TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

____Chris Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by ____Chris on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Again, will you please get your facts right. I did not saying anything nor did I make a claim of any kind. All I did was post something Frederick Douglas had said. For some reason, of the over 600 words in that quote you fixated on the word "progress". BTW, where are you getting the word "suffer"? Douglas did not use that word nor did I. He did use the word "struggle". Is this what you are referring to? You accuse me of not understanding something I posted, yet you are unable to even correctly r…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:10 PM
1

There is no doubt that the founding fathers were exceptional men in their time as were the principals upon which the the country was established. I would agree those principles had much to do with the world being brought out of the dark ages. Things began to deteriorate right after WWI, and by WWII the mold was cast. It has been a continual decline from that point. The metrics are many, but here are a few. Notwithstanding its founding principles, the US is the most religious country in the devel…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 12:15 AM
1

Take a real hard look at the metrics for your country and then compare them to the rest of the developed world. The US has become an outlier. American exceptionalism is an understatement.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:59 PM
1

Edit: Why am I not surprised. The US purports to be modern country an advanced democratic society and based on the rule of law, but the stupidity just keeps on coming.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:40 PM
1

I did not say anything, Frederick Douglas did, and he did not say "suffer". You said "suffer". Get your facts right. You are insisting on wanting a binary answer. That is not an argument. I refuse to enter into that conversation with you because you have demonstrated you are not a serious person who is genuinely interested in a serious discussion. You prefer your worm's eye view of the world. Any explanation I would provide would be unintelligible to you because you seem to lack the basic unders…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 07:31 PM
3

Why am I not surprised. The US purports to be a modern country, but the stupidity just keeps on coming.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:39 AM
1

It is your choice whether or not you are epistemically responsible. I was quite sincerely passing on a good reference who is the most quoted intellectual alive and is is very accessible. Instead, you are asking me to provide you with a simplistic explanation of something Frederick Douglas said over 100 years ago. I cannot help you to understand something you are not willing to understanding.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 11:20 PM
0

You sound like a person who takes the human rights you enjoy for granted. I assure you they did not fall from the sky. To answer your question would require copious amounts of history. This is something you really need to do on your own in order to understand what Frederick Douglas was talking about. The number of sources are huge and too many to even begin to cite. But, there is a very accessible global public intellectual who is all over the internet. He speaks plainly and backs up everything …
/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:42 PM
0

I see no reason to believe that we must suffer to right wrongs. Of course you see no reason. Others will do that for you.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 08:56 PM
2

Agreed. BTW, I like the boy's hair. I see nothing wrong with it. It's clean and natural with beautiful colour. He says he plans to cut it once it is long enough to donate to the charity, which apparently he has done in the past.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:40 AM
4

ah ha! All the more reason this boy should stand his ground.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:35 AM
1

If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lighting. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what peopl…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:32 AM
-1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:59 AM
2

I guess the question is how one should deal with double-standards that are based on the traditional stereotyping of the sexes. If this in fact a private school that receives no public funding, as a parent I would move my son to another school. If the school receives public funding, I would strive to ensure the school does remove said discrimination. How should one do that is the question I think you are referring to.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:58 AM
2

As to whether or not it is equally enforced in todays world who can say. This is precisely what a number of posters are commenting on. They are basically saying that if the sexes were reversed here, the matter would be treated differently.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:51 AM
12

If it is a private school with a strict dress code it is to create >uniformity among the students so that they both see and treat >each other as equals. It is not clear that this school is private, but it is common for private schools to receive some public funding. Notwithstanding, private corporation are at their liberty to establish certain rules regarding their employees. However, even private corporations are restrained from doing whatever they like in our society. They are regulated either…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:43 AM
1

I do not understand what you mean. Not really what? That it is not obvious?
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:01 AM
10

I think the point a number of posters are making here is that if a girl in the same school had her hair cut in a brush cut style it is hard to imagine she would be single out as this boy has been. Why? Many here correctly believe that our culture is more concerned with discrimination against females than males. How did this happen? Firstly, feminism has been advocating for equality for females for many decades and historically their positions were valid. Second, having got all that was due them,…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:56 PM
3

Is it not obvious that mwobuddy's point is that feminism's idea of gender equality is gynocentric in practice whilst politically purporting to stand for universal equality. Example: Mainstream feminist organizations have a long standing record of opposing shared parenting after divorce. Guess which status quo they are trying to maintain.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:21 PM
-8

It is not a little early. Think of it this way; can you imagine a girl being sent home for having a brush cut? Would it even happen?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:12 PM
11

why be so cynical? Because his statement is true. The evidence of a cultural bias regarding sexism has been hiding out in the open for decades. I guess the bias is not an issue for you, or perhaps the evidence has eluded you. Either way, the observation is valid.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:05 PM
2

I am unclear as to how you are defining 'social violence' because you give a number of situational example, but also include threatening with a knife. Here is my response anyways. I most fear the agency that women have at getting others to attack a man. I think most people would initially think of the traditional scene of a man coming to the defense of the so-called weak and helpless sex. This in my view is still very prevalent in our society and, for example, it is why the claim of "rape cultur…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:16 AM
0

Hey bro I understand your frustration and fully support you in pointing out pseudo mras. In order to keep ones sanity, I learned a long time ago that every movement, group, culture, society, etc etc. has it's none serious people. The two themes that typically define these people are either selfishness or ignorance. Often it is both. It is possible to overcome one's ignorance and selfishness, but only open minded people who truly seek understanding and who regularly question/test their own belief…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:15 AM
2

You're welcome, and I am glad you found it of some use.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:06 AM
1

Very true. In fact, the level of maturity among faculty is even worse in grade school. The over whelming majority of teachers are female in the elementary grades. Since we are on the subject of maturity, I am going to assert something I have been conscious of for many years. I believe adult immaturity, both emotional and intellectual, is a significant problem in society for both sexes. The incoherent nonsense and flawed/biased reasoning that passes for feminist scholarship is an example of how l…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:59 AM
1

Very insightful and accurate. Yeah, many seem to grow out of it because the so-called feminist scholars that push this patriarchy nonsense only have the immature female as an audience. Once a woman enters adulthood things change, but as you likely know some never enter adulthood and the so-called scholars, well this is how they earn a living so no hope of change there.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 06:47 AM
2

It seems you are on the right track. I do not have any difficulty with what you specifically have said. However, I do not think many MRA's who truly believe in real equality will like being equated to 2nd wave feminism. Here is why: Even though the feminism of say the 60's was egalitarian compare to the inegalitarian feminism of patriarchy theory, feminism has never seriously examined female sexism and how it effects society overall and men in particular. Secondly, feminism across the board has …
/r/MensRights28/11/14 06:22 AM
4

Well that's great BUT where or what is "KSUM"? AND what is the MSP Conference?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:56 AM
1

Yep, while Rome is burning you're selling hats. God bless amurica!
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:04 PM
1

Which half are you referring to? The torturing GOP or the assassinating Dems? Or, is it the half that do not vote, or the half you do? That so-called small fringe is destroying your country.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:55 AM
1

Yeah I am learning your politcs. Citizens United, NDAA (habeas corpus anyone?), perpetual war, extrajudicial assassinations, political prisoners, customers walking around Target stores with loaded rifles, secret prisons, torture, etc. etc. Yep, great frick'n democracy. The question is can Americans get their democracy back. I sure hopes so.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 12:50 PM
2

Karen's take on this is dead on as usual.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:01 AM
1

You will support "any party"? The US only has two parties. If I were an american citizen, I would have been voting independent years ago. The GPO and Democrats' actual policies are not all that different. The marketing on the other hand . ... well, that's where the lying and manipulation is different. Let's face it, democracy in the US is broken. It's gone!
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:33 AM
1

OMG, I am done. I leave you with this one question. They say they did not publish because they had no evidence other than what the women told them. They then say after Ghomeshi FaceBook post they decided to publish. What changed regarding their lack of evidence? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Advice: Learn how to think instead of relying on your favorite authority telling what to think.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:59 AM
1

In addition to their initial article, they publish a second the same day explaining why they chose to publish the initial article. Go read it because you do not understand why they reported this story now instead of months ago. They admit they had no evidence whatsoever. When Ghomeshi posted his open letter on his FaceBook, the TS saw that as corroborating evidence. It is, but not nearly enough to for them to publish IMHO. Very irresponsible journalism. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/10/26…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:38 AM
1

Poetic irony indeed. Good point! This is why I am more concerned by how the CBC and particularly the Toronto Star has dealt with this entire matte to date. I do not like Ghomshi's politics, but how he is being treated by the press is instructive, not mention unfair. People should be concerned with the double standards and hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:51 AM
1

A major newspaper = reputable. Just what I thought you would say. As for evidence, you do not require evidence. Remember? The Toronto Star does not meet my standards for responsible journalism. The article in question is self evident in this regard. It is obvious that their agenda is to slowly roll out article after article in this saga with a little more info. each time to bait continued readership. I trust you do understand that this newspaper is in the advertising business, which is their sol…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:39 AM
1

If you are a serious person you should require the same amount of evidence a court does to believe someone is guilty. But I get it, you are not the one being accused here. How selfish of you. May you one day be subject to the same sloppy thinking you have demonstrated here.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:16 AM
1

Your reply still does not explain on what basis you believe the newspaper in question is reputable.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:04 PM
1

Thank you for admitting that your belief is based on an inclination not evidence. This you refer to as normal, which I assume you mean common. "One, judges don't decide guilt - juries do." Wrong! Not having an "obligation" should not deter you from basing your belief on evidence and sound reasoning. You obviously base your belief on something else.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:56 PM
-1

Which is precisely why the Toronto Star's article is irresponsible journalism, or should I say gossip. Pathetic! You would think they would find more important matters to report on that are truly in the public interest. Like why the CBC has been sitting on evidence for almost a year from Edward Snowden about the Canadian Government's mass surveillance of Canadians, which is illegal. Wake up people, like all corporate media in this age, the Toronto Star is in the advertising business. Their reade…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:14 PM
1

Reputable you say. Where is the evidence from this reputable newspaper?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:04 PM
1

You are jumping to conclusions. Here's a thought. If you were accused of a crime you did not commit. Would you want the judge to base his/her decision on evidence and rational reasoning, or instead use your analysis to pass judgement on you? ? ? ?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:00 PM
-1

Of course you see a pattern. The accusers are anonymous. They provide no evidence other then their unsupported allegations. They claim they did not file a complaint with police because they are concerned about their reputations. The Star report cites an eg. of harassment of a girl named Carla, but Carla is a flake who incriminates herself. I am going to wait for more evidence other than Jian has a sex life that is hardly unusual. I suggest you do the same before passing judgment.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:43 PM
1

Canadian journalist and author, Patricia Pearson, wrote a book in the late 90's on this very topic; "When She Was Bad: Violent Women and the Myth of Innocence". Not only does she debunk a few myths, the book exposes our cultural blind spot to female violence. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/492779.When_She_Was_Bad
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:49 PM
1

Notice I did not say that I agreed with a list of false accusers. I think such a list would be ridiculous not because it would deter reporting a crime, but for the same reason I think all gender specific laws are ridiculous. The law is supposed to be blind. This is the fundamental premise of the "rule of law". I continue to be amazed by how few people seem to understand the concept. When the justice system is not functioning according to the rule of law, writing BAD law is not the solution. IMO,…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:23 PM
6

This is a nonstarter. Modern society is too concern with the ALLEGED female victim being deterred from reporting. Stop coddling women. They are adults. It is difficult for many people to report a crime. However, if they want justice they will pursue the matter.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 12:39 AM
3

I agree. If the justice system is functioning correctly, while respecting basic human rights, the public will be protected to the extent possible in a liberal democracy.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 12:30 AM
1

You sound like a critical thinker and are definitely asking all the right questions. An old adage that says wisdom begins at the end is not an absolute. One can gain much insight at an earlier age. For serious people this is a life long endeavor where one repeatedly accesses their own beliefs. I think you'll be ok.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 12:13 AM
1

" It leads me to wonder if there are just as many females that engage in sexual assaults as males." This is very difficult to determine from the press because the press is notoriously bad at providing much insightful information on ANY topic other than some basic fact in a particular situation. Even then they leave big holes in the story. Do not depend on any corporate media for your edification.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:03 AM
2

@ errythangthizzin Evidently you are more interested in correcting flawed thinking rather than defending the notion of infallibility. Exactly what Socrates told his students 2400 years ago. ; )
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:31 AM
2

It sounds like your new friend is highly indoctrinated in a particular belief system. I do not mean to say this is something unique to feminism. For example, consider the millions that believe global warming is not real, but a sinister plot for various reasons. Another example would be the unquestionable belief in god. People that are dedicated to their beliefs are closed minded and typically have a vested interest in holding said beliefs. Either their belief supports their prejudices and/or the…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter