TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Panz Archive

View 4 posts and 102 comments by _Panz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

Bitch would get her ass kicked by any lazy, couch-dwelling, cheetos-fingers-stained dude. You all know it's true. She beat up her "lover" because she knew there were male police officers on her side. What a piece of shit. Despicable.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:29 AM
-1

Fuck off troll.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:24 AM
3

Ouch. So she's a bigger bitch than most...
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:23 AM
1

I wish I could down-vote you twice. Hating on men who were cut and who had no choice in the matter is fucking sick. And you are sick.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:02 AM
3

Butters: "Sor-rry"? Canadian girl: It's Canadians' way of expressing remorse. Butters: Oh, neato!
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:02 AM
1

Milo supports Donald Trump. The easiest way of discrediting Men's Rights globally would be to invite on Milo.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:53 AM
3

It's actually pronounced "fwend", guy.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:48 PM
4

One can be a left-libertarian, ie agree with bottom-up political and economic egalitarianism but be opposed to restrictions on free speech, assembly etc. See eg Noam Chomsky or Oscar Wilde.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:46 PM
10

Thanks, look forward to it.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:36 PM
6

Leftists are not now nor have they ever been open-minded. Historically, one of the first things Leftists do when they take power is kill or imprison homosexuals, intellectuals, artists and anyone else who they perceive as a threat to unquestioning obedience. That must be why the same groups of people, and indeed anyone who expressed a mild dislike of capitalism, were slaughtered by the millions in Latin American during the Cold War by US-backed capitalist regimes. The "left" cannot be reduced to…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:33 PM
1

I agree. This article is disgusting. Could you imagine a man writing an article against FGM by saying we should end the practice because non-mutilated women are "better in bed" for their male partners? Yet another example of female narcissism and callousness toward men and boys.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:26 PM
2

Indeed.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:19 PM
2

Well, they're not wrong...
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:02 PM
23

Bravo, Karen. BTW, were your recent lectures recorded, and will they be available online in the near future? Thanks.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:07 PM
2

husband gap LMAO. Who cares whether men are going to college, the important thing is that women can find husbands with the same perceived social status! And as for those "blue collar" workers -- ew, they're so icky! Allowing society to function and everything...why can't I land a nice hedge fund manager who robs people for a living? The sense of entitlement and indeed objectification here is just off the charts (more proof that feminist complaints about men are largely projection). They view men…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:58 PM
5

It usually takes time for people to deprogram themselves from cults. Feminists are no different. Feminism is part of their identity, and all of us are reluctant to abandon our beloved ideologies. Typically when people receive information that conflicts with their worldview they rationalize it away or burry it in their subconscious. However, with enough patience and effort I do believe that people can be deprogrammed. Many of us here, including myself, used to call ourselves feminists when we did…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:27 AM
1

Anyone know if/when the video of this lecture and the other at SFU will be available? Also, were there any protests at SFU? I remember another poster predicting there wouldn't be any protests because feminists are too cowardly to take on Karen...
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:22 AM
9

It was inevitable. MRA's warned the filmmaker. She didn't care.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:10 AM
-2

Um, no. TRP sub has as much in common with men's rights as Cosmo magazine does with feminists. Fuck off troll.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:09 AM
1

Don't think they won't do exactly that. Have you compared traditional Sherlock Holmes to Holmes starring Robert Downey Jr? Never mind the logic...
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:32 PM
1

Great post. BTW are you Tom Golden? Enjoy your work. I've always thought the slogan "men are good" is quite brilliant, undoubtedly true for 99% of men, yet currently subversive.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:08 PM
7

Dramatic music plus Damsel in Distress trope? Seems to work pretty well for Anita Sarkeesian. Coming to a theatre near you... GAMERGATE Starring Scarlett Johansson as Zoe Quinn. Paul Giamatti as Sargon of Akkad Justin Bieber as Milo Yiannopoulos Daniel Day Lewis as Tl;Dr. and Sarah Jessica Parker as Anita Sarkeesian.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:29 PM
1

Feminism opposes Men's Rights. They say so themselves. In fact "MRA" is a term of derision amongst feminists. Feminists are disgusted and appalled by the idea that men and boys should have human rights.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:17 PM
6

Interesting how a womyn who is so oppressed can rally the entire media on her behalf. Whoever said "chivalry is dead" was full of shit.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:16 PM
2

As a non-American, I can tell you with a great deal of certainty that the Democratic Party is not "left-wing." Their policies would be classified as far-right in most Western nations. 90% of them support corporatism and war. The identity politic bullshit is designed to distract everyone from that fact. There is virtually no difference between the two parties on matters of true import. Historically the Democrats attacked actual leftists just as much as Republicans. The modern American "left" -- w…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:48 PM
4

The media is truly awful. At least in the Soviet Union people knew they were being fed bullshit. Most of us continue to have a child-like faith in the bobblehead "news" reporters on TV.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:36 PM
1

Excellent ;) Let's not become what we hate...
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:23 PM
8

Here's an amazing, little known fact: the feminist organization NOW opposed a physician's campaign designed to educate women about the relationship between age and fertility. To me, this represents one of the most interesting and disturbing episodes in the history of feminism. Many studies show that women are not only woefully ignorant when it comes to fertility, conception and the efficacy of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) – but they overestimate their knowledge about the subject. For…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:19 PM
6

I think there's a weird sort of inferiority/superiority complex going on at the same time. Penis envy combined with a desire to castrate men, to use a Freudian analogy.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:52 PM
24

Feminists: biting the hand that feeds them for over 150 years...
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:49 PM
31

There are a lot of prominent feminists and originators of the movement that openly hate men, and many current and recent actions, articles, books and so forth that prove hate towards men (who, these days, are a minority at universities). Hear hear. Feminists make ME feel "unsafe." I mean Jesus they're trying to eliminate due process rights for men! Does that mean I can ban all feminist groups from campuses? (that's a good question actually: would I ban feminists from campus if I had the power? t…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:46 PM
1

Exactly this, in countries like mine (Spain), same offense is a completely different legal figure depending on the genre of the perpetrator and victim. That's exactly what I'm talking about. It's even worse in many non-Anglo countries, as Spain demonstrates.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:34 PM
2

She rightly calls one-sided films 'propaganda', and she's not interested. I'm not sure what this has to do with the subject at hand. Falsely claiming that conscription is the only strictly legal form of discrimination that men face, and that all of our problems result from "cultural bias" in application of otherwise neutral laws, is itself propaganda. I don't expect a one-sided presentation in favour of MRA's; in fact, I think Futrelle was quite shrewd in pre-emptively attacking her on this scor…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:24 PM
1

Reddit generally caters to insecure low status outcasts So people like yourself...or what? You seem pretty insecure. Sorry but you reek of insecurity.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:03 PM
3

Women understand equality full well. But they don't understand honor. There. I said it.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:02 PM
0

Both sides acted like little children, and that's about that.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:13 PM
14

America is extremely tough on criminals -- male criminals, that is. When it comes to women, America may well be the most pussy-whipped nation in the world. Sweden at least demands relative parity -- short terms for both sexes. America demands extremely tough sentences for men and extremely tiny sentences for womynz. If I'm not mistaken this is more or less true throughout the entire Anglosphere, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:04 AM
7

I remember when people used to talk about the gargantuan "wage gaps" between the super-rich and the super-poor. Now we have spoiled entitled divas whining that they only make $10 million dollars per film. At least most rich men have the sense to STFU and count their blessings lest the peasants get restless and go looking for their pitchforks. Rich feminist women simply can't help themselves from nagging and complaining no matter how good they have it.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:57 AM
19

The Princess and the Pea.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:57 AM
49

Only 11 percent of the construction industry is female and just one percent work on building sites. Why? Maybe it's got something to do with the fact that there aren't any other women working on building sites. Obviously women are going to be put off joining sectors they've historically been excluded from at every single level. Why would any girl want to be a scaffolder when she's never seen a woman doing it? LMAO. That's right: it's not because those jobs are FUCKING DANGEROUS, it's because cup…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:52 AM
3

Okay fair enough.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:43 AM
15

Holy shit. It's amazing, looking back when I was a kid, how I just assumed the guy was guilty due to the media reportage. I probably chuckled at jokes about the incident told by hack comedians like Jay Leno. In fact I remember watching a romcom starring Hugh Grant where the leader of a woman's group has on a shirt reading "Lorena Bobbit for President" (kinda funny in the context of the film -- but can you imagine a role reversal? Me neither). Even then I wouldn't have said "he deserved it" -- I'…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:27 AM
-4

You're being downvoted but you are correct. Unfortunately there are many people in the MRM who absolutely hate Muslims -- all 1.5 billion of them. The reluctance on the part of feminists do demonize Muslims while there is a virtual genocide underway (at least 4 million Muslims have been killed due to Western and Israeli imperial interventions since 1980) is one of their few saving graces. It's mostly due to their accidental affiliation with the left, however. Plenty of conservative women who mor…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:28 AM
3

FGM is mostly enforced by other women; it's not an issue of men "taking revenge" as you implied. Moreover, unlike MGM, FGM is illegal in the vast majority of countries in which it is still practiced. There are also numerous different forms of FGM -- some are basically ceremonial and amount to a pin prick. Female adulterers are indeed stoned to death in a tiny number of remote third world hellholes. Which we can all agree is utterly appalling and barbaric. But those rules are also enforced by wom…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:13 AM
-15

The people in the crowd were acting like juvenile idiots, I agree. But I see no reason shy he shouldn't have just stepped back a few feet. You don't need to be up in someone's face to take a picture.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:04 AM
-6

Nope, not in those places either.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:56 AM
0

Um, no, they wouldn't. Saudi Arabians are not a separate species.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:18 AM
13

Is the footage online? BTW, was any proof ever presented that he was abusing her?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:01 AM
56

"The more empathetic sex."
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:59 AM
-13

Standing one inch from a person's face and taking photos of them is a dickish move. He was being just as provocative as the crowd. And fuck you too.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:05 AM
-15

I'm not saying they had the right to eject him, just saying that he was being a dick. Why not just stand back a few feet instead of provoking the crowd?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:00 AM
2

The fact that Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are funding feminist campaigns tells us all we need to know about the "leftist" pretensions of feminists. Rich men are indeed privileged -- due to their class -- but they are happy to pretend as though it's due to their whiteness or maleness and throw the working class under the bus. Feminism should be reviled on the left. Instead, it is a sacred cow because...womynz.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:58 AM
-21

Can someone explain what the fuck is going on here? To be honest it seemed like the Asian dude was being a bit of a dick. They were apparently asking him to move back with the rest of the media but he insisted on staying up in their grills and taking close up pictures. Pretty gutsy considering the mob mentality of the protesters (what are they protesting?) but seems like he was provoking them as well.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:37 AM
3

All of them.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:13 PM
12

The comments are even more appalling. Women celebrating the fact that boys are falling behind, telling boys to suck it up and try harder because females were supposedly hard done by in the past. These are fucking ADULTS, many of whom claim to have sons themselves. One woman remarked that she is raising three sons to be feminists and that they are doing better than most males in being properly emotional -- though they still have a long way to go, of course. The important thing is that they place …
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:06 PM
5

The left used to about helping the working man. Now it is about blaming the working man. Shame on Corbyn.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:11 PM
3

the same dopamine levels are reached, man or woman. I'm not talking about "dopamine levels." I'm talking about probability for eg children becoming juvenile delinquents. Sorry to say, but while mothers are important, especially in the first few years, fathers are required in the long run.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:10 PM
34

Let's us women who have tens of millions of dollars exploit a girl who grew up in a mud hut. Bravo, feminists. How did her brothers fair?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:39 PM
2

They call Elliot Rogers an MRA' All from a blog by David Futrelle, a self-loathing pedophile weirdo. Unbelievable. Where are the "radical MRAs" who advocate for "all women must be in the kitchen making sammiches" ? They don't fucking exist. My mom made and makes the best sandwiches ever. Especially tuna. I'm convinced that females really are better at multi-tasking. Thing is: since when did doing something nice for a man who works all day become an insult? What a horrible society we are creating…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:25 PM
-3

Good for you. Unless a boy is abused by his mother (even then) we all love our mothers more than life itself. There's a reason that men take particular offence at silly "your mamma so fat" jokes. The terrific film "Menace 2 society" dramatized this. "What you say about my momma?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nz2p5nk-X-E Yes, we men and boys all love our momma's. And we all would die for our momma's unless they abused us or unless we ended up sociopaths. I'm willing to concede that at one poin…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:44 AM
2

Oh look, another concern troll. Look again, it's perfectly okay to point out double standards. Obviously most men don't give a shit about male models being "objectified" or the wage gap in the porn industry; the point of such posts is not to cry "woe is me" but to reveal the many hypocrisies of feminism. That's it. Most of the posts (not all) that are highly upvoted deal with significant issues affecting men and boys. No need to have a hissy fit over the occasional "role reversal" post.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:20 AM
3

I'm Canadian. We arguably have an even worse deal under the TPP than the US. I'm doing my best to raise awareness about the issue. But I'm inclined to agree that it may be up to Americans to stop it. When the US says "jump" most countries (or rather the leadership of most countries) say "how high?" Here's hoping we can create an international juggernaut and defeat this appalling legislation. It doesn't matter if you're on the "left" or the "right." Every country has a shitty deal under the agree…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:23 AM
3

Do people here believe that Men's Rights groups are right wing? To be fair, a lot of the prominent MRA's are right wing or right-libertarian. Paul Elam, Karen Straughan, Janet Bloomfield (a Trump supporter, no less), Milo (though he probably wouldn't identify as an "MRA"), etc. etc. The "base" however seems to be made up of all political persuasions (left-libertarians are at minimum a large minority). Feminism attached itself to the left in the 70's (though began as a rich conservative woman's m…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:51 AM
10

That exact point was made by Cassie Jaye (filmmaker of the forthcoming documentary "The Red Pill"): Another source of resistance, she says, are, “People who don’t know anything about the men’s rights movement. The most common reaction amongst feminists is, ‘why are you giving them a platform to speak?’ I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve heard that. Yet there are documentaries about the Westboro Baptist Church and about skinheads, yet they are so fearful of this topic, and I’ve started t…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:37 AM
2

The TPP is a fucking nightmare. Any politician who votes for it should be considered a traitor to their nation.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:59 AM
1

Also essential viewing. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:53 AM
5

I'm with ya. Hardcore leftist on economic issues but libertarian on social issues. Feminism has largely destroyed the traditional left, and part of me thinks it was by design.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:39 AM
5

I doubt her arguments come from a place of ignorance, unfortunately. She makes a living being a feminist.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:35 AM
3

I agree with most of what you said, but do not identify as a conservative. Honestly I think the only way of solving these problems is to create an anarchistic system based on political and economic egalitarianism. Otherwise we only have two choices: reducing women's rights or supporting unrestrained hypergamy. The latter results in the majority of men being marginalized (the current situation) and ripe for revolution. The former keeps men in a position of workhorse/wage slave and women in a posi…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:31 AM
36

I just emailed the CBC and asked them why -- when the subject was "men's rights" -- they didn't have an actual men's rights advocate on the show. Karen Straughan would be an ideal choice. I suggest others contact the CBC and request that Ms. Straughan be invited on to speak. I also reject the idea propagated by the sympathetic panelist that MRA groups are conservative. I see people of all political persuasions involved in the MRM.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:13 AM
1

Most men don't want to date women taller than them either. What is objectionable, of course, is that men are shamed for having standards, such as seeking a virgin (good luck) or even a non-promiscuous woman. God forbid a man desires a feminine woman who enjoys pleasing her man. We're supposed to be content with angry ball busting feminists who regard relationships as a battlefield. The real problem with female sexual selection is hypergamy. We can't have "equality" if the vast majority of women …
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:08 AM
4

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:55 AM
6

Here is the top rated comment: If the rate of suicide for women was 4x that of men, there would be plenty of blame assigned to society - and especially plenty of blame heaped on men. But when men kill themselves in appalling numbers, we blame it on . . . who else? Men, of course. Our society refuses to acknowledge that it - society - is driving men to despair and suicide. Men are not killing themselves because they have poor coping skills. They are not killing themselves because they are alcohol…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:52 AM
2

Must-see. Should be stickied. Edit: hopefully the mods will at least consider a sticky on Nov. 11th.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:20 AM
1

Congratulations, you just posted yet another flippin' article which is based on the UK The first graph alone shows that Australia has a larger gender gap than Britain on the issue of teenage "underachievers." What point were you trying to make? That Australians care even less than British people about the problems affecting boys? Now that you understand that there is a gap, what do you intend to do about it? Also congratulations in linking yet another news article for your so called high quality…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:52 AM
1

Where is my "thank you" for educating you about the fact that the Globe and Mail is not a "tabloid" newspaper but a highly respected publication? Not sure if you read the article you just linked but it outlines biological reasons for the falling behind and gives no credence to this being a sexism issue You admit that there are major "biological differences" in how boys and girls learn. Yet, last time I checked, we don't have gender segregated public schools. That must mean that a particular lear…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:49 AM
1

Lol. The Globe and Mail is a "tabloid" website? It's considered the most respected news source in Canada. Here, a source from Australia. It took me ten seconds on Google: http://www.essentialkids.com.au/education/school/primary-school/why-schools-are-failing-our-boys-20130517-2jqfh
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:25 AM
1

I just gave you the Globe and Mail. If you're looking for more results just fucking google it. Edit: Apparently you didn't realize that the above paragraph was referring to Australia. Here: Mr. West said that elite schools tend to focus more on closing the achievement gap [IN AUSTRALIA] than working class schools. Parents, he said, haven't been shy to hammer on school doors and ask principals how they're addressing the issue. "Boys underachievement continues to be a problem," he said
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:15 AM
1

Efforts have been made, but the programs haven't been very effective. In Australia as in the rest of the first world, boys are falling way behind. Part of this is due to systemic discrimination (catering to female learning styles, punishing and drugging boys for natural behavior), part of this is due to the overabundance of female teachers (female teachers tend to discriminate against boys). None of this is a mystery. Just read Christina Hoff Sommers book. Edit: from the article: Mr. West said t…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:48 AM
1

"Boys are having problems at school. They are experiencing learning difficulties and behavioural problems, and the literacy gap between boys and girls is increasing." Those words, on a government news release dated June 19, 2000, set into motion one of the most ambitious inquiries into boys education and resulted in millions of dollars being poured into schools to close the achievement gap. But the success of those programs has largely been muted, and they appear to have faded into the backgroun…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 06:05 AM
6

Reminds me of the excellent Michael Mann docu-drama "The Insider," about the guy who blew the whistle on the fact that tobacco companies were/are genetically engineering tobacco to be more addictive. As soon as the trouble started and his livelihood became at risk, she bailed -- with the kids, of course.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 09:33 AM
18

Gotta love that loyalty. Evidently she was not in "love" with her husband but his bank account.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:15 PM
29

Contrary to stereotypes about sexual performance and masculinity, men interviewed in a large international study reported that being seen as honorable, self-reliant and respected was more important to their idea of masculinity than being seen as attractive, sexually active or successful with women. “Many meanings, positive and negative, are attached to the term, ‘masculinity,'” said Julia Heiman, director of The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University and an author of this study. “To ask a large …
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:11 PM
2

You've heard of "so bad it's good." This is so bad it's fucking glorious. Perhaps "bad" is the wrong word. This is some next level Dada shit. Bravo. A Youtube guy wrote: Magnificent, splendorous, eloquent and fills my heart with jubilation.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:46 PM
9

I agree. To think that this hateful woman is actually teaching impressionable students is horrifying. On the bright side it was really refreshing to see her get demolished by rational, humane people on reddit.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:39 PM
59

So....feminists feel threatened by pieces of plastic.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:16 PM
1

I’m really starting to question whether that movement has ever been made up of anything other than authoritarians. Read your history. The feminist colonization of the "left" is pretty recent.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:01 PM
2

You have to remember that you are a victim of propaganda. Once you realize that, you should have an easier time understanding the situation of men in Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:48 AM
0

I think there are many ideas in marxism that are dangerous to a free society I agree. However the same is true of capitalist ideologues like Milton Friedman. I think we can do better than capitalism and communism.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 07:58 AM
1

I'm assuming this is why all traditionalist cultures seem to be obsessed with female virginity before marriage. Evidently men and women are different. Male promiscuity doesn't seem to have any effect on spousal loyalty, whereas female promiscuity is a time bomb. This problem can be solved easily without affecting the liberty of women: repeal unfair custody laws, unfair alimony laws, and no-fault divorce (passed by Ronald Reagan, ironically enough). This way women can continue to slut it up to th…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:40 AM
10

Comments are all negative, even on a leftist blog -- a sign of progress. (I remember when the left used to be sex positive...sigh) The feminist author is talking about men in prison. Evidently she would rather men rape one another than have access to naughty pictures. What a horrible human being.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:30 AM
3

Chivalry is the conservative woman's version of feminism.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:20 AM
2

Actually, feminists are completely fine with conservative women. They just bark "internalized misogyny" and "right wing" and "Stepford wife" and that's that. What they are truly terrified of are non-conservative women who reject feminism. If feminists lose their left cover they are toast.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:18 AM
1

I hate upvoting feminists but realz before feelz. Still, the "lady" thing is perhaps being used ironically. A lady was a righteous, respectable, dignified, powerful woman who cared about society and her family. So it doesn't exactly jibe with most modern women, and certainly not your average feminist.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:14 AM
2

Marx was not a feminist. He was primarily concerned with the exploitation of working class males. Feminism derived from rich conservative women. Go ahead and look it up. I will give you this: during the 70's, feminists sunk their fangs into the left in order to bolster their "oppression" bonafides, and have basically destroyed it as a result. patriarchy analysis has replaced class analysis. You're right that conspiracies have probably been involved. For example, a leaked FBI memo from 1969 state…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:07 AM
1

Hillary winning the Dem nomination = guaranteed Trump "you're fired" victory. Something to consider....
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:01 AM
3

It's only because men can't talk about their fee-fees /s
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:58 AM
19

Holy shit. And this is r/science!? The exact same thing seems to happen to any space that feminists colonize. It doesn't matter if it's r/science (no faith allowed, theoretically) or r/anarchism (supposedly anti-authoritarian). As soon as they colonize a group the censorship and feelz before realz begins.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:08 AM
63

This was the biggest ass-whooping I've ever seen in an AMA. She was utterly demolished with facts and revealed to be a complete hypocrite and fraud. No wonder feminists hate debates so much and invariably end up resorting to censorship.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:42 AM
4

I see no evidence whatsoever that men are in the habit of being rude on public transport. At least no more than women. Almost all of the photos of the alleged "manspreading" epidemic show men sitting alone with no one on either side of them. In reality, "manspreading" was conceived by feminists as a form of "patriarchical dominance." I'm not shitting you. That's literally what they believe. What is the actual cause? Men have a higher center of gravity and differently shaped hips. It's natural fo…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:18 AM
2

She is right, Margaret Thatcher never once played the gender card, that was why she appealed to both men and women. Thatcher was beloved by the British oligarchy but despised by most British people. She may not have played the gender card but she played the nationalist card to boost her dismal approval ratings (Falklands); she attacked working people, primarily working class men; she supported police state measures; she supported fascist butchers like Auguste Pinochet (and in the case of Pol Pot…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:09 AM
4

Don't forget the imminent threat of Sharia Law, the extreme danger posed by the latest country we need to bomb (Democrats tend to take a different approach -- "humanitarian" intervention -- the result is the same), the black menace, the labor union menace, the environmentalist menace, etc. etc. Honestly I think Americans have a tendency to grossly exaggerate the differences between the two parties. They both serve corporations, banks and the military industrial intelligence complex. (granted the…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter