TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

absoluteposition Archive

View 3 posts and 33 comments by absoluteposition on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
114

Activism/Supportabsoluteposition/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:27 PM
27

Feminismabsoluteposition/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:18 PM
11

Social Issuesabsoluteposition/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:40 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Man she is going to get some serious probation!
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:57 AM
10

To the one person talking about mod policies - I would not think they would make a substantive difference. How on earth did you come to that conclusion? ML and the other feminist based subs are based around ideological conformance, with subs such as this one being based around free speech. Even if you do go through deleted posts it is largely meaningless as 99% of those posts would never have been made as the authors know they will be deleted, or have already been banned. The interesting social …
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:54 PM
19

It's also worth noting that she has two other battery convictions. It's hardly an isolated incident.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 12:45 PM
5

Comments Closed. Of course. Don't want any reality to get in the way of that cherry-picking.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:18 PM
11

Creepy is actually the male version of Slut. It's shaming someone for their sexuality. The difference is it's hard to find a woman who wants sex and cant get it, hence the difference.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:45 PM
3

Because it's viewed as something men do to women. At best you can argue that this terrible crime isn't done quite as much as people say it is, which is a horrendous argument to choose. Some important points: Men cannot be taken seriously victims. Men's value to society is in what they can provide. Presenting men as victims says that they are weak, and as a result undeserving of any sympathy. Sexist, yes. This is why it is best to display children as the victims. It's why nobody really gives a sh…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:51 PM
5

Go all in with education stats. Don't talk about rape, or DV, or any of that as those discussions require too much nuance. The great thing about the education discussion is that children are the victims. Look for biased teacher gradings, medication stats, changes in curriculum to cater for women's learning methods, right up to the enrollment gap in university and the fact that women have significantly more affirmative-action opportunities despite being a huge majority. If you are in the USA look…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:11 PM
28

Well firstly, how about I do a 30+ panel comic about how women are awful drivers? Unable to use power tools or work a computer? I thought generalization based upon gender was sexist? Secondly why on earth are these empowered women always getting with (according to them) lazy dirtbags and then extrapolating that out across all men? Want a man that does his fair share? Ask one out. Don't blame everyone else for your poor life choices.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:42 PM
4

I am mostly offended at how badly designed it is.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 01:10 AM
1

I make male blond jokes.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:02 PM
2

It would still work as a joke as 'he'
/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:28 AM
2

Or is the really disturbing thing that the boys cannot easily name a male role model?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:18 PM
2

The interesting question is why is partner count presented as entirely irrelevant in a 'how dare you care' context on the start of a relationship but once in a relationship adding to the number is a relationship ending act?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:39 PM
1

In defence of The Economist, they seem to be largely anti-SJW most of the time. I don't even really mind shitty virtue signalling hitjobs that much if the counter is presented by the same people occasionally. One writer and one article does not make a publication. It's a consistent tone and view that should be opposed. Not everyone is Salon...
/r/MensRights18/06/16 10:39 PM
6

The most amusing and kafkaesque thing of all is that the feminists have the power to block a men's group from campus because they don't believe in the patriarchy (the idea that men have power over women). These people are mental.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:01 PM
2

Education, education, education. It's the smoking gun. We should stop talking about rape all the time and just raise awareness of the issues in education. Universities are nearly 2/3rds female, but pretty much the only programmes in existence are 'women in STEM' ones. Looking even further at in-group female bias of teachers markings, the lack of men in the system as a result of 'paedophile scares' it's clear that the claims of 'patriarchy' are downright ludicrous. The entire feminist 'women are …
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:23 PM
2

All that the MRM is, at it's core, is the fight to get male issues taken seriously and addressed. That's it. As far as the 'women are obsolete' talk, it's quite clear to everyone that this is something feminists have been saying for a long time. The reaction of the MRM is just to point out that men designed, built, and keep running just about everything that you can consider as essential to society. Turnabout is fair play.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 07:48 AM
1

They didn't look very deeply into that knapsack of theirs did they? The main thrust behind 'neckbeard' is virgin shaming. Maybe just admitting that is too much for them?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:58 PM
-1

Cherry picking one random tumblrina's insane rantings and using that as an example of feminism is dishonest. Look at mwobuddy's comments in this thread. Would you feel pissed off if some random feminist forum took that as representative of the MRM? We should be better than that.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:09 AM
-4

I'd hardly say putting a ban on 'lets circlejerk over this rando insane feminist' posts is rabid censorship. Cultivating some level of contribution is standard fare. I can't post pictures of my dick here either, but I don't (and no doubt nobody else does either) see a problem with that.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:44 PM
2

You're mistaking risk assessment for absolute truth.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:40 PM
5

Yes. Yes it is. You cannot judge a non-opt-in group as a whole by certain members. Unless you think that being called a rapist for being male is cool too.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:32 PM
-2

I personally would like to see a ban on the 'look what this feminist said' posts. It's no different than the 'look at this MRA troll on twitter' bullshit. If the poster has no power and no influence then it shouldn't be here. You cannot judge an entire movement (even feminism) by a cherry-picked member. Political figure, NGO leader or Celebrity, fair enough, but Jane Bloggs with 45 twitter followers? No. If nothing else it's poor sport, and if you would consider it unrepresentative and underhand…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:31 PM
1

Just reminding people that Ghomeshi is (was) a staunch feminist before all this blew up. It'll be interesting to see where he ends up if he is not guilty.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:09 PM
8

There is only one argument you need. It kills babies. Sure it may be lottery ticket level risks, but it is a risk and the evidence of any gain is minor at best. Ask her if she'd buy a lottery ticket with the chance her child would die if she did it. Because that is effectively what she is doing.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:40 PM
1

The point is to convince everyone watching, not the person themselves. If you remove their ability to play victim then they just look crazy and spiteful.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:16 PM
0

Is it worth pointing out that he is wrong? And he should know, he runs the department that created the definition.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:36 PM
6

You can't have the best of both worlds" makes this sub look like a bunch of ignorant misogynists. I swear the word misogynist has been abused to the point of meaninglessness. If you spend time with your children when others are working you cannot expect to receive the same benefits and promotions as them. In many cases the people who are still there while parents are on maternity or working flexible hours due to children have to pick up the slack and do more work. If a woman can't have children …
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:36 PM
7

The societal and legal expectations expectations keeping men out of childcare are the issue, not the ones keeping women 'in' care. It's hard to take paternity leave when you have no rights to by law (while your wife does) and attempts to get part time work are denied by your company (while your wife is permitted) and you are presented by society as less capable. Alienating half of the populations by denying the existence their problems isn't helping anyone. Which is why we are against 'patriarch…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 01:30 PM
8

How about trying to change the legal and cultural prohibitions against men staying at home with their children? Paternity in general is pathetic and many companies are proven to discriminate against men who want part-time hours for childcare - yet are incredibly women friendly. The current direction, and especially considering WAM campaigning against shared parenting, is actually driving children away from their fathers. Men are seen as second class and often a danger to children by default. If …
/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:15 PM
1

Probably Laravel on PHP. I'll be doing most of the coding, and I don't know Ruby, so going that way would be unwise!
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:48 PM
5

I totally disagree. One of the main problems with the MRM is that elements are working very hard to make MRA, TRP and Misogynist synonymous in the mind of the public. Any effort to shine a light on this behaviour should be undertaken. At the moment a journalist can quote mine TRP, vaguely link it the MRM and the worst that will happen is that someone may say something in the comments (if they are even open).
/r/MensRights19/05/15 10:01 PM
12

So nobody has called me an idiot yet! A good sign! I have a cool domain name for this and, provided I get some more people, think I am going to go ahead with it! I don't want it to be associated with AVFM or any other site. If this was an AVFM effort it would be ok but doing so would ultimately link this to AVFM and put them under scrutiny, with the slightest thing they did wrong being help against our site. I cannot speak for them ethically. I have nothing against them in the slightest, though …
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter