TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aMutantChicken Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by aMutantChicken on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If men have a way out of parental obligations, no. Ideally you should tell her you plan on not supporting her in case of divorce so she has all the information in her abortion decision.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:34 PM
3

Where can I send my resume for a CEO position? It seems to be something I can just ask for according to these people.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 04:29 PM
2

and this is weird considering that if men oppress women as some would want us to believe, then when a husband dies in a war, his wife should be free of her oppressor no?
/r/MensRights30/06/19 03:49 AM
2

i got a hypothesis about this; you know how women prefer venting about problems rather than doing something about it? i think it's because some people are inherently unhappy, but realizing you are the cause of your oen unhappiness feels wrong so in so long as you have describable problems you can convince yourself that those are the reasons for your unhappiness. in this case, she doesn't have problems yet feels unhappy, so she has to realize the truth about herself which feels like shit. She wan…
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:51 PM
2

YOU'RE BREATH TAKING! this was your random compliment of the day :)
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:47 PM
4

i know it's shitty, but that's how you reach regular people. With calls to woman's suffering.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:45 PM
2

i will identify as a woman for just a second...
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:40 PM
1

i was never asked to testify since i was 3. I do know my mom get 3 professional to diagnose my dad with being violent even though they never met him in person at any point (and i can testify he wasn't now). She basically won initially because ''can't seperate child and mother'' and because he fought fair but she didn't. Then it was a matter of repeatedly going to court to fight again and again for custody until he couldn't afford it anymore. It took him decades to wipe those debts. I can easily …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 05:56 PM
1

Not gonna give names but i was the child in one of the situation. Another case was a family member, another a coworker and then we have the ANCQ (in Quebec) which is incapable of getting money from the government because they help men primarily that has lists of horror stories like that. Many men don't try to get custody because they know it's a long shot that will cost many thousands of dollars.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 05:50 PM
1

i know a guy that tried because he cared but every time the woman came back with new allegations, got majority custody, then he had to go back in court to get equal custody until she came back with a false criminal allegation. Years of legal battle. My own dad went through the same shit but had to let go of hoping to get equal custody because he simply couldn't both pay his lawyers and eat anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 10:35 PM
1

yes i do. for example, i could see how my mother lied about how my father treated me. On another case, ''he has a touch lock on his computer" (which came in build in) doesn't equate to "he must have a secret porn folder that unlocks with touch ID".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 10:32 PM
1

there is way less incentives not to if you are a woman. The probability of never seeing your kids again is waaaaay lower and the probability of being forced to pay your ex is also slim. Married women get to claim to be accustomed to a way of living and recieve money if their husband is rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 03:04 AM
1

all the men i know that don't see their children would do just that if the mother wasn't hell bent on getting full custody to the point of lying. I've seen my share of unsubstanciated claims of inapropriate conduct for which i know for a fact were false. Still it did convince a lot of people that had the power to influence a judge. i even know a case where a claim of death threat was used to take a child away from the father. I know nobody gave these claims any credibility outside the courthouse…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 03:02 AM
0

you read wrong. Men that leave cause problems, women that make it so their ex can't see the kids despite them wanting to are a problem too. Single parents prevent their children from seing 2 adults cohabit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 02:59 AM
2

depends on where you live.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 02:56 AM
1

and the only cases i know personnaly are of women using false claims to get full custody. I've had people like that in my famity and at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 02:56 AM
1

i would assume the likelyhood of problems could be similar (since the kid may remember the father of her ex, which he doesn't like anymore). That said, the kid will be raised also by all the women teachers, which is not the same situation since when you don't have a father at home, you also donM't have male mentors at school most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 02:34 PM
6

when he does, yes, but most of divorces are initiated by the mother. And most often it's the mother demanding full custody. Believe me, there are thousands of fathers that would give everything to see their children again but are blocked from doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 02:30 PM
5

the phrase ''i fear him'' can shorten this to a few minutes. you see, false claims of violence will give automatic custody to the mother until that matter is resolve, which itself can take years (i've witnessed it myself). And when it's over, well the kids are used to staying with mommy so it would be bad for them to change that, or so says the judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 02:27 PM
4

divordes are majoritarily initiated by the woman. As for avoiding single mothers, i'm already short feeding myself so if i see a lady on Tinder that claims her profession is ''stay at home mom'', i avoid that. Can't be feeding 3 mouths on my own. And there is the risk of divorce and her demanding money for herself and the kid. Too dangerous financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 02:25 PM
0

well, it's hard to pin the problem on men since most children don't have men as fathers or even teachers until they are adults. Many are raised exclusively by women so how can it be men's fault if they turn bad? I think that women that hate men also hate boys (because they are future men) and the boys that are raised by these women grow up to hate women because women hated them all their lives (to their knowledge since women as a whole are not like that).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 02:22 PM
2

men and women are probably as likely to be violent, but since we wiew men are more dangerous when violent we raise our boys telling them to control their violence which we seem to rarely do with our girls. Like when we keep telling boys that it's never ok to hit a girl but never tell girls it's never ok to hit boys. Many girls deduce from this that they can hit boys without getting hit back and to an extent they would be right.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 03:13 PM
2

Women are way more likely to kill their children because ''they can't live without me'', while men will spend all their day at work to be sure their kids get food on the table even though they must sacrifice their desire to be with them. Men sacrifice themselves for their children on the daily for their children, they just do it differently and perhaps that's why you don't see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 03:05 PM
1

because society doesn't care about men. This forces them to grow a thicker skin, which in turn leads them to achieve more or die trying. Then all you see is successful men without seeing the hardships that lead to success nor do you see all the casualties in the form of homelessness of men being massively bigger and harder thatn the one women experience on average.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:48 AM
3

proof that the whole "not being taken seriously" isn't just working against women but sometimes is a huge privilege under certain circumstances.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:20 AM
2

if you present yourself in a sexual way, don't cry when i see your shell as a sexual thing. Anyway, to an extent, you body IS a sexual object. It is not only that, but it is in part that. You are both a person and a sexual being. Denying any of those 2 parts is dumb.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:55 PM
1

i get that given the possibility of an allegation being real, you would want to limit interactions between the 2 involved. But there are ways to deal with this without destroying someone's life preemptively.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:53 PM
2

AND any random concussion or injure can end your career.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:50 PM
1

A) dosn'T make much of a difference B) some interpret it otherwise. Note that the 1st reason this lawyer states, it that it's the law to correctly gender someone. The law doesn't intend it to be a hate crime to misuse pronouns, but the letter of the law is vague enough to be interpreted that way. Those that pushed for hate crime to be extended to trans people are the same that claim misgendering is a hate crime. I've seen them, it's what they scream at every protests.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 02:58 AM
1

of course you won't get much on a fine for books. But when it's a judge giving you a fine to pay, things are more serious. And while i agree that it's a bit of a detour to be jailed for such a fine, would you really pay a fine on something that should never be a thing in your mind? Say you said out loud that you like milk and someone decided it was a hate symbol (4chan actually did this one and many people thought it was serious) and you are fined some thousands of dollars for offending people w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/18 05:12 PM
1

in both example, the answer seem to indicate many people. As if more than 1 person was sitting on the chair and they all went to the bathroom. In the 2nd example, it reads like the person asking thinks the landscaper is alone, but the answering person knows it is a team of landscaper. It really reads as if the second person is correcting the 1st person on the amount of people he must prepare to see. "it" is insulting because it's dehumanizing. It's dehumanizing because it is associated to object…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/18 05:04 PM
1

not paying a fine is a criminal offense
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 10:26 PM
1

not when talking about a specified person. But there is a pronoun that is 100% singular and is about a specified thing; it. But when you hear "it". Like when you talk about a cat and the sex doesn't matter, you might say "it is a good cat" or "it zoomes across the house at 1am". "It" is the singular non-gendered pronoun.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 10:06 PM
1

why would anyone pay any fine if there was no consequences? And by prefered pronouns, they were talking about just those types of pronouns And this is what Peterson was talking about too. He said clear as day that he had no qualms about using he or she on anyone wanting it. It's the 100 others like skle zir and the likes he objects to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 12:51 AM
3

i think you could get different responses from people reading the same words by telling the reader that the author is either a man or woman. People will read intent between the lines that isn't there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 12:48 AM
1

women who plan don't get in the orange jumpsuit because they either don't get caught or they didn't do the murder themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 12:47 AM
1

there are violent criminal women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 12:46 AM
1

all i can think of when i hear "they" is "where are the other people?" because in current English, they is plural.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 12:45 AM
1

and they are more prone to ask another man to do her crime for her. Like asking for the assassination of her spouse rather than doing it herself. Or to poison him in order not to get caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:52 AM
1

more likely attracted to the potential for protection. The strongest guy to protect you is also strong enough to hurt you though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:51 AM
1

women are as prone to violence as men, they just don't hit as hard. Most violence in couples is reciprocal and there is more violent abuse in the lesbian community than in the gay community, but it should be reversed for your statement to be true. my guess is that we (or life itself) don't teach women to reign in their violent tendencies since we tend to see it as non-threatening, as opposed to men's violence which we recognize as potentially harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:49 AM
2

but why do they come across as angry or sad depending on their sex when they express similar things in similar fashion? It seems like a form of sexism to interpret it inherently differently on the basis of their sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:36 AM
1

i also will not use xim, glim, vler xer xhim or whatever other pronouns that were created within the last few years by people that want to feel special. If you were born male and want to be identified as female (or vice versa) and do the bare minimum to show it, i will respect that and address you appropriately (as Peterson would too). But no, i do not agree that you are queer bi-fluid-gender of third spirited ethereal wolfkin. And i will not use the made-up pronoun that was created to go along …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:31 AM
1

you can be sent to jail fot not paying the fine for not using "skle" and "xgler" as pronouns for someone that demanded them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:22 AM
1

because death is totally a benefit...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 01:26 PM
1

i would say the fact that there are almost no shelters for men as opposed to thousands for woman plays into depressions that lead to suicide among men. Having your kids taken away from you with no hope to get them back because the system is built to be pro mothers is another thing. Men doing every dangerous jobs that has a chance of giving you PTSD plays into that too. Society was build so that men could lay their lives for the safety of women. Women historically didn't get as many freedoms beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 09:36 PM
1

if everything was by and for men, why is it so unbearable to men that they commit so much more of the suicides? Why are we even allowing women on our internet? Why letting them speak? Or perhaps you are simply wrong about that statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 04:30 PM
1

society as a whole don't seem to care, but a very vocal subset does and they are powerfully driven to gain the power to do something about perceived oppression. And they are very influential with the lawmakers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 01:11 PM
1

it is the MGTOW philosophy though
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 07:28 PM
1

do not assume that the moment he lashes out was from the first rejection. It may be from a life long series of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 04:11 AM
3

do not think that because a man works a whole lot means he likes his job more than his wife. It may be that some men show their affection by wanting to provide for their partner and working overtime for example is a way to do that. A lot of men have this "provider of food" instinct. These higher workload help climb corporate ladders as an added bonus. Also, aiming for a higher paying position goes into this narrative of upgrading the living of the rest of his family. Also, having a wife that ear…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 03:03 AM
1

seems a lot of people on all sides use the fact that they think they fight for the right side to justify atrocious acts. Like BLM members beating up Trump voters, feminist activists destroying a man's life on rape hearsay, MRA ondividuals encouraging hitting a woman, or antiFa destroying everything in their illegal protest's path.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 02:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter