TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

acearmv8 Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by acearmv8 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Your first mistake was arguing logically with feminists. Your second mistake was arguing logically with feminists.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 11:42 AM
2

The rules of some other federation is that if you are transitioning from male to female, you can not compete until you have been under certain hormonal levels for two years.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:06 AM
2

She was born a girl and wants to be a boy.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:05 AM
1

I think the real problem is the rule that does not allow him to compete against the boys. He has asked to compete against the boys and not against the girls, but he has been denied.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 11:15 PM
3

That's not the point. Regardless of anyone's opinion, there was medical justification by a doctor and according to the rules that makes it valid. The situation is fucked up, I agree, but everything was done according to the rules.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:27 PM
-5

The trick is he had medical permission to use steroids and the rules of the championship say that if its for medical reasons it does not count as doping.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 09:07 PM
17

Once you are in the system there is no out. Its almost out of the worse Russian communist stories, but in the USA college campuses.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 09:05 PM
8

Well, she does not blame it on men, but blames it on "toxic masculinity". Tomatos, tomatoes. This is just feminism trying to take back the initiative and actually pretending to care about men by shoe horning feminist theory. They will tell these men in a vulnerable position to be more open and share their feelings. When that does not work and men keep killing themselves they will double down in claiming that if men acted like women everything would be better. They will never admit the mental dif…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:19 PM
10

This is what will happen, Milo will be fucked, nothing will happen to Maher. The democratic left forgives, even condones, these things, specially in what it percives as lefty alphas. The right does not. Think of Roman Polanski. He fucked a minor, she even claim it was full on rape at some point, and despite the victim being a girl, a part of the left even defended him. And let's not forget that Milo was the kid in the experience he confessed, yet he is being punished. It was a very well executed…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:47 AM
1

You must be a horrible human being if those are your natural instincts.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 08:56 AM
1

Assuming that, with our extremely limited cognitive capacity compared to the apparent infinite amount of variables in the universe, we can design something better than what millions of years of trial and error have produced has to be the epitome of ego. Humble a bit. Even if certain characteristics of the human being are not needed now they might in the future.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:35 PM
0

And yet, not treating him like the abuser is the normal and decent thing to do.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:41 AM
0

Do not be silly. Humans do not rise above our biological instincts, that's very naive. We are animals with certain characteristics and that is how we react. Do not let your ego think that you are a logical machine that have overcome your natural instincts because that's silly. Not that it would even be a positive thing.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:40 AM
2

I do not think the MRM is utopian. I think there is a new crop of people joining that try to ignore biology that are not only utopian but damaging to the movement, because they make the MRM so out of touch of reality as feminism. That humans have some biological inclinations does not mean everything is written in stone, but at the same time we have to aspire to something real, not some impossible sense of equality that might not even be desirable. Evolution has specialized each sex somehow and w…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:37 AM
1

Still, its the decent thing to do to show comprehension for his situation and not treat him like an abuser just because you disagree with his political ideology.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:32 AM
1

I never a scribe it all to biology, but believing one can or even should change things that have a strong biological base is the wrong way, that is my point.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:29 AM
1

You are making my point. Changing what people consider "their tribe" is doable. Changing sexual behaviour not so much.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:28 AM
10

The movement is being gamed. Its not just random trolling, its political actors trying to stir shit.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:12 AM
7

There is a difference between having a sexual preference for blue eyes to thinking people with brown eyes are inferior.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 11:03 PM
0

You can disagree with him, but insinuating he likes babies when he has been a victim is extremely disrespectful and out of line.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:43 PM
4

Not necessarily. Changing the concept of what people understand by "their tribe" is one thing, changing sexual behaviours rooted in millions of years of evolution is a completely different game. Its also worth noting that we might not want to change these behaviours as we might have evolved this way for very valid evolutionary reasons.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:37 PM
0

You are talking about a person that was abused as a minor. Show some respect.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:48 PM
2

Yes, but what's "different" changes over time, it is also influenced by culture. Brunettes do not band together against blondes f.e. We have a tribal tendency and that can be manifested as racism, but not necessarily. Comparing that to masculine and feminine behaviour is not adequate.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:33 PM
27

Racism is not biological, not entirely at least. We seem to have loyalty to the tribe and in general we identify the tribe as the ones who are similar to us, but what the tribe means changes over time same as what we consider similar. Masculine and feminine behaviours are much more defined and comparing it is ignorant. Honestly, I really hope the MRM does not start behaving like feminists and starts demanding impossible changes to human behaviour to satisfy impossible and unproductive sense of e…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:01 PM
4

That is fair if a bit utopian.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:51 PM
51

Nothing. Its biological. I know some MRA are very utopian, but hopefully this movement does not make the same mistake feminist did and starts ignoring science, biology and evolutionary psychology in particular, to satisfy utopian objectives. The reality is that men compete among ourselves and enjoy protecting women while women like to bicker among themselves but band together when a man is in front.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:34 PM
1

No, because the morons have sympathy for women but not men, so they will always tend to favour women but deny privileges for men, so they would still oppose helping men, but now you can point the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:12 AM
7

There is a difference in the Milo situation that I do not understand why nobody is mentioning: Milo was the minor, not the adult!. Milo was a young boy who had a sexual encounter with an adult. Now Milo might have really been the instigator or he was convinced it was like that, we will never know the truth, but in any case it was the adults responsibility to behave, not Milo's. Now, Milo as an adult has processed this experience however he has processed it and has voiced his conclusions about it…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:29 AM
4

Next time I find a feminist I'm going to identify myself as a Muslim women transvestite and refuse to shake his hand. Let's see what happens.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:54 AM
20

The SJW are a left wing problem. There is no doubt about it. That not all the left is like that or that other groups have historically engaged in similar attitudes, does not change that SJW are a creation and a problem of the left.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 07:32 AM
19

Let's legalize murder too.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 08:03 AM
19

This is just a commercial tactic, playing on women's misery. What you have to do is make sure these tactics cost them money by never spending money in these places.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:01 PM
14

You are moving the goalpost. Of course, women should be able to be firefighters if they past the requirements (same requirement as men, no bullshit feminist double standards). Nobody is arguing against that. The point was whether men make better firefighters or not, and the answer is obviously yes. Does that mean that all men will be better firefighters than all females? No. But in general they will and by a big margin. Its not even close. You are trying to discuss for the sake of discussing.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:07 PM
10

A dick makes you a better firefighter because a dick means higher level of testosterone, better muscles and higher physical capacity. Saying otherwise is retarded. And yes quadriplegic man can not be a firefighter, if that is all you can say stop already.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:23 AM
175

Spanish laws on violence are ridiculous. They have basically banned self defense. When someone attacks you violently, if you do not want to break the law, what you should do is call the police and try to get out or if you can not just take it. Which is completely unrealistic because in a lot of violent situations you do not even get the chance to call the police. Note that they have not directly banned self defense but they have made it extremely hard to prove it was self defense. You are not at…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 08:52 AM
3

Are the men jockeys going to get a sex allowance to compensate too?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:13 PM
7

Do not touch our funding or more shit like this will happen. That was the warning and what the march was about.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:53 AM
18

It was a warning from the feminists to Trump to not touch their funding. Yes, most feminist associations promoting independent attitude live from the taxes of working class men they so much hate.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:06 AM
3

Wanted more money for which she needed a kid with him.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 10:30 AM
3

In entertainment there is some wiggle room for negotiation but in general whoever brings paying costumers in, gets more money.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 10:25 AM
8

Because white males have been conditioned to take it, they are easy prey. They would never dare do that with black men because they would not accept it and there would be a shitstorm. To keep the diversity consultant gigs and similar they need an easy mark, and that is the white male. It will stop when the white male says enough is enough. Sadly, it is possible that a lot of white males will be so enraged and at the same time happy with his new found powers after so many decades of abuse, that h…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 08:38 AM
7

Seriously? Feminism is embedded in the left and it is engaging in the typical lefty behaviour of infighting for extreme purity. I fail to see how it is not an appropriate comment. And I also fail to see why the comments bothers you so much. The right does also stupid shit, although in different ways, and it is also criticized here.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 01:37 AM
7

He is right though. The right have its own schism, but the left tends to do exactly what he says and I do not see why he should not be able to say it and at the same time you accept the criticism.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:49 PM
1

This is an absolute disgrace.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:13 PM
6

It was funny, but she should have pressed more when the moron said: "I would have never guessed that" Lauren could have accused her of being sexist and enforcing traditional gender roles by assuming gender roles because of how she looked. I'm sure she could even get the moron to apologize.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:25 AM
1

Because its where the money is. You guys keep thinking this is about ideology when it is about money. Women studies graduates and similar need to create histeria and bullshit so they can keep getting the government and private companies consultant works to fight patriarchy. For these people Trump's victory might not be so bad if he does not cut their gov funding, as now they have their boogie man they can manipulate and scare people with.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:55 AM
7

When you are fighting you are taking millisecond decisions and with limited information. You do what you can to not get hurt. Self defence should and can not be expected to be super precise. Accidents will happen. If the other person does not want to get hurt, he or she should not attack in the first place. Otherwise, the attacker should accept the consequences.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:47 PM
9

Its a "retirement job" for her. Its a job at a non profit as diversity official. It will have a wage that most normal working people will envy, but small for a "career women" like her and more importantly probably an end of the line job. She will be comfortable but it is game over.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 02:19 PM
10

They are not. Its the feminists that are like this. Always remember that despite their efforts to appear as such feminism does not represent the majority of women, usually less than 20% of women declare themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:27 PM
9

Its not a problem exclusive to identity politics, but to all types of class analisys. When you reduce people to class, whatever the separation you chose, you reduce people to a strawman. In your case for example the rich are not a unified front believed or not. And if you meet some of those mega rich people you like to fantasize about, you'd end up disagreeing with some and agreeing with others. Karl Marx himself was guilty of this. For example he claimed that the worker class need not listen to…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:10 AM
2

Why am I not surprised? I read the title and though: of course a feminist would say that.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:48 AM
10

You answered with a personal attack (you are a loser that only knows lesbians from porn) instead of attacking my arguments and offer an alternate explanation.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 12:34 PM
30

That does not explain the so common lesbian problem of "dead bedroom". The reality is that women like to be pursued, in heterosexual women you see how they sexually favor men that are forward and direct. Lesbian women retain that trait, they like to be pursued and when their partner takes the initiative. In heterosexual relationships this works because men like to be forward or at least most men do not mind being forward. In lesbian relationships you have both women waiting for the other to take…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 11:42 AM
2

They were classic liberals and their ideas live within libertarianism or "rest of the world" liberalism, but not in USA liberalism. Locke main idea was natural rights to justify the idea of property as an absolute right for the individual for example, which is something present in libertarianism but not in USA liberalism. BTW this is not some mistery or controversial idea. This is a generally accepted fact in political theory. USA liberalism is not really liberalism as understood classically or …
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:03 AM
3

Andrea Dorkin is not being tough in women studies classes as an example of a crazy radical but as feminist theory.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:55 AM
3

The unfounded proposition is that he will not pay out, that is yet to be seen, and you are assuming he will not and using it as a fact. How much more clear do I have to be?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:35 AM
3

You do not know that and are accusing someone you probably do not like based on what you think he will do in the future. That is hardly an argument. But even accepting your unfounded proposition for sake of argument, there have been a lot of feminist cash grabs. This is different, this is speech that can undoubtably be considered hate speech, extreme hate speech in my opinion because its talking about killing people not only discriminating, and it is accepted within feminism. Its not comparable,…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:04 AM
1

Yes it is. The schism happened with Roosevelt. Classic liberalism supports free markets for example.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:00 AM
4

Sure, but feminists themselves should reject these people instead of justify them as experimenting phase. It is absolutely damming that feminists have no problem accepting these people in their movement, to the point that feminists books with these opinions are part of the curriculum of some classes at women study courses. The opinions of this woman are not some random crazy rants that nobody within feminism accepts, her opinion is part of a respected faction of feminism, and that makes it a MRM…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:36 AM
2

Plus testosterone is a hell of a hormone and pushes you further, for the good and for the bad.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:27 AM
1

But USA liberals and progressives are not classic liberals. Classic liberalism in the USA is now called libertarianism (precisely because the USA liberals highjacked the term).
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:25 AM
4

Sure, not all marriages end up in divorce but the chance is high. And once you go to divorce your wife holds the cards. The issue is not whether it will happen to you, the issue is that it could. If this were any other type of contract nobody would sign for it and would laugh at anyone that accepted those conditions as stupid. But because marriage 2.0 carries an special aura from the marriage 1.0, men go for it. And I know that you as a married man prefer to believe that you'll be fine over bein…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:17 AM
6

At that point, why not leave the country and leave the gov and the bitch hanging? I mean this is a person and a system that rejoices in the fact that they are making you miserable, why show any kind of loyalty or honor towards them?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:39 AM
9

They accused and suspended players that were not even there, and for the ones that actually were there the video shows she was not forced. She just regretted it and decided to call rape instead of being an adult.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:33 AM
17

Robots. Which feminists will complain about because they are misogynistic somehow.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:30 AM
1

There is other unrelated stuff that also uses the red pill reference. It was a very popular movie and that particular scene entered the popular culture. The movie The Red Pill is named like that because it is the director's travel from a feminist who believes the mrm is "the devil" to realizing there might be another more correct reality, aka taking the red pill as Neo does in the movie. Also, if/when you see the movie you will realize that she interviews several people from the mrm, but she int…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:20 AM
2

When your job depends on not understanding something, you will not understand it.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:12 AM
92

It's all about money. Feminism has become a very profitable industry and these people do not want to let their golden goose go. It's that simple, there is no other reason. The rest are excuses.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:14 AM
1

The red pill documentary and the red pill community are two different things, they just share the name inspired from a movie.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:33 AM
6

Women are not more at risk of being assaulted in the street or murdered. Men are. Women instinctually like to feel protected and men instinctually like to protect women, that is why this patterns develop, not statistical reasons.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:58 AM
1

He was walking on eggshells the whole time.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 11:54 PM
2

He is correct, but knowing how present society works he could have worded it better. I get what he is saying, but he said it in a way that was easily miscronstructed and nowadays people are looking for opportunities to get offended, specially at college.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 06:11 AM
10

At this point, it would not be surprising if the daughter of someone with power was involved in the incident and they are making the kid pay by being uncooperative.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:28 AM
3

You can deny sex obviously, but you have a problem when you deny sex while being in a relationship where you demand sexual exclusivity. If you do not fuck your husband can you blame him if he goes somewhere?
/r/MensRights24/12/16 05:06 PM
16

Call it incredibly weak all you want, but it is working. Feminism has created the narrative that historacally and even now men were the privileged class and women were the unprivileged one. Most people believe this to be true and will consider you crazy if you dare question it. And thanks to it they are getting even more privileges from the government, including favorable laws and lots of money. So call it weak all you want, it is working.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:25 AM
6

Its starting to happen the same for fat men. I used to be an M sometimes an L depending on the brand. Now I am still an M for european clothing but if the brand is american I have to get an S. Its ridiculous.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:28 AM
1

First, I got title 9 mixed as I was referring to Ali's Dear Colleagues letter that forced colleges to create the kangooro courts otherwise they were going to lose financing. It was not a misapplication by colleges, it was a top to bottom order from the federal government, even if some colleges were already very eager for such madness. Now, referring to title 9, there is nothing wrong in principle on wanting equal treatment, but there are group activities that are done more by males and appreciat…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:39 PM
2

Do not let facts get in the software at of the narrative.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:14 AM
0

Misapplication? There has been no misapplication of title 9, its the whole thing that it is wrong.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:19 AM
5

Not only she will keep the kid, but she will get tax money for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 06:18 AM
7

This is so sad. That a mother would use her own kid for her own benefit in this way.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 03:12 AM
9

The thing is, the police can trick you, its legal, so you never really know if they are going to arrest you.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 06:43 AM
4

The Alt-right initially was OK, specially with social issues, but got invaded by white supremacist, using the anti Muslim sentiment to spread their ideas. I know that there are people in the alt-right opposing them but I do not follow the movement and I'm not aware which faction is winning.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 07:41 AM
1

yeah but if they're criminals, they're bad people, and if they're bad people, why should we care about too harsh? Only too lenient is worth caring about. Because there are degrees of crimes and people are not absolutely good or bad, but everything in between? It is completely normal to say that, for example, a guy that steals a radio player from a shop shop should receive less punishment than someone who murders with premeditation. There are crimes that deserve less punishment than others and it…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 07:37 AM
3

The public gives no shits about the gender of the person who coded their fucking iPhone. This comes from feminist getting into positions of power.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 07:36 AM
9

I really do not understand the need for having CCTV everywhere and have your live monitored no matter where you go. To me removing cctv's is always a good idea.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 07:45 AM
2

The dogma that men and women are biologically equivalent despite the ocean of scientific evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:11 AM
2

The funny thing is its mostly white people, usually with a decent amount of money, doing it.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:08 AM
4

No shame
/r/MensRights01/12/16 10:49 PM
3

Each side has its strength, but there is no doubt that the left is much better at political PR than the right. The left are the masters of twisting the narrative.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 05:54 PM
1

But with training you would be able to. A women (or at least 99+% of women) will never be able to do it, no matter the amount of training they go through.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 10:35 AM
5

This is absolute insanity. I do not understand how anyone would like to go to such a place.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:23 PM
7

White heterosexual males should apply claiming they identify as females.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:03 AM
7

Still, it is in very bad taste and I do not think these people use it as "just a joke", but as a nasty attack disguised as a joke. I will defend her right to free speech, the same way I think racists have the right to express their ideas, but at the same time I think they are discusting people and have all the right to denounce them.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 09:37 AM
1

Oil jobs usually require physical strength and are somehow dangerous. Mysoginistic mother nature strikes again...
/r/MensRights18/11/16 07:15 AM
2

I'll be very happy to be wrong, just too many bullshit going around to not doubt.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:23 PM
10

Yes, sounds like another "let's fix toxic masculinity" initiative by pretending they care.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:50 PM
5

She could have a point. It does not matter that domestic violence occur in similar numbers for both sex. She probably is just your typical man hating feminist and that is her motivation, but just because she has the wrong motivation does not mean we should not look into it. Maybe we find that it is true that men and women recover better if they are isolated from the other sex for a while.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:09 AM
16

Women have always been protected by men, and will probably always be since it is in our genes. This is the reason feminism works. My advice is not try to fight your natural instinct as a man of protecting women, trying to repress your own instincts does never work, but to extend that protection only to women you consider worthy.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 08:23 AM
5

But it is not only that feminists made an issue out of snow removing, from what I understood the new feminist system of removing snow first from the walk lines and later of the car lines was creating dangerous situations as cars circulated on snow. This is insanity, they are endangering lifes and they went along because feminism.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 12:16 PM
5

This was one of the articles linked from ops: https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=sv&ie=UTF8&nv=1&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.friatider.se/feministisk-snorojning-ett-hot-mot-stockholmarna&usg=ALkJrhixP-7nYdSo9QYDHZepO7NeFvRsIg Feminist snow removing threatening Stockholm Wtf Sweden!?!
/r/MensRights11/11/16 11:11 AM
1

Do you really think Trump's policies regarding the police is going to be much different than Obama's or would have been with Hillary? Apart from rethoric obviously. That is not to say that the state and direction of police is not worrying. The real problem is that the democrats have suddenly turn the sensibility knob to 10 and blame anything and everything on Trump as if they were not accepting without complaining the same policies from Obama. That is the real issue with all this reaction.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:51 PM
2

So your problem is with his rethoric, not for example with the fact that under Obama more brown people have died from drone attacks than under any other president and Hillary planned to continue doing so? Have you ever called Obama or Hillary Islam haters? Oh, but Trump said it would limit how muslims enter the USA (not even forbid), buhu, he is the devil... Can you see why people is tired of your shit and voted for a turd like Trump?
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:48 AM
6

I understand it gives you pleasure to feel superior and more enlightened than the rest, but can you please wait until Trump actually does something against those demographics to denounce it? Because right now the democrats are looking like a bunch of hysterical narcissists crying like babies. And acting this stupid only takes away from the causes you claim to care about. If Trump actually does something against them, the general population will be so fed up with your histrionics that they will n…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:09 AM
9

So you have to be progressive to piss off the progressives?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:01 PM
6

Let's use an example. One of the claims feminists always use is how they got the vote for women. This is first wave feminism, the sufragetes. Well, if you look into history you'll see in the USA the right to vote was linked to the draft. One of the biggest confers for women was that they did not want to be drafted and preferred to not be able to vote, if voting meant having to sign for the draft. So feminists made it clear that women would not be drafted, that voting came "for free". Yet, they m…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter