TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aegorrivers Archive

View 69 posts and 401 comments by aegorrivers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6020

Marriage/Divorceaegorrivers/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:12 AM
447

aegorrivers/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:38 PM
403

Storyaegorrivers/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:01 PM
388

aegorrivers/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:11 PM
301

Discriminationaegorrivers/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:21 PM
229

aegorrivers/r/MensRights25/01/17 04:11 PM
217

Social Issuesaegorrivers/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:47 PM
214

Outrageaegorrivers/r/MensRights26/01/15 01:33 PM
113

aegorrivers/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:11 PM
88

aegorrivers/r/MensRights04/05/16 04:00 AM
83

aegorrivers/r/MensRights02/03/17 06:27 PM
63

Monsterousaegorrivers/r/MGTOW09/06/17 05:53 PM
62

aegorrivers/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:49 PM
61

aegorrivers/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:22 PM
61

aegorrivers/r/MensRights17/07/14 10:07 PM
59

aegorrivers/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:40 AM
41

aegorrivers/r/MensRights09/05/16 05:41 PM
38

aegorrivers/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:57 PM
37

aegorrivers/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:58 PM
35

Discussionaegorrivers/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:33 PM
31

Outrageaegorrivers/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:14 PM
28

Social Issuesaegorrivers/r/MensRights06/06/17 09:25 PM
25

aegorrivers/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:14 AM
23

aegorrivers/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:55 PM
22

aegorrivers/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:18 PM
20

aegorrivers/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:36 PM
18

Analysisaegorrivers/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:31 PM
15

aegorrivers/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:16 AM
15

aegorrivers/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:12 PM
15

aegorrivers/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:46 PM
15

Social Issuesaegorrivers/r/MensRights31/05/16 11:21 AM
14

Marriage/Childrenaegorrivers/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:27 PM
12

Fathers/Custodyaegorrivers/r/MensRights29/05/17 06:45 PM
12

Legal Rightsaegorrivers/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:00 AM
12

aegorrivers/r/MensRights08/12/14 01:25 AM
11

Generalaegorrivers/r/MensRights09/06/17 04:17 PM
11

aegorrivers/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:18 PM
10

aegorrivers/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:55 AM
10

aegorrivers/r/MensRights19/07/14 06:37 PM
9

aegorrivers/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:16 PM
7

aegorrivers/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:59 PM
7

aegorrivers/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:20 AM
6

Social Issuesaegorrivers/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:40 PM
5

aegorrivers/r/MensRights14/12/14 08:02 PM
5

Outrageaegorrivers/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:04 PM
5

Reverse Gendersaegorrivers/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:44 PM
5

aegorrivers/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:30 AM
4

aegorrivers/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:07 PM
4

aegorrivers/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:24 AM
4

aegorrivers/r/MensRights01/07/14 12:41 PM
4

aegorrivers/r/MensRights14/10/16 10:59 PM
3

Discriminationaegorrivers/r/MensRights14/01/15 10:51 PM
3

aegorrivers/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:09 PM
2

Anti-MRMaegorrivers/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:09 PM
2

aegorrivers/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:23 AM
1

aegorrivers/r/MensRights04/02/17 09:46 PM
1

aegorrivers/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:45 PM
1

aegorrivers/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:55 PM
1

Legal Rightsaegorrivers/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:23 PM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:19 PM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:14 PM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:25 PM
0

Discussionaegorrivers/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:41 PM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:25 AM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:23 PM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights10/07/14 04:24 PM
0

Storyaegorrivers/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:11 AM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:12 PM
0

aegorrivers/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
101

So blatant.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:45 PM
4

Seems like feminists seem to think that brown men are the real perpetrators of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:57 PM
-8

Also if a man gets cucked and the wife threatens to not feed her child unless he accepts it as his, is the man at fault if he says no?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:57 PM
-8

Oh really? So how much of your income did you donate to starving African children? Or better yet starving kids in the inner city?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:56 PM
-15

100% disagree. It was not his kid. Why should he play the cuck?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:50 PM
2

Since when is ignorance a defense in front of the law? Oh that's right, it's not when you're a male. My bad.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:39 PM
-1

It's because they're brainwashed cucks
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:12 PM
-3

This contest is literally what modern marriage is about. Man does all the work; woman has all the fun
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:10 PM
2

Ok, this is bullshit. I was bullied throughout elementary school, middle school, and high school, and I did well in all of my classes, including my English courses.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:09 PM
1

So they don't actually care about the kids; it's about the power and control and the money. Are girls actually even worth having around?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:14 AM
7

She is a liar and a crook, just like all Indian politicians. This is why Indians in the West despise these moronic governments in India
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:39 AM
1

Wow, they should get jail time for this. But of course they won't.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:37 AM
7

Wow, she said as if I were a male OR a threat, implying that men should be attacked even if they aren't a threat! She should get nothing!
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:36 AM
21

This keeps happening again and again and again. I'm sick of this shit
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:35 AM
10

She's also lying. She and her father threw a fit and said anybody who made fun of her weight was sexist. B/c it's only ok for women to be fat apparently
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:18 PM
1

Quite frankly the right thing for him to have done is to let the child wander around. It would have been better for him to have ignored the kid. If it gets kidnapped by a real predator, too bad. Why should I have my name smeared for a good deed? Forget it.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:02 PM
3

Your face is cancer. You just non alpha men to be slaves while females and alphas work them to death for their own personal enjoyment and luxurious lifestyle.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:10 PM
0

This is a website in one county of one state. Nice try. You can't generalize, especially given that paternity laws are different in different states. This usually only applies in cases in which the mother is not married to anybody. If the mother is married to someone, the husband gets fucked over. In any case the mother will marry some sex starved beta cuck and get a willing cuck who is raising another man's genes knowingly. I also consider stepfathers to be defrauded.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:49 AM
0

I never even found one. Could you please show me one?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:14 PM
0

Here's another one http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4117362/Oklahoma-man-forced-pay-child-support-s-kid-didn-t-girlfriend-cheating-time.html That happened this year. And quite frankly there are no stats on this, unfortunately. I've looked.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:53 PM
1

Sure thing. Here's just one example: http://mensrights.com/fighting-paternity-fraud-carnell-smith/ He had to fight for 11 fucking years. While the alpha got off scot free and probably impregnated 100 other women in that time. The idea is probably to not tie down alphas financially so that they can reproduce and inhibit betas financially so that they don't even have a chance
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:44 PM
0

"Go educate yourself; it's not my job to back up my assertions! I can say whatever I want without a shred of evidence and it's automatically true!"
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:08 PM
0

This is literally a feminist tactic.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:11 PM
1

:LOL, ok. Do you think there's a legal form the courts use with a check box that says "alpha" on it and they just throw it out or something? No, it's a cultural bias that has the laws set up such that the alpha plays and the beta pays. If this bias didn't exist, the cuck would be allowed to get off scott free while the alpha would be forced to pay for his own children. :If you honestly think that's true, you're living in a fantasy world. Can you provide a single instance in which this was not th…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:03 PM
0

I'm not projecting any jealousy. This is a fact. Alpha men get away with all sorts of things. How come the bio dad is NEVER held responsible and the cuck beta always is? Please explain.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:47 PM
3

Holy shit!!!!! I NEVER thought this would happen! We need to upvote the shit out of this!
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:41 PM
-1

Because it's true. People want alphas to get away with not paying for their babies. Like if a man is a beta, he's obligated to be a cuck apparently.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:38 PM
0

Alt righters are usually fat neckbeard virgins, sorry. MRA =/= alt right. There's definitely a strand of WN on MGTOW that I don't seem on the Men's Rights subreddit, so from now on I'm staying there.
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 08:37 PM
0

lol white men are demonized? Lmfao bro. CERTAIN white men (read: nerdy losers) have it hard, but I'm pretty sure that blacks who are cast EVEN BY PEOPLE LIKE YOU as criminals, rapists, etc. are the ones who are demonized. Criminals are hypersexualized in our society, so it's the fault of people like you that blacks (the people you are calling criminals) get hypersexualized and get pussy. You could combat this by not castigating them as criminals and instead adopt a thug persona for yourself.
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 08:34 PM
0

I'm definitely not black, sorry. I'm Asian lol.
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 08:32 PM
1

Learn how to read. I never said white men were undesirable. I said the undesirable ones get into relationships with black women. Go reread what I said, lol. You strawmanned my argument, and you are continuing to do so. You're claiming I lose by claiming credit for a point I made. I've never seen someone so incapable of winning that they had to do that lol.
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 08:31 PM
-1

Why is this world so HELL BENT on letting alphas get away scott free from their parental responsibilities?
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:30 PM
0

Take her to court and sue for gender discrimination. This is the ONLY way to deal with these issues
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:27 PM
0

I fail to see how this is relevant lol? I don't particularly care about the FST. The reason is that the definition of a species is "a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding". So by this definition, all humans are the same species. Regardless, even if you think that they are different species, it's quite frankly none of your business if people want to be in interracial relationships. You really don't have a right to make these deci…
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 04:18 PM
0

Do you even know what schizophrenia means?
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 04:16 PM
0

Nothing you posted here is responsive to anything I said, and it's also just plain dumb. While it's true that white men are the most desired men, that doesn't mean that all white men are desired. Some of them are silly, obese virgin losers who can't hold down a job or pass classes and consequently hide behind cartoon frogs. While others of the same race are more desirable, not everyone who is white is desirable. The undesirable white men get with the undesirable black women and stay in those rel…
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 04:14 PM
0

I'm not even black, lol. You've invented some nonsense about me being black, sir leech. Back to the trailer park where you can pretend to be superior because someone who has the same skin tone as you accomplished something in life beyond sleeping with his own sister.
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 04:11 PM
0

Under the modern definition, Irish is an ethnicity. 100 years ago, it was considered a race. You guys changed the definition because the Europeans didn't want you guys. They thought you were impure mongrels, and you know it.
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 04:10 PM
1

Leave this relationship immediately.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:43 PM
2

The IRA was committing terrorism even in this decade: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/former-provos-claim-kerr-murder-and-vow-more-attacks-15146426.html
/r/MensRights11/06/17 05:56 PM
0

I see, so it's wrong if white women sleep with a non white dude, but white men are free to have sex with whomever they please? Yeah, your white supremacy is totally not based on sexual inadequacy lmfao
/r/MGTOW11/06/17 05:51 PM
0

Your very first link is wrong. There are hundreds of different races. Irish is a different race than English which is a different race than Welsh. Our ancestors understood this. Europeans understand. It's only mongrel Americans who don't, am I right? /s You racists shifted the definition of race because under the old rules you were all undesirable mongrels lol.
/r/MGTOW11/06/17 05:44 PM
0

Literally makes no sense. Interracial babies had all the trailer trash incest bred out of them
/r/MGTOW11/06/17 05:43 PM
1

There are no levels lol. They're all not dateworthy
/r/MGTOW11/06/17 05:42 PM
0

Only to someone who literally is salty b/c a black dude fucked his crush and he never got anything lol. Makes no difference to me. I'm not raising the kid either way, so it's literally not my problem
/r/MGTOW11/06/17 05:41 PM
1

The reality is that they don't even consider beta men to be men. Only Chads are men. That's why they think 80% of men are below average in attractiveness. That's only possible if you don't think of ugly men as men and exclude them from the calculation.
/r/MGTOW11/06/17 02:45 PM
0

I'm not black either, lol, nice try. Typical white supremacist attitude. Nobody is jealous of your trailer lmfao. And even if you think certain white men are superior, unless you are personally one of the captains of industry or inventors, etc. you are nothing more than a common thief claiming superiority on the back of another man's achievements. White supremacists are, in my experience, nothing more than leeches claiming they are better because someone who happens to share their skin tone acco…
/r/MGTOW11/06/17 02:41 PM
1

I see, so inanimate objects are the same as children and pets and old people? So if a woman uses a vibrator, should she be considered a psychopath? Or is it just different for men and women b/c women are somehow superior?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:37 PM
-5

Lol the reality is that most people don't care if the baby is interracial. It's only inferior people who had their crushes stolen by a black dude who are worried about this
/r/MGTOW10/06/17 03:13 AM
1

You're assuming that people who aren't black have small dicks? I, for one, am not afraid of her wanting big dick lol. I'm just not willing to raise someone else's kid.
/r/MGTOW10/06/17 03:12 AM
25

Why cares lol? If it's white would you be a cuck and raise it?
/r/MGTOW09/06/17 06:05 PM
2

The reasons are this: Objectified men get power from women. Women want men that other women want. That's why there's a virginity double standard. Women don't want virgins and they hate when men ask about their number count. Why? Because they want partners with high counts and they think men should want the same thing. Women are the whole fucking reason double standards exist. If they don't like it, they could always change the damn standards!
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:25 PM
1

Basically she fucked some hawt dude in the office and decided to divorce him for that reason.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:14 PM
2

Feminist plants in them media are pushing for this. I'm fine with them not wanting a subservient role. They seem to think, however, that if they don't get to fuck whomever they please after they're married, their sexuality is being suppressed by the mean beta men whose back accounts they want to exploit. If you read the articles, they'll drone on and on about how there wasn't time. There's always time lol. They seem to find enough time to run around with lovers once the husband gives his consent…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:46 AM
1

Feminists are not against sex. You're talking about like first or second wave feminism. Third wave feminists love sex, but only if it's with an alpha. They think anybody who isn't an alpha having sex with a woman is an abomination. Third wave feminism is alpha sex positive
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:41 AM
1

The agenda is to normalize cuckoldry as the main relationship paradigm. They keep pushing for open relationships and explain how it fixes relationship problems. They even posed an article (and later a media interview +) about a "feminist" man who lets his wife fuck around. The agenda is to make normal men cucks so that the "fun" that single women have can continue after marriage.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 01:22 AM
1

Like is marriage just to provide the woman a slave while she sluts around? give me a break.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:19 AM
1

If the wife fucked someone else and tried to pass off his child as your child, she already ruined the family. It doesn't exist except in your mind. People have a slave mentality quite frankly. Why it's so hard to make alphas care for their own damn children instead of cuckolding innocent people is beyond me
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:19 AM
1

Why would I be on a white supremacist sub? I'm not even white lol. Thanks for the assumptions. I'm guessing you think that nonwhites like to be cucked? Well I can assure you that we don't. Media only cares b/c it's a cuckold case. They wouldn't bother otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:58 PM
1

I would dump her shitty ass and burn every penny I own to foil her cuckolding plot
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:57 PM
1

Muslims have a stupid cuck principle then. I would never ever accept a kid that wasn't mine. No girl is EVER going to cuck me
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:41 PM
1

No, I don't think it's ok to deny men access to his own children. This man should get to see his child. My issue is that the media is only discussing this story as a means of furthering their cuckold agenda.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:53 PM
3

Well according to a new branch of science called feminist biology (yes, it's actually a thing), women NEVER mature. That way they can NEVER be held responsible for anything!
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:09 PM
1

Downvoted by feminazis
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:14 AM
1

Good. :) Nobody is stealing the fruits of MY labor. When it's time for me to go, I'll convert all my wealth into gold and throw it into a volcano.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:14 AM
1

HOMEMAKER WAS HER CAREER. Blind as a bat, dumb as a frog
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:13 AM
1

Meaningless, made up statistic that you extempted from your butt. Given that the majority of marriages end in divorce, the likelihood that your marriage will be unhealthy is nonsensically high. Say goodbye to your assets and hello to paying for your wife's gangbangs
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:54 PM
1

I am. I don't want to be a paternity fraud victim lol. I'm more than grateful about that :)
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:53 PM
1

My 6000 upvoted post made it to r/all so the feminist brigade came and downvoted me. Nice try
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:52 PM
1

sigh. I have repeated this many times. Her own court case admitted that she was a homemaker and he worked "too much" on his business
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:18 PM
3

Ah, I see. I apologize.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:08 PM
1

You think she deserves no financial support because she provided no direct financial contributions to the marriage. Is that correct? Correct First, indirect financial contributions cannot be measured easily, but are still quite important. By staying home, his wife saved them untold amounts in child care, allowed him to work longer hours, etc. In fact, many couples are finding that it's cheaper in the earlier years for one parent to stay home as child care costs increase. But see, you ignored my …
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:57 PM
2

lol what? I have barely logged into this account in the last month. Delusional much? I haven't been banned anywhere except TwoX. You are clearly a fool lol.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:34 PM
2

I'm not trolling. You sent me to a communist subreddit in some random ass language. Click on the link. And you tried to convince me that I have a duty to chase after girls and sacrifice my self esteem to help the MRA cause. You're the troll.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:22 PM
1

Over 50% of marriages end in divorce. I think my "trust issues" are actually practicality
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:21 PM
2

and what attitude is that? Defending helpless people?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:21 PM
1

You're a sad person who tries to prey on people's insecurities instead of making a positive contribution to the world. Fortunately for me, I don't care about being a virgin. I'm quite comfortable with it nowadays, and thankful that I'm not exposed to the kind of insanity seen in this article. :)
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:20 PM
2

Because I'm an MRA, so obviously I haven't gotten over it? Grow up. I don't want my brothers (referring to all men as my brothers) to be taken for a ride and I don't want to have my future endeavors stymied unfairly because I am a male. I am a human being and so are the rest of the men on this planet. We deserve to be treated as such.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 07:34 PM
2

How is a communist reddit/seddit going to help me? I've been there and done that. I'm AnCap now. and lol, I love how you're calling me not picking up women "selfish". LMAO, that's amazing. I haven't done anything to make us look bad; I've given a voice to a man who was literally being told to go die so his wife good leech everything away. But you obviously don't care a lick about him because now the feminists are watching the thread and you have to look like a good lap dog
/r/MensRights27/03/17 07:33 PM
1

Because I've grown beyond those issues and they no longer phase me thanks to no fap :)
/r/MensRights27/03/17 07:23 PM
1

Even if I got married, I would put all of my finances in my own account. Not my responsibility to fork over all of my money to people who treat me with disdain like she is doing to that poor man.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:39 PM
2

Obvious response was obvious
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:36 PM
1

lol, I'm not going to reveal any more information, but I've accomplished quite enough more than that,and I'm very confident in that :) Go have sex. Even worms can do that. You're literally at the level of a worm.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:23 PM
1

If he didn't earn the money and she earned all of it while he sat around on his ass all day, I'd say the same about him. Or, at least the feminists would: http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2013-08-03/news/fl-alimony-reform-women-20130731_1_first-wives-first-alimony-reform-alimony-law
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:10 PM
0

The only thing you know how to do is crow about having sex. Congrats to you lol. That's all you'll ever accomplish in this life.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:56 PM
1

Whatever gets you off when you fap with your tiny . . . hands. Sad.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:24 PM
1

Yeah, he was doing the right thing. This guy is smart.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:23 PM
1

I spoke up for what I believe in. You're one of the fools who has no function in life except to criticize and berate anybody who tries to take a stand or build something. It's easy to be snarky when you are nothing and nobody
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:24 PM
1

online mafia games
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:30 PM
0

So because I'm an incel I'm supposed to be a cowering idiot? Of course you would think that. That's what you want to do: suppress all beta males. That's the point of all of this, isn't it?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:30 PM
1

in your mentally ill mind, maybe. My post got over 5700 upvotes and my voice was heard. A few braying donkeys here and there are meaningless
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:11 PM
1

Again, sour grapes. Sad.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:50 PM
1

What do you think divorce is?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:24 PM
1

I don't feel like going into this again and again. He earned every penny. What did she do for it? Nothing. but apparently she is entitled because she is a woman.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:09 PM
1

I didn't say either of those things; thanks for misinterpreting that not once, but twice, and then getting enraged about your own misunderstanding of what I said. I said that you should see a therapist instead of being married because you said your wife's role is to support you through tough times. That is what therapists do, and it's cheaper than marriage if you have a good insurance policy.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:37 PM
1

Sounds like you would benefit more from a therapist. Certainly would be cheaper. You didn't respond to the substance of my claim: "Additionally, you seem to be acting like anything she did didn't benefit her. I mean, apparently people need to be compensated for taking care of their own children, cooking meals for themselves, cleaning their own houses, etc. If that's the case, i demand compensation from the state for the pb sandwiches I ate yesterday as well as for making my bed this morning. "
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:04 PM
1

He was caring for her needs while they were married. You're acting like she didn't get free room and boards, free meals, etc. That's like saying if you quit your job, your employer should keep paying you until you find another one. Doesn't work that way. You are paid for your services, not as a charity. Additionally, you seem to be acting like anything she did didn't benefit her. I mean, apparently people need to be compensated for taking care of their own children, cooking meals for themselves,…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:05 PM
1

Yeah, they pretend to be feminists. Cowards.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:03 PM
1

I'm not saying that men are "motionally weak, short-sighted morons, prone to violence, and easily manipulated". I never said they didn't have culpability. I said the woman is culpable for what happened because she lied with the intent of getting him lynched. In your hypothetical scenario, the guy who lied about his ex girlfriend is not culpable unless he told the lie with the intent of having his friend torture his ex. Since she did lie for that reason, she is culpable. Whether or not she feels …
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:02 PM
2

I gave a valid source, and I didn't edit it lol. Wiki is also monitored to root out invalid edits. It's not my job to educate you. Believe what you want Idgaf lmao
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:57 AM
0

No, it's my way of saying "use your common sense" instead of being obtuse.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:56 AM
1

So my argument is invalid because I haven't had a relationship? Funny how feminism claims to advocate having people value themselves regardless of relationship status, but whenever you argue with a feminist, he/she/it is always first to use relationship status as a weapon. This is what a feminist looks like. Why should he have been less rich just for her? Beyond ridiculous. His life, his choice. Money is by far the most important thing on this planet.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:56 AM
1

? No I didn't. I mentioned cthulus.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:55 AM
0

I'm an embarrassment because I've never had a relationship? lol. This is what a feminist looks like.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:54 AM
1

Nope She should get her divorce but none of his money. Not a penny, not a sixpence
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:53 AM
1

That's not what it said. It said he did not support her career as a homemaker "in latter years". That means he supported it before but not later on after she did mean things like cheat. It says he was busy with the business and wasn't supporting her personal endeavors in the house because he skipped family functions.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:00 AM
1

So you're discounting her own evidence that she herself submitted on appeal regarding her role in the relationship?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:18 AM
1

It said she was a homemaker and he ran the business and worked overtime into family functions. That was her own complaint?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:17 AM
1

My problem with what you are saying here is that you seem to think I am forcing my views about relationships onto other people, and that's simply not the case. I personally think relationships that are based on inequitable contributions are bad and inferior to any other model, but I never said that should be forced onto anybody. Now, I personally will not have this issue as I am only attracted to girls who are ambitious, intelligent, and career oriented, and could not possibly fall in love with …
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:15 AM
1

Such a wonderous rebuttal has never been seen in the history of mankind
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:02 AM
1

If I didn't actually earn those assets, no. I'm man enough to earn my own way. I would expect her to be woman enough to earn her own way and not to divest me of my own income.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:21 AM
1

What do you think divorce is?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:20 AM
1

She admits she was a homemaker and that he was building up the business. I don't care what the feminist media had to say about the issue. Of course they would say if she made the bed the business expanded. They need to devalue the male contribution. Your article is an inferior source compared to the actual divorce appeal
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:19 AM
2

What a nonsensically heteronormative and cis-focused view of the world. Lesbian couples have two members that can bear children, trans men can bear children sometimes, and both gay and straight couples can adopt and have exactly the same childbearing burden that way (that is to say, none). Moreover, you're claiming that women deserve some kind of special treatment because they bear children. I disagree. Everyone should be treated exactly the same. That's what equality is. You haven't proven that…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:17 AM
1

My parents do make the same wage (and like I said, my mother would expect that I marry someone who makes the same wage that I do/has a job of the same caliber. That's how I was raised). When one of my parents lost their job and had to sit at home for a few months before finding another one, I don't think the home contributions changed much, but I wasn't really around since I'm in a different city, so I'm not sure. I personally do not think having one parent to stay at home to educate the childre…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:10 AM
1

I'm old enough to marry, though I'll admit that it's not common practice for someone my age to be married. It's harsh to expect both spouses to have an egalitarian, equally contributing part of the relationship? If I told you my parents had raised my sister to be a homemaker, you would condemn that as evil. Now I tell you that we were both raised in the same way to be equally ambitious and functioning members of society, and you rail against that as well. Basically regardless of what I do, I am …
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:59 AM
1

First of all, I'll say that I appreciate that you took the time to deal with me in a nice way instead of treating like crap the way many of the other posters did. I'll reciprocate the effort. It might just be the way I was raised, but my family environment was substantially more egalitarian than the average American's family environment. My sister and I were both expected from a young achieve to achieve academically and learn to sustain ourselves without relying on others. My mother and father b…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:55 AM
0

Society is already organized to their liking. Now they are just normalizing cuckoldry and paternity fraud so they can make other men pay for their offspring and be open about it instead of hiding it
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:22 AM
1

Which type of men benefit under feminism? Alphas. Who is at the top of society? Alphas. I think this question required 2 sentences to answer, not an entire conspiracy theory
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:01 AM
2

Yup, apparently this got onto r/all, so the feminist brigade came to disparage me for existing.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:58 AM
4

my mother worked, as did my grandmothers on both sides. My sister and I were both expected to learn how to care for ourselves, succeed academically, and never rely on a spouse for success. We were both educated on the importance of working and are both expected to work and provide for ourselves and our families. So yes, I hold that in high esteem especially since I am able to do that and sustain myself and also cook, eat out when I can't cook, clean my house, do my chores, etc. I don't need a ma…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:57 AM
2

Sigh. I don't have the time right now to educate myself on British common law. Here's what I'm saying: I don't have a problem with her seeking divorce. What I have a problem with is her malicious treatment of her husband. He worked his ass off to provide for her posh lifestyle. Then she turned around and cheated on him. I'm willing to bit my left hand that he was hurt by this. She then decides to separate from him. In response to that, he doesn't talk to her, probably because his feelings are hu…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:52 AM
3

If they hadn't had kids, he would have been able to have his job. Nice try :) It's not her business because she didn't do anything; in fact she complained when he worked "too much" to earn the money that she now covets
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:30 AM
2

agreed. That was all I was trying to say, and I'm being crucified for it.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:29 AM
1

I don't know what HP Lovecraft is, so you cherrypicked some odd things that have nothing to do with me
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:26 AM
7

I'm not saying it's worthless. I'm pointing out that you are pretending that she is an altruistic fairy princess, but in reality she was helping herself as well when she did these things. And while I do not support Trump, I'll point out that he is a billionaire and president so he did get very far in life. I wish I could achieve that level of success.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:24 AM
1

Of course not, and I never said that. I just thought it was amazing that she thinks she is entitled to a dime of his hard earned money considering that she has gone out of her way to ruin the marriage. She is mad that he won't talk to her, but she cheated on him and now is dragging him to court when he is old and weak and has separated from him. She seems to think he owes her affection but she did nothing but show him disdain.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:12 AM
2

She cheated in 2012 and separated in 2015 and filed for divorce in 2016. She didn't cheat after trying to get divorced. But keep hamstering and lying; it'll get you far in life.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:11 AM
3

So her cheating was justified? Wow. The lengths to which people go to justify bad female behavior
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:55 PM
1

She was racist and she lied to the men to get them to lynch Till. She even admitted it; it caused a huge outrage this year when that came out. The victim was Till, not the men who lynched him. But I see how it is; white women are obviously so superior to minority men (whom you see as animals), so you didn't even bother to think for a second that the victim was Till. and you can sit and pretend that you were saying that I think those murdering men were victims, but I'm a minority
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:53 PM
0

OMG I am sooooo unloved. My husband literally is the worst. This one time at band camp, he ignored me for a whole meal! Then he works all the time and skipped my parties because he was earning the money that I was using to fund said parties. I hate his work so much that I'm going to take away all of the fruits of his hard labor away from him. I didn't participate in the work, but I'll sure enjoy the results! Of course it's his fault that she cheated. It's always the man's fault. If a woman doesn…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:51 PM
2

Never married, thanks all Cthulhus, both existent and nonexistent. Assumptions make an ass out of you and you. Sad
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:48 PM
7

I see, so women get nothing out of sex, do they? Last time I checked, women and men were both supposed to enjoy sex because it was something they did together. And she deserves medals for raising her own genetic material/offspring, does she? That was a favor to him because I guess the children didn't belong to her, did they, he created them from dirt and then she took care of them out of the kindness of her graceful, noncheating heart, not to pass on her own genes. She cleaned up her own space a…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:46 PM
3

Never married. Thank all Cthulus for this, existent and non existent alike. She didn't do him a favor by "raising his kids."She was caring for her own children that she produced to pass on her own genes. I hate that people think that parents caring for their own children is a favor for the other parent. It's not. At best, it's caring for your children and doing the kids a favor; at worst it's caring for your genetic material. Those were HER CHILDREN TOO. She does not deserve money and medals for…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:43 PM
3

Did that contract include the things that she is trying to take his assets for, like not talking to her at a single specific meal in a restaurant? Getting pregnant, carrying to term, breastfeeding, etc. was not a favor owed to him. She was caring for her own children that she produced to pass on her own genes. I hate that people think that parents caring for their own children is a favor for the other parent. It's not. At best, it's caring for your children and doing the kids a favor; at worst i…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:37 PM
2

I don't need to lie, lol. I don't have tiny . . . hands unlike you. Sad
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:28 PM
2

Half of HIS stuff you mean. He earned all of it.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:26 PM
17

So she gets to steal the money that he was out earning while she sat on her ass all day? She should be grateful she got to steal as much as she did while they were together. I certainly would not have tolerated such laziness
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:49 PM
4

@all the fucktards who claimed she somehow contributed to the business: She contributed nothing to the business and was a homemaker. Here is the actual case for proof: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed176790
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:48 PM
1

She contributed nothing to the business and was a homemaker. Here is the actual case for proof: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed176790
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:47 PM
6

I have proof that you are 100000% dead wrong. She contributed nothing to the business and was a homemaker and complained that he worked too much . Here is the actual case for proof: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed176790
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:47 PM
38

She contributed nothing to the business and was a homemaker. Here is the actual case for proof: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed176790
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:45 PM
1

Why should he have to fork over his assets to her just because she realized that she was horrible to him? That sounds like a punishment, not a reward. She cheated on him and then dragged him to court on bogus charges, and her way of expressing how sorry she is for doing awful things to him is taking away his property. Wow, how compassionate and regretful
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:18 PM
1

I mean if you read the justifications she had for proof that he was mean, it was literally "he wouldn't talk to me that one time in the cafe when we had dinner". Not even lying or exaggerating. Meanwhile, she cheated on him, which apparently is totes cool
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:16 PM
1

Cuckoldresses cuckold their husbands. Read the wiki article
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:08 PM
2

You sound like a smug elitist with tiny . . .hands
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:08 PM
1

So the over 2000 people who liked my posts are lazy? How rude, you elitist
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:07 PM
2

Sour grapes. Sad.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:06 PM
1

This is so obtuse. She's already sleeping with other people and living by herself. Hmmm I wonder what part of the divorce she's lacking? (Hint: it's the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$)
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:06 PM
0

Source? She should work just like everyone else. She cheated on him; he has no duty to fork over his cash to sustain her long line of boyfriends
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:58 PM
1

Maybe he has his assets in a separate bank account. You're assuming it's a joint account. I personally would never put my assets in an account and give anybody else access to them.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:58 PM
1

With over 2000 upvotes, sounds like my voice was indeed heard :) I never said they were the same thing. I'm aware they are separated right now. She just wants his property and is gunning hard for it.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:56 PM
2

She cheated on him in 2012. That's documented in the Telegraph source. Now he's accepted that she's doing it, but he's refusing to pay for it. It's all he can do.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:55 PM
2

and you are a slavedriver who is getting mad because the cat is out of the bag. sad
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:50 PM
2

over 1800 upvotes and the top post on men's rights is not a fail. I am making a positive difference in the battle for gender equality for men
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:44 PM
1

You have been on reddit twice as long as I have and seem more active than I am in my account. And you say you would never brag, but you just did. You're pathetic and jealous and it's sad. I'm sorry you have tiny . . . . hands
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:38 PM
1

They're always forced! Didn't you know? Even the lady who screwed over Emmett Till was forced by the evil patriarchy to lie and get an innocent boy lynched!
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:32 PM
4

100% agree.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:31 PM
3

This is not a court of law. This is reddit. My level of evidence is adjusted accordingly
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:31 PM
2

I've gotten over 1700 votes on this post alone, in case you didn't notice. I'd say that's a lot of upvotes :) You probably have never even approached that level of reddit success. Sad.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:27 PM
3

My evidence is that gender roles of the time make it unlikely that she did the work.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:26 PM
1

Can you prove she contributed, or are you just playing the part of a cuck to white knight?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:16 PM
1

What else is a divorce for? I mean she's separated and sleeping with other dudes. The only thing left is money. You guys know I'm right. I am showing incredible restraint in the face of unrelenting stupidity, sheesh
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:45 PM
3

I think it's just becoming so normalized now because of the fetish that people have forgotten the roots of the term
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:43 PM
4

That's the media's spin. If she did nothing but sit on her butt, that would be called building it together according to the media because she is a woman and is not expected by society to contribute.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:13 PM
-1

Title is 100% correct. I'm sorry that I didn't put a spin on it. Could you please let me know what the proper, PC way of saying it was?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:11 PM
3

Yes it does. Definition of cuckold: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckold
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:11 PM
4

Do you really think she isn't going to get money out the divorce? You have a very illogical and obtuse mind. Especially since her arguments for feeling unloved are that he didn't talk to her during a meal in a cafe.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:09 PM
2

Mr Owens has so far claimed he has moved on and forgiven his wife for her "misguided" fling in 2012, saying he wants them to remain married as they "still have a few years of old age together". But Mrs Owens insists she feels "unloved, isolated and alone" and says her husband's behaviour amounts to grounds for divorce. Britain's top family judge Sir James Munby was told that the couple married in January 1978 but have been living apart since February 2015. During their time together they built u…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:49 PM
4

Mr Owens has so far claimed he has moved on and forgiven his wife for her "misguided" fling in 2012, saying he wants them to remain married as they "still have a few years of old age together". But Mrs Owens insists she feels "unloved, isolated and alone" and says her husband's behaviour amounts to grounds for divorce. Britain's top family judge Sir James Munby was told that the couple married in January 1978 but have been living apart since February 2015. During their time together they built u…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:49 PM
3

@ all of the people claiming she cheated after separation: blatant lies "Mr Owens has so far claimed he has moved on and forgiven his wife for her "misguided" fling in 2012, saying he wants them to remain married as they "still have a few years of old age together". But Mrs Owens insists she feels "unloved, isolated and alone" and says her husband's behaviour amounts to grounds for divorce. Britain's top family judge Sir James Munby was told that the couple married in January 1978 but have been …
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:48 PM
-1

lol k. You're just mad because your horrible hate movement got beat in court for once
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:43 PM
1

Standing up for a poor, emotionally abused, beleaguered man makes me a shitty guy?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:13 PM
6

Never had an ex, so you just lost your money
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:12 PM
1

Considering their ages, I doubt it
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:11 PM
1

That's fine, but he's not willing to lose his hard earned money because of her revelation of how she emotionally wrecked him. Why should he be further damaged because of her selfishness?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:11 PM
5

i'm not a nice guy, and that is a good thing. Nice guy=cuck
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:09 PM
0

Not wanting to be cuckolded =hating women? Man, the depths to which feminism has sunk
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:08 PM
8

She doesn't have a job. Read the article.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:04 PM
-15

Nope, I'm too smart to let a golddigger cuckold me
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:51 PM
2

I'm too ugly to be in a good relationship. It used to make me angry but I have started to accept that girls don't like me romantically, and I'm ok with it. I don't want to end up with a gold digger who cheats on me. Better to be single
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:50 PM
1

Feminist brigaders are doing that. I have over 600 likes on this post
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:42 PM
-11

What do you think divorce is?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:41 PM
3

My situation? I'm 23 and single and hope to stay that way.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:40 PM
13

The facts do prove it. She hates him. She cheated on him and is trying to divorce him to get his money. He is letting her separate and fuck whomever she pleases, but he will not agree to the divorce because he doesn't want to pay for her boyfriends with the money he sweated for. He also is not nice to her and does not talk to her because she cheats. She used her own affair as her evidence that the relationship isn't working. So she is trying to get rewarded for cuckolding him.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:40 PM
3

Yeah, you should try it some time
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:38 PM
5

I refuse to be a slave to someone who wants to cuckold me lol, so now I'm a bad guy?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:38 PM
4

5 years for him to not pay her for the pleasure of fucking other men, then. That is his right.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:28 PM
2

5 less years of alimony is as good as he is getting
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:21 PM
11

Apparently some people don't believe that he has money she is trying to steal. The man in question is a multimillionaire: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/14/millionaires-wife-refused-divorce-judge-rules-beratement-affair/
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:19 PM
2

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/14/millionaires-wife-refused-divorce-judge-rules-beratement-affair/ He is a multimillionaire
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:19 PM
-2

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/14/millionaires-wife-refused-divorce-judge-rules-beratement-affair/ The man is a multimillionaire
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:18 PM
20

He's a multimillionaire mushroom farmer: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/14/millionaires-wife-refused-divorce-judge-rules-beratement-affair/
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:18 PM
-7

The difference is that the code of ethics I am working with is superior to your silly thief mentality code of ethics
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:16 PM
3

Your brain is crazy lol. That's why you called yourself "derp beef"
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:13 PM
6

Men are not slaves. Stop treating us like dogs.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:11 PM
9

Waah. He isn't letting himself be turned into a slave. Waah. He is doing the noble thing. He is letting her fuck whomever she wants, but refusing to fork over his cash. His money, his choice.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:09 PM
-1

My point is she wants to fuck other people and steal from him at the same time.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:06 PM
-1

You didn't. She cheated and is now trying to steal and the media is bolstering her as victim-hero when she is the villain.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:54 PM
-23

Maybe she wants the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:53 PM
-31

If it's just about getting rid of him, she's already separated and sleeping with other dudes. Why does she need a divorce?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:30 PM
12

He's a mushroom farmer who has done well for himself and she wants a share even though she did nothing for it. She cheated because she hates him
/r/MensRights26/03/17 12:44 PM
5

You don't want the male pizza to grab the female pizza by the pussy.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:47 AM
1

You hit the nail on the head. And if one of them does eventually decide to use you because she has no other options, don't you dare question the fact that she is obviously sleeping with other men and making you take care of their children
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:30 AM
1

rule of genes lol. basically they want cuckoldry to be the norm. I would rather kill myself and burn everything I own to the ground
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:51 PM
1

Men do not owe your children or sex. You have shitty genes. Sorry, lawl.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:36 AM
2

This nonsense is real. I scored in the 99th percentile on my MCAT (on my first attempt) and graduated with a 3.93 GPA and Magna Cum Laude from an Ivy League school and did not get into any Ivies for med school. I'm Indian. Meanwhile, my friend who is a white girl scored in the 91st percentile on her third attempt (completely bombed the first two tries). I don't know her GPA, but she didn't even get Cum Laude so it must have been below a 3.7. Moreover, she graudated a year before me and took two …
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:56 PM
1

How this really changes anything, I'm not sure, but glad that you're on a powertrip.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 04:05 AM
4

"[–]teh_tg 25 points 9 hours ago In my book it's OK to shoot and kill him too, but do not make him suffer. Law enforcement may have other views so check with your local laws first please." And that type of comment shouldn't get 2X banned? Could you imagination what would happen if a guy said that he wanted to kill his wife for cucking him?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:53 PM
6

Women cucking their husbands is a pretty important part of a woman's experience since over 50% of women cheat on their husbands. I was trying to see how much support they would give her.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:51 PM
2

I even pointed out that feminists would expect the man to take care of his wife's bastard and of course I got banned lol.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:28 PM
6

Sorry, meant to also add that apparently it's the other man's fault and not her's.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:38 PM
6

Call the police. You are fortunate to have evidence (she admitted it to a friend). She is "moving out by the end of the month"? What if she kills you?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:31 AM
5

This is just dumb. Men can be ambitious without being married. I'm pretty ambitious and work very hard and I've never even dated anybody. Not everyone who is single is a Peter Pan. Stupid tradcons.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 05:36 PM
154

If a man did this he would be labeled a sex offender and barred from getting food or succor from anybody.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:20 PM
1

Except the problem is that arranged marriages aren't about compatibility of personality and interests. They're about marrying rich/talented people from "good families" with "similar values" (imposed by the families regardless of whether or not the young person believes in them).
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:20 AM
1

In those cultures you aren't allowed to divorce and as people get older they get isolated from everyone but their spouses. Not surprising.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 09:03 PM
15

LOL, so the feminist is hoping that the teacher faces domestic violence? More importantly, I love how she is telling a working woman that she has accepted a lower place in life when all she is doing is staying at home and baking vagina cookies in her spare time. I feel sad that this lady spread her genes into our gene pool.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:13 AM
5

It's not impossible. It's rare though, and usually they get snapped up by the most desriable men
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:32 AM
7

I don't know why girls think guys want stupid girls. Every girl I've been interested in since college has been intelligent and accomplished, and that was what drew me to them. I was never interested in dumb girls or girls who were accomplished in the same way that I was.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:48 PM
3

I'm sorry, why is "Assistant State Attorney Lauren Covitz" prosecuting this as battery instead of as sexual assault? If a male teacher did this to a developmentally delayed female teenager would society find it appropriate to just have a battery charge?
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:54 PM
18

This is female empowerment, obviously.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:51 PM
6

Stop speaking about gender studies and maybe we will. I have no interest in sitting in a crowd and being shamed when I can be doing something to improve my own life or at least do something enjoyable.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:50 PM
1

I love how feminists have to plant posts in order to claim that we are bad.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:35 PM
14

So they want to give women lighter sentences because of children? Interesting. Because if men go to prison they are automatically deemed unfit fathers. So why is that not true for women?
/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:42 PM
10

I'm neither white nor Christian so your argument is bs.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:40 PM
4

If this ever happened to me, I would destroy all of my property (every piece of it that I could not take) and flee this country. We are not government cuckold slaves
/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:13 PM
-3

She was just collecting benefits. Would she have started a relationship with a man who lost limbs?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:35 AM
1

I'm sure that he'll see raising "Ryan's" kids while his wife goes out and makes more as his feminist duty as well.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 09:40 PM
2

If a man had done this, you can bet your ass that he would have been jailed. Ridiculous beyond belief.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:13 PM
1

Since women love to objectify us, we should objectify them. I actually never had unreasonable standards for women until I realized that I was being held to unfair standards. Since then, I have made mine as unrealistic as possible.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 07:21 AM
4

So she decided to destroy his genetic future because he (a toddler) interrupted her bathroom break? She is the ideal feminist. That's the first thing they go for.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 08:04 PM
6

Don't use it. Send an email to the developer explaining that you are not using it because they are discriminating against men and that you have posted this information to several web forums so that others are aware of it as well.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:01 PM
-8

And stupid Malala gave a speech about this and talked about how she is sad about her brothers and sisters dying. Which one of her sisters died? They were all boys! Is she emasculating some of them?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 08:17 PM
1

Even the Hyperion tree (largest tree in the world) would look small if it were placed in the Grand Canyon.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 11:49 AM
5

I'm going to go do my laundry right now. When I come back, I expect the feminists to have sent me my paycheck for cleaning my own clothes.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 08:21 PM
18

They basically have 0 empathy for men at the bottom. They love to laugh and dance on their graves.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:54 PM
22

I noticed this too. They had no problem using this logic to claim men were idiots, but if you use the extension of this (that men are more likely to be smart), then there is a problem!
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:54 PM
-6

Says someone who probably supports violent criminals. I've never been over the speed limit, so I don't have any sympathy for anybody who has.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:13 PM
4

Isn't this the woman who sexually assaulted her sister by shoving marbles up her vagina and then defended it by claiming that she didn't actually do it, but that the one year old who probably had no clue what a vagina was did it?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:10 PM
-14

The penalty for any crime, including paternity fraud, should be death. I don't understand why we cater to criminals in this society.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:03 PM
16

LOL, so now they want to protect cuckoldresses by claiming that all men are cheaters? She's the one who was verbally abusing him and genetically abusing him via paternity fraud!
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:02 PM
5

Read some of the comments. You'll find subversive feminists trying to shame men by claiming that Western men don't care about this and take care of the child regardless. They are trying to shame Indian men into accepting cuckoldry with lies. Everyone, please post links to news stories about Western men who were devastated about paternity fraud to that website. We cannot allow the subversive feminists to alter the culture to support cuckoldry. They are trying to breed us out of existence.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 04:21 PM
3

Interesting that the Salvation Army workers come like sniveling dogs to men when they want money, but they won't be using that to help us when we are need! No sir! Well guess what? you can hop on four legs and three feet and howl at the moon. I still won't give you a dime, and this is the reason why.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:48 PM
1

This is actually a pretty common story for Indian American women. See, they don't like to date Indian men when they are in college because Indian men are seen as inferior nerds. Instead, they go around sleeping with other guys. Those other guys have no intention of marrying them, so they end up begging their parents to do a traditional arranged marriage when they feel pressure to settle down and have kids. Now, one of two things generally happens after this. Usually, most Indian guys don't want …
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:38 PM
1

LOL, she only thinks that they are sexist because she will never get one. They are sexist though, but not to women. They are sexist to men because they tell men that they need to spend three months salary on a piece of jewelry for a woman. A real woman would take a grass ring and be satisfied.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:57 PM
0

"pressures to engage in profuse sexual relationships which made it difficult to establish and maintain commitments" That's all this is about. They want to force alphas to settle down so that they don't have to settle for betas ever.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:44 PM
3

Everyone call the national organization and tell them that you will not donate a dime to them because of this misandrist policy. Their workers now stand outside stores dancing like buffoons. They can keep doing their buffoonery, because I will never give them anything again now that I know that if I ever needed help, they wouldn't give it. This world thinks that we are trash and that we should keep giving and giving and giving and get absolutely nothing in return.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:03 PM
1

You know what? I think it's wrong that the female officers are being denied the opportunity to be brave! Instead of having the male officers risk their lives by running into burning buildings and engaging suspects in shootouts, send the female officers instead. In the name of female equality, the male officers should be forced to have the inferior and cushy job that the females currently have. With equal pay, obviously.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 02:42 AM
10

This is definitely overdiagnosed. My elementary school teacher fought to put me on this, claiming that I would fail school if it didn't happen. Apparently to her, being a boy was a disease. My parents refused. I ended up going to the top schools in the country for my undergraduate education and ended up with above a 99th percentile on my graduate school entrance exam. Who knows if I could have done it if I had been drugged into a stupor like that harpie wanted.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 05:37 PM
2

So they are admitting that creepy just means "not hot"? Because if that's the case, 99% of girls I see are creepy.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:44 PM
1

Well, you don't believe the victim when the perp is a feminist woman, obviously. Dunham is the real victim here! She did it because of patriarchy! Obviously her sister is making a false accusation!
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:21 PM
3

Yes, they love sterilizing "inferior" men. They always have. They think it's a big joke when they wipe people out of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:21 PM
10

It's ok, they have a class for men on there too! They just called it "Gifted" instead of "Boys Only".
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:43 PM
1

LOL, you've decided in your head that I'm a tradcon and you're never going to budge on that belief. I don't care if they have consensual sex in prison. That's not my concern. My concern is when rapists are getting away with creating sex racketeering and sex slavery of vulnerable men in prison. As a weak, vulnerable man, I believe that is wrong. My type of man suffers enough in the outside world, and don't need to be raped in prison. I don't care if people have consensual sex, as long as it isn't…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:33 PM
1

If you had paid any attention at all, you'd see that I said that the condom was the signal that the prison staff was condoning the relationships. Instead of punishing rapists, they are giving them condoms to tell them that the coercive relationships are ok. So you've reached the same conclusion that I have, except you decided to pretend that you haven't by distorting my position again. I never said that condoms were the cause of the problem. I said that distributing condoms IN LIEU OF GIVING PUN…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:24 PM
1

"If a certain number of people are raping, and then those people keep raping, you haven't actually increased prison rape." You increase prison rape if they rape more people. The majority of rapes in general are committed by the same repeat offenders. "Prisoners who aren't already raping? But you said earlier that you weren't saying that." No, I said that I didn't say that they would do it to make the prison happy. That was some bs that you concocted. "All I'm doing is describing your idiotic pos…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:40 PM
1

According to a Human Rights Watch (HRW) 2001 report "No Escape: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons", sexual slavery is frequently posed as a consensual sexual relationship inside prisons. Rape victims are often intimidated into feigning consent to sexual activity, to the point of becoming "slaves" and the figurative property of their rapists. HRW also stated that many studies report the prevalence of rape perpetrated by dark-skinned prisoners against light-skinned prisoners.[1] Prospective slaveholders w…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:30 PM
1

I didn't say that either. It means that the prisoners who are already raping other prisoners will see that they are getting condoms instead of what they really need-punishments. So that tells them that the prison is condoning their behavior. It also means that other prisoners will start raping, not to make the prison happy, but to get sexual release while simultaneously creating their own status in the dominance hierarchy. You really have a talent for inventing delusional strawmen.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:27 PM
1

Nice strawman. What I'm saying is that giving them condoms instead of taking anti-rape measures tells them that the prison is encouraging their sexual activity and will thus increase the likelihood of prison rape.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:56 PM
2

Wow, so because he feels left out, everyone else should stop? Well there are a number of things that I feel left out of every day, not just in November, and you don't see me claiming that everyone else is privileged and demanding that everyone stop. And if I did complain, these people would call me bitter and whiny. So I don't know what the hell this nonsense is about.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:55 PM
1

Prisoners are not supposed to have sexual relationships, and the vast majority of prisoners are straight. The number of rapes occurring in prison to men is more than double the number of rapes occurring to women outside of prison. So yes, given that most sexual "relationships" in prison are coercive, I do think it will encourage them to rape more.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:45 PM
2

Wow, so instead of stopping prison rape, now they're giving out "free" (with our tax money) condoms to facilitate it! This is ridiculous. They are out to rape and murder as many of us as possible. How about these politicians pay for the rape from their own pocket instead of taking my money and getting a healthy cut?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 02:40 PM
4

How is expressing her opinion toxic behavior? More importantly why is it MY responsibility to take ownership for the behavior of OTHER PEOPLE? I have never once slut shamed anybody in my life, so explain to me why I'm responsible for other people engaging in slut shaming.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:21 AM
8

This was in the 1600s, and it wasn't satire. Women in that era were well known for advocating banning anything that meant that husbands would spend money on themselves rather than on their wives.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:35 PM
9

Their reasoning: it stops them from servicing us in bed! Waah. We women have "our rights" to sex from our husbands! But they don't have that right from us, obviously.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:58 PM
32

Also, she says that prisons are designed for men. LOL, what? No, they're designed for criminals, sorry.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:43 AM
62

LOL, so if women make up more victims of something, they're disproportionately affected by it. If women make up fewer victims of something, they're disproportionately affected by it. No matter what you do, women are the victims!
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:42 AM
4

Wow, she's being so rude to Sarkeesian and the other female game developers! He said ANY adult who plays video games is a "loser virg". So basically he's sexually shaming Sarkeesian and the other female video game players! That misogynist, right? Oh wait, he's a feminist, so his misogyny is ok, especially since he was really intending to be misandrist.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:53 PM
1

Yup!
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:58 AM
0

Durkheim Congratulations! You read the works of some doofus and now you're well educated. Well unfortunately, the scientific literature disagrees with Marxist bilge. So basically you read a fairy tale. That is not an education. I know exactly what I am talking about. Experiences alter your epigenome, which changes which genes are expressed, which changes how neurons fire, which changes your behavior. By definition, experiences cannot define you because you would not exist since everything you do…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:50 PM
0

Actually, you are your DNA. Education, intelligence, and experiences and tools that we use in order to keep our DNA alive. There is nothing inherently good about any of these things. Experiences don't define you. They are just impressions of your environment that your DNA uses to figure out how to react in given scenarios. That is why how you respond to things changes over time: your environment changes over time, and your DNA uses this information to change its reaction. I don't care if you don…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:21 PM
0

Yes, it is wrong to be expected to sacrifice your own genetic well being for the sake of others. It's also downright irrational to jeopardize your own genetic survival so that the genes of others can survive. So I don't think it's worthy of praise. The only reason you do is because you selfishly hope that someone does that for you. I praise "selfish: actions because I am the real selfless person and I don't want other people to be my slave or cuckold. You praise "selfless" actions because you ar…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:12 PM
3

We should eliminate all gender segregation in sports and chess. Men and women should be treated equally, and I don't see a reason to separate the two from each other. That's misogyny because it says that women are worse.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:02 PM
8

They asked him 5 times? So they were trying to badger him into consenting? I thought that if you ask multiple times, that doesn't count as consent? Oh, wait, it's a feminist who was doing the asking so there are double standards and anything she does is perfectly just.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:53 PM
0

So you think cuckoldry is nice? Are you a cuckold or is cuckoldry nice when you're the one who is cuckolding someone else?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:50 PM
21

Would one of our kind feminist troll friends please explain to me how 57 to 43 is equal? I suppose they'll say that women only count as part of men? Oh wait, I thought that feminists weren't misogynists.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:49 PM
-4

This actually makes sense, and I think the story outright promotes cuckoldry. Woman comes home with child from alpha male god and the foolish beta husband takes care of it. It becomes all powerful and rules the world. I wouldn't be surprised if this is what actually happened, and we are still worshiping cuckoldry to this day.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 03:47 PM
3

No. The gay couple willingly chose to adopt that child. If someone is victimized by paternity fraud, they chose to care for the child under false pretenses. The gay couple knew the child was not their child, and the victim of paternity fraud was not able to give proper consent.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 06:39 PM
6

This is your male privilege, people. You are so privileged to have the opportunity to have your resources taken from you so that the genes of others can benefit at the expense of your own genes. You should feel honored and blessed that you have the opportunity to pay for someone else's child and potentially have your own genes wiped form the gene pool. Absolutely disgusting. I would advise you to leave the country or destroy your property rather than pay a cent to these thieves and liars.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:18 PM
5

I posted this on TwoX and it got downvoted until they could hide it. They support this sort of nonsense. Not a single feminist in there supported the man; they all said that he deserved it. This experience has confirmed everything that I believed about feminists. They are nothing more than genocidal pigs.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:11 PM
-1

Posted it on Two X. I'm sure they'll just delete it. They love supporting this type of genocide.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:42 PM
1

You already have your hate on, as you're jumping for joy at this genocidal act.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:39 PM
-3

This is the tactic they use to make sure that you have no money to have your own children and start your own family. They are removing your genes from the gene pool by stripping you of your resources. It is nothing short of genocide. If it's in the child's best interests to steal, why don't they volunteer their own money? This is the height of ridiculousness. If I were in this situation, I would destroy all of my property rather than pay for my own destruction.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:38 PM
33

Biddle claims that this is a "joke". So saying that someone should be mentally degraded and broken down is a joke? Psychological torture is a joke? I don't know what sick world he lives in, because people commit suicide over the types of things that he finds funny. Feminism is a human rights movement, indeed. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights23/10/14 03:45 AM
5

This article doesn't actually prove that MRAs don't want to help male survivors unless they seem to think that talking about violent women harms male survivors. Her argument is one thing and her support is about something else entirely. Plus, she's blatantly wrong since AVFM does provide resources for male survivors of abuse.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:38 PM
11

You have no clue what you are talking about. The Common Application asks about disciplinary history and high schools are required to report it: http://www.nacacnet.org/events/2012/session-archives/Documents/2010%20Documents/D400.pdf I don't know where this moronic downvoting brigade is coming from, but don't comment on issues if you don't know anything about them. Did you ever even apply to college?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:07 PM
7

LOL, every college application asks whether or not you've been the subject of disciplinary action in your high school, and if you lie, you're finished. They ask your high school to report major things like suspensions>
/r/MensRights22/10/14 08:08 PM
8

They didn't just suspend him; they just ruined his life permanently. Do you think any college will take someone who was suspended for school for violence against women even if he didn't even touch her? His life has been destroyed. Another male life destroyed by this idiotic misandry. This is why we need male-only schools.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 07:55 PM
1

I was going to post this too! One rules for us and another set of rules for the alphas. Business as usual.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:59 PM
1

Traditionalism is still pro-gynocentrism, so I will never vote Republican ever again. I will only vote Libertarian.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:59 PM
6

LOL, and what harms come from being called a "douchebag"? Getting all of the affirmation from the other sex? Yup, these "douchebags" must feel terrible about themselves. Creep and virgin shaming is what you're looking for here.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:58 PM
2

Start sending boys to all boys private schools if you can afford them. Then this moronic bias won't exist anymore.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:27 AM
2

This is more ridiculous nonsense. I wonder if they've even talked to men before as friends. If so, they would know that we have body issues just as much as they do. Why do they think that so many teen and college boys go on paleo diets and spend more time in the weight room than in the classroom? Why do they think that teen boys freak out about their penis sizes? Why do they think that we scarf down disgusting whey protein or eat ridiculous numbers of calories that we literally cannot tolerate s…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 10:27 PM
2

I have a better idea. Why mollycoddle people at all? Let the stupid girls come in naked if they want to. They can get caught up in attention games with the stupid boys and get left behind while the intelligent boys and girls can focus on their schoolwork. In college, I've seen a number of girls dressed in what would violate high school dress codes and I honestly don't care. I focus on my work, and let the buffoons focus on sex 24/7. Survival of the fittest applies to grades for sure.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 05:29 PM
-3

The whole point is to make us infertile. It's all part of the betacide.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 07:28 PM
2

How do I know that you didn't just add that definition to urban dictionary and then come and report it here as progress?
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:45 PM
1

Why is it my obligation to pay for either their birth control or their childcare. The only reason that their birth control is less expensive in the first place is that the government is choosing to take away less from me for the birth control than for the other money. If they have sex, they better be paying for it themselves. This is literally the height of ridiculousness. Do you make homeless people pay for the housing of others? No? So why should I pay for the sex of others? LOL.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:20 AM
1

I use that line because it's been used against me by leftists many, many times in the context of looks and dating. So if it applies to looks and dating, why shouldn't it apply to other things as well? Eugenics is only supposed to work against hard working people? Not for them? In any case, I'm not espousing eugenics because I'm not advocating forcibly doing anything to anybody, whereas you want to forcibly take away the products of my work and give them to other people because their genes suck i…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 06:01 PM
0

Everyone starts out life with different advantages and disadvantages in accordance with their genes. Some people are born beautiful, and some are born ugly. Some people are born smart, and some are born stupid. Some people are born strong, and others are born weak. If some people are not cut out to do certain things because they have inferior genes, well, that's their problem. I used to be a Marxist and believe everything that you spouted too, until I realized that leftist ideas amount to eugeni…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 01:51 PM
1

Ugly people are not parasites. In fact, they're far more likely to contribute to society than you "angels" are. I don't understand why everyone hates ugly people for being ugly. Is that really their fault? Is it wrong to want the same attention that everyone else gets? Those stupid ugly people, always thinking about their emotions! It's like they think they're human. EWWWWW.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 01:40 PM
7

OMG! This is like totally not feminism. You just want women to die! Feminists hate the draft too, but it's like totally ok for men to be drafted and carted off to their deaths for two reasons: It's like totes the fault of the patriarchy! Men are drafting other men! Like, didn't you know that if one person commits a crime against another person, if that person shares the same gender as the victim, it's not a crime anymore? Duh. We like need to save all those women being oppressed by ISIS! How do …
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:54 PM
3

What about Libertarians? I don't support being a packhorse for anybody, regardless of party affiliation and ideology (traditonalist enslavement of men is just as bad as liberal enslavement of men)
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:58 PM
2

Men are currently facing a crisis of having their lives destroyed on a daily basis, so it's of utmost importance to vote along these lines.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:57 PM
3

Where did I say that men should be better than women? I said both should be equal and contribute equally to the family income.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:16 PM
1

Like, I'm seeing the parallels between traditionalism and leftism quite well. Both sides want to force people to do things in order to make life better for themselves. If your family cannot handle two people working, then don't have two people working. I don't see why I should have my lifestyle choices altered, however, just because that means that your family cannot compete. Leftists want the same thing.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:14 PM
1

My family could have afforded to live on a single income, but my parents both chose to work, and our family income doubled, which afforded all of the children excellent educational opportunities. In terms of which college I attended, I'm much better off than many of my peers. I would not have had it any other way Why? Because 1. I was forced to learn how to do basic things like laundry and cook, which does wonders in college and saves money 2. I learned how to manage my siblings because I babysa…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:12 PM
-5

LOL, so do you really want to be back to the age where you're paying for a lazy, overgrown child to sit at home all day and most likely cheat on you? I'm not a packhorse, a donkey, or a slave. Women need to work just like men do.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:41 PM
2

GMP failed because it's full of feminist shills like Hugo who actually advocated cuckoldry and laughed about how they got away with paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:07 AM
3

You're wrong here. Women objectify men for their looks much more than men objectify women for their looks. It's absolutely revolting.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:21 AM
-1

This shows why it is absolutely critical for men to pursue STEM degrees and developing cloning and artificial gestation. They're already removed 60% of all men in history from the gene pool, and they'll destroy us entirely unless we can liberate ourselves from them. We MUST stop doing research that benefits them and focus on ourselves. Put down the xbox controller and work on STEM!
/r/MensRights15/10/14 09:39 PM
0

This isn't propaganda and I don't care if the Cold War is over. Stealing from hardworking people to redistribute to our overlords is slavery. Because it's leftist slavery, it's called communism. I'm using factual terms.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:29 PM
-1

LOL give me a break. Less than 40% of men have ever contributed to the gene pool. I don't see why the majority of men, who won't even reproduce, should spend their lives supporting those with a significant reproductive advantage (women). This stupid communist slavery needs to go.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:29 PM
1

It's about MGTOW.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 12:26 AM
1

This has nothing to do with traditionalism.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 12:25 AM
1

Indian mobs are notorious for slaughtering innocent people. Just look at what they did to Sikhs in 1984.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 05:38 PM
-3

Alphas support feminism, so the world won't split between men and women along those lines.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 07:02 PM
-4

I don't really care about thugs and their thuglets. Explain to me why I should spend my money bettering them. How about they give me their money?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 06:42 PM
-5

It has to do with my right to not pay for someone to someday murder me. I have a right to my money and the thugs shouldn't be able to touch it.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 04:50 PM
1

I don't think you know what you are talking about. Ugly guys don't get dates. They fall predators to gold digging cuckolders.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 04:28 AM
1

I don't know if that fits the logic of the leftist movements. Apparently not giving people free food is oppression because then they die. If that's the case, why isn't genetic extinction a form of oppression? Moreover, it's not just that ugly men can't get women, but rather that ugly men are basically treated like scum. Incels are more likely to be educated than regular people, but actually have worse jobs and die earlier. Ugly men have a harder time making friends because people are naturally r…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:21 PM
11

Ugliness disproportionately has negative impacts on men. It's kind of like how the drug war disproportionately impacts African Americans. Theoretically it's not a race issue but in reality it has become one.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:53 PM
-2

Of course. They want to beat men into submission and then cuckold them. It's always been the standard plan of governments and other criminal alpha organizations.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:07 PM
20

I hate abusive scum like you.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:01 PM
1

He's basically a moron, but he is gaining influence because of his "We Hunted the Mammoth" blog, in which he mocks this subreddit and AVFM. The problem is that he's becoming influential because whenever a media source wants to write about the MRM they ask him. It's suspected that he's behind the hit pieces that were done on AVFM's conference because all of the outlets that did negative coverage had the same talking points from We Hunted the Mammoth in exactly the same order.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:24 PM
18

Defending yourself from criminal and violent behavior is not about "being a man". It's about defending yourself from criminal and violent behavior. I'm sorry, but as a victim of female-on-male domestic violence (both physical and emotional) and not being allowed to respond in any form without being punished, I don't give a rat's ass about who is stronger and weaker. They should think about that before attacking me. I have never initiated any physical confrontation against anybody else, but you c…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:00 PM
0

They want the connections.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:57 PM
6

I honestly don't care about frats. Most of the people in frats are rude and obnoxious anyways. However, I think it's ridiculous that they're banning male spaces by saying that men in male spaces are criminal. This is literally the tactic that was used in the Old South to say that African Americans were criminals and needed white people to monitor them to make sure they wouldn't commit crimes.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:55 PM
39

So basically Futrelle is allowed to slander and libel as he pleases? I wonder if he realizes that many people can also say that they think that David Futrelle is a rapist and a murderer and a Nazi.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 06:53 PM
2

It's blatant feminist hypocrisy because she's saying that patriarchal gender roles that men impose on themselves are what stop men from not being stereotypically masculine, but really the problem is that women don't like men who aren't stereotypically masculine. She doesn't like non-masculine men, and neither do most women. She's basically just saying nonsense in hopes of throwing people out of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:50 AM
-4

I'm not surprised that she wore a white outfit to match the 100th Anniversary of the murderous feminazi campaigns.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:08 AM
2

Nevermore! What have women done for me ever that I owe them anything? I refuse to sacrifice myself and potentially put myself in danger for them.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:08 AM
0

I love when big government shills conveniently become libertarian when it suits their agenda to support misandry and other sorts of filth. This is a man who takes taxpayer dollars and hands it out for free to noncitizens for college funds, who has increased taxes, who supported Obamacare and all other sorts of regulations. And NOW he decides to become a libertarian? What a typical feminist.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:59 PM
10

So when women now complain that men don't have any motivation and want to just play video games all day, what they're really saying is "It's not fair that I don't have somebody to steal from! Man up! My bad boy thug and I need money for the children!"
/r/MensRights20/09/14 12:41 PM
1

I can help. Please take the following assessment: Do you look like a male model (taller than 6 feet, no male patterned baldness, rock hard abs, bulging biceps, etc.)? Are you a criminal (do you have some jail time on your resume)? Are you the son of a famous politician or the heir to a vast fortune? If you said yes to any of these things, then it would be fine for you to complement her without getting expelled. If not, do not endanger yourself. You will get castrated and thrown from the top of t…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:59 PM
0

It's a well known fact that in this society, getting 12 years of jail on your resume will do more wonders for you than getting 12 years of school to become a doctor in terms of romance.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:00 PM
1

It might be worth sending the files to the opposition.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:00 PM
5

It's not time to celebrate just yet because these people play a long-term game. They lost in the election, but they will continue to indoctrinate young people, especially in schools. As Alastor Moody told us, constant vigilance is of utmost importance. Men need to start going into education and countering feminist propaganda and lies. Men need to spend more time with children to stop them from being indoctrinated and from hating themselves.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:56 PM
3

As feminists love to tell young men, "the world doesn't owe you a thing." If you don't like your market options, that isn't my fault; I'm not obligated to make things for you. I can make them for whomever I wish. If you don't like it, feel free to make your own technology. :)
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:51 AM
2

No, you don't understand! It only counts as marriage if wimmin marry hot guys! If they marry an ugly guy, society is being misogynist for not giving them better partners!
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:50 PM
28

They didn't just tell the gay man that they hope he is raped and killed. They actually threatened to rape and kill him. They're always claiming that MRAs are sending them rape and death threats but they have never even published a single threat. This video pretty clearly shows that the feminists themselves are sending out the rape and death threats.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:31 PM
19

"I’ve watched men spend an entire night talking to a girl, yet never get up the nerve to ask for her number." LOL, so I'm not allowed to even talk to girls now unless I'm interested in sleeping with them?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:49 PM
16

When I read this article, I thought this was satire because literally 100% of what she was complaining about is exactly how women behave towards men in the dating scene.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:48 PM
1

I mean, I get why people think that she's not a good person, but it's difficult to empathize with people who are so different from you unless you step into their shoes.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:55 AM
2

Life works in feedback loops. The more of something that someone has, the more of that thing and related things he's going to get. The men who got women first will always keep getting women in part because they become good with women first and also in part because women like guys whom other women like. I hate when people tell you to be more confident. It's utter stupidity. Confidence is 100% contextual and is based on prior success. For example, I recently took my MCAT, and during the exam was n…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:48 AM
2

I try to avoid conversations about MRA stuff in public because it's just not socially acceptable yet and I don't want to commit social suicide. I know that's cowardly, but that's the way it is. Sometimes I'll say something to make them think about what they are saying, but I won't push the point much.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:07 AM
14

So basically if a woman is a violent psychopath, it's the fault of the patriarchy and they shouldn't be punished? This patriarchy rhethoric is starting to become the height of ludicrousness.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:02 AM
0

What exactly are they missing out on? Being beaten 900 times a year? Being subjected to verbal, physical, and mental abuse (as women are far more likely to abuse their children than men are). If they're boys, will they miss out on their valuable lessons on how they are patriarchal oppressors?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 03:29 AM
2

You still have to have an incredible lack of empathy to think that caring about your own genes is sociopathic. These women will never have to face that, so that's why they don't care. It's just like rich/upper middle class people telling poor people that money doesn't really matter. These things don't matter if it's a guarantee that you won't have to think about it. However, you can still have empathy for others even if you won't experience the problem. I will never experience forced pregnancy b…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 03:23 AM
0

MRA isn't just about anti-feminism. It's about anti-gynocentrism. From what the protestors are saying ("women get all the privileges") it sounds like a healthy dose of MRA is needed to liberate men. Plus, I know for a fact that men are legally obligated to pay for their parents (as enforced in courts of law), but women are not obligated to do so. That sounds like sex discrimination and gynocentrism to me. I'm not against men helping out their parents, but I think women should be accountable for …
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:48 AM
-1

Plus, this isn't the only benefit of choosing my plan. With this plan, I'll have the pick of the litter in terms of attractiveness and intelligence. Given that I'm not attracting anybody right now, it's likely that I'll only attract gold diggers and lazy, unattractive single mothers, who are the bottom of the barrel in terms of both. Even if they did reproduce with me, my children would be of such low genetic quality that the entire enterprise would be a waste.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:43 AM
-2

The chance that you'll marry a woman who admits that she would commit paternity fraud given the opportunity is literally the same as a coinflip flipping heads: http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/96-of-women-are-liars-honest-1-565123 It's probably even higher since I bet a lot of women didn't admit that they would do that even though they would.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:42 AM
-1

Most single-parent households fail because of lack of resources. My plan is to become financially stable and provide a good household for my child. I won't be relying on the government or on petty thievery of the mother to support the child. I very explicitly said that I would be pursuing a high paying career in order to support this. Is this the ideal path? No, but given the current state of affairs in Western society, I have no other choice. The alternatives are to accept being cuckolded/raisi…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:39 AM
0

Yeah, I suppose it makes sense that the number is too high if the tests are of people who are seeking paternity tests. It still makes me incredibly angry that women (even if they don't get the chance to do it) think that this is ok though. I mean, you have to have an incredible amount of callousness and hatred towards your partner to think that it's ok to betray him in such an incredibly hurtful manner. It makes me think that at least 50% of women are sociopaths.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:33 AM
2

Also, I love how you've turned CPS into an ideological weapon. If you don't support feminism or liberalism, you obviously are unfit to be a parent and your kids should be taken away and/or killed and sexually abused by CPS:
/r/MensRights19/07/14 10:31 PM
1

50% of women admit that given the opportunity, they would commit paternity fraud: http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/96-of-women-are-liars-honest-1-565123
/r/MensRights19/07/14 10:21 PM
2

"A high level of social skills is needed to effectively raise children." Yes, a certain kind of social skills are needed, but those don't include romantic ability. Romantic ability is not correlated with good parenting. If that were the case, the best fathers would be the alpha male thugs that women like to have children with that they then pin on normal men. Unfortunately, the reason that women end up committing paternity fraud in the first place is because they are aware that the thugs are dea…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 10:20 PM
3

How can you be choosy about that? How am I supposed to know ahead of time if someone is going to cuckold me? Do you think victims voluntarily sign up to be cuckolded?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:56 PM
1

That's if you do this in the United States. There's a clinic in India that does this for about $4000. As the demand increases, the price will fall as well because there will be more people interested in making a profit off of this and they'll compete with each other for customers. Also, if you're concerned about costs, make sure that you get into a high-paying career. You're right though, it probably won't work for anybody except people who specifically become rich so that they can do this.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:52 PM
0

Her problem is that her gatekeeper role could crumble if enough people use this strategy.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:41 PM
0

I don't think you're proving that ability to interact with women has anything to do with interacting with children unless you're claiming that women are "often irrational, poorly communicating, constantly needy, extremely high maintenance". In which case, you're sexist and I don't agree with you.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:35 PM
5

You're assuming that I can't deal with women just because they aren't attracted to me. Actually, the majority of my friends are girls, and I get along much better with girls than I do with guys. Romantic ability has nothing to do with parental ability as you aren't going to be romantically attracted to your child. You need to be able to interact with them as a friend and as an adviser. So your litmus test for my capability as a parent should fly out the window right here. You're assuming that I'…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:27 PM
0

The thing that people don't realize is that it's the radicals who have all the power. They're the ones banning paternity tests in European countries so that they can get away with paternity fraud. They're the ones creating Duluth models. They're the ones lying about the data to such a degree that the authors of the studies that they cite are calling them out on it and saying that they are lying about the data. They are influencing the policies and enslaving men. We MUST stop them.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:07 AM
1

This was her ploy to get an upper hand in divorce court (they were getting divorce). First she lied and told police that the husband was hiding drugs in his toolbox, except those conveniently disappeared after she covertly called the police and they came to check. Then she didn't know what to do, so she got him arrested for cutting a watermelon 'passive-aggressively'. This woman is evil and stories like this are why I am starting to become thankful that I'm unattractive and haven't been in a rel…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:13 AM
2

Asserting male privilege=oppressing women according to feminists.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:10 AM
2

Dean Esmay isn't oppressing anybody, lmao, and in any case that's a red herring. You can oppress people in multiple ways at the same time. She specifically claimed that this (not dressing up) was one of those ways.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:08 AM
0

I don't see why it can't include "father" or "dad".
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:07 AM
1

The complaint was that Dean Esmay is oppressing women by not dressing nicely. She literally decided to make his choice of clothing all about her.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:06 AM
-1

I don't see why that necessitates removing "father" from the book. Straight men don't give birth either. Does only the birth parent matter?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:24 AM
0

This is actually incredibly homophobic. They are claiming that gay men cannot be fathers!
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:05 PM
2

Until I saw this, I honestly didn't believe that all they knew how to do was make everything all about them. Now I believe that.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:43 PM
-2

"The logic behind those is entirely different. The first conflates the idea that support for humanism and equality with the idea that a particular movement is the one and only right way to achieve those goals. The second sets real-world and objectively measurable standards for classification." The logic behind those is entirely the same. "Feminist" is an identity-a declaration that one adheres to the tenets of feminism. They are establishing an "objectively measurable" litmus test for belonging …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:23 AM
1

Why claim that people who agree have been duped or are stupid for believing certain philosophies? It's not right to claim women who support Men's rights are fools nor is it the other way round. There are women on here who do believe in supporting men and there are trans people who believe feminism is about equality. That's a silly point to have because it isn't logical. Saying someone has been duped is just a quick way to discredit anything they say and allows you to ignore them. It's more of a …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:21 AM
0

I don't see these women claiming they are TERFs. These women are feminists in the womens' studies departments. They have more power and are more representative of feminism than the college and high school girl feminists who support transgender rights. I would rather claim that the movement holds the beliefs of its leaders than of its schocktroops. Even the feminists who claim to not be transphobic use the transphobic logic of identity politics that I discussed, thus showing their real motivation…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 10:58 AM
1

Do you know what else is a privilege? Having society teach everyone that your self esteem has to be built up while boys' self esteem has to be torn down. When I was younger, I weighed 10 lbs. less than my sister did (she was two years younger), and my parents accused me, in front of my entire family, of being anorexic (even though I had a normal BMI and she was overweight). Now that I'm overweight as a result of developing a binge eating habit from these comments, I get a constant stream of jibe…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 02:06 AM
2

Yeah, this guy is a troll. I'll believe that men have all the rights when women have court orders against them forcing them to pay child support for the offspring that their cheating husbands produced with more attractive women, just like men have to do in paternity fraud cases.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 01:18 AM
1

You're assuming that men spend more money on dates because women make less instead of because women hold all of the cards when it comes to sexual power and use that to their advantage. Unmarried, childless women in our generation make 8%-17% more than men do (Source: http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html) and yet they're not paying for dates. We're still paying for them. Additionally, more women graduate from high school, college, and graduate school than men, mean…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 01:15 AM
0

Yeah, except your genes literally don't do anything for the advancement of the human race. They literally have the functionality of a virus since viruses get to reproduce by hijacking the cellular machinery of organisms that work to survive. Sure, they survive and reproduce a lot, but they don't contribute to anything other than themselves and they aren't useful for the species. There's nothing good about your genes other than the fact that other people want them for some unspecified, primitive …
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:32 PM
1

I somehow (not quite sure how) stumbled on this article one day: http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/6391918/whos-the-daddy/ I was horrified that people actually did this and that they got away with it because the law supported them. I brought it up to some friends who were also male feminists and to my surprise, they actually had no problem with it! One guy even said that women should be able to pick anybody, even if it was someone they hadn't even laid eyes on, to be the "father" (financially,…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:58 AM
2

Also, I can't provide documentation of this because it was a verbal conversation, but when I tried to explain MGTOW to some of my male feminist friends, they started laughing and called it a movement for guys who can't get girlfriends.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:38 PM
10

David FATrelle on Manboobz says that MRAs are MRAs because they are sexually frustrated.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:32 PM
1

Boycott this tournament. Women don't want to be excluded from the male-only event while simultaneously having a female-only event? Fine. They can have two female-only events and men can stop playing that moronic company's video game. Enjoy the bankruptcy!
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:06 AM
12

I actually looked this "study" up. It isn't a study at all. It's just a Feminazi opinion piece that the Pediatrics journal published. There was literally no study and no experiment. It was just a one-sided article about cuckolding men.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:00 AM
2

You forgot to include paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:47 AM
-3

You're equating my ideology, libertarianism, with a form of misogyny. I'm pretty sure you're just a feminist in disguise. At the very least, you're some sort of weird Marxist.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:15 AM
0

I wasn't talking about "me" specifically. I was using it in general terms. And actually, Hobby Lobby will pass on the costs to me (do you really think they're just going to give up millions of dollars to pay for someone else's contraception? No, they'll pass it on to the consumers). So it is my money. And you might say that I'm choosing to buy there. That's right. I personally will not buy at any store with price increases as a result of this contraceptive coverage that I don't support mandating…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:13 AM
1

This has nothing to do with sexual freedom. You are free to purchase your own contraception-that is sexual freedom. You are not free to take away my money to pay for your contraception. That is slavery.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:53 PM
-4

Ah, a feminist in disguise! Everyone who disagrees with you is a misogynist, yes? This has nothing to do with women or misogyny. I don't care if they give out free food to every homeless man in the universe. The company has no obligation to pay for your sex life or for the sex life of any other man or woman. Pay for your own sex life. Leave me out of it.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:51 PM
-1

You don't get to choose what compensation you get. The company offers the compensation. If you like it, take the job. If you don't like it, don't take the job. you don't have the right to tell the company that they owe you whatever pops into your head as the next big entitlement.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:47 PM
5

Why is this bill gender-languaged? The women don't have to get affirmative consent from the men?
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:59 AM
2

The MRM doesn't claim to speak for all men or to lead all men.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:43 PM
1

Yeah, as a racial minority I especially dislike the attempts to appropriate our struggles for their own twisted purposes. It irritates me especially because a majority of the people who have belittled me for my race, religion, and external appearance were white women.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:42 PM
0

Women are let off the hook all the time even when there is evidence. Plenty of studies have shown this. Women receive lesser sentences for the same crime. This is all over this subreddit. Nice try. My reasoning is in line with the logic and empirical evidence.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:09 PM
0

How many women are convicted without forensic evidence? He was convicted because he was a man and because he was a Muslim.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:40 PM
1

There was no forensic evidence. Being in a failed marriage is not a criminal act.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:26 PM
1

Here's the thing: I feel like we spend a lot of time discussing these issues and condemning society for these problems but really do nothing to support each other. Iin reality, that's what a lot of us need: a support network. I feel alone and left out almost every day. Even in my "friend" circles I feel like an outsider, but nothing I do seems to change that. I'm always the one running after them until they need me to do a favor for them, but I'm never invited to anything. I understand we won't …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:46 PM
1

TLDR: :How dare ugly men talk to me? They don't have the right! I shouldn't have to chase them away; they shouldn't even have the guts to try! The only thing they're good for is paying for my 'free' contraception!" What she doesn't realize is that the only reason that she has any power of this sort at all is precisely because men gave her attention. How they howl in Japan now because 1/3 of men in our generation ignore them. Their power vanished.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:29 PM
11

Their real reason is that they were teaching him his place. He was treated like a criminal so that he associates standing up for himself with criminal behavior. They don't want the poor little beta to defend himself when the alpha thug bullies come and attack him as an adult. He's supposed to work hard and give everything to them without complaint.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:05 PM
6

It's not binary. There are other types of men (like omega) and there are different types of alphas (alpha plus and alpha minus).
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:42 PM
1

Hard truths cut both ways.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:29 PM
2

Reproduction is biological success, not marriage. Marriage is increasingly becoming a sham method of extracting resources from betas. Beta bucks.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter