TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aGorilla Archive

View 1 posts and 104 comments by aGorilla on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

aGorilla/r/MensRights12/02/10 03:56 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Religion.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:22 PM
-2

Actually, I doubt you laughed your ass off. I'm inclined to think your ass was amputated.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:22 PM
1

But... I'm the white guy!
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:28 AM
8

OK, I'll go.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:20 PM
10

Trigger also notes how the boy's classmates throw lavish birthday parties and Bar/Bat Mitzvahs, the likes of which she can't afford to compete with given the amount Cryer provides her. Put him in public school. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:46 AM
4

What the hell does that even mean?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:15 PM
2

Here's a thought, how about both of them shut the fuck up, and stop using a 4 year old as their personal political pawn.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:44 PM
4

If that title doesn't work, you could always go with Rampart.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:06 AM
7

On the bright side, it's "fair and balanced", since it tries to offend both genders equally.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:35 PM
2

Cameras are ok: I would be more than fine doing such a job with hidden cameras around the place Cameras not ok: in fact I wouldn't be comfortable with that because of the kids being filmed too
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:43 AM
2

Did you just change your mind in the middle of a sentence, and hit submit anyway? I've seen a lot on reddit, but that was a new one.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:38 AM
0

You should re-read your comment, then find a mirror and have a frank conversation with yourself. No hurry, we'll still be here.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:31 AM
10

You can't say "same crime" when they haven't listed what the charges are for each defendant. Your headline is just one massive assumption, with no facts to back it up.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 03:50 PM
1

Agreed. To be clear, I'm not talking about Libertarians. Conservatives don't seem to want them around these days.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:54 PM
5

That just rules out American conservatives.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:03 PM
-1

So tell him all of that, and then thank him for this stance.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:02 PM
3

How do we get the media to start reporting on men's rights issues?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:38 AM
7

Agreed. It's also not necessary in this case. I can't picture that title, minus the 'upvote this', lingering at the bottom of the pile. This post was pretty much guaranteed to get upvotes.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:35 AM
17

That's an excellent point. Don't charge them if they confess, but do charge them if you catch them without a confession. It's not perfect (what is?), but it's probably the best we can do.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:01 PM
1

See #3 here.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:45 PM
5

This comment scares me. I think I'm going to have to report it.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:42 PM
-1

It's ok, they promptly apologized to him for the disturbance.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:51 AM
1

Thanks for the suggestion, but the problem's already been solved.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 08:45 PM
0

For starters, I wouldn't do it in this subreddit, because very few of it's readers believe that myth. I also wouldn't do it with this article, because it has little to do with that myth, particularly, if you don't know the full story behind it. This post, without context, is just a celebration of a woman being arrested. Anybody that thinks that's ok, probably is morally inferior to most women. If you actually want to dispel myths, you need to post something that is actually relevant, and post it…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:18 PM
2

Ad hominem much?
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:54 PM
-3

It may belong here, with context. Without context, it's just another "a goody! another cunt got arrested!" story. This place is full of shit like that. You are part of that problem. I bitched about you arbitrarily banning people, you admitted that you did it, but never explained why, or (to my knowledge) apologized to the person you banned. No need to ban me now, as long as you're running this circlejerk, I won't be coming back.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:51 PM
2

Ok, so every woman that does something wrong to a man, and is punished for it, get's a post in here? I didn't know that was how it worked. Unsubscribed.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:13 PM
-4

I didn't see the original post, but if it was in the main reddit, then the response to it should probably also be there. Seeing this posted here, without any context, just looks like we're trying to make all women look bad, by focusing on the bad actions of one woman.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 02:13 PM
-2

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/10/10 01:28 PM
6

I hope it wasn't criticizing. It wasn't, which surprised me. Which is kind of a shame, this place needs more positive submissions (like yours).
/r/MensRights25/09/10 03:56 PM
2

Yeah, I got that, and I agree with it. It just took me a minute.
/r/MensRights25/09/10 03:54 PM
4

I'm so used to this subreddit being a nest of negativity, that I assumed this post was criticizing your question, and I didn't understand why.
/r/MensRights25/09/10 03:43 PM
0

Much like the folks out west handle the endangered species act... Shoot, shovel, shut up. You have my condolences.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 01:56 AM
5

AMA?
/r/MensRights19/09/10 09:53 PM
16

Virtually every female reporter I know acts and dresses in a conservative and appropriate manner while on the job. Yeah, except this one.
/r/MensRights15/09/10 03:36 AM
4

You work for Lyndon Johnson?
/r/MensRights15/09/10 03:23 AM
1

I really did like it, it's the perfect 'literal' translation of it. When I read it, I thought "Damn! That's what it actually means!" For the record, it was "owness" (hope you don't mind).
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:13 PM
7

It's "onus", but I actually like your take on it.
/r/MensRights03/09/10 04:04 PM
1

Really, if he wanted to go there, it should have been with the He-Man Women Haters Club.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 01:31 AM
4

One of them was the saddest thing I have ever seen on television. It was about a woman who watched her mother in law die from a horrible disease, followed by her husband, and when it caught up with her sons, she killed them. She did the right thing. edit: corrections & link
/r/MensRights23/08/10 01:56 PM
-4

Ok, I'll take your word for it, and retract my accusation. When I only saw two people commenting, and one of them getting downvoted, it looked suspicious.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 03:58 PM
-5

Stop downvoting the guy you are arguing with, and I'll take you more seriously. You both have valid points.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 02:55 PM
9

I tend to agree that emotional attachment has a bigger impact. It's more powerful, and lasts longer, than a purely physical attraction.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 02:56 PM
3

Similar gender specific laws applied in other jurisdictions and reflected a pattern repeated throughout out law making and dating back as far as AD 760, the court was told. Way to lower the bar. On the bright side, I guess we can burn her as a witch.
/r/MensRights26/03/10 09:33 PM
4

Hell, I defended her in another thread. edit: Oddly enough, against Gareth321, but I didn't know the history. That said, I stand behind the post. I'm tired of the Saydrah bashing, it's pretty pointless.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 11:43 PM
1

I don't agree with the explanation, I was just pointing it out.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 10:35 PM
2

They explain it in the "Analysis" box on the right: Junaid Abuhamza has schizophrenia and although he was fit to appear in court it was agreed by three psychiatrists that he will require lifelong support and monitoring. It is also agreed he could suffer a relapse in the future which would mean he would pose a risk to the public. It was because of this risk that an indeterminate sentence, called Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), was imposed.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 05:42 PM
9

That bitch deserves to be battered, and deep fried.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 04:06 AM
3

http://www.slate.com/id/2152487/?nav=ais
/r/MensRights26/02/10 03:01 PM
1

Daddy, you'd never hurt mommy, would you? Well son, that's up to mommy, now isn't it?
/r/MensRights26/02/10 02:51 PM
1

Fair enough. I hang out in /r/libertarian too. I guess my take on this was, either do a site for both, or for neither, having only one site is pure sexism.
/r/MensRights12/02/10 10:11 PM
1

Yeah, but I'm more worried about the future of Haiti. Not that I have any idea what either of those have to do with this post.
/r/MensRights12/02/10 09:19 PM
6

The point is that the US government is using taxpayer dollars to build a website about health for women, but not for men.
/r/MensRights12/02/10 12:40 PM
7

Why do we have to care 'more'? I thought it was all about 'equal'.
/r/MensRights12/02/10 04:25 AM
2

Obvious sarcasm was not so obvious.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:07 PM
1

NSFW! Or did you expect us to know that?
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:57 AM
4

I dunno, it was pretty harmless, and at least a little witty. I don't think it comes close to calling someone gay (unless 'Klingon' is some sort of code speak these days). I agree with you most of the time, but this time, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 06:21 PM
3

Sad, but true. We can still try though.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 03:18 AM
4

I didn't mean enemy literally. I get what your saying, but it's still not my style. Funny is funny, no matter who says it, or why. If you make me smile, you get an upvote. If for no other reason, it's rewarding good behavior.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 02:08 AM
4

Yeah, but I still think the klingon crack was pretty funny. I'll upvote my worst enemy, if they make me laugh. But that's just me.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 01:52 AM
8

Why the downmods? This was funny, and led to more funny below it. edit: typo
/r/MensRights08/02/10 10:56 PM
6

Can we all get along? -- Rodney King
/r/MensRights08/02/10 10:02 PM
17

You make a cute couple. Are you both single?
/r/MensRights08/02/10 09:56 PM
2

Title seems a bit misleading. I didn't see any "buying" of anything, just the repetition of what this wingnut said.
/r/MensRights07/02/10 09:36 PM
11

Even while he admits the obvious. The judge acknowledged a possible double-standard with the sentencing. If the incident involved a man who committed similar acts against an unwilling woman, that man would doubtless face prison time, Judge Donald Poppy said.
/r/MensRights03/02/10 07:39 PM
3

The ad, in the middle of the page, is beyond irony.
/r/MensRights26/01/10 03:36 PM
2

Am i a randroid under the skin?! Probably. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.
/r/MensRights20/11/09 05:00 AM
1

If more people had minds as open as hers is, we wouldn't need so many subreddits.
/r/MensRights11/11/09 02:03 PM
1

Particularly nice that it was so well said, by a woman.
/r/MensRights11/11/09 01:35 PM
1

I understand your point, but it's kind of like taking a stand against welfare, but saying that since it's around, you're going to apply for it. I'd much prefer we try to get rid of the bad laws, rather than extend them. The more cases they cover, the more likely they are to stick around. I think your heart's in the right place, but your head is in a place where "the means justify the end", and that's not such a great place to be.
/r/MensRights29/10/09 04:50 PM
2

You can't fight a bad law with more bad laws. Pot's illegal, let's make all plants illegal!
/r/MensRights29/10/09 01:01 PM
-1

The whole concept of "hate crimes" is idiotic. We should be against them, even they support our "cause".
/r/MensRights29/10/09 03:40 AM
1

She raised it as an issue (twice), but didn't seem to suggest a solution. I have no idea if she's said that elsewhere though.
/r/MensRights27/10/09 06:07 PM
1

I don't think women are owed state subsidized child care I don't think she said that, at least not in this article.
/r/MensRights27/10/09 05:15 PM
1

My attempt at a translation. I hate the MensRights subreddit. It makes the whole gender issue appear cultish, and makes its members look like 'the crazies'. Articles like this should be posted on Equality, or directly to reddit itself. The MensRights readers already know what the deal is, but if more people saw articles like this, they just might become aware of the problems we face.
/r/MensRights27/10/09 05:13 PM
4

Great, now I'm in love with another octogenarian. First it was Grace Hopper, and now this...
/r/MensRights27/10/09 12:56 PM
2

Leave it to New Jersey to fuck up fucking.
/r/MensRights27/10/09 03:13 AM
5

Good! It's about time these girls learn how to defend themselves from feminists.
/r/MensRights14/10/09 08:10 PM
2

Why are male teachers afraid of pedophiles? They're not coming after them.
/r/MensRights29/09/09 07:26 PM
1

I'm ashamed I haven't read it. I got lost in Tale of Two Cities, Bleak House, David Copperfield, and Old Curiosity Shop, and never made it to that one. Where's my Kindle...
/r/MensRights28/09/09 04:35 AM
3

Then keep your wife out of Australia. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights25/09/09 01:12 PM
7

The victim, who is now 22, attended the plea hearings and told the judge that she approved of the plea agreements.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 07:45 PM
4

I think he should ask his doctor if a sex change is right for him.
/r/MensRights31/05/09 01:40 AM
3

Agreed, but you should have saved Israel for last, or left it off completely.
/r/MensRights31/05/09 01:38 AM
0

I think there's some truth to that. Would also explain some of the Isreal/Palestine issues.
/r/MensRights28/05/09 12:30 PM
1

Upmodded, but, the same should be true for the man.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:51 AM
3

I had a girlfriend that had an abortion. It was against my wishes, and we broke up soon after that (my choice). I suppose it's better than if she had a kid against my wishes, which I would then be forced to support, but either way, I hated the fact that I had no say in the matter. I wanted a kid, and I still do, but that's not going to happen.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:50 AM
3

The funniest part, was this ad.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 12:42 AM
-2

Fuckface, I'm not a feminist, not in the least (I'd tell you how much I'm not a feminist, but that would border on TMI). That said, this headline was a piece of shit, that doesn't help the situation. And take your trolling comment, and go fuck yourself with that. I've been here 3 years, you've been here 2 months. Save it for somebody who gives a shit. It's wonderful that you have a site that supports the cause, but if this is your level of support, you're probably doing more harm. Oh, and please…
/r/MensRights20/05/09 03:20 AM
0

ps: If you think that using hyperbole is a good thing in this situation, you're wrong. All it does is send a signal to women that we are the idiots that they already think we are. Feel free to complain about this site, and I'll back you up, but claim that it is the "most vile idea ever", and you look like an idiot.
/r/MensRights20/05/09 02:58 AM
-1

My "reason to believe" is based on 44 years of life experience, and being a news/stats junkie. Yours? Experience is helpful in debates, sarcasm isn't. Neither are insults, and on that note, go fuck yourself. Then you you'll be a victim of rape, and can falsely accuse yourself of rape. Don't forget to report back to us with the results.
/r/MensRights20/05/09 02:43 AM
-1

And the same could be said for rape victims. I'd say they're equally evil, but I have reason to believe that rape happens more often than false charges of rape. Not to mention, if you could (in a magical world) eliminate rape, then false charges of rape would lose a bit of credibility.
/r/MensRights20/05/09 02:03 AM
2

I think you have the ranking off, just a bit... Vile ideas: The act of rape. False claims of rape. A website that allows false claims of rape. I agree, it's a bad idea, but I don't think it's the "most vile idea ever", I save that phrase for things like slavery, the holocaust, and the use of atomic weapons (note: I did say like, this is not an all-inclusive list).
/r/MensRights19/05/09 05:10 PM
1

Works for me :)
/r/MensRights08/05/09 02:18 PM
1

It was posted to MensRights, the title is clearly sarcasm. edit: you downmodded me for agreeing with you?
/r/MensRights08/05/09 02:13 PM
2

Kind of hard to believe, considering where it was posted.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 02:07 PM
1

If she's my girlfriend, she's a psycho. 20 plus years of statistics can't be wrong.
/r/MensRights20/04/09 04:19 PM
1

Thanks again. Google search suggested Women Behind Bars, and that made no sense in this context.
/r/MensRights20/04/09 12:57 AM
1

Come to think of it, that might be worthy of a feature suggestion - optional 'FAQ' tab for each sub-reddit. and while I'm here... what's WBB? You should use fewer TLA's for those of us not in the know.
/r/MensRights20/04/09 12:35 AM
1

Ah, thanks. Thought I was blind, or stupid. Not going to rule out that last one yet.
/r/MensRights20/04/09 12:18 AM
1

Where are these? I have custom styles turned on, and I'm not seeing these links.
/r/MensRights20/04/09 12:08 AM
1

Well, prison isn't the only answer, or necessarily the best - even when a crime is involved. It's an idea that's centuries old, and we haven't really spent a lot of time considering other options. Another way to reduce crimes, is eliminate them. Why are prostitution, gambling, or doing drugs illegal? Does prison solve any of them?
/r/MensRights19/04/09 11:10 PM
2

s/mother/parent/, and I'd be all for it. Less imprisonment (all around) is generally a good thing.
/r/MensRights19/04/09 05:27 PM
7

Not guilty, by reason of statistics. Interesting idea. Thoroughly fucked up, but interesting.
/r/MensRights19/04/09 02:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter