| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismNot really - you're still equating outcome with opportunity. I assume you're familiar with studies such as this? http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/unofficial-prognosis/2012/09/23/study-shows-gender-bias-in-science-is-real-heres-why-it-matters/? There are quite a few of these for genders, but not nearly as much as for racial discrimination, sadly. Now, I realize that it's certainly my burden to present support for my view, but I do feel that your debate style seeks to antagonize rather than see… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/13 11:06 PM |
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismNavigating between de jure and de facto opportunity is tricky. Social habits and customs, as well as a host of cognitive biases, make it hard to say when opportunity is actually equal. Equality under the law isn't always enough, which is especially true if the law is applied discriminatory. See blacks on death row as a prime example. Getting no reply as "Samantha X", but being offered an interview as "Sam Y" still happens, although it's much more pronounced if you're using a non-white name. It's… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/13 08:02 AM |
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismI never called you indoctrinated, as I don't think you have been indoctrinated with any intent. Interestingly, you however said that I... spout the ideology which has apparently been spoon fed to you at your university. Now, what did you seek to accomplish by that statement? How did you see that turning out into anything constructive at all? Do statements like this foster an understanding or an interest in producing clarifications? You follow that up with: I think you're so used to your echo cha… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/13 06:37 AM |
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismI may well not have expressed myself well enough to reach you, but you make yet a other great leap of assumption and assume that is related to honesty. Really? You've tossed around assumptions and accusations of motives in every post you've made to me. Why? You don't ask me to explain myself differently, but just write off what I write as if I'm brainwashed due to my job. At my age, that starts to get kind of old. As a debate technique, if that's what it is, you achieve confrontation and ditch b… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/13 05:17 AM |
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismI think you're missing the fact that you didn't make your point - you made complaints and statements, but all you did was show that you think women are entitled to just have what men have to fight for... merely on the basis of being women. Yeah, I'm sadly not surprised that's all you got from what I wrote. It's unfortunate. I think you're so used to your echo chamber that you cannot handle having to prove your points. The sad thing is, I believe you actually see it that way. You read my posts as… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 11:18 PM |
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminism...which is? ... lost on you. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 12:47 PM |
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismNot all men are denied custody, not all women are denied leadership positions. But that's besides the point. You seem to think that we have equal opportunities and that the outcome differs based on capabilities and nothing else, I've attempted to point out that capabilities include your gender. If it didn't, it would be debated at all. Anyway, I've made the point I set out to make to third parties reading this thread. As I said, I never had any illusions of convincing you personally of anything,… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 07:38 AM |
| 2 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismNone of the men are attacked for bring men. That's the difference. If they argued policy or even personality, fine, but when the argument was purely the gender of the person, that's a very different matter. And yes, that is the case when it is presented as "can a woman lead the country". A woman. Not this woman. Any woman. The only thing that group shares is their gender. It's the same as a man being denied custody because he's a man. Not because of his suitability as a parent. When someone is s… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 06:14 AM |
| 1 | A message for us all, xposted from /r/feminismEqual opportunity exists? When was the last time it was debated in prime time if a male could run the country? I realize it's not something I'll change your mind about, but just like men don't get fair treatment in custody cases women don't have equal opportunities. Legally? Certainly. In reality? No. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/13 06:45 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter