TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aClearCrystal Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by aClearCrystal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The shooter is trans male (assigned female at birth). OP (probably intentionally) misgendered him.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:31 PM
1

It's unreasonable to use the term "nazi" as a synonym for "bad". If you mean to say that a certain ideology is bad, just say that. No need to make a false comparison.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:26 PM
1

Yes, the services of the future are indeed a hope.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:49 AM
1

Such as the services that exist in a matter of years, not now.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:12 AM
1

Could you please summarize the content of what you said to me? My summary: you're a [personal attack] you do [personal attack] you don't do [personal attack] (all of which I've disproven, but that's besides the point) You didn't even attempt to deny that your original comment is sexist. Because you know it's true. Insulting and attacking someone is not rational criticism. Telling you that a conment is objectively (no subjectivity needed) sexist, and telling you how you can easily change that wit…
/r/MensRights19/01/23 08:00 PM
0

I'm not here to help. I'm here to educate myself. (And I enjoy calling out sexists like you on the side.) But now you're really starting to dig deep to find something you can consider bad about me \<sup>\</sup>^ Do you really want to try this hard to find something to personally attack people with, instead if just taking the criticism and editing your sexist comment? I hope you're young, so you still have some years to learn how to accept criticism. But hey, if it makes you feel better: I am ind…
/r/MensRights19/01/23 07:17 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/YouShouldKnow/comments/x1j32x/ysk_someone_being_homophobic_does_not_mean_theyre/imf6oho/ A comment where I held someone accountable for sexism against men in the exact same way as I held you accountable. Now please stop making stupid arguments.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:51 AM
0

You've looked at my entire comment history? You could look at my comment history and assume that I care less about sexism against men. Or you could assume that I simply encounter it less often. It's the latter. (Which doesn't necessarily mean that sexism against men is overall less prevalent. But it is less prevalent in the communities I participate in.) ("holding men and women accountable" - I nearly never know the gender of who I'm talking to on Reddit.)
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:05 AM
0

Lemme just quickly go and talk to every sexist human on earth
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:53 AM
0

I do not know OP's gender, therefore it does not matter when holding them accountable.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:32 AM
-1

tfw you start insulting people because you're incapable of acknowledging your sexist behaviour Keep hiding behind ignorance. Otherwise you might happen to become a better person. boohoo some feminist across the world was mean to me stop being so triggered my man
/r/MensRights18/01/23 10:52 PM
-1

You should stop being sexist. Who I am does not matter at all for this statement. But for your entertainment, I'll tell you a little. I'm a man. I'm not a woman. I know "how men feel when feminists say things like [that]". You simply make up things to avoid taking responsibility for [what I would consider hate speech]. If you look into my comment history, you'll see that I defend all groups that I happen to see attacked. I defend men, women, liberals, conservatives, etc. when they are unfairly a…
/r/MensRights18/01/23 10:36 PM
0

I assume this is meant to be a joke, but I'd ask you not to spread sexist views, even if you may deem them to be of little significance.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 02:42 PM
1

Please put a limiter, for example "many", in front of your second paragraph. As it stands right now, your comment is but sexist.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 02:33 PM
4

Hmm that sounds a little sexist
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:20 PM
10

Don't mix human rights with economic systems. Communism does not oppose men's rights and capitalism does not advocate men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 12:26 PM
-1

women aren't made for the battlefield Am I correct to translate this to "women are made to be submissive servants serving me, a strong man"?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 07:17 AM
1

Tate bad.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 10:36 AM
6

Quote from the second page of the report: The contents of this publication can in no way reflect the views or policies of UNODC or contributory organizations, nor do they imply any endorsement.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 10:57 PM
3

Conscription of women is unconsitutional in Germany.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 06:56 AM
1

While discrediting people who express valid points is a common strategy, not just "feminist/liberal/woke" people utilize it. Please don't artificially make this sub hateful.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:08 AM
1

Don't blindly attack people.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:00 AM
8

Parents shouldn't kill their children. Parents shouldn't beat their children. Parents shouldn't give their children drugs. Parents shouldn't neglect their children. Parents shouldn't cut off their children's skin. Only one of these things is legal.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 06:04 PM
11

Every force-circumcised person's parents are at fault. And it's the nation's fault they are allowed to continue to act that way.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:16 PM
-24

Not all LGBT+ people are homosexual. Many LGBT+ people, like bisexuals or transsexuals can date heterosexual people.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 07:17 PM
1

It still doesn't make sense. Child support is for buying clothes etc. for the child. Fetuses don't wear clothes.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:52 PM
2

I didn't read the article, but in the headline it only says "sexual harassment", nothing about sexism.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/22 07:41 PM
1

inverse r/menandfemales ?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 02:08 PM
2

I'm not sure if you're saying that boobs specifically should not need to be covered or if you're saying that no body part should need to be covered. If you're saying no body part should need to be covered, that's a valid opinion. If you're specifically asking why boobs should need to be covered, let me ask you: Why should any body part be covered?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 09:45 PM
-2

Most men's nipples can not be sexually stimulated There is a reason I put a "most" there. Yes, every body part is sexually stimulating to someone. But for most people, the highly sexually stimulative parts are limited to some few. Also r/menandfemales
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:08 PM
0

If your hands are as sexually stimulatable as your genitals, maybe you should cover your hands too.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:00 PM
0

All you're saying is that "erogenous zones" cover other zones too. What i meant when saying "ergoenous zones" was zones that are common to be very sexually stimulating. Those zones are limited to genitalia, buttholes and female nipples. About being nude at the beach: There is nothing wrong with saying people should be allowed to be nude in certain situations. But saying genitals need to be covered but female nipples don't simply lacks understanding as to why we cover certain body parts.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:40 PM
1

Do you expect buttholes to be hidden? Buttholes do not need to be hidden "for cleanliness reasons". (That is, unless you're afraid that they're not properly cleaned. Which is something you could say about every body part.) (Just in case you say buttholes should not need to be hidden: Laws are not made for you, but for the general public. And the general public does say buttholes should be hidden.) About erogenous zones: I meant to say zones which are common to be very sexually stimulative. Those…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:36 PM
1

Necks are not common to be sexually stimulated. If you say people should not need to cover themselves, sure. If you say people should cover everything, sure. But if you say there is a certain amount of areas that must be covered, you should explain on what principle you base your selection of body parts. The body parts that are commonly expected to be covered follow the following principle: If it is very common for that body part to act as a recipient for strong sexual stimulation, that body par…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:29 PM
-6

Perhaps I should have clarified that what I meant was "zones that are common to be sexually stimulating (not just erotic) to be touched". But I assume you already knew what I meant and started digging into definitions just to avoid having to justify your position.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:03 PM
1

It is not sexist. We cover all erogenous zones. Erogenous zones include: Genitalia, buttholes, female nipples. That's the reason. (Most) female nipples can be sexually stimulated, (most) male nipples not. It has nothing to do with sexism.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:29 PM
-14

Female nipples are erogenous zones. Male nipples are not. They are not the same. They are not equal. It does not make sense to treat them as equal, unless you don't care about people showing their erogenous zones (including genitalia and buttholes) in public.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:26 PM
-10

The reason female nipples are considered sexual is because they are erogenous zones. Most women's nipples can be sexually stimulated. That's a fact. Most men's nipples can not be sexually stimulated. That's also a fact. We cover all body parts that can be sexually stimulated. Those include genitalia, buttholes, and female nipples.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:25 PM
15

They also (likely) exited through a vagina at birth. That does not mean anything. While I personally don't care about women being topless in public, I can understand that some/many people do not want others to show their erogenous zones in public. I assume you agree that showing genitalia in public should be forbidden or at least limited. The reason for that is that they are erogenous zones. So are female nipples.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:20 PM
2

Explaination: It isn't about the word itself. The issue lays in the sentence context. If you say "women and boys", while talking about people of the same age, some men may find that to be belittleing, because it seems like it means to imply the men didn't mature. At the same time, no one would find the word "boys" offensive if you were to say "girls and boys". There are many such words, where if you don't use equivalent terms for the different groups you're referencing, it seems like you are try…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 09:54 PM
3

Explaination: It isn't about the word itself. The issue lays in the sentence context. If you say "women and boys", while talking about people of the same age, some men may find that to be belittleing, because it seems like it means to imply the men didn't mature. At the same time, no one would find the word "boys" offensive if you were to say "girls and boys". There are many such words, where if you don't use equivalent terms for the different groups you're referencing, it seems like you are try…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 09:52 PM
1

Well then you're obviously one of the few HVM out there and unlike all the other men. /s
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:47 PM
1

Are you trying to imply that women not actively seeking out sexist women must be sexist themselves?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter