TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Ninja_Wizard_ Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by _Ninja_Wizard_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Can you explain the disparity in medical outcomes between men and women?
/r/MensRights24/10/21 05:01 PM
1

That's what the law says
/r/MensRights14/04/17 08:16 PM
2

There's a very large amount of crossover of the bell curves for men and women
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/17 11:21 PM
3

My ex believes in unicorns.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:44 PM
2

Don't you love workplace politics?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:59 PM
7

Exactly. Women are attracted to the humanities, or nursing/pediatrics, which, incidentally, pays less.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 06:39 PM
0

Yes, I know. I'm talking relative terms. Even people in Bangladesh are having 2 children per family because of access to contraceptives and better education. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html The only place in the world where the average is 3 or higher is Africa. Basically everywhere else is just sustaining the population.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 11:47 PM
1

And go fuck yourself, you hypocrite. You went through my posting history.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:13 PM
0

I'm not the one who created an alternate account to harass some anonymous person online because you get satisfaction from that. I had a few minutes of free time and decided to see what you were really like.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:11 PM
0

You created an alternate account to try to harass me. Fuck you. Looking through your posting history a few minutes ago made me feel really bad for you. You're just a tool. Go home to your (totally real) girlfriend and reflect on your life decisions. If you can spend an hour and a half fucking with a random person on the internet, you can watch that fucking youtube video. Your time is obviously not that valuable.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:10 PM
0

Mr. projection, here
/r/MensRights27/12/16 09:48 PM
1

People have tried using telomerases to extend lifespans of mice. They've tried using it in cancer treatments in vitro. I knew you were trolling me, but I answered your question honestly about telomerases, but I accidentally put your stupid nonsense there.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 08:26 PM
2

No, compete methods are what matter. If you spent half as much time looking at the sources I posted as you do being an asshole, maybe you'd learn something, Mr. Pretend ecologist.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 08:24 PM
0

Also, "peer review" doesn't mean shit to me. Shitty papers get published every day. I only care about papers that have robust and complete methods. I'll read that link you sent me later and tell you what I think about the study.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 08:10 PM
1

I was referring to telomerases. I had a brain fart. I knew you were trying to troll me. I had my mind in other places. I tell you what. you got me. Believe whatever you want about me. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 07:58 PM
2

...and you have qualifications to refute my opinion?
/r/MensRights27/12/16 07:13 PM
1

I work in epigenetics. Here's your sources, you lazy derp On self-replicating telomerestelomerases, I think it's vastly overlooking the epigentiec changes that occur in cancer cell formation, mainly histone acetylation on the 27th lysine on the H3 subunit. That's why we use HDAC's for cancer treatments. 5hmC is also very highly upregulated in cancer. Telomerases are also not a solution to point mutations in tumor suppressor genes. Telomerases are a meme.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 07:12 PM
-2

You dismissed the video without watching it. I highly recommend it. It has the best figures I've ever seen. This man is a very reputable statistician. I'm also a biologist. I've seen some of the literature on population growth, and most papers link to the mouse study. You really think mice emulate human behavior 1:1? You think mice have education systems, or contraceptives? Can they build infrastructure? Birth rates are damn near 2.2, globally, which is the replacement number for humans. Our pop…
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:18 PM
-1

No there isn't. Do you have any evidence? Or are you just saying that because of your personal anecdotal experience?
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:43 PM
6

She was hoping for a girl so that she could militantly raise it to fight the """patriarchy""".
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:20 PM
-1

Not over populated, just better Healthcare, nutrition, and education.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:18 PM
0

I'm going to respectfully disagree with you. Humans have expanded all over the world. I'm also not a subscriber to the overpopulation myth. Birth rates around the world (only exception is Africa) averages about 2.5 children per woman. When Healthcare, agriculture, and education advances, people have less children. Once (if) we expand to other planets, population will rise exponentially again until it reaches another plateau.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:17 PM
2

Fuck these people. If I could punch then in the face once without repercussions, I'd punch them 20 times in the nose.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:08 PM
10

Oh shut up. Who cares what you have to say? /s
/r/MensRights23/12/16 03:36 PM
1

Yea, that only works if you are Pied Piper.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 04:55 PM
12

Doesn't matter what you think. People get married for stupid, selfish reasons all the time. There's a wedding happening right now.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 05:02 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights09/12/16 07:11 PM
2

I still think she's an idiot. She completely ignored that guy's analysis BEFORE she spewed out her biased shit. Even after he explained it again, she still didn't get it. How is she a "professional" economist?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 05:24 PM
3

Yes, she was acting professionally, but you could see the obvious facial expressions that showed her true feelings about the subject. She looked pretty damn smug to me.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 05:10 PM
3

because that number was taken at face value, like how that woman in the video took the numbers at face value and didn't analyze them at all.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:58 AM
3

lol, like logic works on them. They just shout "I HAVE A GENDER STUDIES DEGREE, I KNOW MORE THAN YOU~~~"
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:56 AM
3

literally made me lol
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:54 AM
3

Hey, man. Put ONE drug in your body and things can change rapidly. i.e. heroin
/r/TheRedPill30/10/16 02:47 AM
4

I guess it's because it's too risky to hire a legitimate hitman
/r/MensRights30/10/16 01:16 AM
10

I guess he's not wrong
/r/MensRights29/10/16 08:47 PM
8

BTC
/r/MensRights29/10/16 08:46 PM
7

That would be great
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:48 PM
48

A legal battle that no one should have to fight.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 01:40 PM
70

And they still didn't get it. In fact, they probably are going to go back to their businesses and lose more money over their delusions.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 06:06 AM
18

they know a hell of a lot more than these fuckers about women in construction. Then why are they losing money? Why are they being labeled as sexists by the investors? The female investor didn't even want anything to do with them. You gotta be kidding me. They obviously are crusaders for feminism (which isn't necessarily a bad thing if you're trying to dissipate workplace discrimination between sexes, but they are obviously delusional to think that women want to work in construction).
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 06:05 AM
-1

Hey, she was mostly right. That doesn't make her absolutely wrong. Give her some credit for trying, man. You should read Isaac Asimov's Relativity of Wrong. It's actually a really good read. He's the same guy who wrote iRobot and the short story "The Last Question".
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:30 PM
2

Too bad there's a paywall... I'd like to read the whole paper
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:37 PM
2

The Harvard study clearly states that they examined 11,370 respondents from 18,761 heterosexual relationships.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:31 PM
3

In the methods section of the paper, it states that they examined 11,370 respondents of 18,761 heterosexual relationships. You don't even needed to pay to read that. They include it in the abstract. No need to get aggressive towards me. I understand that homosexual relationships have their problems as well, but that's not what this paper was specifically analyzing. I'd like to add that OP is only slightly wrong. She mentions that 40-70% of all domestic violence cases are women on men, where the …
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:21 PM
1

Since I'm on mobile and its like almost 3 o'clock in the morning, I'm not going to directly link to the study, but I'd be willing to bet that they explained what their criteria for violence is in the paper. Despite this, I don't think we should downplay any form of violence. So what if somebody hit somebody and didn't do any damage? It was still an act of violence and an outburst of some form of anger. It's absolutely uncivilized and uncalled for. If you're not mature enough to handle problems i…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:48 AM
1

Don't be so hard on yourself. Everyone reads things incorrectly from time to time. At least you have the humility to accept your mistake.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:51 AM
0

Right, but that's not what this comic is trying to show.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:48 AM
1

This is why I call myself a humanitarian, not a feminist. Feminism implies that women are the victims and that men are always the perpetrators. Humanitarians see the issues of both genders and don't discriminate based on anything. But if you dare say anything against the feminist narrative and say that you're a humanitarian instead of a feminist, you're just a f****** misogynist, right?
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:44 AM
3

And the white knights are so delusional that they think its going to get them laid or something for allowing some women to behave like this. They only help validate those women's actions.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:41 AM
2

I got banned on that sub just for participating in this one.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:38 AM
6

Hey man, statistics is hard. I'm not a statistician myself, but I do work with a lot of numbers everyday. Just trying to clear things up for everyone.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:33 AM
27

Edit: the Harvard study clearly states that they only analyzed heterosexual relationships. You're trying to twist the statistics that are clearly laid out in front of you. Neither OP nor the study stated that roughly 40 to 70% of all relationships having woman on man violence. The study says that about a quarter of relationships have violence. Of those relationships that have violence, about half of the people reciprocate with violence (~12.5% of all relationships). Of those relationships that d…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:23 AM
2

I think the law should be different for married couples, but not couples who are just dating. They signed a contract to be with each other, so they should be held to different standards. At least in my opinion. Couples who are just dating should be held to the same standard as strangers on the street.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:12 PM
3

Ugh. How many times do I have to explain to you degenerates that I wear a trilby?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:10 PM
32

I'll protect you with my blade, m'lady
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:31 PM
1

Try harder
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:40 PM
3

If anyone is doing any hitting in a relationship, then they're obviously not dealing with their problems in a healthy way and they need to separate and the attacker needs to be reprimanded for their actions. It doesn't matter if anybody got hurt or not, it was the intention to hurt with physical violence that deserves punishment.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:37 PM
987

Fucking white knights
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:35 PM
2

Although I agree that they probably deserve it, I would highly advise against doing something like that. Mostly for two reasons: 1) I don't believe that violence would solve any issue like this, and 2) Our biased Judicial System would surely land the man in jail and the woman would get away without consequence, unfortunately. Edit: clarification
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:33 PM
16

Sorry to hear that. I know somebody who's ex used to beat him regularly. He's in a pretty healthy relationship now. The abuser works at Hooters and posts on Facebook about how awesome she is all of the time. It makes me livid. I'd have to disagree with your stats statement. Iirc, women are more likely to instigate violence against men than men are against women.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:31 PM
2

That's basically what I said except strung out into three paragraphs
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:08 PM
6

Don't try to make sense of our fucked up laws
/r/MensRights16/09/16 01:58 PM
4

They rarely do.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/16 02:23 PM
1

What's even more fucked up is that those two are hardly comparable. You can't choose to be short, but you CAN choose to be a lazy fat fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/16 04:48 PM
2

In evolutionary biology, competing against one another means they're trying to bring their sexual market value up so that they'll be more desirable to mates.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:17 PM
1

The only reason that the word slut has a bad connotation is because of evolutionary biology. In the context of our complicated society today it shouldn't mean anything. However old people are always going to hold onto their belief systems and pass them on to the younger Generations. Funny thing is that women slut shame at a significantly higher rate than men do.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 04:49 PM
1

Exactly. She's not going to get anything out of being served "justice"
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter