| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?Are you not aware that saying “why is there anger among men” This is a strawman, lmfaooooo. Proposes that Wait are you dumb fuck? Are you like slow or something? That would just mean I typed out a sentence that isn’t the same as what OP stated. It would just mean when I said “anger among men” is in relation to what they said. They’re both equally justified interpretations. You starting your quote Nope, my quote is predicated on what OP said, it’s just worded differently and you’re overthinking i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/22 04:43 AM |
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?Oh you’re a pseudo-intellectual, lmfaoooo. Okay anyways: The title doesn’t say that I’ve already fulfilled the burden of proof demonstrating why that definition is inherently predicated on what OP proposed, so if you have a contention then display it. It says Yeah I quite literally just refuted that, lol. Why are you repeating yourself? Do you have a learning disability or something? The anger is not from men I did not propose that at all. In fact, the title isn’t even gender-specific. It just s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/22 01:15 AM |
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?hy·poc·ri·sy /həˈpäkrəsē/ Learn to pronounce noun the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. Saying ”why is there anger among men who are promiscuous but don’t want to date a woman who does the same” invokes a propositional contradiction. Do you have a contention against that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/22 01:00 AM |
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?You really didn’t. Sending a link to an article isn’t demonstrating truth value. It’s just you sending a link, lol. No, I don’t “throw it out,” I’m literally telling you why it’s inherently wrong. Every link you’re sending cherry-picks and ignores specifics and/or doesn’t logically follow up to what you initially proposed. No, this is limiting the other possibilities that can demonstrate how things work. Even then, there is no objective measure to determine that a woman specifically always wants… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 02:44 AM |
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?😭😭😭😭 Do you not know how a discourse works? You proposed a positive claim. You’re essentially shifting the burden of proof by asking me to disprove a claim you made when really you should be the one proving your claim. You haven’t substantiated on anything. That which can be asserted without evidence gets dismissed without evidence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 01:59 AM |
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?Do you lack reading comprehension or something? I just told you why that sentiment is predicated on your claim, lol. I shouldn’t have to repeat myself unless I’m speaking to a pseudo-intellectual. LMFAOOOOO, and I’m telling you that arbitrarily stating “dating is hypocritical” doesn’t entail anything. Which question are you talking about sir? The one about if I think woman want a man to have more money than them? If you weren’t so slow, you’d probably realize I answered this already, lol. No you… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 01:52 AM |
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?That’s not a strawman. Unsubstantially throwing fallacies around doesn’t prove they’re fallacious. The whole “species” sentiment is literally predicated on your entire argument about emotions. You don’t have to directly verbalize it for it to be true, lol. No you didn’t. You said “dating is hypocritical anyway.” No you don’t, you have anecdotal evidence, which isn’t very argumentatively reinforced because I can just throw anecdotal evidence that negates yours, lmfao. That’s the issue with anecdo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 01:38 AM |
| 1 | How ''matched'' are most couples?Lol prove they aren’t. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 01:32 AM |
| 0 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?Okay so prove that, lol. If it’s based on emotions then your argument falls apart terribly since you would unironically have to demonstrate that every species holds relative emotional value on top of arguing why we should arbitrarily measure the emotions to determine one conclusive outcome. My point was already explained to you. I told you that your premise entails hypocrisy, and your only response really boils down to “uhm, I don’t think it’s hypocrisy!” Lmfao Okay, so you seeing people angry i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 01:23 AM |
| 1 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?Yeah, this is pretty much a strawman since I never proposed any of those statements you’re throwing out to me, lmfao. Plus your reply is arbitrarily predicated on the notion of which preferences are hypocritical and why they are hypocritical. You’re not really saying anything. Also, I’d like to point out that the premise of your post begs the question. It assumes that people are “angry.” | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 01:13 AM |
| 2 | Why all the anger when a guy who is probably promiscuous doesn’t want to date a woman who is the same?It literally falls under the definition of hypocrisy, lmao. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/22 01:07 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter