TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

af505 Archive

View 8 posts and 136 comments by af505 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

This Times article is so much BS. Media and stupid feminism continue to try and train, trap, and reduce alpha male qualities. Not in my home, not in my world.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 05:26 PM
1

That's a good description
/r/askTRP01/10/15 04:52 PM
1

there actually isn't a rug under the alpha (don't bend the spoon, because there is no spoon) Well, I don't know about that. I mean, if the Sigma tries to pull the rug out from an established Alpha, the Alpha's followers will respond and defend the Alpha (at least initially). So the rug, it's there. But, I'm willing to bet that a lot of natural alphas eventually become sigmas, just because they've had always the experiences they've wanted (and more importantly, didn't want), and now just don't ha…
/r/askTRP01/10/15 04:07 PM
2

A Sigma will be owned by an Alpha any day of the week in any social situation, as a rule. The Alpha has the social proof and admiration of the people. Females admire this about the Alpha, and Beta males revere the Alpha. Females will admire Sigmas until an Alpha arrives and displays DHV through social proof. Beta men too. The Sigma's strength is inner strength; he does what he pleases regardless of what people think. This brings him greater honor among alphas. The Alpha has greater outer strengt…
/r/askTRP01/10/15 10:10 AM
4

I like a lot of what you wrote except for one thing. Your analogy of how a Sigma sweeps the rug out from under an Alpha...I dont see this at all. An Alpha could pull the same thing over on a Sigma. What you are describing is just one person blind siding another person, it could be an Alpha or a Sigma doing it. The Alpha is much more powerful than a Sigma. They have the loyalty and admiration of the people in a way that Sigmas do not. Sigma's certainly exude alpha qualities, but the Alpha has eve…
/r/askTRP01/10/15 09:55 AM
2

You got leads. Now sell yourself to this woman, dammit! By making her want to sell herself to you
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 08:57 PM
1

I'm listening to you, but I'm not drinking the cool-aid quite yet. Assuming an entirely subservient nature can lead to being a push-over and disrespected by not only the rude boss, but the coworkers observing you as well. "Here is a guy who will put up with anything," and your coworkers may peg you low on the totem pole as well. I'm not saying to be an ass in response, definitely not. It's his boss and following command with an amiable attitude is expected. So yes I believe OP needs to be respec…
/r/askTRP22/09/15 07:56 PM
2

The easiest way to deal with this situation is apologise and respect her tantrums Apologize for what, what did OP do wrong? Looks like the guy 'maintained frame' and 'explained calmly.' If I missed something do fill me in.
/r/askTRP22/09/15 07:08 PM
1

Because sometimes it is about you. From what OP said I do not think it was about him. Sounds like he maintained frame, for starters. Good on you OP.
/r/askTRP22/09/15 07:06 PM
5

Sounds like a jerk. To answer your qu, this is my MO I don't lose my shit or confront her back. Maintain my frame at all costs. Positive and confident, high road attitude, ignoring her when she is present. Same MO for girls or guys. Bond with the rest of the staff, keep that network primed. And undermind her reputation when she is not present by questioning her, rolling my eyes, etc with the other staff. But still be cool about it all, just drop little comments about "Hey is Lisa ok (raise eyebr…
/r/askTRP20/09/15 07:59 AM
1

I clicked on the individual links for Race and Color (Wikipedia links you provided) and didn't find the specific origins info you called out. I also went to the actual Civil Rights Act of 1964 (cited by Wikipedia) and didn't find them either. Here is the act: http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=97&page=transcript The only thing I found were general notes regarding not discriminating by color and by race, in general terms. There was a whole section about protection of women, but no…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 03:56 PM
1

What I see at the link you provided is "Race" and "Color," but not a specific list of races and colors, thereby all races and colors appear inclusive unless there is more to be read
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 02:55 PM
1

wow there's even a name for this. interesting
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 10:41 PM
1

Look - NEITHER fats NOR carbs will make you fat. Excess calories will make you fat, period. Carbs will make you crave more calories. Carbs lead to cravings, but not to more fat than you'd get from any other food of the same caloric value.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 08:42 PM
6

yeh, but I'm a little concerned about getting blacklisted. if I didn't have a four-yr-old and needed this job to support him, I might. But I'm not young and free any more.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 08:32 PM
3

I've read it. It's a good book for people who care far too much about what others think of their behavior. It's also not a book about how to be an honest person. Why is it so important to you to be liked? You can have a lot of people think well of a version that isn't you, or, be your most pleasant self but have less friends because you don't always apologize first, don't always agree on every topic, and aren't always positive (although you ARE civil). You can be yourself and have a few close fr…
/r/askTRP04/09/15 03:10 PM
2

Don't stare at your date and you won't get in this predicament. In other words, don't look at your date unless you have something to say or she does. It's puppy-ish. You may as well be asking, "When you tell your date 'I really like you,' and she says, 'What?' what do you say?" You don't do that, that's waht.
/r/askTRP24/08/15 07:09 PM
0

im looking back at his responses and I see OP sticking by his guns and even disagreeing at times. doesnt seem to be apologizing.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 09:09 PM
1

you did the right thing. I hope you never question it. you can build a life and welcome your son into it someday. basically your ex kidnapped your son with full support from the legal system. and it's good you got out. you'll see your son soon
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 04:45 AM
6

Women want to be an alpha male apparently. The penis envy is real. That's what I get outta women nowadays. I dont disagree but I have a slightly different take. Some women are alpha. A few. And I dont have a problem with women who are truly alpha. What I DO have a problem with are women who use their gender, their vaginas, their persecution complexes, and their feminism to fake control over others in an attemtp to steal alpha roles. And unfortunatley most women who appear alpha are the latter, t…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 12:59 AM
2

I don't mean to sound rude or cold, but man this is the cold hard truth: that photo dude is doing nothing wrong, and you need to catch up by working on yourself. If your girl goes for him, it is as excusable as gravity. So work your ass off to better yourself. Also, try to ascertain what any weaknesses on his part are. If push comes to shove, there's nothing wrong with playing against them. But don't whine or complain to your girl. Just maintain your self esteem and keep working on yourself to b…
/r/askTRP16/07/15 03:26 PM
3

this girl will undoubtedly cheat on you. you saw her colors, abandon ship or turn her into a plate.
/r/askTRP13/07/15 05:36 AM
3

about 20 times and never a single problem. usually their hubbies have gotten fat and disinterested in these ladies (the ladies looked great). or they have grown apart. or their sex has become too routine. but no, never any problems with hubby.
/r/askTRP13/07/15 05:33 AM
1

But also factor in the men around you and what they are up to. it's a playing field, not a solo box.
/r/askTRP01/07/15 10:21 PM
1

My understanding is that gamma does their own thing like a sigma, but without the maverick/alpha of the true Alpha. gamma - friendly maverick. upbeat usually sigma - bad boy maverick Alpha - team leader (natural) could be wrong on this but this is my interp and I'm open to other insights. admittdely, I'm not sure of all of the nuances though
/r/askTRP01/07/15 10:18 PM
1

maybe youre right. I always thought the sigma was either a gamma loner or an alpha (alpha by a lot of sweat and hard work).
/r/askTRP01/07/15 10:03 PM
1

Should a Sigma find himself amongst an Alpha it would be only incidental. I can't imagine an Alpha would permit the presence of someone capable of superseding him Yep
/r/askTRP01/07/15 05:59 PM
1

I can agree with most of this. I do however feel that when it comes down to a group commitment, they will lean toward the alpha and such group "votes" happen often in groups so this cripples the sigma socially. So the sigma who is forced to interact in a group wherein a "natural alpha" is present is going to be sniffed out by the alpha and needs to pre-empt this by pulling up by the bootstraps and at the very least playing the alpha role to survive. because I've learned most alphas aren't mature…
/r/askTRP01/07/15 05:44 PM
2

But in a group, he is still beta to the alpha because the alpha will have everything that the sigma has PLUS the vote of the crowd. The alpha is engaged and social after all.
/r/askTRP01/07/15 04:20 PM
1

I wonder if you're referring to his other book The Rules of the Game. which admittedly I haven't read but have wondered about.
/r/askTRP29/06/15 03:27 AM
1

The Game, by Neil Strauss. It contained a lot of stories and sometimes a tip or two. but mostly yeah just stories and stories that didn't contain the important "how to" tips. at best it is a history book of PUA. that thing is sold leather bound like a Bible, so I definitely expected way more from it.
/r/askTRP29/06/15 01:07 AM
1

I'm trying to remember this stuff daily. Thanks for the reminder, I agree
/r/askTRP26/06/15 09:18 PM
1

ha I should
/r/askTRP26/06/15 09:17 PM
2

This was helpful to hear. Thanks for explaining it, provides me some hope.
/r/askTRP26/06/15 09:16 PM
1

Lots of good new insights here (for me anyway). Thanks for helping to add some perspective.
/r/askTRP26/06/15 09:15 PM
3

Hey buddy, kudos to you for figuring some things out so quickly. We all have made mistakes. Don't let anyone put you down, it's all learning. Regarding the girl: In my opinion, the guy either outclassed you, or, the girl is just very loose. If she's loose, good for you for getting out of there early on! And if it was that the guy outclassed you, it's ok -- we are ALL outclassed by somebody; the trick is to grow and hit the gym and become better as a result, versus feeling depressed. You sound li…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 05:28 PM
0

except...70% of us disagree with you.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 09:19 PM
1

temp agencies. they have already made connections for you, and they can find you permanent positions.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 11:07 PM
1

50 jobs a week That's great that you have high motivation and discipline to do this. I would add to this do research on the company, and then call the company, and ask the gatekeeper who answers the phone for the name of the hiring manager, along with that managers email address. Contact the manager by email telling them youre interested and asking them to tell you more about the position. This posits you as a quality candidate. call each of the employers (the very next day) to ensure they recei…
/r/askTRP21/05/15 06:04 PM
11

I disagree. If you do EXCEPTIONALLY WELL at GETTING ALONG WITH PEOPLE, you will move up regardless of how excellent you are at the "tasks" related to your job. People who get along with and influence other people have the rarest skill, and good management will always move them forward instead of others when the opp presents itself.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 05:15 PM
1

I also jacked into the MMFR soundtrack yesterday, during my run. Brothers In Arms is an exceptional track for that, among others on the album. So I disagree with you about "sometimes right/sometimes wrong." The Red Pill is always right, it is we who disagree. I agree that the movie is kickass BUT IS ALSO a screaming endorsement for the feminist evolution. That part sucks.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 02:17 AM
-1

Trying to understand you. it sounds like you're implying that if someone appears in dreams within a movie, then their characterization is less valid than characters who appear outside of dreams . I just can't buy that.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 10:44 PM
-1

he could've saved himself and not gotten in the situation. he got in that situation for her. White knight to the rescue.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 10:34 PM
2

Was it any fun to watch OP? Did you leave the movie thinking that was time well spent or wasted? I like the taste of pudding. But there are excess calories I don't like in pudding that I wish I could get rid of. I really liked Mad Max: Fury Road but yeah there are some bad elements I would like to get rid of. And unlike my cup of pudding, that movie is getting so much press and attention that those bad elements have a greater chance of doing even more damage to an already messed up gender cultur…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 10:30 PM
0

I didn't see that change in Nux. I saw Nux dying for pussy at the end, and simply exchanging his daddy issues for pussy issues.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 09:29 PM
-4

I don't see how this is any more feminist than wonder woman or the idea of the Amazons. It's not. They are just as sick and obtrusive. The reason I posted my thoughts is because unlike Wonder Woman and Amazon women, Mad Max Fury Road aims to compel the minds of millions of fans over the next few weeks and months given its powefully high postive reviews. That's bad given the sick feminist agenda blatantly depicted throughout the film.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 09:28 PM
6

Thunderdome's portrayal of the female is the antithesis of Fury Road. In TDome, the strong female was portrayed as a villain, who was dethroned and defeated. In F Road, all 13 of the women with speaking parts are saints and heroes; not a one is villainous in the slightest, while all of the men definitely are. Mad Max himself being the exception. This is feminism at its most sickening and obtrusive.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 09:25 PM
1

I dont cry often, but when I do: that is what I cry!
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:12 PM
18

No. There is imbalance. ALL of the women with speaking parts (I counted thirteen characters), as well as the other women portrayed without speaking parts -- all of them were heroes in the movie, to a one. Not one female villain. This movie was badass in terms of action, but over the barrel in terms of blatant feminism. And Nux was a pussy. He changed sides, and died, for pussy.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:02 PM
1

Also "they were the only left" (as they said), no kidding, when they had no way to reproduce in their utopia and shit ton of hazards and ways to die. This, yes. Wake up call, Feminism.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:02 PM
-4

at no point is it a feminist movie. Hogwash. Simply hogwash. You have to reckon then that every evil character in the movie is a male, while every female in the movie is a good character. And I mean every female character every stand-in townsperson portrayed as female every pregnant woman in the citadel (about five total) every rescued wife on the road (another five total) Charlize Theron the matron of the wives in the citadel all four of the masked elderly warrior women in the third act the you…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 05:51 PM
14

i've got a hunch that Star Wars seven is going to do this as well . I relish the opportunity to be proven wrong .
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 05:11 PM
35

Yep. Also- my personal opinion is that I don't mind that they empower females in the movie. My beef is the way that they accomplish that, by misportraying and demonizing alpha males. Portray some of the females as being strong that's fine ; but there's no need to do it at the expense of putting down the men as all being rapists and villains.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 03:54 PM
2

A man pulls it off like this. be a man OP. Oh, and she will possibly attwmpt to get a reason from you (e.g., What did I do? What did I say?). Don't go for it.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 10:59 PM
3

you're going with examine.com over johns hopkins, mayo, harvard, and loma linda. you sure youre unplugged bro?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 10:17 PM
1

Carcenogenic compounds in meat https://pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/facts/meat-consumption-and-cancer-risk and in dairy it is primarily casein
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:05 PM
2

Fuck PETA. This is science. And real men buy into science, not fairy tales.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 05:06 AM
-1

This is incorrect. The longest living, healthiest people groups in the world are vegetarian and vegan. The Mayo Clinic along with Thomas Campbell documented this in the best selling book The China Study. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1932100660/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1430954798&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SY200_QL40&keywords=the+china+study&dpPl=1&dpID=511i1Gp5XJL&ref=plSrch This book has been championed Johns Hopkins and Harvard Health Institute as well. It's the most comprehensive study on health ever conducted.…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 11:29 PM
-3

No, your logic in your inital statement was based on what the Majority do.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 10:19 PM
-2

find something from a big name univ or medical center (johns hopkins, mayo, harvard, etc)
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 10:17 PM
-1

reputable lacking. find something from a big name univ or medical center (johns hopkins, mayo, harvard, etc)
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 10:16 PM
0

Harvard, Mayo, Johns Hopkins...are good standard sources. I'd like to see something from a big researcher like these.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 10:13 PM
0

Articles or science research that share a more accurate number?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 08:10 PM
-2

Haha Ok...there are also more people around the world who believe in superstition versus science, are you going to join that majority as well?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 08:07 PM
-2

That is a totally different animal than a grass fed, hormone and antibiotic free cow. It is a little bit better, but only slightly. it's like drinking amonia instead of amonia with rat poison; the results are going to be enough to hit your HARD either way. The cancer causing and heart disease related agents in meat are there whether it is in a McDonald's burger patty, or, a Grade A hormone-free antibiotic-free patty.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 07:52 PM
1

Not exactly, those companies are actually 'refined carb' based, not carb based. The reason your carbs were sending you into hypoglycemia is because you weren't intaking enough fiber with the carbs to facilitate the sugar into your system at a proper rate. Eating almonds, flax seed (ground), chia seed, or strawberries (a few especially effective examples) will mitigate that problem so that your hunger doesn't turn into monster cravings. I subsist easily on 900-1200 cals a day during my cutting ph…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 07:26 PM
-3

don't buy the lies man. science says otherwise Mayo Clinic (http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/meatless-meals/art-20048193). Heart disease, high cholesterol. Johns Hopkins (http://www.vegsource.com/news/2010/10/pancreatic-cancer-meat-causes-it.html). Cancer. Loma Linda (http://www.llu.edu/public-health/health/vege-cancer.page). Cancer. Harvard Univ (http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/what-should-you-eat/protein/). Cancer, Osteoporosis, Type…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:55 PM
0

I hear you. But as long as I have Mayo, Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and Loma Linda on my side, I feel that I'm in the winner's circle. :)
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:54 PM
0

past a certain age I'd love to look like this guy at age 60. He's at only 20% protein on a mainly carb diet. "Protein is overrated" he says. http://www.veganbodybuilding.com/?page=bio_avi He is well aware of what others are waking up to in recent years - the meat and dairy empires have brainwashed individuals into fanatical reliance on meat and dairy products that in actuality make you fatter, lethargic, leech calcium, cause kidney stones, lead to higher rates of heart disease, and worst of all …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:43 PM
0

Chicken and especially fish are less impacting, but still second rate to the same vitamins and nutrients you can get through a vegan diet. Yes, a vegan diet is foreign to most people and requires study and learning (and unlearning) but nothing good comes easy. Red meat in particular is detrimental to the body. Dairy is even worse than meat. This is basic 101 in science today, but popular? Hell no, not popular.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:39 PM
2

This guy's results would beg to differ that it's necessary and science say that overhauling protein will tax kidneys, leech calcium, and lead to excess fat. For this guy I'm linking to below, he has 20% protein in his diet per day. That's it. As he says "protein is overrated." I would be very happy to have his physique at 60 yo. Don't think he's alone.... There are many others like him with this diet, I provided a ton of links to others in my other post below. http://www.veganbodybuilding.com/?p…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:35 PM
-2

Since the body can only absorb 30-40 g protein/every 2-3 hrs, I would say this 2500-4000 parameter is a bit on the wild side.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:28 PM
4

You would need to change your whole diet. The axiom No pain No Gain applies here. Read Forks Over Knives and The China Study for starters. Read what interviews with the bodybuilders I listed above say about their diets. And this guy - http://www.veganbodybuilding.com/?page=bio_avi
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:06 PM
0

It's sad that the best diet on the planet is not more readily available to people due to cost, and, lack of information about how to do it right. I have found inexpensive ways to do it (I'm on a budget man, it takes a stretch), and have read a lot to round out my knowledge. The issue is time, not so much expense. Time reading and learning how to do it inexpensively. But everything worthwhile takes time. There arw no shortcuts to a good thing. Diet - Beans, grains, and your basic apples and orang…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:04 PM
5

Points taken. So, I eat vegan. And I'm sad to say that MOST vegans I meet are pussies. Does that mean that veganism is for pussies? No. No it does not. It means that veganism has been hijacked by PETA and hipsters and needs to be taken back by bodybuilders for what it is: the healthiest dietary approach to making mass gains as is possible. And yes someone should definitely research diet needs before jumping headlong into veganism.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:43 PM
0

I think what CalvinHobbs3s is saying is that he has experienced gains doing bodyweight-centric exercise. He's not trying to condescend, he's just sharing what he has found works for him.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:09 PM
26

Nah there are plenty of vegan bodybuilders to prove that protein is what's needed not animals. Here are a bunch of weightlifting pros who are ALL vegan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R0w5xVVW8g (Shitty song on the audio track, but good examples in the video!) Also this guy's body: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83hYTT1o-JY And these men and women: http://www.veganbodybuilding.com/?page=videos And this beast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzyizp74VTw Also, the following leading medical inst…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 03:24 PM
1

Agreed. Playing on your phone and acting "bored" will come across as childish, and, moody. Like youre hurt.
/r/askTRP19/04/15 03:20 AM
11

Disagree. There are two extremes: If OP tried to show a lot of attention in her on the way back, it would have been beta. But at the other extreme, if OP reacted like you are suggesting he should have then he would have come across as butthurt and moody. Best solution was the casual, 'feelin fine' approach that OP used. Even during a freeze out you can communicate and be friendly. Its just a little less communication, but not moody. One area I agree with you on, is that OP could have made his re…
/r/askTRP17/04/15 11:57 PM
2

Im open to dialogue. Whats your case for that opinion
/r/askTRP16/04/15 01:49 PM
1

This...makes sense. And yes she is very, very submissive. She asks me if she can orgasm every time we have sex (in the moment right before she wants to orgams). So I think the pieces are falling together here for me, that she could have easily seen this gesture as submissive or "too giving" on my part.
/r/askTRP16/04/15 11:38 AM
1

did some good ol Google research. appears the Bible is explocitly condemns sex before marriage as a sin. probably can be forgiven, but not permissible otherwise http://www.gotquestions.org/sex-before-marriage.html
/r/askTRP16/04/15 10:57 AM
3

There are some girls who would fact check fattie's account with you. "Is that true?" And my response would be, "Uh, no." End of story. Fattie's braggadocio does not merit my honesty.
/r/askTRP16/04/15 10:12 AM
1

Not really consistent... A lot of the advice was actually sound. Like the sandwich idea.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 05:25 AM
4

I've done steps 1-7, listed below, and am working on step 7 right now: Talk about successes with women around your bp buddies, without bragging but now and then share a vignette so they are aware of your success Approach women in front of your bp buddies. Even if you don't get their number, getting the girl to smile, or talk to you, or laugh will be perceived as success by the bp Bp will start commenting on your confidence and finesse with ladies Continue steps 1 and 2 Bp will share examples of …
/r/askTRP29/03/15 07:33 PM
4

I see amused mastery and a patient maintenance of my frame as the first steps, but I'm glad someone mentioned "the stepping outside." If AMOG's harassment intensifies or continues, this step has got to happen at some point; step outside and skip the whining. Last resort but yeh I would put that out there at some point if he's annoying me enough too.
/r/askTRP27/03/15 07:59 PM
5

Agreed. Something else i'm finding goes well with amused mastery is connecting with any females there via crazy eyes/rolling my eyes at the AMOG's expense. With a subtle smile usually.
/r/askTRP27/03/15 07:56 PM
1

Great scenario, thanks for sharing. I haven't found a whole lot about amused mastery online and scenarios like this are always helpful.
/r/askTRP27/03/15 07:52 PM
2

This. I wrestled with the same question recently and chatted with friends both on this site as well as off-line, and amused mastery was suggested as and is the best solution. I like Tombreck2's scenario too, because the comeback is concise and not trying to be too clever. And sometimes you won't always have a comeback. But if your demeanor is framed with amused mastery it's pretty hard to lose.
/r/askTRP27/03/15 07:47 PM
3

Jaime wants to pretend that biology and psychology don't reveal massive differences between male and female composition. Jamie would like to rewrite the rules of engagement between men and women despite what evolution has proved works. And we need feminism because Jamie needs a speaking engagement.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 06:07 PM
2

my main plate would immediately start clawing this guys fucking eyes out if he just came out of nowhere and picked her up. Depends on personality. I have some very submissive plates who would giggle out of shock and bewilderment more than anything, but would still be uncomfortable with it.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 08:54 PM
1

This is true, it is possible. But I don't think it's the rule. Large size is going to trump smaller size between two experienced alphas. If AMOG is aggressive chances are he's been around the block and a fight or two before.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 08:33 PM
2

If your girl is willing to be taken If she's willing? Oh yeh, then let her go. But the girls in most of this videos situations were not 'willing,' they were rather taken or assaulted. In that case, the alpha needs to step up and assert his own will.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 08:32 PM
1

Also I recommend looking into Amused Mastery as a response. Guys like Brad Pitt, Bruce Willis, Arnold Schwarzenneger, and Sean Connery are known for playing of AMOGs with this approach. For example: http://contemplatingconflict.blogspot.com/2013/10/amused-mastery.html
/r/askTRP24/03/15 08:29 PM
1

Interested in your reasoning again mate-guarding, and, what you would suggest instead.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 08:18 PM
2

Guys my size or smaller: If a comparably-sized guy touches me or my girl, I will grab his arm and say "do not touch her again." evenly and coolly, no passion. Then cease communicating with him, take her hand and walk away. If he does it again, I will shove him or possibly punch him square in the jaw/face. For example, the black guy at the end should have laid him out after the instigator petted his head. That was the second or third physical affront. Totally crossed the final line with that one.…
/r/askTRP24/03/15 08:06 PM
3

I've dealt with shit test like this in years past. It was during a time when I had let myself go. Getting chunky, or not being as socially active, or just not being as good of a provider. I'm TRP all the way, but I think that this type of shit test is the females way of waking you up before she has to finally walk out. It's like a final grace period before the end. Because God knows that since I got my physique together, engaged socially, and moved my career forward, I have never dealt with thes…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 04:04 PM
25

This response. It's ok for her to fuck around if you are fucking around. But she doesn't need to be telling you, and you shouldn't be asking. Only monogamous exclusive people would have that conversation and that is not you and her.
/r/askTRP20/03/15 05:43 PM
2

Ah, so you are saying she will not have an abortion regardless as either he or the state will pay. If that is the legal clime then yes agreed with that thought. However... If it's his child then the contention still exists, only now it is between OP and the state. A move to a non-bilateral agreement-based country is still his only other option apart from paying her for the next 20 yrs.
/r/askTRP19/03/15 06:29 PM
15

This is absolutely the best option. The situation is all about money from here on. If she doesn't think she can get any from you, then she will have an abortion. If she has the baby and it's yours (absolutely have a court-approved paternity test done), you will pay thousands of dollars a year to her. If you move out of state, it will only take a couple months for that state to garnish your paycheck via a bilateral agreement with your previous state. If you move out of country, most countries als…
/r/askTRP19/03/15 03:40 PM
2

I appreciate your response, but what do you mean by gatekeepers of commitment
/r/askTRP19/03/15 04:45 AM
1

Too much reaction
/r/askTRP19/03/15 04:38 AM
6

Good responses because they were playful. You weren't rude, it was the right level of banter. Giving her a hard time but not quite being a jerk.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 08:30 AM
2

It's a shit test. Gotta show her that your frame can outlast her attempts to break your frame. If she gets really annoying and you run out of clever answers, maybe just go "that again?" and now you have framed her as social faux pas if she continues.
/r/askTRP13/03/15 02:37 AM
3

why the hell that maid, is my question.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 12:27 AM
1

I'll check out those links. Thanks.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 07:42 PM
2

Oh you might like the book. One thing that Strauss was honest about regarding Tyler -- at the end of the book, Tyler orchestrates a slow mutiny and Strauss is booted out of Project Hollywood (which Strauss himself started).
/r/askTRP25/02/15 07:22 PM
1

Thanks for the encouraging message mate. Yes, I too am (obviously) a beginner at this but I am learning a little more each day. It's been wonderful, eye opening, empowering. And the principles are working.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 07:21 PM
3

By pushing extra hard over ~2 months, the farthest I've gotten is a hand job. I've tried romancing her hard and backing off entirely for a week. I think Palmer hit the issue on the head in his statement below - All of your effort is probably the reason she isn't sleeping with you. If you want to try and slug it out and make this work, the technique I've used and heard others use successfully is the Freeze Out. Instead of trying to pry her open, leave sex alone entirely; but also, you remove some…
/r/askTRP25/02/15 06:40 PM
0

You know another one...is Chris Pine. The actor. That guy owns his environment. His interview with William Shatner (among other examples) was raw, he just maintains his inner strength and nothing breaks that kid's frame. Link: http://youtu.be/yPB5n7xnIiY
/r/askTRP25/02/15 06:34 PM
0

My only exposure to Tyler (Durden?) at this point is via Strauss's 'The Game.' Is Tyler actually a more well-rounded guy aside from that book? He doesn't get painted the best in that publication (no one really does, but he gets it pretty bad).
/r/askTRP25/02/15 06:29 PM
0

Yes and yes. Mark Driscoll wasn't as bad as some. He founded the Mars Hill church that had become nationwide and successful. But he quit pastoring last year and the church folded. Apparently church leaders accused him of being "domineering" and "disrespectful to women" (i.e., he taught that it was just as important for a woman to please a man has for a man to please a woman, and he talked about his wife from an alpha perspective though not disrespectful). All around me death of the alpha male th…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:13 PM
6

He is able to pick and choose, and likes what he saw in her. He has options.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 03:13 PM
3

Some that come to my mind include Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, Joe Rogan, and (going way back) Teddy Roosevelt. In my opinion.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 02:52 PM
2

yes I should not have called her "gfriend" in the title, I don't consider her that and we both get that it's a fun shallow thing. Not LTR. RE your question about exclusivity, yes we agreed that she could sleep with other women, and that I would be involved with one other person at any given time but not more than one. I have one other plate I see once or twice a week. What kinds of rules do you set up, if any, with your plates?
/r/askTRP25/02/15 01:40 PM
1

hey I am learning every day, today more than others I guess! So I could be wrong, let me know your feedback: But it seems to me that if it's ok for me to have plates, then it should be fair for her as well. I'm going to talk to her about it. Basically - "I'm ok with it, but why do you need it?" If she says she's unhappy (doubt it) we'll talk about it, or she might just says she likes variety of sex. Like I do. I'll also reiterate that I'll be engaging in open opportunities, and, that we always n…
/r/askTRP25/02/15 01:30 PM
0

Sex is great, she orgasms one or two times at least each time we're together. I think I agree, demote to plate. No, we are not LTR that's for sure. It's just fun.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 01:14 PM
1

This is a good point. Makes me think also that even if I tell her I am ok with her sleeping with others, that could devalue me in her eyes. I will probably not agree to this again.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 01:13 PM
-2

Seriously, I don't care if someone else is fucking her. I'm all about open relationships. The lack of knowledge about it is what has pissed me off.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 12:59 PM
-1

This for some reason reminds me.... When I was a church goer I went to a Mens Retreat, two fuckin decades ago. It was church sponsored, and one of the ministers shared a message for men about Sex and Marriage. He told this story. Apparently, his wife would lay a pink nightdress over the bed in the morning if she was willing to have sex that evening. He mentioned that "on those days, I'm on my best behavior!" And everybody laughed and nodded heads. Even then long ago before any knowledge of Red P…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 12:43 PM
1

It was disgusted eyeroll, therefore yes a loss. Why can't a RP man show disgust? Why can't we react congruent with the offended anger we feel inside? Why do we have to pretend this amused mastery stuff, it seems weak to me. Yes I get that it works, but it seems weak.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 11:06 PM
1

She'll either play along with you, or continue to play along with him. On one occasion I rolled my eyes at her when he walked away and she said, "Is he getting to you?" but she said it in an analytical way judging me, not in a way that was supportive. I felt that I could not win! If I react aggressively while he is present, I lose by DLV. If I don't react or react nonchallantly (rolling eyes), then she calls me out. How to win. ! Were all 3 instances on the same night? Or spread out. Did you tel…
/r/askTRP23/02/15 08:40 PM
1

I see what you mean. Thanks.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 08:32 PM
1

If this works, it is the most bang for the least effort that I've heard shared yet. Thank you for sharing this. What do you think about this though -- If you say " "Why are you still here?" and he smiles and winks at the gfriend as he walks away. Is that not a loss on my part? I'm just learning here man, but this seems like a loss if he were to do this in response.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 08:21 PM
1

I hear you. The other guy has a girlfriend and she is very loyal to him. they've been married for years and are obvious soulmate types. That of course made all of this feel even worse.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:17 AM
1

Good point. That would have been a fair on my part. It's pretty much too late to go back now and both of us have moved on. But it's good to reflect on this feedback to plan better next Time
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:16 AM
1

Thanks I'm just trying to formulate a good plan for next time. Somewhere between being weak sauce and being obnoxiously reactive
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:15 AM
1

Hey I also read that story. Pool game BJ etc. I agree that was his best option. I appreciate your feedback. I'm not naturally a comedian so I've been trying to look at other ways to handle the situation, God forbid history repeats itself. But even if history does not repeat itself I need to know when my own mind that I have a strong plan.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:13 AM
1

Not a bad idea, thanks for the tip
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 11:00 PM
1

My concern was that if I had let him know that it, then it would've made me look weak.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 10:59 PM
2

It's something I'm not a natural at I have to admit. But I can see how vital it is to learn this skill. Thanks for the great explanation.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 10:53 PM
3

Thanks man, I can take it & I think you're right. Any feedback on specifics in responding more effectively (to him)?
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 10:29 PM
1

I hear you. My concern was that if I drew a hard line with him like that that would make me look like the bad guy and lower my value in her eyes. As though I needed to keep smiling and take the high road in a sense. Frankly I'm not sure what I should've done but what I did didn't seem to work either!! Regarding her loyalty in other situations, can say there were no red flags with anybody else. Although I've never run into an individual who is this annoying and this consistent in their behavior l…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 10:20 PM
-3

I have to agree. It read more like a Hallmark card and seemed derived to me. Also we needed concrete examples. No offense
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 03:06 AM
6

I hear you. What I'm saying is that he might not be interested in plates without brains. After a lot of forays into the world of 8 and 9 bimbos, this is my mindset. So I may be reading my mind set into him. Obviously I can't be sure.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 06:54 PM
10

multiple Sports Illustrated swimsuit models An intelligent dude like Sergey has already gone through these options. He wanted more, someone intelligent and intellectually provocative, hence he steered for the affair with his employee that he was in proximity to. Granted it was a bad move, but it makes sense nonetheless. An intellectually stimulating, super-highly intelligent, wealthy equal like Amanda would be rarer than swimsuit models to Sergey.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 06:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter