TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Sitty_Shoonerism_ Archive

View 0 posts and 103 comments by _Sitty_Shoonerism_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But this so called "toxic masculinity" was vastly greater 50 years ago and likewise there were far fewer mass shootings and easier access to guns. How do these idiots couple that with their ideology?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:10 AM
-1

The so called "toxic male culture" was way worse 50 years ago by feminist definitions yet the school shootings were non existent. Hmmm....
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:09 AM
8

FFS quit being such a disingenuous troll with these fake "gotcha" questions. The accusers saw her hypocrisy years later and got fed up with it. They likely didn't even care that much at the time it happened so didn't bother doing anything official. Simple as that. If there exists a "scorned" interpersonal relationship between accuser and the accused, or a partisan political motivation to tarnish a reputation, or a self-benefiting dynamic for the accuser to "come forward," then it becomes much mo…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:39 AM
0

Nope, totally wrong. It's a baby by definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/baby https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child A baby is an extremely young child and a child can be a born OR unborn person. So by definition an embryo is a baby and also a person. It's hard to grasp why you claim I'm using propaganda when you've dishonestly twisted 3 words already, contradicting dictionaries, textbooks, and common sense, to fit your agenda... They didn't choose to live. No one did…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:08 AM
1

You're touting pro life propaganda and hiding behind assumed logical fallacies so you don't have to defend your argument. And here I thought all I did was tell you the definition listed in a textbook and explain a false conclusion about harvesting kidneys... Let me make my point more clear. Your body? Your choice. Her body? Her choice. You don't take that choice away. She doesn't take your choice away. Baby's body. Not a logical fallacy to say abortion is killing a separate organism with its own…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:30 PM
1

You made a false premise implication that if something is not allowed it must be correct to forbid it. That was my point. It's meaningless to say "you can't take my kidney so you also can't XYZ" because it some places the opposite is true. What one locality allows/disallows doesn't make it universally right. Symbiote, parasite, same thing. It's an external organism taking resources from its host. *symbiont Lol no it's not the same thing. I just explained the common sense reason why it's not the …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:39 PM
1

Definitely wrong. If anything it's a symbiont. It takes resources from the mother but spreads the mother's genes in the future, which is one of the greatest benefits to organism, if no the greatest. Calling them parasites is wrong by common sense.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:27 PM
3

A embryo/fetus isn't a parasite, by both definition and common sense (biology textbook definition of a parasite is an organism of a different species). They most closely resemble the definition of a symbiont, if anything, since they are taking resources from the host (mother) but in return provide one of the greatest possible benefits to a host organism: propagating genes. No species would exist if it had a biological desire to put parasites in itself. In many countries you can be forced to dona…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:24 PM
1

how far I think women should be "going" to accomodate the wishes of the father Your use of the word 'accomodate' is quite telling as to your gynocentric thinking. A man having the option of opting out of parenting has absolutely nothing to do with women accommodating anything. It's basic common sense equality.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:12 PM
0

If a reasonable comment goes that far over your head you really should just not bother wasting time with a response.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:40 AM
1

The post made it to /r/all where people don't ascribe to the echo chamber consensus that feminism is inherently bad and At r/all with 9k score at 66% upvote.... you might want to rethink this statement. The majority of reddit (2/3rds) upvotes the sentiment but the thread itself is being brigaded by people with their minority opinions (probably the ~18% of the population who identify as feminists) who also upvote non MRA sentiments to the top.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:03 AM
1

I'd guarantee women are vastly more likely to perceive and report sexual harassment than men though, even if the actual rates are the same. It's kind of disingenuous to make a whole campaign that typically shames men when you accept the reality of uncertainty of the rates that it's happening.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:46 AM
14

I've literally read comments saying that attraction was so great that an encounter was tantamount to having a lack of consent. Sometimes it's just hard to believe people can be that stupid or think women can have such a lack of agency.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:22 AM
10

Their point it to create a tribalistic rallying call for leftist progressives. If you disagree with their concept of "privilege" you are to be thought of as sexist and possibly racist and should be regarded as an enemy to any progressive political party. The disagreement will later be used against you. If you're a male (specifically white) you're supposed to just lock step and agree with them, no questions asked. It's almost like a litmus test of obedience. It serves no other purpose.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 09:31 PM
13

If he stabbed her with a deadly weapon instead do you think the judge would have said it would damage his career to convict? Edit- um I guess some people need the reference: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/oxford-student-judge-suggested-bright-prison-spared-jail-stabbing/
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:04 PM
14

She applauds/supports a known child rapist. Everything she says about social issues, well everything for that matter, is voided and irrelevant. She's trash. https://www.snopes.com/meryl-streep-applaud-roman-polanski/
/r/MensRights04/01/18 05:52 PM
1

I don't particularly understand the comments in that article. Usually dailymail is pretty good for calling out gender hypocrisy but they're all supporting her. She was convicted because it didn't look like self defense but 5 years later she got off because of claimed mental problems at the time, or whatever. So she murdered someone in an apparent non-self-defense fashion because she was in an altered mental state. No way around that based on what the article says yet they are still defending her…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:18 AM
2

she was missing, hence not in an institution. The article even says the retrial was in 2015 and she's apparently been free ever since. Do you think a male who stabbed his girlfriend to death due to "mental issues" would be on the streets after 5 years? Not a chance.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:09 AM
19

haha even huffcompost admits it
/r/MensRights01/01/18 09:52 PM
1

It's a half truth https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12119-000-1023-7 Some studies show disparities at 2:1 ratios and other studies show 1:1 rates of men and women forcing a member of the opposite sex into sexual contact or being forced/coerced into having sex. One study even shows college women reported 9% have used a weapon or threat of a weapon to coerce a male to "obtain sexual contact." The whole "men are sexual predators and women are innocent" is practically a myth. Men and wome…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:04 PM
2

I forget where I saw the stats but when men's sex interactions with women are standardized to the same "abuse metrics" that give rise to women's high assault numbers the actual rates of assault end up being quite similar for both genders. Things like having sex while so drunk you have trouble walking/talking/remembering or even blacked out drunk would be considered sexual assault or rape for women, and men do that all the time. Generally speaking the numbers aren't as vastly different than what …
/r/MensRights22/12/17 01:49 PM
4

Depression can be so severe that people suffer from very severe delusions, some of which may lead them to kill their children. If I just killed my kid that's exactly what I'd say too if it meant keeping me out of jail. When the burden of proof is merely saying you were depressed there is something wrong with the system. Warzone PTSD is worse, I guarantee it, but do you think a man who just killed his kid would get a pass and walk free if he said he was depressed?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:24 AM
1

nope she wasn't raped, just fingered, Prove it. I'm calling you a liar. but it sounds like you have a problem with blacks Sounds like you have an actual problem reading into things too much buddy. I point out an obvious and egregious discrepancy based on the facts as stated and you imply I'm subhuman racist scum? Are you kidding us?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:23 PM
4

An individual named Sir Young, also 18, told a judge in court that he raped a 14 year old who repeatedly said no, and in court the victim maintained she was in fact raped. He got community service. The leftists who create these memes never talk about it though because he's black. These people pushing this agenda aren't just anti men, they are anti white.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:27 PM
3

for every lie that gets caught many more are never exposed. So how many false accusations would that be?
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:22 PM
4

"Probably" He was pointing out many women do think a rock is worth months of rent, which is completely 100% true. He never said all of them think that or that any women think a ring is more important than love. He didn't mention love at all actually. He just noted his perspective probably would be different.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 10:07 PM
1

the bartender is responsible to an extent. There are actual laws concerning this and if the patron gets a DUI or gets in a car crash the bartender could be in trouble if he gave too many drinks to someone. Though it's hard to prove. Enabling someone's bad or immoral behavior is bad and immoral in and of itself. And it's also bad for society. If you're a farmer and sell fertilizer to someone and you know it will be used to make a bomb for terrorism but you don't tell anyone are you a moral person…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 02:11 AM
1

You didn't read what I wrote. I said YOU are cherry picking their findings. Funding ISIS? That's just comical and insane. Moreover, which administration was in charge for the last 8 years when ISIS came to power huh??? Keep on supporting your terrorists. And "uncle tom" is an insult applied to black people. Trying to pretend it can be used to anyone who supports capitalism is the pinnacle of brain dead ignorance. Only edgy i-am-very-smart idiots use it in a non-racial context.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:48 PM
1

how exactly did you reach the conclusion that "the right" is the problem when Islam is on the exact same list and has twice the terrorism related murders (and it's roughly 5% the sample size too)?? That's the most blatant in-your-face cherry picking I've ever seen. and that doesn't excuse your whataboutism. In fact, according to your logic where "more murders = greater problem" then you should have concluded "capitalism isn't the problem, the problem is islam" Aside from your cherry picked whata…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:40 PM
3

So you support a terrorist group because of baseless whataboutism. That's all we needed to know. And anywhere on the spectrum between "fascist style capitalism" and "full socialism" (whatever definition du jour that is) there will still exist the same amount of bad people. Pretending that capitalism enables these bad people more than socialism is just ignorance. The world would be no better off with these idealized/impossible socialist utopias that these terrorist groups keep dreaming about, whi…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:18 AM
4

Well most of mens, and the worlds problems are to do with capitalism but anyway. Problems exist because of bad people. Bad people would exist in the same proportion if the world suddenly turned to socialism. Probably worse given that human rights violations are ubiquitous in socialist regimes. Antifa was labelled a domestic terrorist group by homeland security. Why on earth are you calling a domestic terrorist group the good guys?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:56 PM
1

A crude sexual joke aimed at an individual is harassment. Implying you eagerly want to grab the breasts of a sleeping coworker is a crude sexual joke aimed at an individual, therefore it's harassment. Harassment is inappropriate. Bing bang boom. I watch media that has all kinds of crude sexual jokes. They are of course funny to anyone with a sense of humor. But when they're at the expense of an individual that's when it becomes a problem. I'm much more forgiving towards crude jokes in the workpl…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:36 PM
3

You mean they're just now finally being held to the same standard as everyone else who works for the government?
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:22 AM
2

not to mention she's wearing a flak/kevlar jacket. He might as well "grope" a dinner plate. But that doesn't excuse him, it just points out there's a difference between groping a woman to get your rocks off and making a crude inappropriate sexually-harassing joke at the expense of a woman.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:16 AM
0

allegations involved fraud[17] or an involvement in drugs and weapons LOL are they not sure which one it involved? Fraud OR drugs? I'm going to assume it's fraud and the rest were baseless tangential legalease allegations made by a team of lawyers working for a very "scorned" woman. The goal was just to get him deported, not actually prove he's guilty. I'm sure in the covert, ethically questionable deep state spy world created by the Patriot Act the burden of proof is far lower than we would exp…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:31 AM
7

Until she realizes that she's weaker and picks up an object. It's not ok in any circumstance and just because men can ultimately do more damage does not make it less serious for women to physically hit men. The 5'2 actress Emma Roberts was arrested for beating the shit out of her 5'11 boyfriend Evan Peters. Obviously, it happened because the guy didn't defend himself to his full potential, which is another aspect of abuse; learned helplessness where you just let your abuser do whatever he/she wa…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 11:48 AM
1

Darn, I read some of the comments. Without fail, the first possible counter explanation is the "correct" explanation in their minds. They assume that since the author is a common denominator in all the anecdotes it must be her fault, therefore it is her fault. Case closed. The first excuse to deflect blame from the female employees is automatically the explanation, always.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:27 AM
2

Someone should tell this "badass femminist" that the 2004 Asia Tsunami wasn't caused by climate change. Tsunamis have absolutely nothing to do with climate; they're caused by seismic activity. But I guess in this author's mind all natural disasters are sexist. Stupid sexist planet earth.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 10:05 PM
2

No michelle is a moron, we know this by the idiotic things she says. Passing law classes at some expensive ivy league school doesn't mean she's intelligent, it means she worked hard. The bottom tier individuals at those schools are average IQ. Just like Michelle O clearly is from simple observation.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 07:38 PM
0

Have you ordered your 8 year countdown calendar yet? I'm selling calendars that count down the number of days Trump has left in office to help ease the suffering of people like you. It's been very profitable.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:40 AM
0

haha so you're one of those people still in denial that Trump is the president (your president if in the US). Always hilarious. You're going to be in denial for a looong 7 more years.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 05:32 AM
0

Just like last time when you couldn't wait for the tears after Trump loses? About that....he won and it was liberals who were crying.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 03:16 AM
0

The 8 years he'll be in office is actually 2 terms not 1.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 11:24 PM
12

I've never understood how anyone can think this woman is intelligent.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 10:24 PM
11

Our analysis suggests that the difference in promotion rates between men and women in this company was due not to their behavior but to how they were treated. UGGGHH. Proving one theory wrong among a myriad of competing theories does NOT automatically make another theory correct. Of course we all know why this happens. There's a limited number of "approved" theories and when one theory tanks they just jump ship to the next one until that one tanks, repeat. I pointed this out to someone else rece…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 10:19 PM
7

After apologizing to that failed actress Bush Sr., 93, also apologized for parking his car on the moon and forgetting to turn of the toaster this morning.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 02:47 AM
2

Interesting stuff. It makes total sense though but I'm surprised none of the outspoken "progressives" in modern times address this topic. Requiring MTF individuals to register is kind of a metaphorical slap in the face reminding them that they're still males. I guess approaching the topic would step on too many toes and just highlight the current draft inequality so feminists and other progressives just ignore it altogether. Typical.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:44 PM
2

they already have effectively equal levels of T. A few percentage points makes no difference. They'll naturally fluctuate that much on an hourly basis. Compared to women though it's almost two orders of magnitude difference at all times.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 09:02 AM
2

women are 10x worse at handling rejection which is why the phrase "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" exists. this author is a nutcase.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 08:37 AM
2

If we're keeping selective service we might as well not limit it by sex or gender. wait if I claim I think I'm a woman on the inside does that mean I as a biological male don't have to register with selective service?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 08:16 AM
1

I don't think it's fair, that's absurd, and that is the exact reason you're a hypocrite and thus your opinions are irrelevant and completely invalid regarding anything related to men's rights or sexual assault issues. If someone like you were on a jury it would be unfair because you're a bias man-hating piece of garbage and are utterly incapable of seeing things objectively/fair.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 09:33 PM
3

I didn't dodge anything. You cherry picked a microcosm of reddit as your example, you absolute moron, after you already changed the subject and intentionally dodged 5 times when I asked the question. The answer to the question you refuse to answer, which you and I both already know the answer to, will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are inherently bias. That's why you laughably keep refusing to answer such an utterly simple and obvious question. You are absolutely no different than a p…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 11:37 PM
3

Answer the question. I dare you.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:46 AM
3

Quit.dodging.the.question. I already answered one of your tangents now answer the fucking question. And no it's not more common. They literally "teach men not to rape" [your own disgusting words actually] because most people default to that absurd line of thinking that all men have an inherent propensity towards raping. Reddit as a whole would overwhelmingly be on her side and believe anything she said. GTFO with that nonsense that it's more common for men to think it's "acceptable" for abuse. W…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:43 AM
1

Aaaaaaaaand Quit dodging the question. If anyone on the jury had your mentality is it a fair trial?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:06 PM
2

Of course not (and they typically think the opposite). Now answer my question.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:22 PM
3

HE WAS CONVICTED. HOLY FUCK. What are you not getting about this? Question, are all men innocent of all crimes? Are men all innocent even after being proven guilty? This is getting boring so one last yes or no question. When you say he was convicted and people like you on the jury share your bias belief: That's how all men are :) just fucking dumb rapists Do you think that's a fair trial? Yes or no. If the jury thinks all men are dumb fucking rapists is that a fair trial?
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:30 AM
1

According to that Dove commercial men can be mothers, so it must be easy. http://www.abc15.com/news/national/dove-features-transgender-mother-in-new-ad-campaign
/r/MensRights14/10/17 11:47 PM
1

Again you're just moving the goalpost and exposing your hatred and stereotyping of men more and more, that's why I'm still responding; to expose you to everyone else how much you hate and stereotype men :). It's actually been amusingly simple to expose your hatred. You don't even know if I'm a male but you think I fall into your evil stereotype of men that exists in your head therefore I must be a male. It's so obvious how you think. Anyway. I don't know the specific evidence of the trial, maybe…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 11:25 PM
3

hahaha awwww how cute. push the goalpost sweety. You were wrong about "crying during," I proved this, and now you're trying to distract from you being wrong with the sentiment "well he was found guilty anyway and that's all that matters". You read into the statement thinking he was aggressive WHILE she was crying because you have a mental sickness and hate men. Thats all. There is no way to interpret that he was aggressive "while she was crying" given the information but you happily did anyway. …
/r/MensRights14/10/17 09:39 PM
5

Great you posted exactly what I knew you were going to post and what I already read. Now to the details of why you're wrong: grabbing at the victim’s breasts “really hard” to the point that the victim started crying. "To the point" does not imply it continued afterwards. I can run "to the point" I pass out. Does that mean I ran after I passed out? Of fucking course not. I could have stirred heated eggs "to the point" that they started coagulating. Does that imply I stirred them after they starte…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:22 AM
4

No no no sweetheart. Quote me the part so I can hold your hand baby step you into showing why your interpretation is wrong.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:38 AM
5

You're too dumb to follow the logic of anything I'm saying, I overestimated your intelligence and wasted my time. Yes, it DID say she was crying during it. Did you not read the article? What a fucking dumb cunt you are 😂😂 hahahahaha PROVE IT you sexist piece of shit
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:34 AM
3

She was crying and telling him to stop, and he didn't. Is that not assault to you? "It's weird how u/VodkaKitty is prone to just make up lies left and right...." Didn't say she was crying during. You're making that up because you instinctively read into a story from the perspective men are evil and think this man would continue to have sex with her while she's sobbing her eyes out. Unbelievable. and yet accuse me of lying. Pathetic. And even if he had kept going, that's still assault. How many t…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:23 AM
7

you are such a complete moron: Philip Queree, 37, was taken to court for repeatedly grabbing the woman's breasts hard and pulling her hair while the couple had intercourse. So which is it? He grabbed them repeatedly and she said don't do that again and he didn't do it anymore OR she said don't touch my breasts and he grabbed then multiple times while she continued to have sex with him but that was "obviously not continuing to give consent for sex"??? How long have you hated men?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:00 AM
3

So he committed rape then? Well why wasn't he charged with rape huh? Yeah you clearly didn't think that one through did you. I'm glad your misandrist sexism is shining through for everybody to see how much of a bigoted nutjob you are.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:32 PM
2

So If the man who was stabbed also repeatedly said "don't stab me" that means the graphics go back to being equally honest huh? Because both headlines left out that the victims verbally expressed that they didn't want the action in question to happen to them. LMAO!! You know what I'll just go ahead and assume the stabbed victim screamed "stop" so we can adopt the working theory that there's no dishonesty in the graphic.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:24 PM
3

Yes is does matter. If she continued to give consent for sex it absolutely matters.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:13 PM
1

Did she continue having sex with him?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:11 PM
1

uhh the part where you willfully don't choose to walk away but instead continue what you're doing. Is that a serious question??? I'm talking about a boxing match here. Not a street fight. If you say stop "hitting me" but the other person continues then you are not a willful participant. However, if you say stop "hitting me that hard" but person continues "hitting you that hard" and you continue boxing as well, then you are participating of your free will because your actions show you choose to r…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:07 PM
5

If you're not drugged and the person is not forcing you then yes you gave a free pass to all intimate touching if you already gave consent for sex. If you don't like it then leave. You have free will. You can't retroactively call it assault because you feel like you were "in between" a place where the touching was annoying but NOT annoying enough to get up and leave. It's like getting in a boxing match with a boxer and saying "I don't like you punching that hard hold back" but he continues to hi…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:00 AM
5

It took 4 Jurassic Park movies over 20 years before they finally showed a female being eaten by a dinosaur. People still complained.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:37 PM
64

Of course it counts as discrimination. It also pushes the stereotype that women have a lesser ability to ignore thoughts of negative criticism compared to men but feminists ignore that and try to flip the narrative, like with everything they do, and say it's about the patriachytm pushing thin culture and creepy ogling men. It's no different than saying there needs to be a white's only section of the gym because because some whites are concerned about working out around blacks because they "stare…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:26 PM
2

The evidence is to strong and I believe proves otherwise. It's a solid theory and conforms to evolutionary theory extremely well. But it has nothing to do with implying women are more promiscuous than men. You seemed intent on implying this has something to do with who's more promiscuous, men or women, but nothing you said there suggests who's more promiscuous. We just know that both are promiscuous but some males had a trick to bypass the system, which was only a temporary advantage since all m…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:29 AM
2

His point about our eveolutionary sex traits when it come to our reproductive organs says it all. The fact that the male penis is a ejaculation removal tool more than an ejaculation insertion tool is extremely rare in mammalian biology. The implications of this biological adaptation says it all Mmmmm you can only infer the odds of cheating/competition are high in the first place based off the "ejaculation removal" shape. It doesn't have any bearing on which sex actually cheats more. I'm not sure…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:41 AM
8

Looking forward to the spaceships 22 years from now. (purple frame in the middle)
/r/MensRights17/08/17 01:40 PM
2

They would but only in a forced way to marginalize an MRA complaint. Another in this thread mentioned if their phraseology was "10 people killed including 3 white people" then it's clearly condescending to non whites. Interpreting "10 people and X women" as an insult to women is just a wildly creative distraction that just barely, barely falls in the realm of "not total BS." It's part and parcel of feminism strategy to take an issue that has a vastly greater effect on men but flip it and say it'…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:41 PM
7

Great explanation and totally right. Despite this being common sense I've still seen feminists and other snowflakes creatively side step logic and invent ways of needing both equality and diversity at the same time. Usually they'll randomly start saying diversity actually means "unique experiences" or "unique perspectives" which can only come from certain groups and not white males. So they're still equal but their "experiences" or "perspectives" are different than white males so they need them …
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:35 PM
1

Also, a valid opinion does not mean it's objectively true. If you said the moon is brighter than the sun, it's a valid opinion. Validity has absolutely nothing to do with truth. LOL no. This is why I said don't answer that question because I knew you say something incredibly stupid like "the moon is brighter than the sun is a valid opinion." That is not a valid opinion to anyone but you. But I digress. This conversation is going nowhere. So I'll close with this: saying something "may rub some pe…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:13 PM
1

I showed why it's less likely to be sarcasm based on the text, you didn't show the opposite. No hypothetical distracts from the actual content. You might as well say he's being held at gun point so we shouldn't believe he holds the opinions he writes. Inventing zero-proof hypotheticals that might prove I'm wrong doesn't actually suggest I'm wrong. The burden of proof is on you at this point. Accepting that people have separate opinions as you has nothing to do with accepting their opinions as va…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:59 PM
1

I already proved your sarcasm concept has no merit. The rest is just going in circles. That's absolutely not how the world works. We live in democracies where we accept other people's opinions even if they are different from our own. no. "Accept" means both "endure without protest" and also "recognizing as true." You can't recognize as true two different opinions about the same subject at the same time but of course you can endure that opinion without protest. This is moving away from my point a…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:02 PM
1

He's not randomly inserting it, he's reviewing a movie. If there is a large and very much valid debate over the representation of PoC and females in movies, it is perfectly justifiable to touch upon this when reviewing a movie. There isn't. 20% of Americans think Obama wasn't born in America, that's way more than the number of SJW who think there's a mainstream problem with those PC topics. Yet it would totally be pandering something you believe in if you randomly inserted "there wasn't any sugg…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:23 PM
1

I already said acknowledging the idea is giving it credibility. Any critic would be out of their mind to randomly say "there were issues with the movie, and no expression of an inherently violent nature in black people might upset some, but still it's a good movie" because that would be acknowledging as justifiable the upset feelings from those upset people. It doesn't matter if some people think there some sort of inherent violent nature in POC. The critic would instantly be called racist. You …
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:22 AM
1

we need the story to have nurses saving countless mens lives, fixing leaks in the boileroom, and telling the captain how to do his job like an empowered woman would do! /s
/r/MensRights26/07/17 05:55 AM
1

He's not reading into it at all. If the review said "the special effects had a no XYZ and that might rub some people the wrong way" you can clearly see there's an implied problem with no XYZ.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 05:44 AM
1

What if they said "some people may be rubbed the wrong way since blacks are shown as smart and successful members of society"? Of course they didn't say that but you can see it's pretty clear that statement would be implying something deeper. Acknowledging an idea is giving it credibility. If I say there's some aspect that might be wrong with a movie I'm placing that aspect on the spectrum of credibility. Giving the sense that I feel it's wrong but I don't personally care etc. You can easily mak…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 05:25 AM
7

I'd call her an egalitarian, not a feminist. Egalitarian actually implies you care about equality.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 10:28 PM
1

But there's an important difference. The difference in your abridged version of TM is that you said "men are inherently..." whereas women's "toxic behavior" of hypoagency is something anybody could say is due to external factors and thus ends up being men's fault. IE anyone could make the armchair psychology argument that women shift blame because "toxic masculinity" is a form of oppression and this forms learned helplessness where women automatically shift blame to men b/c they think it's a "ma…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:31 PM
1

That seems like a cop out definition of "toxic femininity." It's almost as if it could boil down to "women are less confident than men and usually blame them tee hee." Whereas the alleged "toxic masculinity" is typically regarded as the manifestation of a disease that needs constant reprogramming from birth to death to ensure men don't express their in inherent "evil nature." Toxic masculinity is a BS concept. It cant exist unless their is a counterpart in women that in no way relates to men. Ot…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:21 PM
1

I would disagree. Some people think they're cats trapped in humans' bodies. It's not a mismatch between the "human and cat" parts of their brains. If it's biological then the same mechanism would have to work for male to female or female to male "transgender" people. This makes it very hard to say the phenomenon is entirely biological. The switching genitals analogy has lots of problems. For instance a limited expression of androgen insensitivity syndrome would be a great explanation for "transg…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 02:01 PM
3

you're not wrong but did we really need a study to tell us men find young thin women more attractive?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 12:45 PM
6

erm maybe she's not the best person to talk to suicidal people...haha but screw her I hope she gets prison.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:44 PM
1

How is that not considered spam? If I create 50 subreddits and 50 bots to tell 500,000 people I disagree with they're banned that's nothing more than a propaganda campaign.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 04:37 AM
13

Please don't compare male and female circumcision When feminists say "her body her choice" does this concept not apply to males and circumcision?
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:02 AM
1

haha they're majoring in "compliant sheep" studies.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 07:47 AM
4

You're probably dumb enough to think there's nothing wrong with paying an assassin to kill someone huh? After all the payee isn't assassinating someone WITH anything. I really need to block this conversation because you're too much of a dumbass but it's getting kind of funny.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 12:21 AM
3

"talking to them with words about a plot to assassinate someone"...let that concept rattle through your vacant head for a long time and then piss off.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:26 PM
2

....she was planning for someone to die by her actions of speaking. If I convinced a mentally handicapped person to assassinate the president I'd be arrested for that too: I'd be a conspirator.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:53 AM
3

If I convince a mentally handicapped person to walk up to your family and shoot them in the face does that mean I'm guilty of no criminal wrongdoing? It was just words I used after all, no physical acts on my part. To be more specific, however, merely saying words is still in fact an act. You would be arrested for the act of saying words that describe a plan to assassinate the president.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:39 PM
1

I'm not saying an abortion ban will solve the egalitarian issues but I want to point out that I think the "back ally" abortions is a concept cooked up from a different time in history that would be extremely difficult to implement today. It would be too easy for a doctor to get caught performing an illegal operation these days. The med equipment and drugs costs a lot out of pocket and can be tracked and if something went wrong there will be people out for blood looking for who was responsible. T…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 12:05 PM
6

Depraved Heart Murder We have certain laws because they make society a better place. Not because we strive for our laws to adhere to a philosophical absolute in every conceivable circumstance.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 11:37 AM
3

That woman should get a job on SNL. Her Trump impression is 10x better than the impression from that bloviating moron Alec Baldwin.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:36 AM
12

There's a "women in STEM" office at my college, that I pay for with my tuition, that provides counseling services only for women because they're "underrepresented." But would a feminist be okay with a "men in college" office that provides services only to men because they are underrepresented in college/universities? I think their heads would explode at the thought of that.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter