TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_throwaway1260 Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by _throwaway1260 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This misses the point for me, the modern dating market in the west rewards short term male partners over long term ones. I believe the most productive core of the society are more long term material than short term, a society which doesn't serve it's productive core should fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 06:51 PM
0

Most communities are split evenly between the genders. there shouldn't be generally opening in a dating pool of a separate community to accommodate an uneven influx of men or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 05:22 PM
2

So I’m Looking at him last night and realized when I was pre-wall hot AF in my mid-20s, he was partying Chad in his mid-20s and now we both just aged, so if someone didn’t know our history, they might think that I settled with a high Beta bucks. Like he’s still attractive but he’s not tall, has some grey hair and is fit but not ripped, bit of a belly. Has a lot of money and lives in a nice place and he’s very generous financially. Good for you, you haven't practiced dual mating, you have went fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 12:44 PM
1

You're not entitled to a sea of pussy. Get over it. Of course I am over it, I have no complaints to women what so ever, naturally I won't ever get married, I will take all my earnings and spend them on young and attractive women, so there is no real issue as far as I am concerned. Men have far more noncommittal sex than women do. Get over it. Some do others don't, and again you probably get my drift in what way I am getting over that. Everyone settles. Get over it. There is no settling what so e…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:56 AM
1

The majority of men 18 to 24 are having sex and in relationships. This is an over simplification, it is better to look at this as the available dating pool of men and of women in that age.The asymmetry happens because more women are able to have non committed relationships with a small subset of men, it is ranging from mutual casual encounters to short term relationships in which knowingly and unknowingly the women are pumped and dumped. So the men's pool will be larger than the women's by at le…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:25 AM
1

If we're talking about Average Joe.... why couldn't he find a Plain Jane when he was 20? Because of the asymmetry in the dating market in the ages 18-30, it restricts the dating pool for young men who are not alphafux, also his potential of higher earnings has not materialized yet, so he is forced to wait either way if he wants to have the best partner he can. Men typically hate women who say that because the women who do are terrible. Same thing with guys who think women should "Be with him for…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 10:30 PM
1

Women do. Some do, a lot don't, which is enough to create an asymmetry in the dating market. I’ve met nerdy guys. A lot of them don't know how to socialize, especially to girls, and they don't know what hygiene is. Let's not focus on the anti social nerds, I am talking about the average joe who has a head in his shoulders and unsurprisingly starts earning 6 figures by the time he is in his 30's, there are enough of these cases as well. ”If you like me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 07:33 PM
1

No what you are saying is not the point, the point is that these so called nerds are negatively impacted in their 20's because of an opportunistic behavior, it doesn't really matter that there could be legitimate causes as a career or higher education, only the outcome matters here. Either you date from the get go with long term prospects in mind and try to gauge a man's potentially via such proxies as intelligence and academic success, if money is what will matter to you in the future, or you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 06:26 PM
9

Yes, the rich nerd is going to be more attractive than the broke supermodel-esque hotties with older and/or more relationship minded women. That is exactly what ticks men off, it is dual mating, alphafux in the 20's betabux in the 30's.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 07:29 PM
3

Depression I believe is a turn off for both genders, but anxiety might not be a turn off for men but a turn off for women, but that is just a hunch.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 01:37 AM
5

Will being content with being single go from being a helpful skill to a necessity? Yes that is where we are heading
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 01:21 AM
1

Interesting.. wouldn't really have guessed that these types of men would be active on Tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 12:37 AM
1

Yeah I figured, I still tend to believe that young people in this age are either in a state of non-monogamy or a state of pseudo-monogamy which is being falsely described as monogamy. Until you force men and women to marry which is caused by various societal pressures, there are no real long term pairings.It is similar to a game of musical chairs. While the music is still playing everyone will always have chairs given enough waiting time, only when the music truly stops the real losers emerge. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 11:16 PM
1

Good point as well
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 08:54 PM
1

If you are correct then the data doesn't really add up I agree, It is hard to get a good read on things because time of celibacy isn't usually factored in, just the amount of partners. For instance, let's say we have 3 men and 3 women and in the span of 3 years, the 3 women all date the same man but at different times, it would be difficult to describe these women as truly celibate since each had dated in a period of 3 years, but 2 out of 3 men were fully celibate. Maybe such a dynamic might exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 08:09 PM
1

A majority of women don't stay on OLD. So how can it be a subset of women, which implies it's a minor portion of women? Not too sure of that, look at https://blog.apptopia.com/dating-apps-male-dominated, The ratio in Match, Okc and Tinder are not that far from 50/50 split. If it's the women that stay on OLD that do this, they're the one's that do different from the majority, yet you imply that they are the standard. Not sure I follow your point
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 07:04 PM
1

I have a theory that might explain it, there are 2 disaffected groups. 1) A very large subset of men (18-30) who are in the bottom 80%. 2) A subset of women who are not looking to hook up and also are very negatively affected by the dangers of being pumped and dumped. Both of these groups are somewhat driven away from OLD, the first one because the lack of success, the second one because the risk of getting pumped and dumped in modern dating market is considerably higher than in the past. So pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 04:12 PM
3

Marrying before 25 had very high divorce rates. The best ages for marriage is between 25 to 32. You can't really determine that from the data when projecting to what would of happened if all men and women were to marry young, there might be a correlation between low social economic status and marrying young for instance.. correlation doesn't equal causation. Looking at sex statistics, if Chads and incles are based on sex partners acquired, there’s more Chad than there are incels, even at 18 to 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 06:03 PM
1

We are going in circles here, you are entitled to have your personal definitions, but you are not classifying a large number of RP men correctly, you don't really understand their motivation if you believe traditionalism is any way related , but again that is your personal choice to misclassify any group you desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:46 PM
1

To sum it up for you. If they were never tradcon they’d be whores with no care for the institution of marriage like the standard casanova. The % of men would be able to achieve it is close to the top 1 perhaps, so I don't see your argument there. Instead they harp on it and then bitching about it is because they had hopes of participating in that whole thing. Phrasing it in this manner would be equivalent to saying that the poor are bitching because they had hopes of becoming rich. Again it has …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 08:38 AM
1

It's zero because of their ignorance. That's the whole point. They think they need to get a women on app, where they could go to a prostitute without any issues. Those minority or guys that fuck majority of women on these apps are worse off than getting a prostitute. So you meant to say that their real value should be 0 if men would of behaved rationally and not like pathetic beggars, yeah with that I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 08:34 AM
1

hemselves by pointing to what they feel is a reduced quality of women Well it is a reduced quality of women for a large subset of men, do you want to argue otherwise? just look at the median marriage age which is close to 28, assuming the average man is not that successful in the modern SMV and is not able to get a quality partner in the ages of 18-28, then from his POV he is most definitely getting reduced quality of women, since the woman he is about to marry has less to offer in terms of yout…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 12:54 AM
1

Why do you assume it's a waifu and not simply having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 11:50 PM
2

Women's SMV is not zero, just log into any dating app and you will actually see that actually Men's SMV is close to 0. Did you mean that women's DMV is close to 0?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:58 PM
1

You are free to define terms in any fashion you desire, but you will get inaccuracies when mapping your definitions onto reality. There is a stark difference between men being red pilled because of the asymmetry in the SM and tradcons, so your belief that all RP men want a virgin waifu and nuclear family is simply not correct. You just refuse to see that these are 2 different groups of men for a reason I don't fully understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:55 PM
1

All redpill men are tradcon according to your personal definition, but your personal definition is not the one RP men use. When you say someone is traditional you imply that he is not adapting to changes due to an ideology or a belief that the past was better, even if this change could be regarded as positive for him or even neutral. In this case I can't see how you definitely know that this is the case with all RP men, some men might be old fashioned but others might believe that in current day…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 05:23 PM
1

The question is not whether they are all tradcon at their core according to your definition, the question is what attitude do they have towards childfree women and these categories of men have probably statistically distinguishable views on the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 11:24 PM
1

You seem to be projecting, this description doesn't sound even remotely close to what the majority of men are looking for in a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 07:22 PM
0

You are setting yourself in a trap in which you can't distinguish between the tradcucks that are usually talked about in this sub and other RP men, and thus you are arriving to the false conclusion that all RP men have a disdain towards childfree women. While it could be the case that all RP men fall under your personal definition of traditional, your definition is not the one commonly used in the sub, which means that RP men are split between ones that will have a negative opinion of child free…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 07:15 PM
1

You are redefining what traditional means, these are just rational men who refuse to accept a poor bargain, there is nothing traditional about it, if you refuse to buy a bicycle for the price of a car, I wouldn't call you traditional just because other women in the past used to buy bicycles all the time, what I would call you is rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 07:03 PM
1

ridiculous, you can't call men who believe in being forever bachelors or purchasing sex instead of getting married, traditional in any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 06:57 PM
4

You are repeating what trads are saying, I am sure that this is not the opinion of non trad red pilled men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 05:27 PM
2

MGTOW shouldn't obviously have anything negative to say about childfree women, perhaps trad red pilled men will have something negative to say, but childfree women are usually just not the focus, since there isn't anything opportunistic about childfree women so there is no cause to warn men about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:12 PM
2

Why would the manosphere have something against childless women, childless women are not the ones who divorce rape or practice dual mating
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:07 PM
1

How do you know that specifically being nice is what is holding you back with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 11:24 PM
1

I don't believe it is correct to look at the dating market in an individualistic lense but rather more in an aggregate one. Let's say that 40% of women are promiscuous in their 20's but will sleep only with top 10% of men. This forces 90% of men to compete over 60% of women in the monogamous market in their 20's. Which means that this society pretty much fucks over men for more than a decade when they are in their prime. What might be relevant to what you are seeing, is that average men have a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 11:44 AM
1

Alphas and Betas are for the most part western terms, arranged marriages are not a western practice
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 09:53 AM
0

No the focus on high n-count women, is because high n-count women's behavior can be regarded as opportunistic in modern dating market
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 05:42 PM
5

What is wrong with paying for sex? it is an excellent alternative for marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 04:51 PM
1

This is not why high n-count women are shamed. High n-count women are shamed because of their opportunistic behavior, once they hit the wall they do settle for the most part, so if you have 40% of women who fuck alphas in their 20's and settle in their 30's, you are left with bottom 80% of men who are younger than 30 competing in the monogamous dating market over only 60% of women which in best case would leave 20% of men without a mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 04:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter