TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_not_forgotten Archive

View 4 posts and 58 comments by _not_forgotten on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Precedents and statutes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_fraud#United_States That includes paternity by ambush, courtesy of the Department of Health and Human Services. HHS pays hospitals to acquire a man's signature at birth of a child assumed to be his. State laws prevent the "father" from reversing the acknowledgment after a period of time (months in some states) even if DNA evidence proves no biological paternity. Millions of men per year acquire child support obligations in this way…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:11 AM
15

The interview is all apologetics for the cheating women.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:36 AM
1

Anybody know if NCFM's suit against Selective Service is still going forward? Last I heard, government had moved to strike. Wouldn't want to take away men's conscription privilege. /s
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:47 AM
-9

This is an adversity and bootstraps story. The headline is misleading.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:14 PM
2

This is what the former director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction says: “I think in many cases female staff are better suited than males,” Wilkinson said. “A good mix of staff is what we always want. That so-called motherly impact is a big deal and women who are stern but fair with the inmates I think can perform that job as well as any male could.” He's more concerned with "motherly impact" and gender balance in the ranks than holding people to account for abusing juvenil…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:07 AM
8

If a man is not aware of the child, which he may not be if his wife or former wife doesn't notify him of the child right away, he loses all chance to fight the child support... I see it's a Christian site, but this is still a very weird way to describe the problem. In 2011, 44% of single mothers were never married. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2013/05/Breadwinner_moms_final.pdf
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:52 PM
3

I see the language used, but: this is relevant how?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:17 PM
7

A social experiment... that has outed itself already. TL;DR Give me money to build an engine for this project that really only rises to the level of mod content for any number of existing games. The evil feminazis will surely fall over themselves to play and we can maybe laugh about it later. /s Can we all just give $10 to SAVE instead?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:23 AM
2

Life decisions informed by experience are not bitter by default.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:08 AM
25

Seriously, look at this woman's attitude. She lives with the father of one of her children, says she gets "no help" from him, except that he contributes financially to three kids two of whom are not his. Ms. Hawkins, the mother of three, lives with her youngest child's father but considers herself a single parent. "When he's home, he's watching TV; it's his time. I get no help. Financially, he's been a good provider," she said, even for the children who aren't his. This is a sob story?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:54 AM
2

So here's some responsible writing (emphasis mine): The best and worst of fatherhood, by the neighborhood This map shows Census tracts where most children live with only one parent (in red and orange, with red being the highest rates) and also those tracts where more than 9 in 10 children live with both parents (in green). Click a tract to see detailed stats. Apparently single fathers are part of the "worst of fatherhood" problem.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:47 AM
3

I don't understand these requests. Research using the internet is so very efficient. You can get to a whole lot of primary source information in no time. Of course, you have to put in the effort to read it. Maybe that's what is missing...
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:04 AM
1

I agree that ACA is far from perfect. But keep in mind that it is designed to improve access for people on the margins. If more men get proper preventive care -- vaccinations, regular checkups, mental health, you name it -- then fewer men end up on the streets with the ER as their only option. If there's a gender bias, sure, we should talk about it. Don't let this thread turn into a condemnation of universal healthcare.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:20 AM
12

There is risk in: litigating collecting a judgment All of that costs money, time, stress. No matter how right you think you are, a favorable outcome is not guaranteed.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:03 AM
2

I discussed this episode here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h7vbb/stigmatize_the_accused_military_justice_and_sen/ I wonder what Sen. McCaskill's staff is thinking. Calling out an offending journalist by name seems likely to drive unconvinced people to his columns. Search for "taranto wsj" on Google, and you're at his page straight away.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:59 AM
1

Thanks. James Taranto has his follow-up here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324328204578571513417729392.html
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:37 AM
0

let's see some citations. Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress Page 6-7 Table 6–3 shows that a biological parent was the perpetrator, the majority of children were maltreated by their mothers (75%), but a sizable percentage were maltreated by their fathers (43%). In contrast, when a nonbiological parent or parent’s partner was the perpetrator, this was typically a male (for 64% of children versus only female for only 48%). In other words, in the …
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:37 AM
16

Totally worth the 30 minutes -- if only for the 1900s Milwaukee newspaper reference.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:32 AM
3

Remember the "scandal" that was a video of some troops pissing on their enemies' corpses? That is the limit of an average civilian's conception of war atrocities. A soldier having his anus forcibly penetrated by another soldier? Maybe I saw something like that in Shawshank Redemption... was that the movie? Senator Kirsten Gillibrand gets credit for acknowledging men as victims of military sexual assault. That is more than many other members of congress can claim.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:08 AM
20

Nothing. It's just projection, bitterness, and poor quality writing.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:39 AM
3

I did a write-up on the Claire McCaskill statement before I saw this thread. I can delete this comment if there's an etiquette issue. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h7vbb/stigmatize_the_accused_military_justice_and_sen/
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:28 AM
2

These mental gymnastics are incredible. A person commits theft of state secrets about domestic and foreign intelligence programs, carries those secrets to their country's greatest adversaries, and your first reaction is gender-based sympathy?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:15 AM
2

The idea of hypergamy as evolved psychology supports your observation.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:35 AM
3

Primary source: http://jech.bmj.com/content/54/4/254.full.pdf+html CONCLUSIONS Marital status, especially divorce, has strong net effect on mortality from suicide, but only among men. [...] The study further observed that failure to control for relevant socioeconomic variables or combining men and women in the same models could produce misleading results. Dr Kposowa acknowledges that it is not really scientifically appropriate to study suicide without considering gender.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:27 AM
1

/r/mensrights fails to understand "credibility": pandashuman 17 days ago on /r/LawSchool [...] my decision to be a lawyer has ruined my professional life. I am a two-bit, bus bench shitlawyer with absolutely no prospects of improving my situation. No one can pay legal fees, I can't go out on my own with my debt, and I'm robbing peter to pay Sallie Mae every single month, struggling to keep my head above water.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:10 AM
1

pandashuman 7 days ago on /r/adviceanimals You mens rights nutjobs all seem to have a picture of a family court judge in your head that is some old dude in suspenders, drooling through every custody case and then banging the gavel and proclaiming that "children belong with the mama, and that's it." It's bullshit. Unconcerned?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:55 AM
1

They're just a very sophisticated concern troll.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:44 AM
12

You did state that mens' rights don't need advocacy, but your own experience reveals at least one of many anti-male social biases that this subreddit acknowledges with evidence. You have previously stated that /r/mensrights is light on rationality. Do you still stand by that?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:32 AM
15

You're not addressing the issue. 6 days ago in /r/AdviceAnimals No one will want to hear what I have to say in mensrights since I don't agree that the system is out to screw men over. Rationality seems to be rare in that sub, but maybe I'll try again Who is being irrational? You are broke and unhappy in your career. You likely chose this career because of an anti-male social bias. But you don't believe that the MRM has merit.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:19 AM
22

You changed your career path based on an anti-male social bias. You are dissatisfied with your current career (broke, "sales" is not fun). That is relevant.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:12 AM
16

Ok, you are broke and unhappy in your job. I get that. This is not meant as a pile-on. I don't think that men's rights need advocating. In college, I wanted to be an elementary school teacher but I ran into certain biases that put me off that path. Not knowing your specific situation, but considering statistics, it is likely that this was gender bias. Do you not experience cognitive dissonance?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:52 AM
1

I didn't downvote this. As far as I'm concerned, sharing different perspectives is the point of being here.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:11 PM
1

There is no "front line" in Afghanistan, which is how women have been exposed to combat over the past 12 years. Yes, they patrol (including dismounted) and fight and do not cause chronic discipline problems. Female fighter pilots had been serving years before Operation Anaconda. All military members who are at high risk of capture receive training in conduct after capture. Read between the lines on that. All the services have physical fitness testing that is designed as much to contain future me…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:51 AM
3

Did our "straight male feminist" just delete all of his posts? EDIT: Sure enough, they's gone. Here are some bayarea415 quotes from other threads to characterize our "sour" man. 1 day ago in /IAmA Hi there, born and raised Catholic that went to catholic school all of my life (including college at the Catholic University of America in DC). I am no longer a Catholic, but have always respected the church for what it has done to raise me to be the open-minded, loving person I am today. But I also ca…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 01:02 AM
1

Stephen Baskerville wrote a very well researched and credible chapter on this in Taken Into Custody.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:53 AM
21

Read the FAQ.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:50 AM
6

The Family Support Act of 1988 created a system of kickbacks from the federal government to states for routing child support collections through their criminal collections systems. The kickbacks are proportional to the amount of child support collected and amount to $200M+ nationwide per year. Those dollars go into states' general funds and can be expended for any purpose.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 04:18 AM
6

In 1995, DOJ reported that for spousal murders, as a percentage: More husbands are prosecuted More wives are acquitted More husbands are sentenced to prison The average prison term for husbands is 16.5 years The average prison term for wives is 6.0 years http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/SPMUREX.PDF
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:04 AM
2

That thing he did with The Lonely Island was funny.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 12:13 AM
2

Hey Mr. Bolton, some light reading: Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress Page 6-7 Table 6–3 shows that a biological parent was the perpetrator, the majority of children were maltreated by their mothers (75%), but a sizable percentage were maltreated by their fathers (43%). In contrast, when a nonbiological parent or parent’s partner was the perpetrator, this was typically a male (for 64% of children versus only female for only 48%). The pattern i…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 12:12 AM
5

I agree with you, and please don't think I'm trying to be sanctimonious with this comment. To me it's about the difference between being right and doing right. Provoking negative feelings does not necessarily do us any good. Challenging somebody and changing their mind without alienating them is difficult. In an open forum or with people I know well enough, sure, I will be aggressive if necessary. The OP sort of invokes the image of a FB dragnet for anti-father posts, and I'm not convinced that …
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:57 PM
2

Control the message by feigning interest in an alternative viewpoint, but passively undermine it all the way along. And not very subtly in this case.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:57 PM
11

Citation: Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress Page 6-7 Table 6–3 shows that a biological parent was the perpetrator, the majority of children were maltreated by their mothers (75%), but a sizable percentage were maltreated by their fathers (43%). In contrast, when a nonbiological parent or parent’s partner was the perpetrator, this was typically a male (for 64% of children versus only female for only 48%). The pattern is similar when other perso…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:39 PM
6

TL;DR Fathers are 1% better than the stereotype my colleagues perpetuate. But only because there's a holiday.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:33 PM
1

Sure, I agree about the utility of social media. Changing somebody's mind is a very personal thing. It's why door-knocking is still used in political campaigns. MRM can't rely exclusively on interactions buffered through the internet.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:57 PM
3

Its better to go a night without sex than to not protect yourself from a person you don't really know. "Accidental" pregnancies occur in all manner of relationships, not just one night stands. That said, I agree that it is not helpful to expand the meaning of rape to encompass other concepts. "Non-Consensual Paternity" may be a better term, but with sex as a private activity, these things will probably never be provable if one party isn't acting in good faith. Facing issues today like HHS pushin…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:44 PM
49

Some important numbers for demonstrating systemic bias are the rates of woman-initiated divorce (about 2/3) and rate of custody awarded to the mother (about 80%). Historically family law attorneys have advised fathers that the system is slanted against them. http://developmentalpsych.sfsu.edu/sites/sites7.sfsu.edu.devpsych/files/assets/Cookstonpapers/LawyerPaper2002.pdf I understand the frustration that comes with "deadbeat dad" and its variations. I agree that intent matters, but it is also ver…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:22 PM
1

It's the "internet" part of the equation. Confronting something like this in person is many times more effective than using written form, if only because it may not seem like a confrontation at all.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:42 PM
2

If you are not confident to get a recording, don't let that keep you from taking action. Filing a complaint that documents the threat of false accusation is much better than doing nothing. Based on your description, you are being stalked by an individual with adverse personality traits that have been amplified by a religion-like external influence. Don't rely on that resolving on its own.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:32 PM
3

Translation: I like your club but I hate everybody in it. I like to perpetuate flame wars. I still don't know what condescending tone is.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:05 PM
2

Please share what these "ridiculous amount of factors" are and how many are actually unknowable to the person drinking. This just wraps back around to a person not taking personal responsibility. If a person's alcohol tolerance is so volatile, they should not choose a social life that revolves around drinking. If a person is raped, the crime is terrible and should be punished. If a person impairs their judgment with alcohol or drugs, gets in a car with a stranger, and is raped, the crime is terr…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:57 PM
6

Your other comments tonight following this one are: Hi. Suck my dick. ;) and Go ahead downvote my appropriate reply. I don't blame you since you're a neckbeard and your gf looks like this. http://i.imgur.com/qYLc1.png Please continue to advise us on intervention, the fragility of our man-egos, and how to properly treat an anti-social woman at a party.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:21 AM
4

TL;DR History of Modern Circumcision Mid-1800s, Jewish doctors convince mohels to use surgical tools instead of fingernails in circumcision. Then the procedure is used experimentally in America as medical intervention. Observed positive effects are never properly understood (controlled studies don't exist yet). Misguided medical practices and the US military's circumcising thousands of men in both world wars normalizes the practice. By the mid-1900s, most of the western world has abandoned circu…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:15 AM
2

The whole paper is worth reading. From page 25: A Continuous Stream of Justifications Michael Katz writes with regard to the medical justifications for male circumcision that “There is no parallel in other prophylactic measures, such as immunization. No other prophylactic measure attempts to achieve a benefit by abrogating a natural process.” The point is that even if the prophylactic claims are true, they come at too high of a price. He also points out that, over time, the medical justification…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:31 AM
3

When I go out, I'm always on the lookout for women looking slightly uncomfortable so I can do my duty as a person and provoke a barfight. /s
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:04 AM
1

Unlike some other academics, it is hard to fake a meritocracy in engineering schools. (It still happens.) It is possible to distinguish between women who operate on merit and those who rely on attributes that are irrelevant to the discipline (titties, etc.). Engineering is sometimes hyper-rational. There may be a general psychology that biases toward that, but good (and great) genuine female engineers exist. EDIT: grammar
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:40 AM
2

Two words: Silicon Carbide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbide#Jewelry
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:12 AM
2

I should clarify that I do not have righteous indignation over this. My initial reaction was situational. I still don't like it, but that's it.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter