TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_EX Archive

View 1 post and 107 comments by _EX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

General_EX/r/MensRights21/09/24 06:03 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's probably true that apps are not for you and you should focus elsewhere, but no one is giving you any advice on what you should be doing instead. Apps environments are like picking up girls from night clubs. Not all women go to clubs and not every guy is suited to club environment, so a different environment is your best bet. Im assuming that there's not many opportunities to meet women at work or in your existing friend groups so I recommend joining activity clubs like your life depends on …
/r/MensRights08/06/25 05:50 AM
1

Haha. Charming. "Life is a scam for men" is a true statement if only it's talking about you and OP. But it's not a true statement for men like me who have a great life and fulfilling relationships with women. For men like us, life is great. I can see why you are stuck in the "scam" camp, but I have to say that the "fulfilling life" camp is much better. I genuinely hope one day you can have a fulfilling relationship with a women and enjoy your life.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 03:15 AM
-1

Or in my life. I have a fulfilling life with my wife.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 10:16 PM
0

Ok fair enough. If living as though you're being scammed is good for you, then more power to you. I don't feel my life is a scam and I'm glad I didn't have that attitude when I was younger. I'm an average man and I was able to create an amazing life with my wife.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 10:14 PM
-9

I don't feel scammed. We all have problems and some are worse than others but we can only do our best. Inside of that, there's a lot of amazing relationships and fulfillment that you can get if you keep postive.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 10:31 AM
0

What are the other kinds of relationships that he's talking about. Romantic, friendship and ...??? Professionally? Chemically? Is he posting on mensright that he's upset that he's chemically disposable?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:10 AM
1

Ok.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:07 AM
2

Do you think there are no men in the world who are cared for or who are not treated as disposable?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:54 AM
0

No it doesn't. "You're assuming this is only about romance, straight romance too." Except I didn't assume it was only about romance. You're wrong.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:52 AM
0

No. I said both relationship and friendships.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:42 AM
-3

None taken. My point is that when you say things like "we are disposable" and "No one cares about us", you are objectively wrong. There are others who lead amazing lives with women and are not treated as disposable. The cause for your situation isn't your gender it's something else. Not that you will take this optimistiy, but knowing that others can "make it" should be a cause for motivation.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:41 AM
-7

Yeah I'm glad too. I'll never understand how some people can be so hopelessly pessimistic when there's so much proof to the opposite. Knowing that there are other men who have had successful relationships with female partners and friends, doesn't it make you want to get that for yourself? You know it's possible.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:36 AM
-7

As a man who is cared for by many wonder women in my life, you are wrong.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 01:35 AM
2

Out of curiosity, what is my defense of them? What did I say to defend their actions?
/r/MensRights07/10/24 02:54 AM
1

I'm not defending them. Throw them into the sun. I'm saying that a shitty post of "girls do bad thing" on a men's rights sub is bad for the cause. Talk about unfair prosecution or talk about gender disparity in sentencing. But this is just team sports. The post you made is a really good point, but it's not located in the OP Even after pushing OP, he said that his point was that rape of men it's widespread, so you're points don't align. That's my point. Unless you already have your own opinions f…
/r/MensRights06/10/24 11:02 PM
3

1) I'm sorry you cant make a point 2) ... Except for the case you pointed to was an example where they were brought to justice? "Women never get brought to justice for crimes against men" Only links one 10 year old case which shows the opposite of your point 3) I guess I'm not on your side if your side is to just point out crimes women have committed. Not every crime a woman commits is a men's rights issue, just like men's crimes aren't a women's rights issue.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:55 AM
-15

1) it literally isn't obvious because I can't tell whether you think this is a good application of men's rights or a bad application of men's rights. The women were charged with the crime. It sounds like the men's rights were applied sufficiently. Unless you're implying that an example of a female harming a man is relevant to men's rights alone. 2) so you think men do not have legal protections, despite the perpetrators being charged with the crime? 3) and you think posting a vague, 10 year old …
/r/MensRights06/10/24 04:14 AM
-22

1) does your post even mention this commentary on rights? 2) even if this existed, are you suggesting that this is a right that men do not have? 3) the women were charged with the crime, so it seems like the the system worked. What's your rights based complaint? Or are for celebrating how the judicial system provided justice to crimes of women?
/r/MensRights06/10/24 03:51 AM
-29

Also it's not about men's rights. It's just a story where women are bad.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 01:20 AM
7

99% of the posts are negative so I think it's demoralizing
/r/MensRights29/09/24 11:35 PM
1

That's why I said need is a weird word to use in the OP. We need others to survive, but obsessing over a need(women) is something different. If you ignore the biological things, it's possible to have a perfectly fulfilling life without women. You can get community from friends and have a pseudo family in that way. I wouldn't recommend that, but I thinking you "absolutely must have women" can lead to an unhealthy relationship with women. Fixing the misconception can help you have a healthy relati…
/r/MensRights28/09/24 02:34 AM
12

"Need" is a weird word for it, but I think most people with healthy relationships with the opposite gender understand that you don't need the other. Of course you need them to have kids, or to build a family. But you don't need them to live a happy life. Like you said, validation seeking or other pathologies can be a the reason that people feel like they need women or they can't survive. Maybe you should treat it like an unhealthy addiction so you can get it out of your mind.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 08:26 AM
3

YouTube commentsarent relevant to anything No one who posts on YouTube comments has their life in the right place.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:47 AM
1

Wait. What do you think you're answering? 1) "Out of curiosity, what is the purpose in the subreddit posts about individual crimes of females on men?" Is your assault the answer to why he posted an individual crimes of a women? Did OP know you and your history? 2) "Does this have something to do with men's rights?" Your assualt is the answer to how a mother drowning her son is related to men's rights?? I don't know how your experience is even connected to this murder. I'm sure you have a reason …
/r/MensRights24/09/24 11:50 PM
1

Yeah. Both sides need to have advocates for their side.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 11:45 PM
1

If gynocentric means protecting women, Then I think it could be a gynocentric patriarchy. Is that possible? It is the men who lead but they choose to protect women in unique ways. Like a father being overly protective of his daughter and less protective of his son.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:25 AM
1

I've never heard of plutocracy before. I'll look it up.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:23 AM
1

It's not about in-group bias or out-group bias. It's not about creating a system that is bias towards the in group. It's about creating a system in the best way you can, but you are a human with experiences in some areas and Blindspots in others. A mother making a genuine attempt to understand and make decisions about how to handle her son's sexual hormones or violent outbursts will not come as close as a father. Any decisions she makes will be based on her experiences, which is limited. She mig…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 10:58 AM
0

I never said it's dominated with overtly male interests or interested that benefit males specifically. Like a father leading the household, there will be decisions made that are bias in the mindset of the father. Decisions made will have a tendency to male orientated as he will have a Blindspot to the way that a female matriarch would solve issues. Unless you think there is no difference between the leadership that a patriarch provides vs what a matriarch provides, you must understand that a mal…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:23 AM
2

Haha downvotes are almost guaranteed in this subreddit. It is what it is. I dont know what the goal is of posting the crimes of women. If it is just to show stories where the other gender is the villain, then men will lose that battle every single time. There was a thread last week asking why people dismiss MRAs, and this kind of attitude is the reason why. "MRA" just sounds like 'anti-women' to most people now.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:32 PM
2

what would you call that society then? It seems that Norway and Sweden and Israel do this. Are they patriarchies?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:23 PM
1

Ok but thats not what Im talking about. I was asked to give my definition and we can talk about that, or you can give your definition and we can talk about that. Im not a feminist so im not going to justify what they think. I disagree with them.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:18 PM
1

Thats a really good point too. And, given that step parents are more likely to hurt the child, I would assume that the number of men who kill children is extra high because there are more step fathers than step mothers.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:15 PM
1

Ok fair enough. That has never been my opinion of women so it just looked like team sports. I dont think anyone on the mensrights subreddit thinks that women are innocent angels but sure.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:12 PM
1

I dont know what you're talking about. The post is about cases where women are incarcerated instead of their male partners. You said that you think its suspect because there are more men in prison. But thats not relevant to this top post. There can easily be many more men in prison and the OP can still be true. I even gave reasons why it would make sense that men would be overly represented. Or, do you think that 'more men in prison' == 'women dont get wrongfully convicted'?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:09 PM
2

Yeah you're absolutely correct. It will be nebulous but its still a word with usage so I was curious what people think about it and how its used.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:05 PM
0

I think I explained this in a different comment thread. Even if you have the best of intentions, any human has blindspots. If the father is the leader of a house hold and gets the final say in all major choices, then it will tend to be male focused. He will understand the son's experience/troubles more than his daughters and so decisions made based on that experience might be more male oriented.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:03 PM
-2

I think that what you said is true but I don't think that's what patriarchy means. I don't think it means a system that is designed for the purpose of benefiting men.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:16 AM
-2

I am aware of the dress code but this is influenced by a patriarchal dictator government. I'm sure you hate feminist saying it but patriarchy can also harm men in cases too. We can all understand that men throughout history have protected women and children, and sometimes that puts men to their death in war. It's a negative effect of a male orientated view. Men also not having a say or suffering from some rules too doesn't mean the system is controlled by men with male interest at the core in my…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:12 AM
1

I put my definition in the comment from the Mod That's interesting. So, if we were to define patriarchy as "a society where men dominate women", it seems that you would say that we currently have a patriarchy and have always had a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 10:13 AM
-1

I think you're asking about examples of how a leader can prioritize male interest vs female interest. For the male side, there are a lot of extreme patriarchy examples you can think of that might not be ubiquitous but here are some ones that I think are common: -The Father understands how young men might try to take advantage of his younger daughter so he is overly strict with how she can interact with men. I.e No revealing clothes, no dates where she is in the car with a boy, the father must me…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 10:09 AM
1

Yes, that is very true. Direct video evidence of the incident taken by the defendant is always thrown out of court. All lawyers know that male defendants cannot provide any evidence that will aid in their defense. My bad. Sorry OP. You're a gonner.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 08:56 AM
0

Yeah there will always be nuance in this kind of judgement about a whole system Assuming we agree that 1940-50s USA was a patriarchy , one could still point to situations where women had the upper hand, like not being conscripted. It would have to be an overall look at the rights, access and opportunity of both genders in society. That's one of the reasons why I'm curious what people think on this subreddit. I was guess that everyone here knows that it was patriarchy basically everywhere 200 yea…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 08:12 AM
-11

Sorry to hear that. Not quite sure what an individual case of a mother drowning her son has to do with that though.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 07:54 AM
2

It would depend on the situation. I've been in a situation where my ex gf tried to do something like DV and there was the understanding that she could hurt herself and I would be to blame. My recommendation is to record whatever you can with your phone, so you can show it was not mutual and then leave. If you are unable to leave, keep recording everything and just defend yourself to the legal degree that you're able to.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 07:26 AM
2

Yeah that's a good point. I guess I was referring to what other use it as in this subreddit, but its not often defined. My definition would be something like "a society where the males are generally treated with higher value within the society (opportunity, rights, access) and where the societal structure is generally lead or "controlled" by men and by male interest" An example I have would be a country like Saudi Arabia, where women have less rights, opportunity , and access. The rules and laws…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 07:04 AM
3

I did some rough research and it seems to be somewhat balanced (which is horrible nonetheless). A review analysis I found suggests that women are more likely to kill the child in the first few weeks, but then the males are overrepresented in the later time of the child's life. "While mothers are overrepresented in cases of infanticide,24 filicides that occur after the first week of life are often committed by the father or stepfather, with fathers being the most frequent perpetrators of filicide…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 06:56 AM
1

Wouldn't it make sense that more men are in prison than women. Maybe it gets more questionable when looking in particular crimes, but a lot of crimes are obviously more commonly associated with men than women. I can see some kinds of theft or drugs related crimes being balanced out, but it would make sense that crimes that involve murder, rape or even white collar business crimes are more likely to connect to males. It makes sense that more men are in prison for murder than women.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 06:34 AM
1

I understand that India has some terribly bias laws. Those should be abolished. I looked into India a little bit just now and it looks like India has pretty horrible conditions for women too, so It looks like both sides need some bolstering if we want a fair society
/r/MensRights21/09/24 06:24 AM
-12

So the post is about shorter sentences for mothers who kill their own children vs men who kill their children?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 06:05 AM
-16

Out of curiosity, what is the purpose in the subreddit posts about individual crimes of females on men? Does this have something to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 05:59 AM
2

How dare you ask questions. Haha You expect people who have a entrenched position against something to be able to explain the easiest answer about who they actually think they are fighting?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 08:19 AM
1

Yeah I have seen a lot of garbage takes, even on regular subs. Of course the feminist ones are bad about it but I was surprised when I saw it on the normie ones too.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 07:19 AM
0

I know you're being somewhat sarcastic so maybe this comment doesn't apply to you specifically, but I think that this kind of reflex is one of the reasons why things are not getting better and why the opinion of MRAs is negative. I understand that the natural reaction to unreasonable comments like "generalizations are fine" is to do the same in the same direction and show them the flaw. But reflecting radicalism with radicalism makes things worse and solutions harder to come by. I'm sure people …
/r/MensRights20/09/24 06:47 AM
0

That is true. I think this idea of men has basis in fact, but the generalisation hurts men who aren't a part of that aggressive or resilient group, like most generalizations.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 06:34 AM
-1

What do you mean. Incels can talk as publicly as anyone else.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 06:32 AM
10

This is a good point. The idea that making laws to reduce your freedom to leave a marriage is good for men is not correct. Everyone should have the right to leave a relationship if it is toxic or destructive. Being legally trapped in a bad relationship is not something we should want for men.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 06:31 AM
-7

I have an answer that you will not like, so I expect downvotes. As someone who is active on both sides of the discourse, I think I have a good understanding Obligatory concessions before I begin "Mens rights has a necessary purpose" "Certain rights of men have been infringed upon " "Men have it worse than women in some real and unfortunate situations " The answer I have is that, unless you are deep in the trenches of MRA content, the "battlefield" looks very very different. To others who are not…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:27 AM
0

Everything is a zero sum game in this subreddit. If women are doing well, it means men are losing and they are bad. If men are doing well, it means women are losing because men are actually better.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 09:30 PM
1

The response of men or women about the male victims has nothing to do with the morality of the crime that was committed. One man being assaulted is not less serious because another man belittled him for it. If you're in an argument, bring it back to whether or not the victim was wronged. The response to it is secondary and a deflection
/r/MensRights14/09/24 10:43 PM
1

Yeah i get that. I'm not saying you're crazy. You have your interview experience and I have mine. I'm always applying for jobs so I do interviews every few months for new positions. 90% are guys but the females I've had before haven't been bad. The market might be different in our industries so it's not a 1-1 comparison though
/r/MensRights13/09/24 06:56 AM
1

The last 3/4 jobs I had were female hiring managers. I never had an issue, but I can absolutely see that there will be a difference in interview atmosphere. I suspect that some guys perform better with female interviewers, and some guys perform better with male interviewers.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:37 AM
-1

Fair enough. In my experience it was just to describe guys to don't want to try and get girls. If that's negative, then that's negative. But it seems pretty accurate when I was younger and hearing it
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:39 PM
-22

Why would you assume it's shameful. They have words for herbivore and carnivore and it is a reasonable description for what it is. Herbivores aren't known for hunting prey, which is the point. I haven't heard of it being used as an insult.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:33 PM
2

I'm not saying I can tell, but I'm saying the guys who got burned are definitely not the ones who can tell. Ive had amazing experiences with women in my life. If every woman around you secretly (or openly in a court of law) hates you, I think that says more about you. The fact that I haven't had a poisonous relationship is not evidence that I don't know what I'm talking about haha. That's insane. I wouldn't trust the advice of the guy who has 0 positive relationships with women.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 09:15 AM
2

I'm not white knighting. Some women are good; some women are bad. Fuck the bad ones for sure. But you choosing bad women and now being blind to the good ones means nothing. Yeah I've never experienced family court. I have good taste in women. My father never experienced family court because he had good taste in women, my mother. My grandparents never experienced family court because they had good taste too. I think they problem might be you bro. If I reverse the genders, I'll say the same thing.…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 07:07 AM
-2

As long as you are allowed to wear make up and women aren't allowed to wear hats, you have no right to fight for. It's not a sexism based right. Both have the same access. You're just bitter than your right for makeup won't cover your balding. But we don't design rights like that. Others in the thread have said that women are allowed to wear singlets but men aren't. That's something that's worth fussing over.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 04:14 AM
0

The funniest example is Brock Turners mother. He raped a girl, she helps him flee the country. Ruins her life to protect her scumbag son "Sure, they are out there". Ok so maybe you're just surrounded by bad ones. Your anecdote doesn't counter my anecdote of amazing supportive women, one who even saved me from having my life destroyed and had nothing to gain. I'm lucky to be surrounded by supportive women, I guess. But that means that it's more of an issue of the company you keep, rather than the…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:18 AM
-4

True Scotsman fallacy. Do you actually think that mothers don't actually support their sons? These are situations where the men do not provide for or protect their mothers and It's the perfect counter to your claim that women do not care for men. Or, when you say "women", are you only referring to "my ex gf". There's a lot of other kinds of women. Friends, mothers, sisters, teachers, soldiers etc. to say that not one of them actually care or support a single male is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:00 AM
2

Luckily I have met many women who care about men. Maybe you have had bad luck or a bad mother, but I hope you find some one day. Good luck brother
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:46 PM
7

Why do you think no one will care though? Theres 7 billion people. Heck, I'm not getting anything from you and I care about your well-being.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 12:31 PM
9

Do you honestly think that you have never and will never have anyone that cares about you?
/r/MensRights05/09/24 12:24 PM
1

So when you said "That is an assumption of good faith that you can not really make here.", you actually mean "you can assume good faith until OP shows that they are not responding in good faith"? ... So basically what I was suggesting from the start then. At least we agree
/r/MensRights04/09/24 06:29 PM
1

???? You're literally making the assumption that women who post are posting in bad faith. Isn't it bad faith to assume someone is bad faith before they even get a chance to say anything? Others are avoiding me? I don't know what you mean
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:16 PM
1

You're right. Let's assume bad faith when someone doesn't agree with the hive mind.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:05 PM
1

That's fair. But if they aren't bringing any substance with their posts, it should be easy to counter what they are saying.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 11:41 AM
7

If they say something wrong, you can correct them. If they say something irrelevant to the sub, you can report them. I think posts from all sides should be welcome.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 07:27 AM
3

I think it's thrown around way too much. It's basically calling someone a loser even if they are not actually incels. I think that's how most insults go though. 1) Start with an unbias label for descriptive purposes (incel, whore, retard) 2) then it gets expanded out to people who are not in that group but have some quality that's similar (ways of acting, ways of talking, ways of thinking or dressing) and used as an edgy insult. 3) then the word loses all meaning until we need to find another un…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:01 AM
-3

I get the feeling that these kinds of responses happen in interactions where the other person wasn't interested in you and they felt like they were superior to you. If you get in a situation where both sides are interested in each other, they tend to be more fair. They won't dismiss your preferences like that.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 09:09 AM
-3

There are some general men's rights stuff here, but most of what I see is tweets from celebrities complaining about men, or posts where men say "dating is impossible; women are too toxic", or "why do guys have to strong and women can just be lazy"
/r/MensRights03/05/24 08:03 AM
-7

This sub is just a mirror version of r/feminism. It stopped being a place for men's rights and more about "woman's wrongs" a long time ago.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:22 AM
1

Proud of you if you aren't interested in it, but it's a driving force for literally all living organisms. It's not a surprise that people enjoy it and focus on it
/r/MensRights24/04/24 05:14 AM
1

I've seen the exact same statement about women all over this subreddit. You should be happy that everyone is in agreement.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:19 AM
-12

All of those arguments I made are strawmen. Women do it. Men do it. I'm just explaining the shit I see on this thread. You're making my point. You can go down that chain as far as you want. Women lobbied those policies because of a felt imbalance in their current situation. Men could leave them deserted with a family and no way to support them. Men still do that to a lot of women who, even with the courts behind them, can't draw blood from a stone. Some women today are still left carrying the ba…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:13 AM
-12

I think it's about 50/50. Maybe 60/40 on the side of women if I'm being generous. But so many comments are like "women are the problem" ,"men should give up on modern women", "women are toxic". I'm a guy and I know the bad parts of male -female interactions. But the delusions of a lot men here are insane. We both play a part. M: "Women are trash" F: "Dad's are leaving families/ not teaching daughters" M:"That's because women push men out and have one sided judgement in society and courts." F: "M…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 05:18 AM
-18

Shhhh. You're not allowed to lay responsibility on men in any form in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 04:08 AM
2

There are both situations. Lazy gf and amazing bfs and amazing gf and lazy bfs. Of course a men's subreddit will notice the men's stuff, which is totally fair. But I think we should be aware that it's not reality. But I think this subreddit is mostly about fighting feminism with the exact same tactics
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:38 AM
-2

It's hard to evaluate the balance, especially with everyones individual relationship, but there's a lot of relationships where that's the case. The woman gives much more. Even on this subreddit, they complain about the amazing girl who's wasting her time with a deadbeat Chad who doesn't treat her right, and how she's so stupid to not choose them. So they are aware of women giving more when it's in that situation. But when it's about them, not about another guy, suddenly women are only takers.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:28 AM
-2

Yeah, we both do things for each other. If they are upset that they have to do things for their gf, imagine having a gf that does nothing for you. We both give and take.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:25 AM
-16

Genuinely asking, do you get along with many women?
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:21 AM
1

Happy cake day. Yeah I think he's the worst. But anyone who gets to that level is going to be hated by some group. All females included.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 02:29 AM
1

Yeah I think he is that too. Of you're a man, you shouldnt care.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:03 AM
-1

Ive only seen people destroy her, and rightly so. He was vindicated and she's famous for being a psychopath who shits on beds
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:02 AM
1

I agree most don't care about his personal life. OP is talking about how the world tears down men for the personal life, for those very actions. The fact that no one cares is my point
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:00 AM
2

If you show how liberal men are being pumped up to be powerful, wouldn't it be a political difference and not a gender difference? I'm sure you would be the first to say that conservative females are torn down in the same way as your list of men above so it's not a gendered thing then.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:58 AM
-1

I'm a guy so I'm not blaming men like the other reply below. As a man, I haven't been forced to work dangerous jobs, which is my point. Most men have not been forced into dangerous jobs. Just because more men do dangerous jobs, doesn't mean you're forced to and it absolutely isn't women's fault if you do. Take responsibility for yourself. Women didn't force any men into oil refineries or underwater drilling or whatever else. If you don't want to do it, don't do it. The market will increase the p…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:55 AM
1

Giving an excuse for why men leave families doesn't mean that men don't leave families more.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:50 AM
0

I absolutely agree that there's a lot of inequality. You're right. My examples are cherry picked ? How can I give anything that isn't cherry picked? I can't list all men on earth, so I gave examples where his point doesn't apply. The point is that it's not reality because there's countless examples where it doesn't work. He's also given 0 examples btw. "Moreover, those men were lauded by a small niche group while being detested by the mainstream" There followings aren't small and I don't think t…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:30 AM
-38

Donald trump, jay-z, Justin Bieber, Vladimir zelenski, Robert Downey Jr, Kevin Samuels (until he died), Literally an endless list of currently worshipped men who did things for themselves (whether or not you like them). As a man, why don't you express yourself with your own examples of when you have been disposable. Rather than being vague, retreating and then saying that the opponent will never understand. If you can only convince people who already agree with you, then I got to say it makes se…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:48 AM
-39

Who are you listening to? There are so many examples of men who we like that lived for themselves. Steve jobs literally ditched his daughter and he's a pos but everyone respects what he did. He did the thing you complained about women doing and he's worshipped Basically any historical male figure too. Caesar, Alexander the great, che Guevara, Douglas macarthur. Every male athlete, every male superstar, etc. They weren't doing it for women or family, they did it to pursue their personal goals, an…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:28 AM
-59

Assuming you live in the first world, when have you actually been treated disposable in any real way? The draft may exist, but you haven't been drafted. There's a lot more men who ditch their families than women. Also, I'm pretty sure no one thinks a deadbeat mum is a girlboss I get the complaints may be coming from some personal feelings but I don't think this is actually happening
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:21 AM
1

May I ask why you think that?
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:27 AM
1

I personally don't see the similarities between this issue and the draft system but maybe you could explain it a bit more. I agree it would've been better to have a slightly different set-up, maybe more stalls in the female's bathroom because, at least in my experience, there is a larger demand for female toilets in general. My point is that this is such a weak issue to put forward. I can see this being used to show how petty MRAs can be, much like we show how weak Feminist arguments can be when…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 11:40 PM
-6

I disagree. I think this is like the petty stuff we dislike about the feminist movement. I think the situation is comparable to car insurance price differences between men and women. Men use it more/ in a different way and are treated appropriately. I wound prefer a system that doesn't encroach on men's toilets, sure but this is not the issue we should make our stand on. I can see legitimate reasons for this and it only makes us look silly if we stoop to the level we complain about
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:32 PM
5

Yeah that is what I thought too. Reading through the comments here I feel like I watched a different debate. They were both really level headed, even to the point where it was uneventful and boring.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:48 PM
1

I thought gender was just a social construct...
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:50 PM
1

Because it is funny to us and that is why we subscribed to this sub
/r/MensRights24/12/16 02:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter