TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

abigailmermaid Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by abigailmermaid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 11:45 PM
40

25 female here. You’re 100% correct. Don’t entertain any women that have a feminist worldview.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 04:16 AM
1

They said cows are more sentient than human babies and that if you’re against baby murder, you must also be a vegetarian. That clearly implies that eating human babies is better than eating cows. You keep getting hung up on the word “advocating,” even though I used it once and then I dropped it in all my other responses and responded to the argument at hand. Instead of engaging with the argument, you fixate on semantics. It’s cowardly to deliberately hide behind pedantry when the underlying impl…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:17 AM
1

No, they asked if I was vegetarian in response to me being against human baby murder and explicitly claimed that cows are more sentient than human babies. I didn’t put those words in their mouth. That directly infers that animals killed for meat are more sentient than human babies. Their claim, that eating animals is wrong on a morally equivalent basis to baby murder, coupled with the assertion that cows are more sentient than babies, logically entails that fetal murder and cannibalism would be …
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:23 AM
1

You either don’t understand how moral equivalence works or haven’t read the comments properly. They claimed that cows are more sentient than human babies, (which infers cows are of greater moral value to human babies based on sentience) and that if I’m against murdering babies, surely I must be against eating animal meat (which infers cows are at least of equal moral value to human babies in terms of consuming them for food). It is a direct moral inference from those two statements that they mus…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:44 AM
1

How is it a strawman?
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:45 AM
1

I don’t approve either, however, they are different methods with different functions and purposes, so you need to provide evidence that they’re the same when you demand I agree with your view. Why is a baby born of rape worth less than any other baby, and why should the baby be punished by death for its father’s crime? Since when does rape justify baby murder? Where is your moral fibre? What religious belief involves a 40 day special murder right for your unborn baby? Aren’t you lucky that you m…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 10:14 PM
1

Promiscuity refers to having multiple sexual partners. Sexual partners means people you have sex with. Sex is reproductive.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 03:48 AM
1

Sex is reproductive.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 03:46 AM
2

Right and wrong doesn’t have exceptions. That’s how true morality works. You don’t get loopholes because something bad happened to you.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:50 PM
1

Yes, and we all already know that they can fail… Murdering your baby is always evil. Mind blowing how controversial not murdering your own baby is to women who behave like witches. “I had an IUD in.” And? Don’t kill your baby! What the f*** does an IUD have to do with the fact that murdering your baby is evil?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:47 PM
1

I completely agree that men are held to significantly higher standards than women, both under the law and in everyday life, while also being underprivileged by those same systems. That doesn’t change the facts.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:41 PM
0

You claimed our differences are overblown, that aside from biology, we’re mostly the same, with the same needs, emotions, problems, and deserving of “equal treatment” under law. That’s delusional. Your hypothesis directly contradicts your conclusion. Fundamental biological and physiological differences completely dismantle the idea of sameness. It’s physically impossible for two biologically opposite sexes to have the same needs, emotions, and problems.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:11 PM
1

Modern western societies are not “equal” at all, which is a terrible idea anyway, but instead they privelege women and “minorities”.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:01 PM
0

Men and women are entirely different in all of the categories you mentioned. We have completely different physiology for starters. Your statement is totally delusional.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:00 PM
3

Yes. And?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 11:44 AM
6

Yes and offering testimony that it is humanly possible for women to not be completely insane and morally bankrupt. Although rare today.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:55 AM
1

I agree that this is true in many cases, but you’re not addressing what I’ve actually said. The examples you’re providing are incongruent to my statements. I don’t spend any money at all, he handles all of his finances, and I don’t have access to his income. I accept the word “no”.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:53 AM
1

Providing doesn’t mean funnelling money to your wife. My husband provides for me, I do not spend his money.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:53 AM
4

No, marriage doesn’t mean you can only have sex to conceive. There are natural infertile periods every month and modern contraception, plenty of ways to manage fertility responsibly. However, none of this changes the reality that sex initiates the conception of human life. Whether you use contraceptives or not, sex is the deliberate initiation of pregnancy, and everyone knows that. Not wanting a baby or facing hardships doesn’t change the fabric of reality or morality, it’s just your selfish des…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:50 AM
1

You are claiming that it’s more moral to eat an unborn human baby than to eat a hamburger. You’re advocating for human fetal cannibalism.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:30 AM
1

Ah so when you blame God for pregnancy losses you admit it’s killing? Interesting.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:28 AM
1

So you think eating an unborn baby is equivalent to eating a hamburger?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:25 AM
1

This is a false dilemma. Choosing between saving embryos in a tube or a child is a hypothetical distraction. (Which makes you a coward) In the case of abortion, a mother isn’t saving anyone else, she’s ending the life of her own child. That’s not a rescue, it’s a deliberate premeditated killing.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:24 AM
1

Abortion isn’t scraping a few cells out, it’s scraping out a pregnancy. Maybe google what pregnancy is.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:20 AM
1

“Ultimately it’s a woman who needs to live with the consequences of pregnancy and childbirth” is a total contradiction to abortion. Abortion is not only refusing responsibility for your actions, but premeditatedly murdering the baby you initiated through sex.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:22 PM
2

Regardless of age, a human being is a human being. People who are unconscious are still people. And no, pregnancy is not a terminal illness, a medical emergency, or an inherent threat to life. Pregnancy is what continues life. It’s how you, I, and everyone else came to exist. You are the one advocating for ending life. Abortion is the threat to life. Pregnancy is how all human life begins. The woman’s life remains intact throughout the pregnancy. Your philosophy is completely ignorant of the fac…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:14 PM
1

Find a virtuous woman who is willing to be a good wife and mother in exchange for your provision and protection. It’s not wrong for women to desire security just as it’s not wrong for men to desire a loving submissive and fair wife.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:07 PM
3

The idea that the patriarchy was ever oppressive and that women had zero rights and were merely men’s property is a lie, from early feminist propaganda. It’s actually very easy to see this if you look at history plainly and without bias. There are countless examples throughout history of women in positions of leadership, royalty, wealth, and influence, women owning property, committing crimes, running amok, having fun, doing whatever they pleased regardless of status of wealth. Women doing whate…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:05 PM
3

All adults are clumps of cells too. That’s literally what a human being is, cells. Using developmental stages to argue that some humans are less human is ridiculous. It’s like saying, “a toddler and an old woman are at different stages of development, so one isn’t human.” That’s not how reality works. A human being is human, whether just conceived or taking their last breath. Get a grip.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:56 PM
1

Women can only be pregnant with human babies that have unique human DNA. Only whole human beings have unique human DNA. Development doesn’t involve changing species. We are humans from conception.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:51 PM
6

Sex being pleasurable doesn’t change the fact that it’s fundamentally reproductive. Contraception is preventative, but it can and does fail. You subscribe to a pro baby murder ideology. I genuinely hope you come to understand that you are more passionate about protecting women’s feelings of entitlement to consequence-free sex than about protecting the innocent lives initiated by sex. We were all conceived the same way. It’s unbelievably creepy that you believe you’re morally superior to babies, …
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:49 PM
19

25 year old female here. This is all 100% correct. Women today are being poisoned by feminism. They’re obsessed with other people’s obligations to them, most of which are either bizarre, insanely entitled, or outright evil, and they are completely uninterested in, or ignorant of, their own responsibilities. They will talk about their “rights” until the end of time, but never once will they consider their duties, or whether they themselves are living virtuously. Do not date any woman who isn’t tr…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:45 PM
2

You’ve cited extremely rare, highly specific cases, typically involving much older women with serious health complications, and then disingenuously applied them to all women and pregnancies. That’s intellectually dishonest and morally cowardly. If you believe the killing of unborn children is justifiable, then make that case honestly. Don’t hide behind rare exceptions that still don’t justify taking innocent life.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:25 PM
5

If you’re “not ready for pregnancy,” then don’t have sex. Sex is not a necessity. You don’t get to kill your unborn children just because you’re not ready to take responsibility for your own sexual actions. Waiting until you’re “ready” doesn’t justify ending a life you deliberately and knowingly initiated.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:19 PM
2

Murdering your own child in a desperate situation, doesn’t make it moral, rational, or any less than what it is, murder. Even if someone were facing starvation, killing their child would still be a selfish and evil act. And let’s be clear, in developed countries, where abortion is rampant, those seeking it are not facing that at all. Hardship does not justify murder anyway. Taking the life of the weak is not an act of courage or sensible in practicality, it is the most cowardly and expedient dec…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:13 PM
1

Using the word retard ❌ Murdering babies ✅
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:03 PM
7

A human being is a human being at every stage of development. Just as the elderly do not lose their humanity as they physically or mentally decline, neither do the youngest among us lose theirs as we trace their life back to conception. Development or regression doesn’t change what species we are.. To claim that an unborn human child is no more morally significant than bacon and eggs, let alone LESS morally significant, as you appear to be insisting, is evil. You are completely retarded in your …
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:37 AM
7

You’re morally equating eating a cheeseburger to murdering human babies? Vegans are insane.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:43 AM
10

You need someone to spell it out for you. Sex is reproductive.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 04:06 AM
6

How can a woman be promiscuous without possibility of pregnancy?
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:08 AM
10

Promiscuity means having sex with multiple sexual partners. You are literally agreeing with me.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 02:58 AM
12

Their promiscuity. Us women can never take responsibility for our own actions.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:25 AM
6

Yes, we’re referring to the same process every pregnant woman’s mother went through, while managing not to kill her. Hardship doesn’t justify killing your baby. And yes, poverty isn’t a valid excuse for murdering your babies either (wtf) , just as we don’t justify killing born children because their families are poor. I genuinely don’t understand how anyone can say these arguments out loud or write them. This is morally bankrupt and utterly insane.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:23 AM
11

When we have sex, pregnancy is a natural outcome of that choice. Abortion isn’t just avoiding responsibility, it’s murdering the baby we deliberately created. It is irrational that a baby’s moral worth depends on whether the mother wants it. If she does, miscarriage is a tragic loss; if she doesn’t, it’s dismissed as nothing. It’s horrific for a baby’s right to life to depend on the mother’s convenience. A child’s life shouldn’t hinge on how burdensome they are. We don’t allow toddlers to be kil…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 12:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter