TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aVeryLonePepe Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by aVeryLonePepe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That was the BIGI. I think searching this should find the posts.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:10 AM
2

So will there be any action?
/r/MensRights19/03/19 03:49 PM
2

Sorry, after browsing memes for 1 year I am not used to reading titles.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:33 PM
1

Racist? Sexist? What?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:51 AM
2

I agree with her. Letting someone control Someones body against their free will is a) Fucked up and b) Straight out of Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:45 AM
1

Pardon my french, but "Homme" means human, not man IIRC.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:43 AM
2

Oh we can already see the results in Europe... Do you mean Greece and Spain?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:37 AM
1

cannot live on their own without someone to take care of them If you are reffering to my past comment, I meant biologically unfit and unable. Fetuses younger than 18 weeks (19 is the record) are biologically unable to live outside the womb or something equivalent no matter what. Normal babies can survive biologically, but will die later due to lack of care, not due to biology.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:45 PM
1

Care to explain?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:42 PM
1

Why is it not okay? You think it's okay for women to combat their own lack of choice by denying men's choice. Why is it not okay? You think it's okay for men to combat their own lack of choice by denying women's choice. But yes, a person who advocates father's being able to stop mother's from killing their unborn children would be characterized that way. But yes, a person who advocates for mothers being able to stop fathers from forcing them to do something against their will would be characteri…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:51 PM
1

that's not what "alive" means and you know it none of those things are required for something to be "alive" I just said that it is not an exact definition. You remind me of C Compilers. Crying foul for everything needing everything perfectly defined. The only thing that is unique to you, and to many on this sub, is the inability to understand context and only caring about being right, not about useful discussion. Why not just admit the fetus is alive and it's being killed by abortion? Because it…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:45 PM
0

If you truly want to cherrypick, alive isnt the right word for it, but when I say something I assume basic sense of context.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:12 PM
1

No, it is not. It cannot survive outside the womb (Assuming 18 weeks and not having evolutional strategies similar to parasites), it is incapable of traditional thinking as we know it (Basic animal behaviours count) and it is incapable of feeding itself. If you really want to cherrypick, alive isnt the right word for it, but when I say something I assume basic comprehension and context (the question of abortion).
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:11 PM
1

Why would you try to characterize this as being "anti-choice" when both sides are necessarily anti and pro-choice on the issue? You are anti-male choice and pro-female choice. I am talking about choice in the abortion sense, you know, pro life and that stuff. Women having the choice necessarily removes men's choice. Men having the choice necessarily removes women's choice. Why is it okay for women to combat their lack of choice by denying men their choice? Why is it okay for men to combat their …
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:04 PM
1

That is trying to deny a choice from a woman. You dont combat your lack of choice by preventing others from choosing.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:09 PM
1

Abortion is not murder. The fetus is not alive.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:06 PM
1

What does this have to do with femininity? This is just idiotic, childish behaviour. Theres nothing female about this.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:16 PM
4

So are we anti-choice now?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:08 PM
3

I was reffering to the "Patriarchy" part.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:36 PM
2

Ehm, how is this her fault? And why is this here?
/r/MensRights24/02/19 01:56 PM
51

Atleast replace the "Women" label with "Feminists". The majority of women are inteligent, decent people.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 01:45 PM
2

Extreme rare circumstances, testing int the same lab again can negate this? Yes, rare circumstances which happened here. And IIRC He said they took test from different companies (Not sure here), which means different Labs. And even then, man-made errors in the lab can always occur (a hair getting into the tube etc.). They occur rarely, thats why the other tests came back negative.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 08:15 PM
1

Nope. https://www.l2law.com/blog/2017/03/4-ways-paternity-test-results-can-be-wrong.shtml
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:04 PM
2

They know about this group and call everyone here a misogynistic white middle aged man (Exaggarating). If they had the ability to do something they would have done it a long time ago.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:20 PM
1

That survey is absolute bullshit. I dont know, but whistling isnt Sexual harrassment. Neither is stalking or making threats to harm you.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:30 PM
0

How did the initial DNA test fail? How can DNA test be different for paternity? I personally dont know the technicalities, but I know that they can fail. There is a 2% chance IIRC. https://www.l2law.com/blog/2017/03/4-ways-paternity-test-results-can-be-wrong.shtml Which idiots have downvoted me?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:24 PM
1

Dont post this stuff here, please. We all know r/Feminism is a borderline man hating shithole with scents of racism. No need to go there to affirm it every day.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:18 PM
8

Sorry, but I dont believe that this is real.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:23 PM
1

I dont think I understand what you mean. Please explain.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 08:56 PM
2

No. It is not. It simply showcases the popular use of the word, whether the use is right or wrong, it is a use.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:44 PM
1

You put quote marks around it, which means you used the exact same words as the definition. Whatever. That's not the way people here use it, surely you mean some people use it like that. I am talking about the general public, noone here would use it due to the information we have. You have not provided even one bit of evidence to back your assertion, you've made no attempt to prove it whatsoever. Do I need to post the dictionary definition of evidence? Would that help? Point is, people use it li…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:31 PM
1

Edit: I don’t really think it’s a big deal either. But could you imagine the out lash if they locked the LGBT characters in such a way? I personally dont think there would be any. I have yet to play AL, but I assume that noone will actually read the Bios.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:28 PM
0

So let me try this differently. I wont make any comments anymore because you will disregard anything I say. Simply go out and ask people if people use those 2 words synonymously. A good example is a "sexist" joke. People will always automatically assume that it is misogynistic, because sexism against men is a relatively new concept awareness-wise.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:15 PM
1

only white guy who has the name of “caustic - toxic trapper” Toxic trappers are cool. I really think that you are jumping at random straws here.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:05 PM
-6

You did not provide a source for your "facts.". I conclude that means you don't have a source. Verdict: your facts are merely your opinions. There is no room to argue when a statement uses sexist language. When most if not all dictionaries put sexism as a common word for misogyny, it is Safe to assume that it is not feminist dogma. And common uses are not sexist. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:04 PM
3

It does not say "Based on sex", did you read it? The "on the basis of sex". It is functionally the same. And the word male is not mentioned once, the word women mentioned twice... prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex sexism in language is an offensive reminder of the way the culture sees women Because people actually use it like that? Whether right or wrong, it is used like that by the majority of people. By feminist definitions it's not even p…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:59 PM
-6

This is not about believing women. This is about the fact that most people use "sexist" as a synonym to "misogynist". Whether its right or wrong, it is like that.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:53 PM
1

What is wrong with that? Who cares? Let the devs do what they want.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:14 PM
1

Is this a joke or serious?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:13 PM
-8

No, it does not include discrimination against men. It does. It says "Based on sex", and "male" is a sex. That is the feminist dogma. It isnt. People usually use it as a synonym to misogyny. It is a a fact and it should be there that it is typically used to describe misogyny. You are getting dangerously close to the pit of "Lets remove facts because of Political correctness".
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:09 PM
1

And what does this have to do with MR?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:05 PM
3

Which (debatably) means that they have a mental illness, not hysteria. And how is that even science? Its just feelings.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 08:09 PM
1

Why so?
/r/MensRights08/02/19 10:06 AM
3

Unpopular Opinion has always been like that. Look at the top posts.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 09:58 AM
1

You might want to check out r/raisedbynarcissists It is more of a general parental abuse sub than a Narc. abuse sub, so it should help you in some way. But to your question, they want you to apologize so she will stop being a bitch. She was probably complaining about you the whole dinner and they have enough of it. Other than that, this does not seem like a Feminist issue to me. I think it more resembles your average DV.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:42 AM
2

I think you are seriously overestimating the impact of SJWs. They are not as omnipresent or prevalent as Reddit might lead you to believe, therefore they are not as "dangerous" as Reddit would like you to believe. But to the question, Western and North Europe except Sweden. People call it a Feminist SJW haven. I dont know if this is true but you should know of the rumors.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:39 AM
1

White privilege was never a thing. I disagree. Just look back to the period of 1776-1865(?).
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:35 AM
4

What does this have to do with MR?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 11:55 PM
9

This is bullshit. Stupid bullshit. This numbers look like this because of the bureauceatic system the Swedes use. All Sexual assault and harassment are grouped under one term (Sexualverdakt or something like that), and this term is used within statistics. All these "rape Capital" and similar are due to the bureacratic system. The "Feminism" they use is actually quite fair. This is nothing but label shaming without looking at actual Events and policies. Due to social liberation it is Relatively e…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:41 PM
1

We reject the ahistoricism that lauds the Suffragettes for gaining votes for women, but ignores that they were part of the larger suffragist movement aimed at gaining the vote for ALL citizens (in the UK, at least). Could you provide sources? I am interested.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:06 PM
1

I dont care if someone is Left, Right or a Gendervoid Foxkin Demiqueer. Nearly everyone is better than Trump.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:57 PM
1

So Trump isnt pro-men's right by any stretch but dont just say no and not give a counter example. Of the candidates who do you think is the most pro-men's rights or at least not anti men? before you answer consider Trump's administration rolled back the kangaroo courts in colleges that Obama put in (and Hillary would have kept) I SERIOUSLY doubt any democratic candidate wont just put them right back in the first day in office. So where does that leave us? Hate Trump all day long but the son of a…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:35 PM
2

However, actual feminists who try to discuss feminism in here get banned too. /r/feminism is a support circlejerk group and nothing else. No?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:43 PM
1

No. Just... No.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:40 PM
1

What the hell does this have to do on MR and why the hell does it come from TD?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:36 PM
1

Balanced, as all things should be.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:20 PM
1

I dont have duckduckgo, how different is it?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:28 PM
7

Why hello there, bratře! But serious question, how would they find out that you are a man and prosecute you afterward s?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:37 PM
9

For what possible gain would anyone get from accusing him? Not being appointed as a judge.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:35 PM
1

Notice the Large use of [Citation Needed] and the amount of fabricated Claims with no proof. And I wont even start talking about their opinion pieces that they classify as truth.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:34 PM
2

What is ICA?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:09 PM
-3

In theory? An interesting philosophy. In r/MGTOW ? Misogyny, gatekeeping and more (Quick peek).
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:26 PM
1

Yes. He won by a small margin, which could be accounted for by men's rights activists, especially since his opponent was running on a vote for the vagina ticket. Are you saying that Trump is better than Hillary? They both suck, but Hillary is the lesser Evil.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 01:28 PM
2

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:38 AM
1

BTW, read the rules first. IDK if recruiting is allowed but asking about the best programming language and ways to do it should be good.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:19 PM
7

I am just a random 14 year old that has a programming fetish and sees a potential opportunity to use my skills. Such web based things would require the Django library, which is similar to Ruby on rails. I have no experience with back-end programming, nor doing it in a language that was not meant for it. PHP, JavaScript and their respective back-end frameworks are your best bet. Go to stackoverflow.com and ask about it, they ll help you.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:16 PM
7

Including: PHP/Python/json/Java/etc. What kind of libraries and purposes? Django Python?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:56 PM
1

Updated the post.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:37 PM
1

The wage gap: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/bolotnyy/files/be_gendergap.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjn4tLi-K7fAhWS6aQKHX1kBO8QFjAAegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3HpK7q5iEKA2A-sZ7yU07J Explains its existence and why it isnt tied to sexism. Rape: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/ Violence: Idk if this is the one with DV, I have a lot of them. If not tell me, am on mobile. www.victimsweek.gc.ca/res/r512.html https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:34 PM
2

Could you link your studies?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:40 AM
3

Word for word repost from r/unpopularopinion
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:35 AM
1

What does this have to do with modern life and "the Boys"?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 06:12 PM
1

r/Feminism
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:49 PM
3

No, it is meant as a designation for you. An Incel is a person that solemnly believes that women go attractive men while disregarding personality. Usually in the pursuit of a better sex life or money. I dont know if you are an involuntary celibate physically, but you spread their stupid, hateful ideas, which barely make sense. You know, women arent the devils creation.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:27 PM
4

Why does this sound like the Incel manifesto?
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:19 PM
4

How do men earn it?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 10:23 AM
3

r/amitheasshole
/r/MensRights17/11/18 09:28 PM
1

Agreed. This isnt equality, this is suppresion.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 09:17 PM
1

*27+63=/=100 Source?
/r/MensRights17/11/18 09:16 PM
1

Do you have any photos/screenshots that support your Claim?
/r/MensRights17/11/18 09:14 PM
1

What? Isnt this illegal? And what does it have to do with MRAs?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:41 PM
2

Would you mind linking the study?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:49 AM
1

Would you mind to point out the holes? I am a Leftist Misandrist Libtard that is blinded by Feminism, so I cant see them.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:35 PM
0

I agree. OP is a hypocrite, thank god people see this and Downvote his/her comments. OP, Feel free to call me a Left Libtard SJW.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:34 PM
0

Where did the people point out its fake? What evidence do they have? I am genuinly curious.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:51 AM
36

r/Feminism just got r/murderedbywords
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:08 PM
1

Then show them. To have a valid argument you would need tens of thousands of articles/comments. Or alternatively, a survey or study that shows this kind of behaviour.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:48 PM
1

Again, the people you mention are the radical ones. Most arent like that.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:33 PM
1

These are points I can get behind. But do note that most Feminists dont demonize Mens sexuality. Other than that none of this points to them being a hate group except the sexuality part.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:08 PM
1

You make good points. I agree with this comment.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:42 PM
2

So the sane, normal, Feminists should own up to the faults of the hypocrites (Namely r/Feminism)? Dont get me wrong, this is what I understand from your comment. I am not apologizing the insane behaviour RadFems have, I just think that the whole movement should not be judged based on the Fanatics in the same sense we shouldnt be judged based on the actions of Incels. I fully agree with your point on insane Feminists, but I respectfully disagree when it comes to sane people.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:34 PM
2

You are taking it too far. Reddit-ish Feminism (Talking about their boards specifically) is cancer, but I wouldnt condemn the whole movement for the actions of a few idiots. If you would like to see sane Feminists, go to r/FeMRAdebates , the sub is open minded and wont ban you for criticizing anything.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:14 PM
2

What has this to do with Mens Rights? Is there a mention of her doing that because she hates men? Or did she do this to protest men? If not, then I dont see a reason this should be here.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:12 PM
6

The problem is, that attempts cannot be gauged Correctly. There are traumatised people that wont tell anyone that they tried it. Car accidents are labeled as crashes, but could in fact be suicides. Attempts are uncountable. Everything could be suicide.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 01:48 PM
1

http://www.realsexism.com/ A great source for studies and information regarding Mens issues.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 11:41 AM
4

Men commit suicide a LOT more, BRB with the source. Here it is : https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/9qjgac/suicide_rates_among_persons_aged_15_years_and/?utm_source=reddit-android
/r/MensRights24/10/18 11:32 AM
1

Really? It is more than that, definitely. We got the V4, The Scandinavians, Austria, I am sure of those. Then we got the baltic, not many are EU members, but Croatia and Romania count (Not sure on Romania). Now we got 11 that I am sure of. Then we got Germany and Greece, so 13. Then ive heard of some programs in the UK which are free, so 14. Then we got Estonia, 15. Then we got France, Scotland (We could exclude those) and Malta, 18. 18/28, only counting tuition which is 100% free. Not counting …
/r/MensRights17/10/18 08:23 PM
4

People demand free money for Academia and Healthcare due to it being a standard in Europe, (Nearly?) all countries in the EU have free universities and cheap healthcare. It is a standard in Europe, thats why people demand money. Edit: Its actually 17(18)/28, but the point still stand because Hungary is part of the V4, and all of them have free tuition so the people view it as a right of everyone around them has it.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 12:10 PM
2

The story is fake and the OP is a liar. Go through the comments.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:18 PM
3

I dont know what the title meant to imply, but the story is fake and the OP of that post is a pathological liar.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:16 PM
1

Look at the comments. Pure comedy gold.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:20 PM
1

Yes. Because the results would be the same.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:08 PM
8

They do, by a large margin.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:04 PM
4

*by an extremely large margin
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:03 PM
1

Actually, the main reason of it being scrapped is not the fact that it was "sexist". It literally gave random results, it did not look at qualifications, it looked at buzzwords like "Executed" and the like.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:01 PM
14

This made me smile.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:56 PM
11

I call horse shit. Fatherless children fill prisons and are more violent than motherless children. https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:52 PM
1

I agree with this comment, but she did no wrong in that post. She did not name anyone, did not post any personal information nor did she intend to hurt anyone. She was asking, which Is not criminal. I agree that the account should be banned, seeing as the issue was resolved. Give her a 30 day suspension from reddit to get her shit right (Talking with Psychologists, treating and extreminating the bugs).
/r/MensRights11/10/18 10:19 AM
1

I am afraid I do not understand your point, so I might answer to something you didnt mean to represent. She did not break any law to my knowledge, she just asked. Neither was she arrested and claimed that she did not know about the hypothetical law. In my country at the very least (Central Europe), you cannot be jailed if you have done something under the effects of something that you cannot control (Schizophrenia, for example. Alcohol doesnt fit this because you can control the intake). You wil…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:36 AM
1

https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/ https://www.theguardian.com/society/2001/apr/05/crime.penal I am not sure of the credibility of The Guardian, but TFG seems credible.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:29 AM
1

In what way? I would like to know your opinion. I dont know if it wasnt clear from my text, but my main point was that she could have done much worse, and this was one of the best outcomes of this situation.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:12 PM
1

In what way was she being ignorant? She was not interested in the subject of bed bugs, nor drugs, so she asked, which was the better outcome, she could have outright accused him. You are giving her so much for asking first and not doing something wrong. The psychic effects bed bugs do excuse her paranoia, so she could be considered out of her mind when she wrote the article. What I understood from the thread was that she saw the bed bugs, and to the extent of my understanding, understood that th…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:51 PM
-1

Are you giving her shit because of this? She never named him nor did she File a Claim against him. She was unsure and did not know about any kind of drugs, and her BF being a doctor was just a coincidence. She did not harm/accuse anyone, there is no reason she is in any way bad. She was just unsure as she lacked the knowledge in the field.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 06:22 PM
5

The whole sub altogether is cancer. Ban happy mods that will ban everyone that disagrees with Feminism, Feminists insulting non Feminists, half truths when it comes to studies etc. Dont even bother going there, it isnt even an Echo chamber, it is a Hive Mind.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 06:17 PM
8

Just saying that children that grow up without fathers have a higher chance of being criminals and abusers than if they wouldnt have a mother. And fatherless children commit 63% of suicides.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 06:06 PM
19

This was posted on r/Feminism with the caption "Interesting how MRA subreddits are silent about this". Thats some r/quityourbullshit material.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 06:25 PM
1

Before I say anything, Id like to mention that I am not American, so take everything with a grain of salt and Correct me if I am wrong somewhere. If he would leave, then Ford will win, and the people that believe her lies will attribute all of it on him feeling guilty that he raped her. And seeing all the support Ford gets from the American left (What I have heard) it really looks like a Left-sponsored plot (My own opinion). If he would leave, the bad guys (girls?) will win, and that would be ba…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 02:41 PM
1

Really I'd have to go back to 2010 when we found out more men are raped than women in the USA for a more shocking statistic. Source?
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:58 AM
1

Do you have a link for the 40% study?
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:57 AM
1

How so? I don't understand your view point.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:59 PM
1

"Being banned from r/Feminism is like being banned from the paralympics because you arent handicapped enough." - a redditor on another sub I got banned for adding context to an image. They were posting about how we agree with TRP, so I cleared it up by saying that were mostly outraged by the "Correct masculinity" message and not the banning itself. Got perma banned within 3 hours for misogyny. It is just a harmless Hive mind.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:18 PM
2

Thank you. I did not understand your first comment.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:32 PM
2

What is the reasoning behind this statement? When it comes to the reddit sub at least, they ban everything that doesnt fit their narrative (I have proof).
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter