TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

acutepresence Archive

View 14 posts and 146 comments by acutepresence on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2064

Marriage/Childrenacutepresence/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:14 AM
358

False Accusationacutepresence/r/MensRights23/02/20 07:43 PM
231

Discriminationacutepresence/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:34 PM
140

Social Issuesacutepresence/r/MensRights26/03/20 01:44 PM
118

False Accusationacutepresence/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:17 PM
99

Social Issuesacutepresence/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:22 AM
68

Discriminationacutepresence/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:28 AM
65

acutepresence/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 11:04 AM
20

Social Issuesacutepresence/r/MensRights25/03/20 06:30 PM
13

Social Issuesacutepresence/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:43 AM
10

acutepresence/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 12:05 AM
4

Social Issuesacutepresence/r/MensRights01/04/20 12:38 AM
1

Social Issuesacutepresence/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:15 PM
0

acutepresence/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 05:49 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Utter disgrace. That lowly behaviour is undignified of anyone with even a semblance of decency
/r/MensRights02/03/20 08:09 PM
1

Well, the issue of influence on pregnancy aside, I think males should have an equal parenting leave and that it should be mandatory, you'd get rid of the pregnancy eschewment. I think males like having people around as well.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 12:40 AM
1

No, it never has
/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:15 AM
1

Sweden has a majority of males in the parliament. People are fortunately waking up to realise the disgraceful state of affairs as far as immigration goes, even if you still have those that want to be "good on paper".
/r/MensRights24/02/20 06:58 PM
1

Used to be in the top, at least...
/r/MensRights24/02/20 06:53 PM
1

I have no idea what kind of preconceptions you have about Sweden, but males are taken more seriously here than in the US, where you cannot even file a rape-claim as a male because you're excluded from the definition.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 06:52 PM
4

She should have had a harder punishment imo, but it's something at least
/r/MensRights24/02/20 04:52 AM
1

Well, she's Swedish and had sex at 15, so she likely wasn't ugly. No idea though
/r/MensRights24/02/20 04:49 AM
1

Poor boy...
/r/MensRights23/02/20 07:31 PM
6

No, the notion that being a boy means being a specific way, and that any aberration from that means being a girl, is the problem. The problem I do see with this text, however, is the following: When these beliefs are taken to extreme levels by boys and men, they result in poor relationships, mental health problems and risky behaviours. This effectively blames guys for being subjected to the sick expectations. Studies show that mothers, not fathers, are the perpetuators of these role expectations…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 06:31 PM
2

this study shows that NMC was associated with shorter penile length You know, I always suspected this, not only based on looks (American guys of European ethnicity vs their European brethren), but it makes sense too. The body's soft-tissues won't likely expand into a territory where it gets subjected to abrasion (or other physical stress).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 09:21 AM
6

This post is fantastic. Kudos
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 12:35 AM
6

The Sorrell study already shows it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 12:30 AM
3

Brave of him to approach a child like that at all
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:24 AM
-4

Let's hope someone introduces you to logic
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:37 PM
-6

I support the principle of being allowed to let in or refuse whoever you want to for whatever reason in a private establishment, but not allowing women inside seems a bit over the top
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:54 PM
5

It's disgusting
/r/MensRights21/01/20 08:27 PM
1

Yeah, that's a global thing unfortunately
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:50 PM
1

What did they protest against? Yes the males' rights groups need to be more organised
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:22 PM
0

It's a great country in many respects, undesirable immigrants are the problem. Also the ultracapitalists selling everything out...
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:21 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights08/01/20 07:45 PM
5

Well there is a lot of feminism here but males are also taken seriously. Like males can file for rape here, unlike in the US (bco Mary Koss and her likes). The stigma is still present though.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:31 PM
4

That woman laughing as he lies underneath screaming... 😡
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:19 AM
3

I hope he wins. God speed
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:31 AM
5

This is actually funny. Has to be satire
/r/MensRights26/12/19 11:09 PM
4

It's nauseating...
/r/MensRights24/12/19 05:37 PM
9

Well, the depravity of that woman aside, the major problem here is having a justice system that give them way.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:38 AM
9

Atrocious. That someone could be so consummately devoid of decency.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:21 PM
3

In spite of knowing that utterly despicable scum is way out of line, it makes me hateful, and I wonder if it's at all a good thing looking at it. It really isn't useful, there will be repulsive shites out there and getting worked up over it serves little to no purpose.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 12:01 PM
5

This is a good video that illustrates the norm enforcement difference. His teacher gives him a real hug, whereas his mother looks embarrassed and taps him on the shoulder. A girl even exclaims "he's crying!" with laughter in her voice.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:34 AM
5

It's sick. Did she face any consequences?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:32 AM
2

People are overly touchy about this and need to sober up. Yes there are toxic behaviours and phenomena in a great many things, and there are various ideals that pertain to what masculinity is that are undeniably toxic - hence the toxic forms of masculinity. Does that equate to saying that all masculinity is toxic? Of course not, nor is there any "standard masculinity". There are for example many forms of toxic parenting as well as many good ones.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:19 AM
4

That's a great post, do you have the link to the original one? Research has shown that mothers are the ones who perpetuate this sick standard, not fathers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-46241-001 Sure there are macho idiots out there who think that every guy is or should be like them, but I completely agree that females are an equal party to this problem.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:13 AM
2

Well that's kind of like how it works, if you say something offensive, reasonable people get upset.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:40 PM
5

I'm not circed, but I think it's more like a desecration of your most intimate, taking away not only life long pleasure, but leaving you dry, scarred and with emotional issues. It's dehumanising, made to make guys angry and unstable to make good soldiers. It's sick as it aims at your heart more than your body, but affects both.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:24 PM
4

Tiresome oaf, the fact that you can't relate doesn't make it propaganda. Lots of guys out there feel this way, and there's nothing feminine about it. No one is denying you the right to be who you are, especially not this post. It's a shame that you can't extend your fellow males out there the same courtesy.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:18 PM
2

Sickening
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:23 PM
8

To be honest I don't like the mrm portrayed in a relative stance to feminism, it devalues the mrm to being a primarily contrarian-movement and draws focus away from males and onto feminism.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:24 PM
6

Well correlation doesn't imply causation, no one can with certainty say why it looks this way, but seeing these numbers wouldn't really point you in any direction other than showing a current, factual, circumstance.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 09:52 AM
10

Honestly, I don't see how this graph would be offensive to even feminists, they're well-known distributions
/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:38 AM
35

I don't quite understand, where was it and why was it locked?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:13 AM
1

You're spot on ofc. The problem isn't really them helping girls, helping girls who have a tough time is a good thing. When they start blocking males, it becomes unacceptable though. They're not the only ones doing it either, the three large interest groups in keeping men suppressed are (ofc) misandrists, but also the industry and military. They depend on guys being disposable, which is why you'll see those elements in the MRM's as well. Guys need support groups of their own (especially young guy…
/r/MensRights01/12/19 05:43 AM
1

Do I know if that particular guy was forced? That is near impossible for me to know. Do I know that the vast majority of guys are forced? Yes. You seem to be the one of the few people here to require an explanation to how this pertains to male's rights issues. I'm guessing you're some kind of rightwing anti-emotion gun-nut/warhugger, a very unfortunate element of the MRM.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 03:05 PM
1

You're starting to sound like a broken record Billy. Did you even try to think about what I said?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:48 PM
0

The fact that you lack the chromosomes or braincells to understand what I'm saying doesn't make me a paedophile.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 05:25 PM
0

In all of your little tantrum I think you entirely forgot to call me a "cuck" and "faggot" as well. Getting rusty?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 05:18 PM
0

Okay bud. Time for a nap
/r/MensRights29/11/19 10:31 AM
1

Ok, now you've gone from being an annoying idiot to a lying stalker. I've reported you, and if it were irl I would likely press charges for libel/slander.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:37 AM
0

It really is sickening how people will start getting off to the sound of their own voice. You've stopped using your brain, eyes and ears, ignoring what I'm saying so that you can stand there shouting, red in the face. Being that lowly is a choice, get your act together and start behaving like you're civilised. Or rot in your own bile, whatever, stop manuring the internet with your hate though.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:35 AM
0

Ok, now you've gone from being an annoying idiot to a lying stalker. I've reported you, and if it were irl I would likely press charges for libel/slander.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:26 AM
1

Amen. The Pygmalion effect, where people adapt to the expectations placed on them, is real and also a factor here. If guys are told stuff like this all the time it will affect the way they behave and feel about themselves. I hate the notion that some people have that males feel less, I reject the idea entirely.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 07:40 AM
1

It's a disgrace.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 07:30 AM
0

A lot of people are emotionally unstable and take it out on the people that they can, I guess some parents seeing their children as extensions of their egos doesn't help either, or delude themselves that what they're doing is "for your own good" as a sort of corrective measure - entirely clueless of the big picture though. You can and should break that kind of power dynamic when you get old enough though, you're not a litlte kid he can push around and treat any way he wants to anymore. It might …
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:46 PM
2

Well you don't need to send people out to war for that. You should learn vital life-level lessons, vital skills and self-reliance as a part of your upbringing. If anything, what's crippling people today is the surveillance and arbitrary authority culture where people will literally not be allowed to cross the street alone until they are 15, whereas 13-year olds would go backpacking alone through Europe in the 80's. People are not even allowed to use the bathroom in school without prior permissio…
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:32 PM
3

Men who put down other men for showing emotion are just resentful bc they feel like they cant I think it's about vicarious embarrassment as well, because a lot of guys have internalised a sense of inferority, feeling even uglier for crying, and another guy doing it in front of them triggers a sort of corrective social admonition based on nothing other than his own lack of feeling self-worth.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:21 PM
2

This photo captures several large issues regarding males in a nutshell. A guy forced out to war, a dad literally walking through trenches during a world war to find his son, and when he does, sleeping next to him. It's a very strong picture, and I think it's a good place to show it.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:10 PM
1

Get your mind out of the gutter dude
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:03 PM
4

Yes they did indeed sleep
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:01 PM
3

Idk, I think they might. It depends on the person, I don't think it's a gender-issue tbh.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:01 PM
2

Well, there are certain things one can wait to learn. People should have as safe and pleasant of an upbringing as possible, you shouldn't send someone that young out anyways.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:00 PM
2

Lift your gaze, my friend
/r/MensRights28/11/19 08:57 PM
2

Quite likely he was forced, but I meant it in the way that it's always the young guys who are forced to do the fighting.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 05:24 PM
1

This is an appropriate sub
/r/MensRights28/11/19 04:54 PM
8

A guy forced out to war, a dad literally walking through trenches during a world war to find his son, and when he does, sleeping next to him? You don't see how that is pertinent to several large issues regarding males?
/r/MensRights28/11/19 04:53 PM
0

I am neither, but I'm not surprised, you sound like the kind of guy who would rather reach for a pitchfork than actually think about things.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:27 PM
1

It's inconsequential. It entirely depends on the context and person. Abuse is always abuse, but that is not automatically the case just because they have/want a relationship. In the case of e.g. Emmanuel Macron (and others) it wasn't a problem that she was his teacher.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:47 AM
0

Absolutely not. Children are always off limits. Everyone is different though, you can't draw a line in the sand and say "here's where you're allowed", and the younger the person the far fewer there are likely to be who would qualify, but they are there are and you can't ignore them even if you'd prefer that the world fit your image of it.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:35 AM
0

Well you're out of line if you think that you can dismiss it that easily. Your reaction is kneejerk, I doubt you've ever come in contact with the very few people that it would suit. Nevertheless I won't waste my time arguing with someone who would rather yell than talk.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 02:58 PM
0

Well, there's such a thing as law and ethics, and mob rule doesn't something wrong. You may disapprove all you want, everyone has an opinion, but that says absolutely nothing about the merits, values or nature of what you scorn. I don't think you know what that word means, paedophilia is a pathology, children are always off limits, and I advise you to be careful with what slurs you throw around at and accuse people of. I'm well aware that the ultraconservaties that belong in the middle ages use …
/r/MensRights26/11/19 05:29 AM
-6

This is a 13-year old. This is a 24-year old. Even though there are generalisations, there are no absolutes in this context. You cannot quantify quality, everyone is different, and tbh it's not for you to judge them.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 11:15 PM
-6

It's more that the places where the age of consent is older are the only ones actually doing it right Hah, hardly. The medieval morality is certain places of the world is appalling. And no, at 14 years 97% of males are mid to late-stage puberty. ​ You could never relate to them on any fundamental level People keep saying that as if you need to be able to discuss quantum physics or taxes with whomever you are seeing. In any way that matters, the younger you are, the more likely you are to be in t…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 10:21 PM
5

In this age-span, I don't think it's so clear cut, and I definitely think they should not be addressed as paedophiles - which is in this case used as a legal term and not the scientific pathology - because it hurts real children by devaluing the term. Certainly any form of abuse is depraved, and the younger the victim is, the harder the punishment should be, but it's not always necessarily the case that it is abuse. Age of consent laws are drawn differently all over the world, over here in Europ…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:24 PM
1

I don't have time to do your research for you. I do think there are differences for sure, we will probably have very different opinions of what they amount to though. I've no more time for this, bye bye.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 04:04 AM
1

Then you need to look harder, or read scientific journals. You choose who to be, the human has a huge capacity. There is no default predisposition, you choose a path, do not blame nature. I suppose righteous objection or proponing virtue can come across as smugness in the eye of the receiver...
/r/MensRights24/11/19 01:20 AM
3

If nothing else there might suddenly be an outrage against the avarice in power that sends its supposed people to war.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 07:07 PM
1

Repulsive. Speak of yourself please, and perhaps of those that would consider yourself your kin, but not of males in general. Every rational choice is based on a subjective value outset, and the type of progress and virtues you put forth are the basest of humanity. Go and relish in your perceived nature all you want with your troglodyte friends, but do not think for a second that it isn't something you choose to do, and if you never chose it, then you are an animal indeed.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 06:14 PM
1

No they don't. Hahaha "Carl Lewis (born July 1, 1961) is an American former track and field athlete who won nine Olympic gold medals, one Olympic silver medal, and 10 World Championships medals" Here's a long list of other vegans you can browse through. ​ dietary cholesterol along zinc and vitamin d3 (which are essential for the production of testosterone) can be found only in animal products Zinc: "With adequate zinc in the soil, the food plants that contain the most zinc are wheat (germ and br…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 04:37 PM
4

He knows that he's losing his dad for a long time, and probably that there is a high risk of him dying.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 03:59 PM
1

Who knows
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:41 AM
0

Vegan athletes outcompete others in marathons, the olympic etc. Many of the world record holders and olympians are vegan, have a look at wikipedia. Also there is no deficiency of cholesterol in vegan food, there are two different kinds, LDL and HDL, the bad and the good kind. The good kind is profuse in vegan food, the other kind that clogs up your system is what you get from animals.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 03:00 AM
3

Masculinity (we could also say alpha mindset) typical Beta behavior as they get used to seeing other men having sexual intercourse with their mates, a very submissive behavior skinny beta cuck who focuses on emotional self-awareness This kind of bilge is what gives this sub such a bad reputation. Alpha and Beta? "Cucks"? Shunning emotion? It comes across as a troglodyte credo or caricature of the bad stereotypes of the male's rights movements than anything else. Anyone who claims to hold intelli…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:55 AM
7

Well, what else would a man-eating dog say...
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:04 PM
2

Maybe they didn't make one because they had a difficult time in deciding between celebrating the international toilet day that's on the same day (not joking) and the international men's day.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:03 PM
2

This kind of thing has to stop immediately. Are there no just people in a position influence that could launch an inquest and reformation?
/r/MensRights12/11/19 10:57 AM
1

Labour, which most of the things I mentioned earlier amounts to, is something that women are far less likely to be even remotely equally capable of, especially after having had kids. Regardless, your example really demonstrates nothing, it can even be considered an argument against your stance, considering that both males and females are key factors to reproduction, whereas males are crucial for survival in a way that females during that day and age wouldn't be able to match in terms of labour, …
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:20 PM
2

He should be so lucky
/r/MensRights23/10/19 10:49 PM
9

More likely to discredit the male's rights movement.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:22 PM
1

Oh? Foregoing the issue of innate value, which you seem entirely willing to dismiss offhand (which I certainly wouldn't), how do you suppose that those droves of mothers who recently had children feed themselves, clothe themselves, keep safe and sound, while taking care of those kids? Even if one were to assume that expendability only amounts to survivability at point zero (which it doesn't), you can't demonstrate that males would be any less valuable. If anything, under those conditions, males …
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:20 PM
1

That would be illegal here. It's blatant sexism and would likely amount to a crime in more than one way, I hope you report him and take it as far as you can - the principal, police, media - whatever. If people don't speak up things won't change, and that shithead is wreaking having. Also you might want to introduce him to the pygmalion effect, and oecd statistics on unfavourable treatment toward males. If you don't want to confront him, leave printouts on his desk or send an e-mail with the link…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:57 PM
28

Looks fake tbh. You'd have to be a basket case to so flagrantly instigate violations.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:47 PM
1

Well, that's subjective, so speak for yourself. While males are treated as disposable all over the place, that doesn't make them so in any way.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:02 PM
1

Why don't you lift your level out of the sandbox and tell me exactly why you think that's the case. And be specific.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 11:29 PM
1

we are biologically expendable That's your own interpretation/opinion/inference - entirely subjective.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 11:08 PM
1

Well, if it is indeed your opinion that men are in themselves expendable, I don't see what kind of rights you could possibly argue for. Then again, perhaps you're not for males at all, which makes me wonder what team you're on and what kind of attrition you're in favour of.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:07 PM
1

Having that kind of opinion, you really shouldn't be on this sub to begin with.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:33 PM
1

It would be far better to stop pitching to various interest-groups and simply push for males and ignore the rest, based on a sound ideology and a constructive approach. Whoever wants to support that can, and more than likely you'll get support from reasonable people. Profiling this sub toward minority interests makes me less interested in it automatically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/19 09:50 PM
1

Too bad it's behaind a paywall, can't read it. Edit: So from what I can tell he had a creepy smile and touched a girl on the arm without saying anything. It's creepy, yes, but I've no idea how they go from there to sexual assault, it's absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 10:14 PM
1

...and by inference I assume that you're trying to say that "white people" are inherently negative here in some way. I've no idea why this bilge is allowed here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 10:11 PM
2

The addition of "white" in the headline is more than a little brazen, I might add. If there's any racist epidemic unchecked it's in the rap/hiphop/etc-cultures - which are more than nasty and overt. I don't see the point in posting that here anyways, it's a helicopter-mom who got upset over the word "triggered", if anything her behaviour toward her sons is more than a little concerning...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 10:02 PM
2

I don't know where you're from and what you're going through, but I'm sorry to hear that you have it so hard. Over here, things are changing - slowly - but they are changing. There are a lot of vested interests in keeping males suppressed from both the industrialist side (who wants an expendable workforce) and various other political interest (who act on malice and spite), but more and more people are recognising it. The most visible changes are in the boys, who are no longer treated like (or ex…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:34 PM
2

Name checks out. Begone please. ​ Men are expendable. Speak for yourself.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 08:50 PM
5

Quite a few girls and women are sympathetic for sure, and more than a few girls and women out there are fed up with those who would misrepresent their interests under the banner of "feminism". The biggest issue with a lot of (self-proclaimed) MRM's is that too much time is spent attacking various idiot feminists rather than lifting males and their issues, which inevitably makes those groups look like they focus on hating females - which inevitably hurts the male rights-movements. They should be …
/r/MensRights18/10/19 08:45 PM
7

Irrespective of societal illness, it's still sexist.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 08:01 PM
1

No, because a feminist made sure to change the CDC and FBI definitions so that it only applies to females. That same monster has even gone on the radio saying that males, even when drugged and rape, can never call it anything other than "unwanted contact", because of a number of dehumanising opinions of hers (that are entirely unscientific ofc). It's sick.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:55 PM
1

At first I wasn't sure if you at all understood what I'm saying, or if you were merely being wilfully obtuse, but looking at you now even flagrantly lying about what I've purportedly said, you're quite obviously more than toxic influence and anything other than a male's right advocate or scientist. You're not even close to a respectable person, gaslighting and misrepresenting me quite so maliciously. You're a self-serving liar, stay away from the male's rights movement and go gaslight someone el…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:25 PM
1

Wow. Ok, so even if I were to accept the conclusion that your study (sponsored by a Eugenics society no less) from the 1960's claims, you have a two square millimetre difference in areal between males and females, which would lessen the volume of the very first tear (assuming an average of 1 ml) by a 1/25th of a tear. Congratulations, you almost made a 1/25th of a point, assuming people only cry one tear - now all that remains to be shown is the relation between tearduct-sizes and the emotional …
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:02 AM
1

Males commit suicide - yes, but there isn't really much of a mental health sector or help to be provided for everyone except for in few countries (which does not include the US), this is also anecdotal. Science is neutral, and every proper scientific study has a representative basis, including gender as a factor. Yes there are a multitude of societal failures toward males. The brain and its links to emotions are very complex, but there are correlations established between a multitude of factors.…
/r/MensRights17/10/19 08:07 PM
1

I have seen no data saying that it fails for males, the only report I've seen is that some issues might manifest differently for some men. For sure having a meaningful life would prevent people from getting into a place where they're feeling bad, but it's hardly a way out for those that are in pain, and hobbies/professions/work do not make up for any of the numerous other factors that affect a person's emotional life. Apples and oranges. In general, the notion of getting rid of mental health iss…
/r/MensRights17/10/19 04:50 PM
1

I think that's entirely incorrect for the vast majority of young guys with troubled inner lives. Sure, all young people have a hard time expressing themselves because they haven't had enough time to spend on introspection and putting words on their feelings (as well as being suppresed), but then you give them those tools and help them step by step. I have personally talked to loads of young guys who were suicidal, every single one was aching for someone to listen to them and to talk. Distraction…
/r/MensRights17/10/19 03:19 PM
1

Well, unless you're mentally challenged somehow you will have no problem getting it, it's not complicated even if they might try to make it seem that way. You seem more like a troll out to discredit males by posting that here. Make sure that whoever you have sex with wants to first (regardless of if it's body language or expressly verbal), if they say "no", show discomfort or resist in any way, stop, back off and clarify without pushing.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 03:11 AM
1

Everyone is an individual for sure, but rest assured that there are plenty of guys out there suffering in involuntary silence and emotional suppression (by both males and females). Lots of guys need to and want to talk, and they shouldn't be shamed for that, even if there is no panacea and other methods might help better for other guys.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 03:00 AM
4

The most inane part is about "good faith". Good faith in spite of blatant insults, dehumanising, sexism and belittlement - you would have to be severely mentally challenged to not connect those dots.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 02:50 AM
2

Well, unless you're mentally challenged somehow you will have no problem getting it, it's not complicated even if they might try to make it seem that way. You seem more like a troll out to discredit males. Make sure that whoever you have sex with wants to first (regardless of if it's body language or expressly verbal), if they say "no", show discomfort or resist in any way, stop, back off and clarify without pushing.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 02:48 AM
5

Tbh there should probably be another sub that's more streamlined at focusing on males, empowering and raising awareness, and less criticism of the various evils in society, even when it's justified. Alienating girls and women serves no one, and they often want to (and do) help in my experience.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:27 AM
3

Who encouraged this state of learned dependency on a woman? Don't acknowledge their patronising slander as fact. Anger may be as justifiable or unjustifiable as any other human emotion For sure, and it's designed to be offensive, so don't take the bait, it's designed to sink you, inside and out.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 08:37 PM
1

Men are not "broken women" What exactly do you mean by that?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:07 PM
11

Had no idea, quite sick imo. Someone should do an exposé on that tbh. Tbh I think that sub is mostly an organised attempt at spindoctoring and influencing from a misandrist perspective.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:06 PM
19

Well, when you're vulnerable, it's easy to be manipulated. I truly hope that no one walks in there and gets more abuse.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:51 PM
40

It looks that way for sure. Too bad that there are guys who stumble in there looking for help.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:43 PM
1

It's a joke. Half of the posts are by males who talk about their issues, but they're never lifted. The kind of junk that is lifted, and defended by the mods, is always attacking and denigrating masculinity (a conmcept they have taken upon themselves to define), and occasionally outright misandrist and dehumanising.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:21 PM
1

Mediocre? Not even close. Nasty. Also I don't with those ideas of perfection.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:28 PM
3

Good initiative. Who made the pics?
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:18 PM
13

- Desensibilisation (pic), physically, and thus leads to a lack of sensuality - Higher emotional instability and tendencies toward aggression, if done without anaesthetics - Dries out the natural moisture of the skin lining, which lowers the resistance against infections, and drastically increases the risk for neatal stenosis - Loss of one of the most sensitive parts of a males body, the neuron-density in the foreskin is one of the highest in the body - Thus a lifelong loss of pleasure, and in t…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:57 PM
9

Still kinda weird to have kids pushing messages It's not a random message by an external interest. He has a penis, and quite likely he has an opinion about it. Children need to be respected.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:40 PM
2

Well if they can barely express themselves then why take that opinion into consideration anyways. It's nasty.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:38 PM
3

All of the above, but in different ways, and at a great scale. The odiousness of that nasty shite. Mocking males for having a heart even. Nasty and evil.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:31 PM
1

Yes well like I said, that's a completely different analysis, where you weigh in valuations. Coin per hour, it's an undeniable fact. Is that right/good/fair? That's a different question. Intellectual honesty please.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:29 PM
1

There are many of them, the latest one I've heard of from a central level is from the EU statistical organ, find it there yourself.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:03 AM
1

Well, he's a public figure, a near head of state, and the only person referenced in that article as working against antisemitism, which by wikipedia's standards means that he is prominent. Saying that "Sweden has significant issues with antisemitism" is not warranted, other than the actions of the foreign elements. Feel free to counter any of my arguments rather than disqualify me, and be specific. The reality of the situation is what it is, but the interpretation is highly subjective, and in th…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:23 PM
-2

The measurements are by time, and the comparisons on that chart are by sector. Doesn't matter how you look at it - all other factors ignored, women make less money per hour in all except one sector (the governmental).
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:19 PM
0

Ironically enough, under the Wikipedia-article one of the former deputy Prime Minister's of Sweden was mentioned as an advocate in the combating of antisemitism, the only notable person to be mentioned. On reading those criteria, it's fairly clear that only of them amounts to anything amounting to bias - the "double standard", but that could be based in any number of valuations/manipulations/dishonesties/etc. "Demonisation" is a general human rhetoric as well, and may have any number of motivati…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 12:15 PM
1

Circumstantially, there isn't a single correct or incorrect choice. As in one blanket answer, you mean? No, I agree, it depends on the circumstances and the context, which is why I said that it's impossible to know. If there is no immediate risk that cannot be reasonably averted before confronting, you certainly owe the people you love that much imo.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:04 AM
2

I had no idea. It's a new era I guess, thanks for spreading the word!
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:00 AM
1

The woman did what she should have done Oh? You don't even owe the people you love the benefit of a doubt? Not a good stance imo, I think you should confront them first, without involving the child ofc. If there's a risk involved, then maybe you can call the cops first. Yeah the police over there seems like they go about everything hamfisted. I saw another article about a boy who was put in shackles and dragged out of school without him being investigated, and then restrained for months, still n…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:52 PM
2

It would be good if members of the Jewish community here in Sweden who are indeed against the circumcision-practice (as many Jewish people seem to be in the USA) spoke up about it, because I honestly think that your religion has a much heavier impact on policy than the others who are against a ban - for cultural reasons, historical reasons as well as general amiability-reasons. So far it's only the official voice from Aron that's heard from the Jewish side.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:38 PM
1

There are degrees of it, it's mostly like you say ofc, most often you don't have to because there are lotions etc, but sometimes a partial circ is done, and rarely a full one, for medical reasons.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:35 PM
5

It's sick. The entire party leadership were opposed, which flies in the face of their voting m.o. and ideology - neoliberalism. Probably only a rhetorical disclaimer, but still.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:32 PM
21

So sick. On a line even, like some production facility, their nudity and mutilation at public display. Sick.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:16 PM
5

He's asking what road to take ahead. He loves the woman and her son, but the consequences have been way too hard for him to simply act like nothing happened. The boy that accused him did so out of fear, he was indeed molested but by another kid, he was afraid so lied when pressured about it. Is it reasonable to forgive a seven-year old boy who was violated, and lied to not be hurt again because he didn't understand the consequences? Certainly. Children make mistakes. The problem here has to do w…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:48 PM
-7

There are a multitude of studies that show that the pay is eschewed toward favouring males, measured in coin per hour. The real issue doesn't have to do with that, it has to do with the valuation of the reasons. There's nothing to be gained from trying to obscure that.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:29 PM
2

I think the real issue is that people think that logic precludes emotion. They're entirely different things - but yes of course you need both and you always do have both, because any assertion that's logically founded still ends up in a subjective stance which has an emotional basis.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:26 PM
1

Those perpetrators are sickening, but not much more than the people who immediately cast him in shackles, didn't investigate, confined him, and then let the scum simply go. All of them are criminal but the boy.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:21 PM
2

What a nasty shite.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:15 PM
0

Well, that's what preparing for failure would amount to - that it not only can happen, but that it will happen, and that that's only to be expected. To this you could either add "and that's totally ok", or the opposite - "if this happens it means you're more of a weakling/loser/failure in life/(etc)". The difference in the valuation lies whether you think that that's natural and therefore of course more than acceptable, or if you shun/shame/disregard/criticise/censor someone for that failure, co…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 07:51 PM
1

That's more about not preparing people for failure, the valuations inherent in the most common value structures of today do largely value financial success, academic/performance-related prowess, vanity, social status etc. If humility, compassion, and getting social support/comfort/consolation for admitting defeat and backing out was the general response, he would have. Personal humility also plays into it, people are drilled to raise their nose habitually, to never concede points but instead fin…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:48 AM
54

Well I guess that's what society tells you. If you're not "a winner" you're a loser.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter