TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_corpus_callosum Archive

View 0 posts and 131 comments by _corpus_callosum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

By stats, definitely the latter is more rare. An IQ of 132 automatically places someone in the top 2%. And yeah, I wouldn’t be okay with a partner shorter than me. But I don’t demand that he’s super tall; 5’7” would actually be okay. (I’m 5’5”.)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 07:42 PM
2

I have been told that even with just one standard I’m the most picky xD
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:44 PM
1

Yeah, but being able to build almost anything is more maintenance and repetition as opposed to actually designing it and making the plan. But I get you now
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:43 PM
1

The architect who does all the math and design is what I would want. The man who builds the bridge how he’s told to is not and sounds like your #5.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:20 PM
0

No, that IS a good form of intelligence. But your #5 doesn’t necessarily come with that. Plenty of people are good with their hands but aren’t intelligent. Instead of being the inventor or designer, they’re just maintenance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:18 PM
0

Yeah, I could create my own, but found it pointless. It was more amusing that the top thing I wanted wasn’t on a list of so many things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:17 PM
0

An aircraft engineer has what I’m demanding and would also agree that just being hands-on didn’t get him there.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:14 PM
1

No, 5 doesn’t cover that. Some people solve problems in their head without having to use their hands. Some people are more manual learners, like in 5. I prefer the former. Being good with his hands alone isn’t going to help him solve intelligent problems like the Riemann hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:12 PM
1

Surprised other users didn’t comment on this accusing you of being a second account of me lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:06 PM
0

You know what’s hilarious? The number one thing I would look for isn’t even on that list. It’s intelligence, curiosity, problem-solving capability, ability to have an above-average conversation and talk about things that actually matter. Even the next things I would want aren’t even on the list. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 01:02 PM
3

We don’t live in a socially fair one. As long as we place emphasis on society, we have to prioritize, and that means that it will always be unfair. That’s a latent manifestation of society. The consequence is what many call “social eugenics.”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 12:38 AM
2

You can always find out more about the job, just like you can always find out more about a person. Nobody expects you to know someone like you know your mom when you first meet. The key is to know the job (or person) BEFORE expressing interest. For example, you can talk to people who work for that company or have that job. (With a person, have mutual interests or friends.) This is why it’s smart to go for someone you’re in a class with or frequently around - someone you know - as opposed to jump…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 11:39 PM
3

Obviously you should know more about the job when you apply. And that’s exactly where the correlation is and this analogy works: men should know more about a woman before they approach. See the point? 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 11:13 PM
4

That would depend on how much you want the job. Some jobs are prestigious and worth that effort. Also depends on how qualified you are for the job. If you’re a high school dropout applying for a job as a radiologist yeah good luck If you’re applying to jobs you’re qualified for but you keep running into the same problem and after the interview phase they pick other candidates then obviously you need to introspect and improve something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 11:09 PM
1

George Clooney is literally the only one that gets better with age. I say he’s finer now than he was then, but I’m pretty sure arguing opinions is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 10:59 AM
23

Unfortunately, the “all or nothing” mindset is probably the most accurate here, so I don’t criticize you for that. However, all is at least something and if you give nothing you can expect nothing in return. This goes for both men and women. You can’t go into a new potential relationship first date thinking, “I’ve been hurt so much in the past so I’m not even gonna try.” You’re stuck in a cycle of getting what you give and you’ll never be satisfied. Can a woman you have a first date with blame y…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 02:49 AM
1

I think the contrary: they knows it’s TOO incredibly easy and that men have low standards, so they flip it and make it where men have to be worth their effort. And that one doesn’t happen as often.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 02:46 AM
2

This is probably the simplest explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 07:36 PM
1

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 07:33 PM
2

I wish things were that black and white. But no, the other user is right; many more variables come into play that are to be accounted for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 07:30 PM
9

This explains why ugly guys who try to be shitty don’t succeed. Shitty guys who succeed in the successful market have possession of other variables that attract women to them. Without those variables your efforts are mostly pointless, as can be seen in society. You’re looking at it as if being shitty is the variable at play. You have a lot to learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 07:18 PM
2

The problem with this view is that you leave out the variables that make those men desirable to women. This indicates that 1. Female high standards are existent; you just don’t know what they are and therefore have the wrong idea of “value.” 2. You don’t know much about reality. The solution would be to discover those variables you’re missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 07:17 PM
1

At least now you recognize that economics can be used and there is not just one model in economics 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 06:49 PM
2

Which is why the standard normal distribution model that is usually applied does not work and we have to change the mathematical model to represent the scenario correctly. If you think I’m red pill then congrats on being the first Redditor to offend me. And I don’t mean that sarcastically; RP is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 06:47 PM
2

No. The flaw was the model. Read the previous paragraph. You speak of value as 1-10 scale, and with this the value is related to the other samples in that market, so it’s more like a standard normal distribution with 5 being the average. This model was the flaw. Are you aware that supplies and demands can follow different mathematical models? Have you ever taken an economics course? Or a reading one, for that matter lol (no offense)?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 06:38 PM
1

Like I said, you either skipped over a lot or didn’t comprehend it. Read the sentence immediately before that. It says The flaw in that is what you point out at the end. In other words, you were right in pointing out the flaw with that model. Then I go on to explain how the models of economics do work for this and where the previously mentioned model was, as you already pointed out, wrong. I even say that this can be modeled in the same way as economics with the knowledge of stats and mathematic…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 06:30 PM
3

That’s not what I said. You clearly either didn’t understand it or just ignored more than half of it. In my post I literally said it can be viewed the same way economics is. I’m actually thinking you don’t know much about stats or economics lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 06:04 PM
3

You did in the beginning part of your post. No one is ignoring supply and demand. I just explained it for you. If your point is just that they’re calculating it the wrong way, I agree. If you’re trying to say it can’t be modeled in the way economics is, I disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 05:54 PM
2

I haven’t removed anything lmao The other user did, though xD I’d call this a confidence boost if I cared anything about what people say on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 05:52 PM
4

There are many problems, or “loopholes” in this interpretation, but I’ll mention the most obvious one. You speak of value as 1-10 scale, and with this the value is related to the other samples in that market, so it’s more like a standard normal distribution with 5 being the average. The flaw in that is what you point out at the end: it doesn’t follow with the supply-and-demand of the market. This is how it becomes subjective because now we’re changing value to mean based on demand, not based on …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 05:46 PM
0

It wasn’t just for negging; he was harassing me and one time even tried to get too physical. And yeah, another user commented and apparently thinks I don’t know the law. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 05:01 PM
1

It was tested, actually, but not in this particular situation. I used it before. I’m a scientist; I know how to make something damaging but not illegal. The concentration of bleach to pepper spray is what made it not illegal or deadly. Again, you might benefit from a biochem class. I didn’t say all he did was neg. He negged, but he persisted and stalked after that. But that’s another story.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 04:59 PM
1

Honorable? Lmao no I think I protected myself well.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 04:36 PM
1

It’s neither deadly nor illegal. Technically he harassed me, and for that I could have had him arrested. He got off the hook with an eye surgery later on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 04:34 PM
3

This. EXACTLY. 👏 This is the whole gist of red pill men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 04:21 PM
1

Drink in the face is lucky. Last time a guy negged me I gave him a face of pepper spray and bleach. (I mixed the two.) He had vision problems for the next two years lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 03:37 PM
1

LOL I love your defensiveness! Do you think the same of men who go MGTOW? Because while it’s practically the same, the difference is I’m not a complaining baby about it like MGTOW guys. Tell that to the average men who ask me out frequently. I don’t claim to be a gem at all; looks-wise I’m average. (5’5” height, about 120 lb. and hike a lot, outgoing/love to travel) and career-wise I’m definitely above average, as I make probably at least 4 times what you do. I won’t lie; I’m touched by how defe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:59 PM
1

Don’t want marriage. If I decide to have children I’ll adopt. A man would DECREASE my quality of life, not increase it. Read my other comments on why because I’m not typing it again. Lol Every guy seems to ask me this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:54 PM
0

I would agree. But that doesn’t mean the average man would make my life better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 09:51 PM
1

Yes. And not old lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:30 AM
1

No because if they’re born into it then they didn’t earn it and it’s nepotism. I’m against nepotism. What I find desirable would be a man who is responsible and knows how to acquire wealth before he’s old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:24 AM
1

To answer your question, think of my scenario if I had decided to date. Chances are that I wouldn’t make what I make, wouldn’t have the education and opportunities I do, and would have kids with a chance that the man is no longer present. So the choice is Date a man for a time, be bored (if he’s average), risk having kids, risk him leaving, surrender education, income, and a good life. There will be arguments at some point, situations that aren’t desirable, etc. Don’t date a man, have a good lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 10:56 AM
1

Given that everyone should be treating everyone with respect, I don’t see how that would increase it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 10:31 AM
1

It’s unlikely that he would make more than I do, but either way, I don’t share finances. I’m responsible for myself, not for a grown man. Same for him. Supposing he makes an average salary, I make much more than that. So he shouldn’t be forced to contribute to my more expensive lifestyle. That’s for me to pay for, not him. Likewise, his endeavors are paid with his money.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 05:20 PM
1

I think a mix is preferable because some things really do need to be similar while other things where people are different can be desirable, even hot. Also, too much difference in certain areas can cause friction while too many similarities in certain areas can lead to boredom. In my case, I would definitely require the guy to be intelligent because if he’s not I will be bored. I’m also really interested in other cultures and find American culture bland, and I love Asian, Middle Eastern, and Lat…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 02:21 PM
1

You’ve gotten so defensive you haven’t even answered the question lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 01:51 PM
2

Definitely not the most intellectual conversations a person can have… but I’m seeing as this wasn’t your intended line of convo lol Yes, I design my own experiments; that’s part of why I make what I do. To answer your question, hmm… I have a vibrating dildo and am sexually stimulated by men. But I just don’t find the pros worth the cons, you know? Like the negatives outweigh the positives
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 11:19 PM
1

I’m not saying the male parent isn’t essential. There are so many problems with single-parent children it’s not even dismissible. I’m just saying it’s an option for someone who wants a family but no partner. Although I would argue that they might not be antisocial; maybe they just don’t want a man. But I get your point. P.S. Maybe you should talk to those guys who find it funny to impregnate someone then leave. They could benefit from your perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 11:15 PM
2

Lmao okay 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 11:08 PM
1

I like Reddit because I find a lot of the conversations intellectual. Same with Quora. So I don’t consider it a waste of time. It’s just something I do when im not busy at the moment. I learn from people’s views so it’s not a waste of time to me. This is one of the most controversial and philosophical subreddits; therefore it’s the one I spend probably the most time on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 11:06 PM
2

Most people being good partners doesn’t mean a relationship is better than being single. You claim I’m wrong but you dont prove it. 🤔 You ruled out companionship because of whatever bias you have. Now we’re getting somewhere. You’re starting to see that you’re arguing an opinion, I’m arguing an opinion, and yet you’re trying to say I’m wrong. See the problem with this? No, it’s not a valid answer, and whether I like it or not doesn’t matter. Whether a fact is liked or not doesn’t affect that it’…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 10:57 PM
2

Wasn’t wrong. Unless, of course, you can back up what you’re saying instead of talking in circles. Something women get - okay. But it’s not better than being single. Taking us back to square 2. No, you haven’t told me what the average man has to offer that’s better than being single. As far as companionship, dogs and friends are better. So that’s not something that men uniquely offer in a relationship. So we’re still on the question I asked: What unique thing does the average man contribute to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:54 PM
2

Clearly you ignored the sentence after that. Let me point it out. Companionship isn’t an answer when being single is more beneficial. Also, women offer companionship. That’s not unique to men. So you tell me that the average man has something to offer, can’t tell me what it is, then you ask what the average woman offers and you answer your own question. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:37 PM
2

If we’re referring to the men who are already in LTRs that you just mentioned then obviously the women are providing them something they wanted or they wouldn’t stay. Let me point out again that you haven’t told me what a man can offer. Companionship isn’t an answer when being single is more beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:33 PM
–

They don’t need BPD. They’re abusive in similar unempathetic ways is what I mean. You don’t have to talk about it to project. If I’m constantly looking for something in people, I’m more likely to get people with that trait because I notice it. Same here. Like I said, this is just like when girls who were molested say all men are bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:31 PM
0

And most average men don’t want LTRs. Most would prefer sex. But even just with that one characteristic of all women, that’s something men want. I can’t name you anything a man can give me that I would prefer over being single. And you haven’t mentioned anything, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:29 PM
–

Most women - no, people in general - aren’t like your mother. Unfortunately the juvenile justice system is fucked. I’m sure your teachers wanted to help, but there’s really nothing they can do. At least in the US, the parent has full responsibility for the child, and if you have a bad or abusive parent the system doesn’t give a fuck about you. That’s not the fault of your teachers or other people; they literally have steps they have to take formally. As for the dating, it seems like you expect w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:21 PM
1

I didn’t realize that by “average” you meant average income, not desirability. Sure, if we’re just talking money… I mean lmao Most men aren’t going after women for money, though. So what does the average woman offer? A pussy. Exactly what men want and complain when they can’t get.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:09 PM
1

I guess I’m far above average then. I make almost $400k a year and I’m not even 30 yet. Bringing in a man who makes $50k a year is bringing in problems that aren’t worth the 5-figure extra. Also, if the women lives on $40k and he lives on $50k, he’s not really increasing her standard of living because now you’re providing for two people and not one. And that definitely diminishes if they have kids. Without a man, there is no risk of having kids and him leaving. Not worth $50k a year sorry lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:03 PM
0

Didn’t intend to doge your question. Yes, she is, and I think it was dumb of her to ask him, especially considering how insecure he was, but that’s her. Who said that he didn’t talk to anyone else? No one said this, but given his reaction of insecurity after her rejection, there was clearly interest. It’s like… If person A is lactose intolerant and I say he can’t have a glass of milk he won’t seek vengeance on me for it later when I give him something else. Probably won’t think anything of it. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 09:00 PM
0

That doesn’t explain why he chose to talk to her and no other female in the room. I’m not being weird; you’re trying to dodge the point. Haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:51 PM
6

Actually, yes, that’s what women are starting to choose. It’s still not a majority but I wouldn’t be surprised if it becomes one. More women are not wanting those things, and I’m a good example and I’m not even 30 yet. The difference in these women and MGTOW is that we don’t go around complaining about it and taking our own lives. And no, you don’t need a man to have a family. It’s called an artificial fertilization or adoption.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:49 PM
1

Both are cringe to me. But Age and N-count are two different things. You can’t make them equal each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:47 PM
3

This. A difference lies in the fact that the woman with 400+ partners is being honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:46 PM
0

Let’s say I’m average then. How would my standard of living go up? I’m pretty sure men decrease it, not increase it. Please enlighten me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:29 PM
-1

Sounds like he singled her out, though, as opposed to getting to know everyone the same way. This demonstrates interest prior to him even knowing her. There’s a huge difference in him initiating this conversation with someone, say, whom he’s been in a class with for several months as opposed to a stranger. A better question would be this: Why did he want to get to know her? If it wasn’t interest, then what was it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:26 PM
6

… Yes and no. The red pill is a philosophy. So is blue pill, purple pill, etc. Do you know what philosophy is? It’s interpretation of science and data in attempt to prescribe application and meaning to it. Or, as most philosophers would say, “the search for truth.” So… while the red pill is not strict science, neither is any other pill. They’re all philosophies. When I think I’ve actually found some intellectuals on Reddit, it never fails to disappoint me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:23 PM
1

Of course. I also see that 1. there is a divide between women who will settle and women who won’t 2. you didn’t even answer the question
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:10 PM
3

Another user pretty much summed up my take: What does the average man have to offer?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 07:45 PM
1

This is basically what I was going to post, but you beat me to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 07:43 PM
2

I misworded that part. My mistake. Got confused with other user’s comment tbh, as I am working in the lab. Very focused on different things. Anyways… Still, he initiated with her, which shows interest. Whether he actually asked her out or was just making conversation doesn’t change the scenario. She wasn’t interested in him the way he seemed to be with her. The point is that he is showing this woman interest and he doesn’t even know her. He’s interested at least somewhat (and wouldn’t be hurt by…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 07:20 PM
5

I guess you just choose to ignore that women are more likely to choose to be single now while male suicide peaks? Lol And as the other user said, no, men don’t control the marriage market. Your comment is so cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 07:13 PM
1

He initiated with her. That shows his interest. You’re saying he didn’t even have a chance to have interest yet. Make up your mind. Is he interested or not? She can’t deny him if he didn’t show any interest in the first place. I disagree with b) and c), but your a) is on the right track. It’s common sense that you should know someone and be interested before asking them out. If you ask someone out right after just seeing them, that’s desperate af and they definitely should reject you. Lol I mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 01:50 PM
0

I doubt that. This is only one sign of insecurity. It’s not the ultimate test.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 01:44 PM
-6

If your interest fades after rejection, it shows two things: It wasn’t genuine interest. You’re insecure. I’d say the girl dodged a bullet. Same with the scenario turned around. If a man rejects a woman and she does this, she’s insecure af.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 03:21 AM
2

I would agree that expecting anything based on the grounds of their gender identity is sexist. Yes. But what you label as chivalry from a man - I don’t think women expect this from him because he’s a man. I hold doors for people because it’s just the decent thing to do, and I’m a woman. No one who comes through the door thinks anything of me being a woman or gives me a weird look or anything. It’s just decency. When it comes to holding car doors open, we aren’t riding in horses and carriages, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 03:18 AM
1

Right? Amidst reading his other comments I thought, “This sounds like a miserable old man.” Here he admits it. Lol 30 years of dating and nothing to show for it, and he doesn’t even notice that he’s probably the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 01:57 AM
2

I think the same of men. Video gaming isn’t productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 01:48 AM
2

This is the whole point of why women are saying that they do more. Most men don’t pay all the bills and if he had to he would complain.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 01:34 AM
2

If you consider not even 10% to be “a lot” then okay lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 01:41 PM
1

I’m not insulted, but nice try. And you say I’m wrong but can’t prove me wrong. That’s pointless and goes nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 01:40 PM
1

Idk what planet you live on but alright 😂😂😂😂Unicorns exist too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 01:39 PM
1

That still doesn’t do much for men, as the complaining and everything suggest, but okay 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:27 AM
1

It’s not a problem for me because I don’t date, but it’s definitely something other women wish men would change, and it would probably benefit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:21 AM
1

It doesn’t change the truth of what I said. If you can’t apply stats, that’s your inability not mine. Also applies to IRL; I used the OLD example because more numerical data is available. It’s HILARIOUS that you’ve resorted to trying to insult me since you can’t counter my point. That’s an automatic sign of being wrong. Lol On top of the fact that men ask me out. For argument’s sake, let’s say men hated me… I still don’t want them and prefer to be single, so that’s irrelevant. Your attempts to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:19 AM
2

It’s only true for the few whom it works and others who don’t want to shoot their shots IRL Agree 100%, but the numbers are growing and it’s actually a good statistical model. As most statisticians say, “all models are bad but some are useful.” It doesn’t change the truth of what I said. Actually, men ask me out. I turn them down. Simple dynamic but proves you very wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:01 AM
1

Nope because women mostly have this ability; men don’t. Choosing between 80% of what you want and choosing between 10% of what you don’t want… very different. It seems like you just want to live in a fantasy world where men actually hold the power. I think you see the truth of what I’m saying and just want to deny it. I get it lol If I had no power on something I wanted power in I’d be crying too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 09:54 AM
4

They can almost never choose the women they want, hence all the complaining they do. Most of the time she doesn’t like them back; that’s the problem. So no, it’s not the same for women because while some men won’t “fuck anything that moves,” as you say, the majority will. The only men who have power over women in this have the ability to choose the women they want. And as the OP and the answers indicate, that’s a very very small percentage of men. I can definitely see where living in a world in …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 09:51 AM
1

Of course. But the fact that they don’t have as much choice in getting what they want means they have less power 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 09:38 AM
2

They can’t choose the women they want, though. Have you not seen all the complaining men do about how women are so picky?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 09:37 AM
1

Because very rarely can they choose to say yes to what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 09:36 AM
7

Is that the best comeback you have? Lol Most of dating in the current generation is represented by online dating. Why do you think so many dating studies target those sites? And I didn’t say I use them. I don’t date at all. And your lack of knowledge but failed attempt to insult me with it is 1. Epically hilarious and 2. One reason I don’t find men worth pursuing. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 09:34 AM
4

I don’t have to worry about it because I don’t date. I’ve been asked out by men, but I choose to be single. So it’s more like they can’t be selected by me. I get a lot out of being on Reddit. It’s a great place to read intellectual conversations. If I didn’t get anything out of it I wouldn’t be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 01:26 AM
9

Women select the man though. Tell men on Tinder and Hinge that they have relationship power over women. They’ll either laugh at you or cry.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 10:34 PM
1

That’s exactly what an Omega who’s never had a biology class would say
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 10:25 PM
10

And that generally encompasses anything with two legs and a beating heart lmao For many men it can even be an AI object. Lol so doesn’t even have to be human
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 10:20 PM
2

You are right in that both parties can say no. But women hold more power because they’re more likely to get what they want. If men had this power this sub probably wouldn’t even exist and no men would be complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 10:18 PM
2

But most men don’t have the choice TO choose while women do. That’s the difference
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 10:16 PM
1

I live in Boston. Just because a majority agree on something doesn’t mean it’s right.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:46 PM
5

For a good man who’s responsible? Of course. Just like men are desperate for a woman who’s hot and wants to fuck only him In other words, men who are successful in their 20s are so much better than men it takes them half their life to get somewhere. But how many men do you know successful in their 20s who aren’t Chads? See the point? Most women will settle for the older guy because there’s no choice. Some won’t settle and choose the position I’ve taken. So these men aren’t high value; it’s just …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:45 PM
5

What’s your point here? I’m not saying what you see is wrong; I’m saying the explanation for it is those women are desperate for it and that an older man is not more valuable. And you don’t seem to be able to counter that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:33 PM
11

I don’t know what you’re trying to prove. I cannot speak for women who are that desperate for a man. I can only speak for myself. I’m not into older dudes. People can do what they want. That’s not my business or my issue. But you definitely can’t convince me that there is value in an old man who couldn’t be successful when he was younger. If that’s the point you want to make, you’re wasting your time. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:29 PM
6

False. As far as I know, he’s the ONLY exception. And no, I would not be into having him as a partner, husband, etc. He’s too old for my taste. As I mentioned earlier, the women who go for this do it because they have no other choice and men closer to their age aren’t successful. Some of us, on the other hand, aren’t so desperate. Cool. Generalization doesn’t get you anywhere. I’m not into old dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:24 PM
16

While I have no shame in saying George Clooney is fine af even now, two things hold: 1. He’s literally the only person I know of who gets better with age. He’s the one huge exception. 2. I still wouldn’t take him because he’s too old for me. So nothing changes; my view stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 08:12 PM
7

Nothing against that. I’m just saying I’m not into guys significantly outside my age range. I’m 26; if he’s older than, say, 29, I won’t even look at him twice. It’s always been a 2-3 year gap tolerance or a no-go. I’m not into old men who couldn’t be successful when they were younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 08:09 PM
0

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 08:07 PM
8

The morality argument is bogus for sure. But the user has a point that nature doesn’t cover everything so you can’t blame nature. Nature wants women to be selective and men hate that. That’s just one example.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:55 PM
42

I admit that I didn’t read most of this because it’s repeated a lot. If it takes a man half his life to become worthwhile, I don’t find that desirable. Other women do out of desperation, sure, but no, it shouldn’t take you 20 years to become desirable. Lol To me that’s actually pretty sad, not to mention that I’m not into old people:
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:52 PM
3

I caught this too. OP sounds like he has a very narrow pov and doesn’t want to see the entire situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:43 AM
3

Admittedly an AI man would be better than a real one, but I’m heterosexual not objectumsexual, so I still prefer single life over either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:31 AM
0

It’s so funny to me that you think having a partner will solve these issues, given that a partner is going to age just like you do. Plus, these aren’t even really issues. Unfreezing food? If it’s that hard why not just go buy something ready-made? If you’re 80 with a man, the problem doesn’t go away; it gets worse because now you’re unfreezing for two people. You know they have AI that calls for help in injuries, right? Also, you can hire a PCA to come check on you at home. Nursing homes will be…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:21 AM
3

I’m surprised to see this honesty. But then men wonder why we don’t like them approaching us like this. You just answered it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 10:48 PM
5

This ^ I always equate red pills to incels. There’s hardly any difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:37 PM
3

What makes you think I chose poorly? Obviously I disagree, and I’m also not the one complaining about relationship problems all over the internet. Seems to me like I chose rightly, but feel free to enlighten me. Also, I can’t tell you how many people of both genders have come to me and said they wish they had done the same. They’re just not strong enough to do it. Maybe I should specify that I do enjoy solving problems, and that’s what I do as a job. (I’m a researcher, for crying out loud. Lol I…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:25 PM
5

And a man ain’t gonna solve problems either; he’s gonna come with more problems. I don’t need anyone to fuck. I don’t need a man to love me. I have friends. Especially when it would mean having to deal with him… no thanks. Lol Single life forever <3 I can get more fun out of my six figures than I could from a man in 10 years. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:13 PM
7

Forgive me if I’m wrong because I just joined a few days ago, but it definitely does not seem that these men are egalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:33 PM
1

I’m literally 20 years younger than that. Shows how much you know 😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:23 PM
1

How old do you think I am? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:20 PM
1

Leaving age out of it completely depletes the entire topic we’re talking about LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:09 PM
1

Youthfulness goes away with age. Lol so there’s a contradiction Sure, let’s compare values. Leo DiCaprio = fine as hell in his 20s and ugly AF now Same with many other examples. Nobody gains value with time or age, except like I said, George Clooney.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 05:57 PM
1

In this case you’re speaking of using fuckgirls, not quality more desirable women like the other user is pointing out. Someone of quality of either gender will see through the lies because they’re not gonna sleep with you immediately. If someone gets virgins to sleep with them that easily, it’s not because of lying; it’s because they possess another attribute that makes them attractive. So no, lying is not going to get you more access to better sex partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 05:34 PM
1

Yeah, when men say they age like wine I just laugh because it’s such a cope and is obviously untrue. The only man who gets better with age is George Clooney. Can’t explain it; he’s just miraculous. But that’s the only exception on the planet, as far as I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 05:14 PM
3

Maybe that’s why I don’t date and find it pointless. It’s not bringing anything to the table. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 04:47 PM
1

Being good-looking isn’t bringing something to the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 01:01 PM
4

As someone who owns a vibrator and makes six figures, I can say that’s not really bringing anything to the table. I could list quite a lot of negative things they bring, though, but that’s a tangent and is not the direction of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 01:00 PM
–

As a neuroscience and philosophy major, I’d love to weigh in on this. My thesis was actually on a topic closely adjacent to this question. No, sex and being socially accepted are not needs. They are desires based on practice of what most would call “social eugenics,” which is basically what you mentioned about people who are born into more advantageous scenarios having an upper hand, even unfairly. This is something that comes with the way we have set up and managed our societies, especially in …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 12:49 PM
36

There literally is nothing that RP men bring to the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 12:16 PM
7

Nowhere in this does the question of what RP men bring to the table get answered.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 12:09 PM
16

Summary: They bring nothing to the table and are asking for something they can’t return. (They’re not choosing the woman out of raw attraction like they’re asking for.)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 12:07 PM
10

I say the same about men. I won’t date a manwhore. Plus, I just don’t find being with a man to be worth any time or effort. I live a happily single life. And there are very few men who even appeal to me. Most seem controlling and not smart. No thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 01:59 PM
1

I can’t speak for everyone, but here’s my view: The career a person has says a lot about that person. I don’t need a man for any of the things you mentioned and I make six figures a year. But there are few jobs making less than $80k that tell me the man is educated and responsible. So it’s not his job or income I care about so much as his education and sense of responsibility, his values. These things often correlate, though. I’d rather have a guy with a doctorate who can teach kids to be educat…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 12:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter