TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aRVAthrowaway Archive

View 1 post and 32 comments by aRVAthrowaway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That’s a voluntary Acknowledgement of Paternity (AOP), not a birth certificate and you’re by no means required to sign it, and the mother is by no means obligated to fill in a fathers name on the birth record.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 03:31 AM
1

Fathers don’t sign birth certificates, FYI.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:19 AM
1

Because he served in that capacity (a father to the child) for a significant period of time. Once born, the courts tend to side with a child’s best interests, which means both parents (biological or not) have a financial responsibility to the child. Again, you can’t really believe that someone can just pick any man and they’ll immediately just owe child support, right? That’s rediculous
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:17 AM
1

That is how consent works. No. It isn't. Maybe look up the definition of consent? Consent is permission for something to happen. For something to happen, it can't have already happened. You can't consent after the fact. If no permission was given before the act, then the object of the action didn't give consent. Cut and dry, plain and simple. Full stop. From everything from sex to medical procedures, that is how consent works.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:56 PM
1

Pretty sure that wasn't the only factor if you lost your car. Previous offenses, likely.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:50 PM
5

While I get your point, the age of consent in Britain is 16 so it's legally incorrect to call it "rape", for this case or even it was reversed.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 08:04 PM
1

Reddiquette literally says downvotes are specifically not for simply disagreeing with a comment. Downvotes are for comments that contribute nothing to the conversation, as yours did. Because it made no sense.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:28 PM
14

Generally, what you said was both needlessly politicizing the issue and, on top of that, made no fucking sense.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 05:48 AM
37

What did I just read?
/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:47 AM
0

Won’t make ya feel worse either.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:30 AM
2

You sure about that? I'd say it's not illegal unless you can cite a law that makes it so. It may be a lawsuit waiting to happen, but that doesn't mean it's illegal. That's not what illegal means.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:11 AM
21

And this is why a perpetual culture of victimization, which is what many who call themselves feminists and attended this march utilize, is a shit thing to perpetuate. It ends up with psychopaths like her somehow obtaining a platform to speak.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:48 PM
2

70%? Haha. Try a 130% increase. It earned $678,425,855.63 in 2016 dollars.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 02:47 PM
2

Well, technically, in 1984 dollars, it would be $678,425,855.63. So that's really 33%.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 02:46 PM
1

Well, that's not entirely technically correct whatsoever. Technically all states except Montana are "at-will" BUT a vast majority of those 49 states require companies to include in their employment contract that an employee can only be terminated for a just cause.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 05:35 PM
1

Because hair color isn't a protected class.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 05:30 PM
11

...yet the #1 video right now is a girl making a joke about changing a tire through thinly-veiled feminism.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 07:35 PM
-1

"Didn't mean to" isn't a valid excuse here. If you didn't or even if you did mean to, it still created a hostile environment.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 04:47 AM
23

Since when are people of color considered LGBT?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 01:35 AM
3

I think what /u/Ipleadbeethovens5th means is that even if it's a manufactured reaction, the audience still has to choose to go along with it to produce that manufactured reaction.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:42 PM
1

Um no it's not
/r/MensRights18/01/16 06:39 AM
29

Just an FYI, this isn't necessarily Apple's fault. They pull they Dictionary data from the New Oxford American Dictionary. Edit: you can contact Oxford Dictionaries here to request they change the definition here. Edit 2: We did it...sort of! Edit 3: Apparently not. When browsing in private mode, the definition returns. Odd.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:21 AM
15

Think about it and contemplating it are two very different things How so? Contemplate literally means "to think about".
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:33 PM
3

Son of a bitch
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:57 PM
2

I dunno about Columbia but at the university I graduated from fi you didn't comply with graduation day procedures, you didn't receive your diploma on graduation day...you get a blank one.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:29 AM
-2

That's not at all in the least what you're ranting on about above. And the institution that is marriage is a great thing as well, and by no means a failure. It provides a number of legal and instituional benefits and protections that I and we wouldn't otherwise have if single. Again, so sorry you haven't been able to find someone you trust and respect enough to share in that institution and not murder, resent, or abuse you.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:02 AM
1

"Complete" means whole, entire, full total. So unless every single marriage is a total, whole, entire failure, your comment on marriage being a complete failure is an extremely vast over-exaggeration. If, by 2040, 60% don't end like /u/KalianVirii is saying, then that's by no means a complete failure. Whatsmore, your bullshit grade-school grading system doesn't apply in this situation. Sorry you haven't found a partner worth spending the rest of your life with but I and many others have and like…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 09:36 PM
1

How dare newspapers report factual information! But seriously, what does it matter that it was in the same newspaper?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:02 AM
9

I think equal treatment is the way to go. So, a battery for a battery? Because legally, whether throwing liquid in someone's face or sweeping someone's leg, it's all battery.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/14 07:00 AM
0

As a child of a divorced parents, I can see why someone would oppose this law from the viewpoint of thinking of children first and, for that reason, I would likely oppose this measure, too. Doing a straight 50/50 split is particularly rough on kids and overly burdensome on the parents. With that said, what I find particularly atrocious is that some people are using this as a faux-viewpoint to promote feminist POVs. So, on face value...the law and the idea behind it just sucks...no matter what th…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 09:35 PM
16

Came here to submit this. Happy to see it happening. Not happy about the title on /r/funny. OP (on that post) is a bundle of sticks.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:12 PM
0

She doesn't have to identify as one. She does identify herself as a feminist on her Twitter. As for the radical part, well...anyone that buys into the rape culture hysteria I label as a radical. Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter