TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

acey Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by acey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

You're welcome! I have read up on sex and know how it all works pretty much, have a few ideas of things to try, etc., just need the chance to practice. Still, don't be shy about getting a manual -- a book focused on increasing pleasure and intimacy. It'll give you ideas for foreplay, not just intercourse. Amazon will deliver it in a package just like the others, and they're not written for virgins, but for experienced people, so it's no big deal if you have one. Another note -- even though it ca…
/r/seduction09/06/12 08:39 PM
4

Female here. There's no reason to tell someone you're a virgin if you aren't headed straight for sex. If you spend time going out with someone -- and it can be weeks! -- and fooling around with them and kissing them a little and touching each other's bodies, you'll be getting to know what turns them on and you'll start to feel more confident. Some people might want to have sex on the first date, but a LOT of people don't. Someone once told me that the thing it took him a long time to figure out …
/r/seduction09/06/12 04:36 PM
1

I'm sorry; it's a huge act with billions of dollars allocated to multiple causes, and it covers a very diverse range of topics, from teen suicide prevention to Nicaraguan refugees, and I haven't read all of it thoroughly enough to answer with a simple yes or no. I'm happy to answer questions about individual parts, though.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 07:21 PM
1

Which parts?
/r/MensRights16/12/11 07:12 PM
6

Just out of curiosity, how many feminists would it take telling you this before you believed them?
/r/MensRights16/12/11 07:02 PM
-10

Ours. That is, the laws that represent the views of society as a whole. And some of those are anti-feminist, too.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 06:59 PM
1

I am a feminist. I do not harbor beliefs and attitudes or support laws that are misandric and feminist. I have posted in this subreddit and elsewhere in favor of men's rights, and I have challenged people on this site who have said things against men. Those are my credentials. On the other hand, I do not yield the term 'feminist' to those who would co-opt it and apply it to include hateful views, whether those individuals are feminists or misogynists. In fact, I believe feminism where it encompa…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 06:37 PM
3

Female reader; love Seddit. Particularly appreciate the stories about how it helps decent but shy people maximize their social capital. There's also a neat phenomenon where overinflated strutters who post stories about how they sarged away or whatever in some online convo get a little dose of the truth. I'm thinking of a certain OKC chat that was posted about six months back.
/r/seduction04/12/11 06:37 PM
2

That sounds like George W. Bush. Who is not attractive.
/r/seduction27/10/10 10:46 PM
2

Some combination of ambition, authority, and consideration of others.
/r/seduction27/10/10 10:45 PM
1

Not to shit on your opinion, which I think is well-thought-out, but feminists are, I think, who this post is countering, not just females in generals. Not to shit on your opinion, but I am a feminist as well as a believer in men's rights, the goals of which I believe are in accord with the goals of feminism. I'm here in r/mensrights because I believe the real victory of feminism will be measured by the achievement of those goals I listed above. I believe in equal sentencing, and in recognizing t…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:18 PM
3

There's nothing to suggest that Mel Gibson isn't a crazy fuck. Not to mention, people who have been abused -- men and women both -- are often attracted to abusive types, which means they date one abuser after another. There's no doubt Gibson was at least verbally abusive and threatened physical harm. That's all on the tape.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:32 AM
2

--Female here. I want equality for everyone, and I don't want quotas for women in congress or science. That would not be equality. --I am okay with equality in healthcare spending, but I want a definition of that. --I am okay with equality in sentencing for crimes; that's part of equality. --I am okay with equality in child custody; see above. --I would also like to see women have to register for the Selective Service. --I don't think quotas for difficult or dangerous jobs makes sense--for gende…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:37 AM
4

Why isn't this the top comment? It's exactly the point. Moreover, if she knows you're attracted to her, and she's not attracted to you, she may want you to be her friend, but she is not yours. A real, actual friend wouldn't keep someone around for company knowing they were suffering.
/r/seduction07/06/10 07:26 PM
1

This does sound like a mix of walking the line and wishful thinking. Here's another perspective: I teach, and at the end of every semester, there are a lot of students that I'm really going to miss, and some of them even tell me they're going to miss me. They give me gifts and cards and write thoughtful notes about their experience in the class. Lots of them stay in touch. And I do miss them. I wish sometimes I could hold on to them. But that's not what a teacher needs to do. My job is really to…
/r/seduction09/05/10 07:29 PM
1

But theres just something about him - I feel like I just got to have him. That "something" is called transference. You have been going in to his office and confessing your most intimate feelings to him following a break-up, and he has to some extent helped restore your self-esteem by hearing you out, validating your feelings, and affirming your interestingness and appeal. That is, if your therapist is doing his job right, you will often have this feeling. However, if he's doing his job wrong, a …
/r/seduction09/05/10 11:03 AM
3

You're right. It's not. But someone has to feel something in order to write anything. You have to at the barest minimum feel like writing. And in order to write about other people's feelings, especially people you've made up, you have to have had feelings of your own in order to approximate a convincing description.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 02:36 AM
2

Maybe, but the point about teachers touching students is from a study of autistic students, and the article sort of hypes the finding a bit without context.
/r/seduction01/03/10 01:24 AM
3

Are you telling me that Hemingway's stuff isn't about feelings? Have you read it? It's all competition, drive, desire, love stories, war trauma, isolation, regret and people who can't talk to each other. The Old Man and the Sea is about a guy who really, really wants to catch a fish. Wanting is a feeling.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 01:07 AM
6

For my part, I downvoted you (and I'm only one of three) because you posted after I posted that I was a female redditor who supported mens rights. But I also downvoted you because the sheer scope of your comment -- the wording of which indicates that all of the women, including your mother, teachers, and other family members and friends in your entire life have been in opposition or neutral to the cause of your fair treatment and human rights -- reflects either such a blinkered worldview or limi…
/r/MensRights28/02/10 07:07 PM
7

This is great -- the law (state and street) is one place where our bad ideas about the "differences" between men and women exact the highest prices. If you look hard enough, you'll be unlikely to find many crimes that men have committed that women have not, and yet men are much more likely to be treated like suspects, accused, prosecuted, punished, and executed. I am not saying that the numbers of actual offenders are equal across the sexes, but the important thing--the real affront to justice--…
/r/MensRights28/02/10 05:48 PM
26

Female redditor & MR subscriber, also supportive of men's rights, as my mother and father raised me to be. I am also a teacher, and very attentive to the ways that men are casually depicted and described in my college classroom. For instance, I routinely challenge even comments potentially construed as innocent, like "Boys are so weird," "Real guys don't sit and write about their feelings," (O RLY, Shakespeare (Keats/Donne/Hemingway/etc)?), in my classroom through a variety of methods and even b…
/r/MensRights28/02/10 03:10 PM
2

I can't answer the question because I disagree with the whole concept of "settling". When I like a girl and she likes me and we are having fun, who the fuck is thinking of "settling" for the other? I agree. That's why I was curious about it. I certainly don't want to be with someone who's only with me because he's too scared to be single.
/r/seduction07/02/10 04:23 PM
3

I upvoted you. That'll have to do. ;-)
/r/seduction06/02/10 09:39 PM
2

Of course. And, for the record, I'm not chasing 10s--I like comfortable men who care about what they do and make interesting conversation.
/r/seduction06/02/10 09:12 PM
2

I see. But on the other hand she says "the 8 is not settling; the 8 is a catch." So I feel like she's using "settle" as shorthand for something different--she means "don't be so shallow." Which is good advice. I also think not grading people on a scale is a good idea. But that's another story. EDIT: Also, I agree with you about women & superficiality, but I think that's complicated. I've been turned off by something about a guy on a date only to realize later that he probably said or did that th…
/r/seduction06/02/10 08:40 PM
3

Female here. I'm curious: do men want to be "settled" for?
/r/seduction06/02/10 08:15 PM
3

As a female, I don't. Nothing to do with suspicion; everything to do with disliking halloween.
/r/MensRights31/10/09 08:11 PM
2

It sounds like you're hurt and suffering. I try not to give too much credence to conclusions I reach in that mindframe. I hope you'll find someone who can be tender and nurturing with you. On the other hand, in my experience, people who consistently become involved with drama queens are often insecure. As a result, they tend to fall for women who send broader signals, because they feel more confident approaching, and they don't even notice the quiet, decent women all around them who'd love to ge…
/r/MensRights22/10/09 07:57 PM
1

Yes--those would be the laws of nature. Again,"near zero" means it's not a no-risk activity, for either party. There are plenty of mutually agreeable no-risk (as far as pregnancy is concerned) sexual activities for men and women to enjoy, and men can also opt to have vasectomies, decreasing their odds of fertilizing an egg by mistake even further. If men want to engage in the kind of behavior that sometimes results in pregnancy, as in the situation you described, and men want their rights as fat…
/r/MensRights28/05/09 03:23 AM
1

I completely agree with you. Recreational sex with a condom is a perfectly reasonable low-risk behavior in the absence of unreasonable laws. But it's not a no-risk behavior. And, yes, "It's important to make sure that the costs incurred by a decision are borne primarily by the people who are capable of influencing that decision." That's why it's important for everyone to consider carefully before ever engaging in behavior that might result in pregnancy. Without a man's in-fluence, quite literall…
/r/MensRights27/05/09 08:13 PM
2

I agree with you to an extent, but we're not quite at the stage where women have universal access to the "choice" not to have a child. Beyond social pressure, there are very real economic and logistical hindrances to choosing to abort. Doctors are afraid to perform abortions, and some clinics have complicated access procedures to manage the risk for their employees. Lobbying for women's reproductive freedom--including access to (and the best education about the efficacy of) a wide-range of birth…
/r/MensRights26/05/09 10:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter