TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Mellex_ Archive

View 12 posts and 320 comments by _Mellex_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
421

Activism/Support_Mellex_/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:16 AM
196

Progress_Mellex_/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:29 AM
178

Opinion_Mellex_/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:35 PM
98

Edu./Occu._Mellex_/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:44 AM
87

Social Issues_Mellex_/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:32 PM
83

Social Issues_Mellex_/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:05 PM
82

Marriage/Children_Mellex_/r/MensRights21/10/19 06:14 AM
37

Social Issues_Mellex_/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:31 PM
31

_Mellex_/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:58 PM
19

_Mellex_/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:15 PM
11

_Mellex_/r/MensRights16/12/16 11:18 AM
5

False Accusation_Mellex_/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:34 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Kinda hard to call Peterson "right wing" when he can ultimately sit down with self-described anarchists and end up agreeing with them at a fundamental level. https://youtu.be/3cVr2Qp_ic8?si=6zqfWvgFBXq3bw3z Chances are you won't watch the video and probably won't following the chaotic stream of consciousness because your own cognitive biases have stopped you from actually listening to people.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 05:03 PM
1

When Dad is in charge the only thing he knows how to make is steak, so that baby gotta grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:44 PM
4

HEALTHY BONES
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:43 PM
4

More babies with creepy teeth?
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:42 PM
22

The people who argue that don't understand the law, nor do they attempt to have honest discussions.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 12:20 AM
3

And he kicked her while she was down. Bot's gotta learn that lesson. Society might give you a break but only if you go shot for shot.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 08:42 AM
6

Fucking Al Franken was forced to resign from the senate because of a photo he took with a girl. That's a charitable way of describing it lol But yes, his was a lesser "crime" that this hypocrite's.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 08:40 AM
2

I believe so, but it's more like the state asks for it.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:42 AM
3

Wild ride
/r/MensRights25/10/19 05:51 AM
14

Didn't I read the exact opposite just yesterday???
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:14 AM
2

Then why state it in gendered terms? Do women get a say in other women's right to chose? The wording says men have no say in the discussion. Full stop. Which is absurd. Whether or not you agree, there is tons to discuss. Everything from term limits, to rights to financial abortions, to questions of morality.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:27 PM
9

I've voted NDP most of my adult life, but it's stuff like this that gets one questioning why they should even bother.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 06:18 AM
1

Yeah, let's form a government with this guy.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 06:11 AM
3

Social engineering. Kids. Financial reasons. Benefits.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:55 PM
1

PERHAPS
/r/MensRights25/07/19 02:24 PM
1

He wasn't sending nude photos to underage girls?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 07:05 PM
11

Who?
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:02 PM
42

If it makes you all feel any better, /s a lot of that money isn't going towards helping women with cancer 🤗
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:42 PM
14

Checkmate
/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:43 PM
2

Obviously men are just way better at getting away with crimes. This is patriarchy through the legal system.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:37 AM
6

Pretty weak example, but okay. I've been on the internet long enough to know that people who question the historical facts about the Holocaust aren't necessarily deniers and they're definitely not always Nazis.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:16 AM
22

Daughter might get breast cancer; better take her to the doctors for a mastectomy.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 04:45 AM
4

inb4 "Stonetoss is a Nazi so he must be wrong about everything" What am I missing here?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 04:42 AM
25

That man's name? George mother fucking Washington
/r/MensRights25/05/19 09:22 PM
1

Yes, officer, I tore her shirt open and broke her ribs. You raped her? No, sir; I gave her CPR
/r/MensRights24/05/19 09:42 AM
40

The fetus is half the woman's DNA but considered entirely her body to most pro-choice people. It doesn't make a lick of sense. In Canada, fetuses have zero rights as long as they are considered pre-born. If a man murdered a fetus I didn't harm the mother, he could theoretically get out of paying child support and he avoid any and all homicide charges. Literal clown world.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 09:24 PM
1

Some men have also slipped women abortifactient drugs. Of course when this happens it's treated as attempted murder usually. Not in Canada. The best the courts could get is assault on the mother. Unborn children have zero rights.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:24 AM
1

Not really because there are other laws that protect the mother. I remember a case where a guy got convicted for "poisoning" his pregnant GF with plan B. I would take a guess that if you found the details of said story, it wasn't in Canada.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:23 AM
1

Not sure how it would work in Canada. The unborn child has literally zero personhood and thus zero legal protections. Zero.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:22 AM
1

People usually don't talk about Canada lol While the US is arguing over viability and shit, Canada refuses to charge people who stab fetuses to death for the death of the unborn child.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:20 AM
1

Illegal, yes, but the lesser of two evils for anyone disgruntled enough.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:03 PM
3

The supreme court of Canada has referred to unborn non-humans as "children", so we have effectively created a paradox where not all canadian children are human, all because no one wants to anger the abortion activists.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:01 PM
1

I don't know, I'm not a serial killer, but I know people can and do get very, very desperate. Anything from kicking her, yes, to some sort of poison? The method doesn't actually matter. Someone looking to get out of 18+ years of threats of jail and wage garnishing, or having a child with someone they potentially hate, what's a fine and a year and a half for assault?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:01 PM
1

Back on up keyboard warrior and read my comment again in the context of: if we lived in a world where a man can "financially abort" a child but we meet a scenario where the man wants to keep the child but the woman does not.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:12 AM
2

That's not physical, its mental/emotional. Being physically confined against your will isnt physical???
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:11 PM
1

While I agree, it becomes a slippery slope just like abortion is today. Imagine that a man has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they cannot financially support a child and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that they never intended to have a child even though and they engaged in sexual activities. The next step would be, just like abortion today, that a man would be allowed to financially abort his child because of some loosey-goosey definition of mental health. And then we'd end up back to…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:08 PM
4

Should we bind sex with parental responsibility? Thats reallly what should be the question. Yes. Every person on this planet understands that vaginal sex leads to babies. There are a myriad other ways for people to have orgasms that will never lead to pregnancy.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:04 PM
-1

I was thinking that if the man wants the child, the woman should have to carry it, give it to the man and she should pay child support. No, if she is burdened with taking the child to term, that should exempt her from child support.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:03 PM
10

Don't forget the cases where male victims of rape are forced to pay child support 🤗
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:58 PM
8

The response boiled down to, ‘zomg you can’t tell a woman what she can and can’t do with her body!’ What people can't seem to wrap their head around is stealing my money and threatening me with jail because "actions have consequences" is also a violation of my autonomy. I'd rather be pregnant for 9 months enjoy the freedoms of modern society than rationing a loaf of bread over a week because the courts have access to my bank account.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:57 PM
1

Definitely reading that later. Thanks.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:52 PM
1

What's your site?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 02:01 PM
3

Dude got brigaded lol
/r/MensRights26/02/19 11:30 AM
0

Unless you're angry lesbians lol
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:51 PM
19

There is a sect of feminism that adheres to the idea that all penetration is rape.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 04:42 PM
3

1:59 am Bitch just hooked up with someone and is feeling regretful lol
/r/MensRights22/02/19 04:41 PM
1

There's a way for intersectionality to go right? I mean, sure. It sometimes sucks being a man. Historically, it has sucked to be black. Ergo, it might suck more to be a black man than a white man (given whatever context you want; it's not important). It can be valuable to see how cultural or social identities intersect. That is one of the reasons for that type of scholarship. The feminist/Marxist narrative about oppressors isn't inherent to intersectionality. Splitting up people into different i…
/r/MensRights20/02/19 05:51 PM
10

Intersectionality gone wrong is tearing the American left into pieces lol
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:46 PM
23

men help Does Not Compute
/r/MensRights07/02/19 01:29 PM
18

Good one, kid. I bet you're the cleverest guy in 7th grade. I was, yeah lol
/r/MensRights26/01/19 04:17 AM
111

Welcome to the block list, dumbass. top keks
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:16 AM
1

so me being pro (or at least not anti) some right wing young guy makes me a leftist? Because... being violent but trying to take the moral high ground where was I violent? I was actively trying to oppose the other moron's violence lol. Are you sure you are replying to the right guy here? Holy shit, dude. Calm your tits. I wasn't talking about you; I was commenting on what you said.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:49 PM
16

It is unironically ok to punch trump supporters I'm sure that will work out for you lol
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:27 PM
2

Making baseless claims, being violent but trying to take the moral high ground sounds like the American Left's M.O. right now.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:26 PM
15

Do you go outside wearing a hazmat suit and earmuffs? 😂
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:23 PM
5

TIMESTAMP WHERE
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:22 PM
-11

naw, just implied it, called him a piece of shit, made baseless assertions and then tried to take the moral high ground lol Found the Leftist lol
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:21 PM
45

Curious to what they really did wrong? Dared to be white, male and Trump supporters. You know, the demographic that the media has convinced half the country that it's okay to punch.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:18 PM
30

Some rando's youtube vid Tim Pool, a rando? ayy lmao https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool Pool's coverage has been carried and syndicated by multiple mainstream outlets including NBC, Reuters, Al Jazeera, and Time.[7][8] He was covered by Fast Company and Wired.[7][9][10] In 2013, Pool joined Vice Media producing and hosting content as well as developing new methods of reporting.[11] In 2014, he joined Fusion TV as Director of Media innovation and Senior Correspondent.[12][13][14] Pool was n…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:16 PM
2

I'll copystrike you, but sure.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 08:12 PM
9

Ah yes let's take people seriously based on net worth It's a proxy for audience size, which is a proxy for celebrity, which is what this discussion is about, you snarky dingleberry lol
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:41 PM
10

Not just biparental, but social, intelligent mammals with relatively long lifespans and gestation periods.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:52 PM
0

Comparative psychology: how does it work? lol
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:49 PM
25

I feel bad for both him, his wife, childern and ya'll for feeling bad about him, his wife and childern.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:58 PM
14

you wanna give a sauce there? you wanna read the comments there? OP posted "sauce" 6 hours ago.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:23 AM
4

Why is it misleading?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:00 AM
8

Studying feminism is just a subset of anthropology. That's being very generous lol
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:17 AM
29

This guy fucks lol
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:28 AM
3

Fourteen. Teen. Teenager.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:53 PM
3

Banging children keeps you warm. You left out the children part 14-year-olds aren't children; but that is neither here nor there when the issue is the legal matter of age of consent and positions of power/trust.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 06:13 AM
0

I saw Sky News (British news outlet) discussing this study on TV yesterday evening. The leader of some Feminist group, and I remember it clearly said that 'these kind of studies invoke prejudice'. Guess Science is anti feminist now. Are you not familiar with the Science Wars? This postmodern, intersectionality bullshit has been plaguing the sciences since the 60s.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:27 PM
11

he The judge is a woman.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 12:12 PM
33

Even if the doctor is right and her sexual gratification wasn't derived from children but rather the humiliation she felt - it doesn't matter. This is a person with no qualms about producing child pornography in which she engages in sexual acts with toddlers. Even if she's not a paedophile, she's engaging in padeophilic acts. Which is all the law fucking cares about in the first place!?!? It's not a crime to be sexually attracted to children; you can't make states of mind illegal. One must act b…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 12:11 PM
20

How many times we going to see this exact post? We get it. First time seeing this myself. So kindly fuck off with your faux outrage. Not all of us are on Reddit 24/7
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:24 PM
-3

what do you consider most flawed about the FBI investigation? Which one lol
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:34 PM
3

Whenever there is a relationship where only one partner is violent (nonreciprocal), the victim is more likely to be a man.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:50 PM
7

Very much true http://newscastmedia.com/domestic-violence.htm https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_against_men The survey found for "any physical violence", a rate of 31.2%, of which 68.6% was bidirectional, 9.9% was perpetrated by men only, and 21.4% by women only This shit has been public knowledge for decades now.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:48 PM
7

Men outrank women in the unilateral, nonreciprocal category.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:14 PM
0

You might be the only one
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:43 PM
-1

Car accidents are rare. Should I not wear a seatbelt? What the fuck? Car accidents are not rare at all. You're two to three times more likely to die in a vehicle than you are by a weapon (like a gun). It's something like 1 in 645 will die in a car accident in their lifetime, nevermind injuries caused by not having a seat belt.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:40 PM
12

Assault for dancing, wtf? Maybe he's pro-life lol
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:32 PM
3

What's a university that pushes for feminist ideology? University of Toronto.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:00 AM
0

Cognitive dissonance isn't a "buzzword" 😂 it's one of the few useful and robust research topics to come out of the otherwise garbage, a-theoretical discipline of Social Psychology.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:57 AM
-1

But tell us how you really feel
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:17 AM
2

I'd wager I could pay 6 women $1000 each to accuse someone of raping them. Heck, maybe even $100 each. There's no possible way they'd get penalized for it and they're now richer. It's a win/win. People's morals are easily manipulated, especially when you frame it as making sure the "wrong" people don't have power. Now imagine $700,000+
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:16 AM
3

But then were you not paying attention the entire time before his name was mentioned? The guy asked for sources so he could educate himself and you decide to be an ass instead? 😂 Okie dokie smokie.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:08 AM
4

It allows women to ditch fathers without the negative financial consequences.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:47 AM
22

The important question is why 70+% of black children in America grow up without a father. Welfare state enables it. War on Drugs exacerbates it. Modern Feminism glorifies it.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:45 AM
112

You might expect photos of kids shaving or some shit 😂 not being shirtless and sweaty or in bed.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:31 PM
7

He should demand an apology from her lol
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:37 PM
4

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:35 PM
3

What's the logic? Walk through it out loud, because you, and at least one other person, seem to have missed the point completely in favour of some strange concern trolling.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:37 PM
11

Your wording sounds like you don't think any women should be allowed to teach? No it doesn't. He's pointing out the mammoth-sized hypocrisy surrounding the fear of leaving children sitting next to men in a well-protected, supervised public area while female teachers continue to have sex with their underage students with what seems to be like relative impunity. It's far more charitable to interpret the OP as saying that men should be allowed to sit next to young strangers on a plane.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:35 PM
9

Did you miss the memo? Meritocracies are racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 03:52 PM
22

Loophole
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:54 PM
-12

BECAUSE BLACK LIVES MATTER --MSNBC
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:08 PM
36

That kinda happens when you dominate your sport for a decade lol What the fuck does she think should happen?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:07 PM
-10

Not enough people are giving the crowd shit for booing. Fucking Americans. Your hyper-partisan bullshit is making ya'll assholes.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:06 PM
80

"Asian privilege"
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:04 PM
0

Men in general get the majority of online abuse. The bulk of men are the majority of a lot of bad, terrible, annoying things. This shouldn't be surprising to anyone anymore.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:22 PM
8

No they aren't. They're just lactation devices. Don't be that person. Please.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:19 AM
2

I don't know about you, but the babies I know aren't having sex and thus are not as risk of STDs. Again, the argument stands: why do something to an infant that can wait when they're older. There are other non-invasive measures for stopping STDs.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:21 PM
9

So let someone decide for themselves at 18 if they would rather cut a part of their penis off instead of wash.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:05 PM
10

Find me a feminist that rejects patriarchy theory, then we can talk about the validity and value of such a boiled-down definition. If we take that definition at face value, then approximately less than 20% of Americans want gender equality because fewer and fewer people are identifying as Feminist.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:09 PM
9

The goal of feminism was "equal rights for woman". By fighting/dismantling/overturning the patriarchy, given that women have been oppressed since the dawn of time. And there's the rub: if you disagree with those presuppositions, then you aren't a feminist despite wanting equal rights. There is an entire theoretical backdrop to feminism. It's more than just wanting something. Much like wanting to help the poor doesn't necessarily mean you are a Christian.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:38 PM
15

Feminism is an ideology that comes with many presuppositions. For example, if you desire gender equality but reject the modern portrayal of the patriarch, then you aren't a feminist in the academic or political sense. This idea that wanting gender equality means you are a feminist is as egregious as saying that valuing the family's role in society means you are a Republican or that wanting to help the poor makes one a Christian.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:37 PM
52

So you're an egalitarian, not a feminist.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:59 AM
12

Propaganda trains people to have emotional reactions to certain stimuli. To a normal person, hearing economic numbers are just free-floating stats. You go, "huh, neat" and go on your merry way. A brainwashed individual is one who has been trained to scoff or sneer at anything remotely positive against "the enemy".
/r/MensRights11/08/18 06:55 AM
5

Fuck the teaching license. How did she avoid fucking jail!?!?!?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:43 AM
3

Greetings, fellow robot ruubit FTFY
/r/MensRights30/07/18 01:28 AM
51

Women are worse off because they retain the family home. Wow! Imagine the chutzpah needed to formulate that argument! How do I handle all these adult responsibilities (after I initiated the divorce and after I took the children away from him)?????
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:14 AM
105

How do I handle all these adult responsibilities (after I initiated the divorce and after I took the children away from him)?????
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:13 AM
72

Holy fuck how messed up can you be to claim women suffer more in divorce court, despite overwhelming evidence that says otherwise, and then shovel your unfounded bullshit into the public. Because "experts", and because Annie Greenberg is so brave 👏
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:09 AM
0

I was never confused about whether or not that really happened. Are you sure? Because most of characters are based on real, important people and most of the battles reference historical events. Focusing on the fantasy elements of the game mechanics misses the point entirely.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:51 AM
-5

I think you're not giving young people enough credit. They'd have to be complete fools to think video games are an appropriate place to learn history lessons. You really don't think there are people out there who learnt more History from the Assassin's Creed series than high school? A lot developers go out of their way to painstakingly implement realism into their games. Hell, even stupid hack and slash games like Dynasty Warriors is full of actual history.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:16 PM
2

Fuck Takei, but that Tweet is at least worth a chuckle.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 01:51 PM
27

🤔 do you ban lesbians from women-only gyms?
/r/MensRights11/07/18 02:28 PM
0

The next time a woman comes in for a cut, just shave their fucking head lol
/r/MensRights11/07/18 02:26 PM
8

Legal precedent can be priceless.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 07:22 AM
5

I read that as "bees knees" some reason.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:51 PM
5

yep women have candy drawers 😂 repaired propellers as a summer job in my youth. Can't count the number of times I left a Twix in my overall's pocket.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:50 PM
5

Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:59 AM
20

Source on that? Because that is, as the kids say these days, "spicy".
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:12 AM
2

Jesus Fuck. Everyone saying she didn't get charged for "rape" had me thinking she raped him with a machete. But now I don't know which scenario is worse...
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:13 PM
2

Shout out to Boogie2988
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:56 AM
9

Jordan Peterson, the evangelist of white male resentment [...] I stopped reading 😂
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:32 PM
10

This shit is oozing into popular culture too. Apparently minorities can't relate to movie or video game characters on any intellectual or emotional level unless they share skin colours. Movie reviewers should only review movies where actors or actresses share the reviewers' genitalia.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:59 PM
4

Wasn't the tipping point with Aziz Ansari?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:49 PM
1

A silent no is consent, my dude 😀
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:48 PM
224

I mean, domestic violence shelters are starting to accommodate pets now. Men can't be too far behind 🤞
/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:27 PM
2

True, but doesn't it give you pause that every single father out there never had the opportunity to not be a father (sans social, financial, judicial punishment)?
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:25 AM
80

It's strange to me that there are "stereotypical" or "expected" ways of thinking. Women are "supposed" to believe 'x', 'y' and 'z'. African Americans are "supposed" to believe 'x', 'y' and 'z'. And if you don't, you become a social outcast, labeled a "MRA" or "Uncle Tom. Is that the ultimate goal of identity politics: divide through intersectionality, exacerbate our tribalistic tendencies, and control through narratives?
/r/MensRights16/06/18 05:49 PM
1

That's a good question, one that I don't have a good answer readily available. I mean, nothing in this world is acted upon by only one factor. I would imagine that when you factor in the welfare state and the disastrous "War on Drugs" (which disproportionately affects poor communities), it might create a situation where the family unit is disrupted and then put in a position where it can't properly recover (or there is no incentive to recover) Factor in that when you flood the market with 20+ tr…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 09:47 PM
3

And let's not forget that the black generation after Jim Crow were doing pretty well for themselves, all things considered. This has been a point made over and over again by black economists who don't happen to be Democrats: the Democratic welfare state has done more to harm the black populations than Jim Crow ever did. Agree with that at face value or not, but people should at least look into the empirical evidence (e.g., marriage rates vs. single-mother families and education levels).
/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:45 PM
8

The excuse is that people are still suffering the effects of historical oppression. For example, ”women or blacks would be doing much better today if they had had equality back then.” Worse, it’s “women or blacks would be doing much better today if YOUR ancestors hadn’t done My ancestors came to the US and eventually ended up in Canada. They fled on rusty, sinking boat and didn't know a word of English. It was either that or get killed by Nazis (they are Dutch). They had literally nothing. As a …
/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:09 PM
6

The progressive snake is a cannibalistic little shit, isn't it?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:57 AM
-4

You...you do know we're talking about a cartoon, right? A cartoon, mind you, that literally has the in its caption, "attractive". You find me an attractive man who couldn't theoretically overpower three women in a fight and I'll sell you a ticket to the moon.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:03 AM
25

Any recent examples of this that makes you say that? Men not taking "no" for an answer is a hallmark of chick flicks and rom coms, and is probably how a lot of our dads would describe their pursuits of our moms lol
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:41 AM
60

I feel like that dude could take at least two of those women on, and at least tire out the third, if shit hit the fan. That's obviously the difference for the perceived double standard.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:49 AM
7

How the fuck do you even measure that? You're just talking out of your ass, mate 😂
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:28 AM
-3

Then exterminate all women. Can't be unsafe if ya'll dead ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights01/06/18 08:49 PM
9

Kidnapped by [Obama's] government FTFY
/r/MensRights28/05/18 11:11 PM
13

Took me a minute there lol
/r/MensRights28/05/18 11:10 PM
3

Quick, have the entire class identify as women.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:34 AM
20

An enemy of my enemy something something...lol
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:33 AM
2

Cool, thanks. So the only thing my memory fudged on was lumping Shapiro in with the non-White Nationalists who attempted to adopt the label without knowing it's full history (like Milo) The only thing I disagree with is laying the blame on Trump for the popularity of the term. The Democrats and the Southern Poverty Law Center did way more to push it into the mainstream.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:38 AM
2

It is an empirically verifiable fact that Shapiro is the on the receiving end of the most hate on Twitter from the "actual" Alt-Right (mostly because he's a devout Jew). Someone actually crunched the numbers lol. Something Shapiro likes to bring up whenever someone calls him a Nazi.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:22 AM
1

Please do.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:32 AM
1

As far as I'm aware, yes, Spencer (and his white nationalist ilk) did coin the term. Which is why the more meme-ish Alt-Right and your alternative media types (like Milo or Watson) shyed away from the term after that fact was brought to their attention. But no one pays attention to Spencer, so of course nobody knew that.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:32 AM
1

What's the correct timeline?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:24 AM
2

Did you just gloss over my entire post about how I divided the umbrella term into it's subtypes? He's Alt-Right in that he doesn't seem to like establishment Republicans in the slightest.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:00 AM
6

"Alt-Right" as a popular term emerged as a way to describe alternative Republicans in the United States during the recent election. (edit note: thus, the problem out of the gate is that the term is trying to abide by the false dichotomy that the only thing that exists are Democrats and Republicans). Think Milo Yiannopoulos, and your Paul Joseph Watsons, and your Ben Shapiros. Socially conservative, but not necessarily religious, and leaning more libertarian. Anti-Feminist. More or less anti-esta…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:35 PM
4

I think the take away lesson of the article and your examples is she should open her mouth as little as possible lol
/r/MensRights01/05/18 04:27 AM
-3

I mean, she's not ugly by any stretch of the imagination 🤔
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:55 AM
3

Whenever I tell people organisations and media outlets constantly conflate same work pay with average earnings, and that they are intentionally being misleading, I get laughed at like a Moon Landing Hoaxer. This is just another example to add to the pile.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:15 PM
17

It's a very long-winded way to say, "Not real socialism".
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:38 PM
1

Was it ever being disputed?? They've been running around Toronto dressed up like ANTIFA for at least a decade.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:36 PM
2

DELELTE THIS NOW /r/videos mod
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:50 PM
19

reporting what you've seen in reality is perpetuating stereotypes lmao mate Seeing as I've taken zero sick or personal days ever, yeah, most women have taken more time off than me personally.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:12 PM
136

I've been working with woman all my life, at various levels. I can say anecdotally that they do, indeed, take more time off. Migraines and "female issues" are the most popular reasons.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:59 AM
2

Infect first, ask questions later. lololol or not at all
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:52 PM
2

🤔 they banned you unironically?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 04:25 AM
11

R.I.P.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:20 AM
5

Science and Videos in one day proving that they are overrun by SJWs.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:56 PM
8

Thread locked and nuked. Cancer mods didn't like comments like this getting downvoted: Let’s remind ourselves that the pragmatic reality is that women suffer violence from men at rates far greater than male victims.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:55 PM
22

It was tagged with "Ad". That might have something to do with it but I doubt it. A compilation video of several Japanese gum commercials was a the top of the sub yesterday afternoon. My guess it was removed because of "politics".
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:52 PM
90

Top comment was clearly hate speech Wow, pretty powerful stuff. Very disturbing that people thought domestic violence is funny when the roles are reversed.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:51 PM
65

Mods are literal cancer. People laugh when others say most default subs are taken over by "Communist SJWs", but anyone who browses subreddits dedicated to archiving removed threads and mod abuse will have a hard time denying it.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:50 PM
43

Wow, pretty powerful stuff. Very disturbing that people thought domestic violence is funny when the roles are reversed. REMOVE THE HATE SPEECH NOW!!!
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:48 PM
1

https://imgur.com/a/DtEGM
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:07 AM
4

I'm sorry you took the time and effort to respond to my obviously sarcastic post. I thought I made it as clear as humanly possible.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:51 AM
5

So he can get all the abundant benefits that come with being a dude. Duh
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:25 AM
16

Can he she change back later without repercussion?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:46 PM
5

Redpills in real time.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:05 PM
9

omegalulz
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:33 AM
14

please tell me it's face creams lol
/r/MensRights26/03/18 02:51 AM
42

foreskins used for female beauty products u wot m8?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:52 AM
6

It usually has a handicap symbol though. The one on the left probably has a changing table because the patriarchy lol
/r/MensRights17/03/18 05:40 PM
5

I always get consent before beating the shit out of woman.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 04:21 AM
111

No one is stopping them Actually, women are stopping other woman lol
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:27 PM
9

This gonna be good.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:44 PM
7

You know damn well why lol
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:42 PM
-1

-21 -40 👏👏👏 Yeah, this thread is completely organic, free from brigading. Yep. Yep.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:37 PM
5

TL;DR on the "feminist budget"?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:35 AM
12

Anyone paying attention already knew that this was the case. http://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/douglas-todd-b-c-s-domestic-violence-programs-based-on-false-theory
/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:57 AM
24

sigh lol
/r/MensRights25/02/18 10:47 AM
9

People with an extra sex chromosome aren't a different sex anymore than an albino African-American is a new race/ethnicity. It's a genetic abnormality, and a rare one at that. And just because you are a woman who likes to play baseball doesn't mean you invented a new gender. There's still only two "ingredients": male and female.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:27 PM
36

It potentially stops evidence from making it to the jury.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 06:57 PM
21

I see she's still verified 🤔 By Twitter's own logic, that's an endorsement.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:48 PM
10

It's just worth emphasizing that the student didn't actually violate Bill C-16. The professors are talking out of their ass. She may have violated some kind of policy at the university, but that's a whole other issue. The main point, however, is that these university policies, and even Bill C-16 itself, are worded so vaguely and their ill-defined contents so nebulous that they are asking to be abused by those with an axe to grind.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:53 PM
31

22-year-old female grad student and TA shows class 5 minute excerpt from an hour long debate/discussion video about gender pronouns featuring Jordan Peterson that aired on national TV about a year ago. She is then taken into a closed-door-meeting with several professors who explain to her that she perpetuated transphobia and caused harm for showing the video in a neural manner in her communication/critical thinking class. (One of the speakers compares Peterson to Hitler.) She secretly records th…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:36 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:28 PM
1

TIL
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:24 AM
3

Sorry, I was under the impression that people see the image along with the title. I'm on mobile though.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:34 AM
11

Well I've been saying for years that men need to step aside and let women run things for a time. Men have been running things since the beginning and look where we are. We need to elect more women to positions of power. Women are better decision makers and women are better in crisis situations. Believe me, women could balance the budget, end the pointless wars, negotiate with the Chinese, and still do three loads of laundry and have dinner on the table at six. ~~~ I believe the prevailing though…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:07 PM
3

It's a bit of a stereotype that you guys have shit sex Ed., eh?
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:19 PM
2

...what?
/r/MensRights02/11/17 08:42 AM
1

🤔 what country?
/r/MensRights02/11/17 08:41 AM
63

"It's okay to be a man", anyone? 🤔
/r/MensRights02/11/17 08:39 AM
6

This is the stupidest comment section I have seen on this sub in a long time.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:29 AM
8

What's NHS? Should have scrolled one comment further...
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:24 PM
-3

Why would it be a "stupid" law, though? Because 20 year olds (save for mental of psychological disabilities) can obviously consent. Why? Because "consent" is rooted in way more concepts other than the legal aspect, be it biological, psychological, sociological and philosophical concepts that are necessarily independent of the legal definition. The law refers to all these other elements; the law does not define them, which is exactly why you can call it a "stupid law". And it's exactly why an act…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:45 PM
4

If the government pushes the age of consent to 25, would that automatically make it so 20 year olds can't consent? The law is a guideline, not ordained Truth.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:56 PM
2

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/oxford-student-judge-suggested-bright-prison-spared-jail-stabbing/ #1 spot on the frontpage (or at least mine).
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:02 AM
3

And all these women making huge dollars are going to spend their money on what, exactly? No need to upgrade to a bigger home; no need for a second or third vehicle; no need for daycare and schools will surely close. The healthcare bubble bursts. Something tells me that such a huge shift would affect wages too. There's no guarantee that it works out for the better. You can't just play around with hypotheticals and keep everything the same except one variable. The real world is more complicated.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 02:49 PM
-2

Businesses don't value families? What the fuck lolol Who hell consumes products? Families. Costco, Amazon, Wal-Mart, you name it, are making big bucks because families of 5 need school supplies, holiday decorations, furniture, family packs of chicken breasts...I could go on. The housing market hinges on the expectation that people planning families upgrade. Businesses don't value families THAT'S WHY MARKETING COMPANIES PAY BILLIONS TO TARGET FAMILIES Makes sense 😂😂😂 Stupidest shit I've read on R…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 02:44 PM
1

The Greyhound guy? Yeah, I'm not an medical or psychiatric expert so I'm going to have to trust that they know what they're doing there.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:24 PM
13

And often you serve a longer sentence. Insanity plea is not some sweet deal.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 05:15 PM
1

*only issue one needs to mention
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:48 AM
2

But the issue isn't about how much it hurts or the likelihood of complications. The only issue is consent.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 02:01 AM
11

OP isn't necessarily accusing Conan of unironically using a double standard. More likely the intent is to draw attention to the joke which itself is highlighting a very real attitude and social blindspot.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:18 AM
20

Yeah, fuck the other men that no one talks about who will likely commit suicide too 🤔...waaaaait
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:16 AM
21

If I can't spread my legs, then I respectfully request that it be socially acceptable for me to reach down into my pants and adjust myself.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 08:59 PM
3

This guy shops.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:21 AM
32

Fish bowl
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:21 PM
3

Gender equality is "egalitarianism".
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:53 PM
4

Is this post being brigaded or something because some real stupid shit is being said (like who you responded to) and upvoted.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:49 PM
2

That you think the post lists "an extreme few" is less sad that your ignorance is getting so many upvotes. What is happening in this subreddit?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:46 PM
42

I believe Netflix's official comment on the matter is that they didn't edit the episode. Who ever owns the rights to the show are the only one's allowed to do so.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:28 AM
42

I just commented on "Dear White People" so forgive me for copy and pasting my own comment: Not entirely sure about "Dear White People" because I've only caught the odd episode whilst my GF watches it, but I do believe the moral of the story ends up being that the black community is at fault for the strained race relationships at the school. I've seen it described as, "Dear White People [...never mind]".
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:22 AM
1

I don't know about you, but I have often ended up supporting creators via DVD sales and other means after watching something for free. The former wouldn't have ever happened in those cases without the latter. And now that Netflix won't stream it, his pirating my end up being a way to reach more people.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:29 AM
15

Diversity improves workplace atmosphere? What's the working definition of "atmosphere" because I work with a first-generation Irish man, a Hispanic woman, a black homosexual, among other shit I could list, and my workplace is a fucking disaster.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:22 AM
3

Yet to took the time to write all that ayy lmao
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:18 AM
2

But not on Netlfix... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_Ky1rsVoAAJnGN.jpg
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:08 AM
1

http://m.videobash.com/video/show/id/42857
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:50 AM
21

The sad part is the people I could share this with would just be shocked at the claim that a man can have a strong emotional connection to his children.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:47 AM
3

Don't moms kill their own children at a higher rate then dads?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 02:14 AM
4

She's had her own political career for her entire life. https://m.imgur.com/bOHR3aI
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:25 AM
2

Thanks bot.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:03 AM
3

Oh shit. You post on Reddit? Tickle me pink. Love your videos. Keep up the good work!
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:55 AM
1

ayy lmao
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:51 AM
3

Just in the USA?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:44 AM
2

http://i.imgur.com/j2v1Uflh.jpg
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:42 AM
1

👌
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:40 AM
1

This is all I've seen. That site is giving my phone cancer, so if it's the same one in the article, I apologize in advance. https://youtu.be/9yC7-JsR2Fk
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:35 AM
37

Fuck, that's Toronto. Goddammit, Canada. Why are you doing this? Toronto has been a festering cesspool of the SJW cancer since I can remember.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:28 AM
2

https://i.redd.it/mqcjf62v5tjy.png
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:53 AM
1

You should call in sick lolol
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:42 AM
1

There are numerous secular groups and organisations that are pro-life. Granted, I'm not one of them, but you have to be pretty thickheaded to think they don't exist. A famous example would be the late Christopher Hitches, and he's was as secular as they came. The funny thing, though, is a lot of these people may object to it on moral grounds but still recognise that the the legal primacy of privacy is more important in terms of of how the government should get involved.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:04 AM
7

Not everyone in the usa lives in a state where those rights would be protected lol just because one state has em doesnt mean everyone has the right Not everyone in the USA wants those rights protected. Why is that so hard to understand? People vote for who they want to represent them. And those people govern. If you want unfettered access to abortion, then vote for it. If you don't get your way and are out voted, and it's that important to you, move. If we end up with some states that don't allo…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 04:08 AM
-1

Have you met New York?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:34 AM
11

The joke is that a lot of people who protested are calling Trump literally Hitler, or fascist, and that the women who marched are brave to stand up to him. So the joke is pointing out the ridiculously of the hyperbole by showing a real example of people standing up to literal Nazis. It just happens that the people who did so were overwhelmingly men.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:15 AM
5

Abortion rights. The Republican party platform for decades has included trying to overturn Roe v. Wade. If we want to fight for the right to financial abortions, then we should also be willing to protect women's ability to get abortions. Which would only push the issue of abortion to the state-level. No one's rights are being taken away. And it should be said that more women than not are "pro-life", so it's not like these women speak for everyone.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:11 AM
2

Spicy 🌶
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:59 PM
1

We Hunted The Mamoth. Ah, I am (unfortunately) familiar with that site.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 10:14 PM
1

Who is he? I'm not familiar with the name.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:32 PM
10

I posted an article review of his on TIL years ago. It reached 5000+ upvotes. And then it was removed because the title was "misleading". The reason given was because I failed to mention that women are hurt more during domestic violence—a point that was mentioned in the article but was not even close to the main focus. That was my introduction to Reddit and it's style of censorship.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 11:24 AM
10

Altogether, the men’s-rights movement represents a streak of misogyny that Trump’s candidacy helped bring to the forefront. But instead of falling in line behind Trump, men’s-rights activists have largely steered clear of the election. Indeed, their movement seems to be losing momentum AND THEY WONDER WHY NO ONE TRUSTS THE MEDIA
/r/MensRights16/12/16 11:19 AM
3

That's the same argument pro-life people make: use birth control (which includes abstinence) or face the consequences. Except it's not because in one situation it's asking a party to lose autonomy over their own body. How so? How does allowing men to have the ability to opt out of parenthood force women to do anything? It in no way implies women would be forced to carry to term. It might make them re-think having the baby due to monetary concerns (having to be a single-parent), but they are stil…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:25 AM
3

Eh if the man has control at conception (i.e. it's not rape) then I don't see a problem. Wear a condom or don't have sex. That's the same argument pro-life people make: use birth control (which includes abstinence) or face the consequences. It ignores that unintentional pregnancies happen. It also ignore that pregnancy isn't the only reason to have to sex. Sex serves many functions for pair-bonding mammals. After that it's the woman's body and her choice until birth. We shouldn't be able to coer…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 05:35 AM
3

How is one at odds with the other? Each person controlling their own body does not conflict with the others rights. Custody is a different issue of course. Custody is an extension of reproduction rights, or at the very least they overlap. A woman wants to keep the baby, man does not. The woman has the right to her body, and unilaterally decides the fate of half her DNA. If the man wants to keep the baby and she does not, then the woman has the exclusive rights to her reproduction. The man is not…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 04:48 AM
2

Men's rights and women's rights are not at odds [...] They can be (re: reproductive rights).
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:29 AM
2

Alt-right is the new blanket term to refer to anyone you don't like (if you're on this left), just like GamerGater was for awhile.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:09 AM
1

Good thing the movie is out.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:26 AM
1

My title literally has "further" in it.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:26 AM
2

Ha! That's a good analogy.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:40 PM
3

Yeah? That would be awesome.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:23 AM
3

That's not how that works. Foetuses get erections in the womb.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 09:08 PM
4

At 11, has the kid even hit puberty yet?
/r/MensRights17/09/16 06:50 PM
1

This is what happens when an entire political party is backed by man-shaming and the regressive left's in-group/out-group identity politics. We can't even talk about the health of a presidential candidate because she's a woman. Fuck the media.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 05:54 PM
7

vote independent
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:48 PM
2

Why should men have to stop first? Men are not moaning about being objectified, women are. Why should men change first when female or male objectification doesn't concern us? Ever stop to think that this bulge nonsense is because of gay men? For all we know women aren't the target audience for shit articles like this.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:29 PM
5

Anyone stop to think that all this Olympic bulge nonsense is being perpetuated by gay men? I keep seeing people call women for this shit, but that might be like giving women a hard time over Playgirl: women aren't the target audience. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:29 PM
12

Double standards. Assuming they have standards to begin with.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 05:55 PM
7

Great article. I'm happy that Time is doing this. This is a source that I can actually forward to my mother or wife with out it being ignored completely due to source. *did this It's an old article.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:16 PM
3

This guy is a complete ass hat, as some in the atheist community might attest to. Some would say he's being targeted by a "broken epistemology" that he himself helped sustain. Either way, take it as you will. Feel sorry for him or not; laugh at the irony; just be aware that this Atheism+, SJW plague takes no prisoners.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:39 AM
10

I don't think you understand what is happening here. Let the adults talk and go back to the kiddie table.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:36 AM
11

The child didn't die. She plead guilty to aggravated assault. Read the damn article, man.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 07:11 PM
2

Shit, I literally posted something right after you. Your social media must be beaming with intellectually stimulating (/s) debates too. The conversation is everywhere right now on social media, and what it often comes down to is: 1) what if pervy men take advantage of Trans-positive laws; or 2) women would feel uncomfortable around masculine individuals. Has anyone addressed this in any public form? Any papers or op-eds? Few people seem to have mentioned it.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:22 AM
2

It had legs over at /r/rage
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:25 AM
0

Because that's how the law works in Canada.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 03:13 PM
4

You know what's fucked up though? He might have kept them because he knew he was sexually assaulting these women. The kicker is that, per the evidence from this case, the women might have been okay with being sexually assaulted. (One of them testified that she feared for her life but went back to him days later to give him a hand job.) So what the fuck do we do when some women are okay with being sexually assaulted? Last I checked, a good 20-30% of women have had sexual fantasies involving rape.…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:27 AM
1

Cool, thanks.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:52 AM
1

So this is one hot mess? A comment below is showing that some 70% of sexual assault victims say they didn't report it because it was "minor". But the article you link seems to be operating under the assumption that people don't report it because there is some stigma against it. Where is that assumption coming from? How do we eliminate the possibility that only 8% of the 460,000 were serious enough to be reported. How many of that 8% resulted in some kind of conviction? Am I reading this right: 4…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:43 AM
1

Maybe it's because I'm on mobile, but some of the squares are just letters (E or Fs). What's that mean? Some look like 22E
/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:22 AM
9

A victory for Canada, and thus the world.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:21 PM
1

edit 2: did not realize I was posting in a men's rights group Welcome to the dark side.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:14 PM
3

Has this been verified? Seems too crazy to be true.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:24 AM
5

Frankly he is looking everywhere he can for any kind of gap. Comment I saw on YouTube: This video is fascinating; it's a textbook example of the way SJWs react when challenged on their cherry-picked data - double down and distort. He made this video as a response people calling him out for blithely stating that there's a 23% gender pay gap in the US, which he immediately admits is a fairly meaningless statistic and is almost entirely attributable to personal choices leading to differences in hou…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 07:29 AM
2

Oh, my bad. Other link going around didn't say. Didnt notice it was different. That said, that punishment seems reasonable.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:46 AM
4

What's the punishment? Jail? Fine?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:55 AM
-5

This is the "journalist" who sold all that merchandise about enjoying men's tears, right? Why is she still getting work? She got your attention, didn't she? That's 75% of her job.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:29 PM
5

You radical thinker, you.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 12:21 AM
3

We believe that men’s issues cannot be approached in the same way as unfairness and discrimination towards women, because women are structurally unequal to men The myth that launched a thousand ships.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:18 PM
4

Yes. Have a cookie.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 06:26 AM
3

Tried posting this to nottheonion but it kept getting removed. Don't get why; it's perfect!
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:40 AM
14

dead people feel nothing ¯\_(シ)_/¯
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:44 PM
93

War is a male invention ¯\_(シ)_/¯
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:57 PM
7

...lol
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:02 PM
35

And then we get some weird cultural divide with educated women on one end and autodidact men on the other, with the former having all the government jobs and the latter living underground.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:09 AM
8

I am also not familiar with any scholarships that are for men only.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:07 AM
2

The kicker is that the films are mostly in-depth looks at character arcs of men who aspire to achieve greater ends than all the materialistic, hedonistic vices a career in stripping grants. And as such, a lot of women felt like the movie was a bait and switch.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 04:00 AM
6

I have little idea who this guy is but he comes off very weaselly. Lots of talking in circles without committing to anything concrete. That's why I like Karen Straughan; you might not always agree with what she says but at least she's clear and concise, even when she kicks the snark into overdrive.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:51 AM
0

[...] but if HE HIMSELF identified as male He did. What part of that don't you understand? I'm sure I could convince a young-enough-child that they are a dog. If they do not reject the label of "dog", does that make their species complicated? Or does it mean they are a fucking child that doesn't understand the importance of making the distinction? That's where the tension came from: He never felt comfortable being a girl, despite everyone saying he was his entire life. It also didn't help that h…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:06 AM
0

And how is that contradicts my post? I think David's gender identity was not "male" He was born male and testosterone primed his brain to be male. Biologically speaking, he was chromosomally, hormonally, and anatomically male [before getting his penis mutilated]. read·ing com·pre·hen·sion
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:07 AM
0

You asked when is adapting not a good thing. Adapting is good but it implies there's something to adapt to. In the broader context it's hardships men face. Those hardships are not good and are constant hurdles that need to be overcome. So when is adapting not good? When the hardship never ends (like a quadriplegic with cancer); when you habituate to a constantly shitty situation (i.e., learned helplessness); when you become disconnected from life; when apathy is considered a worthwhile personali…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 10:03 PM
-2

Allow me to be hyperbolic for a moment: a quadriplegic with an intracranial tumor may, by all accounts, live a normal life. It's not easy but they are constantly adapting, adjusting, and overcoming their adversity. Is that a good thing? (As a matter of perspective, it's an admirable and useful personality trait but it's hard to describe cancer or being quadriplegic a "good thing". To be resilient by definition means overcoming hardship. I doubt you would wish hardship on anyone, even if it meant…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:11 PM
4

If the general consensus here is that a man becoming a woman would adjust better than a woman becoming a man, then yeah, I'd agree. A man's greatest weapon is being able to not give a shit—to face adversity with extraordinary levels of apathy. So while we may say that men would fare better when playing the gender-swap-game, we need to ask ourselves if that's a good thing. Norah Vincent's experiences, after all, seemed to revolve around problems with a general emotional disconnect.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:42 PM
2

Well, off the top of my head, the constant posturing and manipulation. I watch my girlfriend come home from work and it's just constant drama. People talking shit behind your back. Lots of betrayal and mind games. Granted, maybe the women she works with are not representative and, granted, I would probably react differently to the drama by virtue of being a guy, but I can imagine it gets exhausting.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:24 PM
42

This just proves that the normal expectations men face on a daily basis would be hell on earth to women. I'd imagine a man living as a woman for 18 months would feel the same. Can we all just start agreeing that it can, and usually does, suck being anyone? Like, seriously. Life sucks for pretty much everyone. Everyone has problems to vary degrees. Men with problems are just used to those kinds of problems, and vice versa for women. A man becoming a woman or woman becoming a man is going to find …
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:02 PM
30

It's only "complicated" because they cut his fucking dick off. He was born male and testosterone primed his brain to be male. Biologically speaking, he was chromosomally, hormonally, and anatomically male. John Money, and those with the Blank Slate theory of human behaviour, contributed to his chronic depression. They made it complicated.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:53 PM
111

She has an excess amount of testosterone, so obviously this is still a problem of toxic masculinity :)
/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:29 PM
5

Eh, not quite
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:31 PM
9

Reddit has seen its share of mega threads nuked to high heaven as of late for questionable rule violations. Male victim and deplorable police behaviour seem like reasons enough, but my main concern was that one of the top comments is pretty much asking for a mob justice on one of the cops (they have his Facebook).
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:09 PM
2

Something tells me the post on /r/news might "disappear", even if it is growing momentum.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:32 PM
193

TIL that I am, along with 15 or so other people, currently harassing the shit out of our doctors.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:44 PM
2

I'm well aware of the myriad definitions of "feminist" and the varying degrees sub-groups within the feminist movements over the last few decades have adhered to the different ideological foundations of their respective feminist theories. If by "women's rights activist =/= feminist" you mean that you can advocate for women's rights without The Patriarchy (or any other element of feminist theory) being a significant part of your worldview, then yes. I would wholeheartedly agree. If you meant that…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 09:14 AM
6

[...] here aren't many things that women can complain about [...] there are many other women's rights issues outside of the U.S. that are in dire need of being legally addressed Ah, a rare breed indeed: the "reasonable" feminist. Welcome. Stay awhile.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:15 AM
7

Well, seeing that GamerGate is a consumer revolt that takes issue with corrupt journalism, over-politicization of the news, and lack of disclosure policies, GamerGate is doing well in that numerous publications have created or updated ethics policies (e.g., The Escapist, IGN, Kotaku and their stance on Patreon donations). They've also mangaged to uncover numerous instances of conflict of intrests (the most recent example). GamerGate has also contributed $1000s to a variety of charities. They're …
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:09 AM
0

Yeah, I just finished reading through that part of the comments. Interesting idea to say the least. Makes sense for long-term relationships but something tells me bastard children and one night stands result in ugly child support feuds. The people reasonable to use such a legal device aren't the problematic demographic.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:28 AM
1

Laws? Arguably not. Scholarships? Sometimes they are funded privately, and private donors should allowed to do what they want with their money. Publicly funded? Sure, as long as you have men-only scholarships too. Equality isn't that hard to grasp.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:57 AM
3

Can we see the results, when you have them? The thesis/project/report that is. The author should be ethically required to, if the ethics board at the university is worth it's weight in gold. You should, at any time, be able to withdraw your data after signing an informed consent sheet.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:53 AM
-1

The idea behind that though, and why family court exists in the first place, is that the child's well-being is paramount. That's why it's called child support. Don't get me wrong: the system is fucked and the biases against men are well researched. But the system exists for a reason, namely enforcing a legal and moral obligation toward an otherwise helpless human being that exists by virtue of two other people's decisions (or, in the case of birth control, lack thereof). Giving all parents the a…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:49 AM
2

The author can't seem to go there. Instead he enters into the insanity of the bigot's position and takes it seriously. It's called a rational discussion. The hallmark of intellectual maturity is the ability to reason through positions you don't hold. Anyways, that's not why I'm responding. The author actually writes a lot about gender inequality and how men often get the shit end of the stick. His area of expertise is Evolutionary Psychology. Gender ideologues don't like EP. He deals with their …
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:41 AM
2

Do you have a source for this? Is the drugged drink the new razorblade in the Halloween candy?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:28 AM
4

Ah, yes. Thanks. I read your post, and the word "services", and immediately thought of like medical or dental care or something of that sort. It suffices to say that I was a bit confused.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:10 AM
18

selective services Non-American here. What is this all about? What kind of services are these and why are men "forced" to apply for them? Do women not have to sign up for these? Edit: Saw the link. Read the link. Understand now. Many thanks.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:42 AM
2

Same story different sites? My apologies.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 11:28 PM
3

Was on my phone when I originally posted it. It's marked now.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:28 PM
15

Victory is a victory.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter