TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_DonRa_ Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by _DonRa_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You can be a feminist in the real spirit of what the word feminist was supposed to mean, instead of this propagandized misogynist self serving mass that modern feminist groups in the West have become.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 10:26 AM
–

Itakes two people to make a child and pass on their genes, and the flip side also generally applies to women somewhat (maybe less than men), but short women are definitely not disadvantaged - they are somewhat more advantaged when it comes to attracting partners. So they will pass down their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:59 PM
2

Isn't it the same plot where criticizing a particular nation is called antiseptic or whatever
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 02:42 PM
1

False rape accusations, at least as defined legally are relatively rare. Several studies by groups, universities and police precincts estimate false rape accusations between 2.5% to 10%. However one thing all these propaganda spreaders conveniently drop is that the remaining 90% to 97.5% are not legally proven rape accusations either. False rape accusations in all these studies are categorised as such after being conclusively proven as false. While proven rape accusations are generally estimated…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 05:02 AM
38

Well at least the facts are there. The authors disappoint me tho It’s important to note that these figures do not take into account the frequency, context or impact of incidents. So, while it may be that teenage boys are more likely to report experiencing some forms of relationship abuse, girls may experience more severe impacts. It’s also possible that boys and girls have different thresholds for what they consider violence or abusive behaviour, leading boys to be more likely to report that the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 04:32 PM
18

Sources please. Sources are what you can use to rebuke claims made by extremists on other forums.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 03:27 PM
–

What are you on about
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:38 PM
–

Change what they want to do? Engineer social change and attitudes/perceptions towards it? Plenty of things have changed similarly; blockbuster, lobster, anime
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:33 PM
–

Okay and? The whole point is that op wants to promote people not parting with their money...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:30 PM
24

Pretty sure all my single friends would immediately download. Matches > no matches
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 04:02 PM
–

Likely to date != want to date Or is it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 05:54 AM
2

Aren't y'all saying the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:56 AM
2

It was a comparison to show hypocrisy. I do apologize I should've clarified
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 07:48 AM
1

I mean it's not even the generalized statements about women that I have a big issue with, but the idea that anyone questioning the justification for that is bad/misandrist/deserving hate. And also the false claim about stats to make that generalized claim (if the actual stats suggest that a man would be statistically very unlikely to face a false rape accusation) but they nevertheless claim it does without any actual statistical derivation (like the previous commenter does). This actually promot…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:05 PM
6

If a woman decides not to go to bars that's not unacceptable at all, it's her decision. If a man had a history of being attacked by women, it's acceptable for him to be wary of women. What I don't find acceptable is is when you take personal caution and possibly circumstance and turn it into a general sexist claim, in this case when fear of men is framed as broadly justified because men, as a class, are statistically dangerous, and when questioning that justification, especially on a valid stati…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:32 PM
–

What's a high enough probability? 1%? 5%? I'm done replying to you, every reply you make is in bad faith and utterly lacking any statistical derivations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:49 PM
–

I've explained how that is a strawman and the statistics behind it and the distinction of the two situations. You're the only one with a lack of understanding of statistics or logic. Again you're openly being misandrist - your take is no better than a misogynist proclaiming that all women are likely to falsely accuse you of rape since the overwhelming majority of people who falsely accuse people of rape are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:48 PM
–

This is in part irrelevant and in part again factually wrong. Irrelevant in the sense that my comparison to sentiments about black people was to expose hypocrisy on the part of the earlier commenter - I actually agree with everything you say about the dangers, in fact my take was based on the idea that if anything there is much more evidence of "hood bad" than "men bad" in the two contexts to state it in an oversimplified manner. Factually wrong, because neither statistics nor even your own anec…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:33 PM
–

That does nothing to support the conclusion that a man is likely to commit SA. The only conclusion that statistic supports is about the likelihood of the assaulter being a man GIVEN an SA happening. Also not only are your conclusions lacking statistical support, you're also a hypocrite if you accept that a reasonable person wouldn't use the same logic to justify being prejudiced against black people. The overwhelming majority of men don't commit SA, the chance of a randomly sampled man committin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:19 PM
–

The overwhelming majority of bears don't interact people, you're making a strawman. The overwhelming majority of men have large numbers of interactions with many women and have not committed SA. There is no statistical evidence whatsoever to support the conclusion that a randomly sampled man is likely to do SA. Again yours is nothing but a take driven by misandrist propaganda with no factual backing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:10 PM
–

Lived experience and statistics are nowhere near your side, just misandrist propaganda. The overwhelming majority of men do not commit SA. If anything, statistics support being prejudiced against black people, and even with statistics a reasonable person wouldn't think that is okay. Without even statistics to back you up you're just being blatantly misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:49 PM
–

So you are a hypocrite. It is not in fact rational since the overwhelming majority of men don't do SA. It is paranoia as far as it goes since it's not backed by facts or probability. The overwhelming majority of people in your echo chamber of misandry do. "The danger of men is real and not unreasonable" is as open a misandrist statement as you can find anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:47 PM
–

Are you also wary of black people or are you a hypocrite? The paranoia isn't justified nor rational, it is in fact called paranoia for a reason. Feel what you will and keep it within yourself, but don't expect to be justified when you want to proclaim it to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:15 PM
0

Well actually there is zero evidence to support the claim that most men are friends with a rapist, unless friend somehow means mutually knowing names and having talked at some point. Most of these bullshit claims come from propaganda driven interpretations of stats, for example x% of women were raped, each man has y friends hence most men are friends with rapists. Childish rhetoric at it's best.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:49 AM
1

Cool story bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 05:22 AM
1

Ah yes all men are guilty forgot that my bad crazy shit bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 05:04 AM
0

Can you with your great intelligence explain how a low conviction rate makes everyone who is not convicted automatically guilty?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 10:39 AM
1

Where did you pull this 92% stat from
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 09:31 AM
3

You know what you're right I'm sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 04:22 AM
6

They are not. Their wording is gender specific, as I stated with the examples I highlighted
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 06:52 PM
–

They are on the post. Kindly stop arguing in bad faith
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:07 PM
7

Almost all the replies here to op are ignoring the main point to talk about some minor detail (paper abortion?) Or specifically ignoring ops listed out evidence. Or trying to equate gender neutral laws to gender specific laws. So much bad faith replies
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:05 PM
1

Almost all the replies here to op are ignoring the main point to talk about some minor detail (paper abortion?) Or specifically ignoring ops listed out evidence. Or trying to equate gender neutral laws to gender specific laws. So much bad faith replies
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:04 PM
5

Except for the banned hijabs, none of these laws/policies are exclusively directed towards women, rather their application in practice is commonly affecting more women than men. I do believe the op specifically is talking about laws which in themselves affect men and women differently (eg: explicit different retirement age based on gender) as opposed to difference in outcomes (your eg: domestic workers, stalking laws etc which legally apply equally to both genders)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:00 PM
–

He does, and examples to back it up. You've just cobbled up some big words without addressing either his points or examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 04:54 PM
2

Don't hurt me no more
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 06:32 PM
1

Hey I was just doing some reading do you have any articles/links on the two different frameworks and the groups that supported/fought those
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 07:19 AM
1

Not really porn ig, I don't think most normal people post revenge porn. I expect just general bad mouthing, lies, omissions, smear campaigns. It's not anything new, its pretty common to see in many places, and not limited to women either, many sorts of people do this sort of thing within their circles/social media groups, except this just gives a common/public platform for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:10 AM
1

The reality is that not everything is black and white, and people often have problems where neither is in the "right". Breaking up/divorcing in an amicable manner is not overwhelmingly the norm. Plenty of people will bad mouth those they have problems with, and not only in failed relationships but in society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:01 AM
2

So jaded exes don't exist in the part of the world where it's popular?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 09:48 AM
2

Are you really claiming that only women who want to share stories of SA or whatever will get on board what is essentially a gossip app
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:48 PM
2

Did you date my ex?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 01:09 AM
1

There's nothing new here because you've completely ignored the points all along. Nowhere have you addressed my argument, even when I showed how your own logic concedes to it. But of course, do run along since you anyway can't defend your position without dismissing valid logic as opinions and ignoring context and the nuance of arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 04:19 AM
-4

Bruh you're doing it again, any logic you don't like is merely an opinion. You dismiss context whenever you don't like it, and then argue in a vacuum without it. Also everything you said in your initial comment is also an opinion and completely irrelevant. You still haven't drawn a meaningful distinction between things like cheating and assault being also okay if it's in line with personal morals according to your same logic. "WHO ALSO WANT TO DATE THEM" doesn't change anything because the whole…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 05:31 PM
2

And I'm still waiting for you to grow a brain with more than one cell that can comprehend language 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:42 PM
2

Lol you mean your one brain cell can't keep up with the slightest language complexity 😂😂😂 no need to reiterate that you made that clear at the very beginning
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:40 PM
2

Lol bro you not cornering anyone with your small d 😂😂😂. Bros one brain cell real tired with compensating for the small d, you really think you did something there didn't you 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:30 PM
2

I see you're still living in your pussyland fantasy, must be a welcome break from your small d reality. You must be real hurt to try to keep talking about demisexuality. It's okay you enjoy your fantasy bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:18 PM
2

When bro wants to feel like he's not alone with his small d energy in pussy dessert - "Lemme quickly go on Reddit and claim a bunch of people get no pussy" 😂😂😂 Aww little bro trying to cope by strawmanning about demisexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:55 PM
2

Aww, you think your small d nonsense upsets me? Your small d energy is quite strong there 😂😂😂. It's okay you go thinking that, you need a win to make up for your small d in pussy dessert.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:50 PM
2

Sure thing bro. Bro thinks going around the internet claiming random people get no pussy makes his dick grow bigger. 😂😂😂 Anyone can see that the guy throwing "no pussy" around like an insult is the only one obsessed with getting pussy. You sad your small d isn't working out for you? 🥺🥺🥺 There there
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:45 PM
2

Yes yes you're right no one except your small d gets pussy. You the man bro
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:38 PM
2

Say whatever makes you feel better about your small d bro 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:23 PM
3

No time wasted since I don't have to come up with anything logical to address your nonsense. You're the one who can't define any of the words demisexuality, behaviour and displaying. Anyone checking my profile can see this is literally the first purple pill post I've commented on. You're the only one letting people know about your small d. Bro really thinking he accomplished something with "you get no pussy", that's just third grade "your mama" lines for overgrown kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:19 PM
4

Pot meets kettle? You think I'd waste my time on you after you ignored multiple good faith attempts to argue? And yes you're fibbing because this is literally the first post I've commented on. Your comment history on the other hand... full of small d energy. Do you think someone's gonna come by and stroke you for throwing around you no get pussy if you criticise a woman comments on Reddit? 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:41 PM
6

Cool story bro. Also I barely have any post history since I started using Reddit recently so stop fibbing. Good luck with your ad hominems and strawmans with your two bit brain incapable of basic language comprehension. Only thing that doesn't exist here is a functioning brain in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:21 PM
1

Have you ever understood the words "premise of an argument"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:04 PM
1

This is a nonsensical manipulation of stats. The only paradigm this makes sense in is if women are born and die after getting married in an year.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:02 PM
6

Lol you're completely ignoring my logic and the usage of the word demisexuality - that is the obtuseness. The only thing hilarious here is how you're pretending to have any logic. And the strawman was your tangent on "nobody owes you sex" which I never said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 12:48 PM
1

It doesn't. And it doesn't need to apply to me to talk about the premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 12:44 PM
7

Wow bro out here bringing peak logical retorts "you can't get pussy" and I'm somehow the immature one. It's clear your two bit mind can't grasp any nuance, including a distinction between demisexual feelings and falsely exhibiting demisexual behavior even after I drew a simple parallel. Again nowhere have I said that anybody owes anyone sex, but it's pointless reiterating that since you can't grasp the slightest idea of logic, nuance or context or are intentionally being obtuse to all of it. Cle…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 12:35 PM
–

Cool story, everything that doesn't fit your narrative is fantasy. Still doesn't change that you're arguing in bad faith and that all your comments are pointless if you change goalposts midway and claim the premise of the discussion isn't real. And yes go ahead fallback to calling everyone who says something you don't like an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:38 AM
–

If you're now going to just say the entire premise of the post and argument does not happen at all, why even bother making your first comment. It's pointless to come here and discuss something if you're just going to change the premise on which it was made. If you're not going to argue in good faith don't bother replying anymore. Sneaking in ad hominem attacks doesn't make you look any better either.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:23 AM
–

That is neither here nor there since we are explicitly talking about a situation where history is known.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:07 AM
5

I know exactly what demisexual means, you're the one who doesn't have a proper reading comprehension. I specifically said demisexual behaviors, not being a demisexual (parallel: an adult can display child like behaviors without in fact, being a child). Also, I'm not sure if it's your child like reading comprehension skills or if you're being intentionally obtuse, but you're very conveniently completely ignoring the context on which the whole post was based. A woman not being attracted to you but…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:04 AM
–

You missed the most important part of the context, but yes. More specifically, if said woman has always wanted to get to know people before sex, then that is indicative of her attraction comfort with familiarity for sex, and it shouldn't be a problem if she wants to get to know him well. However, if said woman has never needed that with anyone before, that too is indicative of her comfort with familiarity for sex and attraction, or in this case lack thereof - this she does because there is a lac…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 10:55 AM
1

No his claim is not that he's entitled to anonymous sex, but rather that sex is a manifestation of attraction, and that how it manifests depends on the individual BUT doesn't randomly get overhauled, and that he is entitled to an honest representation of the attraction present - i.e. if the women are feeling just so so about him then they should tell him so and let him end the relationship and look for someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:23 AM
2

Women are not obliged to have sex at any point, but they are obligated to represent themselves honestly to any person they are dating, especially in terms of something as important to a relationship as attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:13 AM
4

Lol according to you any logic or basis that you don't like is just an opinion to be discarded. Also according to your logic people get to decide if cheating or rape is also okay according to their personal morals and nobody else gets a say in it. And finally for all your dismissal and twisting around the point, you haven't addressed his main point: you argue that there's nothing wrong with women wanting to date people that they're not attracted to, but his main problem was that it's wrong for w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:10 AM
12

Isn't that his whole point - he's saying that she should say she doesn't like him directly instead of lying to him and leading him on by engaging in demisexual behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter