~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | If You Can’t Feed Em Don’t Breed Em!They will also need to afford day care while they work which is very expensive. It doesn't matter if it's an outlier, it's a problem and needs discussion | /r/MensRights | 08/07/20 02:49 PM |
| 2 | If You Can’t Feed Em Don’t Breed Em!I completely agree | /r/MensRights | 08/07/20 02:39 PM |
| 0 | If You Can’t Feed Em Don’t Breed Em!Just dump the kids in a care home so the state can look after them instead of a parent who loves them but is unable to afford the costs of day care after being a stay at home parent? | /r/MensRights | 08/07/20 02:39 PM |
| 8 | If You Can’t Feed Em Don’t Breed Em!You can't always prove abuse either way. It's difficult unless there are physical marks or written messages, but abuse can still happen without this. But what if there is no abuse and the wife just decided to walk out and leave the dad and 2 young kids. What would he do? | /r/MensRights | 08/07/20 10:54 AM |
| 12 | If You Can’t Feed Em Don’t Breed Em!Imagine you are a dad who looks after 2 young children and your wife is the breadwinner who earns the money for the family. Imagine one day she becomes abusive, she attacks you, or she packs up and leaves you and the kids. Now you are a single father with two young children. Would it be better these children live in poverty and go hungry when you can't simultaneously look after them and work, or be given up to a foster home (which is paid for by the state anyway), or be subsidised with money to … | /r/MensRights | 08/07/20 10:39 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter