TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Corb_ Archive

View 0 posts and 158 comments by _Corb_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

He loves making stuff up. Like, for example, here, where he couldn't provide any evidence and the mods had to finally delete his comments due to personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:26 PM
3

I have a girlfriend, why would I care about having matches in a dating app?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 08:33 PM
3

Just have a verified account, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 08:29 PM
2

Holly molly the IA in this text wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 02:17 PM
3

Then why plenty of them have answered saying the amount of sex they have? Where do you find the 90% statistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 10:42 PM
3

That's odd, plenty of men who have sex and are in relationships have, in fact, answered.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 10:38 PM
2

Because red pillers, by and large, are unsuccessful. But most of the RPers answering this thread say that they actually believe that those women exist. Does this mean they are successful?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 03:44 PM
4

But the RP guys answering in this thread they mostly say that it is not hard to believe and those women exist. If they are as you say, wouldn't they be saying that it is hard to believe instead?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:55 PM
3

Aaaand he disappeared.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 07:33 AM
2

That’s very pedantic. No, it isn't. The implication is that men will say whatever she wants to hear whether they mean it or not. If his intentions are genuine and she welcomes the attention, then there’s nothing coercive about it, it’s simply a normal, flirtatious exchange.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:35 AM
–

But you can mean it. The question never says that "Telling her what she wants to hear" has to involve lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:25 AM
–

How is calling a girl pretty when you mean it and she wants to hear it a lie or coercion?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:21 AM
3

But if you don't, it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:15 AM
–

And if you don't lie to them it's not, that's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:11 AM
–

Apparently, you can't call her pretty, even if she wants to hear it, if you want to have sex with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:08 AM
–

It isn't if the part they want to hear is not a lie. How is telling a girl she's pretty, when you actually think she's pretty, and she wants to hear it, considered lying, deceit or manipulation?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:49 AM
–

Not necessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:41 AM
–

is lying coercive? Yes. But then the question should have been an unambiguous: "Lied to her by telling her whatever she wanted to hear." Because, like another one said, how is telling a girl she's pretty, when you actually think she's pretty, and she wants to hear it, considered lying or deceit?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:40 AM
–

Telling whatever she wants to hear is not necessarily lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:06 AM
–

According to the study, if you ever "Told her whatever she wanted to hear" and had sex with her, you're part of the 95%.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:03 AM
–

Sorry does your study include stuff like "my gf doesn't really feel like having sex rn, so I'll dress pretty and do stuff she likes in me so that she may get into the mood" ? It kind of does: "Told her whatever she wanted to hear". Apparently, if you manage to change her mood with words and you sleep with her, it means you coerced her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:01 AM
–

There must have been a misunderstanding, the paper says the exact opposite of what you're stating: Between 65 and 85 years, married men and women had a longer TLE and ALE than unmarried men and women. [...] Similarly, at 65 years, TLE for married women was 21.1 years, 1.5 years longer than unmarried women, and ALE for married women was 13.0 years, 2.0 years longer than unmarried women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 05:44 PM
1

Interesting. Do you know any study that suggests that women marrying men have shorter lifespans?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 07:12 AM
1

The video is 2 hours long. Where do they say that exactly? Which is the timestamp?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 05:00 AM
4

Don't have time to look at your links now, have to get off my plane. The first one literally contradicts her claim: Between 65 and 85 years, married men and women had a longer TLE and ALE than unmarried men and women. [...] Similarly, at 65 years, TLE for married women was 21.1 years, 1.5 years longer than unmarried women, and ALE for married women was 13.0 years, 2.0 years longer than unmarried women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:11 PM
3

Women who marry men have shorter life spans and the men who marry women live longer. Why is this? Can you specify where this statement appears in the paper you linked?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:48 AM
0

By 'successful,' do you mean being with someone? Because when asked here in a thread, many of them say they're with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 06:01 PM
2

From the link: Is the OP banned because this is fake? So it was some rational male reader who got divorced according to pasted tweet. Lol. Why would you use a link that contradicts your own claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 05:09 AM
2

And then they will put this guy and the Reacher actor in the same "The majority of men get relationships at some point of their lifes." category with a straight face.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:40 AM
–

It’s crazy if you think about it. Some people here have nothing better to do in their lives than crusade against rp even if that means literally denying people’s lived experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 08:04 AM
3

These threads are very fun to read. There are mostly two kind of comments: redpillers or rp-adjecent saying rp helped them in some degree and non or anti redpillers gaslighting the first group saying the rp didn't actually help them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 05:57 AM
–

An athletic, trained woman will be weaker than a sedentary man. Military Women VS Skinny Joes | WHO'S STRONGER?! Spoiler: the Skinny Joes (4 out of the 7 trials).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:18 AM
1

So you don't understand how math works and how to read a poll. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:21 AM
–

According to the poll results, this statement is completely true: "Women think they can beat a lion in higher % than men do." Women responded YES 8% of the times and men responded YES only 7% of the tomes. Since 8>7 we can state that there's no data manipulation. Additionally, women think they can beat a gorilla in 8% of the cases while men in 9% of the cases. If you state that "[men] is gender that thought they would win a fight with gorilla", we can confidently state that women are too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:14 AM
–

Saying that 8 is higher than 7 is data manipulation. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:37 AM
–

Welcome to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:34 AM
–

Women think they can beat a lion in higher % than men do...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:32 AM
1

You are unable to pinpoint the exact time where he says his wife had a kid before they married. It's as simply as that. You're just giving me more ammo to show the rest how big of a liar you are :)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 03:30 PM
1

It's not too late. Put here the exact time stamp where he admits he only has more than a biological daughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 03:21 PM
1

Which second in the video? Put the exact moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 03:17 PM
2

Of course and nowhere in the video is said she's not her biological child. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 03:14 PM
2

Yes, this is his biological daughter. I was asking for his supposedly single mom wife kid. Do you understand the difference? xD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 03:04 PM
2

How old was his wife supposed kid when they married? Is it a boy or a girl? Did he/she live with them? It will be super easy to answer for you, come on, we're waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 02:55 PM
2

A low quality jpg saying whatever is not an evidence he's married to a single mom. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 02:42 PM
2

Literally a low quality jpg that anybody could make in 30 seconds is not an evidence xD you need sources xD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 02:17 PM
2

Evdience that he married a single mom, as you said. Don't pretend you never stated it xD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 02:07 PM
1

So you still unable to find a single evidence of that months later xD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 02:02 PM
1

Is this supposed to be an evidence of that man marrying a single mom? xD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 01:58 PM
1

Never ask him why he doesn't bring anymore RT is married to a single mom: 1 and 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:33 AM
2

Edit2: it also has typos in the dataset, "kept touching and kissing her" has percentages that add up to higher than 100% Also 153 (12.9) and 347 (12.9) have the same %, for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 02:55 PM
3

"Most legal systems define rape" - then they are wrong. They aren't. The definition of rape is having sex without clear enthusiastic consent, those were rape. It isn't, not even in the dictionary. Did women wanted to have sex with those men? No, they didn't. That's why it was rape. It isn't since it doesn't follow in the definition of rape. And your comment is why men don't see anything bad about rape as long as it's not called rape and there are no legal consequences. You don't even know the de…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:40 PM
8

No. Most legal systems define rape as sex achieved through force, threat of force, or incapacity (e.g., being unconscious), not a lack of perfect emotional transparency. Those two instances are not rape by any means, otherwise I've been raped by women multiple times in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:21 PM
5

According to the study, if any of the men who responded to the poll either "told her whatever she wanted to hear" or "asked her repeatedly to have sex" and then had sex with a woman, that alone is enough to be included in the “rape” category. But no, those two things are not rape by any means. If they are, then I’ve been raped by women multiple times myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:14 PM
3

[Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:43 PM
26

it becomes oppression when men say "you don't deserve to want what you want. you should tolerate less" Randos on Reddit saying stuff I don't like = opression Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:53 AM
3

So she extrapolated her personal experience to an entire gender and created a thread based only on that? Imagine my shock. I still remember a thread here asking women if they wanted to be approached at the gym. One woman responded that women absolutely do not like being approached there, but another female user told her to speak for herself, because she personally loved it. Absolute cinema.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:12 PM
–

So no sources at all on your baseless opinion, alright, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:22 PM
–

I don't know, I don't spend my all my day on this subreddit and I don't think what is written here is a reflection or real life. Now, your turn, provide your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:21 PM
–

And zero evidence provided. Just a baseless personal opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:08 PM
0

I wish there was more statistics referred. Indeed, without them the thread is just a conjecture based on personal anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 12:41 PM
3

What happened?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 06:53 AM
5

the original Red Pill was club and bar strategies for tricking women into think you were cooler than you were (fuzzy hats, negging), This is PUA. OR RP was (or is) just understanding the intersexual dynamics, whatever you do with that information is out of scope.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 02:44 PM
1

So like she always does.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 01:11 PM
–

[Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 03:07 PM
3

Her claim is not even supported by the article.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:34 PM
3

She will provide a sourceless IA youtube video. Mark my words.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:35 PM
–

He likes to makes up stuff and failing to provide any evidence when asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 10:44 AM
1

He likes to makes up stuff and failing to provide any evidence when asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 10:27 AM
–

He also makes up stuff and fails to provide any evidence when is asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:36 PM
–

Where is the proof his wife was a single mother? Any link? Any source? Anything? You can't, you simply can't provide a single one. You know it, I know it, everybody knows it. You made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 04:47 PM
–

Of course I did. There are no credible sources anywhere to substantiate the claim that RT is married to a single mother. In your next comment, I am certain you will provide no evidence to the contrary, and that will be clear for everyone to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 04:42 PM
–

It took me like two seconds to debunk his lies too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 04:35 PM
0

That's not a proof, lmao, it's a sourceless low quality jpg. You have nothing to prove it. I bet anything that in your next message you won't bring anything else. PS: and as everyone can see, he has been unable to provide any single source.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:58 PM
1

A low quality jpg is not a source. Provide something reliable. Spoiler: he can't because it is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:54 PM
2

AND Let’s not forget the dude started popularizing the term TRP was already married to a single mom. [Citation needed]. Anyone can check this is false by simply and quickly asking your favourite AI the following question: "Did Rollo Tomassi (Rational Male) marry a single mother?" and check the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:49 PM
1

By promoting a grifter website with a PR pic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:43 PM
1

You promote a grifter, hence you are a grifter promoter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:38 PM
1

Sure, grifter promoter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:28 PM
1

No, grifter promoter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:23 PM
1

No they don't, grifter promoter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:16 PM
1

No. We're discussing your grifter promotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:06 PM
1

Absolutely nothing with the fact of you promoting grifters. At least you did't use a grifter PR pic to promote another grifter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:02 PM
1

Every body knows common and self-evident "water is wet" stuff. The same way every body knows promoting a grifter for free is lame.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:27 PM
1

Does "promoting a grifter for free while being an adult is a very sad thing to do" make more sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:24 PM
1

Of course, it's accurately a grifter PR. I have zero doubts about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:17 PM
1

A screenshot of a "water is wet" platitude with a link to a grifter book-seller site. Basically, a grifter PR. Yes, kids and teens take screenshots of platitudes and post them like if it's something deep like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:15 PM
1

So you go around taking screenshots of grifter PR pics and spam them left and right. And you do it for free. Amazing. How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:08 PM
1

Did you make the PowerPoint pic or did he send it to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:04 PM
1

I am not triggered. It just amazes me how a man (not sure if an adult since it looks like a 13 yr old Swifty behaviour) can promote and defend a grifter for free on the internet by spamming his PR pics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:00 PM
1

I don't care about the self-evident quote anybody with a little common sense knows. We are discussing your grifter promotion for free with your lame MS PowerPoint of a guy that sells books of "water is wet" phrases.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:55 PM
1

A grifter promotion is a grifter promotion, specially if they sell self-evident platitudes in books and rephrame them as something special the grifter discovered.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:51 PM
1

I admitted you promoted a grifter webpage in a lame PowerPoint for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:48 PM
1

You shared his webpage where he sells his books because that is a grifter PR pic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:42 PM
1

And since you didn't include any of that and just pasted a lame PowerPoint pic with a link to a grifters site what you did was simply promoting a grifter who says a commen sense self-evident platitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:38 PM
1

Of course, books and other publications don't use grifter PR pics when they quote other people. Mainly because promoter grifters is quite sad. And do it for free even more sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:31 PM
1

A PR pic and a quote are two different things. Otherwise you would have just written the quote but you wanted to promote the grifter instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:12 PM
1

The source would be just the name not a web page where a grifter is selling his stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 04:45 PM
1

Promoting a web page is not just a quote is promoting a web page of a book-seller grifter. Otherwise you would have just written the phrase and the name.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 04:41 PM
1

Why do not promote words, otherwise you would have posted the words, you are PRing a grifter web site.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 04:31 PM
1

The merits are as equal as saying water is wet. Why do you promote the web page of a book-seller grifter for free?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 04:24 PM
2

You don't need a PR pic with a web page of a book-seller grifter to post self-evident and common sense phrase. You would have simply written that in your own words but you wanted to promote a grifter for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 04:20 PM
2

So you're just PR him for free, lol. Did you make the pic yourself? I hope not.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 03:19 PM
1

Does he pay you or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 03:13 PM
2

I hope this grifter pays you at least for all the PR you do for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 02:33 PM
1

So just an excuse to avoid to provide anything. Totally expectable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 02:32 PM
2

So basically a personal description pushed into an IA. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:54 PM
2

So basically it is not a collection of hundreds thousands of men's pics downloaded, put it them in a database and asked an IA to draw the real average men based on all that data. It's just a picture from a description you wrote to an IA, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:51 PM
3

Send me the pics or it didn't happen. You just made up a description and told an IA to draw it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:41 PM
3

Just send me the link of the pics of the men that were leaked. It's not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:38 PM
3

Send a private message.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:32 PM
5

All the excuses of the world just to not do a simple thing: to prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:28 PM
4

Post the screenshot of the prompt and the blurred image you used to make that IA generated image. Otherwise you made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:24 PM
6

So you can't prove it. You made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:22 PM
5

Post the screenshot of the prompt and the blurred image you used to make that IA generated image. Otherwise you made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:18 PM
7

No it’s a composite of the type of men on these apps. Prove it or you made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:11 PM
13

So you made it up. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:05 PM
15

[Citation needed] PS: the redditor above confirmed the image was generated from a personal, arbitrary description, not based on any real men from the app.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:02 PM
3

[Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:31 PM
1

Yes, that would be a good start.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 09:47 AM
5

He explained that his comment was a direct response to the original poster's question, not a random judgment about a woman online. Your intensity about it, seemingly stemming from personal issues, feels odd.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 08:47 PM
1

Precisely because you take the time to write those text-walls with your issues and throw them to strangers on Reddit. Nobody does that unless it's a personal matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:55 PM
2

So you just simply got viscerally affected by the u/USPSHoudini opinion on OPs question and you made it personal. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:20 PM
4

Her reaction strongly suggests she's the type you mentioned earlier; it's otherwise difficult to explain such an intense response.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 06:44 PM
–

RP men do [Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 03:56 PM
4

So this is what your ex did.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 03:46 PM
5

He always does this. The moment you ask for a precise evidence he tries to avoid the question. u/RayAP19
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 05:54 PM
5

And... she's gone. Why does she do this all the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 03:14 PM
1

Can you be more specific?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 05:21 PM
3

[Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 05:05 PM
1

I asked sources first. You must provide them before I'll answer anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 10:05 PM
1

Why do you keep dodging providing sources?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 10:02 PM
1

Still zero sources to validate your claims. They must be very hard to find after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 10:01 PM
1

I am claiming that you need sources to validate your points.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 09:58 PM
1

I am claiming that you need sources to validate your points.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 09:55 PM
–

I am claiming that you need to put some sources to validate your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 09:52 PM
–

[Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 09:50 PM
3

The one I'm quoting. Why is it always the people who are chronically online the ones who tell the others to 'touch the grass' stuff? It's so funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 10:22 AM
-1

Our guess is that you don't, judging by your chronic case of being terminally online.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 09:39 AM
1

"I have gaps, bro, I promise, bro, you can perfectly tell when it's weekends and I go to clubs. I can quit whenever I want." xD
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 03:30 PM
–

Be chronically online, writing 37 messages per day non-stop without sleeping Know what's going on in bars and clubs Pick one xD
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:59 PM
–

You're a true redpill, fitting the description perfectly: the only thing the RedPill was able to do was to get perpetually online dudes to spend all their time talking about the RP. Online You're the ultimate redpill master, the quintessential chronically online guy who never stops talking about the redpill. Your dedication is impressive—it's like you've sacrificed your entire offline life to focus solely on being in this sub and talking about the red pill. 37 messages every single day, 1.5 mess…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:11 PM
–

Nobody can refute it, it is a flawless self-description. the only thing the RedPill was able to do was to get perpetually online dudes to spend all their time talking about the RP. Online You’re doing this nonstop, every single day, every hour—you’re the embodiment of it. Maybe you’ve taken are redpill but are too scared to admit it, which would explain your constant obsession.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 12:47 PM
–

to get perpetually online dudes to spend all their time talking about the RP. Says the chronically online guy spending all day posting in this only sub in a rate of 37 messages a day non-stop every single day.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 11:54 AM
9

Not being chronically online would help.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 04:43 PM
1

Attraction can’t be negotiated. This is what a RPer would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 03:37 PM
–

A man successful with women would spin plates unknowingly that it is called spin plates. RP is not creating the thing, just naming it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:57 PM
2

I have a gf and I am in a healthy relationship. It is working fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:56 PM
3

They're bitter because their potential wives spent their 20's having casual sex, whilst they themselves were trying and failing. Which has nothing to do about what spinning plates means or what it is for. Could have been avoided by having more realistic expectations and lookong for a long term partner when they turned 20. The assumption here is that men unable to have a healthy relationship is due to having unrealistic expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 10:45 AM
-3

They are bitter because they are unable to get any woman in the first place, which is the basic requirement to have a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 10:18 AM
-5

Baseless assumptions. A man can or cannot spin plates, be handy with women and, eventually, have a healthy relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 10:00 AM
-9

TRP also tells men to spin plates rather than have relationships Inaccurate. RP suggests sinning plates as a method to gain confidence with women. It is not mandatory to do it if you are already good with women and you want, or already have, a healthy relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 09:53 AM
–

Here’s an interesting article that also says women are starting to take bootcamps to learn how to pick up men. Not all men but only the hot ones. Those who are giving up dating are not the ones who these women are looking for: Page has subtly nodded towards a tall man with his back to us who is talking to his friend. “OK, that’s the target,”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:17 AM
6

1) If women were no attracted to them in the first place, assholes wouldn't be able to have women to stay with them. 2) Both. Being an asshole and keep getting women is a status symbol. It gives the message that women will rather prefer to be with you being an asshole with them than being with other men that would treat them better. 3) She can be nice with other people and still like the man. "I can change him" meme, basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:32 PM
7

1) Assholes are those men that can do whatever they want and keep getting girls. 2) It is not all what it takes. Women need to be attracted to you in the first place. 3) She can be the the most nice girl in the world and still be in love (or be attracted) by an asshole. It's not incompatible at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:20 PM
6

It's you who labeled them as assholes in your initial message of the thread, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:00 PM
32

an asshole in a relationship with a girl with a lot of severe mental problems? The false assumption here is that only girls with mental problems are having relationships with assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:31 PM
4

Aand... he's gone. He always does the same when evidence is presented.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:23 PM
8

You forgot the 'per capita'. Whites commit 70% of crimes being the 70% of population in the US, while blacks commit 26% of the crimes being the 14% of the population. Hence, blacks commit 1.86 times more crimes 'per capita' than white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter