TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_skip_ Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by _skip_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Holy shit. Reddit is going full on fascist. Fascinating that sites like Return of Kings are still permitted while AVFM is banned. These power-hungry assholes just can't help themselves. Mark my words, the Reddit brand is going to fail. Internets don't like censorship.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:33 AM
6

Many people involved in Men's Rights find fascist sites like ROK repulsive. Karen's apparently okay with them, which is her prerogative. Just don't ask the rest of is to get on board with reactionary bigots.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:12 AM
3

It's important to remember that a lot of Red Pill philosophy is not supported by science. Some of it is, and that's fair enough, but they take it to an absurd level.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:00 AM
0

RP types are ideologues. Their theories are certainly not supported by science. Karen is guilty of this as well, eg when she promulgates the work of Steven Pinker, who's work has been soundly debunked by anthropologists, archeologists and other experts.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:59 AM
5

You should study up on anthropology. Human behaviour expresses itself in wildly different ways according to culture.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:56 AM
2

Sorry, but not everyone supports far right wing philosophy. You'll just have to deal with that.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:54 AM
8

Take a look at what happened to the G20 protesters in Toronto. Raw brutality. If a protest actually threatens power you better believe they will kick your ass. These kids are treated with kid gloves because they are useful idiots for the establishment.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:51 AM
19

What I find interesting about these events is the way the police treat the protesters. When a protest actually threatens power you can bet you will not be given the kid gloves treatment. Take a look at what the RCMP did at the G20 summit in Toronto. Over 1000 protesters were arrested and brutalized. Here, the kids are politely asked to leave and go back to their gender studies courses.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:41 AM
0

Are you telling me how to ride a bus? Lol. I spent ten years riding the bus in the most congested city in NA, Vancouver, Canada, to school and later to work. Men were not the problem. You females who have your lives catered to, every little thing provided you, need to shut the fuck up and learn to work for a living. You're already treated like special snowflakes. Do the right thing and pursue justice. You claim to be a male. Presumably you're the guy who helped lift Matress girl's art project ar…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:08 AM
0

Again, the fact that I'm being downvoted by obviously upper class clowns who have never taken the subway in their lives -- fuck you, white knights.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:00 AM
0

I said that Marx "coined" the term. Not "founded" the term. Anarchism is as old as the hills. If we were to apply Western political dynamics to "hunter-gatherer" bands we would have no choice but to conclude that anarchism is the only viable form of socio-political origination. Which may be true...
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:55 AM
0

Marx coined the term.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:45 AM
7

Yes. We're all aware the lying fink did a porn. No, no one really gives a shit. The more attention people shower on this nutcase the more she thrives. Give her what she deserves: zero attention.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:25 AM
0

Oh goodie, I'm getting downvoted on an MRA site where people should at least pay attention to male physiology...
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:21 AM
-1

You are pure scum. Where is Karen Straughan aka Girlwriteswhat when you need her?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:09 AM
0

No man has ever needed to sit that way. I'm not sure what "way" we're talking about here, but I have taken public transit for ten years and yes, it is uncomfortable to crush one's balls and sit like a woman. As is almost always the case, these feminist "reforms" target lower class men. I urge you to sit with your legs crossed for the next 100 subway trips you take. Nothing pisses me off more than pathetic white knight worms like yourself throwing other men under the bus. If you were in my vicini…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:03 AM
1

This is not just about dicks, in fact it has nothing to do with dicks. It has to do with balls, both metaphorical and literal, but more importantly other aspects of male physiology (hips, shoulders etc.) It is egregious for you and other feminists to condemn men for sitting as nature intended. It would be like some backward ape condemning women for having larger asses and breasts. This is unacceptable. Clean up your act and I'm pretty sure no one will call you a Eunuch.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:26 AM
-1

I wasn't aware of the fact being reasonable makes one a Eunuch. Well, you're certainly lacking in balls, and I would definitely not call you "reasonable." Here's a biology lesson: men have differently shaped hips, a higher center of gravity, and things called "testicles" between their legs. And here's a history lesson: subway/train/bus seats were designed to create a "compromise" between men, women and children. Large men were only included in this analysis insofar as they were "averaged out" to…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:46 PM
0

Are you a man or a woman? If you're a woman, STFU and learn about male physiology. If you're a man, try not to act like such a Eunuch.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:34 PM
3

Lousy article. Someone needs to teach this girl about male physiology. There is nothing "rude" about men sitting with their legs spread. It's not at all comparable to a woman putting her bag on an adjacent seat. Saying, "we're making a mountain out of a molehill" isn't enough -- this is an attack against men for our biology, the very definition of sexism. It's refreshing to see a feminist speaking out against the nanny state (a nanny armed with military weapons), however. Hopefully she can expan…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 07:07 PM
1

Let us not besmirch the noble cat by linking it to feminism. Cats behave like special snowflakes, yes, but they are also cute, entertaining, affectionate and terrific hunters. Name me a prominent feminist who possesses even one of these qualities. Also, how many feminists can do this? http://i.imgur.com/HEQ90xO.gifv
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:08 PM
5

Someone should make a horror movie about this chick. She is truly nightmare material. In other words the perfect mascot for modern feminism.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:44 AM
1

Judy Dench is hot.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:27 AM
8

Honestly you come across as a feminist troll/false flagger. "fuck bitches," "cunts" etc. You sound like a feminist trying to ape a misogynist.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:25 AM
1

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:00 AM
-1

By the strict definition of capitalism, the state should have no part in trade or industry Where the hell did you get that definition? Show me a source. Are you aware that Marx coined the term "capitalism"?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:45 AM
2

I agree that wage slavery is hardly supportive of individual independence, but until relatively recently, it was the best system we've had to get things done without infringing on property rights. Well, there are also pre-industrial societies, which have us beat to the tune of 99% of our history. And there were the actual "free markets" of peasant villages. Which did not resemble Game of Thrones. And there were the many overt anarchist and socialist experiments that were crushed by violence. And…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:39 AM
1

Actually, there has never been a period in history when capitalists did not rely on state power. Capital accrues to particular individuals/corporations, who then use the organized violence of the state to suppress their competitors. Sometimes they use private armies. It has nothing whatsoever to do with workers owning and controlling the means of production (socialism). Communism effectively replaces the corporation with the state, which obviously doesn't work either, as it maintains power in th…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:09 AM
3

It should be said that I also, however, keep in mind the other half of Ford's reasoning for disliking Unions, in that if you treat your workers right, they will in actuality want to work for you without complaint, and not have a need to organize in the first place. To me, a true paleoconservative would despise Henry Ford and wage-slavery in general. Paleo's tend to admire people like Adam Smith and Thomas Jefferson and Wilhelm von Humboldt, but they forget that these men were highly critical of …
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:46 AM
2

Also, the US government did indeed fund the Taliban through the Pakistani ISI. The relationship only grew sour when they eradicated the poppy crop and refused a pipeline. Thankfully, the poppy crop is now back to pre-Taliban levels, and the banks have their drug money.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:38 AM
4

When I say "Conservative", I'm not talking about the Neocon's that took over the Republican Party post-selling-out to Falwell and his ilk. I'm referring to the old-school brand of Conservatism favored by types such as Barry Goldwater. Fair enough. And yes I agree there are massive differences between neocons and libertarians/paleoconservatives. On the other hand, "traditional conservatives" were very much in favour of massive state power provided it was used to certain ends: policing, war, count…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:26 AM
3

The US and other Western nations (arguably all nations) are plutocracies/oligarchies. It is extremely common for elites to hold views that are radically at odds with the majority. Even when it's a very strong majority (ie 90% plus). George Carlin lays it down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ4SSvVbhLw
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:53 AM
-5

What is the "far right"? There is a good amount of consensus that the left wing comprises socialist and communist ideologies, there is no equivalent consensus of what constitutes the right wing or the far right. Actually the issue has been very well studied. You just need to turn off Rush Limbaugh and read a book by an academic.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:04 AM
1

fair enough.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:52 PM
2

Authoritarianism of the left is unrivaled. Go to China and try discussing the Tiananmen Square massacre. The left-wing shows again and again that everyone must engage in group-think otherwise they will be silenced. You should read up on any of the hundreds of far right governments funded and supported by the US during the Cold War. Common tactics included compiling lists of "internal enemies" (usually supplied by the CIA) -- which included priests and college professors -- torture, mass rape, de…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:48 PM
2

Conservatives are more likely to take a hands-off approach and let the private sector handle things, unless absolutely necessary. There isn't much evidence to support this assertion. Conservatives favour militarized police, massive military spending, unconstitutional attacks against left-radicals and Muslims by the FBI etc., more prisons, more intelligence agencies, less privacy, draconian drug laws, corporate welfare etc. Historically, conservatives have been at the forefront of using governmen…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:44 PM
2

Libertarian (of the American flavour) socialism rejects core tenets of socialism and wants to be market based Libertarianism in the American context is free market capitalism. Libertarian socialism predates both right-libertarianism and Marxism. It was the original socialism (and original libertarianism). Anarchism is similar to libertarian socialism, eg Chomsky sometimes describes himself as an anarcho-syndicalist or libertarian socialist. There are hundred different flavours of anarchism, most…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:06 PM
2

The Mujahadeen were funded by the State Department/CIA under both Carter and Reagan. There are even videos of Brzezinski meeting with (and praising) members of what would later become "Al-Qaeda."
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:27 PM
-2

Left-Libertarian would be anarchism or libertarian socialism.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:26 PM
1

heh, alrighty then.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:12 PM
11

Not all socialists are statists.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:20 PM
4

Experts (including the founder of the black ops arm inside CIA, George Kennan) are in agreement that Reagan actually prolonged the Cold War with his "evil empire" rhetoric and exorbitant military spending. It strengthened hardliners in the Soviet Union. Indeed Reagan almost caused WWIII with his belligerence during 1983.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:19 PM
3

Regardless of whether it's innate I see no reason why women shouldn't be shamed for toxic expressions of their sexuality. I mean, old men are shamed for dating 16 year old girls, even though it's technically legal in most states. There is such a thing as a happy balance, and attacking "nice guys" is clearly toxic.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:35 PM
9

That's strange, considering JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and other giant banks/corporations are currently funding feminist campaigns. One would almost think that elites fund feminism because it distracts everyone from class issues.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:30 PM
41

Classic. They care more about feminism than socialism. Feminism is like a virus. It has taken over socialism. It has taken over anarchism. It has taken over liberalism. And it has largely succeeded in taking over the church and conservatives, even though the latter groups ostensibly oppose feminism. Even the bloody Pope is now a feminist. I think I'm starting to realize why the CIA funded feminism. Forget about coups and death squads. Just send in the feminists.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:22 PM
7

There are plenty of nice sensitive ugly fat women who would disagree with this. Being non-obese is a must. Physical attractiveness is extremely important for males. Men don't lie about this. However men also find nice, sensitive women attractive; arrogance is extremely unattractive in a female. The reverse is true for women. Again, all of the studies demonstrate this. It is the profound disconnect between what women say they want and they actually want that causes the anger amongst "nice guys."
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:11 PM
9

The idea that men are penalized for being nice is just arrogant bullshit from men who refuse to acknowledge the real reasons that women don't have any genuine desire for them. There is no shortage at all of truly nice guys who are successful with women. They are generally also attractive and successful in other areas of their lives. This is partly true. I happen to be a quintessential nice guy and I've never had any problem with women. I was lucky enough to be born with certain other characteris…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 04:30 PM
18

It's quite fascinating. On the one hand feminists complain about "toxic masculinity" and demand that men be more sensitive and caring. Then they turn around and ridicule men who display these characteristics. It isn't difficult to see what's going on here. They are trying to justify their lack of attraction to certain people by projecting malevolence onto them. Instead of just admitting that sexual attraction is amoral they attribute sinister intent to "nice guys," thereby absolving themselves o…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:03 PM
5

Look out! It's a nice guy! Destroy him! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9XDb0nxSO4
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:59 PM
2

is certainly a result of feminism giving women the ability and motivation to enter the workforce and become breadwinners. Women were never denied the ability to enter the workforce. This is another feminist myth. Most women (understandably) didn't want to work. Eventually, time saving devices and birth control invented by men allowed bored rich women (aka feminists) to pursue careers.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:46 PM
13

Important article that will hopefully receive a lot of press. The professor was doing so well until... "Feminists and anti-racists recognize that identity does matter. This is indisputable. If we subscribe to the belief that ideas can be judged within a vacuum, uninfluenced by the social weight of their proponents, we perpetuate a system in which arbitrary markers like race and gender influence the perceived correctness of ideas. We can't overcome prejudice by pretending it doesn't exist. Focusi…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:24 PM
4

Interesting. I look forward to reading the full book. It's only a matter of time before the left rejects feminism en masse.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 03:06 PM
1

Take that racism elsewhere, bigot. That shit may fly on feminist sites, but we don't tolerate racism here.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter