~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | X-post from r/sex. I'm 17 and its become clear to me my mom has sexual feeling towards me.Um you do realise (ignoring the uhh situation) that if you are 17, you, your mother and girlfriend are committing a crime, of child pornography, you're committing it to the largest extent since, you are sharing the pictures to your gf. While your gf and mother would be committing possession, you yourself are spreading child pornography a rather serious offense and basically I suggest you delete those and ask your gf to do the same. In terms of the situation its kind of impossible to gauge withou… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/12 01:39 PM |
| 1 | "A woman can't rape a guy."gender neutral LOL trust me in Australia only a man can commit rape, although I suppose technically the law doesn't define it as a man but rather having a penis. Any case involving a woman committing what you may consider equivalent to rape is charged as Sexual Assault not rape ever it is just not possible under the word of the law and I doubt Australia is the only western country with this. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/12 05:36 AM |
| -7 | Saw this on some imageboard earlier, ticked me off a bit...I wouldn't use that 36 examples one, I am not the only one who gets tired of people talking about 'circumcision as an injustice against men' | /r/MensRights | 01/10/12 07:04 AM |
| 1 | At a charity event last night.well until someone gets shot | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 06:19 AM |
| 1 | "I did not consent."Those "myths bla bla bla on circumcision" are far less reputable than the dodgiest of medical reports supporting circumcision. The mere fact you are taking their word means you have bought into major parts of the debate against circumcision that are just plain wrong and demonstrate why people like you continue the argument and on ridiculous lines I might add too. There are plenty of cases of men suffering phycalogically due to the fact their penis is different (in regards to circumcision) and ha… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/12 12:16 PM |
| 6 | Men aren't walking penises?true and I agree with both of you (under law in a number of countries women can not actually commit rape by the way merely sexual assault, like Australia rape requires one to 'forcibley insert themselves into') I think the more important point from this poster is not rape, lets face facts rapes wrong no matter what, its more the idea that all men are driven by lustful emotions unable to control themselves, which lets face facts is wrong. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 03:15 PM |
| 1 | "I did not consent."actually ilovenotohio is right circumcision ditches the forskin which is sensitive however how sensitive different parts of the penis is varies man to man, generally however circumcised men last longer then uncircumcised men. now all of what I just said has nothing to do with your orgasm do you really think that your foreskin changes the eventuating orgasm affecting the brain and testes, loins etc. because if you do.................................................................................… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 12:01 PM |
| 0 | "I did not consent."the death thing is far far far less likely then the many decreases in death caused later by things circumcision reduces the chance of (such as penile cancer 1/3 less circumcised males suffer from penile cancer)(cicrcumcision related death is a case by case basis, if performed by anyone qualified this will not happen) any reduction in 'sexual aptitude' caused by for example cutting to much foreskin off, has the same cases as those who have issues due to elongated foreskins, (one gets essnetially … | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 11:46 AM |
| 1 | "I did not consent."Its basically the same as saying baby ear piercing is a women's rights issue | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 11:34 AM |
| 1 | "I did not consent."It's either better for everybody, or not necessary for everybody. This is your problem you are thinking in extremes and ignoring non medical factors. (While medical factors can play role (reduced risk of HIV HPV penile cancer etc. etc.) There are many other factors that should make up part of the decision. is the rest of the family circumcised? (there have been just as many cases of males not feeling belonging due to being uncircumcised unlike rest of family as the other way around) Aesthetics, … | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 08:50 AM |
| 8 | TIL in Ireland, teenagers can go to prison for having consensual sex. But only if they're male.a lot of places have it that women can't rape and its just sexual assault pretty sure Australia classifies rape with 'insertion' and women can't insert themselves into men so they can't rape them. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 05:16 AM |
| 1 | "I did not consent."Your parents have the authority to make certain decisions for you. Precisely they are not forced to choose circumcision In America (i am not btw) 75% circumcision rate and the medical council "preventive health benefits of elective circumcision of male newborns outweigh the risks of the procedure" 'in regards to the health benefits they' "are sufficient to justify access to this procedure for families choosing it and to warrant third-party payment for circumcision of male newborns," but "are not… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 03:19 AM |
| 1 | "I did not consent."you keep alluding as if it's forced it is not forced, just as your legal guardians do not have the authority to make certain decisions regarding your person at some ages they do at others its as simple as that. Personally I have a problem with forced taxes and the society that perpetuates it. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 11:42 AM |
| 0 | "I did not consent."what matters is the person who's BODY it involves. And those are the only people who actually do NOT decide if they want to be circumcised or not. You are at an age whereby these decisions are made on your behalf by your legal guardians (most likely parents), if you have a problem with this you have a problem with society not circumcision. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 04:54 AM |
| 0 | "I did not consent."everything you just said applies equally to being uncircumcised | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 04:43 AM |
| -12 | "I did not consent."Also something I failed to mention in my other comments is how does this have ANYTHING to do with men's rights. It is we men who came up with male circumcision and it is we men who make the decision as to its application and this is just excluding all the arguments I made in my other post as to why it is silly to even be against it as a decision for parents to make. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 01:48 PM |
| -14 | "I did not consent."You're analogy is so stupid it caused me to tear up at the lack of common-sense some people have. I know sex with a condom to be less pleasurable I am sure you do to, but do you hence never use a condom? Am I irresponsible using a condom? Getting immunisations generally makes you sick for a few days (depends from immune to immune) and plenty of people don't like needles, do we all walk around with immunisations? would a parent be irresponsible to give said children immunisations knowing fully we… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 12:40 PM |
| -17 | "I did not consent."... That's stupid male circumcision proven to have benefits in terms protection against STI's (mainly HIV yes), the idea that you can tell whether an uncircumcised male or circumcised male (as a baby) gains more sexual pleasure is purely speculation as adult circumcision does cause negative effects its a bit hard to compare. If you don't like being circumcised so much you can undergo a procedure to 'restore' the foreskin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreskin_restoration. Any 'evidence' in regard… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/12 10:17 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter