TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Human_Earthling_ Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by _Human_Earthling_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The company’s net sales rose 3.6% to $17.09 billion in the fourth quarter, beating analysts’ average estimate of $16.86 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv. This was disappointing to find out :/ Link: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-proctergamble-results/pg-posts-strong-sales-takes-8-billion-gillette-writedown-idUSKCN1UP1AD
/r/MensRights16/09/19 12:36 AM
1

What's this about people boycotting Gillete?
/r/MensRights15/09/19 11:50 PM
1

Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 12:08 PM
1

Do you have a link for the Black Ribbon stats? Wouldn't mind taking a look at that.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 12:00 PM
1

Here is my 2 cents and hopefully you get some value out of it. This isn't what feminism really is and not everyone would have reacted the same as I would have A few people in the comments are saying that's exactly what feminism is. I have to strongly disagree. The truth is, feminism in practice means a lot of things to different people. There are positive aspects to the practice of feminism and there are plenty of men and women who identify as feminists who treat it as gender equity/equality. So…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 11:39 AM
1

It is also good to note that "not guilty" means "not guilty beyond reasonable doubt". The onus to prove each element of an offence is a much higher threshold to meet than in civil procedures which are "on the balance of probabilities". So "not guilty" should not be interpreted as "definitely innocent" but more accurately "one of the elements does not meet the threshold of beyond reasonable doubt". What is the difference between 'prosecution' and 'trial'? The terminology in my country is differen…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 08:48 AM
1

Feminists and researchers on rape statistics have heavily criticized the statistics as well, shaming the report for the degree to which it manipulates the information to suppress an accurate number of false rapes. One example to evidence this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/09/the-truth-about-a-viral-graphic-on-rape-statistics/ The Enliven Project has also acknowledged some of the faults in their methods, but refuse to update the study with a correct methodology, cla…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 08:36 AM
1

It doesn't need to be made into criminal act to achieve that though. You could write the law to give police the authority to detain an individual who is reasonably believed to be a suicide risk, and can be released pending investigation by a medical professional (psychologist/psychiatrist) or be placed in treatment. Does the state own your person? I am not sure you realise just how big and complicated a question that is.... see pro choice / pro life debates, penalising or treating drug offenders…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 07:03 AM
1

I reread and I don't think so.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 06:53 AM
1

It's not. And I think it is great that you have a hypothesis. Most people don't think about these issues deeply enough. Unfortunately, in this case, your hypothesis is in conflict with the available research and stance of health organisations on a matter that has been thoroughly investigated. Hence why I have to disagree that what you are putting forward is less harmful to suicide prevention for men and women.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 09:46 AM
1

I read the article and don't see where Jordan Peterson advances the argument that suicide ought to be a crime or that the word "commit" should be used.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 08:39 AM
1

You are leading with the assumption that the change in terminology makes people feel more positively toward suicide. I did not come across anything in the article or my own research indicating this. As for your second paragraph, you have essentially formed a hypothesis for why you think the change in language would be harmful. My issue with your proposed hypothesis is it is completely unsupported. If you look at the articles citations, it will take you to various organisations and groups who hav…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 08:12 AM
1

The research on this subject matter supports the articles argument: That in the fight for suicide prevention, the terminology used by media of "committing suicide" is harmful and that "death by suicide" is less harmful. One example of an organisation that whole-heartedly supports this position: http://reportingonsuicide.org Other comments seem to advance the position "you can't make me say it this way" which I think misses the point. If you want to carry on saying "committed suicide" you just ar…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:04 AM
1

If you say "Jack committed suicide" you aren't implying anyone but Jack committed the act. People don't usually say "Jill caused Jack to commit suicide". Your third point, while it makes sense, seems redundant? The article is promoting what health organisations (the groups that are the experts on suicide prevention) advise. It's not really making any claims that it is unlawful to use a particular term, but presenting the facts as to why the terminology being used is harmful.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 06:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter