TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

adoptinglilkits Archive

View 0 posts and 6 comments by adoptinglilkits on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Not one citation of methodology by a researcher, as you've singled out in particular, using different criteria for the definition of homelessness based on gender for their study? It's one thing to be exagerating for effect and to say the exageration is not meant to be taken literally, i.e. you don't literally mean the definition for women is lack of wooden beams, but this seems like a groundless attack on academic research methodology.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:17 PM
2

You made a claim but haven't backed it up with any citations of researchers using different criteria for the definition of homelessness based on gender (especially relevant since you later claim this difference in definitions skews statistics). Methodology is readily available for every study out there, but when probed about it you just mention anecdotes about how you know women who self defined homelessness as X, Y, Z.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:21 AM
3

Do you have link to studies methodology to back up your claim that definitions of homelessness differ based on genitalia? This is especially pertinent since you bring up differing definitions of homelessness skew the statistics. What I'm saying is that homeless means literally without a place to live and there, men outnumber women by what I said I suspect is far more than 200%. But because society treats men and women differently, it counts all sorts of other living arrangements for women as hom…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:07 AM
2

There was more than just the three drunk people: However, a security firm employee working at the nightclub told the court that she had been in need of an ambulance. Gayle McGregor said: "She wasn't in control of herself. Her eyes were rolling in her head. She couldn't stand up straight. She couldn't speak to me properly. She wasn't compos mentis."
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:18 PM
1

Was he probing important facts which go to the heart of the issue relevant to Canadian rape laws, or was he probing for things that would satisfy his own (discredited) ideas about rape? Another user posted a great excerpt from the 100+ page findings from the committee.. He was looking for answers that would satisfy his own views, which are discredited in Canadian Courts.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 04:06 AM
3

He was unknowledgeable about Canadian rape laws. And he even referred to the alleged victim, the accuser, as "the accused" (that's a hard thing to justify). It seems to be the basics of being a judge to give impartial rulings, not be using defunct ideas about rape that are contrary to Canadian rape laws, and to be knowledgable.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 10:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter