someone doesn't think that, they're an idiot. Attire is pretty important in society. Pretty sure all work places have a dress code of some sort. Pretty sure wearing a gimp suit with a strap-on isn't considered appropriate at a child's park.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:30 AM
1

Pretty much. Quote mining for little snippits to be posted at places MRA's aren't welcome to further the hivethink. There was one big example a couple months ago. The one where the guy got arrested for hitting his gf, with some ambiguity about whether it was self-defense (I think, I didn't fall too deeply into that one). There were those calling it a troll, and there were those saying that there's a guy who genuinely needs advice. Turned out to be a troll. Lots of these kinda-sorta controversial…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:34 PM
1

If you're not a troll, announce what your main account is, and then post on it as a reply to that post.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:09 AM
0

He doesn't look like a troll Yes, the OP does too look like a troll. Brand new account and has only posted in this thread. Not proof, but usually huge red flags for a troll.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:07 AM
1

Brand new account. Has only posted in this thread. Gonna have to call troll on this one and just leave it at that.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:03 AM
1

Yeah, it's funny. But only if it was in a comedy movie or something. In real life it's fucked up. And that asshole of a gal should have been arrested for unprovoked assault and batter.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:55 AM
2

I'm reminded of the South Park episode where all the men start having gay sex to get rid of the future-people. Come on, guys! We all just need to start having gay sex with eachother!
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:46 AM
7

That's pretty retarded. And the IOC is being sexist because some country is less sexist then they are? What? it's hard to equivocate the plight of the male rhythmic gymnast with that of a Saudi woman who finally earned the right to compete in the Summer Games Yeah, one has the right to compete, the other doesn't because they black-listed the sport. Women in (let's face it) islamic asshat countries who would be prevented from competing would be because of the country, not the IOC. It has nothing …
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:33 AM
-1

So, a good parent is a dead parent? I would think that a living parent would be better for the kid.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:03 AM
0

Well, aren't you a friendly person. I suppose that's expected, being a pope, and all.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:08 AM
-1

A dead parent doesn't make for a very good parent.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:49 PM
1

So, people are criticizing his actions that occurred as a result of a traumatic experience. Yep, sounds like victim blaming to me.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:47 PM
3

How is it not? Anyone in that theater was a victim. People are crucifying the dude for not have his head screwed on tight.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:29 PM
-1

I was just continuing ChildActor's point. And yours, too. That that was a fucked up situation, and people need to chill the fuck out with all the judgement of actions that going on.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:13 PM
4

Not necessarily. Some people produce more or less of these kinds of hormones. It's possible for them to be kicked in for an extended period and at a high dose, making a person in a hyped up state for quite some time.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:10 PM
-2

So, if someone values their life over that of another, they're a self-centered prick? Fuck you.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:06 PM
1

The fuck you talking about? Almost every thread here that talks about offspring talk about blood-relationship as being pretty high up there with what determines that.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:03 PM
-1

simply for the fact that you are stronger, faster, more mentally composed Which means I have a higher priority on the 'who gets to live' list. Kids are young and can be replaced fast. An adult takes way longer to replace.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:01 PM
0

And were a random civilian with zero training, preparedness, and in street clothes, and it was like this situation the first time it happened to you? No? Didn't think so.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:58 PM
6

Adrenaline and endophines make you not think clearly. This victim blaming needs to stop right the fuck now.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:54 PM
-2

Remember, everyone, violence is always the answer.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:52 PM
-1

Maybe you should re-read the top post about tear gas being a bit confounding.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:51 PM
-4

Ugh. Do people not understand the idea of self-sufficiency? Why is the talk constantly about everyone needing to protect and take care of everyone else? How about this crazy idea of each person taking care of their own shit? This isn't some military unit that knows how to coordinate and get the back of eachother. This is a bunch of mostly young adults who were tear gassed. Their shit was fucked. Heck, even health care workers, emt's, medics, etc. know that they take care of themselves first, bec…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:49 PM
10

No. The first instinct of just about any organism is to protect the self. One can always make new offspring. Maybe you don't understand the concept of disorienting. It means you don't act in the most sensible of manners.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:41 PM
1

So, if a 19-yo gal just so happened to want to go to the park on her birthday and liked wearing fancy dresses with tiaras, they'd kick her out for looking like a Disney princess? That's pretty lame. Or some Indian guy who liked wearing vests? I fucking hate corporations sometimes most of the time all the time.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:36 PM
1

I would say your issue could fit in to the MRM, as others have said, insofar as it is about gender roles and expectations. Part of the core of the MRM is the idea that society should basically be gender-blind for the most part. This could include getting to wear what you want. Personally, I see what your doing as I see people with body/facial mods stuff. It's not my bag, but if it's yours, whatever. Have fun with that. I find it stupid and bigoted when people judge them for it (like all those, "…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:29 PM
1

Well, gals can wear a g-string at a beach. Pretty sure most guys would get fined for indecent exposure if they tried that. So there are things like that everywhere. Those things have more to do with sexuality than gender.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:17 PM
1

HAH! I love it! That always bothered me since I was a kid. Why does formal or business wear for guys have to be that annoying ass suit, but for gals they get to wear stuff they would wear to a fucking picnic at the bay? I wish there were more Richard Bronson's in the world who are like, "ya know what, fuck you guys, I'm wearing jeans to work."
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:15 PM
2

Depending on how severe you consider your body image issues, I would recommend that you check out a book called The Broken Mirror by Katharine Phillips. It's a really good read. Really gets in depth with all the reasons people have body image issues.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:11 PM
7

In the fucked up legal system that we have now, yeah, if he were also drunk and had sex with her. Which is sad.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 03:34 PM
4

That better be satire. Step 3: Instagram everything. If it ain't, that gal is beyond helping.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:45 PM
15

You're an idiot. He never said he had sex with her. He only said that her advances were approaching sexual assault.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:25 PM
1

My discussion wasn't with the the OP. It was with the idea that someone should/should not feel bad for doing some wrong. This is not a semantic debate. This is something that annoys me about society nowadays. The pushing of the idea that people shouldn't feel bad for doing bad stuff so long as they says "oops, my bad" is detrimental, and doesn't serve as a proper deterrent from doing bad stuff.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:12 PM
1

Actually, yeah, you were the one making it personal. You brought my character into it.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:07 PM
0

Guilt is the status of having committed a wrong. Shame is the emotion that typically accompanies an acknowledgment of wrong doing and/or doing harm.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:35 AM
0

You can be ashamed of your actions. You understand this, right? "I forgot to call my mom on her birthday. I feel bad. I fucked up." Not the same as "I am bad. I'm a fuck up." Same thing with OP. I'm pointing out the first line, not the second.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:10 AM
0

It's not, but it's nice that you're making it personal like some uppity elitist prick. The point I'm making is specifically towards things that result is some negative outcome. Not just some mundane lesson like learning the state capitals. Remorse is a part of the psychology of learning from one's own failings, whether you realize it or not. Ever hurt someone's feelings and feel bad about it? That's your empathy kicking in and making you feel some remorse and a bit of shame about it. Why does it…
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:06 AM
1

The change of mind/action towards the better is admirable. The harmful ideology/action should be shamed. Not necessarily the person or their character. That's part of the point of register-her.com, or that "your whatever is bad, and you should feel bad" meme. It's part of human psychology that we feel bad for doing something negative. It's there to prevent us from doing negative things.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 11:57 PM
5

You don't have to be ashamed in order to admit to a mistake, but there needs to be a certain amount of remorse and regret and whatever other synonym you want to use to provide incentive so that you actively try to not do something again. Just going "tee-hee, my bad" is not what I want to hear from a drunk driver. I want to see some remorse for previous actions. A healthy amount of shame is sometimes in order.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 11:52 PM
-7

What? No. Do be ashamed. That's the whole point of being ashamed, so you don't fucking do it again. If you're not ashamed of doing something, you're going to just do it again.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:22 PM
2

When will people understand that when it comes to education, there should be no boxes on the enrollment form for gender, race, etc.? These are things that have nothing to do with sitting in a chair and hearing a lecture.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:18 PM
1

Is that basically just saying that women fall closer to the median, and men have a wider range? If it were graphed, women would have a taller bell curve, and men would have a more mound shape to it?
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:13 PM
6

I'm so sick of all the "gender gap" crap. This wikipedia hubbub highlights it even more. Why is there a gender gap in wikipedia? Because more men than women want to become and remain active contributors. It's just that fewer women care about contributing to the combined knowledge of humanity. There's no sexism or other hogwash. It's not wikipedia's fault there aren't more women writing articles. It's the women that choose to not write articles. It's fairly apparent that the women making a fuss a…
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:03 PM
2

But how do you define what is general? Science! Hmm... But that's still iffy. Some studies say full mental maturity isn't reached until the early 20's, which doesn't really jive with a society that tries 14 y.o.'s as an adult in a murder case because "you're old enough to comprehend the consequences of your actions." Which, of course, flies in the face of 16/18 y.o. age of consent laws. And then there's nature. People have been making babies at the onset of puberty since we had uglies to bump to…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:45 PM
1

Going to work a little backwards, here... No, I don't interpret this as you attacking me personally. It's just kind of frustrating that you keep going back to things I thought I explained. Like keep saying sleeping sex is morally wrong, period, after I explain that it can be fine and dandy. Middle ground is not always the best way with this kind of thing. It usually works, but not in all cases. I'm trying to think of a good example, but I keep thinking of alcohol/drugs laws for some reason. Seem…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:07 PM
1

I've had gals tell me that waking up to sexual pleasure is enjoyable for them. They were okay with it, and even encouraged it at times. So, no, it's not morally wrong, all the time. So can you please stop spewing that narrow, puritanical mindset you can't seem to ditch? It's not cool if the person is not down with that. It's cool if the person is down with that. How do you not get this? No, I don't think pedophilia is inherently morally wrong. I don't think anything is inherently morally wrong. …
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:25 PM
1

The term "fight" loses all meaning if one person is unconscious. It's like punching a pillow. It's no longer a fight and is now just unnecessary punching. But, why are we even still talking about the fight club thing? I already shown how it's stupid, and even destroyed your own argument using it.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:15 PM
1

Well, I've never heard of a fight association that allowed you to beat someone after they're known to be unconscious, so that's kind of a dumb analogy. Pretty sure any fight club would have rules about that sort of thing. Hell, even in Fight Club they do. That's part of the whole "consenting beforehand" thing. You establish rules and boundaries.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:19 PM
1

Having absolute power over someone's unconscious body? You know there are fetishes surrounding this very point, right? On both sides of the action. Humans can be into some kinky shit. But like I said, there's an agreement beforehand, and either party is allowed to say "stop" at any time, what's your beef with it? Heck, choking someone is generally considered a bad thing, but there are some fetishes for it. So long as people use a safe word (or gesture, in that case), why are you sticking your no…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:12 PM
2

Simply to try to illustrate that 1) saying "yes" to something is different than truly understanding and being willing to do it (giving consent) Then in that case medical consent is impossible in most cases and should be illegal. There's no way for the average person to be able to give proper consent to a surgery. They haven't been through medical school. They can't possibly consider everything and be able to understand all the pro's and con's of each decision that they're making. Side note: Abou…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 12:20 PM
1

because it treats all teenage boys and adult men as potential child molesters FTFY
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:14 PM
2

The entire thinking behind letting false rape accusers who come clean off the hook is that what we (should) care about most is getting the victim out of jail and mitigating the affect on his life as much as possible. Then what you're teaching people is that it's okay to lie and ruin someone's life. If there's no consequences for lying, there's no incentive to not lie in the first place. In your system, there's apparently incentive to lie. Imagine you had the power to send someone to prison, anyt…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 07:28 PM
1

The benefits should be the same as with someone who confesses to any crime; a slightly lenient sentencing. Unless you have a better idea. What kind of benefit do you think there should be? A monetary reward? Throw a party in their honor?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:04 PM
3

Like I said in a different post, the standards of evidence should be a little higher than "he raped me". Proper investigation should be done. Should the police/investigators look upon a rape claim with suspicion, then? Absolutely. It's because of that old fashioned idea of 'innocent until proven guilty'. Someone makes a criminal charge, it's investigated. You don't just take a person's word for these things. Saying we shouldn't prosecute people for coming forth about a false claim is like saying…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:03 PM
3

Or maybe something else. I know it's a crazy idea that might never work, but hear me out for a second. How about we actually do a proper investigation? I know, silly, right? Maybe we could try to do something a little bit more thorough than just asking a woman, "it was this guy who raped you, wasn't it?" Who knows, maybe the lying fucks can be found out before people get tossed in jail. Then we punish the living shit out of the lying scumbags and make an example out of them so this shit can stop…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:18 AM
10

Or, we could, ya know, actually punish people who lie about something so serious as this, so people stop doing it in the first place.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:10 AM
2

Taking responsibility and showing remorse SHOULD mean something. And during sentencing, it usually does. But the person still committed a crime and should be convicted and punished. This gal lied, conned the system, and got a monetary settlement she knows she didn't deserve. Hell, even insurance fraud is illegal, and punished. She did essentially the same thing for the money, and she had someone put in jail for 5 years.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:08 AM
3

You don't understand the image, it seems. One of the apologetics circumcision people used is "it happens when they're babies, the don't even remember it." How do you not understand this? The picture isn't equating the two. It's trying to point out the fucked-upidness of that apologetic by using it with date rape. Some people may see it as crass or inappropriate, but it's being used to get people to not mutilate babies. If being a little bit of a jerk is more of a faux pas to you than mutilating …
/r/MensRights27/05/12 02:33 PM
4

Did you even read the OP? It was a pathetic attempt at being reasonable, but ended up being completely condescending. There was no respect in it. The person clearly misses the reason circumcision is brought up at all. something that there is a lot of good debate about (circumcision) Are you fucking kidding me? "A lot of good debate?" Ummm... No. There is no good debate about circumcision. such trivial issues as circumcision Trivial? I almost feel like calling date rape trivial just to be an ass …
/r/MensRights27/05/12 12:42 PM
1

I vehemently disagree with your notion that circumcision is not as bad as date rape. That being said, I don't feel like my being date raped was so much of a bad thing. Everything works fine down there. See how that works? See how fucked up that is? Yeah, just as fucked up as what you said.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 12:34 PM
1

I don't even care if it's a repost. I love it so much every time.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:11 PM
0

Wow. You really -are- an idiot. Factory2 said: But you sure do seem to love the taste of his ass... And you interpret that as analingus? Are you an idiot, or just looking to take offense at the slightest thing and be a troll? Factory2 was clearly referring to kissing ass, sucking up, etc.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:01 AM
1

Usually that sentence ends with "teaching us that beastiality is okay."
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:14 PM
57

I feel like these are so over-the-top ridiculous that it has to be satire. Like, if this was for stopping people from shooting others, one might be, "remember, if someone waves 'hi' to you, you shouldn't shoot them in the face."
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:09 PM
-4

It's a sex organ. You're a putz if you can't recognize that.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:42 PM
1

Well, it IS craigslist. Haven't you ever browsed r/wtf and seen all the craigslist stuff about wanting a very specific someone to do a specific duty?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:46 AM
80

The sexual devaluing and dehumanizing of males is so cute! /s
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:44 AM
1

What if she said she was lying about recanting the lie, and was like, jk, he actually raped me... lol, jk, I'm just fucking with you. Trololol"
/r/MensRights04/04/12 02:04 PM
3

I think that modifying "they/their" to also be singular, rather than the old way of thinking it to be only plural, would be the best. The "he/she" "he or she" "s/he" is just stupid and sounds horrible.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:06 AM
1

Personally, I'm generally okay with how it is now in some of the more liberal states; okay up to the end of the second trimester, beyond that, only in specific circumstances, like the fetus is dead, anyways, etc. But I'm going to add a bit that I tend to agree with regarding where it touches on Men's Rights. A Voice for Men pointed out something that I found a lot of sense with. If a woman is able to legally disavow herself of all responsibility for a fetus/baby by way of abortion or adoption, w…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter