TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

acox1701 Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by acox1701 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Laughs in Vietnam
/r/MensRights06/08/19 07:28 PM
14

Also can't open their own business. I'm not sure this is true. In the novel, Our Hero's father was an exceptionally wealthy business owner, and had no use at all for citizenship. Frankly, I'd love to see a system like it in real life. It might not work as well as I think it would, but it might be a good place to start.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 07:27 PM
6

Judy Munro-Leighton - She says that she lied about writing the anonymous letter. Does that not count? It's not quite as serious about an actual false accusation, but trying to gin up an accusation by attaching your name to it is bad form, and also a false statement.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:29 AM
1

I don't like them. They put too much destructive power in the hands of someone who hasn't (necessarily) had any training in how to handle that power. They make it possible to conceal that power, and deploy it with little to no warning, with potentially fatal results. I shoot bows. Even if they were as destructive as guns, (which they aren't) you need at least a little training if you want to kill someone, or destroy their property. And it's very hard to sneak a bow into a place. I love bladed we…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:46 PM
1

Question not understood. Please ask again.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:35 PM
1

I would wish for wrongdoing/evil out of existance. I'd worry about that. Magic is tricky, and anything that touches on "free will" makes me nervous. Guns are just a thing. It would suck to remove a lot of things that are fun, but it is, at least to me, worth it. It would be the same as wishing out cars instead of irresponsibility/bad driving skills. Close. Cars provide a critical function, and their purpouse is to move things or people from one place to another. Doing things to make them safer d…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 05:47 PM
11

Appreciate the thought, but I don't own guns, I don't like guns, and if I could wave a magic wand and wish them out of existence, I'd do it in a heartbeat. I am, however, aware that they are a thing that exists, and that there are safe and unsafe ways to handle them. And I am aware that guns are not themselves evil, or even particularly dangerous, provided they are used safely. I also object to attempts to legislate away the second amendment under the guise of "gun control." If we want to remove…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 05:24 PM
16

Anyone who has a gun or has learnt how to deal with one doesn't pass a gun to anyone pointing anywhere but down. Nor do they pass a loaded gun to someone, nor do they store a gun loaded. Nor do they secure guns "in the top drawer" to protect their kids. There wasn't just a single case of poor weapon handling, there were many. Nothing suspicious about idiots with guns being idiots with guns.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 04:57 PM
1

I think if you bother to read you may discover the magic of hyperlinks to sources. I think you won't. You might find the addresses, but they aren't hyperlinks. Relevance: people skimming for sources might not see them, since they don't stand out.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:30 PM
3

IMO, he should have warned the lady "I don't do women's hair. If you want it hacked off, I can do that." And then cut her hair. I mean, women's hair cuts just the same as men's hair. It's just that women usually want more complicated procedures. That's what he's not qualified to do. He can do a buzz cut on anyone with hair.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:49 PM
1

Ever spoken to people who failed to commit suicide? Overwhelmingly, they don't try again. The attempt was a global minimum for them, and even something as simple as having to climb over a rail before they can jump is enough to push them back just once, and they don't get that low again. Others are in a situation that keeps them low, and they don't want to die, they want out of the situation. They see dying as the only way out. One lady who survived jumping from a bridge claims that the very inst…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 06:11 PM
2

In theory, yes. In practice, suicide prevention is reasonably well understood. Almost no-one actually wants to kill themselves. They want a solution to their problems, or at least to know that a solution exists, even if they can't get to it. Sometimes all they need is for someone to recognize that they have a problem. Shit like this is invaluable.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:40 PM
6

Baby steps.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:38 PM
5

The last time I checked, it was something like that. Maybe born female, identifying as trans-man, refusing to transition because he felt that the trans-was part of his identity. Or transitioned, and insisted on being a trans-man, instead of just a man. I just recall thinking it was stupid, and that they were just a man or woman with a desire to be "special."
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:05 PM
12

Nobody identifies as trans, that doesn't make sense. I've seen people who do. Mostly the kind of people that get mocked over at TiA, but they exist. Sane people don't identify as trans.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 07:57 PM
3

That's true for the most part. But if a normally manly-man wants to sit down and have a good cry, because it's just gotten to be too much for him, he cannot, as a social matter, do it. He can't turn to his wife or girlfriend in his moment of vulnerability, and expect to be supported. Instead he will be punished. Note, however, that this isn't a universal truth. Plenty of women can and will support their men, eagerly, even. Frankly, this should be considered a filter for who you want to have a re…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:08 PM
0

That's a poor argument. Some may find the strength to carry on. Some may find other outlets. Some may simply not suffer from it the same way others do. Even for someone desperate for help or attention or what have you, taking up a weapon and killing indiscriminately is something not done lightly.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:03 PM
1

Birth rates are not a concern for a football team, pizza place, or other random groups the way it is for a typical society, I can't remember the last time anyone in any typical society was concerned about birth rates, with the exception of people upset that Mexicans were breeding faster then good, honest white americans. Concern for children seems to be about the children that exist, not the children that might. We don't care much if women get pregnant, but once they do, we want to protect them.…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:17 PM
0

The word "our" refers to humans. It covers societies, yes, but also races, genders, football teams and pizza preference.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:04 PM
-11

If you were correct that our society values this Can you point to the word "society" in his post? Now, do you know what the word "subconscious" means? There are important parts of our brain that don't recognize things like refrigerators, or health insurance, or office jobs, or civil rights, or anything that has happened since the last time we killed and ate a Mammoth.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:32 PM
1

Ah, interesting. This still links back to the "disease" part of the problem, though.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 02:34 PM
2

occupational safety and health, disaster and emergency planning, Both of which are covered under "contain outbreak of disease." From Wikipedia: "Currently the CDC focus has broadened to include chronic diseases, disabilities, injury control, workplace hazards, environmental health threats, and terrorism preparedness. CDC combats emerging diseases and other health risks, including birth defects, West Nile virus, obesity, avian, swine, and pandemic flu, E. coli, and bioterrorism, to name a few. Th…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:56 PM
1

Did they concern themselves with climate change, or the possibility of an asteroid strike?
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:48 PM
41

It is important we remain consistent I'm OK with it being "bad form" to criticize someone for something over which they have no control. But it's got to be consistent. So, criticize or don't, but it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:50 PM
1

The times were changing whether or not law took effect. I would argue that the times changed because of the laws. I'm not as familiar with the details of the Women's Liberation Movement as I am with the Civil Rights movement, (which focused on the racial minorities) but the cases are similar. Citation needed on the assumption that women couldn't or wouldn't get hired on the basis of being a female. No citation is actually possible, but I would point to the extended years of women not working pro…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:49 PM
3

Yep. That's idiocy of the highest order. Equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 09:16 PM
2

I would counter that strong arming companies is ridiculous. I would counter that strong-arming companies is the only option. Did you note a rush of businesses opening their doors to black customers? Or did they have to be compelled to do so by law? Ultimately, if they overlook talent because genitalia, it's their loss, someone who isn't will take them in instead. Which explains why it was so hard for women to get into the workforce. Today, you may be right. I tend to think you are. But in days p…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 09:15 PM
2

They will overlook essential safety qualifications and basic strength if it means they hire a female over male. This is one of the most appallingly wrong uses of it. Nonoe should be hired for a job if they aren't qualified, and under no circumstances whatever should anyone be hired if they can't even pass basic safety. Bear in mind, I'm not saying that quotas are good, I'm saying that in some cases the used to be a necessary evil.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 09:05 PM
1

Likewise.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:36 PM
3

Well, fair enough. Good talk, though. EDIT: Sounds like your company is doing shit wrong. "Illegally practicing affirmative action" sounds to me like "illegal discrimination," but I doubt you'd get any traction in court. I maintain that sometimes, one has to use a shitty tool to get a job done. One should bear in mind, however, that the tool is just a tool, and it is not the job. Lots of people forget that, and seem to think that quotas are the end, rather than a means to the end. Either that, o…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:23 PM
1

Sure, the intentions aren't sinister, but you're forgetting the disastrous consequences of affirmative action and other such policies. No, I'm aware there are problems. I'm just suggesting that A) the problems can be mitigated by intelligent use of the tool, and B) it used to be a necessary evil, and it might still be. I'm always open to C) which is "a better option," and D) us not needing it anymore. The idea of "women in the workplace" isn't novel anymore, it's a given. If quotas are still nee…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:17 PM
4

Having something in place that ensures both genders are treated equally is vital, but quotas are the exact opposite of equality imo I would argue that it is, or was at one time, a flawed, but necessary tool. There used to be, and in some cases still are, places or at least people that simply will not hire a woman, no matter her qualifications. Possible reasons include base sexism, lack of confidence in a woman's ability to do the work, concern for the negative impact of introducing women into wh…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:34 PM
9

They're basically admitting that they're inferior to men and that without special concessions, they wouldn't be capable of obtaining the same job as a man based on their own merits and qualifications. The theory is that women won't get hired, regardless of their qualifications. I've seen it done, at least once. I think that today it's a tired mechanism, and in twenty years, will be outdated, verging on useless. Quotas aren't quite as insane as they are being made out to be here, but the way they…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 02:52 PM
3

Other subs ban users for concern trolling like this. And they are idiots. Guy is here, asking questions. if we don't want to answer them, it requires no effort at all to ignore him. hell, it takes MORE effort to engage. On the other hand, anyone who wants to have the conversation can.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:08 PM
1

I have no problem with the word "pansexual." As far as I can figure, it means sexually attracted to everyone, without easily defined limits. (you know, not everyone, but sort of everyone) I object to them using it to mean "everyone likes them," since that screws with my understanding of one of the few new words that we're supposed to be learning.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:18 PM
7

By what metric? It was clearly a sequel, or follow-on, or similar.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 05:06 PM
3

Point 5 is sort of what "reboot" means, isn't it?
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:38 PM
3

If you know Kate at all she’s this kind of pansexual beast where it’s just like everybody who’s around her falls in love with her and she’s so loving to everybody she’s around. Are these people deliberately trying to destroy the English language? Pansexual is one of the few "genders" they go on about that makes any damn sense at all, and here they are using it to mean "friendly." I'd take the entire SJW movement more seriously if they had some kind of vocabulary guidelines.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:36 PM
1

After 4 years enlisted, I have come the conclusion that "unprofessional" means "my grandmother would not approve of that."
/r/MensRights11/04/16 09:03 PM
3

These are seen as bad taste and may get you dirty looks or comments depending on the venue. There are times when it is not appropriate to use things from other cultures in a derogatory way. This is the level of seriousness that "appropriation" should be held at. "Bad Taste." "Inappropriate." It's when they try to elevate this to a moral failing, or a legal transgression that we have a problem.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:08 PM
0

It's a Department of Police, all of whom are Canadian, and Mounted on horses. Used to be the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, but they got rid of the Royalty, because of the Democracy seeping in from the south and the west, and then changed the order of the words to match up with the acronym /u/koji8123 used.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 07:53 PM
6

Mounted Canadian Police Department. After all, can you imagine anything more surprising that riding a horse into a $20 motel room to bust a prostitute ring? Hell, sign me up.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 04:11 PM
8

In which case she still doesn't need pockets.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:29 PM
12

Because they carry a purse?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:44 PM
1

You keep using this word "different." I'm OK with "different." "Lesser," I have a problem with.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/15 07:26 PM
0

There are plenty of problems women have. In some foreign countries, their problems are literally life-threatening. In the USA, the problems are far less severe, but they still deserve attention. And there are still at least some (I've encountered a few) that regard women as "lesser" in situations where it's inappropriate to do so. (any situation that doesn't require significant physical strength)
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/15 02:12 PM
11

I can understand that. But I have little to no emotional support to give. That's a muscle I've never worked out, because I just solve my damn problems.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:37 PM
6

Ugh, I hated that one. I liked the one with the tits.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:25 PM
2

Well, yea.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:21 PM
14

confusing alphanumeric index for episodes If "season 4, episode 3" is too confusing, how in the world do you keep track of all the goddamn characters, plotlines and backstabs?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:00 PM
1

I'm not sure the MRA wants more rights for men. They just want to maintain the rights we've got.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:11 PM
4

I'm not automatically distrusting the woman. I'm automatically distrusting the person holding a gun to another person's head.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:05 PM
6

If I went to the law, upset because I didn't like the color my neighbor painted their house, they would tell me to go away. This should also be the response to a complaint that someone got drunk, and did something stupid.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter