| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gold Digging DeniedIf you think that's what's happening here, you're one of the incels I'm talking about | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/04/23 04:32 PM |
| -5 | Gold Digging DeniedGod this sub is garbage now. All the incels from banned subs came flooding in | /r/PussyPassDenied | 14/04/23 06:59 PM |
| 1 | Roses are red, violets are blue, hah no money for you!If you want to be pedantic, then yes, you can't say that it was raining at the time and he's afraid of thunder, or he was too nice to have committed the crime, so that's a doubt or something along those lines. Of course I meant a legitimate cause of doubt. Again though, a lack of evidence IS reasonable doubt. If there is any logical doubt that he was guilty, then the verdict should have reflected this | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/02/22 05:21 PM |
| 1 | Roses are red, violets are blue, hah no money for you!Good thing I never said "innocent" in my original comment The stand is reasonable doubt, not any doubt I highly suggest that you look up what "beyond a reasonable doubt" is, because you seem to be mistaken. Reasonable doubt is the highest burden of proof, as in if there's any reasonable doubt about their guilt, they should be found not guilty. The complete absence of evidence is reasonable doubt that he didn't do it, and so he was imprisoned wrongly | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/02/22 05:14 PM |
| 1 | Roses are red, violets are blue, hah no money for you!There's no such thing as an innocent verdict. The 2 common choices are guilty and not guilty. Lacking any evidence that he committed the crime should have meant he was not guilty. If there is any room for doubt at all, then the verdict should be not guilty. This is the first thing I was taught in PI school | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/02/22 05:04 PM |
| 8 | Roses are red, violets are blue, hah no money for you!Not finding evidence that he did it IS the evidence he didn't do it. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" means there needs to be a 100% chance that someone is guilty. The fact he was still convicted should be a crime, and those involved should be in prison | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/02/22 04:18 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter