TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Wally Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by _Wally on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

In our view, the filings display a very troubling pattern of abuse towards “Jackie”, a woman profiled in that article, which cannot be allowed to continue. Holy shit. These imbeciles are digging their own graves. Newsflash misandrists: the MRM is here. And we are going to fucking bury you. Not with proxy violence -- your preferred method -- but with facts.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:05 AM
7

I agree with you. You just got the "anecdotal" thing wrong.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:58 AM
1

Congratulations for not making a single point in support of your "argument." Listen here cuck, some of us care about the rights of boys and men, and your hollow whining will not stop us. You're a little piece of shit, I would fucking smack you if you were in front of me, but it doesn't mater; we will win, and you feminists will lose. It's inevitable.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:51 AM
5

So...men suffer institutional discrimination because they receive on average 63% longer prison sentences. That's much larger than the racial gap. How do you feel about that?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:48 AM
3

holy hell the stupidity in here hurts. Don't look for intelligent debate here, I think this is our version of feminists. Come again dipshit? Edit: Don't try to deny your comments you little bitch. Stand up for yourself and stand by your awful comments.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:43 AM
-3

Look here cuck, men and boys need rights. Genital integrity, parental rights etc. You may not care about men and boys or yourself, but we do. So go back to your feminist cuck-lair and fuck off you pathetic little piece of shit.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:37 AM
11

"anecdotal" Actually studies show that men receive 63% longer sentences. So that's actual "institutional oppression." As opposed to "manspreading."
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:34 AM
1

Unclench your butthole dude. You should be posting on r/feminism. Not r/mensrights. Some of us take science seriously.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 10:11 PM
1

Chagnon's work in particular is relevant because male Yanomamö The Yanomamo -- who were heavily influenced by domesticated societies -- are the most atypical hunter-gatherer band ever studied. But by all means use them as the typical example of hunter-gatherer bands. Pinker did so, after all. Like I said, the archeological record is clear. You're simply denying science like a creationist in favour of ideology.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:31 PM
2

My grandfather on my mother's side dropped bombs on Dresden. He is haunted not by the violence done to him but by the violence he did to other people. Like your grandfather he never wants to talk about it. He was just doing his "job," and he helped to defeat fascism while risking his life, but he knows he killed countless innocent people. How horrible would that be to live with? Killing innocent people for an essential cause? Does an "essential cause" require killing innocent people? Is it still…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:26 PM
2

I shall do so: you are brave.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:16 PM
1

I think you really need to read the other side of that as-of-yet not settled argument, I would read Napoleon Chagnon's body of work on the Yanomamö and Steven Pinker's Better Angels of our Nature. Also War Before Civilization: the Myth of the Peaceful Savage by Lawrence H. Keeley. I never claimed that "savages" were peaceful, just egalitarian. That is not disputed by anthropologists, or at least 99% of them. The issue of warfare and violence is another matter. You're right that it's disputed. Th…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:08 PM
6

Good rant. I'm surprised the mods stickied this 'cause the last paragraphs verge into Red Pill territory, and based on OP's other posts he has a pretty serious problem with women, but I think the overall message is worth examining. We are literally begging women not to abuse their power. This is a recipe for disaster. When Lord Acton said "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" he was not just referring to men. We are blinded by the "women are wonderful" effect. The Amer…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:45 PM
1

Men take risks, engage in competitive behaviour, physical violence, rigid hierarchical posturing etc. I don't disagree with your overall argument, but it's worth noting that "rigid hierarchies", or at least institutional hierarchies, have only existed for about 1% of human history. There's a great book about this titled "Hierarchy in the Forest: the evolution of egalitarian behaviour" by anthropologist Christopher Boehm. There is an incredibly strong impulse amongst human beings for equality. Th…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:01 PM
2

Yes it's quite good. "The Thin Red Line" is another interesting American war film, though Malick is an acquired taste. There's an intriguing history on this subject. War films naturally require a lot of hardware, and in the case of the US it is typically supplied by the Pentagon. However, the DOD insists on approving the script. Examples of films that the Pentagon approved: Saving Private Ryan, Pearl Harbor, Black Hawk Down, The Hurt Locker. Examples of films that the Pentagon did not approve: T…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:36 PM
1

I really think the issue of promoting men's groups on campuses should be at the forefront. Canadian feminists are trying very hard to ban said groups because they understand that a whole new generation of men could become aware of their rights -- or lack thereof.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:10 PM
8

4) Savagely manipulate his emotions. Sooo...standard operating procedure?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:13 PM
2

I'm now labelled "a shitty sexist" and made fun of in subsequent encounters. That sucks. There was a study done showing that when men treat women as equals, they are actually regarded as sexists. This is because "equality" would be a huge step down for women. Conclusion: women are the real sexists. I applaud you for speaking up. In reality, being considered a sexist is not that big a deal. We all act like it's akin to being considered a monster but women themselves don't seem to care all that mu…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:08 PM
1

The drunken genius Dr. Randomercam set this bitch straight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuEfoPdvTz4
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:50 PM
1

Ha ha true enough...but pride cometh before the fall...;)
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:33 PM
0

Part of the problem with baby killing is it's often attributed to post-partum psychosis (or depression) Sure. We love to make excuses for women who commit atrocities, even against babies. I'm not denying that PP-Dep exists, but it's not all that different than the legal defence for psychopathy. Or Munchausen by proxy -- possibly the most despicable crime of which human beings are capable. We are desperate -- desperate -- to make excuses for women, and equally desperate on the other side to not m…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:11 AM
4

Indeed. But as powerful as "Ryan" was, it doesn't hold a candle to the Russian film "Come and See" (Spielberg himself is a huge fan). Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-Ro0SZf438 It's difficult to fathom just how many Russian men and boys were slaughtered in WWII. And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, "Come and see". The film is little known in the US but deserves to be seen as perhaps the greatest wa…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:11 AM
3

Simply awesome. Congrats to everyone involved with CAFE.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:45 AM
3

Why would I disagree with the facts? You're absolutely correct that the US government supports radical Islam. It's a simple divide and conquer strategy based on Dulles' notion that "Arab secular nationalism" must be avoided at all costs. That doesn't mean that Western propaganda doesn't simultaneously support "female oppression" narratives vis a vis Islamic nations. You can't bomb and/or occupy a country without some sort of justification, and "womyz are opprezzed!" beats the hell out of "we nee…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:19 AM
2

Somehow it doesnt surprise me you have your tongue in Democrat ass, and support that hag. I would sooner vote for Mickey Mouse than Hillary Clinton. So no, I don't "support that hag." But that doesn't change the fact that she uses "oppression of women" to justify mass slaughter campaigns in the Middle East -- 4 million dead Muslims since 1980. And yes, feminists like H.C. and Madeline Albreight have held conferences on "women's oppresionz" to justify NATO expansion and general war. You're a fuck…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:57 AM
2

Ever heard of Hillary Clinton or Madeleine Albright? Feminists that critique Islam all the time in order to justify military occupation/intervention and have infinitely more power than your average blogger? -- and infinitely more power than you? Shitpost. Should indeed be deleted by the mods but probably won't be. They didn't delete Judgy Bitch's fantastically stupid "Donald Trump is awesome" post.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:47 AM
0

As has been stated above, feminists are far worse. They deny the very existence of male rape victims -- see Mary Koss.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:42 AM
-1

Your account is now deleted -- good call -- but I just want to say that you make me sick. I mean like you feminists literally make me want to vomit.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:41 AM
16

But...but...Judgy Bitch told me that right-wingers like Donald Trump and Sarah Palin support men's rights! Yeah, no.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:37 AM
7

You best check your male privilege. /s
/r/MensRights08/01/16 02:41 AM
2

That is your opinion honestly. [She says this about my comment that I've been drunk and had sex -- and was apparently "raped"] As far as the laws, those might have been on the books, but what are the odds of being arrested? Here's something to recognize sweetheart. There is a much larger gender gap than racial gap in terms of policing, arrest, charge, and sentencing. When it comes to the sentencing gap, females can rape and torture little boys and be given a slap on the wrist. WTF is that? Males…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:29 AM
3

You do know that "insanity" -- like, not being able to distinguish between fantasy and reality -- is a legitimate legal defence? Before the insanity defence insane people were treated worse than animals.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:15 AM
0

"I became uncomfortable." Welcome to the real world, where facts don't always correspond with your pet ideology. Which is clearly feminism, in your case.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:02 AM
0

That said, this experience has done nothing to win me over to your camp, so if that was your aim, you should rethink your approach. Soooo....posting factual rebuttals doesn't win you over. What else am I supposed to do? Write a romance novel? I was very polite in the initial exchanges, and even agreed with you that labels are often off-putting. Do you or do you not have any objections to feminists opposing men's rights? Eg denying support to male victims of rape and domestic violence, and active…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:34 AM
7

Hey Karen, Much love. Two requests: You should make a video expanding your written comment on the Leo DiCaprio thread. "Feminism hurts women too" but from a different perspective than Allison's "lack of female agency" argument. You should do an AMA on R/mensrights. Yes you post here occasionally (always welcome), and yes your time is better spent arguing with feminists in front of a large audience, but I think the men and women here would appreciate some one on one time (that's not what I meant …
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:15 AM
1

I suppose that being said, I'll bow out respectfully, because quite obviously this isn't the forum for me, and I don't want to waste your time any further trying to sell me on something that I'm already overwhelmingly though by no means prejudicially unimpressed by. I gave you hard data on feminists opposing men's rights. You decide to "bow out". Are you sure you're not a feminist? Both sides just sound like axe grinding and injustice porn to me than an actual movement worthy of my consideration…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:02 AM
4

I agree. In fact that was my point. In fact I would take it a step further: in our culture, rape is basically viewed as the worst crime possible, second only to terrorism, to the point where we are contemplating reversing due process rights. Rape is decidedly not the worst crime possible. For example, prolonged torture of children is worse, yet we often let off female perps of child torture/abuse with a slap on the wrist. There was a case recently in Norway where a female cult leader [NSFL] kept…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:57 PM
1

Surely you can see that complaining that the MR movement is misunderstood and badly mischaracterized while also badly mischaracterizing the whole FR movement by the actions of the worst is somewhat suspect. Ah, but there are two fundamental differences: power and ideology. Feminists have power and ideology. MRA's have no power and no ideology. Some "Masculinists" like the folks at Return of Kings have ideology, but they are the male equivalent of feminists, not MRA's. The equivalent to MRA's are…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:32 PM
5

Maybe I have a soft spot for the little ones but I think every few days in one country alone is reason for concern. I mean we are talking about killing babies. I'm also not convinced that rape is anywhere near as common as feminists pretend to believe. Edit: arguably the more serious issue, at least from a societal-effect perspective, is abusing children, a practice at which females excel. Why no posters?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:21 PM
8

Yes it has happened -- but not via official legal channels. Super-wealthy or super-well-connected men can get away with raping kids. See eg the Jimmy Saville coverup or the Franklin Affair in the US. The difference is that when a (very, very powerful) man molests multiple kids it needs to be covered up (If he's middle or lower class or even not a member of the elite -- forget about it). If a woman molests dozens of boys, she can be a Wall Mart employee and still walk away with a slap on the wris…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:17 PM
4

If these people are "Marxist" I'd like to know when I get to own and control the means of production. Hell, just subjecting bankers and corporate "persons"* to the same laws as the rest of us would be a good start. *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:11 PM
14

As much as I appreciate the sentiment of the young lass, I can't help but be slightly annoyed by the title. When men are "brave" it looks like this: http://www.nationalinfantrymuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/381d402fb171b4a1e9e74b7bfac4cf5b.jpg
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:08 PM
7

This is one of the reasons I'm an anarchist. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CX2ZhezUoAAWXtV.jpg:large
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:03 PM
1

I don't like labels, because they carry baggage. If I say I'm a feminist, you immediately think of some of the worst rhetoric the most extreme variants put out, and are ready to hear that come from my mouth. Just like if I say I'm an MRA, the same thing happens. Fair enough. I myself don't go around calling myself an MRA, but I do say that I support men's rights (and women's rights), and I acknowledge that the feminist movement has made a number of egregious errors. The most obvious example is t…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:59 PM
4

Ehm, I don't want to come across as an MRA I don't see what the big deal is being a men's rights advocate. I'm a woman's rights advocate, why not be a men's rights advocate? And yes, there are numerous areas where men and boys suffer institutional discrimination. I think the reluctance to say "I support the men's rights movement" is based on a successful disinformation campaign by certain feminists, who are frightened at the idea that "patriarchy theory" may be, well, a bunch of bullshit, and th…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:33 PM
2

It is legitimately frightening that so many feminists think this way. If I was a woman I would frankly be insulted by the infantilization inherent to these arguments. Evidently we consider male children more competent than female adults.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:28 PM
5

The encyclopedia is feminist? That particular encyclopedia, yes, since it corresponds with feminist revisionist history and is flat out wrong. And your source cities some states (not all states), and also doesn't mention any arrests. Did you miss this part? "[Pleck] points out that punishments for wife-beaters could be severe: according to an 1882 Maryland statute, the culprit could receive forty lashes at the whipping post; in Delaware, the number was thirty. In New Mexico, fines ranging from $…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:06 PM
2

creepy fuckers who subverted it into just plain old misogyny Examples? Paul Elam has said some outrageous shit (mostly to draw attention to the movement, because it was previously being ignored), but he's just one guy.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:50 PM
3

Fair point.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:33 PM
4

That is true, but that doesn't change that women being raped. This isn't a one invalidates the other. Both are bad and both should be addressed. Then why did you only address male-on-female rape? In what world can anyone give consent while drunk? I see. So if a man and woman have sex while equally drunk, are they both rapists? Evidently I've been raped dozens of times. Not true. All States made wife beating illegal in 1920. It wasn't until 1970 that it was considered a violent crime, before that…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:16 PM
7

Women don't need to be "reminded" not to rape. People who rape other people do so precisely because they aren't supposed to, ie they got off on the power and subversion of social norms.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:09 PM
2

Nope. The percentages of "forced to penetrate" and forcibly penetrated are roughly equal, and if we take into account prison stats men are actually raped more often. The difference is that we care about female rape victims. So in a sense feminists are right that we live in a rape culture, they just got the gender wrong. Studies show that the majority of male rapists were raped by women as children. So if feminists were actually interested in stopping rape they would draw attention to female pedo…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:07 PM
6

Feminists don't handle "facts" and patriarchal "logic" well.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:02 PM
2

"toxic masculinity"? I can assure you that 99% of men do not regard this as a problem. Rather, we have problems like male genital mutilation, gynocentric education, lack of reproductive rights, lack of parental rights, criminal profiling, longer prison sentences, earlier deaths, less funding for male issues/health etc. by the state, and so on. Feminists do not solve problems for men. They create them.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:01 PM
2

Actual sexual assaults happen much, much more often. We don't actually know that. We know that x percentage are provably false and x percentage are decided to be real based on a jury trial, but the vast majority are in the "unknown" category.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:56 PM
2

I don't completely disagree with you, but rape accusations are not always taken very seriously and there's certainly no witch hunt from the authorities when you report a sexual assault. The majority of the people released under the Innocence Project were men falsely accused of rape. As for witch hunts, you might want to check out what's currently going on on college campuses. Men have been expelled and cast as rapists even when there was compelling evidence (texts, emails etc) indicating that th…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:54 PM
2

because they are the most vulnerable Are they really? Or do we just have more empathy toward females? I see stories on this sub every second day about women raping 11-year-old boys and being given a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:48 PM
3

Get outta here with that patriarchal logic. Laws should be based only on subjective feelings, not "evidence."
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:47 PM
4

Men are much more likely to be victims of violence than women. The difference is that we care about women, hence said brochures.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:44 PM
21

Are men to blame? Hmmm...let me guess. Yes? Feminists, and dare I say women in general, seem to be utterly allergic to responsibility. Here's a hint, ladies: if you declare war on the opposite sex, there may come a time when they fight back, or just walk away from the battlefield. The incredible thing is how long it's taken for men to start doing this en masse. I guess feminists thought they could just keep kicking the dog indefinitely.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:18 PM
5

learn how to respect others' boundaries, to put their own foot down firmly when uncomfortable, and how to express enthusiastic consent. It's a nice idea. The problem is when you try to bring the law into it (as you yourself have noted). Not even the woman who signed "yes means yes" into law has any idea what "enthusiastic consent" actually entails: But there is one person — possibly the only one on the record — who has answered my question. Asked how an accused person could prove consent was obt…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:09 PM
4

You speak the truth. Yes, it’s ironic. This law is pushed by feminists. Feminists are supposedly on the side of sexual liberalism, which includes (or used to include) an idea that government should stay out of the bedroom. But this law takes government into the bedroom as few laws have done since puritanical times. If one — coming from a puritanical perspective — wished to place restrictions on sexual activity, one could come up with a very similar law. https://drhurd.com/2014/10/13/49151/ But t…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:03 PM
12

Men are not the sole perpetrators in these types of cases, but it would be wrong to pretend that young men are not more prone to these actions than young women. Nope. Studies repeatedly show gender symmetry on coercive envelopment vs coercive penetration. You are just perpetuating toxic gender roles. Ironically this is what feminists pretend to oppose.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:53 PM
4

Men hold the power, and are more prone to applying pressure (unwitting or not), when we're talking about two people in a room together. That's a gross overgeneralization. Many women are dominant over their partners, many women abuse their partners, and women are certainly dominant over teenage boys. Additionally, given sexual assault hysteria and the power women have via the state, one could make the exact opposite argument. Note that in corporate America, it is men, not women, who are refusing …
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:51 PM
4

How do you feel about little boys growing up in such a toxic environment?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:42 PM
7

You need to check your privilege. Women aren't constantly being demonized in the media, whereas men are. I personally wouldn't give a shit if it weren't for the fact that little boys are being raised in such a toxic environment.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:41 PM
6

Everyone knows? Maybe everyone knows kidnapping and raping is wrong, but I know for a fact many men believe that if they are married, they can have sex with their wife and not have it be rape. To them, it is literally impossible to rape their wives. Now imagine how men feel. The idea that women could rape men AT ALL is only now being recognized, and still on a very limited basis. THAT is "rape culture." I also have known men, in college, that held the belief that a drunk woman was drunk because …
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:39 PM
2

I am against unilateral legal powers given to women (like drastically lowered standards of proof in rape accusation cases on campuses), because I don't think this problem can be solved through punitive or judicial means (and I think those powers are likely to be abused). That's good to hear. Unfortunately it's a minority view amongst feminists. http://www.thenation.com/article/how-feminists-and-liberals-enabled-modern-police-state/
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:29 PM
5

How about killing babies instead of dumping them? According to some experts, mothers who kill their children are not as rare as we’d like to think. While exact numbers of children killed by their mothers is hard to pinpoint, some estimate it happens every few days in this country, at least 100 times a year. http://blog.chron.com/momhouston/2011/04/moms-killing-their-children-more-common-than-you-think/
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:24 PM
3

I'm certain that a significant part don't see it as rape or don't see all rape as wrong. Not all, of course. You're fucking crazy mate. I can't believe your comment has 27 upvotes. Brigade much?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:22 PM
3

According to some experts, mothers who kill their children are not as rare as we’d like to think. While exact numbers of children killed by their mothers is hard to pinpoint, some estimate it happens every few days in this country, at least 100 times a year. http://blog.chron.com/momhouston/2011/04/moms-killing-their-children-more-common-than-you-think/
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:19 PM
8

Women abusing their children is extremely common. Killing their babies less so but I wouldn't call it extremely rare. Perhaps it's time for a campaign after all.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:18 PM
4

The "anti-feminist" stuff is based entirely on the fact that feminists are opposed to men having equal rights. Maybe not all of them, but the ones with power (eg NOW opposing shared parenting, Duluth model etc.). They also protest when we hold conferences to discuss issues affecting men and boys. Many of the posters here are ex-feminists. They were essentially driven out of the movement when they started bringing facts into the gender debate.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:17 PM
5

Even though women raping men isn't common, it still happens Actually forced envelopment is roughly as common as forced penetration. However feminists removed forced envelopment from the definition of rape (see Marry Koss).
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:08 PM
9

being intoxicated in public, for flirting with the guy, for being in the dorm room late at night, for being outside late at night, etc. How do you know she was raped? Was it proven in a court of law?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:08 PM
6

Rape is punished by beheading in Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:05 PM
-1

So men are children. Got it.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:01 PM
3

creating (relatively) unwitting rapists, and plenty of victims. They're not rapists. And their "victims" are not victims unless they communicate "no" and the person proceeds to rape the other person. Men are expected to escalate and they do. Women are expected to have enough sense to say "no" if they don't want something. My six year old niece is able to say "no" and so should adult women.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:58 PM
6

He even tried to justify it by saying that I hadn't said "no" clearly or enough times, and I had to point out to him that I had said "I don't feel comfortable with this" like 5 separate times. You said no. Therefore he was committing assault. "No means no." Feminists are trying to create "yes means yes" laws and overturn habeus corpus rights for men, effectively shifting the burden of proof onto men and overturning our entire legal system.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:54 PM
1

I think the problem is that rape isn't well defined for most people It used to be until feminists started changing the definition. Under yes means yes doctrine, people are constantly committing "rape" 24/7, even your own parents. Thank about that. Then decide if it's a good idea to let feminists control how we have sex. Camille Paglia — 'Leaving sex to the feminists is like letting your dog vacation at the taxidermist.'
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:50 PM
7

Considering that every college "rape" story the media hypes turns out to be a hoax, it is probably exceedingly rare. 91 percent of colleges reported zero incidents of rape in 2014. Canada has similar numbers. That's probably why feminists are trying to redefine rape to include regret sex, drunk sex etc. Gotta keep that victim narrative going. As for babies being thrown in dumpsters, the poster presents a deliberately provocative example of a very real problem: women killing and abusing their bab…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:47 PM
5

We're in R/All. Quite a few feminists posting here at present (male and female).
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:40 PM
10

Precisely. And due to the nature of society, when talking about physical intimacy, it is mostly men who hold the power and mostly men who don't realize that their persistence is actually harmful. Men have the power in sexual relationships? LMAO. Maybe if you're Leonardo DiCaprio.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:35 PM
11

So here we have an article by an anti MRA group, and Kimmel defines them as "MRA's". Yep, makes perfect sense. Wasn't this guy once hooked up with Sarah "I am a victim who got paid less because of my my vagina" Silverman? What a piece of shit is Kimmel. He always did strike me as slimy.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:46 AM
9

It makes perfect sense if you acknowledge the dishonesty of the opposition.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:39 AM
10

By "even" I meant even late night talk show hosts who have a large audience. Not that Kimmel is some sort of ethical reporter.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:47 AM
8

I was just told that Jimmy Kimmel even did a bit on this.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:46 PM
1

Anyone will be able to relate who plays games the amount of crap these journalists write about them, all they'd need to do is spend more than an hour playing to realise the majority of what they say about gamers and the games industry is bullshit. They already know this. Feminists are engaged in a sleazy disinformation campaign because they can't beat us on the arguments. If they had to debate us on issues like domestic violence, male genital mutilation, the boy crisis, male suicide, parenting r…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:24 PM
3

The libertarian Justin Raimondo made the same argument a few weeks into Trump's campaign. I think the situation has changed. Bernie would easily beat Trump, but Hillary? Everyone I know (Republican, Democrat or otherwise) despises the woman. I have lots of hard-left friends (as opposed to liberals) and they would sooner vote for Darth Vader than Hillary Clinton. The Washington establishment, including the DNC itself, is trying its best to undermine Bernie's campaign. From their point of view the…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:12 PM
10

My parents got divorced ten years ago and as the youngest child I was the focus of my mom's anger that she had towards my father. I used to read a website called "People you'll see in hell." It was full of these sorts of stories. The mother -- invariably given custody no matter how unfit -- would displace her rage onto her little boy, who "reminded" her of her ex. It's even worse when they have new kids with a new partner, who become her "favorites." Some of the stories involved abuse so extreme…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:00 PM
2

Shitpost.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 10:32 PM
2

Labelling someone "privileged" comes across as accusatory and is therefore a counter-productive way of addressing inequality. It's really as simple as that.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:33 AM
4

No it's real. No, it isn't. Maybe 20 years ago but not today. http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34667100/poor-white-boys-get-a-worse-start-in-life-says-equality-report This is what happens when you make everything about race and sex rather than class. You just create new disadvantaged groups.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:43 AM
1

But, while it’s easy to get laid if you’re a woman, women are hard wired to screen potential mates and select only high-quality ones, which leads many of them to be just as sexually frustrated as a man who can’t get any. This is absurd. If females only select "high-quality" men then why do thugs and psychopaths do so well with women? To me, a real "catch" would be a kind, intelligent and honourable man; but these qualities are evidently considered "meh" to the fairer sex. They are mere bonuses t…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter