TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_mainlander Archive

View 0 posts and 812 comments by _mainlander on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

> I disagree that's fine. let's stop here. your disagreement is with the dictionary, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:52 PM
–

I comprehend fine. you simply contradicted yourself. you said: > They have kids because of male ego and unabashed self-interest. I get that’s a big driver for them. I can’t relate. but then when i point out that anyone who has kids is doing it for selfish reasons, you agreed. > you’re going to have a kid for self-interest (which anyone who has a kid not by force is doing) so you can relate after all. because root cause is the same. both men and women want kids for selfish reasons. selfishness is…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:44 PM
-1

> If you’re going to have a kid for self-interest (which anyone who has a kid not by force is doing)… i appreciate you acknowledging that. that was the only point i was making. > My point is males want kids but don’t seem to envision any of the labor of raising kids. They just say they want kids like kids are a theoretical concept that someone else deals with. And that’s all good for him because now he can check off his list “had offspring.” From my observation, i would agree with this too. > … …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 06:33 PM
-3

> They have kids because of male ego and unabashed self-interest. as do the women. to point out your ignorance, there's no unselfish reason to have kids regardless of your gender. > want kids have them for a very simple reason: we want to yes. it's all about what the parent wants. never what the kid wants. the kid didn't ask to be born in this world to suffer, age and die. > When I think of kids I think of sacrifice and hard work... Not just for 9 months of my body. But 18+ years of nurturing an…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 09:29 AM
–

so you agree with me that PPD applies it's rules whenever it feels like. <image> letting the users break some rules here and there means PPD mods come down hard on anyone, any time, whenever they feel like by pointing out they broke some rule some time ago. all it does is give them leverage. they are never "safe" in PPD. in PPDU incels, femcels and blackpillers will be explicitly allowed (but not misogyny/misandry!). can't lord over someone and ban them for rules that don't exist!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:46 AM
–

<image> then i suggest you look closer.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:40 AM
–

too late haha, subreddit names can't be changed
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 08:04 PM
–

yep. it should be clear enough to most users on PPD once they spend long enough here how biased the mods are I didn't make PPDU cause i wanted to. i did it because it had to be done. <image> mod abuse in PPD hasn't changed for years and never will. enough is enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:00 PM
–

absolutely egregious!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 06:55 PM
–

terrible! this really show's there's no saving the situation as is. not from inside PPD. if PPD continues to be a monopoly, then it will continue to be a monstrosity. competition makes it better for all users (:
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 06:50 PM
–

this is exactly the kind of thing im going to prevent in PPDU
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 06:48 PM
–

and only them. that's what makes it unbalanced
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:56 PM
–

yeah I notice some users say it gets less strict after they changed their flair
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:50 PM
–

It feels like it for sure!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:42 PM
–

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:41 PM
–

<image> PPDU does not support misogynist views
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:37 PM
–

oh, that's today haha, just below https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1tbkpzb/comment/olkjtsk/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button but there's stuff going back years like... it's not getting better here in PPD https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebateUncut/comments/1ta3bc5/the_persistent_problem_of_moderation_with/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:33 PM
–

<image> yeah. this is unacceptable like!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:27 PM
–

I wouldn't know. mod mail is generic. but there's deffo rumours going around about particular mods im sure everyone here has their own stories on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:23 PM
3

ah reddit mods. i made it clear in that i draw distinction between blackpill and hate speech <image> so the onus will be on them to prove there's a problem. im not here to support hate speech at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:14 PM
8

If you’re tired of selective moderation, narrative control, and certain viewpoints getting shut down on PurplePillDebate, check out PurplePillDebateUncut. The goal is simple: open discussion without power-tripping mods deciding which opinions are “acceptable.” Blackpill, incel, redpill, bluepill, skeptics all perspectives can be discussed as long as people engage honestly. No curated narratives. No ideological gatekeeping. Just debate. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebateUncut/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:08 PM
3

i am the admin of PPDU i was inspired to make PPDU based on what PPD promised to be - and failed to live up to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:00 PM
8

ATTENTION If you’re tired of selective moderation, narrative control, and certain viewpoints getting shut down on PurplePillDebate, check out PurplePillDebateUncut. The goal is simple: open discussion without power-tripping mods deciding which opinions are “acceptable.” Blackpill, incel, redpill, bluepill, skeptics all perspectives can be discussed as long as people engage honestly. No curated narratives. No ideological gatekeeping. Just debate. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebateUncut/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 04:41 PM
5

keep up the high standards champ king!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:40 PM
2

not a man, but I feel most people don't care about most people. men aren't special in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:39 PM
3

im keeping an eye on you >.>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:33 PM
2

<image> ^ good documentary
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:23 PM
–

PSA to all the partnered men out there. Go forth and have as many 1st dates with other women as you like. After all, if your partner asks "are you dating other women?" you can emphatically answer "no", because women don't consider meeting a 100 other women in 1st dates as "dating". careful now, just make sure to wrap up your business by the 1st date. you're only in trouble if you have 2nd or more dates with the same woman. but if it's 1st dates only. it's not "dating", so don't worry about it ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:03 PM
1

well 1: he's not wearing womens' clothes. 2: yeah if budget is infinite then men can all wear suits then. that's peak men's attire.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:01 PM
1

so she likes it rough huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:51 PM
–

these people who don't know definitions of words as per the dictionary and then gaslight other people about what they think the definition of the words are - are starting to get on my tits. just a little bit. just a tad. just a tip...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:44 PM
1

right, but was that in a man's style? > The most stylish men out there don’t limit themselves to the men’s section. i wanna see examples of this
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:29 PM
2

it is a strategy. it's useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:14 PM
3

yes he does
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:13 PM
1

<image> go on. no but seriously women's clothes don't fit on men. poor fit is worse than anything. what are you suggesting?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:10 PM
0

oh it's definitely not the only way. niches and broad appeal are just two different strategies. but she's writing off mass appeal as not a strategy. it totally is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:09 PM
1

in what way?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:08 PM
1

> Straight men go to the gym to try and improve their attractiveness because it’s a simple repetitive task that they can understand how to do. also everyone should be hitting the gym, but especially women because heavy lifting improves bone density. women are more susceptible to osteoporosis (accelerated by menopause), showing signs even as early as 30yo! (which you wont know unless you do a scan)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:01 PM
2

> Being stylish and dressing well would improve their attractiveness more, but that takes a level of cultural knowledge and artistic flair that most of them are just not capable of. this is kinda bs and ill tell you why. walk into any clothes shop. it's 80% women section (with loads of variety and selection), 10% kids section and 10% men section (somewhere upstairs or in the basement, with a pair of pants and three shirts). even IF you want to do something about style as a man, your choices are …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:58 PM
0

💀💀💀
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:51 PM
1

baa baaaa!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:50 PM
0

mass appeal means attractive to large audience as oppose to niche appeal. it does not mean 100% attraction of everyone ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:48 PM
1

what did you look like before?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:46 PM
1

> never realizing that nothing has mass market appeal Brad Pitt has entered the chad chat...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:45 PM
1

we must keep up the good work fighting these semantic injustices!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 05:09 PM
0

i would describe them as someone i dated. the number of dates i went on with them is irrelevant. "dating" just means going on dates with. whether that's 100 dates with the same person, or 100 dates with 100 people (1 date each) is irrelevant to the fact both of those describe the same thing - going on date.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:59 PM
2

my semantic guy!! <3
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:55 PM
1

and your source is vibes? show me your dictionary then (:
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:50 PM
2

you're trying to redefine a word, why is that so difficult to understand? https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1t3jv1k/comment/ojw7yvb/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:42 PM
1

yep
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:41 PM
2

"going on dates" == "dating" doesn't matter if it's 1st/2nd or nth date. > Why do you need an other term for that? You expressed what you wanted, no? my point exactly! "dating" already means "going on dates". we don't need to redefine it. going on 100 1st dates is "dating". <image> there's no specific number of dates attached to the meaning of the word "dating".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:39 PM
3

thats cool. I was thinking there was some perhaps some specific goal or something. or you're gonna die soon or something. you're very fortunate to know what you want so early and be able to execute.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:36 PM
3

Tinder is "dating" app is it not? yet it only facilitates the 1st date. you don't go back on Tinder to schedule a 2nd date with same person do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:32 PM
1

ok so what's the term for "going on 100 1st dates" ? to avoid future confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:31 PM
2

so equal. that would be my guess. thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:28 PM
1

no time to waste? why the rush?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:05 PM
1

so if someone goes on 100 1st dates, they are not "dating"? what are they doing then? what's the term for that activity? what would you call it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:04 PM
3

wow. that's some serious efficiency right there!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:58 PM
3

> 11 relationships. 5 with guys, 5 with gals ooh that's a good even split. so tell us, which were worse - guys or girls :P
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:37 PM
1

i had to double take your flair. a woman who's KHHV by 38? > (Family stuff, closed myself off from the world, etc.) I'd be very interested to hear more. here or DM w.e. way - if you'd like to say more on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:32 PM
–

should ask GPT generate a photo of what GPT thinks you yourself look like based on previous convos. i don't think PPDers are prepared to face that (black) mirror just yet! XD
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:19 PM
1

what age is "post wall"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:17 PM
–

noobs at suffering? lol ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:14 PM
–

i do know the gaming term actually. i just dont understand what you're applying to? noobs at what?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:10 PM
–

you're so hard to please woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:58 PM
–

noobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:58 PM
–

different issues. apples and oranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:57 AM
–

10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:34 AM
–

> woman can just go fuc themselves oh im sure there are men happy to assist with that
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:33 AM
–

xD
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:59 AM
–

does that answer my question? forgive me if im not smart enough to understand how that answers my question. im talking about the experience itself. the guy who went with 10 escorts complained it was all mechanical, no spark, no real attraction, low enthusiasm. the one time he was with someone who actually wanted him was significantly more enjoyable. now im asking you is this: > im asking you how likely is professional to be better than organic attraction? in other words, was he just unlucky and …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:55 AM
7

why? Misogyny alone is not an aphrodisiac, it's simply exposed as not a relevant variable or at least not relevant enough, to overall outcomes of dating success.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:48 AM
8

<image> i think there's some women are wonderful bias going on here. when i was young and dumb and inexperienced i too thought that women were "better people". like literally, morally superior. i honestly thought that. i was inspired. (yeah yeah, clown me in the comments lol) personally i'm the type who want's to learn and get better and i learn from those who are better than me. the primary reason i started to date women (other than sex) was to literally learn how to be a "better person". more …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:45 AM
–

huh? im asking you how likely is professional to be better than organic attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:27 AM
4

<image> men who date women have more negative view of women than men who don't date women. Contrary to the hypothesis that misogyny is driven by romantic struggles, support for gender equality has typically been lower among boys who go on dates, and has decreased by a similar amount among boys who go on dates and those who don’t. Misogyny is not a barrier or hinderance to dating and seems to increase with dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:24 AM
–

declare what lol? more like they have no idea what you're talking about. you do realise this pill stuff is known to a vanishingly tiny percent of the population?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:22 AM
2

> attitude of a blue pilled woman you mean just... a regular normie?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 12:19 AM
1

sounds like we're in agreement then
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:04 PM
5

> There’s that AI generated pic going around where a man is walking down the street with a robot woman laughing and holding hands while a (human) woman sits on the street like a homeless person crying about being “replaced.” that pic never made sense to me anyway. it's only half true. it's missing the part where woman is also walking down laughing with a robo Chad. no one sits on the street. homelessness is eradicated. bots do all the work now. otherwise yeah, it's deffo just trying to rage bait…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:04 PM
5

she's got a real death grip if you know what im saying ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:00 PM
4

> All of the “social currency” (or whatever you want to call it) of having a wife/gf is non-existent. Your co-workers/friends etc are all talking about their wives/gfs/husbands etc, do you just stand there and nod? Or do you talk about your robot gf too? And if you don’t reveal that she’s a robot, do you just avoid ever introducing her to anybody? the mistake there was overestimating how much socialising these incels are doing right now. tell their friends about robo gf? what friends...?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:59 PM
1

> pay professionals, you will likely have much better sex how likely? know a dude who went to 10 of them. then one time he had woman he met actually interested in him to actual sleep with him he swore it's x10 better. not the sex itself, rather the attraction. attraction is a heluva drug. (and kids stay away from drugs!)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:43 PM
1

blue pill disorder? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:35 PM
2

<image> lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:34 PM
1

> Society is built around the ways that we're useful to each other. The moral challenge is to step beyond that and view others as full human beings with their own subjectivity. i don't see a contradiction there. you see people as subjective beings and derive use from that very fact. that's committees in a nutshell. i don't consider people finding people useful the same as reducing them to subjective-less inanimate objects.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:32 PM
2

are you talking about other debates? what else we talk about i forgot xD it's all blending together
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:49 PM
1

> viewing them only in terms of how they're useful to you people do that to people all the time. you find someone attractive? that's useful. they got good genes. produce good offspring. you like your partner has money, good job? that's useful. obviously. find them funny, charismatic? that's useful. keeps you entertained. find them smart? useful, stimulates you with conversations. etc. etc. if people dated people who weren't useful in some shape or form, then uggo homeless people with no educatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:47 PM
1

for me it's not about having to beat someone. competing answers the question "where do I stand?". the standing itself is not the most important bit, it's knowing it. because you can't improve what you don't measure (:
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:31 PM
0

> I also don’t find competing to be fun so there is that. then I think you won't get it then. the game doesn't matter. whether it's dating, or capitalism, or chess, or basketball. for those with competitive spirit, once they pick a game, they want to see how far they get. > like female attention is that prized that some guys structure their entire lives and hobbies around it is wild. yeah. once you pick a game there's no point half assing it. you're either in it to win it or not. no different th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:25 PM
-2

:0
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:19 PM
2

> Or meditating a ton Buddhistpilled!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 06:19 PM
2

men 👎👎
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 06:13 PM
1

> Like there are men who only go to the gym, dress well, buy cars, even work or go to college with the soIe reason being female attention. i dunno what's there to be surprised about. it's just a fun game. humans are competitive. they like to compete. competing is fun. why play sports? competing is fun. why play online games? competing is fun. people have fun w.e. they prefer to have fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 06:12 PM
4

> I had it drilled in my head as a teenager that if you get no girls then you must be a loser interesting. where i grew up no-one ever talked like that. growing up around prejudiced people will sure have an effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 06:03 PM
1

man why you gotta be so prejudiced against autistic people? what they ever do to you? oh lemme guess, they made a sexually forward comment without passing the vibe check HAHAHAHA
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 04:35 PM
1

> In this scenario it's perfectly ok, this is not objectification because she visibly likes it. lol no. you just compared wanted objectification vs unwanted objectification
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 04:01 PM
1

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:56 PM
2

hmhmhm https://np.reddit.com/r/Funnymemes/comments/1t0d3en/is_this_a_good_use_of_space/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:46 PM
1

and then they reproduce...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:36 PM
2

employer sounds like a pimp
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 02:23 PM
2

does indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 02:21 PM
1

she's making a joke of this post https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1t2fquz/rules_for_real_sigma_men/ are you familiar with alpha/beta/sigma people? this is just extension of that
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 02:19 PM
1

<image> asian
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 02:17 PM
1

The Emperor is naked!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 02:08 PM
1

im in tech and did my CS masters had AI module lol. it's not about knowing the tech, but any given clip you can still doubt "AI ... or just very well executed real act?" if I had to really guess i would lean AI. it's a bit too clean and too perfect. whole set up sounds very implausible. this clip is smoking gun i'd say https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX1xpHqShKZ/ the transition from uniform to dress while maintaining same pose, position and lighting everything is wayyyyy too perfect to be real - …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:18 PM
3

pandriarchy!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:09 PM
1

> To us we can tell what is fake lol i can't tell those clips were fake. like insincere sure, but i can't tell if it's AI generated, or real woman acting. that part is way past uncanny valley now
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:06 PM
1

this is kind scary. so many people don't understand what AI slop is. i was watching the clips and could not find any "AI errors" in. this may as well be "real" as far as i can tell. old men have no chance lol today Trump can claim fake news and it would be hard to dispute that. we can throw all video evidence away now. proves nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:50 AM
1

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX2KTcJTZ97/ no PPD can't post can compete with AI grade bait like this xD
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:47 AM
1

every clip has some kinda old men in it in the background lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:45 AM
1

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXZlaGJEoiB/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:44 AM
1

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXkOYsdzb9Z/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:43 AM
1

lol https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXulAyrT8FV/ lol! https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXpVMjDzpYc/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:42 AM
0

so 18 yo with 30 yo NEET is an even match then.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:34 AM
2

XD
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:32 AM
3

putting it mildly lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:30 AM
3

christ why are people making big deal of this? why can't people accept that different people have different preferences and move on when things don't match. him being sexual doesn't make him bad. her not being sexual doesn't make her bad. there's no need for that post at all. making problems where there aren't any. they don't match each other and that's that. he just needs to find someone who matches his vibe. end of story. girl I matched on Tinder, first message she sends me "i'll show you some…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:17 AM
3

real Buddhistpilled!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:59 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LwY6L95Abk
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:54 AM
2

change age range to 20s then. that group is still playing around (:
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:51 AM
4

<image> nothing to do with the dom sounding invite there. nothing at all...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:50 AM
1

> no way i'd go for tau oh you racist!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:44 AM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:40 AM
2

sounds like sampling bias. <image> I invite you to explore lesbian subreddits to test your assumptions https://np.reddit.com/r/LesbianActually/search/?q=don%27t+like+oral&cId=23af5d3f-e4d6-40b9-bd71-38ef891a7a04&iId=31f551bd-9c06-448d-a7c7-cb940aa29ac1
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:38 AM
1

wow. take the fact that different women have different preferences and somehow spin that into blaming men. misandry 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:07 AM
1

just different people in different bubbles. if you live in blue state in US you may not run into any republicans either - doesn't mean most aren't republican country wide winning majority vote. over and over people in this sub have hard time grasping that they are always living in some local bubble that does not represent the full wider world.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:04 AM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:57 AM
–

age is just a number. dude is living his best life. let him! don't be jealous!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:46 AM
–

what's the point of Transmax though? you can already date transwomen if you want and if you wanna date men just hop on grindr. don't need to become woman for that
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:21 AM
–

> You don’t have to rely on someone else for boobs, you grow your own. lol. you don't need hormones for that, just body fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:19 AM
0

yet women don't seem to care or forget that when a hot chad who's been around shows up and wants to bang?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:16 AM
2

<image> lol. top reason women should stay away from obvious chads who obviously been around. too bad they're too hot to resist though huh :P
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 10:51 PM
–

yes i screenshotted the definition of agape love. you're welcome to look it up yourself if you don't believe me. there's nothing arguable about the definition, no less than a "tree" being a "plan" is arguable 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 08:34 PM
–

is the bear too dangerous now women going after alligators?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 08:50 AM
–

that's a 24 karat, Super unleaded 97, 99.1% pure premium grade rage bait right there <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 08:47 AM
–

<image> uhmmmm. no.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 08:09 AM
–

well you got 2 types as per Buddhism and most philosophies: Agape love, the unconditional "wishing the best for someone regardless who they are". The highest form. Most wise. Leads to world peace. Then there's romantic attachment, driven by the ego delusion. Unwise. Unskillful. Leads to clings and cravings which then leads to many sufferings - jealousy, insecurity, greed, frustration, anxiety, grief and many more.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 12:08 AM
1

> that’s pettering out you have no evidence for that. meanwhile i've talked to 4 random women, from 4 different subreddits and every single one has been or is in age gap: 25 with 35 (LTR) 22 with 50 (LTR) 22 with 30s (a few short terms) 25 with 40 (LTR) from IRL i've known a few age gaps as well (short terms) one of the above was specifically looking for wealthy guy (but still a guy they like, not just any), the others just wanted someone emotionally mature and compatible and they don't care wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:58 AM
1

you can believe what you want
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:49 AM
–

interesting stats. didn't know bumble gave that breakdown, nice! > if there is a penalty for being picky, it's not enough of a penalty to render the app unusable. nooo never said it would make it unusable. rather there may be a penalty and no idea how big. it could be very small. much smaller than getting left swiped on by someone you right swiped on. but the thing is if you're avg. guy barely getting matches, even a small penalty could proportionally have bigger impact than someone with a popul…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:00 AM
1

ok! honestly i did have hard time parsing what the post was trying to say. if you wanna blame my reading comprehension that's fair lol, i'll take the L (:
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:45 AM
1

given 22% match rate there's no reason to assume you weren't penalised - it wasn't 100% after all. so that number alone tells you nothing. > I sort of assume I was being seen by most women no reason to assume that. how do you know you weren't penalised and would have instead gotten >22% match rate if you weren't penalised? you don't. unless you can account for what happened with the other 78%. they either left swipe, or didn't see, you can't tell which. > Any actual evidence of that? no. this is…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:17 AM
1

lot of women in their 20s aren't looking to settle down, that's many are open to exploring older ages. for those looking to settle down, i know a woman 25 dating 35 and im asking why? her response is "older is more mature, knows what he want's, not playing games" etc. im early 30s and went on Tinder for 2 weeks to see what's there. set my range +/- 10 years. the only likes and matches i got were from women early to mid 20s. i swiped through plenty of older women, they're there. You can't blame T…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:01 AM
2

> too many men cannot see that they have undesirable trait's and behaviors which results in not just nobody wanting to be around them ... EVERY MAN who display's anti-social behavior's in an excessive ... will insist ... their behavior it isn't a good reason for nobody to want to love them or be around them.... If your the kind of guy to always feel the need to comment on somebody's life, choice's, autonomy etc.. then your not the kind of guy ANYBODY want's to be with long term... Okey, big bold…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:05 AM
0

i've heard of this before. my only issue is with "block to burn". these apps are half diabolical with opaque algorithms and you don't know whats gonna happen or how blocks will be treated. the algos have changed over time etc, but at least in the past it used to be: when you left swipe a lot there's a penalty for being very picky and so you will be show to people less. no idea what happens when you block a lot. block is not a left swipe. it's a special function. no idea what impact it's gonna ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:25 PM
1

good answer <3
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 10:47 PM
-1

what is great advice for most men?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 10:29 PM
-4

then go for the pool with less competition and more single people, the 20s bracket. aaand that's what men are doing (:
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 09:30 PM
2

> Males almost seem genetically predisposed to suck worse at interpersonal bonding. you are right here afaik. women score slightly higher on measures of empathy and emotional attunement yes. but these are statistical averages. The overlap between men and women is still huge. Many men are highly empathetic, many women are not. > I’m saying certain men have to stop acting confused as to why they aren’t treated warmly when they themselves are not warm or likeable Socialization influence how people …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 09:28 PM
–

> It's proven by the fact cold approaching is always one of the least cited reasons for couples partnering. "cited reasons for couples partnering" is not a good metric. Over 50% of modern relationships begin through dating apps. so by your metric above, your advice would be that men should use dating apps then? That ignores that fact match rate for men on the apps is about 1-2%, which incidentally is about the same as cold approach hit rate of also 1-2%. Both of which can be raised. Make better …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:42 PM
2

it was a sarcastic joke, but everyone is taking serious so im just rolling with it :P
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:50 PM
2

> Men are made to serve the world or not? nope
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:49 PM
–

earth girls? easier than martian girls ill tell you that much!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:41 PM
–

> I'm giving that something that has better likelihood to work you can't prove that. utter speculation. you're not them. you can't know what has better likelihood of working for them. you're projecting. assuming everyone operates the same as you. i merely support keeping all options open. letting each decide their own. you got the ego to think you know how to live their lives better than them lol. incredible stuff for e.g. have you considered that if they were approaching and struggling, that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:29 PM
1

nobody should do anything. you're not some god who dictates who does what. > You are telling poor people to buy lottery tickets. unlike you, im not telling them to do anything. im simply supporting them w.e. they choose to do, supporting their freedom. im not a dictator. > And cold approaching is not a "preferred taste" - it's a sign of desperation that's your opinion and i disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:22 PM
2

> Women can have a different opinion than me. then why not acknowledge that in your comment? your comment was a sweeping generalisation as if you're speaking for everyone. if you made it clearer that's your own view only - not issues from me! could have avoided all this back and forth
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 05:17 PM
2

cute narrative. if only it was true. i've known plenty of selfish people who were neither alone nor lonely. im sure you've met plenty who were. point is selfishness does not guarantee loneliness. meanwhile it's absolutely RICH how you were bent of out shape arguing few days ago about all "advice" PUA/red pill influencers push out and calling it scam industry lol. yet i've seen you peddle that same image many times from Steve Maraboli - a self help guru with superficial, toxic-positive, useless a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:50 PM
3

you think he feels lonely? i don't believe so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:25 PM
2

> The bible is definitely too difficult for you. Eve wasn’t first woman, Lilith was. Lilith does not appear in the Bibles main narrative. She comes from later Jewish folklore a medieval text called the Alphabet of Ben Sira. Please, teach me more about the bible, it's too difficult for me (:
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:12 PM
2

> But it does require peak social skills and ability to connect on an emotional level quickly, which is quite rare. exactly. these people against it are just projecting the fact that they lack social skills to pull it off properly. a skill issue. issue was not the approach, it was execution of approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:03 PM
0

you mean 2026? millions still think that yes. it's the height of gullibility to believe all that anti-religious pseudoscientific propaganda! all of us are subjective. the only objective being is the creator of this universe. he was kind enough to write a book about it too! just read the words, it's not that hard (but it is that deep!). the insolence of these disbelievers knows no bounds!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 11:57 AM
1

you can characterise it how you like, but you admit it works for somebody. that's all that matters. it's not an impossibility. if people accept the risk:reward relationship, then there's nothing inherently wrong in pursing the course of action. cold approach, lottery, doesn't matter. who are you to tell people what level of risk they are allowed to take? you're not a god. if they want to take 1 in a billion shots, that's their prerogative. you can't convince someone out of their preferred risk t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 10:19 AM
2

> I think if more women had my realtively positive experiences then theyd be more open to it, but it seems like the men in my area are much more respectful than others. this is it. negative comments i see is to do with "it wasn't a nice encounter". we'll that's an issue with the approach of the approach, not with the approach itself. the advice could be "be nicer about it" not "don't do it", that's overkill.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 10:12 AM
1

so you deny that no relationships has ever started from cold approach? because that can easily be disproven. > Cold approaching is never respectful, short, or considerate. doesn't sound like an issue given some women will still get with men who cold approach. so either A - you're wrong here or B - those women tolerate it. either way it's a win for a man
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 10:01 AM
-2

for men reading at home, take notes, this is code for "I'm playing hard to get, definitely approach".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:59 AM
3

if it doesn't work and never worked, why do people keep doing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:56 AM
-9

"KEEPING HIS BELLY FULL AND HIS BALLS EMPTY: THINGS YOUR HUSBAND WISH YOU DO MORE OFTEN" https://www.amazon.co.uk/KEEPING-BELLY-FULL-BALLS-EMPTY-ebook/dp/B0BJKSH244 "Men’s needs consist of blow jobs and food, and women’s needs consist of… Lol jokes – women don’t have needs; they’re just lucky to have a man." based
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:44 AM
0

> The prevalence of it in online discussions seems to be super overblown compared to how much it happens in real life. for the readers at home, this literally applies to 99% of the posts about anything in this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:57 AM
1

he was right though. regardless how you feel about. and billions of people agree with him so you're kinda of a "black sheep" here lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:34 AM
4

yeah, a degree that's not selfish enough. after all rich people who are most selfish are far from the loneliest. do you agree Trump is selfish? i think he's pretty up there on selfish scale. yet he's had/has partners, kids and surrounded by people at all times. do you think he's lonely? i don't believe so. so sorry but "selfishness leading to loneliness" is some baseless hippy nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 08:28 AM
–

> Yeah it's easier just to fake your way into a social circle nah. maintaining social circles is way more work. i'd rather get jacked and rich instead lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:12 PM
–

sure. but what's next?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:10 PM
3

every single person on this planet is selfish. it's only a question of degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:09 PM
–

> Remind me again why I would have sympathy for anyone who considers me to be inferior and not deserving of the same rights? but you're shot and physically weak. the evolution has spoken. im sorry it's joever. just accept your fate
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:07 PM
4

facts
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:05 PM
-2

> men they think that everything (women especially) was created to serve them Eve was created from Adams rib for his pleasure. says so in the bible. > The truth is opposite; it's men who were created to serve the world. bullshit, where does it say in the bible?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:04 PM
27

have you tried changing your flair to male and oppose a woman and see what happens??
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:02 PM
–

ah yes. you've peaked. lemme know if you figure it out what's next... asking for a friend
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 10:45 PM
–

it's all dumb luck. you're just optimising for certain type of woman, not any woman. i've heard a bout a dude who is: - balding - fat - not very facially attractive - has neck beard - plays video games a lot - has no job - lives in his mother's basement yet he still has a wife! who works as video game developer - the sole bread earner lol how? well he's just a nice dude, gets along with people. social, goes to parties etc. helps people out. so meeting people through social circles and being very…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 10:36 PM
–

> Everyone agrees that dating is an important part of human life i dont. ergo, not everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 10:31 PM
–

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 10:28 PM
–

you're really committed to the bit aren't you haha
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 10:07 PM
–

tbf i'm gonna side with TBA here. just because you choose to date someone who cheated, doesn't mean you're looking to get cheated on, nor is it your fault if you get cheated on. you're giving someone a chance. people change. there's no guarantee cheater will cheat again. people can reform. if you think no cheater ever changes - no wrong doer ever changes, then might as well not bother with releasing prisoners either right - sure they'll just commit crimes again after release right. people aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 10:01 PM
–

interesting kind of bird, i like the way it flaps. what species is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 09:52 PM
2

you're welcome! > Personally, the idea of meeting a nearly complete stranger in real life is what makes me feel burnt out and/or full of dread. you could text them daily for 2 weeks beforehand till your comfortable. call won't necessarily add anything you couldn't have extracted text wise. There's another aspect to a video call. (wasted) first impression. You only get one first impression. You don't wanna blow it by getting random call when you're in your pyjamas, no makeup, bed head, poor light…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 09:09 AM
0

the silence is deafening
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 08:21 AM
1

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 08:19 AM
2

we'll you're partly wrong. they have casual sex and stay single forever. settling down - not required.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 11:32 PM
2

> What is your vetting advice for women? id say make sure the vet is reputable, accredited, good history of taking care of many different animals before you bring your man to them (:
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:41 PM
1

ironically, the "obvious" part was not obvious at all. i wasn't sure what he mean either.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:27 PM
1

> This post is very childish are you kink shaming my adult baby fetish? you'll never get in my pants with that attitude 💅
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:19 PM
1

yes sireee
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:09 PM
1

just you, me and all of reddit lol? if you want it you have to DM :P not telling publicly
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 08:04 PM
2

> people tied the idea of relationships to their self-worth. a lot of that too. more specifically ego. see ego is a delusion. <image> ego is not "you". this can be proven by the fact that ego can be "turned off" either chemically, meditation or just... going to sleep - when you awake there's a minute or so when your ego OS hasn't booted up yet and you have a whole "who the f am I? where the f am? when the f am I?". problem 1. most people are ignorant to the fact ego =/= you. problem 2. ego is co…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 08:02 PM
1

strategic ambiguity :P
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 07:50 PM
2

suspect? lol i thought it was obvious im a man. anyway. no it's nothing gendered. I know what you're trying to do, you're treating phone call and IRL as graduated steps - i'm arguing they are not. > a person with whom you can't have a decent phone call with will very likely be a bad date. so a hard disagree from me :P because some people suck at phone calls. humans did non evolve to interact via phone calls. they evolved to interact IRL. i know people who vibe perfectly fine IRL but are super aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 06:27 PM
1

yeah. i just call it "entertainment"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 06:03 PM
2

> An example is if I decorated my place everything would be utilitarian and ugly like most bachelor pads. so you prefer to decorate it in nice pink colors and flowers and teddy bears everywhere. that kinda thing? wait no, are you talking about adult baby fetish? that's cool man to each their own and all that!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 05:02 PM
0

for me it was pure novelty. something new to do. then i did it. then i got bored of it, like most things eventually. now few years later having explored the topic, im scratching my head same as you wondering how are these people still hooked on this for so long? some even do it for decades. blows my mind. though i suspect a lot of cognitive dissonance going around. after all, dead bedrooms and books written on it are as common as romantic relationships themselves. they see that as a "problem tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 04:55 PM
7

> women's childlike nature provides a good counterbalance to mine imo lol? only true if she is, in fact, a child hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 04:41 PM
5

> Sexual validation what is this point about?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 04:38 PM
2

and im saying it's not useful for that purpose. its faulty noisy signal. it's inconclusive. you can vibe on a call and not IRL. you can like the phone voice and not IRL one and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 11:22 AM
2

you must be mistaken! women are wonderful!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:39 AM
2

none of these things replace in face interaction. period. unless you plan for entire relationships to be forever remote and never IRL. im the opposite, i'd rather meet asap. neither photos, nor text, nor phone calls (audio/video) are true representation of in person interaction. photo/video have camera distortion. audio does not capture all the frequencies. text is missing body language. they're all "versions" of the person, not the "real full" person you see, hear, smell, touch, vibe with IRL. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:33 AM
4

back at you OP: "What would you call the emotional female monologues on this sub and why?"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:13 AM
-3

> Typically they just tuck the info away to use against you later. or some women try use it against men later. Know a girl who told her ex bf she was SAed. Later on they're breaking up because they're not compatible. She doesn't like that. Says breaking up with her is worse than death, worse than SA! Guilt trips him all over. Thankfully he didn't fall for that toxic manipulation. Can you imagine trying to break off with someone and because of that they tell you you're worse than sexual assailant…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 08:35 AM
1

ah, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 08:13 AM
–

that's a real phenomenon
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 11:10 PM
–

you really sound like. makes me wonder how you end up here. PPD is the insane asylum of reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 11:09 PM
–

that's.... pretty accurate actually
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 11:04 PM
–

oh, i didn't realize she was trying to be one
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:58 PM
–

> she needs to deconstruct her idea of gender norms, obviously she's not required to do that, or anything. she can just divorce and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:37 PM
1

this really makes no sense to me (no offence). could you rephrase?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:00 PM
5

bro you're off base. "attractive" has multiple dimensions. she finds men attractive on physical dimension, but not personality/LTR dimension. you may want to re-read her messages she's being pretty clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:57 AM
2

<image> the height of insecurity lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:46 AM
1

indeed. doesnt align with preferences of modern people. well said
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:45 AM
5

<image> lol? bi-men really give women the ick don't they haha
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:42 AM
2

<image> so many fun stats
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:39 AM
2

<image> never trust a blond lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:34 AM
–

> It’s just much less common. i don't believe it. <image> So i'm going to revise your original comment from: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1sqas4h/comment/oh7lrsh/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button > I can’t think of anything more pathetic than a grown woman dating a young girl straight out of school. They claim it’s about physical attractiveness but it’s not, it’s that they don’t like the fact that older women have bounda…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 09:40 AM
–

> Yes men are much more likely to be predatory than lesbians. That’s not to say lesbians are never predatory, but it’s less common. nope, don't believe this. In any case, you're saying women predators are acceptable because they're (allegedly) less common? is that it? so we confirm you never cared about young women and keeping them safe from all predators regardless of gender, you just wanted to bash men specifically. otherwise you'd likewise be teaching young women being aware of women's ways (…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:59 AM
–

> Thankfully a lot of young women are increasingly aware of men’s ways. why are you making this gendered? to specifically attack men? your biases are clearly showing. my comment wasn't gendered. reread it. lesbian age gaps are common. pray tell how being "increasingly aware of men’s ways" is relevant there xD or are you saying that only hetero age gaps can be predatory (again male is the boogey man bias) and lesbians are not? (if so, do some more reading, the answer may surprise you) i guess les…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 11:58 PM
–

> Plenty of people 30+ at the clubs. not interested in "plenty". interested in age group of "most". 20s has the "most" club goers here. if you want to increase chances of finding a club goer, matching with 20s is most consistent with that strategy. > It's when these weird 40+ guys who are still virgins come on here bleating about wanting 18-25 year olds because they're "pure" and "not jaded" (because 35+ women don't want to sleep with 40+ year old virgins with weird complexes around sex) that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 11:45 PM
0

> And yet you say this but these "older men" never have those same standards of their own. why are you talking about older men? reread my comment. it was not gendered. i said older people and younger people. if you're still struggling, then assume it's older lesbian going after younger lesbian and try again. > They're just guys who wasted their primes who are now trying to relive glory days they never had with money by chasing younger women because the women their age aren't interested in them a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 07:12 AM
0

nice ad hominem and a bit of a no-true-scotsman too well done. you're free to believe w.e. you like. anyway, missing my point. > Nobody has to jump through hoops or meet some checklist except the guy she was never really attracted to in the first place. let me try again. what is attraction? when someone matches you. what is a match? that's when they meet your "checklist". as people get older they already "been there done that" and their list is long and more refined and uncompromising. they're n…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:11 PM
0

> Also, what you’re saying is that men date younger women bc they’re easier to manipulate into doing what men want. > Which is by definition predatory and thus you’re implying that men are predators. did i stutter lol? i don't think i could have made it any clearer, lemme try again with emphasis: "look this is nothing gendered, but young people are the open minded adventures blank canvases and thus easier to date and get along with. they go with the flow." No mention of men in there whatsoever. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:57 PM
1

well i define a need as something you will die without. water is a need. sexual release is not. sexual release is a want. a nice to have. you won't die without it. so i would say sexual release is a want for most and a need for no-one. but this all comes down to semantics. anyway i feel we're talking past each other because i think you're trying to get something else across. > I struggled with intrusive sexual thoughts and the only way to manage them was to masturbate. that kinda sounds like OCD…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:26 PM
1

> I do find it odd to purposefully choose a partner who doesn’t intellectually challenge you. to each their own. not everyone wants a challenge. some just like to chill. > But a lot of men don’t like a smart cultured woman, it makes them feel stupid and threatened. assumptions. > Women get smarter and more cultured with age, and that makes them more attractive. they might, but older women aren't automatically more attractive than younger in all dimensions. older people (not gendered) also tend t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 09:58 PM
-1

and a lot more baggage. set in their ways. look this is nothing gendered, but young people are the open minded adventures blank canvases and thus easier to date and get along with. they go with the flow. 35+ is coming in with laundry list of requirements and rigid deal breakers. one is not automatically better than the other. it depends what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 09:00 AM
1

glad we're on the same page (:
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:56 AM
0

> They claim it’s about physical attractiveness but it’s not ah good to know you can speak for men. > It’s the height of insecurity to surround yourself with people who don’t challenge you. getting young women are challenging. that's the point. only insecurity i see is older women feeling (rightfully) threatened by the younger more fertile women. it's basic biology. you can keep gaslighting as much as you want, but men aren't quite as dumb as you think (:
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:56 AM
0

physically sure. financially, status wise - which are things women prioritise - later on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:50 AM
1

> decorrupt themselves haha right. good luck with that!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:47 AM
1

> That's literally alleging there are women interested in him somewhere based on nothing. based on math and stats. 8 billion people. you can be the most niche person ever and still have millions of matches globally. problem is they are not concentrated in one spot. it's an challenge of discoverability - marketing. dating apps are ideally meant to solve that. if they worked properly, they would pair up 1s, 5s, 10s etc. right now it just caters to 5+ range and "normies" with generic traits. The <5…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:46 AM
1

ok. you can say it's a need for you based on your preferences perfectly defensible - but you can't make claims it's a need for everyone else. you may believe so, but you can't prove. "sex isn't a need for everyone. it may be a need for some based on their preferences." - if you're happy with this then we're in agreement (:
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:34 AM
0

> So again, why should I? didn't say you should anything. not once. you said: > Why would I want i asked: > why not? (want) you said: > painful or uncomfortable great. case closed. asked and answered. lol the downvotes. this sub needs to get over itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 11:26 PM
1

i find that hard to believe. men are fairly lookist so lot of ladies in <5 group getting ignored, mistreated, invisible. women were the OG incels after all. before men took over the space and made it the all important mens' problem™ assortative mating means 1s with 1s, 5s with 5s, 10s with 10s. a man with no options sounds to me like a man who's refusing to accept his true matches. or just too ignorant to realise who the true matches are. in the west. i will caveat that there are indeed doomed s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 11:05 PM
1

> did you slap up a bathroom selfie with an unkempt background? i've seen so many photofeeler photos from guys like this hahaha it should be a meme by now if it isn't
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:53 PM
2

> You will never really “win someone over” by wearing them down or “being persistent” so don’t try. if it does't work. why do they keep doing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:43 PM
1

a hundred too many i'd say
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:42 PM
3

> I'm more into casual you must have missed that part
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:26 PM
0

no. you didn't mention risk at all. that's the point. he said he's not interested in unnecessary medical procedures. you're response to that focused on the positives only. im providing the other side for a balanced take. i agree. mens' eyes should be opened - fully.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:55 PM
0

it's a medical procedure. not risk free. some men come away with life long permanent pain. imagine having orgasms be painful instead of pleasurable. sounds like fun? there are no free lunches out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:42 PM
2

> Also i will not touch that link. That url looks more than questionable and I won't deal with that. probs a good plan if you want to sleep tonight. > Men are weak and shouldn't be in charge of anything. If they cant even control themselves why would anyone trust them to control anything? perhaps
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:26 PM
3

you've described step 1 in the funnel. "swipe everyone to get max matches". they're not even looking who they swiping. step 2 in the funnel is they go through the matches and pick from those. they're picky in step 2, not in step 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:08 PM
1

<image> these "need vs want" convos never get anywhere because it all breaks down to semantics and everyone's subjective definitions of "essential", "important", "desirable" etc. "need" is a subjective term, define by other subjective terms. endless well of subjectivity. i think it's better to go beyond the term "need" and ask "what are the implications?" so let's say sex is a need. so what? what's the implication? what are you really trying to say by declaring sex as a need? i just ... don't kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:05 PM
1

100%
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:57 PM
1

sex is not a need for individual. may be need for a collective. someone has to produce babies. doesn't need to be everyone. food is also a need. yet we don't all need to be farmers though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 07:57 PM
1

as i said, that's the tip. here's what the rest of the iceberg looks like https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603102323#:~:text=Sexual%20torture%20and%20severe%20injuries or take a look at any history book where a nation is defeated by another and women are treated as spoils of war. like nazi germany -> russia and then russia -> nazi germany. that's what complete lack of control looks like, just for comparisons. im always impressed by women having 6th sense for this stuff and are scared of men. smart…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 07:54 PM
3

they are controlling it very well is my point. all you've seen out there is the tip of iceberg. just the tip ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 06:39 PM
0

reading these comments. all these women with their responsive drives. why god, why? why wasn't i born a gay man instead!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 06:37 PM
1

> If I'm ovulating just seeing any person can instantly trigger arousal for me where I'm imagining having sex with them. now extend that to 24/7/365 and you'll know what it's like to be a man (:
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 06:36 PM
1

> This is the equivalent of saying eating tasty food is boring now because the novelty wore off. it can be absolutely. It is to me. i eat because i have to. not because i enjoy it. despite food being delicious every day. If i didn't have to eat to survive, i wouldn't. it all goes back to hedonic treadmill https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill all you get is initial bump in joy initially and then it all flattens out eventually. no source of "happiness" is indefinitely sustainable. every…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 05:51 PM
0

what about adolescence? there are places in the world that have single sex schools. loads in the country im in.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 05:41 PM
1

how you reach that conclusion? it doesn't need to be bad for novelty to wear off. does this all this sound new. dead bedrooms. books written about the topic etc. Top Gun Maverick is a great movie. loved every minute. watched the whole thing multiple times. wouldn't want to see it a 100 times though... but i said to each their own. some minds can do same things over and over and still find value in repetition.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 05:40 PM
1

> It is completely weird, definitionally abnormal, to be a virgin at 30 regardless of gender. Idk what to tell you, sorry that cultural norms exist?? Lol again, is atheism abnormal and weird? "abnormal" and "weird" are subjective definitions randomly made up by people. what's "weird" today can be "normal" tomorrow and "weird" again day after that. e.g. abortion used to be more legal in the past, then it became illegal, now it's becoming more legal again. same story for homosexuality. what's the …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:49 PM
2

you can install grindr any time you like ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:37 PM
1

sex drive is actually in the oldest "lizzard part" of human brain too. that lizard is how men act on the inside when they see women. god damn spontaneous drive god damn it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:34 PM
1

^^
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:18 PM
1

fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:17 PM
1

> Nobody is a virgin in western culture for that long unless they’re undesirable to too picky. i dunno why you omit option 3: they don't care about relationships, they're just not bothered. Then perhaps at 30 they got interested and started pursuing relationships then. There doesn't need to be a bigger mystery or grand reason to it than that. > It’s exceptionally out of the norm to be a virgin at 30, it’s seen as weird for the vast majority of men. statistically it may be out of the norm, but th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:16 PM
-2

> Plenty of people pursue careers and have sex. Plenty of people take care of their ailing parents and have sex. Plenty of people “don’t find the right one” and have sex. and plenty of people don't. point is all you did is speculate. people aren't a monolith. everyone and their story is unique. you can think w.e. you like bro. it's a free country. but all you did was make a bunch of random assumptions about someone you know nothing about. i just hope you're not deluding yourself thinking you kno…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:09 PM
1

that's what the ladies are for (:
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:00 PM
2

male man lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:58 PM
2

a female woman lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:54 PM
1

so? nothing inherently wrong with that
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:52 PM
1

why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:49 PM
1

ah, so they're all delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:48 PM
1

<image> not me, i practice every day!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:46 PM
-2

all you did was take once piece of data "virgin at 30" and the extrapolated whole bunch of negative assumptions out of thin air. i can make up random stories too. - she's sexual, but had higher priorities (work / education / career) that took all her time so no time to date. turned 30, now she's established and shifted her interest full tilt into relationships. nothing to do with religion or social repercussions. was simply too busy and not any more. what's the issue there? - she's sexual, but h…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:45 PM
0

> If a woman is a virgin at 30 and unmarried, this should tell you that she is either unattractive to men, is not fit for a long-term relationship with men, or that she’s too picky which resulted in her rejecting any men she met from religious backgrounds where virginity until marriage is the norm. Resulting in her being unmarried. all speculation and 30 is random number. swap in 24 for 30 there.. what's the difference? there's a million reasons one may choose to be virgin for as along as they f…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:35 PM
5

yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:14 PM
-1

> And? your last line is neither here nor there and is unnecessarily gendered when it's not. that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:56 PM
-1

how come?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:42 PM
1

where's the BMI guy? this is for him lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjGrRzHSykg&t=461s
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:26 PM
0

yup
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:25 PM
1

it's a pretty good post OP. people are asking way too broad questions and getting broad answers and then getting Pikachu faced "why didn't this generic advice work for me individually and specifically??" lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:04 PM
1

> Lonely men are usually either ugly, socially inept, neuro atypical, or a mix of the things. Lonely women are usually either ugly, socially inept, neuro atypical, or a mix of the things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:56 PM
-3

> whatever category you’d place common sense in. that would be a category of "a fallacy". > What do you gain from pity fucking men you don’t want to fuck? what do you gain from pitying anyone, in any way?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:55 PM
0

two things can be true same time
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:53 PM
3

exactly!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:37 PM
5

same for those men. they're shooting out of their league too. perpetually blind to <5 women out there, kinda like women are perpetually blind to men shorter than them. everyone has blind spots
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:32 PM
3

all ragebait
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:29 PM
0

> I think men would also be turned off if a woman is a virgin at 30. you would think wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:27 PM
-10

> Why would I want to let a man use my body in any way for pity? why not? where in the universe does it say "thou shall not". was in the 10 commandments? i don't recall
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:23 PM
-12

> Forcing themselves to have sex despite no attraction would be an extremely unpleasant, borderline traumatic, experience. source? so all sex workers are traumatised? every single one without exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:21 PM
-2

how does anyone benefit from pitying some they're not attracted to? how does anyone benefit from pitying some at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:20 PM
–

> It's not that being single is better for everyone, or that being in a relationship is better for everyone too. It's neutral. a sign of true intelligence on this sub for once. <3
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:14 PM
–

> IMO “being single is so much better” is a psyop to keep men and women divided, and it works because people who can’t succeed romantically like it as a cope and it makes it easier for them to unapologetically hate the other gender. off the mark. it's not strictly better or worse. it's nothing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill doesn't matter if single or not. there's no permanent increase in levels of happiness being partnered. it's a wash. partnered you get higher highs, offset b…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:11 PM
–

based on what data? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill <image> nothing is better than the other long term. people constantly adjust to the reality they are in.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:07 PM
–

why you so triggered bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:00 PM
0

I know and im agreeing with you. post is debating whether it's a "need". we both agree it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:42 AM
2

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:16 AM
1

define a "need" vs a "want" please.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:22 AM
2

need for collective =/= need for individual continuation of the species also needs food, not all of us need to be farmers. likewise not all of us need to be reproducers. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1spd039/comment/oh1oav7/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:19 AM
1

there you go. want. it's not a need. you're not gonna die from lack of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:17 AM
1

is god real too? billions believe so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:16 AM
3

> Sexual reproduction is a need for the survival of the species yes. a need for collective, that does not mean it's a need for an individual. society cares about babies produced. doesn't care who is producing them, as long as someone is producing them. society doesn't need every individual reproducing, just someone. society also as a collective needs food to survive, but it doesn't need every individual to be a farmer! responsibilities are delegated. some are farmers. some are reproducers. not e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:16 AM
3

<3 yas! all this tail chasing is so pathetic. it's for small minded men who don't have IQ for something bit more substantial in their lives. i've no more respect for someone with 100 n count than someone with 0. Isaac Newton and Nikola Tesla are far more impressive to me. They did stuff that's still recognised today. Does anyone remember chads who bagged 100s women from say 300 years ago? Any names? like, nobody cares bro. "uh a i banged a woman bro", yeah so did billions of other humans before …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:10 AM
0

> SEX IS FUCKING AWESOME it's alright maybe the first time it's amazing. after that, do it a couple hundred times and you'll get bored of the concept. the novelty is entirely gone. unless you're the sort who enjoys doing the same thing over and over and over again. to each their own etc. but i don't get how people can watch the same movie they've seen a hundred times and know how it ends. As you get older, sometimes the ending is not even guaranteed, the recording gets blurry, the quality drops.…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:03 AM
2

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:55 AM
3

that's it? shocking! <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:50 AM
2

which prejudices can you see more clearly now?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:44 AM
1

bangmaid deliver to your room?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:42 AM
1

he's got a good wingman with madd skillz
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:41 AM
2

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:40 AM
1

what in the?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:37 AM
2

be the person you want to attract.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:36 AM
1

alright ladies here's your bear. go enjoy! the men will wait right here ^^
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 10:56 PM
1

> casual sex workaround that would be one helluva an expensive work around
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 10:50 PM
2

there was no point in life at all
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 10:49 PM
0

it means everything is priced in. in a free market, people negotiate their price. the price you get is based on all possible variables considered: the service rendered / goods sold, supply & demand, negotiating power etc. > In this case can't we say that the market price is what it is at because the women involved in the process of selling that service/product are paid less than they should be? in a free market, they're paid exactly what they should be based on their performance. "performance" i…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 06:01 PM
2

;)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:53 PM
1

<image> >too hungry and horny good thing you can solve both problems same time!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 12:44 PM
1

i don't think it does. why? because i believe in strong EMH, meaning everyone is paid exactly what they should be at all times, given all available information. Markets are efficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 12:42 PM
1

yeah this is it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 12:39 PM
3

i know im just messin :P
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 12:33 PM
2

oi! sharing is caring!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 12:28 PM
1

well of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:14 PM
1

> women only wear jeans to show off their ass to men of course they do. where's the evidence they dont?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:11 PM
1

i was about to say the same thing!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:10 PM
3

wow! where? asking for a friend
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:08 PM
1

they dont? :0
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:06 PM
7

> And the other isn’t. disagree. it's annoying as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 10:55 PM
1

that's rookie level bro. the pros hold the door for them, when they're far away, to force them to hurry to the door ;) closing it just before they get to the door is an option too - but that's too diabolical even for my tastes
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 10:36 PM
2

this is 1st order thinking. looks and personality are symptoms, not the root cause. root cause is patriarchy, that's 2nd order thinking. why do looks matter at all? because people been socialised so. why? because patriarchy. why are personalities so miss matching? because men and women are set against each other. why? because patriarchy. looks->socialisation->patriarchy. personalities->gender apartheid->patriarchy. 0->1->2 follow the chain
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 08:03 AM
–

<image> ladies choose the bear, but it's popular with the gents too
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:51 PM
2

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:14 PM
5

uhm that's the point. it is an anonymous forum! there's no consequence so what's the problem? would you rather he made a non-anonymous facebook post about it? lol people are posting personal stuff here all the time. that's a feature of reddit, not a bug.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 08:56 AM
9

> Freedom brings loneliness when suddenly you're no longer surrounded by hundreds or thousands of single people your age every day in high school and college, and every adult has different schedules. nail on the head exactly. there's research out there confirming same. fundamental issue is time and proximity. you need a lot of time and proximity to build connections. high schoolers and college students have both in abundance (and common interests). connections form with almost no real effort. ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 08:52 AM
5

> As far as meeting people like that, it feels like they are 1 in a thousand (or more) and pretty much impossible to find. the math sounds broadly right. true compatibility is indeed rare and difficult to find. doesn't help that Tinder gives all 5 words to express yourself in the bio and a few pictures. ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 08:45 AM
3

being heterosexual is the biggest hinderance. gays are having a blast. lesbians are having a blast. it's men and women that can't get along. why? patriarchy. anything more specific than that is just symptoms of the root cause. the root cause is patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 08:06 AM
–

with the rate of men getting vasectomies out there these days he may very well be soon
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:56 AM
2

call your husband? do you mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:57 PM
2

you mean this is the perfect diet for calorie counters surely. low cal, high nutrition. win win
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:56 PM
2

thanks for your inputs
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:36 PM
0

men sleep just fine. i heard women have more issues. i'd recommend more vitamin D...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:29 PM
1

<image> nutritious
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:27 PM
3

lol <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:23 PM
1

you're already there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:14 PM
2

and if you're at restaurant and not hungry for 3 course meal. you're gonna force feed yourself out of principle? or just have a snack.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:00 PM
3

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 10:39 PM
3

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 10:36 PM
1

im just gonna leave this here <image> some of the people i saw commenting on a recent post about being unhappy with their partner thinking of someone other than them or "can't grasp why would they think of someone other that me when masturbating" are in for surprise of how common this is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 10:00 PM
1

did you ever have a snack in your life? or you only prepare and eat a 3 course meal every time you sit down at the table?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:50 PM
2

lol did you ever have a snack in your life? or you only prepare and eat a 3 course meal every time you sit down at the table?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:46 PM
2

> Hentai gets a bed rep because a lot of it depicts child sized bodies, and it also lets me know the guy (or woman) is some weeaboo or otaku or some shit. And as an Asian woman, no thank you. so you've strong opinions on it. > Mostly I just don’t want to know about my man’s porn habits. but you don't wanna know about it? don't you want to dodge all the hentais? Also, totally unrelated but: > If he’s sick, I am open to servicing him without getting anything in return, and I’ve always been like th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:42 PM
3

all you've done is swapped one subjective term "cheating" for another subjective term "fidelity", both of which can be argued and lawyered lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:37 PM
5

> is it cheating if I send pics of my naked body to a random man online? only if there's no prior agreement with your partner. > it's cheating for men to seek out images of naked women online. only if there's no prior agreement with your partner. nothing is inherently cheating or not cheating. there's just an agreement and it's either broken or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:34 PM
2

> Yes, most people are like this, and you see the majority of relationships/marriages end up in break ups, divorces, cheating or dead bedrooms. that's speculation. these outcomes are weighted sum of a million contributing variables. if you're point to lack of hobbies as most significant one, you'll have to provide some evidence of this other than vibes. it may be true for your relationships, but you're not other people. you can't speak for them. not everyone is a novelty seeker.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:10 PM
5

being "individual" isn't inherently more interesting than being like everyone else. does't matter if you have a million hobbies and a million stories. if someone doesn't find any of those to overlap with their own, there's no inherent interest from their side. if your interests are ABC and her interest are XYZ - unless she cares to learn about ABC (which there's no requirement to do so), then it's no more benefit than having no interests at all. what matters is finding a match, compatibility. be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:09 PM
2

being able to manipulate and fool is a social skill. socialising and social skills are related but not the same. which is why this statemtent: > you certainly don't have good social skills if people don't like socialising with you. is fundamentally incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:59 AM
1

hear hear!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:55 AM
0

it's not easy carrying the world on your shoulders you know... <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:03 PM
-1

<image> because men are in charge
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:47 PM
0

uuhhm... nothing. carry on (:
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:39 PM
–

"disgusting, absolutely disgusting, the audacity! he's not even 6 foot! the absolute cheek! you know what im gonna do, im gonna whip out my phone and film this shit right here. Straight to social media! #MeToo buddy, #MeToo. Oh and of course im gonna be pressing charges for sexual harassment! Straight to jail, right away!" - women, probably
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:37 PM
8

it's ok, you can be the woman im looking for. that will do (:
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:54 PM
0

that's straight up sexism haha
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:49 PM
5

the world needs more women like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 06:23 PM
9

sounds good, lets do it <3
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 06:21 PM
6

> I’d feel pathetic chasing a man. why?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 06:19 PM
1

oh shit you actually edited your comment XD bro i don't wanna mislead you! i said i don't know if they are commodities... but they might be... <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:09 PM
-3

> If 90% of men never get laid humanity as a species will still be fine it might be yeah. there's neither here nor there though. sex is still a resource (:
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:04 PM
2

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:00 PM
2

ok. we're getting into semantics then. > I am more interested in whether the thing can be stockpiled, distributed, or even measured and compared objectively by an external third party. a resource doesn't need to comply with above to be a "resource". definition of resource is anything that provides value, utility, or advantage. you narrower scoping there is more about commodities - a subtype of resource. whether sex/relationships/dating/romance are commodities is a separate question im not gonna …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:48 PM
-2

> Sex is not a resource it is. don't take my word for it. google it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:39 PM
2

it's necessary for survival of the species, no necessarily individual. still a resource yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:37 PM
-5

> sex/relationships/dating/romance aren't resources yes they are. bro never heard of Social Exchange Theory
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:35 PM
2

OP is absolutely pulling it out of his ass
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 02:11 PM
3

you're right, it's not socializing. but it is a social skill. that's the point. socialising and social skills are related but not the same. which is why this statemtent: > you certainly don't have good social skills if people don't like socialising with you. is fundamentally incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:53 PM
2

> just look at where their dicks ... are pointing at hahaha i love this line
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:42 PM
2

so that's your excuse to downplay his poor experience of his circumcision gone wrong? > He was trying to equate it to a clitoroidectomy that's a blunder on his part and i don't support that either. but i wouldn't use that as an excuse to try attack and invalidate his claims of having a personal poor outcome in his circumcision.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:39 PM
2

ok so in conclusion, neither of us are experts. i think we should leave it at that (:
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:16 PM
2

so someone with zero social skill can become POTUS? or how much is needed?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:13 PM
1

indeed (:
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:11 PM
3

and many of his voters. he didn't buy the votes. he used social skills to convince enough people to vote for him. winning a free democratic election is imo the definition of heaving peak social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:01 PM
0

> Having good social skills means people usually react well to you. that's a very important key word. usually =/= always. that's a fair argument. but the issue is now defining the threshold of "usually" - which is subjective and will never have the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:59 AM
5

solid argument. well im convinced!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:52 AM
1

> We all know men of all ages want young women, yet do these young women want older men back? Nope Look around next time you go outside - do you see many 18yr olds dating guys in their mid to late 30's?.... The best source of information is what happens in the dating pool in real life, and we see that large age gaps are not the norm. why does it need to be "many" to count? there's not many gay couples i see on the streets either. will you deny their existence as well? they're not the "norm" eith…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:47 AM
-3

vibes
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:37 AM
1

sorry that's too cryptic. im not american. could you elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:36 AM
-5

> That shows his looks and social skills are not working. no it doesn't. there's a million variables that contribute to outcomes. i don't know him that much but looks like he had a gf anyway. all this beside the point i was making. Hallo effect is real and documented. social perceptions are coloured by that. it's all subjective. if you find them attractive you will excuse away their blunders and find alternative explanations. if you don't find them attractive you will attribute blunders to their…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:34 AM
-6

thanks for your personal input, but women are not a monolith. you don't find attractive doesn't mean nobody does.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:46 AM
1

no way do you think all you need is arrogance and money to win a presidency. seriously?? then why democrats just not throw more money at the problem? are they too poor?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:45 AM
4

men just have wider spread of social ability. women have a narrow boring range of "acceptable" behaviours and discards the rest as "bad". that's how nature constructed it. men are T driven risk takers and push envelopes. women are programmed to be co-operative "lets not rock the boat" glue that tries to keep things in the middle of the bell curve. i understand from nature pov how the middle is broadly "safer" generally, but outliers are needed to make progress and change status quo too, which is…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:42 AM
-4

nonsense. plenty of people would not like to socialise with Trump, but you don't become as powerful as he did in business and becoming POTUS without social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:33 AM
-2

and you don't understand halo effect. two people, one pretty and one ugly can say the exact same words and have people interpret them positively or negatively. nothing to do with the words (social skill), everything to do with appearance and biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:32 AM
1

> Having good social skills is indicated by people actually liking to interact with you. if that's the metric then every president ever has bad social skills since 50% of population don't like him. i.e. silly metric. you're not in control of how people react and everyone reacts different.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:28 AM
2

i'm only interested in why you're trying to downplay OP's lived experience of circumcision gone wrong by throwing examples at him of other men who were ok - as if that makes any difference to him, or you're trying to persuade us that he's a liar?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:30 AM
2

no, this is from finding spouse pov. your 100 people group did not have the spouse-to-be. where do you go next?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:51 PM
2

how will they know it's "sleeping around" vs "dated for a while and it didn't work out"? only difference is whether they are taking charitable view or uncharitable view. which can shift quickly if you had recent falling-out. or someone gets jealous and starts spreading rumours. so you're at the mercy of subjective judgements of other people. seems dodgy no? cold approach has the advantage of clean slate. no biases. no outside influence. if it don't work out, easy to break off. no mess. no friend…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:49 PM
4

> I doubt it'll happen anytime soon though. yeah. this is it. could be another 1000 years still. slavery persisted for thousands of years. im sure there was more than one Abraham Lincoln in history, but if it's not the time yet... it's not the time. > Something that's bugged me about heterosexual dating discourse is that no matter how progressive the space is, everyone is arguing within patriarchy. i've honestly had these exact thoughts recently! like was tempted to make a post just titled: "jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:36 PM
3

i don't mean messing up the friend group. i mean friend group is limited pool. you can't maintain close relations with more than 100 people or so. if there's no match in the group, then what? where do you go next?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:27 PM
2

and if there is no person in the group that matches you, then what? geez
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:25 PM
11

this. 100%. full points. gold star. let's cut the "who does what" gendered shit and speed run to an egalitarian society please. or continue to suffer the stink of patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:08 PM
2

> Only try to date within my circle of friends and social group how do you deal with that being a finite pool that's exhausted fast?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:56 PM
4

> In fact 90% of the issues in this sub could be solved by just communicating like adults but everyone is socially stunted yeah it's reddit. natural self selection for the terminally online
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:55 PM
6

> Removing the clitoris is akin to removing the entire head of the penis. Do you think it’s reasonable to equate circumcision to that? im not interested in that claim, but to ans your question, no i don't equate them. im only interested in this: > It’s more than anecdotal. Jewish and Muslim men don’t report total loss of sexual sensation. so you are making a claim that all circumcisions have identical outcomes? because that is trivial to disprove. if you're just sharing anecdotes that "some men …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 04:15 PM
9

So just calling OP a liar. your anecdotes don't invalidate his anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 03:25 PM
1

this is why i don't like humans
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 03:18 PM
1

> If you legitemately believe that there is simply no way to reasonably predict whether any given course of action or choice is going to result in a positive or negative outcome, then there is simply no point in talking with you about anything. you said: > That's like saying there is absolutely no way to know no, you can't know. know = certainty. nothing is certain. everything is probabilistic. > If you legitemately believe that there is simply no way to reasonably predict you're changing the st…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:36 AM
0

> That's like saying there is absolutely no way to know that your feminist dance therapy degree was a bad investment before you spent 4 years in college. indeed. there isn't. > People aren't unknowable. they are. even if you could know them 100% at this moment, they will be different person a moment later. nothing is static. > Pick better is not blaming them in retrospect. It's telling people to pick better now. The post is in the past tense. “Those women should have picked better”. > People rar…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:52 PM
1

> it's predatory because you are purposely going after a partner much younger then you, not because you like them, but because of their age/power dynamics involved so no data then still? or is the claim that all age gaps are inherently predatory. all of them. just because they are age gaps? because 1: that's provably not true. 2: you can make that argument about anything. by that metric all romantic relationships are predatory because men are purposely going after women who are shorter and weake…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:28 PM
–

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:15 PM
1

> Then she just doesn't like you different people have different preferences and turn ons.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:13 PM
–

im not paid enough to do this
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:11 PM
2

liking and desire are not the same. she can like you, but doesn't get turned on till you do XYZ. two separate pathways to arousal. > I think it's woo woo nonsense do you treat all research like that? why you bother with modern medicine or going to doctors then. sure it's all based on statistics which you think is woo woo nonsense lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 11:54 AM
2

> Do you think that women have responsive desire? research shows somewhere between 50-80% of women having responsive desire. depending on sources at least 20% or so will be spontaneous. men are basically reversal of the above. edit: i suspect this may relate to tinder demographics. if 20% women spontaneous and 80% of men being same, then Tinder having 20% women and 80% men population may not be coincidence - for a hook / picture based app, where spontaneous desire is kinda the driver.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 11:52 AM
–

my secret psyop to gaslight women into dating short kings has not gained traction. sorry kings, mission failed. we'll get em next time!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 11:38 AM
–

yes and i'm talking about women going after "6 foot big guys" not 6 foot skinny guys. specifically. tall. muscular. large dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:58 AM
0

i dunno anything about Will Smith. > Thinking that "pick better" means "pick me" is dishonest. it's useless advice. "pick better" is meaningless. it implies ability to see the future and/or be mind reader. people can't do either. relationship is a risk. everything is changing constantly. a person can date someone today who looks perfect on paper. then 10 years later they change and cheat on them. telling them to pick better is nonsensical - they can't see the future. likewise a person can date t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:55 AM
–

be that as it may, a shorter guy is still weaker than a taller one do you agree? do you not feel any more safer with a shorter guy than with a taller one then? if i see 2 guys on the street, one shorter than me, another taller than me and i have to fight one of them, of course im gonna pick the shorter one (even if i expect to loose against both). like it's basic logic. it's not about damage elimination, but damage reduction/mitigation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:33 AM
–

you have? and what they say?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:28 AM
0

"women should have picked better" is a victim blaming PSYOP by romantically challenged men who want women to essentially pick them instead. men making such arguments are essentially not smart to see that women will be smart enough to see through them. so they will continue to try in vain to gaslight them into picking "better" - i.e. them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 11:01 PM
3

that's easy to tell. you either like dead fish or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 10:54 PM
–

by re-educating them at the re-education camps of course, mein fuhrer.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 10:38 PM
1

> arguing about anything and everything just to stir up drama but it is a debate sub. that's kinda the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:50 PM
1

i guess i haven't been here long enough
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:49 PM
1

thanks for those sources and happy to acknowledge, but i was specifically asking for source on this: > large age gap relationships are generally predatory and bad for the younger partner and any kids brought into it because i was debating someone else here and she failed to provide evidence of same. > Lifestyle, energy and cultural differences. Like my mom wanted to go places and do things, stay our longer, have friends her age, talk about things relevant to her age group while my dad didn't get…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:48 PM
1

yeah. although that will be changing in future. it's about 50% atm and reddit wants to grow international many multiples.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:25 PM
1

hmm i dunno which people you refer to. most seem to have consistent positions
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:22 PM
1

ok fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:06 PM
2

> (do the conversion to american units or something) im in EU so don't worry, we use sane units here. (ya you heard me americans.)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:04 PM
1

hmm. that feels a bit goomba fallacy. there are risk taker women out there and there are risk averse women out there. i haven't seen them to be the same person in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:02 PM
3

> Even a 14yo boy can take down a grown adult woman. be that as it may, there's still less damage 14yo will do compared to 6 foot big guy in absolute terms. it's not about a binary switch of "risk at 6 foot and no risk with small guy" it's about risk reduction. small guys isn't "safe", he's "safer". > Also there aren’t enough short guys and skinny guys for all women. true. but from the ones who are there right now, they are not getting any attention (: so plenty to go around for the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:00 PM
1

yeah i was doing bit of googling there and that rings true now..
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 08:54 PM
3

that's the way <3 but that was for women who still want to date though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 08:51 PM
3

is that true? (checks google.) well ... shit. <image> didn't know gap was that big. i don't get it, they don't look that weak?? i would have guessed gap was maybe 20% diff at most.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 08:47 PM
2

> Just because someone is smaller doesn't mean they can't still try or even still succeed. sure but odds of success lowers. thought experiment. picture society where women are taller and bigger than men. so reverse image of what we have now. do you believe there will be absolutely zero reduction in violence from men to women? so relative sizes have absolute zero bearing on rate of attempts and success of assaults from men to women? i find it difficult to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 07:15 PM
2

and he can be weaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 07:04 PM
2

that's your opinion and i disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 06:55 PM
1

don't sit on train tracks, a train may run you over. don't date bigger guys, a bigger guy may "run you over" (overpower/assault/kill). i think it's comparable. meanwhile sitting on bicycle lane, risks weaker collision. dating smaller guy, risks less damage. i think it's pretty comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:44 PM
2

"depends" ok so so you cede dating smaller man will matter in some cases and thus will result in net reduction of assaults attempt and/or success at the population level. yes or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:41 PM
4

im asking for rationality. a persoan sits on train tracks. "you know maybe try not doing that?" - me. then gets run over by a train. do we blame the train? was i victim blaming there?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:39 PM
2

so you're telling me with a straight face that size of assailant has absolutely zero bearing on the outcome?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:30 PM
1

> Height or muscles do not correlate with SA rates. not with the rates, but with the extend of the damage that can be done. it's pretty basic logic that the bigger the opponent, the less damage they will take on average. so be the bigger opponent. less chance to be overpowered. like it's obvious isn't it? right? it's not about damage avoidance, but damage reduction and disincentivising trying something.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 04:30 PM
2

when you though it was bad, it can always get worse lol im sorry that happened
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 03:48 PM
3

i've never seen so much terse eloquently wisdom! Edit: since wolf of wallstreet that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 03:45 PM
3

so anywhere there's patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 03:38 PM
5

women are worried about being assaulted by men on dates? ok, here's a solution. date shorter men than you. skinnier men than you. you know, ones you can actually beat up if needed by height and size alone. women complain about being scared of men, yet actively seek out 6 foot big guys then complain about assault risks. you've put yourself at a physical disadvantage by your own dating choices ladies. make it make sense please.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 03:25 PM
3

which ones? asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 03:13 PM
1

> large age gap relationships are generally predatory and bad for the younger partner and any kids brought into it any sources on "generally"? if we're just swapping anecdotes i can tell stories how the older partners are exploited. knew a young woman who went abroad, got a job and preferential treatment etc. because she was in age gap relationships with the manager there. once she made enough money to buy property back home, she left and dropped him like it's nothing. back home found a new bf h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:11 AM
1

which one is what? im not following
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:44 PM
–

is that vegan?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:12 PM
–

a non vegan dish? hmm...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:12 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:11 PM
–

sure
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 08:25 PM
1

well if it's not "all men" there's no problem then.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 08:25 PM
0

> Older women warn younger women because they’ve been those younger women. It's not that difficult to grasp. that's just treating men as monolith. "all older men are evil" is that it? just because some younger women got burned doesn't mean they all did or all will. by that logic any women who dated any man ever can likewise say to stay away from all men just because she had rotten luck with it. age gap is just age gap. whether relationship works out is based on dumb luck, not age.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:40 PM
–

ok ok. pick any 2 you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:35 PM
–

i know it's so hard to decide when you want them all equally
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:34 PM
1

hear hear
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:33 PM
–

yee yee ass
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:32 PM
–

if you say so
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:31 PM
–

bear minimum. gotta be taller than the bear, or she choose the bear!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:31 PM
–

why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:30 PM
1

> yet you've all made entire movements to shame women for that. oi! bit of a goomba assumption there. I've no problems with women pursuing men with most resources. it's perfectly rational to do so. more power to them! im all for it!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:34 PM
–

<image> ladies.. Q4W: you have pick one. which one?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:31 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:26 PM
–

> How do people expect anyone to continue after that? they don't. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:24 PM
–

depends on kinks people have. sibling stuff is all over porn
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:08 PM
1

well put
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:06 PM
2

indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:41 PM
6

sorry i don't get it. > I found age gap relationships creepy when I was younger. you already didn't like when you were young. are you saying you went against your own preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:35 PM
1

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:31 PM
1

no problems with that at all! education is useful. but that's not what we're seeing. we're not seeing: "he honey, i see your bf is 10 years older. lets talk about risks so you're safe" that's caring advice. that's trying to make sure everyone is safe without interfering with the relationships. assuming innocent till proven guilty. rather we see: "your bf 10 years older?? that's creepy, he's digusting, are you insane?" that's manipulation. that's not advice, that's framing things, in a certain aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:18 PM
8

> I found age gap relationships creepy when I was younger. Especially after being in one, I found it extra creepy. why were you in one then?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:08 PM
–

> Honestly queen if he isn't 12' + is that even a man? i would say not! where are these good old men gone? here's one standing next to a midget <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:52 PM
–

sure. that's possible. not gauranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:49 PM
–

> Idc about dating people who move at a different speed than me... neither do it. that's the point. you find a person who matches your speed. if I date someone and she wants to take it slow - it means we're not a match. what it doesn't mean, or doesn't prove, is that she's not into me. that's entirely different claim and the one your post makes and i said you can't prove it!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:46 PM
-6

> Staying fixated on 18 year olds as you age is what people find creepy. subjective. women at their peak reproductive capability (20s +/-) are most attractive to men because biology. using subjective language like "creepy" is just gatekeeping attempt to manipulate the dating markets. > protecting those young women is just pretence. did they ask to be protected? i think people meddle in others business too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:38 PM
–

of course. after all, good men are 6'6+ she had to make due with what she got. 6'5 is lucky he even had the chance. giving half his money away is bare minimum entry price at that point like. fair is fair. she has to be compensated somehow for ignoring her standards and settling for a short king.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:21 PM
–

and why is that? did you look into it? i invite you to look into it (:
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:23 AM
–

> Women who are into you don’t make you wait long for physical intimacy or different people move at different speeds. this is not an ad hominem, but i feel from your post you must be early 20s. it's just a little game i like to play "guess the age based on post". you sound early 20s (:
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:08 AM
–

they basically want a Virgin Mary. have an n count, but somehow still virgin XD
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:03 AM
1

> Men are not doing all that because it is some amazing deal, they are doing it because that is how the dating market currently works. so, appeasement? > If men just “value themselves more” and opt out, nothing improves, they just end up with no results. they end up with self respect. if women collectively start demanding for men to crawl on their knees, lick their boots and give up all their cash before they even allowed to look in their direction - your response is "we have no choice, that's t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:50 AM
–

<image> i don't have OCD but even im triggered that red is blue and blue is red and all the other colors, like for feck sake
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:47 PM
–

found it: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1gbz24w/ppd_survey_results/
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:45 PM
–

really? lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:43 PM
–

how can you have objective understanding of something as subject? everything is filtered through subjective perception!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:42 PM
1

i wouldn't assume one way or the other. everyone is different. different sensitivities. some are sensitive, some are numb.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:38 PM
–

> The insatiable desire to tell people theyre wrong on the internet right but you're wrong about people being wrong, since everything is subjective anyway (:
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:35 PM
–

in the end we're just here to pass the time till we kick the bucket
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:33 PM
–

that too
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:30 PM
–

yeah it's all fun and games.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:29 PM
3

ok (: it just wasn't clear if you were shocked in good way or bad way lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:28 PM
–

r/AskMen ?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:26 PM
–

> according to the last survey could you link that please? i dunno how to find it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:24 PM
1

realest answer so far!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:14 PM
4

i really don't get men. they have to be dancing bears to get a woman and then dancing bears in the bedroom too. what, to just get a nut? masturbation is far better use of time. why can't men start valuing themselves more as people first and foremost, rather than acting as womens' servants all the time, enslaved by their sex drives. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:13 PM
3

so.... did it work?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 09:52 PM
1

we'll never know. it's invisible
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 09:38 PM
0

<image> mens protection racket
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 09:36 PM
1

hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 09:05 PM
–

same thing. philosophy doesn't exist outside reality
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:08 PM
–

im not gonna get into philosophy here, it's out of scope. i just gave you the conclusion. if you wanna learn more, have read of nihilism. but to answer your question. your question is already presuming objective categories and metrics - none of which are justified. the question has no inherent meaning, any answer is a projection of human frameworks - which are subjective constructs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:56 PM
1

"80% of statistics are made up" - Einstein "don't believe everything you see on the internet" - Abraham Lincoln
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:38 PM
6

so ... 0.625% of the global population. and what's the demographic? are all the worlds countries on it? not to mention it's mostly single people. those in relationships (most of the rest of the world) aren't on the apps or this subreddit. i wonder how they doing... i guess we'll never know. we'll be forever stuck analysing data of those who, for one reason or another, are still single (:
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:36 PM
–

objectivity doesn't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:30 PM
7

internet in the nutshell. after all if leftists went to Cuba, what are they gonna whine about then? nothing? can't have that now!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:20 AM
2

> Women also have to take care of their safety maybe that's why they don't want to engage with it so much. > And bad stuff isn't just your normal ghosting after a date it's just worse stuff women have to keep in mind. That's why women prefer dating men they know about than dating random strangers. wait are you just thinking solely from cold approach POV? of course women can warm approach. doesn't need to be cold approach. just approach in w.e. you find most comfortable. cold. warm. bold. safe. e…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:41 PM
–

ok im convinced (: also i was being lazy (: > If you think this actually scales beyond a niche, then argue that. well i can't see the future. but it's possible. currently it's "crappy products for crappy customers" (innovators dilemma) right now those dolls are crappy "products" compared to real women sold to "crappy customers". the reason they sell at all is because of different value proposition, not necessarily better value proposition - compared to sex with real woman. over time, business in…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:31 PM
–

<image> short king for the ladies out there. srs though who's buying a 5'3 dude wtf??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:49 PM
–

ok im watching the vid. bot in the vid is 11k and AI chat feature costs 40 monthly.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:46 PM
–

oof
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:38 PM
–

hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:36 PM
–

i saw this more than once here and i don't get these "rich" comments at all? i just did a quick google and these dolls are 2k - 4k. what am i missing?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:34 PM
–

> Let’s stop pretending that sex robots are going to change anything. RealDoll’s been around since 1997, and robotic versions showed up around 2010. These things are expensive, awkward to own, and come with upkeep people love to ignore. This isn’t some market-sweeping revolution, it’s a niche product that’s already been here for almost 20 years and nothing’s changed. if you don't care, why expend all this effort highlighting negatives then? no time spent on the positives. the one sided bias seem…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:13 PM
–

both men and women objectify women https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-brains-see-men-as-whole-women-as-parts/ also men brains are more interesting in things, women brains are more interested in people. so something that a lot of women will not get (because your brains aren't wired this way) is that a lot of men will go for this stuff in the future as it becomes cheaper and more widespread. which is great, will solve a lot of problems. everyone should be on board with this (:
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:06 PM
–

> So if anything, they’d be doing women a favour. so it's a win win. women should be rooting for this stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:39 PM
–

they need to be advanced enough to clean themselves. long term they will be. till then, i guess we'll make do with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:37 PM
–

no idea what redpill is exactly, but Buddhism is deffo G my man! you don't want to be slave to clings if you want equanimity, a true peace of mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:34 PM
–

all fun and games till AGI comes and all of a sudden bots have "rights" and now you need consent to have sex with them and we're all back to square one...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:30 PM
–

so WW4 is gonna be men vs women. not even Einstein saw that one cuming
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:28 PM
–

the bots will of course
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:27 PM
1

> Men are visual creatures and they suffer because of that exactly because the attractive girls just use them men are not a monolith
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:21 PM
1

so in the history of mankind, there has never been a case where a woman approached first and found a great guy she was happy with ever after? because unless that's what you're saying, all you really said is: "bad stuff might happen" yeah sure. my counter: "good stuff might happen too". (and provably has)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:20 PM
1

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:01 PM
1

I dunno why you're asking me, might wanna direct that to Financial_Leave4411
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:55 PM
1

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:53 PM
1

didn't say there was.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:44 PM
1

> Society and a shit ton of men online and irl say it’s not possible. of course it's possible. i can't tell how probable though. odds are against you. it's a niche. but possible. my uncle is ex military. lean. strong. muscular. he's into bigger women. they had a daughter, my cousin. she's beautiful. voluptuous parts of her mother plus lean frame of her father. > even the tiny amount of men who are into bigger women have to deal with the stigma and shame of liking someone like me. well, that's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:12 PM
5

> I’m a fat woman who has initiated. I've heard BMI challenged women complain even harder and be even less trusting of any guy approaching them -because they assume even more he just want's easy lay. So you won't trust the guys who approach you and you won't trust the guys you approach. ... i think you're otta options there ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:43 AM
2

> meanwhile he doesn’t remotely like her as a person she can figure this after her approach, with subsequent interaction. > he’ll say yes just for the novelty or because he’s worried he won’t get laid see that's a chicken and the egg problem. that may be more the case currently because of the current dynamic. but if you have a world where men and women are approaching in equal measure, that issue goes away. men will be more incentivised to say no and be honest about intentions, precisely because…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:37 AM
1

agree with you broadly, ill just add to this > opposites attract research shows (and im too lazy to find it sorry!) that it's not as simple as it seems. opposites attract initially, because of high novelty - they are opposites! that's the allure. but long term it's more like to fall apart because opposites... well they are opposite, they won't see eye to eye as much. so it's good for short term, not so great for long term. so a counter to > In this dynamic he would do lots of heavy risk taking a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:32 AM
2

if woman is approaching and making her intent clear it's not just a casual hook up, how could she be used for sex? she just has an interest and approached. the guy may just gonna lie to get sex sure. but well reverse the situation, guy approaches first and lies to get sex. what has changed? nothing. who approaches who is irrelevant to the outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:00 AM
1

no im not convinced by that. i mean sure when it comes to interest it may not be 50:50, but that's not what im talking about. im talking about that from the girls who are interested, not enough of them are approaching the men they want. then they complain "where did all the good men go?", "id rather have the bear, there's no one to date out there". well yeah, men went to your competition... cause you just stood by and let it happen. literally. it's so ironic you don't want to be objectified - ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:56 AM
3

those are gonna be factors too for sure
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:47 AM
8

> if they're the one doing the courting you can sense wants easier than when you do it yourself how's that? im curious. if you don't mind expand on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:19 AM
1

this doesn't make any sense. if guy and girl are interested in each other it's irrelevant who approached who first. so no reason to bias one way or the other. easier to get what? you, the girl, want that guy. that's what you want - so you approach. yeah, it's making it easier to get what you want - which is him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:11 AM
1

> if she approaches a hot guy herself either he'll reject her or use her for sex and pump and dump her. not a guarantee. > if he's truly interested in her he'll approach himself since he like her. also not a guarantee. he could be looking for easy lay that's less work than other hottie... > where they have to filter men by seriousness to commit and not just interest in sex. being approached by a man is not in any shape or form a sign of seriousness or commitment. they could be just looking for c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:07 AM
4

women who approach will have an advantage. it's obvious. i don't get why women don't use that. i saw some mention as some kinda filter for "assertiveness" or "risk taking" or "leadership". lol. be the person you want to attract. you want assertive, be assertive. Why would assertive, risk taking leaders value someone else who's none of those qualities? Passive, weak. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:04 AM
4

her competition doesn't need to approach because they are hotter. that's the point. the hottest guy will got to them if not intercepted. so if she's happy with hottest guy going to her competition and she getting the leftovers - so be it. she had the chance to get the hottest guy, by approach, but pissed it away. so they get the partner they deserve (the leftovers)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:49 PM
13

> Men are known for saying yes to women’s approaches just to get sex so how can women trust men when men will lead them on? a man approach first is also trying to get sex. that's neither here nor there
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:39 PM
8

men they don't want will approach. the top guy she wants is going to her competition unless she literally gets in the path of that and approaches him first.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:35 PM
9

gender ratio really. it's simple supply and demand. it's also why college girls have more sex (give it up easier) because they know they have to compete more intensely for less guys and they know what the guys want... this was from some research i've seen (to lazy to find, don't ask). also there's a country somewhere (can't recall) where the ration of women:men on dating app is way higher. like 2:1 ? and as expected, guys are getting way more matches there. it's all supply demand. all it ever wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:33 PM
13

> this idea that women will cold approach men extremely directly is a fantasy that will never happen. then they will get the partners they deserve (or no-one, then complain about where the good men gone lol). where the good men gone is they went to the competition who was hotter and thus could afford being passive. you had your chance to intercept him by approach first, but you blew it. not every girl can afford just being passive or they're just laying the red carpet to their competition lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:28 PM
3

> Anyway, men would just complain about being approached by women they don't want if things were reversed sounds great lets do it!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:22 PM
4

> In nature, men would still approach us and compete against each other for us if this was a wild free for all im not sure about that. women are equally competing against each other to attract the best seed. if an average girl and super hot girl are next to each other, passively competing of "who looks better" - the average girl is gonna lose and the best seed guy will approach the hot girl. on the other hand if average girl approaches best seed guy first, she has the advantage, increases her od…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:20 PM
1

in this dating economy?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:34 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:33 PM
1

post asked why you date men, not why you don't date men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:26 PM
4

you're acting as if this wasn't done for thousands of years lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 09:59 PM
3

microtransactions. it's a dystopian hypothetical xD
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 09:58 PM
2

are you white in 2026? are you letting slavery slide? you know it still exists in the world today right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 09:56 PM
1

> And i somehow seem to end up with the women who are spontaneous. i guess you have to right. someone's gotta make a move
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:59 PM
3

i'd rather be ghosted a million times than assaulted once. i'm sorry that happened
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:20 AM
2

mate guarding isn't gendered. > control women sexually to ensure paternity so another plus point for being gay. no kids, no paternity to worry about. excellent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:06 AM
2

wow. so instead of taking accountability and apologising you're actually doubling down on the attack. lol. > bad sex! again subjective. there's no such things as "bad sex" only partners who don't match. > That’s not cool! you attacking my sexual preferences is what's not cool. > objectively better objectivity doesn't exist. read nihilism. > Like really dude? You’re inconvenienced by having a harder hard on and her being wetter? You’re inconvenienced by getting your dick sucked before sex? You’re…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:55 PM
4

we kinda don't have to imagine... we have gay guys. a collection of men with spontaneous desire. they report higher relationships satisfaction than hetero. it doesn't seem like they have the problems you've described.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:41 PM
2

> sex is as boring as in and out lol that's your subjective opinion and i disagree. > you hold a resentment that women aren’t satisfied with just an in and out i don't resent women. you're putting words in my mouth. I have a personal preference to how i like to have sexual relations. doesn't mean i resent anyone. doesn't follow. > you’re really outing yourself here as shit in bed you're outing yourself as being an asshole who attacks peoples' personal preferences just because they don't align wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:34 PM
1

thanks. what does promising in casual mean? how does one show that?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:53 PM
1

how are gay couples managing then i wonder? two responsive people together.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:50 PM
2

> But what do women reliably respond to? im not a woman how should i know xD from research, broadly speaking, resources. whether social (status, network), financial etc. there's no one thing. generally it's gonna be a mix of traits. height? the taller the better i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:46 PM
2

sadly
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:31 PM
4

> Right now it’s generally women who have to be worried about men and their spontaneous desire as it causes so many issues in general. see i don't get this at all. men are horn dogs yes, but as we established, women aren't spontaneous like that. so where's he gonna go? he's gonna be cock blocked by all other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:51 PM
5

if i can have sex with a man without all those extra steps, then yeah, by definition that is more convenient. i don't understand what you don't understand. e.g. If i go on grindr, match a dude. time and place? we bang. I knew a gay dude who went from virgin to 300 encounters in the first year of college through grindr. (no seriously he was asleep through all the lectures because of that... barely passed). like first guy he match on the app, they just met in campus public bathroom and did it ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:47 PM
7

that's not a problem though. because spontaneous desire means a replacement woman is easier to attract. men only worry because they already had to move mountains to attract just one. if attraction is easier, oneitis goes away. they wouldn't be clinging so hard anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:35 PM
5

for sure they are. i looked at some stats. the odds are like 20% of women spontaneous. men are spontaneous 80%. it would thus be simply easier to find spontaneous men. statistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:33 PM
1

please, i wanna know your opinion too (:
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:52 PM
6

i've only recently learned that most men are spontaneous, most women are responsive. god damn did everything start to make sense since then. and god damn is it annoying af and makes me wish i was born gay so i only had to deal with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:46 PM
3

most men are spontaneous, most women are responsive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:34 PM
1

I invite you to have a quick read about nihilism and you will understand very quickly where im coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:01 PM
0

you're not crazy. you're a unique individual with subjective preferences and a chosen definition of love. Sternberg has his own ideas. red pill, blue pill etc have their own. to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 03:29 PM
0

there isn't one. there's no objective definition of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 02:29 PM
3

> and there is no "best relationship" since every one is different with different dynamics that work for a couple and might not work for others. only real answer here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 02:28 PM
1

definition of love is subjective. it can be w.e. you want it to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 02:26 PM
1

> Maybe the incels and femcels need to get together was gonna say before i read that haha
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 02:21 PM
1

you're giving these "women" too much credit. women are people. people have IQ that exists on the bell curve. half of the population has bellow average intelligence. half of those people are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:25 AM
2

any kind of sex is ... sex. a virgin is someone who did not have sex. virgin is someone with zero STI risk, since they didn't have sex. if someone claims to be a virgin but has STIs (or does an act that exposed themselves to risk of such) - they are not a virgin to me. that's my definition of virginity. 100% purity. 100% STI free.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:22 AM
–

"abnormal" as in higher than average. sure. asked and answered. my question to you is why do you care? you said yourself > But why would I give up? there is no reason to give it up. if you it suits your preferences and goals. nowhere in the universe does it say "though shall masturabate X times a day and no more!" i feel it's like you're seeking some kinda validation? maybe? there's no inherent need for that either. if you're happy with your life, opinions of others on how you live your life are…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:15 AM
–

it's called Halo Effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect#Role_of_attractiveness:~:text=%5B47%5D-,Role%20of%20attractiveness,-%5Bedit%5D it's a bias and like all biases, it's not easy to no do it, even when you know it exists. i agree with you OP, but given the above, simply saying "don't do it" is not gonna be enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:22 PM
–

> but it ended up too close uhm > eventually led to us hooking up uhmmmm > eventually being in a 12 year relationship uhmm??? > odd considering neither of us thought of ourselves as anything but straight before that happened uhmmmm?!?!1 well that story escalated xD This is probably why men are socialised to be stoic and emotionless, unless they wanna end up on this path :P jk, i like this story.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:03 PM
1

> Are you trolling with some of the nonsense you are saying? that's your subjective opinion. > If you take unpaid pto at your job pto = paid time off. how do you take unpaid paid time off? im gonna assume you mean unpaid time off. so > If you take unpaid pto at your job, instead of working that week, did you miss out on income or no? If took time off work that would have paid me X and got paid for that time by my spouse an allowance that was 2X, then no. not only did i not miss out, i made more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:01 PM
0

if anything, the wrinkles add character
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:02 PM
1

of course it is possible for attraction to be about anything. > is that very unusual I guess compared to going for money? i've no idea. my comment was directly responding to the post's own content here (:
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:49 PM
2

Different life stages: why is that bad? Power imbalances, with lots of potential for financial abuse: potential =/= guarantee. every hetero relationship is a power imbalance where a man can overpower and assault the woman. so? No relatability: partially. The man can relate just fine, he's been there already. From woman's side, sure. Loss of physical attraction to an older partner (balding, erectile dysfunction, wrinkles, sagging skin, beer bellies aren’t attractive to young women): any guy like …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:27 PM
13

> The only real reason women date older is $$$$ so you just defeated your own argument. "bad" means they get nothing out of it. if they are willingly participating, not forced, not groomed, to get the money - then it's a fair deal. nothing "bad" about a fair deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:04 PM
1

> while dating apps suck the issue isn't with their optimization, it's that women aren't that interested in them. chicken and the egg. women aren't on it cause they suck. if they didn't suck more women be on it. Tinder (and now everything else Tinder has absorbed, Bumble, OKC etc.) are shallow picture apps with 50 word bio and casual sex intent. Women are mostly not interested in casual sex. That's why those apps aren't popular with most women. There needs to be a dating app that has an actual d…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:38 PM
1

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:32 PM
–

yes. insulting them over it and being homophobic about it - no.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:04 PM
5

<image> we're talking about women and their behaviour. you're raising a different issue about men and their behaviour. textbook whataboutism. > And you can disagree all you want, it's still true. no it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:01 PM
6

> Oh they're scrutinized! Well that un-assaults all those queer men. whataboutism. the topic is about women behaviour. stick to topic. > I mean, not really. It's just doing the usual red pill thing of finding any excuse to bash women without actually caring about the issue. your opinion and i disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:51 AM
7

what deflection? do you find a woman's biphobia acceptable yes or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:49 AM
6

whataboutism. male behaviour is not excuse for women behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:47 AM
6

your argument is i can be biphobic so long as im not threatening. cool!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:45 AM
9

he already said in the post. the mens' transgression are already scrutinised, the women's aren't. the post is raising awareness and question as to why that's acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:42 AM
1

so... a perfect match. to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:19 AM
1

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:41 AM
2

> what can we do? build better dating apps that actually work. no one needs to change anything. their match is out there. matching making is the issue, not attractiveness. your solution is basically "just become Brad Pitt bro, what's the problem?". the solution should be to fix match making, not try to fix people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:37 AM
2

of course. taught them valuable lessons. experience is valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:35 AM
3

no. most people are not wanted by most people, other than their partners. especially all the <5s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:34 AM
3

> I’m talking about the guys who NO ONE wants. such person does not exist. the mathematics of billions of people out there does not allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:32 AM
1

he's a manager who's delegating effectively. a force multiplier.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:37 AM
–

yes of course. i personally don't waste brain waves on those people though. i just do w.e. (:
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:37 PM
–

take chill pill. i dunno where this rant is coming from. putting bunch of words in my mouth and making assumptions lol. you made a point that "men are egoistic validation seekers" and i countered with "so are women, it's not gendered". you don't have a counter to that. because there isn't one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:28 PM
-1

i see where the middle school boys are coming from now xD humanity is cooked. excellent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:11 PM
–

what you said is not gendered. egoistic behaviour is not gendered. woman seek validation and confirmation of desirability just the same, going for top 20% men or w.e. or posting endlessly online to get upvotes and asking if they hot etc. etc. who takes endless pictures of themselves? women do. guys don't. it's why it's so hard for them to make dating profiles, because they don't take million selfies all the time and they're not practiced at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:35 PM
–

nice rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:27 PM
–

hmm. not everyone thinks like you describe though. i don't devalue women if they had a lot of casual sex. in fact i value them more. sex is experience, the more you have, the better, in absolute terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:25 PM
1

> What is the ultimate point of having a relationship there isn't one. it's a temporary distraction from mortality till we kick the bucket. > And realistically, a relationship has two outcomes - marriage & kids, or separation. That's it. can you show me where in the laws of universe that's written please? i'll put it next to laws of gravity etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:06 PM
1

> It astounds me how some couples think that having kids is the way to strengthen a weak relationship. So fucking dumb. i think they just expect it to be a big enough distraction from the fact they don't actually like each other that much :P everything you said is true. you have 400IQ
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:57 PM
–

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:53 PM
6

so which one are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:53 PM
0

> just one small insecure subculture? oh 100% that one. no debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:50 PM
1

sorry was getting over excited. no it's not big, but it was an assumption and just drawing attention that it's not 100% of the cases women gave up more than she actually got. i agree with what you said there but > you’re acting like married women are all brokies upon marriage. These days most people getting married are educated upper middle class people with some family wealth and even some assets the vibe I got from the post is it's an asymmetry where man makes money and controls assets, while …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:48 PM
1

yes, that is how it is now. im suggesting we change that for the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:23 PM
1

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:18 PM
1

can you adopt me? (asking for a friend)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:55 PM
1

> I have a job to do. code for chasing tail ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:52 PM
2

> They do I mean that’s why people have lawyers and stuff when they divorce. It’s a negotiation the lawyers are there make the process go smooth. if they amicable then they can do w.e. asset split they want. but contentious means judge decides and keeps it simple 50:50. > If she left work to keep the kids alive at home even to do the bare minimum she will lose wages and earning she would make in the paid labor market. > Yes because the 50:50 is usually less than what she would get in the paid ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:47 PM
0

That's fine for an average case, which is good enough for law, on average. But it ignores the women who underperform (neglect / abuse the kids/husband) who could perhaps get less than 50, while also ignoring the women who outperform and raise great kids and could get more than 50. So back to the post, yes some motherhood is worth "less" and some will be worth "more". So i'd welcome law to be more nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:32 PM
1

> Avoiding motherhood while acting like mothers to pets and other people in their lives to sate their instincts is an obvious maladaptation, aka a flaw. as subjective opinion and i disagree. we'll have to agree to disagree then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:23 PM
2

I kindly invite you to read some Buddhism and you will understand. thanks you too <3
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:51 PM
–

that's gotta be bait now xD
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:48 PM
3

> Noticing these flaws is not misogyny your characterisation of them as flaws is misogyny. you're just driving a narrative that there's something "wrong" if they choose to live how they want - without kids. > Women will continue to want to be mothers long after your reddit account and all its karma are long gone but you're not talking about those women. you're attacking women who don't want that and call them sad and tell them how they should live their life. jokes on you though buddy. nice try …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:47 PM
–

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:58 PM
–

Jesus Christ is a man and his spirit is in all of us, we're all part of same Jesus Christ. > Men are a monolith? so yes!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:49 PM
–

hahaha i love this comment! <3
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:46 PM
–

oh you mean from POV of not accidentally running into your own estranged offspring kinda thing. alrighty (:
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:41 PM
–

huh? how do you know that? his profile posts are hidden. did he say in the comments here xD that's a different situation yeah...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:40 PM
–

yeah. that's the dual side of it. i agree with both > Dating apps are honestly a watershed innovation when it comes to “dating strangers”. and > Dating apps suck dude that's the tragedy. problem with meeting in bars and clubs is.... you meed the kind of people who hang out in bars and clubs. statistically the least likely to "stay together long term happily" kind of group. not sure if datings are better, but at least there's more variety there. or was. kinda become crappy now. i won't forgive Ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:37 PM
–

> keep it up. not in public though right? that would be like indecent exposure or w.e.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:31 PM
–

ah but you're woman, what do you know about women anyway? you need to listen the to purple man mansplaining how it is for women over there alright!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:30 PM
–

because it's subjective definition and everyone will have their own
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:27 PM
0

so you're happy with 50:50, same as Becky despite working more than Becky. cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:16 PM
3

> The only people who might be a little sad are your parents, if they want grandkids. But who gives a shit about your parents? They didn't sacrifice anything for you. You did everything on your own from the time you were born because you're a girl boss Qween 💪 cute. the kid didn't ask to be born or the sacrifices to be made. go on a ship. push someone over board, then immediately jump in to save them. are you a hero now? "i save them! where's my medal! i risked my well being to save them!" yeah …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:13 PM
3

So by your definitions women who chose to be child free are then just as disposable as men and can be sent off to die. cool!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:06 PM
5

> Its overbearing and sad. Better for her to just make a person like she was designed to. dripping with misogyny. > children raised by a loving mother grow up and take care of her in her old age cute delusion. children don't own anything to parents. they weren't consulted about being brought into this existence to be old people servants... > Pride ego. selfish reasons. and if the kids turn out to be criminals? should the woman just write them off and try again or? lol. > Love. nice fantasy, you …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:04 PM
6

> Clearly you don't have children. she did. she has an opinion and you have yours, but i don't get the need to accuse her of things like this. spoken like a real man lol. clearly your partner is doing all the hard work so you can be the "fun dad" (: see we can all make assumptions about everyone (:
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:57 PM
2

not quite, wrong sub lol antinatalists hang out in antinatalist sub. Their gotcha is that kids didn't ask to be born and there's no non-selfish reason to bring the kids into this life to suffer, making that decision on their behalf, gambling with their life. this "love" delusion is what bunch of clever monkeys though up to gloss over reproductive instincts to make themselves feel better about the fact they are forcing a bunch of new people into existence - some of which will grow up to be incels…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:50 PM
0

> All of these things are calculated and can be tallied. great so, why aren't the courts doing it? or are they doing it? > And if the kids aren’t dead or severely malnourished she obviously did something. You’re making it sound like you need a report to know if your wife is taking care of your kids when she is home with them all day and you aren’t. If she wasn’t caring for them that would be obvious. Child neglect is also a form of abuse and crime so if you think your wife is neglecting your chi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:25 PM
0

> Do you trust and respect her at all? she cheated and now we're divorcing. so that's a no and no. > The proof? Are you kids alive, healthy, educated? Is your house clean? Comfortable? Is their food in the fridge? On your dinner table? Do your kids go to doctor appointments? Do they have clothes and shoes that fit? Right now, imagine you're the woman doing all of the above. Now imagine Becky down the street is a mother doing none of that. Her husband works and does all of the above. Both you and…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:10 PM
1

no idea what ratio is. it's not relevant to anything i said other than it's provably not zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:00 PM
-2

yes you make a decision how the labour will be split. now. Where's the proof the work was done? the man can bring every pay slip of every month. where's the monthly report from the woman? the man can prove he did his end of the bargain. can the woman do the same? how? why should anyone trust either the man or the woman in a divorce when neither are incentivised the speak honestly at that stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 02:58 PM
0

> would you propose quantifying domestic labor in the moment then? My god, I feel like everyone would see that as a tedious enterprise. hmm so i was thinking about it and few thoughts. firstly yes it would be tedious, but then... that's a just a nature of a real job. if women want their domestic labour to be recognised as work - then they need to start treating it as such. I'm in touch with my manager through out the quarter and day to day he sees me doing stuff, sure. But when year is up and my…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 01:14 PM
0

yup, basically this!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:58 AM
1

rich older single mom, who don't need no man - cause she rich. kids taken care of. she can probs find a young hot bf then :P
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:55 AM
-4

> But it's also 2026, so I don't think "I didn't think she was doing much" from men is a valid play, given all of the conversations. well why not? we're still not tracking that work. it's not visible. like think from divorce pov. tensions are running high, trust may be gone. why would a man just take the woman's word at that point that yeah she did a lot work and wants half of everything? it's reasonable to ask for evidence no? in practice it's too much hassle without any prior record keeping so…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:50 AM
1

do you think none of romantic relationships are transactional? they all are. literally. just different terms of what's brought to the table. otherwise they are not romantic relationships at all (e.g. Agape). nowhere in the universe does it say the partners shall be equal in every metric: same age, same income, same everything. people can have asymmetric relationships and trade w.e. they want to trade.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:31 AM
1

i'd say depends on you partner. some will want that. other's perhaps want to ensure they have more power and independence and pay for themselves (at least sometimes).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:28 AM
1

so she'll be single (what most women want these days) and loaded (inheriting all the money) and still young enough to have runway to find another man too (if she wants)? sounds like a win win win.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:25 AM
0

Them - "we'll get married, he'll die soon, i'll inherit money. what's the problem? don't be jealous!"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:24 AM
2

bro WTF? she wasn't even born yet when you were 2 years old!!! sick!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:19 AM
1

you may want to look up definition of relationship then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:18 AM
1

> It’s whether or not I’m literally old enough to be his mom. I can live with being 14 years older than my parter you can be a mother at 14 y.o. just FYI
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:17 AM
1

ask those women. some may say money, others may say life experience and maturity of older men. to each their own
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:14 AM
5

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:06 AM
10

i think what you're missing is the asymmetry of the visibility of the work that is done. > like I'm a lazy grifter. firstly do you deny that lazy grifter women exist who just take advantage of their married men? ill assume you don't deny cause we can disprove real quick with real world examples. the point is that both women exist, hard workers and grifters. now here's the problem of visibility: stay at home work is largely invisible. when wife does her job well, the household runs smoothly and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:59 AM
1

well yes in your OG comment the man was open with his partner about only fans and the woman was not ok with it. that's why i asked "why not?" etc. and somehow we ended up here :D
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 12:14 AM
1

yeah, in the end it's all dumb luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 12:13 AM
1

> you thought research was “conjecture and assumptions” you did not cite any "research" in your OG comment neither with links nor literally using the word "research". > meaningless platitude “ignorance is bliss” sounded rational in your brain never said that either. you're putting words in my mouth. > Ignorance can be miserable.. Ignorance can cause anxiety.. can. or it may not. > And your little data point has nothing to do with anything I said. it's countering your "usually" argument. definiti…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 12:08 AM
1

> They are not on a dating app because there is a risk of their significant other finding out. > They go to escorts because that is the easiest route to cheat on their wife. i dunno why you're mixing in secrecy and cheating all of a sudden. you started off the thread with: "I can understand being upset if your SO is paying for only fans." which means the partner knows about the OF use. it's not a secret. there's no deception involved here, the partner just doesn't like the chosen hobby, which is…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 04:28 PM
1

> I don’t consider only fans a hobby. anything you want is a hobby. there's no universal declaration of what a "hobby" may be. <image> nope don't see OF excluded there. > But I actually do think people can police certain lifestyles their partners may want to engage in. ...That’s a rule in my relationship established by my male partner If you have some prior arrangement - you's can do what you want. My point this is not some default assumption you can make without negotiation. > I do think it’s r…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 04:03 PM
1

do you believe that applies in 100% of the cases? research says 50% cheaters are serial. so 50% are once off. flip a coin to decide your fate (:
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 03:48 PM
1

> Well financially I think there’s an issue with using money to sustain the lifestyle of another woman, when that money could go to the betterment of your family. lol? do you think partners are entitled to police their partners hobbies? sure the guy spending money building model trains in his garage is sustaining the lifestyle of the shop owner... lol. it is for the betterment of family. hobbies keep the man happy. this particular hobby keeps him happy. happy man, happy family. > Also from my un…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:47 AM
2

> For instance if an individual is unaware of something negative, does it impact them negatively? it may or may not. future is uncertain. nothing can be proven in advance. i think intent based approach is more workable: If cheater cheated and intends to do it again. then keeping it secret is potentially self serving. If cheater cheated once, regonised the source of issue, regrets it and will never do it again, will endeavour to be best partner they can then telling their partner is potentially d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:42 AM
2

no guarantee it will be exposed though. just because it's possible it will be exposed is by itself not an inherent reason to expose it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:05 AM
2

assumptions and conjectures
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:46 AM
5

yeah agree. that's the dual side of mathematics. given billions of people, it's mathematical certainty your match exists no matter how insanely niche. also, given how insanely niche and how spread out the population, the odds of meeting them randomly are overwhelmingly not in your favour. that's why im still big believer in dating apps. that's the problem they were meant to solve. democratize dating by connecting everyone, no matter how niche. the old OKC filters were meant to help. unfortunatel…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:45 PM
–

<image> lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:40 PM
-1

> I can understand being upset if your SO is paying for only fans. what's the issue there?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:32 PM
2

what's your bmi?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:31 PM
0

> objectively you can't prove objectivity. source? nihilism. good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:30 PM
1

yeah. like quotas don't work. all it's gonna do is shut out capable people. if university has 100 seats and there are 70 smart girls and 30 smart boys, i'd rather see the 70:30. not 50:50 where it's 50 smart girls, 30 smart boys + 20 not so smart boys and remaining 20 smart girls denied access. quotas are poor incentives. i want the best people on the job. I don't care about the gender of the person doing the job.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:54 AM
1

> Third layer : immediate equity quotas : mandate that if universities want public funding, they should install a 50/50 gender quota and have adequate scholarship programs for boys. Likewise, if corporate businesses want tax cuts, they must have a 50/50 gender quota for hiring. quotas don't work. meddling in the free markets don't work (ask USSR how that went). instead of quotas you should be adding incentives for individuals to join. "show me the incentives i'll show you the outcome" - Charlie …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:37 AM
2

> If a woman is dating a man who has more money or higher status than her, but he’s not more attractive than she is, isn’t that just an exchange of different traits rather than “dating up” across the board? If he brings status/resources and she brings youth/attractiveness, that sounds more like a trade-off than hypergamy. That's not definition of "hypergamy" afaik. Definition of hypergamy is dating someone of higher wealth and status - not looks. It's for financial security. Women trades youth a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:30 PM
7

> The females tend to do the bulk of the hunting, or food procurement and raising of the young. In quite a few social species, the males only real purpose is to give seed. Is that what the matriarchy is gonna look like? im all for it! let's gooooo matriarchy!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:15 PM
1

I'm having hard time understanding why everyone is so tense lol. I'm jealous of women who can "go their own way" and not be bother by pesky sex drive like men are. The whole T thing was a joke and everyone is interrogating me like i've just killed the president xD
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:27 PM
1

> Do you think because women have much more of certain sex hormones than men women are more or less likely to stay in bed all day? No idea where this is coming from. I did not mention any women in my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:24 PM
1

and where does estradiol come from in men? it's converted from T. no T, no estradiol. also when i said drive, i meant more than just sex drive. i mean drive to get up, go, lift, fight, compete, pursue take T out of a guy and he's just gonna be in bed all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:51 AM
-1

testosterone fuels a man's drive. women have a lot less of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 12:48 AM
1

which country? hiding earnings sounds even worse. tax evasion is gonna be taken even more seriously. you can mess with your ex - but not IRS!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 12:43 AM
-2

low key jealous. if only men had this capacity. the T doesn't allow us :/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 06:45 PM
1

which country? very curious. if daddy don't pay, they take it out of earnings. very easy to enforce and go after afaik.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 06:42 PM
0

and doesn't matter to others. some people fine to live however they want, without being "told how to live" by societal scripts - which is basically a prison if you ask me. if you think people should follow scripts as they are with no deviations then gay marriage would never be legalized. in fact nothing would change. ever. we'd just have permanently crystallised nuclear families with mommy and daddy and 2.1 kids. clearly that's not the world we're living in though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 10:52 AM
6

> if anything happens to that man or if he changes his mind in supporting her - she is screwed. No guarantee at all. are these laws in US? out here in EU parents are required to pay child support. regardless of their relationships status with anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 10:48 AM
5

you've hacked the system! cracked the code! seen through the matrix! (:
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 10:43 AM
1

> Agreeing to sex with someone for money doesn't change your sexuality. Porn stars have sex with people they have 0 attraction to all the time. Women will find other women safer. agree with all that. sure. i know there's gay for pay, but you're trying to tell me that it makes zero difference if a straight person has sex with opposite gender or same gender for money? ok so if a straight service provider has a choice between sex with opposite gender and same gender, all else equal (same money, bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 11:43 PM
2

how can you tell? what do they do with all this karma? trying to reincarnate as a real woman - a common fantasy on this sub lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:36 PM
2

ok so no joy. they got strict verification requirements for legal reasons. you just won't pass initial checks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:35 PM
1

i was talking physical contact work. overcoming physical barriers is a higher hurdle than virtual ones over screens.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:24 PM
1

really?? are you a straight woman and if so would you have sex with another woman (with or without money)? like, do straight women not exist anymore? they all bi? i don't get it. this is all news to me. hmm that Katy Perry song was pretty popular. shudda known haha jezuz guys. we really are cooked. it's over. we are entirely redundant XD
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:21 PM
1

> most straight women would absolutely choose the woman really? news to me
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:14 PM
2

I'm not sure how awards work, did that cost you money?? you didn't have to! but thank you (: This is very interesting to me, if you want you can DM me and we can chat more about what your life is like. But right now, i'm going to sleep it's 2am here...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:08 AM
1

you're an incredible human being. I've already said elsewhere I hold sex workers in extremely high regard https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1rz5j8e/comment/obp2nm2/?context=3&utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button but you're next level!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:45 AM
3

I'm in Ireland. we've got plenty of that Catholic guilt laws keeping stuff criminalised and dangerous for providers. it's bonkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:38 AM
3

exactly!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:32 AM
9

> a woman can just post her real self. why they even bother then! they can use AI too! and it's easy! > Oh plenty of guys do this and actually make a good amount of money I ran into a guy on Instagram that apparently did this and now it’s beating his actual job in terms of income. bro im gonna have to go investigate this holy damn. thanks for the side hustle idea!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:30 AM
5

i agree with your point, but i wasn't talking prostitution, only content creation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:28 AM
17

in age of AI, can men not generate fake OF girl profiles and make this money too now ?? serious question. i've literally just though of this now. very intrigued.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:24 AM
1

and i live in a state that continues to criminalize it, push it underground and so put the lives of workers at risk. jealous of men in w.e. place you live at. > Sex work really and truly is God's work. Amen to that!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:22 AM
0

you sound like a unicorn. most sex workers are deffo not this haha well done (:
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:16 AM
1

so (assuming you're straight) you're saying if you are forced at gun point to have sex with man, it is the same to you as being forced to have sex with a woman. lol. okey doke.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:12 AM
24

> With sex work while there is a general attractiveness requirement, there are plenty of degenerate men who pay for a purposely ugly women because that’s their thing. right but you're swinging from one niche minority (super aesthetic) to another niche minority (aesthetically challenged). yes niches make all the money. most women will be in the middle and so won't make as much money. just take YouTube that's something not gendered but same rules apply. Niches make all the money. Vast majority of …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:04 AM
-2

if you got all those skills that will excel in many well paying jobs... then why sex work?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:59 AM
2

not apples to apples comparison. it would have to be him doing hetero sex work. otherwise it needs to be compared to women doing lesbian sex work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:57 AM
0

> Men don't need to pursue everyone, everywhere, all at once and all the time sorry could you repeat that? I CoUlDn'T HeAr YuO OVER THE TESTOSTERONE IT'S TOOO LOUD!!1! <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:52 AM
-1

is this a low key covert operation to convince more men to quit the competition to make your life easier going after women OP? nice one
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:46 AM
8

> Bro you realize you can always find someone complaining about anything. every day im here im getting less convinced that they know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:34 AM
4

i don't think you got what he said. men simply wont be talking first. women can still come up and talk to men any time. the world can be as chatty as it is today, but in this world he's proposing, women will be doing the driving. his argument: when man approach woman, she may be intimidated (weaker sex). when woman approach man, he won't be intimidated (stronger sex). his question is: why not let women do all the approaching then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:17 AM
2

i don't even know where the rest of yall gather the patience to even entertain these posts with, in some cases, multi paragraph responses. lol. i ran out of patience just skimming this post
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:06 AM
1

to my subjective mind, that is just "being a nice person" not gendered in any way. that thread you linked is exactly what im talking about. ThatBitchA had her own subjective definition and OP had is own subjective definition and I disagree with both and have my own subjective definition. and that's the point my OG comment was making. none of us have objective authority to definitively say that femininity is XYZ. all we have is subjective unique POV - which will never align perfectly. hence endle…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:21 PM
1

> It's called experience. So anecdotal thank you, that's all i wanted to know. Like i've no issue if that was made clear from get go: "The problem with that logic is that may be what you prefer but that would turn off a majority of women in my experience." That's a different claim. Perfectly provable. The original line read as if you're making judgement on global population of 4 billion women based on your small sample of let's generously say a 1000 - which of course should be obvious that it do…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 09:49 AM
1

been thinking how to respond to this. not sure how. too metal for me. > If I killed someone for revenge that means I would be accepting my own death. oof between you and that other woman who said she owns 3 guns...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 11:31 PM
2

> LMAO touch grass or better yet a vagina. ayy now what would your boyfriend say if he saw you speaking to strangers like that online! > The dating world isn’t some statistical algorithm that can be solved. you're the one making statistical claims about "majority of women". my question is, do you have the data, or did you make it up?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 05:54 PM
1

that's one way to do it. may work on some people. how's the success rate?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 05:41 PM
18

they're not a match and that's that. would you rather two people who don't match force the issue and waste time staying together?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:59 PM
3

> And this maybe off topic but I hate when women say a relationship isn’t about sex but then expect a guy to keep courting her taking her on dates to keep her interested. Just date different women who think different bro. it's that simple. When I first met one of my exes, she took my hand, kiss me right away. Then took me to Japanese restaurant to treat me to a meal which she paid for. Another day she took me clothes shopping and bought me a nice jacket. Initiated sex twice a day every day, lite…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:32 PM
0

i would be less stressful for all parties if men stopped all approaching and women did all the approaching. because women is the weaker party so it's rational for them to always be on their guard and assume the worst when a guy approaches and what if they don't take the rejection well? get violent. the entire class risk associated with "not taking rejection well" can be eliminated for women, if men were barred from approaching and women were only ones allowed to do so. then risk of "angry reject…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:15 PM
2

IRL maybe, i dunno. can still happen online though. maybe cus barrier of entry lower. feels safer?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:58 PM
0

> “Damn…he really thought I was a possible option?” everyone's a possible option yes. probable? that's a different question. whether he want's to take 1% shot or 50% is for him to decide. you don't know what odds he's thinking. Brad Pitt is a possible option to you too. The odds are just very low. So you ruined your own day because you assumed that he thought his odds were some arbitrarily high number? So if you want save your day just assume it's low number. Reframe the thinking. Problem solved…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:45 PM
1

"femininity" is a random normative subjective label people conjured up that doesn't map to anything fixed in the universe. can be defined and redefined to mean anything by anyone at any time. yeah, human language is kinda useless like that. hence endless arguments / debates (about this, or pretty much anything else on this sub).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:28 PM
1

> become pedophiles huh? "become"? you think it's a choice? do you think being gay is a choice too?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:23 PM
1

> But it would partially be for revenge and partially be so they never hurt another person so you support capital punishment. do you think people are fixed and static and incapable of changing? never reform. why bother with prisons then. sure they'll just commit crimes when they get out right. there's no guarantee they'll commit the crime again. this is purely revenge first and foremost. killing them on "maybe they will hurt someone again" is the kinda justification Trump gives for pre-emptively…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 11:59 AM
1

> If the cost of making $2 is $3, the fact that people are complaining about it instead of just mindlessly throwing away their 3 bucks is a sign they have a functional IQ not that they are lazy. > Now obviously in real life it's not as obvious that you're trading $3 worth of effort for 2$ worth of reward but the debate should be about wether it's actually a good deal instead of just assuming it's a good deal and that the only possible reason someone wouldn't take it is because they are lazy. you…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:18 AM
1

> I am not disagreeing with you. I was not disagreeing with you either haha. you probably didn't get the joke. that's Sean Connery from his famous interview "it's ok to slap a woman" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YDqm7LXt2g basically yeah i agree with you
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:46 AM
2

<image> passport bros right now..
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:34 AM
9

you may expect, but you won't find it in reality across the board.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:29 AM
5

well im sure you noticed less and less are risking it... more and more staying single
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:11 AM
-1

> But women get killed, and generally more harmed, via people in their homes and or of whom they have relationships with. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:08 AM
1

flirting would be the main one. that's why it exists. test the waters for reciprocity with high plausible deniability comment. if getting green light on that, escalate from there. like lot of other stuff cuddly, touchy, hugging etc. can still be mistaken for being very close friends. can't mistake flirting. that's what's it for. to advertise interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:58 PM
2

> turn off a majority of women alright. hard, population wide stats or gtfo
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:21 PM
2

yeah it's funny he quoted verbatim the girl... but not himself. sus
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:13 PM
-1

context is everything. the co-worker example is textbook sexual harassment. yes. non-dating app online interaction. likely harassment. needs more specifics. dating app or actual date? no. you're gonna have a hard time proving to a judge that asking sexual questions on a dating app or an actual date is sexual harassment. because context. you can say it was unskilled or w.e. but context is romantic. sex is part of romance. romantic questions are expected in romantic context. all of this in terms o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:08 PM
1

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 10:28 PM
1

im guessing the "lust, thrust, bust and dust" men, aka fuckboys
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 10:12 PM
0

im not even sure if you're serious right now lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 10:09 PM
2

people aren't trustworthy by default no.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 09:52 PM
-1

> I'm going to interrogate him directly and indirectly about what kinds of dates he's been on in the past. How expensive those dates were, how much planning and effort he put into those dates. And if he doesn't do the same for me then I'll know he isn't actually into me and is planning on using me for sex And the person trying to just sleep with you would never lie about any of that of course. scout's honor and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 09:51 PM
5

we're on track for extinction lads!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 09:44 PM
1

indeed and yet 2 billion muslims think Prophet Muhammad is the greatest man to ever live
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 08:51 PM
4

yeah... she seems very smart for 16 though. i enjoyed this post. just... too bad it was completely off her own topic. "Women generally have it harder than men." how??? you didnt say!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:29 PM
1

> And you think you can predict which ones have given up? not with certainty no. that's why i said "feel" not "know". i may be off.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:22 PM
3

didn't say all, said some. some given up, some have above problem. > Stop making assumptions. no.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:00 PM
2

to slip something into the drink when she's not looking. obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:54 PM
1

ehh no. culture comes from the brain. brain comes from the genes. everything comes from the genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:04 PM
6

I feel some these struggling men have a case of learned helplessness. <image> don't wanna take risks. don't wanna change anything. oh but they want the rewards! lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:02 PM
1

there's no problem here. where's the problem? i don't see any problem. you invalidated her views. and? she already reject you. you're not gonna date. move on. her views are not relevant to you from here on. keep approaching till you approach one who likes being approached. that by definition is your match. i dunno why you guys keep inventing problems where there aren't any.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:44 PM
1

ok so imagine all 4+ billion women collectively tell you to jump off a cliff. are you gonna? do you just follow everything you're told? you most definitely don't. so i don't see what the problem is. if you somehow think that every single women on this earth doesn't want to be approached, then that's trivial to disprove. so there's no problem. approach away (:
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:37 PM
1

> Yes. Absolutely. Im too old for that shit. i understand. you are free to want that, but no risk - no possible reward. it is what it is. that's just the "game of life" we've all been thrust into by an indifferent universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:31 PM
3

concur with gecko. it's just a job. just because they provide a service to men, doesn't mean they wanna date the men. Compartmentalization. just like doctors don't want to sleep with every patient they intimately examine. > sexually debasing themselves is your subjective opinion and i disagree. i think sex workers are wonderful people providing a highly valuable service and to me are revered right up there with doctors, engineers, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:16 PM
1

Well, many conservatives rallying behind Trump on his rallies! Or other republican social events. Plenty to bond over. I'm sure people there shoot their shots (sometimes literally). Lots of passionate heated debates, shots fired! (sometimes literally).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:00 PM
1

Im not sure if you're agreeing with me or not. what you said is all true. but doesn't change anything about what i said. yes "morality" is a tool we evolved to promote cooperation. it's real in that it exists in your mind, but it's not real outside your mind, it's not mind independent. "feeling" a notion of morality is real phenomenon in your mind yes, but it's just an opinion. subjective. can (and has been) redefined to be w.e. you want it to be by charismatic leaders all the time. Unlike descr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 04:35 PM
1

they do indeed. tale as old as time. Way back in 7th century Prophet Muhammad founder of Islamic had many young wives. Youngest Aisha. Married at 6, consummated at 9 (disputed of course, but at most 14). He himself was ~50.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 04:05 PM
1

everything comes from genes. that's the bio code. lust comes from neurons firing. neuron construction & behaviour are determined by genetic code yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 04:03 PM
1

"prefer" is a broad term. universally, men of all ages, find women's beauty peak at 22. which correlates with reproductive peak. woman are on the other hand are linear (older women like older men - their age group). but to be clear, this is for beauty. (there's studies on this and im too lazy to dig them up) from natures POV or reproduction it makes sense. younger women have longer reproductive lifespan and older men have more resources to support the offspring etc. Now for actual relationships …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:32 AM
4

title of that link: "Most Democrats who are looking for a relationship would not consider dating a Trump voter" that does't surprise me lol. anyway I'm gonna do something rare for PPD and actually take accountability by admitting i was wrong. > Also - notice how I used the word many and not most or all. Indeed you said "many". My mistake was that embarrassingly till literally right now I though that "many" was synonymous with "most". It's not! Many can be less than half! So i take it back what i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:17 AM
3

<3 they certainly have ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:55 PM
1

haha i didn't think you'd respond. ok, i mean, cards on the table I subscribe to nihilism. if you know what that is you'll understand why I don't inherently agree with: > But as people we should assure everyone has the basic necessities for human life to be alive. because to back a "should" of any kind, you'd have to prove to me why I should. as far as i can tell that's not possible. this is deep philosophical debate that rages far beyond the scope of this sub. Simply put, I understand that you …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:54 PM
3

yeah. it's just a proxy, because we got hard data on that with votes
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:38 PM
4

so that's 39% who voted republican. slightly worse than a coin flip odds. if you look white women specifically (which is most of US population) https://circle.tufts.edu/2024-election#gender-gap-driven-by-young-white-men,-issue-differences White women (18-29) in 2024 election were 49% Trump, 49% Harris. A literal coin flip split. so "wholly unappealing to many women" is technically correct for all women of all races in USA, but it's trying to make it sound like it's a bigger deal than it is. it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:35 PM
1

There's no objective, universal, or intrinsic value system that could dictate what a person or entity ought to receive. So no, no one "deserves" anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:00 PM
5

> conservatism, at least in the west, is wholly unappealing to many women huh? aren't 45%+ of republican supporters women?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:50 PM
1

ah ok
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:39 PM
2

no ones entitled to anything
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:37 PM
2

the posts on this sub are so cartoony. like literally Hollywood style neat little narratives with a clear "bad guy" and clear "good guy" and no shades in between. real world is only shades! lots of shades! all 50 of them!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:33 PM
1

there are no universal "shoulds or oughts" out there. that's the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:31 PM
2

facts!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:27 PM
-1

> No one deserves anything. No that's it, don't need to go further. The universe is indifferent. No one deserves anything. it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:27 PM
1

yup
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:26 PM
1

facts
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:25 PM
3

smart
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:17 PM
1

facts again
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:17 PM
1

doesn't need to be grateful or ungrateful. up to him what he wants to do after.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:15 PM
1

doesn't need to make her happy or unhappy. it is what it is. i personally would rather know asap so i can move on yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:13 PM
1

facts
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:10 PM
1

hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:56 PM
2

"nuance" is a dirty word on the internet. we shall not speak it. mention it. or ever discuss it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:40 PM
2

quick Q4A: based on my prose and style of writing in PPD, which gender am I IRL?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:25 PM
1

you mean to say im a woman? what gave it away!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:13 PM
2

They don't need to understand. Even if they did it changes nothing. > 99 rejections is enough to cause serious mental distress That's not their problem. Thats none of their concern. All they did is tell you you're not a match. How you react to that is on you. You're not in control of their response, but you may manage your reaction. Getting upset over it is a choice you're making. Literally. You don't believe me? Invite you to read some Buddhism. Unconscious sends you thoughts all the time, plea…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:43 PM
3

like yeah cold approach success rate is like 1% at true random. so yeah a lot of rejections is part of the game
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:00 AM
0

so you want win while taking no risks? you can reframe anything. > social influencers who will record everything and post to social media so you've just got free advertising that you're single and looking to big audience of women, some of which have minds of their own and find you attractive regardless of what happened in the video? i'd say that's a win.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:59 AM
2

this is it OP. it's just random dumb luck. really. you're not in control of this thing. having control is an illusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:49 AM
0

and if women tell you to jump off a cliff are you gonna...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:42 AM
3

invite you to read about nihilism. you'll learn that universe is indifferent and does not guarantee anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:40 AM
2

> Dating really is all luck and timing. 10000%
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:38 AM
-1

what a strange answer. no no is a yes then.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:37 AM
–

no, it is alive. unless you want to redefine what "alive" means. then we're playing a different game of semantics. if it was not alive, then your body will reabsorb it, ejecting it out with next period or if far enough along, you'd be having a stillbirth etc. > So they should be prioritised over the person that is alive I said absolutely nothing about any "should". If people want to abort or not is up to them I've no position either way and didn't declare any. I'm a nihilist and offered a descri…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:26 AM
2

there's research out there showing women tend to be more people-oriented and men more thing-oriented. even in newborns, who have not been heavily influenced by social and cultural factors, hinting at a biological basis. just born with biases for different interests wired.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:13 AM
1

we're deffo talking past each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:29 PM
–

they most definitely are alive. not conscious maybe. but deffo not dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 10:48 PM
1

cool cool, but this has zero impact on the lives of nice people dating other nice people. "generally" is not 100%. so not sure what your point is trying to achieve? even if most women like assholes, so what? what about it? who cares about most people. you're not dating most people. most people in USA are straight white christians. minorities like LGBTQIA+, ethnic minorities, neuro-divergents w.e. else - they are dating just fine, they haven't died out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 10:42 PM
0

> men have made up over 99% of combat fatalities and who were most of rape victims once a place was sacked? btw, who killed 99% of those men? i think it was other men. maybe have a word with them and ask them to stop killing their own gender so much. self inflicted problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 10:32 PM
1

> Nah they were talking about the same type of relationship as me. Otherwise they would of specified "casual". No nothing to do with casual. There's no one type of committed relationship. Two (or more!) people can define their relationship to be literally whatever they want it to be. Don't mean to sound rude but, thats... obvious isn't it? > These men seem to think women are trading sex for commitment and seem to think the primary purpose of a relationship is that they would then be entitled to …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:59 PM
2

right lets reign it in as we're quickly going out of scope. let's be precise in language. you simply said "women this... women that..." but you didn't say how many. some? most? all? if you're statement is "some women have naive view of power" and "some women are attracted to assholes" then that's provably true. also provably true is that "some women don't have naive view of power" and "some women aren't attracted to assholes". You're language was never precise to specify the amount so i assumed …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:45 PM
6

> If the relationship is solely based on sex that is a FWB or just casual sex, or being a sugar daddy and not an actual relationship. All those things listed are "relationships". sorry to be pedantic, but it's a semantic problem we're having here. you have a particular idea of what a "relationship" is, as if it's one specific thing. "relationship" is a broad term not constrained to a single idea you seem to have. so your post is talking past each other. they were taking about X type of relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:52 AM
1

in your imagination? just because you conjure up random thoughts in your mind does mean they map to an actual reality bro. im imagining a pink elephant right and now and he's not standing my room i can assure you of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:04 AM
2

bro you got it all mixed up ass backwards. a small weak insecure dog barks the loudest and acts like asshole - because they are insecure and need to prove something. a large strong dog is confident and secure and doesn't even bark. he's nice. he doesn't need to prove anything. he knows he's him.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 11:52 PM
15

not even an LLM is this confident in their delusions xD
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 11:20 PM
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 10:51 PM
1

why your parents need to die? or is that part of the plan? the plot thickens...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 10:32 PM
1

sorry, but what's the alternative strategy you'd like to actually propose? to appeal to what most people value? bro you're not even doing that. i guarantee it. RedPill is a tiny niche sub-community on global scale, statistically irrelevant. So by your words, RedPill opinions don't matter. If you want to appeal to what most people value you should be wearing blue, not red.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:45 PM
–

in Nihilism "should/shouldn't" don't exist. if you just replace that with "don't need to". i.e. "Dating isn't fair and it doesn't need to be. (to continue the species)" etc. then rest seems accurate. if goal is to continue species with the strategy of reproducing generations that have the best fit, the mechanism that is consistent with that strategy is competition. "fairness" etc. are random subjective labels people conjure up to describe the fact they lost the (human) race. nature is indifferen…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 10:00 AM
1

sorry bud you're getting all kinds of confused there. why do you care what most women and men value? are you planning to date most men and women? that's billions of people. not physically possible. so why do you care? have you actually done the math and realised you can focus on the most niche 0.1% of the entire population and still have have a dating pool of millions. a number so mind numbingly large, that would require multiple life times to date through. You're right that even if you date a 1…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:42 AM
–

yeah. mens section in clothing shops is a little corner tucked away at the back, or the basement or somewhere upstairs where the kids section is. wanted to get a nice leather jacked. went through dozens of stores in various large shopping centres. abysmal selection. like a handful across all of the stores combined. and all terrible. meanwhile just one woman's shop has tonnes of good choices. mens oppression! must be the patriarchy right? somehow it's always the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 12:03 AM
1

childfree have entered the chat.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 11:52 PM
1

i can already picture a sketch where the woman pulls out a gun and in the chaos accidentally shoots her husband
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 11:49 PM
–

people can have high libidos and masturbate a lot, but still be selective with their partners and have low N count. or just busy with life. studies. work. less time to date, till now perhaps. it's not a perfect predictor. personally i don't think anyone's history matters. what matters is the future you plan on together. past performance is not predictor of future performance. You just talk, in advance, to discuss libido etc. and check for compatibility. a high N count person could be looking to …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:40 PM
–

just an idea, but don't you think it's the other way around? if someone comes clean and up front like "yeah i have high N count, but now im reformed". vs someone who has high N count and hasn't reformed and will actively fake and lie to conceal that very fact "yeah only a few..."?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:12 PM
–

i've seen a few of your comments on posts recently. rapidly becoming one of my favourites. like "what it would like if a sane rational person were to make a comment on PPD?" kind of vibes haha im surprised you've ended up here. just makes me wonder even harder what kind of special secret insanity you must be harbouring hmm? there are no sane people on PPD :P
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:05 PM
–

so you're assuming people are completely static and never change? that's provably false.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:00 PM
7

gotta love the ole tism. no filters. less masks. world would be better place if everyone speak what's on their mind directly. not living under delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:17 PM
0

Junior_Ad_3086 thought, that you though that. Based on your OG comment. He though you were one of those people. why would anyone think it’s an all or none thing? That's how your OG comment reads. I understand that's not your actual position, so we'll chalk this up as "misspoke unintentionally".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:42 PM
-2

are you arguing in bad faith? Marriage isn’t for everyone (1). But for a lot of people getting to have a sleepover every night with your best friend (with opportunities for some extra fun adult time) is a great way to live. (2) Why did you put clause (1) & (2) side by side then, implying they are related via the but conjunction? The implication being that marriage is for those who want to have a friend to sleep with. u/Junior_Ad_3086 is calling you out that you don't need marriage for that. I du…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:31 PM
0

you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:23 PM
1

craziness isn't gendered
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 06:01 PM
1

how is that relevant to my point?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:48 PM
0

I value Isaac Newton and Nikola Tesla far more than some chad with 300 N count. The former are in history books, the latter are nobodies. Choosing to value men based on N count is your choice. Don't assume everyone thinks like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:19 PM
19

yeah, how would anyone even know the number. not a topic commonly discussed during dates afaik
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter