TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_growing Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by _growing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Today, Saturday, I wanted a day off; I just wanted to work on my much-neglected model railroad. What I received, instead, was door slamming and shouting about things that needed doing around the house. I'm pissed. I'm selling all my model trains. In fact, I told her I'll package them up, put a post-it on them with a realistic price, and she can sell them on ebay and keep the money. I'll pay the shipping and she can keep the money the buyer gave her for shipping. This seemed to be a very agreeabl…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:49 PM
18

I'd like to ask OP what the girls think about that, as I hope they disagree with the teacher. I think the teacher has dangerous ideas and this incident should be reported to the principal or another authority.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 06:06 AM
0

I understand that you hope for marriage as the standard, but... do you think children should have a present dad (or, viceversa, mom) only if the dad is married to the mom? I mean, there is still a dependent needy child regardless of marriage.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 03:39 PM
7

Sorry to hear that. What issues does she think men should experience that women faced?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 06:26 AM
1

Unfortunately this sub disagrees with the idea that one can be against both misogyny and misandry Just my two cents: that's not the impression I (F) got. for many people in this echo chamber, teaching children about misogyny means subjecting boys to misandry The issue with the article is that it doesn't address the issue of violence in an objective way. Rapists and abusers exist - they come in both sexes, and both sexes suffer from that. And it is equally wrong when the victim is male or female,…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 12:57 PM
-1

So you believe children are being killed by abortion, and your reaction to that is that it's ok to abandon born ones?
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:51 PM
3

Yeah it's puzzling to me that the first thing to be brought up is child support. No mention of at minimum coparenting the child, no concern about the child being cared for and loved... It's the right time for a change of perspective. Yours is good advice.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:15 PM
3

What's the text of the bill?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 07:50 PM
1

It is interesting that the same OP has posted an article with a different point of view on a women's sub https://peakd.com/news/@arraymedia/historic-change-in-italy-sexual-assault-laws-now-center-on-free-and-current-consent (I think I can't link the post)
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:40 AM
1

Thanks for sharing your perspective. There are widely different opinions on what this law entails - by average people and lawyers - making it difficult for someone without a law background to understand what is going on and form an opinion. What would the application of the past law look like in a case where two partners start having sex with consent being freely given, at some point one verbally asks to stop but the other continues (assume no physical injuries and no threats), with their partne…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:30 AM
2

77 women jurists were against it Are you referring to this document? https://www.sistemapenale.it/it/documenti/femminicidio-documento-penaliste As far as I understand, these women claimed that basically it's about patting oneself on the back to think one has done something, when it won't change anything as 1)you can already get life in jail for these crimes and 2)increasing the sentence hasn't been proved to have a deterrent effect. They argued prevention is what we should invest in, to address …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/25 10:38 AM
0

If you believe unborn human beings are legally being unjustly killed, why not support protections for them, instead of accepting the legality of elective abortion and on top of that suggesting laws that would make born children financially worse off?
/r/MensRights27/11/25 12:36 PM
7

You don't have to label yourself as feminist. If one sees this as an inherent problem, they can ask for your stance on a specific topic and you can answer without needing to tie yourself to a broader movement. Also, different people may not share the same definition of feminism, so it is always better to explain one's beliefs further than just assuming you both mean the same thing by "feminism".
/r/MensRights21/11/25 07:51 PM
1

I missed this news. Could you share a source?
/r/MensRights12/10/25 03:36 PM
6

I am perplexed, wondering where OP read that a written form would need to be signed. The English article quotes an Italian opinion piece but I don't see what the latter piece is basing its claims on. At this link under the section "testi disponibili" (available texts) you can find the text of the bill 1693, which you can automatically translate: Amendment of Article 609-bis of the Penal Code concerning sexual violence and the free expression of consent I don't see any mention of written contract…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:23 PM
8

OP I am perplexed: where did you read that a written form would need to be signed? I saw your article quotes an Italian opinion piece but I don't know what the latter piece is basing its claims on. At this link under the section "testi disponibili" (available texts) you can find the text of the bill, which you can automatically translate: https://www.camera.it/leg19/126?leg=19&idDocumento=1693 I don't see any mention of written contracts.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:53 AM
4

I obviously hope that won't be the case, as average pro-choicers see the unborn as fundamentally different from newborns. But this indeed reminds me of an interview I watched of pro-life philosopher David Hershenov. He had written the article "If abortion, then infanticide" to argue modus tollens that the arguments for abortion justify infanticide too, but since infanticide is immoral, so is abortion. He said philosophers responding to him started granting his implication but argued that infanti…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:46 PM
2

Yes. I agree these are heartbreaking cases as anyone would hope their child is healthy. Following the diagnosis I think parents should be connected to a community of people with that condition and their families so they feel supported, as well as specialist doctors, and in case of life-limiting diagnoses perinatal hospice and palliative care should be offered. I believe both mother and child should be treated as patients during pregnancy and abortion should be reserved for medical emergencies of…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:00 PM
7

All of them are seriously wrong for the same reason and should be equally condemned. Discussing the issue after reading an article about killing sons in no way erases or belittles the killing of daughters. Those daughters are not going to be brought back if we kill sons now, we have to stop altogether.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:02 PM
8

When women are finally allowed to choose for themsleves, men all of a sudden think they're oppressed and want to make us slaves again. Who is being treated like property to be disposed of if they are unwanted? Not us women but preborn human beings - sons in this case - by their own mothers. Is our ultimate freedom achieved by killing our offspring? Also, gender wars are harmful for everyone, we are all human beings and that's what matters.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 02:58 PM
19

There should be no such thing as the right to have a child with the features you want, as if children were property. Let alone the right to a dead son.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 02:41 PM
6

what can be done about this? Advocating for the recognition of the right to life of human beings in the embryonic and fetal stages of life.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 02:09 PM
2

It's odd to think it takes two people to have a baby, yet one to get rid of it. Yes, it's odd, the baby should be protected from violence done by anyone. I personally would always choose my baby, but it still wouldn't matter to me if others didn’t. Make financial abortions a thing Maybe it wouldn't matter to you since you are not the one affected, but have you thought about the person who gets harmed by this - the child who is abandoned by his/her father?
/r/MensRights06/08/25 06:16 AM
0

So born young dependent human beings don't get neglected by their father and unborn ones don't get killed by their mother? I'll take the deal, it sounds like a win win that protects children.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 06:01 AM
33

It's messed up. On a more positive note, in this interview in Italian, those who opened this support centre say (at 7:04) that since the news has spread about it, they have been contacted by several organisations and town halls across Italy who expressed interest in doing the same, and (at 10:17) they have received many emails from citizens with compliments and encouragement to persevere. https://youtu.be/vDRwyNBrDBg?si=ZL3DVlFXQ0HAdR02
/r/MensRights30/07/25 04:05 PM
1

What happened in the UK?
/r/MensRights28/07/25 12:56 PM
1

So in the case sons and daughters are protected from being killed in the mother's womb, then they also get not to be abandoned by their father? But if they can be killed before birth, then we should make it "fair" (in a weighing of interests that excludes the sons/daughters) by letting them be neglected by their father as well? a single mother is better than an emotionless, unwilling, or non-accepting father. Is it acceptable for the father to act like this? How about we educate men and women to…
/r/MensRights10/07/25 05:21 AM
0

As a prolife woman, I agree with you. Children should be protected inside the womb and cared for outside as well. Parental responsibility goes both ways and it's sad to see it painted as chains to free yourself from, both by men and women.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:42 PM
2

I believe all human beings have inherent dignity, from womb to tomb. If it's inherent/intrinsic, it means it's grounded in the kind of thing you are, in our commonly shared nature as human beings - a rational one, not on something we earned. That's the foundation of human equality and it's not dependent on sex. It's different from attributed dignity, the extra respect that someone may earn from others because of what they do to help society. If you perceive men (or you specifically) are treated …
/r/MensRights21/06/25 08:54 AM
3

Yeah, that's what's shocking to me: how come only the testimony where she accuses is considered sincere - she cannot have been manipulated - but in the second testimony, where she admits she lied, they think she has been manipulated?
/r/MensRights16/06/25 02:07 PM
33

https://www.newyorker.com/sections/news/why-has-daryl-kelly-been-imprisoned-for-the-last-twenty-years-for-a-crime-that-likely-never-happened This article from December 2017, shortly before his parole hearing, says: He was living with his wife and five children in Newburgh, New York, in the fall of 1997, when he was arrested for rape and sexual abuse. The supposed victim was his oldest child, Chaneya, who was then eight years old. Chaneya testified against her father at trial; the jury convicted …
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:28 AM
1

I am not American so I am not talking about supporting Republicans, but only about the pro-life position. The reason pro-lifers want abortion to be banned stems from the principles of non-discrimination and non-violence towards fellow human beings, when applied to unborn ones. Of course, many pro-choicers disagree that unborn human beings are morally valuable, and I agree that if I believed so, I would support abortion. But if you thought they were morally valuable, if you thought there were two…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 11:58 AM
1

a human in the uterus is considered part of the woman What? Do you have a source for that?
/r/MensRights04/06/25 03:00 PM
-1

No adult woman in 2025 gets pregnant by accident. There are simply too many options for contraception, and education on the topic is readily available. I've never implied we do. We agree on this. Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. I believe people should have options and freedom to choose before another human being is conceived, but after reproduction has taken place, parents should team up and step up rather than making things only about their own individual desires. When a child is c…
/r/MensRights04/06/25 12:19 PM
0

somebody else willed that being into the world against your wishes Offspring from sexual reproduction exists from conception, and it takes two to tango. Nobody's rights are being violated when a human being is conceived, that's just normal expected biological processes, the reproductive act resulting in its reproductive function. No legal entity acknowledges or makes room for it. What is your suggestion exactly?
/r/MensRights04/06/25 08:08 AM
2

I am a pro-life woman who would like there to be more/better dialogue between those with differing opinions - I listen to the arguments in favor of abortion as well to better understand the position. This has nothing to do with hating women, rather it is a bioethics stance on when our moral status began. Both supporting and criticizing abortion are opinions on morality that follow from philosophical arguments. Both sides of the debate seek to protect human rights, to do the right thing, but they…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:09 AM
1

On what is this right to abortion based other than "I desire an abortion"? How do you prove it trumps the right to life? Well in Italy there are 10 mandatory vaccines that children must get. That is done to protect others (as well as yourself), especially the immunocompromised. As for smoking and drinking, sure, it's legal as the act in itself is not harming anyone else. But it's illegal to smoke inside buildings, it's illegal to smoke right next to a pregnant woman - we can't always choose to d…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:12 PM
1

The alternative is killing them by evicting them in an environment they are not supposed to survive in. I think one's right to life weighs more than one's bodily autonomy, because not being killed is the necessary condition to have any other rights. So I also think one's right to life trumps someone else's right to bodily autonomy. Actually, I think there is no bodily autonomy violation in the first place because the baby is just growing via biological processes, they are not committing any act …
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:22 PM
1

So if I gave birth to a boy, you think I shouldn't be able to get him circumcised (which isn't a thing in my country anyways) because you believe he should be protected from impairment, from a choice he couldn't consent to. But before birth, you think I should be able to inflict lethal harm upon him? What happened to protecting the child in this case, from a choice he couldn't consent to?
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:03 PM
4

I don't find the argument "you have the right to refuse the use of your body to keep someone else alive even if they will die if you refuse" to be a good representation of pregnancy because it conflates the negative right not to be killed (which is what pro-lifers care about protecting and is violated by abortion) and the positive right to be saved from a fatal condition (which, if it existed and was absolute, would be violated by refusing a bone marrow donation/kidney transplant). When talking …
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:23 PM
2

I can't imagine how painful that must be...
/r/MensRights04/05/25 03:31 PM
2

I'm prolife as well. Your first sentence sounded like you were saying the fetus is not a child, then you provided the source of biologists saying the life of a new human begins at conception. Sorry if I misunderstood, English is not my first language.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:58 PM
1

it's untrue a fetus is a child biologists have stated this time and time again Your other sentences sound like you're prolife. Did you make a typo here or am I misunderstanding?
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:28 PM
2

Non American here. Doesn't Texas have an abortion ban after the unborn's heartbeat is detected? This seems like a consistent pro-life move to recognise that just as the mother should provide care to the child via pregnancy, the father should contribute financially.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:21 PM
1

Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker and I didn't understand what you mean here: how i get my back aging these acquisitors Are you talking about the show Adolescence? Are you experiencing women in your daily life being disrespectful to you and/or accusing you of some offense?
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:44 PM
3

in real world experience I see completely different scenario, my female friends , colleagues they all love me adore me and never encountered any incident they are being violated (no they don't fear I would shot them if they don't like me) . I would suggest you focus on the people you know in real life, and limit online interactions to places where respect is practiced. Some subreddits are echo-chambers which engage in generalisations and don't allow content with a different opinion; or if they d…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 04:36 PM
5

For this to apply they have to be explicitly labelled as men/women-only in the first place. Otherwise it doesn't make sense to say women are invading men's space by going to the gym, just like it wouldn't make sense to say men are invading women's space by taking a cooking class.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:49 AM
2

I'm so sorry.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 09:02 AM
1

Sorry for the late reply. For children who are abused, the grave injustice which should be prevented is the abuse. It isn't not being killed. The life of people who survived abuse, as well as people who grew up in poverty still has value, dignity and meaning. They can hear us when we say things that imply that maybe they would have been better off dead. I can't choose to kill homeless people to avoid their suffering by deciding for them that their life is not worth living. I can't deprive someon…
/r/MensRights13/02/25 09:05 AM
2

I am a woman. That is great advice for both sexes.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 09:21 AM
1

It takes two to make a child. I encourage discussing the opinion on having children as well as contraception use before intimacy in order to make sure both people are on the same page. Before conception, I encourage everyone's reproductive choices - the mutual choice of whether to be intimate / trying for a child / trying to reduce the likelihood of having a child - which is not going to be zero unless you're sterile. Unless the horrible cases of rape, that's the full extent to which both men an…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 08:39 PM
-6

I would ask the question backwards. If society believes that a child should be provided for as they are dependent (therefore having child support laws in case of separation) shouldn't it also believe that the child at an earlier life stage, when they are even more dependent and vulnerable, should not be killed by abortion? In my opinion both parents should step up, we shouldn't get sucked into gender wars and turn the matter into which sex gets to neglect the child more, but rather the focus sho…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 06:22 PM
5

Your terms are acceptable - pro-life pro child support woman :) A child should be protected from lethal violence and should be cared and provided for. They can't be violating their mom's or dad's rights by simply existing.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 05:12 PM
4

I believe the culture of abortion has placed mothers against their children but also women against men. In fact, the dehumanisation of prenatal children has resulted in the shift of the focus away from the needs of the child and towards the individual desires of the mother but also of the father. In the debate on so-called 'reproductive rights' (abortion, paper abortion) and how to balance them across both sexes, these euphemisms hide a push for the right to kill or abandon the child, respective…
/r/MensRights29/01/25 05:03 PM
5

Yes, as a woman I think reporters should say the number of children, men and women affected by natural disasters/wars, not group together women and children and then forget to mention men. It's a matter of reporting in an objective and complete way. Similarly, the numbers of people from both sexes should be mentioned when discussing murder, deaths on the workplace, abuse, suicide... This way, if there is a specific effect disproportionately affecting men (such as suicide), proper programs can be…
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:08 PM
2

As a pro-life woman, I acknowledge that there is a minority of pregnancies which end up posing a threat of major bodily disfunction or a threat to the life of the mother, which is why such abortions are legally permitted even in states with abortion bans. Pro-life laws ban elective abortions, not life saving ones and not miscarriage treatment. In other words, if a procedure or medication (such as D&C, mifepristone + misoprostol) has applications in all these cases, it is its use in elective abor…
/r/MensRights24/01/25 04:16 PM
8

We see the rise of masculine patriarchal forces again which want to take away your rights and freedom. Could you be more specific about what you're talking about / which country?
/r/MensRights15/01/25 01:47 PM
3

No words to describe how disgusting her lies are. I hope these men and their families can recover from the trauma eventually.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 01:17 PM
3

Merry Christmas to everyone!
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:44 AM
2

I've briefly read about infanticide ("neonatal euthanasia") of seriously ill babies being legal in the Netherlands. Are you referring to this or instances of support for infanticide while it remains illegal?
/r/MensRights20/12/24 10:36 PM
2

if having sex is the same thing as consenting to parenthood then there wouldn't be any need for abortions. Right, abortions should be heavily restricted (with medically necessary exceptions to preserve the life of the mother) because nobody should need anybody's consent for existing. Children should only be born to parents that chose to have them, that is what is best for the child. They shouldn't be killed just because they are unwanted. And once they are born, they still deserve to be cared fo…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 05:05 PM
3

You matter :)
/r/MensRights15/12/24 11:27 PM
5

I saw one woman choke and slap the shit out of her husband while he was pinned in a carseat. I know it was the husband because I called out and asked if I should call the police. "No, it's my wife," he said in English. That's horrible. It was scrolling this sub that I found out that there is a 1523.it campaign to create a hotline to help men victims of violence, just like 1522 is currently the hotline for women. And that feminist groups in Napoli have opposed it because apparently a gender-neutr…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 11:46 PM
6

Are there groups speaking about men's issues there that you'd recommend checking out?
/r/MensRights10/12/24 06:54 PM
1

Hey, sorry for the late reply. I recognise it's a controversial topic, because a woman's body is affected for 9 months of pregnancy + birth + time for post-partum recovery - and there is stress and fear of how her life will change, especially if it's unplanned. So I am not trying to dismiss that. And you are right that we can’t force a living person, a brain-dead person or a corpse to an organ donation. But I would argue that abortion is more like this: after donating a kidney, after the transpl…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 01:40 AM
1

What's Greedy-Ambition? EDIT: Oh sorry, I've just realised you meant a user in this thread ahahah, I thought it was an advocacy group or something
/r/MensRights08/12/24 02:08 PM
1

I think it's related to abortion, but it's a bad take. Even if it was satire of the attitude of women having abortions towards their child ("your body, my choice"), the context implies that the reason for opposing abortion is men wanting to control women's bodies, which is only going to further division, creating tension, hatred, fear and distrust towards men and pro-lifers. Instead the reason is the belief that no human should be killed for being unwanted, including unborn children. Nobody shou…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 02:02 PM
1

OP I am very sorry for what you went through, there should be equal standards in opposing physical and sexual abuse regardless of the gender of the perpetrator. As a pro-life woman, I agree and I don't like this guy's slogan at all. It fuels tension between genders, it feeds the fear that this is what men and pro-lifers want, perverting the actual reason why we oppose abortion - that every human being should be granted an equal right to life. It shouldn't be anyone's choice to target an unborn c…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 01:41 PM
2

Hi, random prolife woman here, you can find more at the prolife sub. It is a common talking point by pro-choice activists that abortion = women's equality. This way, women are supposed to support it by default because otherwise we would be self-hating, whereas men should support it otherwise you are controlling mysoginists. In order to distract from the moral debate on what the embryo/fetus is, gender war is invoked and to support this narrative they act as if pro-life women don't exist. I belie…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:11 AM
3

That's not normal behaviour, I can't imagine me or someone else saying these "jokes" even in a group of all women. Everyone should learn from childhood that we should judge people individually based on their own actions - and no, demonising every man then saying "except you" doesn't count. If you take an example of wrong behaviour by a woman that they also agree is wrong and then you frame it as "all women do this", will they agree? For example: "all women are greedy and divorce their husbands i…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 02:49 PM
2

Forced conscription is exploitation of men who are sacrificed for the war industry. Abortion is the intentional and direct killing of innocent human beings. They are both forms of violence. Abortion is based on the dangerous idea that human rights can be conditional on somebody else's emotions towards us: our right to life depends on whether we are wanted. Unborn children, who are at the life stage of greatest vulnerability, are treated as disposable property of their mothers. To normalise this,…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:12 AM
2

Abortion is based on the dangerous idea that human rights can be conditional on somebody else's emotions towards us: our right to life depends on whether we are wanted. The humanity of unwanted unborn children is denied: at the same gestational age, an embryo/fetus called is "uterine content"/"fetal tissue"/"pregnancy tissue"/"product of conception" when unwanted, but a baby when wanted. This inconsistent shift of language is the result of deliberate denial, a desperation to be convinced that ab…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 09:42 AM
1

I see, supporting abortion is kind of the default position nowadays. You could check out the prolife sub if you're interested.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 02:56 PM
3

As a woman I agree with this, it's a technique to silence everyone (men and women) who disagrees by labelling their position as misogyny. The right to life is the source and foundation of every other right. It should be granted to every human being. The bodily autonomy of the woman shouldn't have priority over the life + bodily autonomy of her child.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 09:17 PM
0

That's like saying if you don't agree with infanticide it's really simple, don't kill your newborn. If you don't agree with spousal violence, it's really simple, don't beat your spouse. I understand that you don't believe an unborn child has the same moral status as a born one, but do you understand that if someone does, then it's obvious they oppose abortion? The abortion debate is a matter of human rights. The pro-life position is that every human being should be granted the right to life, we …
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:58 PM
2

Regarding the infanticide part, thankfully I've never met anyone in real life excusing that. However, Reddit is wild and there is a minority of users who, while finding it tragic, blame it on abortion restrictions. I find it absurd, as if someone said: "I fully oppose spousal violence and want to eradicate it. For this reason, violence on your unmarried partner should be legal, it will prevent having to resort to the only option of committing it after marriage due to desperation".
/r/MensRights03/11/24 09:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter