_---_-_-_ Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	"6 foot hunk ex-pro rugby league player" marries partying female flight attendant in her mid thirties with a man in every port Oh I wasn't talking about them as two parts to a whole, but as two entirely different kinds of status. One based on what we would generally perceived as status (socioeconomic or otherwise) and another based on ability to climb, not climb in relative to the first status, but in relative to any social heirarchy (dominance or trust eliciting behaviour). Of course, this would require a hormonal or otherwise innate explanation to "charisma", which I don't have.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/15 06:47 AM
1	"6 foot hunk ex-pro rugby league player" marries partying female flight attendant in her mid thirties with a man in every port If you are saying status like a white collar status I would agree with you. Again, just throwing shit at the wall, but what if it was like achieved status is beta (she only gains from it if she is known to be his partner) while ability to gain status (natural charisma) is perceived as alpha?	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/15 06:10 AM
1	"6 foot hunk ex-pro rugby league player" marries partying female flight attendant in her mid thirties with a man in every port Yes, I suppose I agree with you having reservations about that. I suppose I want to say it's a spectrum. You can maximise on your alpha traits, but at some point you're going to be capped by your genetics. Also, I personally think status gets misused a lot when it comes to AF/BB. I think there is beta status (ie status she benefits from by being in an LTR with the man) such as being a doctor. While there is alpha status (such as other men supplicating to you, or women throwing themselves at you …	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/15 05:16 AM
1	"6 foot hunk ex-pro rugby league player" marries partying female flight attendant in her mid thirties with a man in every port Okay, we are arguing two different points. An alpha can be born through hormonal hacking, yes. But learning to "act" alpha does not make one alpha, as the entire purpose of alpha fucks is to secure superior genetics alpha must have a genetic basis, it must have a biological grounding as a concept to make sense. This is why women are disgusted by false alpha's, because they lack the genetic basis required to qualify and through his deception he has placed her genetic legacy at risk by compromisin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/15 05:03 AM
1	"6 foot hunk ex-pro rugby league player" marries partying female flight attendant in her mid thirties with a man in every port If the doctor was beta, he would have never left All men possess some aspect of alpha and beta, they are traits men possess related to S&R value (generally androgen driven masculine traits) vs Provisioning & PRotection traits (ironically often caused by a lack of S&R value). Besides that, this statement is a little presumptuous, we know nothing about the doctor other than she was attracted to him for his status and money. That he left has nothing to do with being alpha. Alpha describes desirable…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/15 01:21 AM
1	"6 foot hunk ex-pro rugby league player" marries partying female flight attendant in her mid thirties with a man in every port A better analogy would be that the wall is to women as the physical wall is to football players. Not sure why he was even contesting the walls existence, it's so blatantly obvious that a woman's beauty is tied to her youth. I can understand BPers rejecting RP thought, but to simply deny that a wall exists and that it's different for each gender? Seriously some weird delusion going on there. This fits in perfectly with AFBB. No it doesn't. AF/BB refers to a cad/dad mating strategy for women. Your…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/15 01:00 AM
2	BP/PPers: How will you raise your sons to avoid needing to resort to TRP? Thanks muchly dude.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/15 12:02 AM
1	The front in the marriage debate is poly Did you learn how to fear? Or did you learn what to fear? I'll leave it at that as I'm not interested in having a debate on nature vs nurture, it's a false dichotomy. If you're genuinely interested in cognitive neuroscience have a quick google. I think you might like it as long as you have a basic understanding of biological chemistry.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 01:05 PM
1	The front in the marriage debate is poly :) Cognitive Neuroscience is about as hard as science can get baby, not of the issues like those encountered in evopsych, which I agree are there. As a neuroscientist my major area is in biological chemistry obviously, notably that of the human nervous system, so this leads me to viewing human behaviour as a field of biological enquiry, much as any other species behaviour is. So evolution must be accounted for at some point. So maybe I'm pro sociobiology through bias. While I accept a lot of cri…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 12:51 PM
1	The front in the marriage debate is poly Not sure if edit or I read wrong. Again I highlight, if you do not display traits that align with high reproductive success, you will unlikely get the other needs met on the sexual marketplace. If you do display those traits, then poly is fucking great for you! But only about 20% of males display those traits...	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 12:44 PM
1	The front in the marriage debate is poly Did I say I was an evolutionary psychologist or a cognitive neuroscientist? Or do you just not understand the difference? Anyway, it's beside the point and I don't want to get into that. We aren't comparing sources here we are having a reasonable discourse, so I see no need to untangle that thread further. all of which can be found in betas Please explain how this proves that poly mollifies hypergamy? depends how laws change but yes unless they update paternity laws So it would stand to reason t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 12:32 PM
1	The front in the marriage debate is poly Also yes it does mollify hypergamy Hypergamy is women being attracted to men they respect, admire, or are otherwise stationed above them. That is what hypergamy is. What we are talking about has nothing to do with hypergamy. betas get what betas want sex and relationships, women get what women want. a woman has not rationale reason to cuck a beta as the paternity would default to the alpha. Men are attracted to a woman's ability to offer him a genetic legacy. Seems the woman in your example is o…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 12:16 PM
1	The front in the marriage debate is poly First, when I talk about Alpha and Beta I'm not using them in a strictly RP sense. I am talking about them as traits a man can possess that often are incongruent with each other and that are selected for by the female population based upon individual propensities, stages in menstrual cycle and supply demand factors. Alpha traits are "Highly Masculanized Endocrine Markers" that suggest a high survival and replication value. These are the traits women display as caring about during one night stand…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 11:50 AM
2	The front in the marriage debate is poly How so?	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 10:59 AM
0	The front in the marriage debate is poly Hypergamy gets used in a strange way by TRP. It seems to be a catch-all term for any female mating behaviour, including dualistic mating strategy and branch swinging. For example, they would refer to a system in which women are entitled to a beta's money through a marriage contract with lax conditions for financial abuse whilst being allowed to actively court alphas for sex and maintain an ability to branch swing as soon as she feels a connection to another man a state of "open hypergamy". Becau…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 10:37 AM
2	Intelligent people more likely to be non-traditional, non-conservative; Intelligent men (not women) more likely to value monagamy So throughout human evolutionary history, men have mated with several women while women have mated with only one man. This completely ignores an overwhelming amount of information we have that suggests seminal competition is a very real and large component of human sexuality. It's crap work like this that earns evopsych it's shoddy rep when in reality it can be an enlightening lense through which to view human behaviour. More intelligent people are significantly more likely to exhibit social val…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 06:58 AM
2	"Don't Marry!" - Does this attitude bring success in the long term? This isn't true for some places. In Australia a partner is eligible for asset division and spousal support payments upon breaking up if they can show that they over a period of 2 years or more were reliant on their partner financially or otherwise (such as shelter, so cohabitation counts). In response, couples are getting binding financial agreements before cohabitating, but they offer barely a fraction of the flexibility in stipulations and clauses as a prenup. So for a man who enjoys LTR's in …	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 05:07 AM
3	Prove/disprove the gender pay gap? Despite what most TRPers think, women are not paid less because they don't work as hard. This was an excellent post and said pretty much everything that needs to be said, but I just wanted to highlight that in my experience there is no real general consensus surrounding the pay gap in RP circles other than that it doesn't exist in the "77 cents on the dollar" sense. So to claim this as a meme analogous with AWALT, AF/BB etc is a little misleading.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/15 04:37 AM
2	If the cock carousel is a part of most women's lives, then why is the average sexual partner number for Americans so low? I didn't make any assertions, the poster above me did, so the onus of proof is entirely upon you. I don't need to show his point to be true, you need to show his point to be false. You have questioned the assertion, but not debunked it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/07/15 11:06 PM
1	If the cock carousel is a part of most women's lives, then why is the average sexual partner number for Americans so low? Facts are not sexist, opinions and people are. By that definition if one is to form a politically incorrect or uncomfortable opinion based entirely on fact, one can still be sexist. Which reaffirms my point, that something is sexist does not make it "bad". Nature gonna nature, what is, is. Women have every right to have as much sex as they want with other consenting adults. And men have every right find women less attractive upon that basis. Sure, but there are plenty of men who have no problem …	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/07/15 10:58 PM