TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

adam_lanza_fan Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by adam_lanza_fan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Your kind can't complain about ugly humans being made when you won't say no to fucking ugly women. It's that simple. If you want prettier people only fuck pretty people. I only ever fuck way above my league. I practice what I preach.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 09:29 PM
1

Well ugly females coundnt pass on their ugly genes if they couldn't fuck Chad because Chad rejects them. Obviously. You can't blame female hypergamy because if ugly females still fuck the best they can get it's not females who are creating the ugly children since they are trying to mix their ugly genes with best ones they can get. It's the Chad males fault for not rejecting her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 09:20 PM
1

And what do you think they would say? Because everything you've said in this thread is stupid nonsense so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 09:19 PM
1

Most of the time the sons inherit their moms ugly/average genes. If Chad said no to ugly women that wouldn't happen. So why can't your gender use consent? Is that creepy that men on this subreddit keep implying males can't say no to sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 09:08 PM
1

Unless you are me you can't really tell me what I think is hot. So you are simply wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:53 PM
1

people are attracted to attractive people and what's attractive in a biological sense doesn't change What's attractive in a cultural sense does change so there's no such thing as biological attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:39 PM
4

If anything the terror from witnessing the polyamory is causing the incel terrorism. It's like a trickle down of terror.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:37 PM
21

I hope not because of my hatred for humans and my jealousy they are getting intimate when I'm not. But probably, and in part that makes me happy because it means more will die.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:31 PM
1

I'm female bodied and I was forced not to have contact with friends outside of school growing up. Today I only physically speak to one person all day. I've been neet for 12 years and I've never had a job. I think I'm fine. I wouldn't want to talk to a lot of people, unless it's like this on reddit anonymously. I think if I lived a normal life it would be exhausting & terrible. I feel happy how I am. So that's mostly why I asked why.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:27 PM
6

Imagine a virus wipes out all beta males. Beta females who can't be chosen for alpha Chad's harem pair off and trib all day. They all turn butch and work out a bunch in an attempt to fix their broken egos from being rejected by Chad. They decide if they can't have Chad they will create a society of only ftms that they dedicate their lives to becoming. After intense years long body building, training, tribal scarification, & tattooing they've transformed themselves into enough of diesel dyke bull…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:10 PM
1

So according to your theories about sex & danger & taboo, which guy in this pic is more dangerous: https://imgur.com/soYkF5A Is it the ugly one because if the woman sleeps with him she will produce ugly fat children?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:00 PM
1

Only a few posts up, you said: But all you're really doing is linking up danger and sex which is well established and has absolutely nothing to do with physical attraction So what if someone is physically attracted to a 2 year old. A 2 year old doesn't look like a human because they are not physically developed. They might be becoming a human but they aren't one yet. Yet a 2 year old can't cause anyone harm. Sure if you are caught fucking one people should cut your head off but the 2 year old it…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 07:09 PM
3

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 06:45 PM
7

I think the internet is a primative first attempt at telepathy. Same as the invention of language. All these inventions seek to bring humans closer. What would work a lot better is shrooms & psychedelics. It's a untapped market to feeling the connection that everyone seeks. And it's a natural machine that's been around longer and knows more than current man-made algorithms, as amazing as those might be. The time that shrooms have spent alive makes them a bit smarter than both us (humans) and our…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 06:43 PM
1

You said attraction to non humans is linked to danger. But children in apperence are non human looking since they are not developed. And there's nothing dangerous about children.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 06:30 PM
1

My point still stands you said pavlovian response is linked to danger. How can you link danger to something that's not dangerous such as a child if it's a pavlovian response? Maybe you didn't say it's at the core of women's sexuality, excuse me for using gendered terms there that was a mistake. You said it's at the core of taboo attractions. Regardless of what gender has the attraction. But it can't be danger related pavlovian response if the object of desire is not dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 06:11 PM
1

So those people are suddenly low quality in terms of evolution, as they can't reproduce. If anything viruses favor evolution because they cull the herd faster and better than just female selection; on top of horizontal gene transfer causing massive mutations. Look at transitional fossils. Study Darwin here. Yes they are objectively low quality because covid is killing people at the health bottom: obese people, cancer patients, diabetes. That's doing the exact same thing that a woman's pussy does…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 06:01 PM
1

But people plan to make sure the child is happy by planning what they will do to make sure that happens. This logic is really simple. And yes the father is only if he can manage it. Only the top 20% or much less is capable of spreading their genes widely because they are the only ones with genes worth doing that with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 05:49 PM
1

Well if you agree here than that destroys your pavlovian response theory. Are you are trying to imply that when a child is molested they trauma pair bond to their own child body rather than the perpetrator? Because just a second ago you said danger was at the core of women's attractions so wouldn't your original logic follow that a molested child would pavlovian response seek those who remind them of their perpetrator rather than victimize others in the same way they were?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 05:23 PM
1

Take pedophiles for example, do you think they feel threatened by children? Do you think they feel like they are in any danger when they molest children? That's a taboo with no danger attached. So your danger analogy makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 05:13 PM
1

I'm linking it to non humanness. Something non human can be small and non threatening. That's even more taboo for a female if you are establishing they are attracted to danger. Again, taboo means to rebel against what society is telling you you are supposed to enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 04:58 PM
1

If culture points to what's attractive that means that alterations beyond tattoos and piercings become attractive as well if not for their taboo aspect alone and nothing else. Since humans are being fed the information that those traits are supposed to be unattractive. Like telling a childish immature kid not to do something they will want to do it more out of a rebellious attitude. Taboo forms the basis of many fetishes that deal with actions. Like pegging because it's shameful or some shit. So…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 03:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter